Saturday, December 28, 2019

Singapore Protects Children from LGBT Content in Movies -- More Countries Should Do the Same


The Republic of Singapore, a city-state located at the base of Malaysia and at the intersection of a number of Southeast Asian countries, maintains a conservative family culture within its borders.

The country still criminalizes sodomy, even though the elected leadership has announced that they will not actively enforce this legislation.

The country has recently forbidden foreign influence of any kind in any of the country's public assemblies, including the Pink Dot Festival, which promotes LGBT themes and advocates for the repeal of the anti-sodomy law on Singapore's books.

Public attitudes toward homosexuality, transgenderism, and the like remain negative, despite perverse attempts from LGBT Activists to force accept of these issues into the mainstream of Singapore society.

Another welcome step that the country has taken is to prevent the broadcasting of pro-gay scenes and themes in international movies showcased in the city-state.

Such is the case with the latest iteration of the Star Wars franchise, which was purchased and has now been exploited by the Disney Corporation. A same-sex kiss worked its way into Star Wars: The Rise of Skywalker. However, to ensure wider release to general audiences in Singapore, the movie distributors removed this same-sex kiss. Otherwise, a M18 rating would have been placed on the film, and thus cut off a large source of potential revenue.

This kind of censorship should be happening in the United States, and to such a degree that these films will cease incorporating pro-LGBT themes and moments in the movies. The truth is that more Americans, especially the younger generation, are getting tired of this LGBT propagandizing getting forced onto the general public, especially children.

Of course, there are entertainment commentators who think that Singapore's views on family values in entertainment are backwards, and that the country needs to give up safeguarding the well-being of the youth and the general public.

Teng Yong Ping of Yahoo Lifestyle SEA wrote the following:

Teng Yong Ping
Teng Yong Ping


Here's his brief bio:

Yong Ping covers lifestyle and entertainment news for Yahoo Lifestyle Singapore. He watches too much television for his own good and, in between binging Netflix shows, plays badminton and sings with a show choir.

Perhaps he should get out more often and consider what mothers and fathers want for their children, as opposed to the narrow-minded, arrogant views of the chattering classes on the Internet.

What's more, here are his featured profiles and friends on his Facebook page:


He is clearly biased toward the repeal of 377a, the law in Singapore which criminalizes homosexual sodomy.

Notice also that one of his main friends is Otto Fong, the radical homosexual activist who came out in 2007 while serving as a public school teacher in Singapore. He subsequently was forced to retire, but he is still pushing for the normalization of his sexual perversion. Other of Yong Ping's friends include those who are #Ready4Repeal. (For more information on Otto Fong, click here)

Image may contain: 1 person, suit
Otto Fong,  Former Singapore Teacher, Radical Gay Activist 

This entertainment "journalist" is clearly an LGBT propagandist, if he is not an active homosexual himself. Such corrupted reporting has worked against the news industry in general, and entertainment media in particular. This kind of forced indoctrination and propagandizing is completely unacceptable. Isn't it is his job to report whether a movie is worth watching or not?

Now let us consider the contents of his report.

Here are the noteworthy comments from his article condemning the Republic of Singapore's decisions to censor and remove pro-LGBT scenes and sentiments from the movies.

As pop culture juggernauts like Hollywood studios and Netflix include more and more queer characters and stories in their content, Singapore’s regressive censorship rules will increasingly be invoked in more visible ways. 

Good for Singapore!

Last week, as Star Wars: The Rise Of Skywalker (TROS) opened in Singapore, it transpired that Disney had voluntarily cut a scene of a same-sex kiss on the lips between two minor female characters in a romantic relationship. This meant that Disney would be able to retain a PG13 rating for the movie in Singapore, so that families could bring their children to watch it. 
You can’t really blame Disney, which owns Lucasfilm, the studio that produces the Star Wars movies. They’re just looking after their bottom line, after all. In censoring its film, albeit by cutting mere seconds of footage, Disney was simply reacting to the Singapore government’s long-standing LGBT censorship policy.

Disney pays enough attention to its bottom line in other countries, enough that they removed the LGBT propagandizing from its latest Star Wars movie. But why didn't they do the same thing for the American audiences? Does Disney really believe that general audiences in the United States want to watch the same insufferable "woke" filth?

In Singapore, where gay sex is illegal, movies that depict queer characters or queer romances usually receive at least an M18 rating, or an R21 rating if the LGBT content is considered egregious enough. (Only people above the ages or 18 or 21 can watch movies with such ratings.) Such content is censored from TV shows too.

Good! The same thing needs to happen in the United States, Canada, and other English-speaking countries with a considerable share of the prospective audience market share.

These censorship rules are based on the idea that media content should not “promote homosexual lifestyles” – that seeing gay characters onscreen will turn children gay – which is, of course, rubbish. 

And there you have the not-so subtle arrogance of these entertainment writers and reporters. The truth is that the LGBT Agenda has been fighting for a long time to normalize their sexual perversions for general audiences, especially children. Gay activists made their intentions very clear in the late 1980s and early 1990s. They were not agitating merely for political acquiescence. They expected to be accepted, and they insisted that they would not rest until homosexual and transgender behaviors and conduct.

In their latest push for accommodation, domination, and admiration, the LGBT lobbies are demanding that their characteristics behaviors receive considerable attention and promotion in the arts and entertainment industries. When does this abuse of the public square cease?

Even the way local mainstream media reported the news was telling. Yahoo Lifestyle SEA first broke the news that the gay kiss in TROS had been censored in Singapore. It was only days later that mainstream publications such as The Straits Times and Today Online featured the same news – using foreign news wire articles, mind you, not their own reporting. This was after international news outlets such as BBC and the New York Times had already picked up the news. 

There is a silver lining to this revelation: major news outlets like the British Broadcasting Corporation and the New York Times are not that major anymore. In fact, the legacy media is in complete freefall as fewer people are putting up with the Marxist propagandizing which has become so ubiquitous. In fact, this is great news for pro-family and pro-tradition forces throughout the world.

TROS is groundbreaking in being the first global blockbuster to feature a same-sex romantic kiss. But it’s by no means the first instance of LGBT representation in tentpole Hollywood films.

No, what is truly ground-breaking is that the Disney Corporation has ruined the Star Wars franchise so completely. Despite a decent revenue haul over the past two weeks, this movie had the worst opening weekend of all the Star Wars movies. "Get woke and Go Broke" now has struck the Disney Corporation and its Star Wars franchise.

The Beauty And The Beast live-action remake was the first Disney film to feature gay characters. Marvel’s Avengers: Endgame had a minor gay character that mentioned dating another man. Star Trek Beyond retconned Hikaru Sulu into a gay character complete with husband and daughter. Pixar’s Toy Story 4 had a female same-sex couple with a son in kindergarten. (These films all received PG ratings in Singapore since the gay characters were tiny parts of the movies – and they didn’t kiss.)

These themes should not be promoted to children, to anyone. How much longer before everyday movie-goers rebel in larger measure by boycotting these movies?

The kiss in TROS may have been merely a split-second nod to LGBT inclusion. But Hollywood giant Marvel Studios, which is also a subsidiary of Disney, has stated its commitment to portraying greater diversity in the next phase of its hugely popular movies.

Greater diversity is going to be mean less prosperity very soon.

The upcoming Thor: Love And Thunder will feature a queer romance involving the bisexual Valkyrie, played by A-lister Tessa Thompson. And The Eternals, which counts Angelina Jolie among its cast, will feature a gay superhero character

Will Singapore censor such movies? Marvel is a cinematic powerhouse that has influenced global pop culture profoundly. It now boasts the box-office record for highest grossing film for Avengers: Endgame (US$2.8 billion or S$3.8 billion), which capped off a decade-long blockbuster saga. If Singapore censors LGBT characters from these beloved movies, it will be very obvious to millions of local and global moviegoers how backward our government is. 

People in Singapore really should not care what other countries think of them. The fact that Asian countries are more faithful to family commitments than diversity quotas works in their favor. More countries need to be committed to promoting what is right, true, and good, not "accepting." Besides, so-called cinematic powerhouses risk losing whatever funding or cultural influence the more that they continue pushing sexual perversion and deviance onto the greater culture. In fact, more countries are taking firmer steps against LGBT hegemony within their borders, in large part because of the virulent spread of venereal disease.

Let’s do some thought experiments. What if the LGBT storyline featuring Tessa Thompson in Thor: Love And Thunder leads to, say, three minutes being cut from the movie so that it gets a PG13 rating? What if 10 minutes are cut? What if The Eternals are rated R21 because the gay protagonist cannot be excised from the story? What if Marvel decides to withdraw the movie in Singapore rather than bow to censors? What would that say about Singapore, supposedly an open and cosmopolitan city?

How does one define "open" or "cosmopolitan"? Allowing rampant homosexuality and other forms of sexual degradation in the movie industry has not opened up the industry, but rather shown how closed off, how narrow-minded the industry has become. This kind of "openness" is rather stagnating and debilitating, actually. Singapore is rightly to reject such presentations.

My guess is that many Singaporeans would feel, at best, indignant, and at worst, embarrassed at the image portrayed of our country. 

This "woke" entertainment journalist is so out of touch, one has to wonder how much longer he will remain in business or even have a job with "Yahoo News Singapore."

It’s not just Disney or blockbusters that are becoming more inclusive. There has been a general trend towards diversity in films and television. Singapore’s censorship will likely kick in increasingly, as content features more LGBT characters. Already, two Netflix cartoon series – The Dragon Prince, and She-Ra And The Princesses Of Power – have M18 ratings in Singapore because of lesbian characters. These are shows meant for kids. 

Children's cartoons?! The targeting and systematic indoctrination toward children is beyond outrageous. American audiences should be raising alarm on this perverted content. It should not be released to any country.

With OTT streaming becoming more common, censors will increasingly become less relevant as well, since the final arbiter of content consumption on Netflix is the parent holding the restriction passcode, and not a committee of state-appointed censors. 

Mr. Teng Yong Ping obviously missed the memo, in which more Netflix subscribers have happily decided to cancel their subscriptions rather than permit such LGBT filth into their homes. Parents are engaging their rights to protect their children from such brazen indoctrination. Children deserve to know the truth about LGBT behaviors, that they are inherently disordered and destructive, and

The trend towards diversity is inevitable and a positive sign of progress in LGBT representation in media. Queer people, as do women and minority groups, deserve to see themselves being represented in the films and TV shows that reflect our culture and communities. 

Here we go: "The trend toward diversity is inevitable." Not so fast. This "wrong side/right side of history" argument has been quite popular with the Left. They love to give this impression that the rushed imposition of homosexuality, transgenderism, and the like is inevitable in our global or even in local cultures. Nothing could be further from the truth. The fact is that more young people are becoming increasingly strained by and disdainful of this whole LGBT Agenda. They have grown up recognizing at the outset that it's a tyrannical regime. The whole LGBT push has nothing to do with "Live and Let Live" tolerance, as they had falsely yet persuasively claimed twenty years ago.

Having said that, it is certainly a government’s prerogative to censor what it deems harmful to society. But if Singapore’s censors choose to continue erasing queer people from our stories, they will find that the bigotry and homophobia in the country will be more and more obvious to the rest of the world.

"Queer people" do not exist. This is a lie, and more people are waking up to this lie. The Republic of Singapore has every right to censor such content, and the parents and stakeholders in the city-state have every right to continue demanding the diminution of such perversity in the public square.

Final Reflection

The entertainment industry has long sought to position itself as the full and final arbiter of culture taste and norms. However, they have pushed this intended hegemony too far, neglecting to realize that there is a growing cohort of men and women, especially from younger generations, who are tired of LGBT issues being imposed on the general cultural narrative.

There is nothing in this life that is inevitable. The notion that homosexual privileges will gain inevitable ascendancy simply is not true. There is a subtle yet growing culture undercurrent that is militantly pushing back against the normalization of homosexuality, transgenderism, and other paraphilias around the world. The entertainment industries are already discovering that their growing push to make something unnatural and abnormal into something, well, normal is not working. Hollywood does not have the industrial pre-eminence that it once possessed. Corporate media in the United States and throughout the world is not as strong as it used to be, either. Silicon Valley social media giants are starting to face fresh competition, as well, since individual users can propagate their views through different venues.

No, LGBT domination is not inevitable. In fact, the arrogant pre-eminence of this movement, now demanding its place in children's libraries and general entertainment, has proved to the public that this LGBT Agenda was never about "Live and Let Live", but rather "We live, and you live with it, or else."

The Republic of Singapore has every right to deem that LGBT content should not be broadcast to children. They nation and its people have every right to decide that they do not want a culture which promotes homosexual content and ideas to others, especially to children.

The ramblings of one "woke" (and possibly gay) entertainment journalist (in reality, propagandist) has little to no bearing on what will happen in the long-term in the Republic of Singapore. To be candid, more countries, more movie attendees should follow Singapore's lead and take a firmer stance toward censoring such perverse LGBT content in movies, television programs, but especially in cartoons and any other content geared toward a younger audience.

Thursday, December 26, 2019

Teen Vogue Markets Anal Sex on Christmas Day


This not a parody, nor a lampoon.

This actually happened.

It's sickening. It's disgusting. It's child abuse.

Teen Vogue is actually printing articles teaching young people about anal sex.

There is nothing to describe how perverse this is. None.

And Teen Vogue promoted this perversion on Christmas Day.

One can only hope that these trash tabloids are going bankrupt very soon, and that they resort to publishing such perversion only because they have nothing left to lose.

Parents should take every step to prevent such dissolute information from being disseminated to their children. There should be no normalization of such sexual degradation.

Why would anyone publication go to such lengths to weaken young minds and corrupt them to accept such destructive practices?

Tuesday, December 24, 2019

No Gay Gene, Declares Nature.com (God's Word Had Made This Clear Long Beforehand, Of Course!)


Regarding homosexuality and other sexual perversions, the Laws of Nature and Nature's God had already been informed to us long ago through God's Word:

26For this cause God gave them up unto vile affections: for even their women did change the natural use into that which is against nature: 27And likewise also the men, leaving the natural use of the woman, burned in their lust one toward another; men with men working that which is unseemly, and receiving in themselves that recompence of their error which was meet. (Romans 1:26-27)

Notice that Paul the Apostle writes to the Romans about "natural affection". Here, he is indicating that God's design for each human being, their default natural position de naturis (literally, "from birth") is that a man is designed for sexual relations with a woman, and a woman is designed for sexual relations with a man.

Indeed, human beings are born for sexual relations with the opposite sex, not for "vile affections" with the same sex.

Human science and scholarship is always lagging behind God's revelation, but eventually man does arrive at understanding what God had already made plain to the world through revelation in His Word.


"The largest study to date on the genetic basis of sexuality has revealed five spots on the human genome that are linked to same-sex sexual behaviour — but none of the markers are reliable enough to predict someone’s sexuality.

"The findings, which are published on 29 August in Science and based on the genomes of nearly 500,000 people, shore up the results of earlier, smaller studies and confirm the suspicions of many scientists: while sexual preferences have a genetic component, no single gene has a large effect on sexual behaviours.

“There is no ‘gay gene’,” says lead study author Andrea Ganna, a geneticist at the Broad Institute of MIT and Harvard in Cambridge, Massachusetts."

As both the sacred and now finally the secular sources declare that homosexuality is neither genetic nor natural, therefore I share with every MassResistance member and supporter:

Please present this information to every person you can every chance you get.

If there was needed any evidence to confirm to the general public that which we have known since the beginning, this comprehensive summary proves it.

Image result for there is no gay gene

There is no gay gene.

People are not born gay.

There is no scientific basis for recognizing homosexuality as an immutable characteristic.

Because it's clearly unnatural, in that individuals are not born "that way," we can properly assert that 
homosexual behavior violates the Laws of Nature and Nature's God.

The United States Constitution recognizes the Laws of Nature through the reference "law of nations", which is found in Article 1, Section 8, Clause 10.

James Wilson, an established legal scholar who signed the Declaration of Independence and the United States Constitution, asserted the following regarding the law of nations and its connection with the laws of nature:

"The law of nature, when applied to states or political societies, receives a new name, that of the law of nations." (James Wilson, Of the Law of Nations, Lectures on Law)

The United States Supreme Court undermined the rule of law in imposing false marriage, based on the false premise that homosexual behavior is another static status, like ethnicity or sex. The United States Constitution enshrines protection for the Laws of Nature and Nature's God. The Supreme Court had no right to undermine the fundamental laws of nature in order to provide another benefit, or another right to sodomy, and furthermore to undermine and redefine marriage outside of its natural dimensions: one man and one woman.

The Supreme Court of the United States must revist Lawrence v. Texas and Obergfell v. Hodges. Those rulings are in flagrant violation of the United States Constitution, and they must be overturned.

Furthermore, President Donald J. Trump should abandon any further efforts to support decriminalization of homosexualty, a behavior which is naturally destructive and in violation of the laws of nature.

Saturday, December 21, 2019

AIDS Was Originally GRIDS: Gay Related Immuno-Deficiency Syndrome

In June 1982, a group of cases among gay men in Southern California suggested that the cause of the immune deficiency was sexual and the syndrome was initially called gay-related immune deficiency (or GRID).6 Later that month, the disease was reported in haemophiliacs and Haitians leading many to believe it had originated in Haiti.7 8 In September, the CDC used the term 'AIDS' (acquired immune deficiency syndrome) for the first time.

It's one of the worst-kept secrets out there.

In the early 1980s, when AIDS was exposed to the larger public, the scientific community wanted to call in GRIDS.



That says it all. Yes, "Gay Related Immuno-Deficiency Syndrome."

Need one say more?

Of course, because of the perverse dictates of political correctness, the name was changed to AIDS.

The vast majority of people suffering from the malady at the outset of its outbreak in the United States were ... homosexuals.

That says it all. GRIDS should have been the name.

Sunday, December 15, 2019

LGBT Folly: Democratic Values are Not Homosexual Values

The young Joshua Wong is so mistaken about the true nature of liberty.

Democracy is not the answer to protecting liberty. Constitutional republicanism, that preserves liberty

Thursday, December 12, 2019

BREAKING: MassResistance Faces Outrageous Push to Cover Up Sex-Ed Materials in Torrance Unified School District


BREAKING: Outrageous Push to Cover Up Sex-Ed Materials in South Bay Community in Los Angeles County

California District Refuses to Let MassResistance Photograph, Record Sex-Ed Curriculum
Full Report Here!

On December 10, 2019, Arthur Schaper, our Activism Director, attended a meeting to look at the sex-ed curriculum which his local school district had adopted.

Torrance, California is a relatively quiet suburb located in the southwestern section of Los Angeles County. The school district is well-known for hiring good teachers and providing a safe learning environment for students. Many parents pay top dollar to move into the city of Torrance in order to enroll their students in Torrance Unified.


Torrance Unified Education Material Building
Arthur had submitted a number of FOIA requests to the Torrance Unified District to get more information about the student enrollment and to find out what the district was teaching students from K-12 in connection with the California Healthy Youth Act (AB 329).
The District was slow to respond to Arthur’s requests initially. Arthur had to refile the FOIA request to know which sex-ed curriculum they had selected. Finally, the school district got back to him, and they scheduled a time for him to look over the sex-ed curriculum.
December 10, 2019
Arthur arrived at the Torrance Unified School District Education Services office, right across the street from the district main office.
When he entered the building, he was greeted by two staffers, who then directed him to the Categorical Funding Specialist, Orly David, who was going to show him the different curricula that Torrance Unified had adopted for sex ed.
For the record, a categorical funding specialist directs and facilitates the implementation of state and federal programs. Much of these monies come from different grants and categories.  These programs include supplemental materials for students from low-income families as well as students who do not speak English as a first language. Additionally, funding specialists help provide programs for teacher and administrator training, as well as professional development.


Categorical Funding Specialist Orly David
Mr. David was friendly, and invited him up to the second floor into another meeting room. As soon as they arrived, David asked Arthur if he was familiar with the rules, i.e. what he would and would not be allowed to do in connection with the curriculum.

Arthur asked “What’s going on?”

David then explained to Arthur that he would not be allowed to take photos of the curriculum!
This was really shocking to Arthur, since he had been able to take photos and record the content of the sex-ed curriculum at the Downey Unified School District. When pressed to explain why Arthur would not be allowed to record or take photos, David responded: “Those are the orders that I have been given.”



Positive Prevention Plus is WORSE
than Teen Talk according to a number of sources
Sex-Ed for Elementary School?!



Who gave the orders? Ramona Cheng, the Director of Curriculum at Torrance Unified School District.

Arthur brought Brian Camenker, the President of MassResistance, into the conversation by speaker phone. Brian was livid, and he demanded to know why Torrance Unified would not permit Arthur to take photos and record video, but Downey Unified had allowed him to.

When Arthur took out his camera to record, David right away took the materials away!


Dr. Ramona Chang of Torrance Unified (Click here for video)
At this point, Dr. Ramona Chang  was brought into the room vias speaker phone, as well. She told Arthur that she could look at the curriculum, but he would not be permitted to take photos or record the curriculum.

Here’s the entire interaction below:


Dr. Chang explained that because the materials were copyrighted, no one would be permitted to take photos or record video. This makes no sense, since school materials are funded by public dollars. 

Doesn’t the public have a right to know and share information that will be taught to their students? Like David, Dr. Chang hid behind the color of authority, informing Arthur that Dr. Katie Krumpe, the Chief Academic Officer for Torrance Unified, had ordered all staffers that no one would be allowed to take photos or record video of the curriculum.

This is really strange, since Arthur had already taken photos of the sex-ed curriculum used in Downey Unified. Furthermore, the California Healthy Youth Act and the Fair Use Doctrine connected to federal copyright laws disputes all of this.

Key sections of the California Healthy Youth Act read as follows (with key portions highlighted:

"The Legislature intends to create a streamlined process to make it easier for parents and guardians to review materials and evaluation tools related to comprehensive sexual health education and HIV prevention education
"At the beginning of each school year... The notice shall do all of the following: Advise the parent or guardian that written and audiovisual educational materials used in comprehensive sexual health education and HIV prevention education are available for inspection....

Here’s Information about the Fair Use Doctrine in Copyright laws:

Fair use is a legal doctrine that promotes freedom of expression by permitting the unlicensed use of copyright-protected works in certain circumstances. Section 107 of the Copyright Act provides the statutory framework for determining whether something is a fair use and identifies certain types of uses—such as criticism, comment, news reporting, teaching, scholarship, and research—as examples of activities that may qualify as fair use.  Section 107 calls for consideration of the following four factors in evaluating a question of fair use:
  • Purpose and character of the use, including whether the use is of a commercial nature or is for nonprofit educational purposes:  Courts look at how the party claiming fair use is using the copyrighted work, and are more likely to find that nonprofit educational and noncommercial uses are fair.  This does not mean, however, that all nonprofit education and noncommercial uses are fair and all commercial uses are not fair; instead, courts will balance the purpose and character of the use against the other factors below. 

  • Amount and substantiality of the portion used in relation to the copyrighted work as a whole:  Under this factor, courts look at both the quantity and quality of the copyrighted material that was used. If the use includes a large portion of the copyrighted work, fair use is less likely to be found; if the use employs only a small amount of copyrighted material, fair use is more likely. That said, some courts have found use of an entire work to be fair under certain circumstances. And in other contexts, using even a small amount of a copyrighted work was determined not to be fair because the selection was an important part—or the “heart”—of the work.

  • Effect of the use upon the potential market for or value of the copyrighted work:  Here, courts review whether, and to what extent, the unlicensed use harms the existing or future market for the copyright owner’s original work. In assessing this factor, courts consider whether the use is hurting the current market for the original work (for example, by displacing sales of the original) and/or whether the use could cause substantial harm if it were to become widespread.

According to the criteria listed above, MassResistance had every right to take photos and record video of the sex-ed programs selected by Torrance Unified. Our intent has always been to inform and educate the public about the sex-ed programs that schools are pushing on children. Based on our motives and results, MassResistance activists have every right to take photos and record video of school materials.

Arthur reached out to a fellow activist who has documented curriculum materials in other school districts, as well. Even though she faced a great deal of opposition from school boards and administrators, she would record anyway, and no one stopped her.

At the Torrance Unified School District, however, Orly David intervened and took the curriculum materials away right away. Dr. Chang asked Arthur  over the speaker phone if he would be content to just looking at the curriculum or leave.  Arthur requested to speak with Dr. Krumpe, but she was not available. Since the district would not allow Arthur to photograph or videotape the curriculum, Arthur decided to leave.



However, he recorded his interaction with Mr. David and other staffers:

Mr. David complained about his privacy being violated. However, school districts are public entities, and staff and curriculum are funded by public dollars. Right-to-know should trump any public official’s demand for privacy, especially when it comes to teaching perverted material to children all under the label of sex-ed.

Follow-Up

School districts around the country face increasing pressure for lobbyists and non-profits to promote certain agendas. The LGBT movement has been relying on these groups for a long time to force their way into public schools, and in turn to find ways to indoctrinate students into accepting sexual deviance an other perversions as appropriate and mainstream.

MassResistance is committed to exposing everything about this destructive agenda forcing its way into every aspect of our communities and our culture. For now, MassResistance is going to explore what legal options are available for pursuing Torrance Unified regarding this stunning amount of secrecy around Positive Prevention Plus and Puberty Talk. For a district to go to such lengths to hide the sex-ed curriculum that they are giving to children, it certainly suggests that that there is something very sinister and wrong about what they want to teach Torrance youth.



Sunday, December 8, 2019

MassResistance: “World AIDS Day” vs. the Truth

“World AIDS Day” vs. the Truth

Schoolchildren - and society - are being given deadly messages for the sake of political correctness and a radical movement

December 8, 2019
ALT TEXT One of the logos for World AIDS Day 2019. The well-crafted message is about everyone around the world loving each other - NOT about avoiding the behaviors that cause AIDS!
On December 1, the 21st annual “World AIDS Day” was observed around the globe – particularly in schools and on college campuses. Except for “Pride Month” in June, it is the LGBT movement’s biggest ideological push on society. It is also the most dishonest – in a deadly way.
LGBT activists, and their enablers in the medical establishment, hope that playing the sympathy card will cover up the fact that the biggest risk for getting HIV/AIDS is still anal intercourse – the prime sex practice of “men who have sex with men” (i.e., “gays,” bisexual men, and other men who practice sodomy).
For over a decade, MassResistance has fought back and tried to educate people about this. We recommend our 2017 book, The Health Hazards of Homosexuality, for an in-depth treatment of the subject no one else wants to touch.
[Caution: Some graphic descriptions below.]

The worldwide AIDS problem

HIV/AIDS is a horrible disease that brings a slow, excruciating death. About 1.2 million people in the US have HIV. Nearly 38 million people around the world are infected. Almost 2 million more people contract it annually, including about 40,000 in the US.
The disease is spread overwhelmingly through homosexual behavior. Two-thirds of new HIV/AIDS cases are from male-to-male homosexual sex, i.e., sodomy (anal intercourse). About one-quarter of new infections are from heterosexual sex – usually a female getting it from an infected male. Seven percent of new cases are from injecting drugs using infected (shared) needles. 
Shockingly, about 21 percent of all the new HIV/AIDS cases are in young people ages 13-24 (primarily males).
As many as 1/6 of people with HIV/AIDS are unaware that they have it, so they are likely spreading it to others. Of those who know they are infected, only two-thirds are taking anti-HIV medications to attempt to “control” the disease so it does not progress to AIDS.
The real cause of the spread of AIDS is something that society must not ignore!

The “World AIDS Day” propaganda machine

As with everything else it does, instead of telling people the truth, the powerful LGBT movement uses “World AIDS Day” as a propaganda tool. It is largely targeted at young people whom – they hope – will not be dissuaded from partaking in anal sex. Rather than talking about how the disease is spread, they create an emotional campaign portraying HIV-positive people as victims of a cruel and heartless society.
For example, the Human Rights Campaign, the world’s largest LGBT organization, prominently promotes “A Student’s Guide to World AIDS Day.” It describes the “fight” against HIV/AIDS:
World AIDS Day is an opportunity for students in the United States and abroad to show their support for people living with and affected by HIV … it is particularly important for college and university students to make their voices heard and organize efforts to raise HIV awareness on their campuses.
It steers students into unproductive activities such as holding a candlelight vigil, displaying an AIDS quilt, setting up a kissing booth, and giving speeches about people living with AIDS.
It also sugests outrageously misguided (and potentially dangerous) activities such as:
Organize a health fair where students can learn how to have safer and more pleasurable sex ... it might be a good idea to order condoms and lube and make them available to your attendees.

What people are NOT being told

People are not being told that all homosexual sex is a dangerous perversion that should be completely avoided. As recently as 2009, the U.S. Food & Drug Administration website still posted former Surgeon General Koop’s warning that “anal intercourse is simply too dangerous to practice.”
People are not learning that “gay” and bisexual men account for over 70% of new HIV infections (while comprising only 2-3% of the population).
They are also not told that in actual use condoms are highly unreliable for HIV/AIDS prevention, especially when used during anal sex.

Here’s what your children are being told instead

Young people are getting terribly dangerous messages from their schools and other authorities, as well as government-sanctioned LGBT groups.
Sex-ed courses being taught in schools are telling children that anal sex is just another “normal” form of sex (equating it with vaginal intercourse).
ALT TEXT This is from the "Teen Talk" sex-ed curriculum used in California schools. Similar lessons are in schools across America.
In addition, high schools and middle school students are repeatedly told to “use condoms” for “protection” when having anal sex.
ALT TEXT This "how to" flyer was given out at "Youth Pride" in Boston - an event for high school and middle school students. It's from BAGLY, an LGBT organization targeting children as young as 12.
ALT TEXT This package includes a condom for anal sex and anal sex lubricant. It was given out to high school and middle school students at "Youth Pride" in Boston.
ALT TEXT These "female" condoms are regularly given out to boys at Youth Pride events - to insert in their rectums before engaging in anal sex.
LGBT groups are also bombarding kids as young as middle school age to “get checked for HIV/AIDS” as frequently as possible – as if that were some kind of magic bullet.
ALT TEXT This is one of many flyers by LGBT groups offering free HIV/AIDS tests to high school and middle school students. Given out at "Youth Pride" event in Boston.
ALT TEXT Shockingly, Children's Hospital in Boston is among the worst in giving young people (ages 13 and up) the message that "safer" anal sex and "testing" will keep them healthy. A Children's Hospital representative told MassResistance that they do NOT involve the parents of minor children because it's "confidential.".
There is no attempt to dissuade people from partaking in anal sex. Rather, the implication is that it can be engaged in somewhat safely (if condoms are used and if you get tested often) – and if one contracts HIV, it’s not such a big deal anymore. This is a dangerous, deadly lie.
This bizarre flyer from the Massachusetts Department of Public Health was passed out at Youth Pride in Boston. Note that it's about "lowering" the HIV risk, not eliminating it. Note also that staying away from all sexual behavior is NOT one of the points. Plus, the pamphlet implies that one can have HIV and stay "healthy" - which is not true!

HIV/AIDS drugs being marketed as prevention – or a sort of “cure”

The U.S. Centers for Disease Control agency (CDC) is pushing the idea that “men who have sex with men” can avoid getting HIV/AIDS if they take a daily medication called PrEP. It is marketed as effectively preventing HIV nearly 100% of the time if taken as prescribed.
PrEP is being heavily promoted, and the federal government is even picking up the tab for men who don’t have prescription drug coverage. It essentially has given the green light to homosexual men to continue to engage in anal intercourse – the riskiest practice of all for contracting HIV. This message is also being told to youth.
ALT TEXT "One Pill a Day Can Help Prevent HIV." This card was passed out at Youth Pride in Boston - looking for young people to try the PrEP medication for "research" purposes.
There are also medications being marketed which aim to keep the HIV infection from progressing into full AIDS.
Much of this is, of course, experimental and dependent on no new strains of HIV.
Major drug companies are making a lot of money marketing these medicines to mitigate the disease in those who have it and prevent it in those who don’t. Given these new tools, the CDC’s hope was that the yearly number of new HIV infections would continue to decline. However, this has not happened. The CDC is now admitting that their efforts to reduce new infections has “plateaued” and that “there is a real risk of an HIV resurgence.”
They blame this partly on “complacency” about the disease (because of the new medicines) plus the uptick in injected drug use following on the opioid crisis. (So now, the HHS is now helping to fund needle exchange programs in cities around the country!)
But many find it hard to stay on HIV/AIDS medicines for a number of reasons, including the often horrible side effects. And even with these medications, their life expectancy will still likely be reduced.
This is a magazine catering to HIV-positive men. It was handed out at the Youth Pride event in Boston.
Unfortunately, young people are being led to believe that the new drugs will either entirely prevent infection, or help them to lead a “healthy” life if they do become infected. This is a deadly lie.
But how much blame should go to the failure of medical authorities everywhere to tell people to Just Say NO to anal intercourse?

MassResistance: Presenting facts and demanding action

Beyond being the main conduit for HIV/AIDS transmission, homosexual sex practices bring a wide range of other serious medical and psychological problems. Cancers, hepatitis, other sexually-transmitted diseases, tuberculosis, rectal trauma, depression, anxiety, and suicidality are all disproportionately seen in the LGBT population.
But World AIDS Day wants our conversation to focus instead on testing, condoms, “stigma,” and emotional stories about people with the disease.
Among pro-family groups, MR is virtually alone in confronting school boards and administrators and elected officials about the dangers of the LGBT lifestyle – and demanding that it should not be portrayed as “normal” in any classes or programs, and that the true medical facts be taught to our vulnerable children (and everyone else)!
For more information, we recommend our book, The Health Hazards of Homosexuality, that tells the truth about homosexual practices. Our 600-page, heavily-sourced work has been endorsed by prominent physicians and is a rare compendium on a subject that is widely censored.
ALT TEXT This is the book that every school should have!
Facebook Twitter Google Reddit Email Print
Please help us continue to do our uncompromising work!
Our successes depend on people like you.
Your support will make the difference!