Thursday, February 11, 2016

The History of (Hispanic) American Politics in Southeast LA County

I found this incredible review discussing politics in Southeastern Los Angeles County.

It sheds some light on the chronic corruption in the region, and why a new revelation of citizenship and authority is essential to restore transparency, accountability, and security to the region for all Americans!


SOUTH GATE, Calif. — A FEW weeks ago, the City Council in this suburb southeast of Los Angeles appointed a Mexican immigrant to its advisory council. Jesus Miranda is from Michoacán and owns a taco restaurant here. He’ll advise the council on housing development and other issues.

I contacted the South Gate City Clerk. This man is not an illegal alien. He is a legal resident. The city of South Gate has not appointed any illegals to any public board.

Mr. Miranda’s appointment is hardly national news. But small moments like these are signs of a historic change of heart toward America and civic engagement among Mexican immigrants, many of whom, like Mr. Miranda, have been here for decades. No place offers a clearer view of this change than the suburbs southeast of Los Angeles.

What matters with this appointment? Residents of Mexican descent are getting involved in local politics. Hopefully for the better.

South Gate (pop. 96,000) and its neighbors were mostly farmland until the 1930s, when migrants from the Midwest and later World War II veterans moved to work in the factories of Chrysler, G.M., Firestone and Bethlehem Steel. Subdivisions sprouted. Towns emerged with bucolic names: Maywood, Huntington Park, Bell Gardens. Union jobs sustained a civic ecosystem of local newspapers, Rotary Clubs and Fourth of July parades.

Union jobs, industry jobs--all of the work sustained the region. The lack of economic diversity probably hurt the region.

Then, in the late 1970s, the factories started leaving, and so did the white people. Their civic institutions atrophied. By 1990, towns like South Gate that had been 90 percent white were more than 90 percent Latino.

The rhetoric in this passage is pejorative. Civic institutions do not immediately signify "white people."

In Huntington Park, the Kiwanis club boasts of members, and there are a number of active Chambers of Commerce in the area, too.

The new residents, crucially, were not from East Los Angeles, where Mexican-Americans had developed an activist political tradition since the 1960s. Instead, they were Mexican, straight from the ranchos — small villages on Mexico’s frontiers, far from the center and from government. Most came here to work in jobs they believed, even after decades, would be temporary. They focused their lives on returning home someday. They packed into cheap housing and spent their savings on building homes back in Mexico.

This description is revealing and accurate. One of the councilmembers from Huntington Park, Valentin Amezuita, boasts of such a pedigree.

Mexican rancho culture valued self-reliance and hard work. But rancheros also shunned politics, and, in particular, the paternalistic embrace of the PRI, the party that ran Mexico like Tammany Hall for 71 years. Immigrants brought that history with them, and in the dense southeast enclaves, their attitudes didn’t change.

After decades of condescension, pandering, and outright fraud and corruption, anyone would become a cynic.

This tradition of non-engagement, combined with Mexico’s proximity to California, meant that this wave of immigrants was fundamentally different from previous groups in other parts of the country.

This distinction is crucial. Hispanic residents in Texas do not resemble the Hispanic communities in Florida, or in New York, or elsewhere in the country. The diversity of American citizens demands more respect than "Brown people" or "Latinos". Tejanos are more conservative, assimilated into the American culture, proud of the deep traditions of this country.

Arriving in the United States, the Irish in Chicago, Italians in New York and Cubans in Miami came for good. They wedged their way into big cities using politics as the crowbar to more economic opportunity, and jobs in government. They had to compete with, and learn from, established groups and elites.

This was not the case for Mexicans in the California suburbs. As the region morphed into a service economy, they easily found work. In 1986, Congress passed legislation granting amnesty to around 800,000 immigrants in Los Angeles County, many of whom eventually acquired citizenship.

Congress did not pass amnesty. Republican President Ronald Reagan signed off on amnesty, with the proviso that the border would be secured. The secure border never came.

Suddenly many residents were voters, yet without any tradition of informed franchise or accountability. What’s more, those who lived out in these Los Angeles suburbs had no one to show them a way to civic engagement. Not many had the education, or English, necessary to run a California municipality. Caring little for politics, they avoided city hall and rarely participated in civic institutions.

The dangers of blanket amnesty could not be clearer. The last thing that this country needs is more amnesty. We need enforcement and engagement.

In this vacuum, beginning in the mid-1990s, an astonishing cast of scoundrels was voted into office by immigrants casting the first votes of their lives.

Yes, indeed. The corruption is rife in the region.

In South Gate, an unhinged brand of politics mutated, based on anonymous fliers. In 1999, one council candidate was accused, in a fake newspaper article reprinted in an anonymous flier, of molesting two boys. In 2001, anonymous fliers mailed to voters falsely claimed that two councilmen had fathered children they later abandoned. Tapping immigrants’ deep connection to Mexico, fliers, in Spanish and English, accused candidates of being related to Carlos Salinas de Gortari, the disgraced ex-president of Mexico, and of belonging to the PRI.

These fliers seem clownish, but immigrant voters believed them.

The answer to problems of civic engagement lie in the rule of law, enforcement of the law.

The council majority that won power paid voters back with classic PRI-style giveaways: free hot dogs and sodas at first, and then toys one Christmas. Once in power, it was police badges to cronies and millions of dollars to law firms.

How about that? Bread and circuses, basically. Use other people's money to keep the "common people" content and ignorant. A lot of this is going on right now in the region, including Cudahy, where the city council gives away food on specific days.

Eventually, enough voters woke up. Ashamed they’d been duped, they recalled the treasurer and his cronies in 2003. The treasurer was later prosecuted and sent to federal prison. South Gate, however, was on the brink of bankruptcy.

The consequences of bad government linger for years. Citizens need to pay attention at all times and ensure that good people get into government and do good things.

Most southeast towns, stripped of their civic girdings, have gone through similarly toxic municipal episodes.

This crime and corruption is still eating up Southeast LA cities, including Huntington Park and Cudahy, as well as Maywood.

María Chacón, an immigrant from Chihuahua who ran Bell Gardens (pop. 42,000) like a Mexican cacique, or political boss, was convicted of conflict of interest for engineering her appointment as city manager.


The town of Cudahy hired a former janitor as city manager, and an opposing candidate had a Molotov cocktail thrown at his house.

I read about these soap operas.

In Bell (pop. 36,000), the city manager voted himself and others annual salaries well above that earned by the president of the United States. He and his former assistant are now in prison. Five southeast suburbs, in fact, had at least one elected official go to prison in the last dozen years.

What is the common thread? Illegal immigration, combined with an ignorant or disengaged populace unwilling to get involved. 

But each boil of corruption, once lanced, left its respective town a little cleaner, more chastened.

Today, a virtually secured border has significantly slowed the flow of new immigrants who kept ranchero political culture alive. Mexico’s recent medieval violence has also terrified many of those who are already here into staying put.

"Secure border"? Ha! Not yet! Notice that the imbreeding of bad politics has made its way into these cities. The answer? Legal naturalization and citizenship, which informs every person of their power and responsibilities in their communities.

As a result, many Mexican immigrants no longer cling to the dream of returning home one day. This change is happening across the United States — from Idaho to North Carolina — but it is most palpable in these Mexican immigrant enclaves of Los Angeles County.

“I get the sense that folks now see this as home,” said Jorge Morales, a South Gate city councilman and son of Mexican immigrants. “My parents always talked about going back to Mexico. Now it’s a place they’ll visit, but this is home.”

Last summer, a shopping center opened in South Gate. It was to be called El Portal (The Gateway), but a market survey found that people in an area that is more than 90 percent Latino wanted no Latino theme to the center. “What people wanted was something like they saw on the West Side” of Los Angeles, which is predominately white, said Councilman Morales.

I welcome a thriving, vibrant Southeastern LA County. South Gate is busy, lively. I see lots of people working and playing there. Downey has become "The Brown Beverly Hills" to some, but also houses Asian-Americans and other diverse groups.

The Azalea Regional Shopping Center, as it was named instead, held a Christmas-tree-lighting ceremony last month, at which members of South Gate’s Girl Scout Troop 16325, Latinas all, sang “Jingle Bells” and “Rudolph the Red-Nosed Reindeer.”

I have noticed these similar celebrations.

No Girl Scout troop had existed in South Gate for some three decades. But two years ago, a local mother got fed up with driving her daughter two towns over and formed her own troop. “People are getting involved, coming out of their shells,” Daisy Prieto, the volunteer troop leader, and daughter of Mexican immigrants, told me.


St. Helen Catholic Church for years held toy drives for orphanages in Tijuana. This year, the drive benefited needy kids in South Gate.


MEANWHILE, immigrants like Mr. Miranda have learned to use city hall, and local government has become significantly more professional since the days of rancid fliers and giveaways. At a recent meeting, the City Council took up mundane but essential municipal issues: purchasing a diesel flatbed truck, zoning for emergency homeless shelters and appointments to its advisory council. The town’s advisory councils are populated by a healthy mix of white and black, as well as Latino.

Wonderful! These institutions belong to all Americans, no matter what their skin color.

South Gate’s experience stands as a template for hundreds of small towns in Tennessee, the Carolinas, Kansas and elsewhere — towns that have been rejuvenated by new Mexican workers, who now form their essential working classes, yet remain civically absent.

South Gate is becoming a strong city, and a welcome destination for shoppers. I have been there a number of times, and I enjoy visiting. Downey is still one of my favorite places to visit--outside the Beach Cities, of course!

When I started reporting on the southeast suburbs in the 1990s, they felt to me like one enormous Mexican rancho — the way the Lower East Side of Manhattan must have once seemed a big shtetl. Today, they feel like an iceberg finally separating and floating away from mother Mexico. People are more focused on how things run where they raise children than in villages they’ll never return to.

Los Angeles is no rancho. Not anymore.

It’s taken a long time. But it is a good thing for Mexican immigrants and for the small American towns where so many have landed.

It's time to start referring to active, legal residents as who they are: Americans!

Final Reflection

Citizenship matters. Legal immigration matters.

Cities must be made of citizens, otherwise, they dilapidate into enclaves of neglect and corruption.

The 1986 amnesty was wrong not just because it rewarded law-breakers, but because the process of naturalization and civic empowerment takes time. A stroke of the pen on a bill cannot integrate diverse, widespread groups of people over time.

I have more good news to share, in spite of the lingering corruption and malfeasance in a number of city councils. More legal residents in the region are waking up, fighting back, and demanding good government at the local level. No more corruption, no more waste and fraud.

"We the People" is expanding, encompassing the regions long considered forgotten by the law. More than "Hispanic" -- American!

No comments:

Post a Comment