James Woods is right.I blame my generation, the champions of abortion, drugs, radicalism and sexual dysphoria, if the Harris/Walz madness prevails in this election. As we matured, my generation foolishly let schools, media, and the culture itself slip into the hands of a Democrat Party even John…
— James Woods (@RealJamesWoods) November 1, 2024
Saturday, November 2, 2024
James Woods Blames the Hippie Boomers for Our Country's Demise
Sunday, June 9, 2024
SAY HIS NAME! Aurelio Mattucci Beats Recall Effort (Where's the Money, Signatures, Jean?!)
The Daily BreezeThe Daily Breeze reported the news last week, but I was getting the updates from key contacts within the city, connected to city hall.
Of course, right after he got the news (May 31, 2024), Mattucci shared the news on his Facebook page:
Jean Adelsman has failed. She was not able to get the requisite number of signatures to recall Councilman Aurelio Mattucci.
She wanted to throw out an entire election because she lost. It's just that simple. She is a sore loser, and she wanted to pass on her bitterness to the city with another costly election.
What's really galling about this whole affair is that Adelsman opposed the recall of derelict LA County District Attorney George Gascon! He should be recalled, since he is deliberately, openly violating his oath of office, breaking the law, and not doing his job.
Councilman Mattucci HAS been doing his job. Is he rough around the edges for some people? Sure. Does he ruffle feathers here and there. Yes, and that is a good thing.
There is too much in Torrance politics that aims for moderation and quiescence. It's time for elected leaders to ask questions and push against the civil service status quo.
That "status quo" approach allowed young hoodlums to terrorize the Del Amo Mall for the last two years. No, a fresh approach to leaner, more effective government in order. Let's not fool ourselves, either on this point: the city of Torrance is not ready for the next economic downturn. The city of Torrance is still top heavy with administrative civil service bloat, and spends too much money.
All of this needs to be fixed, and it is not happening fast enough.
Jean Adelsman clearly had a problem with all of these reforms, or she just couldn't stand the fact that after working as a major opinion maker (supposedly) with the Daily Breeze all these years, she didn't have the pull or the political clout to get elected! After all, she was backed by every establishment interest in the city, Republican and Democrat, people who have gone with the "go with the flow" failed mentality for so long.
Yes, she lost by sixteen votes, a very close race, to be sure, but she lost. And there is no evidence of voter fraud, ballot stuffing, voter suppression, etc. In fact, Adelsman didn't even challenge the results! She was willing to let the whole thing go. Following her loss, she even reached out to Mattucci, asking him to join her for a cup of coffee so that they could discuss city issues going forward. What a betrayal that followed!
Now, the next questions come up, and I would ask Jean Adelsman these questions directly:
1. How much money did you raise for this recall effort? We know that you raised money, so what happened to the money? We want to see the financial records!
2. How many signatures did you actually collect, Jean? In Downey, CA, voters went to great pains, including two recall efforts, to get rid of pro-LGBT felon Catherine Alvarez, and they were not afraid to reveal that they were 34 signatures short on the first round. If you were so close, Jean, TELL US! How many recall signatures did you actually collect?!
Sunday, September 3, 2023
WINNING: OC Hater Briana "Minivan Karen" Walker Blocks Me
Wow!
So much winning!
I guess Briana Walker can't handle people calling our her crap, including:
1. Supporting pornography in schools and libraries
2. Targeting mothers and fathers who want to protect their children
3. Shaming citizens who want to clean out the corruption and abuse in government schools
4. Defaming conservatives, common-sense citizens, and patriots who just want to restore public order, public health, and public safety.
I have relentlessly called out her crap and corruption. Click here.
Life is good!
Wednesday, October 19, 2022
Montana MassResistance: Say No to Kyle Waterman for SD 4 (Cringeworthy Commercial)
In a previous post, I shared with readers about Montana Democratic State Senate candidate Kyle Waterman, an openly gay, militant left-wing LGBT activist who is so out of place running in Montana, one has to wonder if he is a California-based grifter taking advantage of rich donors for an easy paycheck.
The above photo, in which he is pushing the vile, pornographic book Gender Queer, comes from one of the most cringeworthy campaign commercials I have ever seen. The fact that any politician would be stupid, or sick, enough to campaign on such abusive garbage is just the height of stupid. He is automatically unfit for office.
But the rest of his campaign "commercial" (if you can call it that), gives us plenty more reasons for Montana voters to say NO to Kyle.
Here's the link for the video.
Waterman goes out of his way to make himself seem folksy and downhome. He wants to play up his bipartisan credentials. He has too since, he's a progressive (read, communistic) Democrat running for a red state senate seat in the most conservative county in a very red state.
Check out how he juxtaposes left-wing and right-wing voters:
The left-wing activist is eating a carrot. The conservative is ... smoking a cigarette. Really? Wow, there is no bias here ...
Then the commercial points to the "one person" who can heal the partisan divide in the state:
Kyle ... Waterman that it is (as if!)
Here he wears a spiffy checkered shirt, which he probably bought one hour prior, just like Kamala Harris had posed with a brand new apron during campaign 2020. She ended up showing that she had never cooked--and Kyle Water clearly has no experience with the great outdoors.
![]() |
| This is the best that Waterman could do to attak John Fuller? Really?! |
![]() |
| "Not Fuller!" (because she's full of carrots, right?) I can think of something else she's full of .. |
Did anyone sit back and think "Maybe this is not such a good idea?"
And to really show how this whole commercial exposes what a failed, flimsy self-promotional vanity project is the Waterman campaign, consider these two lines of his campaign song:
Yoga Pants
People who are Trans:
Does Kyle Waterman really think that yoga pants and "people who are trans" are the biggest issues on Montana voters' minds?
The pollings and surveys across the COUNTRY show that people are worried about:
1. Inflation
2. Crime
3. Economic growth
Why any politcian thinks show-casing a confused man pretending to be a woman is somehow a winner is just beyond me. And yoga pants? This is a first ... I don't recall any other politician making a scene or a campaign pledge to "PROTECT YOGA PANTS!"
Folks, if you want to think bigger, and think better for Montana, don't think of Waterman.
Monday, October 3, 2022
CRA Drama: Torrance Lomita Palos Verdes RA v. San Pedro "Palos Verdes" RA?
I received this letter from the head of the Torrance-Lomita-PV Republican assembly. [See Bold Type below]
Apparently, there has been some growing drama among the different chapters in the South Bay section of Los Angeles County.
The statewide organization is allowing another chapter to open up for Palos Verdes and San Pedro, here in the South Bay. The problem, though, is that another chapter, the Torrance-Lomita-Palos Verdes Republican Assembly, worked very hard to add Palos Verdes to its jurisdiction. The bigger problem is that the state leadership is allowing this new chapter to emerge, even though the outcome will run rough-shod over state and local by-laws.
What I am starting to see from the CRA is the same kind of raw pursuit for more clubs, for more leaders, but no real commitment to winning elections or building a conservative brand to take back the state. The state organization is also not responsive to local groups, which want more flexibility when it comes to members joining the club.
Another question does arise: are the local chapters getting their money's worth for all the donations that they have to send to the state organization? Members pay $25 a member, and $10-15 of that goes to the state organization. But for what? What is it accomplishing?
If the statewide organization is not going to play by the rules, why be a member? If the state organization is not going much for local chapters and candidates, what's the point?
Here's the letter from TLPVRA President Scott Carter regarding the potential take-over of the Palos Verdes area to another assembly unity. Tell me what you think:
Dear Torrance Lomita Palos Verdes RA Members,
Currently our CRA President Johnnie Morgan, will be seeking members from our Torrance Lomita Palos Verdes Republican Assembly to be a member of the as-yet-to-be Approved "PalosVerdes San Pedro" CRA Unit.
Anyone may wish to be a member of that unit anywhere in California.
But here is the information for you to decide on:
Currently, their purpose is to just get members under the leadership of someone else and form a 'new club'.
And at the same time, he secured the same speaker slated to speak to the South Bay Republican CRA unit, before they were to meet, for 'his' other group, which was not respectful to them and in my humble opinion, unethical.
Now, undeterred by his previous conflict of interest behavior, he has been asked by CRA President Johnnie Morgan, VP Davina Keiser, SD (outside of her Senate District) Jo Reitkopf, to start a new Unit in Palos Verdes. This is despite the fact we are the only ones legitimately assigned to Palos Verdes in 2020. The fact they did not consult us on it, which says volumes as to the character of the leadership of the CRA.
Aside from that, you are free to choose if you would like to be a member
of their PVSP Unit should you decide to.
We will continue to have our Endorsements for Palos Verdes School Board and City Councils in the next meeting as well, since we have the sole jurisdiction in that area.
If you do join the Palos Verdes San Pedro Club, it is not approved
for existence yet or for CRA Endorsement of Candidates. Only the Torrance
Lomita Palos Verdes Republican Assembly is eligible and capable to
do so.
However the "Palos Verdes San Pedro Club" is meeting in TORRANCE
(outside of their 'Territory', which is against the CRA Bylaws(Sec.10) in order
to establish themselves as a CRA Unit. That is a violation.)
(But it has been violated before without repercussions by the leadership of the CRA.)
To be held at Mimi's Restaurant and you are expected to pay (our meetings are free)
for a meal ($15-20 minimum) to listen to Mr Shawn Steele (Spoke at our Group in January) and State Treasurer Candidate Jack Guerrero ( a dynamic speaker, but had schedule conflicts with us on two occasions).
If you do decide to attend the meeting they may ask you to switch membership from our Club to their Club. It is up to you.
BUT WE would really like you to stay with us to continue building our Club and continue to pursue our area wide goals for Torrance, Palos Verdes and Lomita.
Our newsletter will be coming out soon for our new meeting location,
NEW Time- 4:30pm to 6:30pm
Thank you for being a member of the Torrance Lomita Palos Verdes Republican Assembly.
Sincerely,
Republican Assembly,
CRA Senate Director District 24
Thursday, August 11, 2022
RINO Former CAGOP Vice-Chair Endorses Democrat for Central Valley Congressional Seat
If the end of the CAGOP is not upon us now, I don't know what to say.
The former Vice-Chairman of the California Republican Party, Kristin Olsen, was one more established-backed blight on the state party.
She helped orchestrate the Republican caucus' cap-and-trade betrayal in 2017.
She was having an affair with former GOP Assembly minority leader Chad Mayes, who then cheated on the state party and become an independent voting with the Democrats on a number of issues.
She then left the CAGOP Vice-Chairmanship in the middle of her term citing the challenges and time commitments she faced, but the truth is that grassroots conservatives (including yours truly) filed a censure resolution against her for her moral and political failings, and she wanted to avoid the shameful fallout.
On top of that, she got arrested for DUI, and she ended up pleading no contest. It's as if she is deeply determined to ruin the Republican brand in the state of California.
And she hasn't stopped there.
Check out this tweet from Democrat state assemblyman Adam Gray, who is running for Congress in the 13th District:
Honored to be endorsed by former CA State Assemblymember, Kristin Olsen !#adamgrayforcongress #CA13 pic.twitter.com/C90F8coYrH
— Adam C. Gray (@AdamGrayCA) August 8, 2022
With Republican sellouts like Kristin Olsen, who needs Democrats?
The California Republican Party is still governed by self-serving consultants and establishment hacks more interested in lining their pockets and filling up their social calendars instead of winning elections and getting the state of California on the right track.
When will CAGOP delegates wake up and demand structural change in leadership, too? This rampant betrayal by the CAGOP political leadership must cease!
Saturday, July 23, 2022
When President Jimmy Carter Came to Torrance
'Town Meeting' Is Carter's Centerpiece
By Edward Walsh
October 2, 1980
Jimmy Carter was never a high school basketball star. He is not tall, and even as a boy his taste in running was for the space and solitude of the distance events, not for jostling with nine other kids up and down a 74-foot strip of hardwood floor.
But now that he is a man and the president, Carter has become at home in the high school gymnasiums of America. Already in the fall campaign he has visited the gyms at Truman High School in Independence, Mo., Moody High School in Corpus Christi., Tex., and North High School in Torrance, Calif.
And today, which happened to be his 56th birthday. He was in the gym at Northern Community High School here, home of the Vikings, where he was as comfortable and at ease as any member of the girl's basketball team, winners of 56 straight, state champions the last two years.
The president was holding another of his "town meetings" and, as usual, it was an event.
The walls of the building were plastered with signs welcoming him, praising him, wishing him happy birthday. At one end of the gym, the school band sat cramped in a section of retractable wooden bleachers, poised to play "Hail to the Chief." There would be no basketball game here this afternoon, for the gym floor was covered with folding chairs where the respectful citizens of Flint would sit and listen to the president.
This was Carter's 22nd "town meeting" as president, and the fourth he has held during the one month of the general election campaign against Republican Ronald Reagan. The president told the cheering crowd that it was no accident he decided to come today to Flint, where he ended his 1976 campaign.
It is also no accident that the "town meeting" -- a format in which the president makes opening and closing statements and in between answers about a dozen questions from randomly selected citizens -- has become the centerplace, the main event, of the Carter campaign on the road.
The president is running as tightly a controlled campaign, and is at least as shielded from questions from the traveling press, as is Reagan. But it is part of Carter strategy to portray Reagan as a man out of his intellectual depth when it comes to national issues and to accuse the GOP nominee, as Carter did in a speech Tuesday night, of being "muzzled" by a staff that does his thinking for him.
The "town meeting" is the device the White House has hit up to contrast the "open" president with his "muzzled" opponent. Carter has used the device since the beginning of his presidency. He is more comfortable with it than with news conferences, and he is extremely skillful in exploiting the format.
Like other presidents before him, Carter has also said he gets better questions from ordinary citizens at these sessions than he does from Washington reporters. That, occasionally, is the case, but it is also true the questions posed at a "town meeting" can be as silly and shallow as any asked during a White House news conference.
Today's hour-long "town meeting" at Northern Community High was another virtuoso performance.
The first questioner, who began her inquiry about Cuban refugees in Spanish, gave the president a chance to show off his knowledge of Spanish, which won applause.
And elderly woman said she was concerned about the future of senior citizens, to which the president replied, "A lot of the future life for senior citizens will depend on the decisions that will be made in the ballot boxes of voting places on Nov. 4." He then launched into a discourse on his devotion to the Social Security System and other issues of particular concern to the elderly.
A man complained that Flint had not received due recognition as an automobile manufacturing center. Carter quickly agreed, expressed sympathy for the city's economic woes, and concluded by saying: " i was invited to meet here to have a man-to-man debate with Gov. Reagan. I'm here -- and anytime he's willing to meet me back here on a two-man debate proposition, I'll make my sixth visit to Flint, Mich."
Almost nothing fazes the president at a "town meeting" not even the two questions posed today about the economy of Flint, where last summer the unemployment rate hit almost 26 percent and where more than 22,000 people are still out of work, according to the Detroit Free Press.
Nor was Carter rattled by the truck driver who challenged administration policy on a complex issue involving umemployment benefits for workers in industries, such as trucking, that are indirectly affected by foreign imports. There was no suggestion of a change in policy from the president. Instead, he asked the man for his name and address so he could "go back and talk to the secretary of labor and give you a call."
The crowd loved it. They loved it when Marlene Laro, 9, asked Carter to explain "the difference between the Republicans and you so I can tell my parents how to vote." And they loved it when Carter, after his long answer to Marlene that he was more than happy to provide, shed his suit coat, a regular part of the theater at these events.
At the end, the
crowd in the gym stood and sang "happy Birthday" to the president.
With a broad grin, Carter thanked them and then he was gone. He is off Thursday
to Dayton, Ohio, for another "town meeting."
Thursday, June 23, 2022
Schaper Derangement Syndrome: Torrance Community Group Admin Jen "Karen" Graham Attacks Me as "Local Agitator"
Jen Graham is one of the Administrators for the "Torrance Community Group."
Here's here profile picture:
You can visit her Facebook profile here.
I have no idea who this lady is, and I really don't know what her problem is, but she is really fixated on me. It's kind of weird, even a little disturbing, but in the end, it's pretty funny. I must live in her head rent-free, and she is a classic example of "Schaper Derangement Syndrome."
In case you cannot read the full comments on her Facebook books in the "Torrance Community Group," I will reprint them below for you (Here's the original link on Facebook):
I know that several of you are familiar
with local agitator and bigot, Arthur Schaper. He is known to post libelous
posts of local residents on his blog, and is a paid agitator for a national
hate group.
The stories of Arthur are foul and far too
numerous to add here. But I will say, he has done hit pieces on some local
teachers, and the fall out was pretty awful. I have been told that at least one
of the teachers went out on mental health leave.
More recently he posted yet another
libelous hit piece on a friend of mine, and I hope that something will finally
be done to stop him from his campaign of hate.
Why am I mentioning this you ask? Well, did
you know that both Aurelio Mattucci and Mayoral Candidate George Chen supported
Arthur on his last failed bid for state Assembly? Arthur also proudly supports
George Chen, including donating to George's current campaign for mayor.
I don't know about you, but I would have serious doubts about a mayoral candidate who support Arthur Schaper, and I think you should too. This alone in my mind makes it clear that Cliff Numark is the only valid candidate for mayor.
In the comments I will link to an LA Times
article that a journalist wrote about Arthur,. (Arthur's response to the
article by the way was to harrass [sic] and torment the journalist in such a
way that the LA Times will never do an article about him again.
There is so much to unpack here. Where do I start? Right at the beginning, of course!
"I know that several of you are familiar with local agitator and bigot, Arthur Schaper."
Wow, I live in many of their heads rent free! And they all know who I am, whoever they are ...
"Local agitator." What's wrong with agitating for what is good? From abolition of slavery to fighting for life at all stages, agitation is part of what makes America great. Would Jen Graham prefer to live in some third-world dictatorship, where people are routinely mowed down, gunned down, or locked up for speaking out?
I guess being labeled a local agitator is a real compliment. It's strange, though, that she mentions a "national hate group." Wouldn't that make me a national agitator, too?
And there's this constant refrain of "bigot." What is a "bigot" exactly? They keep using that word, but ...
So, here's a definition of a "bigot":
a person who is obstinately or unreasonably attached to a belief, opinion, or faction, especially one who is prejudiced against or antagonistic toward a person or people on the basis of their membership of a particular group.
Frankly, I do not subscribe to this nonsense. My views are based on reason and research, so they are not unreasonable. However, the vitriol which Jen Graham and her coterie of haters spew at me sure meets the above definition.
And I must remind the reader that the Administrators for Torrance Community Group refused to let me join. Sounds pretty bigoted, if you ask me ...
The stories of Arthur are foul and far too numerous to add here. But I will say, he has done hit pieces on some local teachers, and the fall out was pretty awful. I have been told that at least one of the teachers went out on mental health leave.
It's interesting that she does not list "the stories" that I have written. I have exposed a number of teachers in Torrance Unified, however, who are pushing their indoctrinary agenda in the classroom instead of actually teaching their students. Teachers are not supposed to push viewpoint discrimination of any kind, but they are supposed to actually ... wait for it ... TEACH!
In fact, many of the teachers whom I have exposed remind me of a person who is attached to an irrational point of view, and is not interested in any other point of view. That sounds like bigotry, doesn't it?!
If a teacher went out on mental health leave because I exposed the things that he or she was doing in the classroom, then I guess I made a good point. If a teacher is not doing anything wrong in the classroom, why would he or she feel threatened frightened, or upset in some way?
It's good to know that what I have written about some of the really bad teachers in Torrance Unified is having an impact. What is more important, however, is that parents in the city are grateful that I have given them a voice, because many of them fear the retaliation against their own children if they speak up.
More recently he posted yet another libelous hit piece on a friend of mine, and I hope that something will finally be done to stop him from his campaign of hate.
What strikes me as so funny about Jen "Karen" Graham's whining and complaining is that she is guilty of the very things that she accuses me of. She is waging a campaign of hate right then and there with her Facebook post, as have other people in the city on other social media groups.
What really bothers deranged Karens like Jen Graham is that unlike most people, I "punch back," hitting the angry, hateful people who attack me with their own words and hold them accountable for their hate. Most people on the left, or people who turn into apoplectic bigots generally, do not like being confronted when they bully others. Jen Graham is no different. I am glad to see that she is feeling the heat, and I do not apologize for confronting people who push falsehoods and spiteful, personal attacks against other Torrance residents. For the record, this kind of catty indecency towards others is all too common in South Bay politics here in Los Angeles County. What makes me stand out is that I am not afraid of people saying mean things about me, since I have no problem throwing it right back at them. Sometimes, you do have to fight fire with fire, or as the Bible says:
"Answer a fool according to his folly, lest he be wise in his own conceit." (Proverbs 26:5)
There's a lot of folly and conceit in Torrance Community Group, and I am answering them!
And once again, telling the truth is not "hate," unless you a Karen like Jen Graham.
Why am I mentioning this you ask? Well, did you know that both Aurelio Mattucci and Mayoral Candidate George Chen supported Arthur on his last failed bid for state Assembly? Arthur also proudly supports George Chen, including donating to George's current campaign for mayor.
This is not true.
If "supported," Graham means endorsed, only Councilman Aurelio Mattucci enodrsed my campaign for state assembly. And unlike some adults, I hold no ill will towards anyone for choosing not to endorse my campaign. By the way, I earned more votes in 2020 compared to the previous Republican nominee in 2018, who had also spent $1.5 million!
There's a contigent of voters out there would liked what I had to say and share, and I could have done better if I could have raised more money.
Also, I was indeed proud to support Councilman Chen's campaign for mayor. I feel great vindication in this, because now Councilman Chen is MAYOR CHEN! It looks like I know how to pick good candidates to represent the city of Torrance. Thanks for the "compliment," Jen!
I don't know about you, but I would have serious doubts about a mayoral candidate who support Arthur Schaper, and I think you should too. This alone in my mind makes it clear that Cliff Numark is the only valid candidate for mayor.
In truth, we should have serious doubts about anyone who thinks that Mayor Chen is not fit for office based on who supports him. Mayor Chen was twice elected to city council, first at-large, and then in District Two. He defeated an incumbent both times in his bid for city council. Then he defeated a well-funded machine candidate, Cliff Numark, who had the backing of a number of labor unions in and around the city. Numark quit his job representing the city council so that he could serve on the El Camino College Board. He did not take a clear stance on key issues facing the city, and judging by some of his weak rhetoric and unfounded against against George Chen, he was not ready for the prime-time responsibility of serving as Torrance Mayor.
The fact is that lots of people found George Chen to be the best man for the job. Despite Graham's attempts to shame me, the fact is that she has further established my credibility in the city. I am really proud to have supported Mayor Chen's bid for mayor, and I am glad that a solid majority of people in the city of Torrance agreed with me.
In the comments I will link to an LA Times article that a journalist wrote about Arthur,. (Arthur's response to the article by the way was to harrass [sic] and torment the journalist in such a way that the LA Times will never do an article about him again.
First of all, the Los Angeles Times (by their own admission) is a racist newspaper. They admitted it in a broad editorial and an open letter from the newspaper's new owner, Patrick Soon-Shiong.
Second of all, the article clearly WAS a hit piece, and thankfully other residents in the city slam or shame anyone who references that article as though it was seriously journalism. One person calmly pointed out that the article is over five years old. And yet the "SDS" Karens in the Torrance Community Group still reference it? They really do have issues, don't then?
Third, Jen needs to use spellcheck. "Harrass"? Really?
Fourth, "torment" is the term she used. What is this, the Spanish Inquisition? She offers nothing to suggest what exactly she is talking about regarding the article or the person who wrote it. For the record, because the article was a hateful hit piece, I had friends and supporters from around the country contact her, demanding retractions and corrections. The same reporter has a personal website, in which she promotes notorious anti-semite and terrorist sympathizer Helen Thomas. The reporter who attacked me looked up to that same hateful press corps agent Thomas, the same woman who said "The Jews should get the hell out of Palestine!" I can't believe any so-called journalist would tolerate a bigot like Helen Thomas. And yes, she was a bigot, because she had tolerance of Jews (or Christians) living in Israel, and she said unreservedly that they should be removed from the country that they have lawfully entered or lived in or were born.
I simply called out the reporter's hypocrisy. That's not torment. That is the power of the press. If she could not take it, then she should not have dished it out.
If that is not bigotry, I don't know what is. If you want more information, check this post.
Last of all, I am glad that my pressure campaign against that terrible LA Times journalist presumably paid off. These propagandists disguised as journalists need to be held accountable for defaming and shaming everyday people who share their views and fight for what they believe in. If they have a problem with people exercising their First Amendment rights, then what business do they have writing for newspapers--even if no one reads them anymore?
This post from Jen "Karen" Graham is vintage proof of "Schaper Derangement Syndrome," but the comments underneath it were even more entertaining! More to follow!
Tuesday, February 1, 2022
Wyoming MassResistance: Standing Up to Rude, Abusive Library Board
Wyoming County Library Board passes hostile (and illegal) public comments policy, then uses it to terminate meeting
Board shuts down citizen’s appeal vs. inappropriate children’s book. Claim speaker was "disrespectful."
Follows resignation of Library Board Chairman – after months of Wyoming MassResistance pressure
Board members continue to side with Library Director against parents
Community pressure continues
February 1, 2022
New Library Board Chairman Charlie Anderson (center) reads aloud his proposed "public comment policy" at the Dec. 20 meeting.These days, radical public library officials will do almost anything – even break the law – to intimidate and discourage citizens from attempting to stop their abuses against children. In Campbell County, Wyoming, MassResistance community activists have been relentlessly taking a stand to stop their public library officials from foisting LGBT pornography and other inappropriate books on young children and teens.
But our activists are learning that relentless pressure pays off.
Library Board chairman steps down
On Dec. 20, 2021, the Campbell County Library Board opened their meeting with a new chairman, Charlie Anderson.
His predecessor, Dr. Hollie Stewart, had abruptly resigned as chairman soon after the November meeting but continues to serve as a Board member. According to people we spoke to, she had been complaining bitterly to members of the County Commission about having to run Board meetings with the ongoing anger from Wyoming MassResistance parents over the offensive children’s books.
Left to right: Library Board members Mandy Steward, Miranda Finn, former chairman Dr. Hollie Stewart, Nancy Stovall, and new chairman Charlie Anderson.Odious new “public comment” policy
Anderson’s first action as new chairman was to introduce a new restrictive “public comment” policy. This high-handed tactic is being used across the country by public officials to insulate themselves from the outrage brought on by their arrogant actions.
Anderson read his proposed policy aloud. (See our transcription here.) It states that public comment at meetings is not a legal right, but a privilege granted by the Board. The policy was developed after (supposed) “personal attacks directed at this Board.”
The policy bans “inappropriate comments or behavior.” Inappropriate behavior is defined as “attempting to engage individual Board members in conversation” and “insults.” It also lists “obscenities, or profanity and/or physical violence or any threat thereof” as well as “attacks against any person in their personal capacity” (which is unclear). But to imply that concerned parents would engage in profanity, physical violence, or threats is absurd.
The policy outlines a series of steps for enforcement: (1) The chairman rules the speaker out of order. (2) If the behavior continues, the speaker will be asked to leave. (3) If inappropriate conduct continues, the chairman may “entertain a motion to end public comment and adjourn the meeting.” It also limits speakers in public comment to three minutes, an absurdly short time for that kind of body.
Anderson said that he and Sean Brown, the (liberal) assistant County Attorney jointly put together the policy. (Perhaps they were inspired by U.S. Attorney General Merrick Garland’s memo casting parents who dare to speak up as domestic terrorists.)
The Library Board unanimously approved the policy.
Illegal under Wyoming Law?
It would certainly appear that this policy is illegal under Wyoming law. Wyoming statute 16-4-406 states that in the event of “disruption of public meetings” a body may (a) have the person or persons removed and continue the session; or (b) recess the meeting and reconvene to another location and continue with the agenda. It does not give the option of simply adjourning the meeting. But like most leftists, Charlie Anderson and Sean Brown decided to devise their own set of rules.
Using new policy to suddenly shut down the meeting!
On the Dec. 20 meeting’s agenda were appeals to the Library Board by local citizens. They sought to remove four books whose challenges had been rejected by the library staff.
We’ve already reported on the appeal of the first book Trans Mission, a sickening, pornographic LGBT book for teenagers that the Board nevertheless voted to keep in the shelves.
The other three books were being appealed by Kevin, the son of two great Wyoming MassResistance activists. Kevin got right to work.
His first appeal was on the book, The Babysitter’s Coven. Following the trend of anti-Christian children’s books, it is a slick teenagers’ introduction to occult and satanic beliefs and symbolism which encourages teenagers to explore further. (It’s no wonder so many young people are drawn into Satanism.) The plot also includes a man abducting girls and holding them in a basement. It encourages underage drinking and drug use (two issues affecting teenagers in Campbell County). This portrayal of repulsive people who do nasty things has no redeeming value.

Kevin described how reviewers – which the library uses in their “collection” process – were not impressed by this book. He quoted one mainstream reviewer saying, “I am not really comfortable recommending a young teen to read this book.”
Kevin begins his presentation of "The Babysitter's Coven" to the Board on Dec. 20 as local parents seated behind him look on.A few minutes into Kevin’s presentation, some of the Board members were clearly getting uncomfortable. They rudely started interrupting Kevin. Charlie Anderson grilled him about Lord of the Rings, a book that was not relevant to the conversation. It seemed like a hostile cross-examination. Then Anderson started berating him for bringing up the book reviews. When Kevin started to answer him, Board member Miranda Finn suddenly jumped in:
Charlie Anderson: I was hoping you’d talk about the book that we’re here to discuss.
Kevin: That’s what I’ve been doing. I’m using data and sources to back up what I’m saying so I’m not just bubbling effervescent from my face here. I’m trying to actually use some facts here.
Miranda Finn: Mr. Chairman, we’ve reached the point where disrespect is being displayed. I move to adjourn the meeting.
Immediately then, Anderson called for a vote to adjourn. There were four “Aye” votes. (He did not ask if there were any “Nay” votes. Mandy Steward later told him that she was a “Nay” vote.) Anderson quickly declared the meeting adjourned.
A violation of the policy they had just passed
This was in violation of the policy they had just passed! Before adjourning the meeting, they should have first (1) ruled Kevin out of order, then (2) asked him to leave. They did neither.
Also, the basis of the adjournment was that “disrespect is being displayed” by Kevin. But “disrespect” is not part of their definition of inappropriate behavior. Kevin did not actually violate anything.
All this shows how contemptible and loathsome these people are.
At the January Board meeting Kevin was allowed to continue
At the January 24, 2022 meeting of the Library Board, the arrogance continued. But Kevin’s persistence clearly had them rattled, and he was not letting up.
At the beginning of the meeting, Kevin requested that they read the Wyoming statute on “disruption of public meetings” which clearly contradicts their new policy. Anderson asked one of the staff members to read it aloud. The staffer did, but the Board didn’t react at all and just continued with their meeting.
They allowed Kevin to finish his three book appeals. The other two books were A Quick and Easy Guide to Queer and Trans Identities and Music from Another World. Both books intend to draw young teenagers into homosexuality. They portray homosexual relationships and sex as normal and very desirable.

This time the Board let Kevin finish his presentations. Immediately afterwards, the Board allowed the Library Director to deliver a “rebuttal” to Kevin’s appeal. Much of that was the boilerplate text from her previous rebuttal in December.
Then, to no one’s surprise, the Board voted 4-1 to reject all of Kevin’s appeal, with Mandy Steward being the holdout.
And then came public comment - parents blast Board!
The Board was not in the clear yet. They got pummeled during the public comment section.
Citizen after citizen got up and blasted the Board for doing nothing to get rid of the terrible books, and the staff who have been selecting the books. One woman pointed out that the efforts of the Wyoming MassResistance team are inspiring other people around the country to press forward, demand answers from their local libraries, and get harmful books removed. At one point, a woman who identified herself as a retired librarian pointed out that the local newspaper has applauded the Library Director. Kevin got up and reminded her that the newspaper differs from the community on most issues, including this.
This woman talked about being part of Wyoming MassResistance and travelling around the state, and that people knew about this battle: “I hear some positive stories and it’s so exciting. Because of us, people have taken on their own libraries. And they’re getting things done! Books are being removed!" she said.Final thoughts
Decades ago, most states across the country passed laws exempting schools, libraries, and museums from laws banning obscenity (as harmful to minors). This was done in the interest of protecting legitimate artwork that sometimes portrayed nudity. But now, radical staff members and public officials are using that as cover to push pornography onto children in schools and libraries. (Attempts to overturn these laws in some states have been strongly opposed by teachers’ unions and LGBT groups.)
Regarding the issue of “disrespecting” officials: In a famous 1964 case (New York Times v Sullivan) the US Supreme Court opined that America has a "profound national commitment to the principle that debate on public issues should be uninhibited, robust, and wide-open, and that it may well include vehement, caustic, and sometimes unpleasantly sharp attacks on government and public officials."
When public officials declare that they and their actions are above criticism by ordinary citizens, we all need to get very upset. These people have no morals and no conscience. They deserve parents’ disrespect. We will certainly not be intimidated by them.
There’s a lot more to come from Campbell County, Wyoming!

Please help us continue to do our uncompromising work!
Our successes depend on people like you.
Your support will make the difference!
Wednesday, September 1, 2021
MassResistance Interviews Member of Canadian Parliament: Chilling Interview on Legislative Push for LGBT Agenda in Canada
MassResistance interviews Canadian Member of Parliament about two extreme bills that would oppress pro-family Christians across the country.
A frightening insight into what is happening in Canada – and what could be coming to the rest of the world.
September 1, 2021
Derek Sloan is a Canadian Member of Parliament representing a district in the province of Ontario in the House of Commons. He is greatly admired across the country for being a strong pro-family conservative.
He was elected in 2019 as a member of the Conservative Party (which unfortunately is not really conservative). He recently became an Independent because his principled pro-family stands on the issues turned the Conservative Party leadership against him and they concocted a reason to force him out!
MP Sloan told us that he appreciates the work that MassResistance did to expose what was happening to Rob Hoogland. He was pleased to speak with us about two horrendous bills that were introduced in the House of Commons which have shocked Canadians across the country:
Bill C-6 would effectively ban so-called “anti-LGBT conversion therapy” in all forms, including discussions by pastors and ministers and even admonitions by parents to their children. It is possibly the broadest such bans in the world that would cover an entire nation. Violations of the law would carry outrageous punishments, including fines and prison terms of up to five years. The legislation would appear to contradict Canada’s Charter of Rights and Freedoms, i.e., their national constitution.
Bill C-36 is an expansive and tyrannical “hate crimes” bill that would make almost any ambiguous online criticism of the LGBT movement or other anti-family cause a federal crime carrying severe punishments. It even allows punishment of people who have a “potential” to post hate speech online. In addition, the law could be applied retroactively.
MP Sloan discussed how these two bills got such momentum and the manipulative forces behind them. He also gave us a fascinating insider’s view of the political climate in the Canadian Parliament and in Canada in general regarding the “culture war.” He was interviewed by Arthur Schaper, our National Organization Director.
In particular, MP Sloan walked us through how the LGBT movement used a strategy of lies and fear tactics to push Bill C-6 forward through Parliament. This is especially upsetting because the enormous influx of children in Canada now declaring themselves to be “transgender” or “gay” cries out for therapy that could be lifesaving for them, or at least save them from disfiguring surgery or medical procedures that would render them sterile. That bill is basically child abuse.
At the time the interview took place (July 16), Bill C-6 had easily passed the House of Commons and was headed to the Senate where it would also easily pass. Bill C-36 was about to be voted on in the House of Commons. However, on August 15, Prime Minister Justin Trudeau called for a federal election to take place on Sept. 20, 2021. This effectively killed all the bills currently in Parliament. However, both of these bills will surely be brought back in the next session, since they represent a major political goal of the LGBT movement in Canada.
The deterioration of rational government in Canada today - where the world may be headed
As MP Sloan describes, these bills represent the larger direction that the political establishment in Canada is taking the country. Even though most Canadians are privately not that extreme, they tend to go along with it because the special interests (such as the LGBT movement) have become extremely powerful and intimidating, and because people tend to just react rather than think things through. This situation is very dangerous for any society.
Is this where the US and other countries are headed? The terrible government oppression of people like Rob Hoogland and Bill Whatcott who have stood up to this lunatic movement, may be providing a glimpse of the future.
Please help us continue to do our uncompromising work!
Our successes depend on people like you.
Your support will make the difference!
Thursday, July 1, 2021
While the Corrupt CAGOP is Rigging an Endorsement – RINO Faulconer’s Corrupt Deal with Ash Street is Being Ripped Open
From the pen of Intrepid Blogger Aaron Park:
While the Corrupt CAGOP is Rigging an Endorsement – Faulconer’s Corrupt Deal with Ash Street is Being Ripped Open

I thought the Republican Party was the party of law and order? I guess the CAGOP is the party of consultants and paychecks. That is the only conclusion you could draw from the underhanded tactics that were exposed by your intrepid blogger and Stephen Frank. While the legislators closed ranks to re-elect the scandal-marred and corrupt puppet of the establishment Jessica Patterson, one of the expected payoffs of rigging the convention and the process was to be the Kevin Faulconer Payday. I can draw no other conclusion based on what I’ve seen and learned.
San Diego City Attorney Mara Elliott filed suit Tuesday to void the city’s lease-to-own agreements for both the 101 Ash Street and Civic Center Plaza properties. The action came hours after the Union-Tribune reported that real estate broker Jason Hughes was paid almost $10 million by a middleman company while advising former Mayor Kevin Faulconer on the two transactions.
Jason Hughes was purported to be a volunteer by Kevin Faulconer. Whoops.
Since 2016, the city has paid tens of millions of dollars to lease and renovate the former Sempra Energy building on Ash Street, which has been vacant for all but a few weeks since the Fortune 500 company moved out in 2015.
The building is full of asbestos and has other issues preventing the city from using it.
The Union-Tribune reported late Monday that Hughes, who advised the city on the deal, was paid $4.4 million for securing the Ash Street deal in early 2017 and just over $5 million for his work on a similar deal for the city’s lease of the nearby Civic Center Plaza in 2015.
The nearly $10 million collected by Hughes came from Cisterra Development, a San Diego company that acted as a middleman in both the Civic Center Plaza and Ash Street leases.
What a visual. The Democrats are going to (literally) burn Kevin Faulconer down with this. Meantime, the CAGOP is on a suicide mission to anoint this guy.
The City Council agreed to the 20-year lease-to-own arrangement in 2016 on Faulconer’s recommendation. The former mayor said the deal would save the city more than $40 million in future office space expenses.
But after Elliott signed off on the lease, city officials learned that the property could not be safely occupied.
The lease was $535,000 a month for a building loaded with Asbestos. The main consultant on the project raked in $10 Million and then there is this:
The $535,000 monthly lease payments that were to be paid over 20 years translate to the city spending approximately $128 million for the Ash Street building. Combined with operational costs, maintenance and renovations, the city committed some $200 million for the 19-story high rise.
The building appraised for $67 million before the council approved the deal at Faulconer’s recommendation. The year before, former majority owner Shapery sold 49 percent of the property to financier Douglas Manchester.
It’s not yet clear how the city’s amended complaint might affect the spate of lawsuits already pending over the Ash Street transaction — or whether or how either Ash Street or the Civic Center Plaza deals may be unwound.
The city could always renegotiate the deal for the Civic Center Plaza, which has housed the City Attorney’s Office and other city departments for years.
But the Ash Street building needs wholesale repairs, remediation and upgrades estimated by one consultant to cost $115 million.
Either Kevin Faulconer is a blithering idiot (see also incompetent) or he is completely corrupt. You can’t explain this scandal any other way and now you have a key cog in the deal who was on the take (allegedly) who is now named in the lawsuit by the city.
Now let’s say for a second that Faulconer was an innocent victim (aka just incompetent vs corrupt). Take a look at this from another article about the City’s Lawsuit against the players in the project:
In 2016, the city agreed to borrow just under $92 million to acquire the Ash Street high rise. Faulconer recommended the deal to the City Council even though the building had been appraised for $67 million.
Wait — the savior of the California Republican Party got the City of San Diego to pay $92 Million for a building worth $67 Million??? (That’s before the asbestos and the busted fire suppression system were discovered)
So, when Faulconer was mayor, he led the effort to get the City to Overpay for an Asbestos-Riddled Building with a broken Fire Suppression System. Then we find out one of the main players in the deal raked in a cool $9.4 Million from a middleman while attempting to avoid disclosure?
The Ash Street property has been uninhabitable for all but a few weeks since Sempra moved out in 2015 due to asbestos contamination, a broken fire-suppression system and other issues. A consultant hired by the city issued a report last year estimating that repairs would cost approximately $115 million.
Gavin Newsom has the best that the democrat party has to offer advising him and helping his campaign. I’d bet he is drooling over facing Kevin Faulconer…
… and Faulconer?
Pro-Choice
Anti-Family
Open Borders
Tax Raiser
Gun Grabber
Last I checked, we already had one of those in the Governor’s Office. #EPICFAIL
P.S. AS detailed on this blog, there are over 50 delegates to the CAGOP that we appointed in violation of the CAGOP’s By-Laws. If a candidate for the recall does not sue over this issue alone, they deserve to watch them rig the endorsement of Faulconer.






















