![]() |
| A more accurate logo for Maywood Academy High School |
![]() |
| A more accurate logo for Maywood Academy High School |
For
80s kids like me, the movies of the era stay with you, even define you. One
of the best is The Goonies. No film better encapsulates the courage and
camaraderie of a bunch of boys taking on a challenge and winning. One of my
favorite characters is Data, played by Chinese-American actor Ke Huy Quan. I enjoyed
his quirkiness, resourcefulness, and humor, which captured the character of the
movie.
I like Ke Huy Quan the actor, as well. This former child
star had disappeared from Hollywood for years. Then in 2023, he made an
incredible comeback in the multi-Academy Award-winning movie Everything
Everywhere All at Once. He hit it so big that he won multiple awards during
the 2023 season. More than a dream come true or a fantasy only in script
houses, Quan’s comeback is the perfect Hollywood story.
Sadly, many child actors’ careers die in a graveyard of missed
or misspent potential. They struggle in adulthood, having lost their money to
unscrupulous guardians, or they suffer abuse in the industry. Many of them never
renew their careers because Father Time has chased away their childhood charm. Ke
Huy Quan broke away from that sad pattern, bent the rules, resisted the
typecasting—and won big time. His unprecedented renaissance should inspire hope
in all of us, and we can relive the amazing ups and downs in his memoir Never
Say Die. This book is a must-read with a literary character that should
remain on readers’ minds and library shelves for years to come.
His book begins with a hazy memory: his family’s flight from
Vietnam during an increased crackdown on the Chinese community. This traumatic
escape sets up a major theme in his story: that from a young age, he felt like
an outsider trying to fit in. When he got into movies, he felt a sense of
belonging, and he stood out among his peers and his family.
We learn about the trials he faced sitting in a jail cell when
trying to flee Vietnam, and he endured this incarceration as a child! He walks
us through the pain, the turmoil, and the confusion he faced entering Hong Kong
as a refugee, then arriving in America. We celebrate his happier times as a
famous child actor, but we also respect his perseverance when acting roles
dried up, and he started working behind the camera to stay in Hollywood.
Quan’s parents feature prominently in the memoir, and
deservedly so. He praises their endurance, their work ethic, and their
commitment to giving their children the best life possible.
The subtle literary quality of Never Say Die stands
out as Ke develops other key themes (no pun intended) throughout the book. In
the first part of his memoir, he writes like a child, communicating with us
from a childlike point of view. As the story progresses, the author’s style
reflects his growth and awareness not just in what he shares, but in how he
retells his history to us.
During his first unpleasant stay in a Vietnamese jail, Ke
asks his father when they can go home. His father answers, “Soon.” As an actor
in the United States getting back into the craft, Ke wonders if he can make it.
His faithful, comforting, supportive wife of twenty years (whom Ke praises
throughout the book) comforts him: “Soon.” Reading the author’s success building
upon success, we connect how all of Quan’s challenges, frustrations, and
disappointments have prepared him for the latest incredible, joyful period in
his life.
Ke not only reveals his heart, mind, and soul, but he brings
us into the emotionally riveting life of someone in relative obscurity suddenly
vaulted into fame and fortune. You feel like you’re living this life with him!
Two of his encounters as a child actor stand out.
First, he became friends with world-renowned music superstar
Michael Jackson during his unexpected visit to The Goonies film lot. The
same world-famous Michael Jackson would call Ke at home and invite him to a private
screening of one of Quan’s movies. Ke writes that the invitation didn’t go to
his head, revealing his humble spirit even as an up-and-coming child star.
Ke also met Princess Di and Prince Charles during his press
tour for Indiana Jones and the Temple of Doom. I loved how he described
her in the book: “She felt normal. Kind, polite, genuine. I could see why
people loved her.”
Those words describe Ke Huy Quan as well.
Those two encounters stand out specifically because they
display how fame affects people in drastic ways. Jackson succumbed to physical
problems and drug addiction because of constant public pressure. At one point,
he lamented: “I am the loneliest person in the world.” Princess Di died from
the excess of fame she endured, as she crashed in a Paris tunnel attempting to
flee harassing paparazzi. Thankfully, through rise and fall and rising again to
fame, Ke Huy Quan didn't suffer such a terrible fate as Di or MJ. That’s good
news and a great story in itself. He didn’t suffer like other child actors after
losing their stardom. Part of this success was due to his strong, supportive family.
In fact, his mother stayed with him (and, incidentally, protected him) during
his childhood film career. Too often, child actors lose themselves or even get
harmed on film sets. (Watch
An Open Secret for more information).
In the second part of his memoir, Ke describes the new life
he would build for himself behind the camera, then chases his dream to return
to acting. He writes with a warm, budding invitational tone, showing us how all
the hard moments in his life fit together, putting him in the right place at
the right time—all at once! After a small role in 2021, he auditioned for EEAAO
at the producers’ request. Throughout the process, he exhibits a
characteristic humility and gratitude, but also a newly found calm acceptance
if he doesn’t get the role (which he is convinced is perfect for him, by the
way!)
Ke Huy Quan’s humility is the most engaging aspect, a man
you want to meet, whose stories you want to hear. He leads us intimately
through what it’s like to be famous, to endure a career slump, then to be
famous again, and to remember where you’ve come from.
Quan’s memoir ends with him speaking to the UNHRC Global
Refugee Forum in Geneva, Switzerland. There, he revisits his experience as a
refugee. Quan’s status as a refugee was both a distant memory and a source of
shame for him, an identity he had been trying to flee or suppress. At this
stage of his life, with a renewed career, all the pieces of his life, every
step of the journey, come together, the same way that seemingly disparate elements
in a timeless classic coalesce. After the event, he gets to connect with
something very personal, so profound that I don’t want to spoil it for you—you
need to read the book!
In his memoir Never Say Die, Ke Huy Quan, wunderkind
turned wonderful adult, relishes everything, everywhere, all at once, and we
enjoy the ride with him!
His
big speech at the Academy Awards captures it all perfectly:
“My journey started on a boat. I spent a year in a refugee
camp. And somehow, I ended up here, on Hollywood’s biggest stage. This is the
American dream!”
Congresswoman Maxine Waters is the only Congressional
representative in the South Bay section of Los Angeles County currently holding
in-person town halls.
Rep. Waters has no reason to hide, and she could ignore the
constituents, since she wins by 75% every cycle. Despite the fact that she
easily wins, she shows up for her district. This is the key to her lasting
power. She brings home the bacon, she makes all the right connections, she
stays in the good graces of local leaders, so she just keeps winning.
But are her constituents winning, too?
She’s been in Congress for thirty-five years, and the cities
in her district have gotten poorer, dirtier, more expensive, filled with
homeless people, and crime-ridden.
But she keeps getting elected, and she keeps holding her
town halls, but will anyone hold her accountable?
On October 3rd and October 10th, she held four town halls throughout
her district.
Three of them took place in local community colleges. One of
them was held in a high school. I attended the three at the colleges. Only one-third to half the
seats were filled. Where was everybody?
At every event, the President of the college introduced the
event with a Land
Acknowledgement. If they feel so guilty about “taking” land from the
Tongva/Gabrielino tribes that were running around in the region so many
centuries ago, then just go back to wherever you think you came from!
And this was only the first folly from the college
presidents.
In their curated introduction, they said that Congresswoman
Waters represented Lomita as well as Torrance. During the previous decade, her
district did include Torrance and Lomita. Not anymore. How could they be so
unprepared? Then they said her latest victory was in 2022. Didn’t she win the election
in 2024?
When the 88-year-old Congresswoman finally showed up, she
rolled out experts to talk about the issues everyone is concerned about:
·
Housing
·
Affordability
·
Healthcare
·
Election Integrity
·
Immigration
·
Iran
The most famous panelist was Dean Logan, the
Registrar-Recorder for Los Angeles County, and he spoke at every town hall on
election issues as a courtesy to the Congresswoman. She even bragged that she
had been harassing him on the phone about protecting the vote and stopping
Trump’s so-called voter intimidation tactics. Logan’ office is supposed to be
non-partisan, but he was tipping his hand for the Democrats to win big—most
likely because if he doesn’t pander to them, they can cut off his money.
All of the voter precautions he discussed hide the darker
reality that Democratic politicians want illegals and non-citizens to vote.
Corrupt governments depend on fixing the vote or stuffing the ballot box to
ensure their hold on power. Registrar Logan.
On housing, we heard empty talking points about building
more. Congresswoman Waters championed a bipartisan bill (The 21st Century ROAD
to Housing Act) that she worked on with Committee chair French Hill to create a
database of available public land as well as rolling back regulations on
building materials, a $ 200 million annual grant program to local communities that
loosen their zoning laws, and provides a cap on the number of homes that large
corporations can open. Repealing bad regulations is good, but bribing cities to
throw away their zoning laws is bad, and telling private corporations what they
can and cannot buy is just communism. Housing prices are still through the roof
in Southern California, despite Waters’ touting this legislation as a success.
The talking heads on affordability and healthcare complained
about President Trump’s One Big Beautiful Bill Act. They whined about the work
requirements for recipients to stay on Medicare. These bureaucrats and
lobbyists considered eighty hours a month too cruel for able-bodied adults to
maintain the government subsidy. (They should get off the dole and get back to
work!) They complained about the budget cuts; they complained about the
reforms; they complained about the mass firings of federal employees. To sum up, they complained that the government
train of easy money is coming to an end.
The immigration “experts” condemned ICE, accused them of
murder (not true), and they encouraged the audience to violate federal law by
frustrating the Trump administration’s lawful enforcement of federal
immigration laws. What is this?
The panel refused to acknowledge that mass immigration
(legal or illegal) means higher costs for everything. Because of the
immigration crackdowns, housing costs have actually started coming down in
major cities, freeing up the housing market. As expected, Congresswoman Waters’
talking heads wouldn’t discuss bad regulation, high crime, or other issues that
actually matter.
The more they complained, the happier I became. President
Trump is doing his job, and I am glad that he came back stronger since his
previous term.
Then came the question-and-answer periods.
This time around, Waters didn’t throw me out. She probably couldn’t
remember me from her January 2026 town hall in Gardena.
At El Camino College, one resident started getting rowdy, and he started yelling at
the panelists and the Congresswoman. She was not ready for those
disruptions. The man kept bellowing about how he was smarter than everyone else
on the stage. The president of the university escorted him out, and two law
enforcement officers appeared to keep the peace.
I
asked her about the Defund the Police movement in Los Angeles County, and
whether she thought it was OK for schools and teachers to keep secrets from
parents. In an unprecedented move, she openly differed with the Democratic
Socialists of America and made it clear that no city’s police departments were
getting defunded. Regarding parents' rights, she hid behind: “I just want
everyone to be happy, and I support LGBTQ.”
At the Inglewood town hall, a young woman took to the
floor and began yelling and screaming at Congresswoman Waters. Three men in the
audience crowded around her to stop her shouting, but she kept yelling. My
friend Keith Hardine took the video.
At the Compton town hall, I tried to get her take on
biological men invading women’s sports, spaces, and prisons. She refused to
defend the women, hid behind this weak argument that the government shouldn’t
tell people how to live their lives (as if!), and then declared that she
supports the LGBTQ.
At the Southwest College town hall, Louise Solomon of Marina Del
Rey yelled at the Congresswoman for violating her oath of office. The whole
room erupted, and the Congresswoman shut the meeting down early to avoid
further tough questions.
Her constituents have celebrated her for years for
delivering government funding for food, housing, and healthcare. How much
longer will they tolerate the inaction on all these issues as prices rise and
quality of life falls in their communities? This was the first time I had ever
seen residents yelling at her from the audience as well.
Is the DSA planning on taking her out in the next election?
Will she run in 2028, by which time she will be the oldest member of the House
of Representatives? Will her constituents have any patience with her lack of accomplishments?
The younger, more socialist generations are getting restless for change, and
the older black female Baby Boomers who make up her core support are dwindling
fast.
Last year, I told New
Yorkers to vote for Republican Guardian Angel (and perennial candidate) Curt
Sliwa, but prepare for the worst.
Democratic Socialist Mamdani was the favorite from May to
November 2025, with polling consistently giving him the edge. Former governor Andrew
Cuomo, forever corrupt and incompetent and glorying in self-aggrandizement, was
the last person who should have been mayor.
Democrats and Republicans who didn’t want a crazy commie
taking over their city glided toward Cuomo. Mamdani had the momentum, though;
he had the outsider star power (the fact that he never held down a real job
made that edge even easier), and he offered a bold set of ideas … at least to
anyone ignorant of history, which describes the vast majority of the educated
chattering classes in New York City Upper East or Lower West or anywhere else.
The communist won, and New Yorkers are getting what they
voted for. They wanted government grocery stores? They will get lines of people
waiting for bread, when across the country the bread waits in line for us. They
wanted potholes filled? Good luck keeping the police officers on the force, as
well. They wanted cheaper housing? They’re getting rent control, less housing,
higher prices, and a feeling that they are better than the suburbs.
New York City is on its last legs, and the voters deserve
what’s coming.
A silver lining shines out, though. Democrats to the left of
Hochul are failing in New York City. How about electing a governor to the
right? Blake ______ is gaining on the incumbent governor, and Democratic
celebrities are lining up behind a Republican to keep the Empire State from
turning into a rump failed state.
What about Los Angeles?
The same dynamic of left-wing getting its wings is flying on
the West Coast. Another deep blue city is looking at voting between bad and worse,
dumb and dumber, corrupt and more corrupt as their final choices for next mayor
of Los Angeles.
During the June primary, LA voters had a chance to elect
common sense, results, and accountability: Spencer Pratt. A victim of the
Palisades fires, which devoured multiple homes while Mayor Karen Bass was
celebrating the inauguration of the next president of Ghana, Pratt demanded a
city that would work for everyone. His campaign? Lock up the criminals, clean
up the streets, protect the businesses, and allow everyone to enjoy a better
quality of life.
Voters also had the choice of repeat failure,
politician-for-life incumbent Karen Bass, or Democratic Socialists of America (DSA)-aligned
city councilwoman Nithya Raman.
Raman had won her city council re-election outright in 2024,
despite residents and business owners complaining about the neglected,
dilapidated state of her district, which stretches from Silver Lake to Encino,
with Sherman Oaks and Studio City thrown in for good measure. A richer, higher
echelon of voters still voted for the least of all candidates. Homelessness has
gotten so bad, that residents staged their homeless sit-in protest outside of
her home!
How do you like it, Nithya? The
stunts, the anger, the despair spilling onto the City of Angeles might not
matter if the polling proves accurate, since all of them point to a Raman
victory over incumbent Bass come November.
The Democratic Socialists of America will have realized
their greatest feat yet: control over the two largest cities in the country.
From there, they can build on the big donor base in the two largest cities and
run one of their own for President and more US Senate seats.
Raman, an immigrant from India, educated at Harvard and MIT,
blessed with all the goodness that is America, has campaigned on grievance and
gain at the expense of those who work for their money or own their property. She
hates the West, the wise, the good, and the common-sensical. What Democratic
Party apparatchiks have promised for decades, she will deliver: voters for
non-citizens, single-payer healthcare, abolition of law enforcement, etc.
California Election Law does not permit a write-in at the
General election for mayor, so the voters are stuck between a rock and a prison.
Indie
journalist Daniel Guss urges LA voters to vote for both to spoil the county
and tally their outrage and opposition, but one of them will still win.
The winner is looking more and more like Raman.
And the voters of Los Angeles deserve everything that
happens to them.
Can’t they get their act together and vote for someone
worthwhile? Decent? Not evil?
Los Angeles hasn’t enjoyed a Republican mayor since
philanthropist Richard Riordan, who brought class and competence to city
government during his tenure. Despite his endorsement of President Bill Clinton
in 1996, Riordan did well by the city. Democratic successors demonstrated some
competence of their own, as well as controversy. With the rise of the DSA in
the last five years, and their en masse takeover of the Los Angeles County
Democratic Party, Los Angeles County and Los Angeles city have witnessed a
sharp veer to the political Left.
Land Acknowledgements, defunding of the police, LGBT
celebrations everywhere, ethnic months and non-profit pandering, reparations
boards, protests against Israel, and more attacks on churches and Jews
communities have erupted across every level of government in the wake of the
socialist spread.
And now the mayor’s race will broaden the bad.
Bass is desperate for support, touting endorsements of local
leaders in a recent spate of commercials. She expected a walk in the park as
the First Female (and First Black Female) mayor in the city’s history. She’s
getting walked and will likely get put out to pasture. Identity politics aren’t
getting her across the finish line this time. The LA-aera progressive left has
gone full commie, and they want their workers’ revolution NOW! They can out-organize
the establishment, overcoming the institutional inertia of the labor unions,
big business, and the many lobbyists who made Downtown Los Angeles their second
home.
Nithya Raman is the face of the rising socialist uprising,
and Los Angeles should get ready for the Bolshevik takeover.
The one silver lining in all of this: Karen Bass deserves to
go. She’s a political climber from state assembly to assembly speaker to
Congress, who had a shot at Joe Biden’s VP slot, and now LA mayor. To see her
political career crash and burn will be fun.
The one question that Raman needs to consider: Is she ready
for them when they turn on her, just as the DSA Left has taken Mamdani to task
for not moving fast enough to enact their demented agenda? Silly DSA
politicians, they never learn: the Revolution always eats its own, especially
its enthusiastic thought leaders who fail (because they can’t succeed) to live
up to and enact their utopian aspirations.
Finally, here’s my question to the Los Angeles electorate:
will four years of DSA madness at the helm of your angelic city awaken you from
your regressive leftist woke slumbers to vote for common sense? Perhaps you
will vote for Spencer Pratt in four years, perhaps even a Republican? Or are
you prepared for the fully demonic DSA possession of your city? Are you
prepared to pay for the political exorcism once the city breathes its last?
James Preston Allen writes, “Art in Democracy is essential.”
Yet he complains that the only art or culture that matters is
what makes money, as though that should not be the case.
He should remember what the great English poet Alexander Pope
(a Catholic who faced persecution in Protestant England, by the way) wrote
about the English language’s greatest writer, William Shakespeare:
"Shakespear, (whom you and ev'ry Play-house bill
Style the divine, the matchless, what you will)
For gain, not glory, wing'd his roving flight,
And grew Immortal in his own despight."
Shakespeare wrote “To be or not to be” for gain, not glory,
not goodwill, not to get a better king christened over the British Isles. He may
not have changed the politics of his country, but Shakespeare’s work still stuns,
moves, inspires, and influences our world.
Art has to sell. What can be more democratic than allowing
the people to choose, pay for what they want to see, hear, and ponder? Art doesn’t
sell, doesn’t impress, if the artist insists on shoving a message in our face,
advocating a position or a policy at the expense of revealing eternal values
and verities.
That matters of value, truth, worth: such concepts have
little interest for the Left. All they care about is power, and that’s why left-wing
activism under the guise of artistic expression fails to impress every time. Making
Art political has caused many artists to fail and has ruined the art scene for
the last thirty years.
I am an opera fan. When I was a kid, I fell in love with the
movie Amadeus, especially the opera scene from Don Giovanni. Opera
can take you from your humdrum world to true transcendence. In 7th grade, my
music teacher took the band (I played the clarinet) and other music students to
Gilbert and Sullivan's The Mikado.
It was very entertaining, even though some of the costumes
were cringe-worthy: The gentlemen's chorus wore karate outfits. The three
little girls from school wore women’s sailor suits. In eighth grade, we saw an
English version of The Barber of Seville. It was funny and eventful,
too.
Opera: It’s grand, it’s loud, it drives people crazy, it
invites laughter.
Opera: It invites scorn, it costs a lot of money, it’s a
rich part of a country’s history, it’s an essential part of the classical music
canon.
It’s also facing hard times. Opera has gotten postmodern,
weird, and too exclusive in trying to be inclusive.
The art form must be preserved and promoted. But how?
In the 1960s, everyday people would line up for a performance.
Maria Callas and Franco Corelli commanded respect on the stage and in the
press. Their voices were fresh and compelling. They were great actors as well
as singers.
Luciano Pavarotti was a household name (still is, based on
his ongoing social media presence) . You can listen to his incredible
interpretation of “Nessun dorma,” with the ecstatic “Vincerò!” at the end. From
1979 to his last performance at the Torino 2026 Winter Olympics, his craft would only improve,
touching your heart as well as mind and ears.
Opera has that kind of power. Rock stars can’t resonate
within a man the way an opera can. The grand stories, the tragedies and
comedies, the ongoing influence of opera in our popular culture (I still think
of Elmer Fudd chanting “Kill the Rabbit! Kill the Rabbit” in one of my favorite
Looney Tunes shows!)
And yet opera is facing unprecedented challenges, even at
war with itself, according to former opera singer and impresario (impresaria?)
Caitlin Vincent in her book Opera Wars, drawing on her experience as an
MA in Fine Arts, a retired opera singer, an opera director, and a librettist.
. She approaches the subject with an academic, historical,
and deconstructionist perspective, but it’s not off-putting. It’s a thorough
yet light excursion into a larger-than-life artistic subject which deserves
more attention—and care—than it’s getting.
In the first part of her book, she gets bogged down in
definitions. The real drama over opera isn’t how best to define it, but how
best to revive and refine it for the modern stage. I found her exploration of
different forms of opera interesting, but none of it solves the larger opera
problem.
Then she discusses the tension between composers and librettists,
directors and conductors, stage crew and performers. She gives the impression
that opera faces unique challenges connecting different—and disparate—artists
to mount a production. Ask movie producers what they go through, or even
theatre companies! The arts world faces unparalleled challenges getting their
craft off the ground.
Opera is no different. Yet the movie industry is taking back
ground in the culture. Books, even comic books, are still selling despite the
massive reach of the Internet and the online world.
Opera can make it, too, but it needs to engage in the right
operation!
Opera is special because of the music, which not only gives
life to words, but allows many stories to be told at the same time! In one of my favorite scenes from Amadeus, Mozart
explains
to the Emperor: “With lots of people talking at once, it’s just noise. But
with music, with music, you can have a perfect harmony!”
So, what are the problems plaguing opera today?
Vincent starts with “The Canon,” i.e., the accepted and
frequently played repertoire. Opera companies want reliable hits to keep the
audience coming—and the money flowing. Puccini, Verdi, and Mozart will always
draw box office. Bizet’s Carmen is a must-have for any opera company’s
repertoire. My favorite, French composer Jacques Offenbach’s final masterpiece Les
Contes d’Hoffmann has been a less frequent but reliable staple in opera
houses.
Opera companies need to make money or at least try to break
even. Experimental operas, new operas, or older operas not on the well-trodden
stage are risky at best, and most companies are operating on a shoestring
budget to get by. Opera in Los Angeles depends on government money!
Think about this, though: can you imagine the movie industry
surviving simply by reviving old movies? Some movie houses survive on replays,
but the industry won’t make it on sequels and replays alone. The same holds for
opera. They need new and approachable works, but opera companies are reluctant
to risk the house on experimental productions.
They should reconsider. Four Saints in Three Acts
(1934), Nixon
in China (1986), and Dead
Man Walking (2000) all count as modern opera, and they are all
very good.
What else is plaguing opera? Vincent shared that Canon
operas come with extensive staging directions. Purists want to see La
Traviata the way Verdi wanted it. New opera companies want to provide
updated plots, different scenes, or even minimalist productions.
Opera isn’t struggling for talent, though. She details the
struggles opera singers face, from learning they have “the Voice” (it’s never
theirs, by the way. Singers and coaches talk about the voice as if it’s a
separate instrument), to maintaining small victories in Young Artist Programs,
to finding steady work, and then the minute cadre of singers who become
superstars.
So, what’s opera’s problem?
Throughout her book, Vincent reveals a large reason why
Opera is struggling, yet without recognizing it. She is committed to
“representation and diversity,” and she casts aspersions on the larger role of
white males in the opera world. Opera companies have been increasingly bogged
down by DEI and critical theory initiatives. Vincent even writes that some of the
world's most celebrated operas come off as “problematic” to younger, college-saturated
audiences.
The major donors funding operas are increasingly woke, as
well. They have their ideas of how opera should look, sound, and work on a
stage – and the public isn’t buying.
This woke tinkering is bad enough, but modern thinking has
also changed the type of
singing that we hear on the stage. Here are two videos (click here and here) from opera
professionals lamenting ruinous modern techniques. In the fifties and sixties, opera
singers sounded fresh, lively, and engaging. Today, too many of them sound
pinched, whiny, and overtly technical. Compare these two tenors
as an example of the bel canto versus modern style. Tell me what you
think. (Modern doesn't sound good!)
If opera wants to take center stage in our culture again,
they need to embrace a rich past with an opportune future. Try new things while
catering to the wants of a general audience. More importantly, though, opera
performers and producers need to ditch the modern techniques and postmodern
ideas, the DEI box-checking, and the identity politics. Give us a good show
that will charm us and move us, opera people, and the people will come again!
In June 2026, former Newsweek and Time Magazine editor (and
one-time plagiarist),
now current CNN host Fareed Zakaria made a stunning admission about the Golden
State: “How
California became a study in failed governance.” To his credit, Zakaria has
not been afraid to discuss issues which the Left hides and the Democratic Party
runs from, like the strong connection between
Muslims majorities and rising terrorism.
On October 2nd, 2026, CNN’s Elex Michelson interviewed
his colleague about this article, whose subject was timely with the current
election season in California.
Yes, Zakaria has argued the obvious. If you want to see what
failure in the face of opportunity and plenty looks like, look at California.
The more compelling aspect of his admission is that a liberal pundit in the
national media is willing to state the obvious. We all agree: California is
dysfunction writ large. There is more to the story, but at least Fareed states
what his colleagues won’t acknowledge.
To his detriment, however, Zakaria outlines a bunch of
solutions that miss the mark and cover up the real reasons for California’s
precipitous and public decline.
At the outset of his interview, he claims that California projects
and programs have come to a standstill and can accomplish nothing because of
“vetocracy” throughout the state government, i.e., some apparatus or
decision-maker or rule frustrates any effort for reform, growth, or change. For
this term, he properly credited social scientist (and Trump-hater) Francis
Fukuyama.
Explaining his argument, Zakaria points out that the bullet
train approved by California voters in 2008 would have been built by now, but
for the constant environmental challenges. Homelessness could have been solved if
local leaders had cooperated with the state and left-wing homeless advocates
wouldn’t block enforcement measures with endless lawsuits. Reforms to improve
public safety, road repairs, and education could all take place if there wasn’t
the relentless interest-group hustle that stopped everything.
On the surface, this “vetocracy” argument makes little sense.
The California Democratic Party hegemon running the state legislation has held
veto-proof supermajorities since 2016. Republican opposition can only show up,
speak up, and vote “No!” on the worst stuff (sometimes, they vote with the rest
of the supermajority on bad stuff!), then cash their checks and campaign for
another two years to do the same rigmarole over and over. The Democrats have
carte blanche power to do whatever they want. They could pass laws to
streamline the bureaucracy, expedite change, enact better reforms, and fire the
executives responsible for accomplishing those tasks.
But they don’t.
Zakaria’s larger theme that California Democratic leaders
want to do the right thing, but can’t, is completely out of touch with reality.
As a lifelong California resident, I have no idea what Zakaria is talking about,
and why should he? He resides on the Upper West Side of Manhattan, another
bubble of the uber-rich and well-connected, a well of Deep Blue political
arrogance detached from the concerns and consequences of Democratic policy. He loves California, but how many times has he
visited? Has he ever lived there?
Regardless of California’s constant struggle, endless delays
and frustrations to get anything done, the problem isn’t that everyone wants to
work together but fails because of the bureaucracy. The supermajority
Democratic powers that be love the red tape, the litigation, the delays, the
incompetence, the virtue-signaling without virtue. They play into the will and
wishes of their major donors: labor unions, left-wing interest groups, and the
endless brigade of bureaucrats who consistently vote Democrat.
Performative politics among California leaders is the rule,
not the exception. Picture lame-duck (and long-shot no-chance Presidential
aspirant) Governor Gavin Newsom posing for well-timed photos in front of big
media journalists (in reality, propagandists) while picking up some trash along
the 405 freeway. Thanks, Gav, you picked up some garbage. How about enforcing
the vagrancy laws on state property so that illegal homeless encampments don’t
pollute our roads? Some twisted statistics, empty comparisons, and some jabs at
President Trump dominate Democratic pols attempting to make a difference.
There are other problems with Zakaria’s take on California’s
failed politics, or rather politics of failure, including his fawning treatment
of liberal voters. Zakaria claimed that somewhat educated people vote for
Democrats. They can’t be educated in any meaningful fashion if they are voting
against their own interests. Failed public safety measures (including lack of
coordination among departments) led to the Pacific Palisades inferno. The other
issues (homelessness, year-round wildfires, rising crime) grow worse year by
year, yet those educated keep voting for the same politicians who never fix the
problem. That’s insanity.
When Michaelson asked why the voters keep voting for the
same failed party leadership, Zakaria dodged their bad thinking and smeared
Republicans, particularly President Trump. He faulted their lack of “openness”
to diversity, immigration, and trade. He claimed that Republicans are “not
friendly to market economics.” What does he think of Democrats, then?
Zakaria won’t accept that the Democrats own the failures,
and Trump’s ascendancy in the Republican Party does not absolve them. Towards
the end of his interview, Zakaria actually claimed that the Democratic Party’s
heart is in the right place. Are you kidding me? If they have a heart, it’s
dedicated to the rich getting richer off government cronyism and cash (how do
“public servants” like Nancy Pelosi and Gavin Newsom get so rich having served
most of their adult lives in government?), pandering to diabolical identity
politics (LGBT celebrations, transgender sanctuary state laws, reparations for
African Americans in a state which entered the union as a Free State), and non-stop
Trump bashing. That’s former AG and current gubernatorial candidate Xavier
Becerra’s favorite sport, by the way, but at least his Republican opponent
ridiculed him for such weak answers in the face of California’s growing
problems.
Adding insult to his failed policy prescription, Zakaria
praised recently-elected San Francisco mayor Dan Lurie as a “cry for help” from
the voters in The City fed up with the broad array of failures. Crime
rates have dropped, homelessness
has decreased, and a more
moderate, pro-Lurie board of supervisors has taken power. However, the open-air
drug markets persist, major conferences
are not returning, and small businesses
have not bounced back. Lurie is moderate compared to the Democratic
Socialists of America, but simply dialing down the dysfunction should not be
the best standard for better governance.
Worst of all, Zakaria actually praised DSA New York City
mayor Zohran Mamdani. The former CNN contributor can identify all the problems
with California he can find, but to suggest that a vile, communist,
anti-Semitic perennial college student turned big-city mayor is focused on
basic issues is preposterous: the rise in hate crimes, onerous
tax policies, government-run
grocery stores, failed
rent-control policies, and hands-off
approaches to the police department all reveal a boy mayor trying to fill
shoes he cannot fit.
Democratic powerbrokers from Sacramento to San Diego follow
the Mamdani model, generating failure and incompetence due to their
“progressive” vision, all while ignoring reality, diminishing losses, and hiding
the truth about the plagued state, but at least they feel good about themselves.
Their vision is right, reality be damned.
When a political class celebrates such failure as success,
why would they change it?
(Response to Rest in Peace, Kevin Whitt: Detransitioner, Pro-Family Activist, and Friend)
Thank you for your kind words.
He suffered emotional, physical, and sexual abuse many times
as a kid. His peers mocked and teased him in grade school because of his
effeminate ways. In middle school, he came out as gay. He transitioned to female at 17, then joined
his other queer friends and joined the gay and trans club scene. He dressed up and played a drag queen. Relying
on internet ads, he engaged in prostitution with celebrities in sports,
entertainment, and the government. He lived the LGBT lifestyle out and proud.
Then one day, a dancer at a gay bar invited him to a church
in Florida. He started going to church regularly, even while still in the
lifestyle. He found Jesus, or rather Jesus found him. Then he got saved,
transitioning from death to life; he then transitioned from homosexuality to
health, from transgenderism to truth. He faced the demons that had robbed him
of his childhood and marred his adulthood. Then he got busy fighting the
destruction of children and the horrific lies of the LGBT cult.
His name was Kevin Whitt. He was my friend and fellow
warrior in the crusade against the LGBT agenda. I had a chance to speak with
him a week and a half ago, while he was struggling through major complications
following an experimental yet consistently successful surgery. He had been born
with a congenital heart defect, and the latest surgery was supposed to help him
breathe better, move better, and thus live better.
Then complications emerged, and he ended up succumbing to an
infection.
This is a difficult stage of life for many my age. I am
witnessing more friends and allies passing away. Neither school nor job
training can prepare you for these difficult times.
Kevin Whitt was a flamboyant personality, a hardcore
conservative not afraid to shout out the truth, call out the lies, and confront
the evil where it emerged. He marched and ministered with the Changed Movement,
a growing community of men and women who have left the LGBT lifestyle and
minister to others while telling the truth about homosexuality and transgender.
He spoke out against bans on so-called conversion therapy. He helped shut down
Drag Queen Story Hour programs throughout his adopted state of Texas (He was
born in Benton, Arkansas). His biggest interest was to protect children, not
just to end the medical and surgical mutilation of children, but to end the
social transitioning as well, i.e., the practice of confused or wretched
parents dressing up their boys as little girls and vice versa. Such confusion
is just as abusive, twisting and tormenting the mind of an already confused
child who needs truth, not enabling.
Kevin Whitt was the best witness for convincing politicians
and political groups to take a stand against this agenda. He had endured that
lifestyle, and he lived reborn to tell the story. He withstood hate from both
sides of the aisle, not just because he decided to turn away from the gay
lifestyle and expose its decadence and destruction. Republican circles
dismissed him or diminished him because he was outspoken, refusing to be
silenced by the Republican political establishment.
To this day, many pro-family conservatives don't want to
have these discussions. They fear being labeled a bigot, hater, homophobe, transphobe,
take your pick. It's that fear which has allowed the rampant harm to children and
society to proliferate.
Kevin refused to be quiet.
One of his closest confidants (and a friend of mine) was a
fellow pro-family activist, Tracy Shannon. For five years, she served as the
Texas director for international pro-family group MassResistance. She and Kevin
waged war against a repressive, destructive, tyrannical agenda that was
targeting her home state of Texas. Starting in 2021, Tracy and her team fought to
end the sex mutilation of minors, to codify a clear definition of sex as a
biological fact in the Texas code, and to repeal recognition of same-sex
marriage based on the corrupted Supreme Court opinion in Obergefell v.
Hodges.
Kevin had a lot of connections, more than I had ever
imagined.
He was there every step of the way with Tracy and
MassResistance. He
testified about his own trials as a child before numerous legislative
committees, and he rigorously demanded that lawmakers put the needs of
children and the well-being of society first. Despite the attacks from the
press, including the smears that he was a conspiracy theorist or a bigot, he
soldiered on to do what was right.
During the 2020 election, Kevin was featured in two Michigan
campaign ads (click here
and here to see) to
stop Democratic Presidential candidate Joe Biden and Democratic US Senator Gary
Peters from winning—both supported sex mutilation of minors and allowing
biological boys to invade girls’ sports. He was also featured in the Super Bowl
ad “He Saves Us,”
which served as a necessary and welcome response to the progressive ad series “He Gets Us.”
In October 2021, he
started a nonprofit, the Whitt Project, and he invited me to attend his
inaugural fundraising event. I didn't even have to pay anything because I had
been an energetic activist with him. I got to meet Congressman Louie Gohmert
and U.S. Senator Ted Cruz's pastor father, Rafael Cruz. It was an incredible
event, listening to this once-damaged boy become a fiery activist determined to
protect as many as possible from suffering what he went through. Kevin
was definitely a people person, and that care for people drove him to fight for
everything right in this world.
His death is the first in recent memory in which I had the
opportunity to say goodbye just before it was too late. Tracy and Kevin were
planning many events after his surgery, convinced that he would tough out the
complications and survive. They took no precautions, though, and friends
and family visited him in the hospital before he left us.
His legacy will not be lost to this world, though. A year
before his death, he completed a memoir about his life, trials, and
restoration in Christ: God Saved the Queen. Production and
distribution are pending, but I know it will be a great read.
I am sad to see him gone, but I know he’s in a better place,
and he left this world a better place, too.
October 22, 1978 -- September 25, 2026
I can't believe this.
It's been six years, and hospitals are still pushing the vaccine.
Unbelievable!
![]() |
Dear Arthur, You are eligible to receive an updated COVID-19 vaccine at no cost. If you are 65 or older, with a weakened immune system, or with other certain health conditions, you are at higher risk for serious illness from COVID-19. The good news is that updated COVID-19 vaccines are available, are safe, and are designed to give you stronger protection against severe illness, hospitalization, and death. Getting vaccinated can help protect your health, keep you out of the hospital, and allow you to safely enjoy time with family and friends. For more information, please visit: COVID-19 Vaccine Information | Kaiser Permanente. Sincerely, Kaiser Permanente
| ||
Thank you for choosing Kaiser Permanente as your partner in health. |
Corporate media and its commentators (The Economist, Paul
Krugman, Center
for Strategic and International Studies) are pushing a disturbing narrative
that the Chinese are winning the economic and cultural war against the United
States.
In fact, Trump proved the exact opposite to the world. His
epic reception of the Chinese president on September 23–25, 2026, was the
ultimate troll. The 47th President mocked the 46th
President, who had played the perfect puppet for Chinese interests at the
expense of America. If nothing else, Xi Jinping should have taken the hint that
his attempt to turn the United States against itself with corrupted leaders
failed. Trump also scheduled a B-2 Spirit bomber and four F-22 Raptors to fly
over their red-carpet reception, allowing Trump to flex our nation’s military
muscle before the leader of our main international rival. Most importantly,
China walked away from the latest summit with the President with no major
concessions from Trump to ease China’s growing economic challenges.
However, if Trump’s diplomacy doesn’t convince the public
that China is facing serious domestic problems, consider the disturbing trend spreading
among Chinese youth, which should provide the truth the West needs to know
about China’s future.
Since 2021,
Chinese Gen Z and younger are facing burnout like never before and responding
with a growing disengagement from the relentless rat race. They face daunting college
entrance challenges, fewer opportunities for studying in the United States
(thank you, President Trump, for putting American students first!), and a
foreboding career market, with little chance of upward mobility.
This generation of youth has labeled their movement Tang
Ping, or “Lying Flat,” in which they are engaging in a non-Confucian,
passive-aggressive rebellion against Chinese leaders, parents, and employers.
They see corporate demands yielding diminishing returns, and employment options
are not good. Instead of fighting for a better life, which is further out of
reach, they have opted for the following:
·
They have given up the broader “Chinese Dream”
of owning a car, property, a home, or even raising a family.
·
They have given up on “going big,” rejecting what
they deem empty consumerism.
·
They don’t care about larger professional or
corporate goals, opting to opt out of life in general. It’s “quiet quitting,”
but with a Chinese twist.
·
They do the bare minimum so that they can just
get by, since they are convinced there’s little hope of attaining anything
better.
The Chinese Communist Party is doing what it can to reverse this
trend, since the government craves a striving workforce culture to rival the
United States' ongoing hegemony in the world. The government has resorted to
deleting social media posts, including anything with the hashtag relating to Tang
Ping. The government has cracked down on the notorious ‘996’ (9 am to 9 pm,
six days a week) work culture. Large employers have implemented mandatory
clock-off times and shorter workweeks, too. Last of all, the Communist
government has labeled the whole push to urge young people to do as little as
possible as a Western conspiracy to frustrate Chinese productivity and national
success.
Yet all the prodding cannot make a Chinese ox drink, and they
cannot force Chinese youth to drink the Communist Party Boba-Tea of “Work Hard,
Get Ahead, Have Babies, and Make China Proud” when there’s little chance that
they can achieve any of this.
Even younger generations in China are succumbing to similar
Lying Flat middle-life crisis levels of disengagement. In one of the most
heart-breaking videos recently
posted on social media, a third-grade schoolboy from Tianjin (a major port
city in northeastern China) broke down in tears, slaving over a homework
assignment, while his mother filmed the entire nervous breakdown for the world
to see. He wasn’t crying because the assignment was difficult. He was wailing
because of a growing certainty that all his hard work would amount to nothing. He
was convinced that instead of wealth, success, and independence, he would turn
into another wage slave, or worse, end up in manual labor just to get by later
in life.
What’s particularly striking about this exchange is that
this little boy is openly challenging his mother, arguing with her,
contradicting her, and talking over her despite her best attempts to calm him
and redirect his attention to his studies. No matter how modern societies have
become, traditional Chinese Confucian culture places considerable emphasis on
filial respect and obedience to parents. Shockingly, this child dismissed submitting
to those norms, revealing desperation and exhaustion.
Another concern: why would a parent want to record her child
having such a horrible mental breakdown? At least she could have blurred out
her son’s face. Perhaps she was trying to alert the public to the increasing
stress and strain that Chinese children are facing?
What should the mother have done? She should have told him
to stop working right away instead of recording his emotional outburst, given
him a big hug, and then told him: “Yes, times are tough, but everything will be
OK.” If none of her assurances would have helped the boy, the mother should
have allowed him to be angry and let him release his emotions. Clearly, the
child was losing control of himself.
Major Asian news sites, including Gutzy
Asian, The Online
Citizen, and Singapore-based
Mothership, commented on this sad scene, with some of the articles making
light of this boy’s meltdown. Perhaps Chinese government officials watched this
video, or at least they should, since this suggests that their efforts to turn
back the “Lying Flat” movement are failing.
Despite all the Chinese Communist Party’s pretenses, the nation’s
younger generations are not doing as well as President Xi Jinping would like us
to think. Rapacious business policies, unsound protectionism, and aggressive
anti-American chauvinism are taking their toll on Chinese youth, forcing them
into harsher competition for higher education and jobs which aren’t as
plentiful as before. A large cohort of unemployed and underemployed, educated
Chinese are simply dropping out in the face of increased surveillance state
pressures, economic decline, and cultural malaise.
China is in trouble, and President Trump’s ongoing trade war
and pressure tactics are taking advantage of these weak spots. There is no
better proof of China’s ongoing problems than a Chinese boy breaking down over
the stress and strain of school and career. Could that cry, multiplied by
millions of other young Chinese, turn into a collective shout and national
protest against the regime’s authoritarian measures? Who knows, but Chinese
youths’ “Lying Down” movement shows no sign of stopping; rather, it exposes
China’s ongoing national—and international—weakness in the face of President
Trump’s continued MAGA policies.