Minnesota GOP Launches Recall Efforts Against No-Show Minnesota Democrats

Is there hope for the Republican Party of Minnesota?

They currently have a slim one-seat majority, and yet the Democratic Party is refusing to show up to work.

They want to wait until a special election is held to fill in a tie-breaking seat, which will force the House into a power-sharing agreement instead of allowing a Republican majority.

The Democratic Party across the country is doubling down on dumb rather than making an effort to win back voters they have lost over the last two election cycles.

Let's see if a GOP resurgence is on the horizon in Minnesota, as well (and perhaps a Republican will win the Electoral Votes in 2028?)

Friends, For nearly three weeks, House Democrats have refused to show up for work—while taking nearly $10,000 a day in taxpayer money. They are holding the state hostage, ignoring their duty, and failing the people of Minnesota. Enough is enough. It’s time to hold them accountable. That’s why we are launching a new website MinnesotaRecall.com —a statewide movement to recall every legislator who refuses to do their job. Join us in this fight.Donate today to power this recall effort. CHIP IN TO RECALL NO SHOW DEMOCRATS! Why This Matters Minnesotans go to work every day—if they don’t show up, they don’t get paid. House Democrats are pocketing taxpayer money while refusing to do their jobs. They are collecting nearly $10,000 a day—without showing up. They think they’re untouchable. We’re here to prove them wrong. This Is Totally Un-Minnesotan. It’s Egregious. It’s Irresponsible. Minnesotans expect accountability, common sense, and leadership—not corruption, dysfunction, and excuses. The Democrats’ failed leadership must end. This recall effort is our chance to take back Minnesota and restore integrity in government. We need your help. Stand with us. Donate now. HOLD THE DEMOCRATS ACCOUNTABLE - CHIP IN TO RECALL NO SHOW DEMOCRATS! For more information, visit MinnesotaRecall.com Together, we will hold these legislators accountable and bring real leadership back to Minnesota. Let’s get to work. Thank you for standing with us. In service, Alex Plechash, Chairman The Republican Party of Minnesota P.S.  Time is of the essence. The Democrats think they can collect their taxpayer-funded paychecks and hide from accountability. Let’s show them that Minnesotans demand better. Donate today to help fund the recall effort and send a message loud and clear. You Can Help by donating to help us hold the Governor Walz and the DFL accountable and protect our election laws. Click here to help. Hold Governor Walz and the DFL Accountable - Click Here to Help

Republican Party of Minnesota (651) 222-0022 | 7400 METRO BLVD STE 424 | EDINA, MN 55439 US

“Christ is King” is Not Enough

 

Kings made a comeback last year, when Queen Elizabeth passed away, after serving as the longest reigning monarch of the United Kingdom. Bonny Prince Charlie became King Charles III, putting aside the randy (and bloody) reputations of the previous Charles.

“Christ is King” has become a political rally cry, as well, especially among the populist, nationalist, traditionalist set taking over the GOP. I understand the desire for a restoration of our nation’s Judeo-Christian heritage. The revivals breaking out in Kentucky and Tennessee attest to this nation’s hunger for moral order and meaning.

Yet I must submit to this the Body of Christ in America, and to the political operatives seeking to make a difference in our governance: “Christ is King” is not enough.

It’s a great slogan, but Jesus, when He came to this earth in an earthen vessel, did not come to lord his kingship over us. First of all, He didn’t have to. As we sing “Silent Night” every Christmas, Jesus was “Lord at His birth.”

If we really want to honor Jesus, if we want to honor our Lord as Lord, we need to see him as Savior.

“America First” is a nice hobby, and it makes people feel good. But how do you define America, if there is no restoration of our Anglo-American legal tradition, or more importantly our Judeo-Christian heritage, which culminates in the profession of the Gospel?

More Winning: Hate Parody Tweet Lists Me with MTG, Lauren Boebert, and Charlie Kirk

Hate Twitter feed targets me.
As if!

Can you say "WINNING"?

I am so honored that there are hatemongers out there whose head I live in RENT FREE!

While so many people complain that the rent is too damn high, I can say freely that there is plenty of free rent for me to enjoy.

I live in so many leftists heads RENT FREE!

Check out this latest tweet attempting to shame and defame me:

Our friend @RandyVoepel musta radicalized his grandson. 👏🏻👏🏻👏🏻

Plus the inspiration from homophobes like me, Pastor Joe, @RepMTG, @RepBoebert Arthur Schaper & @CharlieKirk11 https://t.co/2GJf1LGi81 pic.twitter.com/cfENHanApQ

— MicheIIe Steel. CA. GOP. ᵖᵃʳᵒᵈʸ (@MicheIIeSteelCA) November 20, 2022

Regardless of whatever backstory prompted this tweet, I am so glad that people are noticing that I am taking a stand against the LGBT agenda and all of its hateful, militant adherents.

And it's a high honor to listed with Congresswomen Lauren Boebert and Marjorie Taylor Greene!

CRA Drama: Torrance Lomita Palos Verdes RA v. San Pedro "Palos Verdes" RA?

I received this letter from the head of the Torrance-Lomita-PV Republican assembly. [See Bold Type below]

Apparently, there has been some growing drama among the different chapters in the South Bay section of Los Angeles County.

The statewide organization is allowing another chapter to open up for Palos Verdes and San Pedro, here in the South Bay. The problem, though, is that another chapter, the Torrance-Lomita-Palos Verdes Republican Assembly, worked very hard to add Palos Verdes to its jurisdiction. The bigger problem is that the state leadership is allowing this new chapter to emerge, even though the outcome will run rough-shod over state and local by-laws.

What I am starting to see from the CRA is the same kind of raw pursuit for more clubs, for more leaders, but no real commitment to winning elections or building a conservative brand to take back the state. The state organization is also not responsive to local groups, which want more flexibility when it comes to members joining the club.

Another question does arise: are the local chapters getting their money's worth for all the donations that they have to send to the state organization? Members pay $25 a member, and $10-15 of that goes to the state organization. But for what? What is it accomplishing?

If the statewide organization is not going to play by the rules, why be a member? If the state organization is not going much for local chapters and candidates, what's the point?

Here's the letter from TLPVRA President Scott Carter regarding the potential take-over of the Palos Verdes area to another assembly unity. Tell me what you think:

Dear Torrance Lomita Palos Verdes RA Members, 

As a TLPVRA member, it is important for you to know what's going on and as your President it is important for me and our current Clubs goals to give you our information:

Currently our CRA President Johnnie Morgan, will be seeking members from our Torrance Lomita Palos Verdes Republican Assembly to be a member of the as-yet-to-be Approved "PalosVerdes San Pedro" CRA Unit.

Anyone may wish to be a member of that unit anywhere in California.

But here is the information for you to decide on:

Currently, their purpose is to just get members under the leadership of someone else and form a 'new club'.

The potential new president had resigned from our TLPVRA group when he was told he had a conflict of interest when he re-started another  club.

And at the same time, he secured the same speaker slated to speak to the South Bay Republican CRA unit, before they were to meet, for 'his' other group, which was not respectful to them and in my humble opinion, unethical.

Now, undeterred by his previous conflict of interest behavior, he has been asked by CRA President Johnnie Morgan, VP Davina Keiser, SD (outside of her Senate District) Jo Reitkopf, to start a new Unit in Palos Verdes. This is despite the fact we are the only ones legitimately assigned to Palos Verdes in 2020. The fact they did not consult us on it, which says volumes as to the character of the leadership of the CRA.

Aside from that, you are free to choose if you would like to be a member
of their PVSP Unit should you decide to.
We will continue to have our Endorsements for Palos Verdes School Board and City Councils in the next meeting as well, since we have the sole jurisdiction in that area.

If you do join the Palos Verdes San Pedro Club, it is not approved
for existence yet or for CRA Endorsement of Candidates. Only the Torrance
Lomita Palos Verdes Republican Assembly is eligible and capable to
do so.

However the "Palos Verdes San Pedro Club" is meeting in TORRANCE
(outside of their 'Territory', which is against the CRA Bylaws(Sec.10) in order
to establish themselves as a CRA Unit. That is a violation.)
(But it has been violated before without repercussions by the leadership of the CRA.)
To be held at Mimi's Restaurant and you are expected to pay (our meetings are free)
for a meal ($15-20 minimum) to listen to Mr Shawn Steele (Spoke at our Group in January) and State Treasurer Candidate Jack Guerrero ( a dynamic speaker, but had schedule conflicts with us on two occasions).

If you do decide to attend the meeting they may ask you to switch membership from our Club to their Club. It is up to you.

BUT WE would really like you to stay with us to continue building our Club and continue to pursue our area wide goals for Torrance, Palos Verdes and Lomita.

Our newsletter will be coming out soon for our new meeting location,

we are going back to the Torrance Airport Sunday Oct 16th, 2022, with plenty of parking,
NEW Time- 4:30pm to 6:30pm

Hope to see you at our New Meeting Location on October 16th.

Thank you for being a member of the Torrance Lomita Palos Verdes Republican Assembly.

Sincerely,

Scott Carter

President

Torrance Lomita Palos Verdes 
Republican Assembly,
CRA Senate Director District 24

Election 2022, NY-17: Reject LGBT RINO Mark Lawler, Vote for William Faulkner

Say NO to Mike Lawler for Congress

Congressional Candidate Mike Lawler: TALK Right, WALK Left

Aug. 22, '22

Is N.Y. Assemblyman Mike Lawler spouting Humor or Abomination? To precisely WHICH "PROVEN CONSERVATIVE RECORD" does he pompously refer in this self-adulatory ode?

"

"... Here is the truth: My opponents are attacking me because they can’t compete with my proven conservative record, ..."

Does Lawler mean THIS "proven conservative record"?

° 1) S6501 [A9648]: LGBT Task Force, just as NYS seeks to incrementally control religious schools;

° 2) A1880A [S2534]: LGBT indoctrination for Home-Health Aides;

° 3) A3355 [S1351]: de-enforcement of anti-prostitution statute, thereby escalating threats to human-trafficking victims, including minors;

° 4) A6593: LGBT & criminal Housing privileges;

° 5) S0774B/ A2632-A:  collection of transgender demographic statistics;

° 6) A5913A/ S0123-A: Establishes a statewide propaganda campaign for the "acceptance, inclusion, tolerance and understanding of diversity," read: alienation of adherents of Torah values {03/30/2022}

° 7) S4402: Transgender drivers license bill
~~

Additional examples of  Lawler jumping onto the BGTLQ legislative bandwagon:

° A2004/ S3070: To help ensure "diversity in recruitment and hiring in the public sector," meaning, among other things, the increased hiring of flagrant homosexualists and persons parading as the opposite sex, in the Public Sector (as if the Public Sector suffers from a deficit of Sexual-Identitarians); 05/19/2021.

° A5278: LGBT military discharge benefits; (exploiting patriotic sentiments to undermine the very values previous generations of heroes died to safeguard);

° A2230A/ S0070-A: "hate-crimes" data collection bill, (promoting LGBT dogma by exploiting violence against various groups;)

°  A2206/ S0623 [2021]: promoting LGBT by exploiting an anti-Cyberbullying bill;
###

In addition to his rich resume of BGTLQ-advocacy, "Pro-life" freshman Assemblyman Mike Lawler also voted for this pro-abortion bill: S0399A/ A0616-A: [Floor Votes: 06/11/2021]

SPONSOR: BIAGGI
/ COSPNSR: HOYLMAN, JACKSON, MYRIE, SALAZAR

Excerpt:

  "  24    4. Upon admitting a woman known to be pregnant, or  upon  learning  of pregnancy status, the chief medical officer of each correctional facili-ty  housing female inmates, including the medical professional responsi-ble for each local correctional facility housing female inmates, or such officer or professional's designee, shall immediately inform such  woman  of  the option of participating in pregnancy counseling services and the  right to abortion services.  ..."
~~~

As observed previously, if an expectant woman is in prison, and being "counseled" about the downside of NOT having an abortion, doesn't that seem quite close to cajoling her into aborting? ... "Choice."

~~~~~

Bottom Line:

If Lawler has a solid record, it's a record of faking Right and voting Left - on foundational morality and decency. There's nothing meaningfully "conservative" about empowering the transgender Mafia to advance their predatory agenda, all the more so in the midst of a national transgender crime wave against women and children. Nothing.

We thus strongly recommend voting for William Faulkner in BOTH the Republican and Conservative primaries. 

PS: "Right to Life Party is endorsing William Faulkner for Congress in the 17th Congressional district over Lawler, based on our two telephone interviews TODAY (Friday Aug.19th)." 

~~~

Please alert as many registered Republicans and Conservative Party members as possible.

Roe v. Wade Will Not Harm GOP Chances in 2022 (and Beyond)

 

Well, this is good news:

Roe v. Wade is fading from the news cycle with no political effect, the 1/6 hearings have been disgracefully discredited, Joe Biden’s approval rating is approaching the 20s, and WE ARE WINNING. pic.twitter.com/4ZPs0JgnBc

— Realignment Politics (@politicsrea) July 3, 2022

The overturning of Roe v. Wade is not going to wipe out the GOP ticket this year.

People are so angry about the blunt, in-your-face bread-and-butter issues crushing their wallets right now. People are fed up with the rising crime, the open borders, the government overreach tied to COVID-19.

AND, there is a growing consensus in this country that accepts limits on abortion. Dobbs v. Jackson does not criminalize abortion across the fifty states. The ruling does restore the power of the several states to restrict abortion as they see fit.

And many states (and more importantly, their voters) have seen fit to abolish the horrific practice.

Good for them, I say!

For decades, conservative pundits and prognosticators worried that if the Supreme Court finally removed Roe, the outcome would galvanize Democrats like never before to push all kinds of radical laws throughout the country. Worse yet, in whatever year that Roe went down, Democrats would swarm local and state elections, giving consummate power to Democratic party bosses.

The horror! The horror!

And yet, it looks as though that is not going to happen. In fact, the general ballot shows the GOP turnout increasing! Recall that in 2010, Democrats enjoyed a +3 generic ballot advantage, and they lost a net 60 house seats.

If the general ballot now has Republicans polling ahead, and at +5 (or even +10), that means we are looking at a massive GOP global flood!

And the repeal of Roe v. Wade is assisting this effort.

Lesson to the GOP Establishment: fulfill your promises, do your job, and you can win.

Trump capitalized on this basic idea, and he won a lot of victories while seated in the White House, and he is still winning today.

Travis Allen Opposes Prop 14 NOW -- Steve Frank Opposed Prop 14 from DAY ONE

Update and clarification for CAGOP Race:

Indeed, Travis Allen announced his opposition to Prop 14 at the Redlands Tea Party debate last January. I apologize for this error when I said that he supported Prop 14 today.

Here's the problem: he supported Prop 14 when he ran for office in 2012.

OK, he acknowledged that at the Redlands Tea Party debate in 2018.

Here's the thing: when Allen had a chance to vote for a resolution to repeal Prop 14 on the floor of the California Republican Party convention, he voted AGAINST that resolution (I have voted for every resolution to repeal Prop 14 when I became a delegate in January 2017). As long as Prop 14 was helping his political career, Travis Allen was for it. When he was running for governor, and he needed to get clear support from the conservative, i.e. the real Republican grassroots, he declared that he was against it.

Now that it's hurting his bid for California Republican Party chairman, he's clearly against it and his supporters went after me for this mistake. I stand corrected on that.

In stark contrast, Steve Frank has been against Prop 14 since its inception. For the record, that is a better record than mine, since I voted for Prop 14 in 2008. That was a big mistake.

Steve Frank has a better sense of what needs to be passed and what needs to be done to make the California Republican Party Great Again. His political science sense was spot on this issue, and that's not an easy thing.

Steve Frank thinks about what is best for the party. Travis Allen is thinking about what is best for himself.

Republicans are all but extinct from California primaries now
because of Prop 14

By the way, there is nothing wrong with changing your mind, but there has to be a principled reason for doing so. This dithering on the matter is proof positive that--once again--Travis Allen is all about ... Travis. Better channeled, that kind of moxie will fuel another statewide race.

However, that is not what we need for State GOP Chairman. We need a leader who is thinking about "the troops", the delegates, and the needs of the state. Steve Frank has documented what is ailing the state of California or decades, and he has spoken out against the poor leadership that has ruined the California Republican Party, and thus the state of California.

I want someone who wants to make the California Republican Party Great Again, not make his own name great again.

The man for the job is Steve Frank.

Steve Frank for Chairman!

Rhode Island GOP: PawSox Stadium Big Waste of Money

For Immediate Release February 26, 2018

A NEW STADIUM WILL NOT PAY FOR ITSELF

Warwick, RI - For months the PawSox ownership and their allies have been trying to fool the public by claiming that a new PawSox stadium will pay for itself, and today their allies produced a poll trying to show the public would support their new stadium proposal.  In response, Rhode Island Republican National Committeeman Steven Frias commented: “The truth is that a new PawSox stadium will not pay for itself.   First, the PawSox currently do not generate enough tax revenues to pay for a new stadium. Under the proposed legislation, taxpayers will pay $3.2 million a year for 30 years or a total of $96 million. According to RI Commerce, the PawSox generate less than that now. They generate about $1.6 million a year in actual sales and income tax revenues, and some of this income tax revenue withheld during the year is refunded after state tax returns are filed.  Second, the tax revenue estimates are based, in part, on a surge of more than 40 percent in attendance. This is unlikely and certainly not sustainable in the long-run. Since the new Pawsox ownership bought the team, and began demanding a new taxpayer funded stadium, attendance has declined by 20 percent. Building a new stadium will not help bring back fans turned off by the new ownership’s demands for taxpayer subsidies.  Third, tax revenue estimates relied upon by the PawSox are not reliable and can be easily manipulated. When the PawSox wanted to build a new stadium in Providence, their consultants said the new stadium would generate more than $2 million a year. Now, these same consultants say a new stadium in Pawtucket will generate more than $3 million a year. These estimates can’t be trusted.  Lastly, economists are nearly unanimous in concluding that the economic benefits generated by sports stadiums are very small, smaller than stadium advocates say, and smaller than the size of the taxpayer subsidies. There is no reason why a new PawSox stadium would be any different.”

Rhode Island Republican Party | 1800 Post Rd, Ste 17-I | (401) 732-8282 |  WWW.RI.GOP

Indiana GOP: Why Did Democrat Joe Lie About Trump's WINNING Tax Reform?

Hi friends - Remember the radio ad Chairman Hupfer emailed you about a few weeks ago? The one that asks why Democrat Joe Donnelly voted against cutting federal taxes for hardworking Hoosiers? Well, we’ve got big news. Thanks to generous supporters like you who wanted to turn the heat up on Democrat Donnelly and keep the ad on the air, we are now on Rush Limbaugh! After running on stations across the state for two weeks, we are now on the airwaves of one of the highest-rated programs in Central Indiana. If you haven't had a chance to listen to the ad yet, take a listen now. It features two real Hoosiers -- not actors -- talking about the real money they're both saving thanks to President Trump's tax cuts. And, if you can, please consider chipping in to help keep this ad airing border-to-border across the Hoosier State! Thanks, Pete Seat Executive Director of Strategic Communications & Talent Development Indiana Republican Party ___ From: Chairman Kyle Hupfer Date: Jan. 31, 2018 at 5:55:18 PM EST Subject: Why Didn't Democrat Donnelly Tell the Truth?

Friends - Last night at his State of the Union address, President Donald Trump said it best. With the president's tax cut putting more money into Hoosier pockets, this truly is our American moment -- it's time to purse the American Dream! But not if you ask Democrat Joe Donnelly. That's because he voted against these historic reforms, which will place an additional $1,550/year into the pockets of your average Hoosier. Earlier today, our team at your Indiana Republican Party debuted a new radio advertisementasking why Democrat Donnelly said "NO" when asked if he thought you should get to keep more of your hard-earned money.   >>Listen NOW to our new radio ad << The ad launched today in Central Indiana, and will air in all of Indiana's 92 counties starting this Monday. But that's where we need your help. We've put five-figures behind this ad, but sharing this message isn't cheap, and we need your help making sure we have the funds to keep this ad airing. Listen to this ad, and you'll hear Kelly from Morgan County and Matt from Terre Haute. These aren't actors, they're real Hoosiers, and they each report that they'll see larger paychecksthanks to President Trump and Hoosier Republicans -- and no thanks to Democrat Joe Donnelly. In fact, Kelly's family of two adults and four children will save $2,800/year, while Matt and his wife will save $1,000/year. And it's the same story for everyday Hoosiers across our state. Of course, if you listened to Democrat Donnelly in December, you heard him say that this tax cut would only benefit "the wealthiest Americans, while raising taxes on a majority of families making less than $75,000." And now -- with stories of Hoosiers like Kelly and Matt being told across the state -- we know that Donnelly was flat wrong. Why didn't Democrat Donnelly tell the truth? What's in it for him? With Hoosiers going to the polls in just a few short months, they need to know that Democrat Donnelly voted against cutting your taxes. As Hoosiers see their paychecks rise in the coming weeks, they need to be asking these important questions. Would you be willing to chip in $25, $50, $100, $250 or $500 to help make sure we can keep this message running on the local airwaves in your region of Indiana? Help us elect a Republican to the U.S. Senate in November who stands with President Trump, and who will vote to cut our taxes and energize our American economy, helping us each pursue our version of the American Dream. Help us share this important message today. Thanks, Kyle Hupfer Chairman, Indiana Republican Party P.S. Democrat Donnelly voted against lowering federal taxes for hardworking Hoosiers. If you think that's something your fellow Hoosiers should know, chip in now to help us continue to share this message statewide.

Copyright © 2018 Indiana Republican State Committee, Inc., All rights reserved. You are receiving this email because you opted in. Paid for by the Indiana Republican Party Our mailing address is: Indiana Republican State Committee, Inc. 101 W. Ohio St., Suite 2200 Indianapolis, IN 46204s