Monday, April 15, 2024

Sri Lanka MassResistance Activists Derail Repeal of anti-sodomy statutes


In Sri Lanka: Effort to repeal anti-sodomy statutes derailed, thanks to local MassResistance pro-family activists.

Overcame intense pressure from UN and western nations to turn country pro-LGBT.

But now a new LGBT fight in Parliament over broad “gender” bills.

April 13, 2024
ALT TEXT Our activists in Sri Lanka are thrilled at this victory over Western cultural imperialism, and are getting ready for the next battle.

In August 2023, MassResistance reported that the country of Sri Lanka, a nation of religiously diverse people, was being pressured by Western countries to repeal its long-standing laws regarding homosexual behavior. The aim was to force Sri Lankan society to be “LGBT-friendly.”

The laws in question, which date from the British colonial period, criminalize “carnal intercourse against the order of nature” and “any act of gross indecency” between persons.

However, the prescribed penalties are rarely imposed. As in many locales around the world, these laws act as a barrier to keep homosexuality and transgenderism from being normalized and accepted in society.

Thus, LGBT behaviors cannot be taught in the schools or promoted to children or as part of any “sex education” curriculum. There can be no “gay marriage,” same-sex civil unions, or any gross public display of homosexual behaviors. Even “gender identity” ideology is banned.

Nevertheless, LGBT organizations are allowed to operate openly in Sri Lanka, and even hold “pride” parades. But they cannot include naked bodies or any of the other disgusting sights one sees at those events in Western countries, and the groups are not involved in any way with the government.

The intense efforts to repeal these laws came from the United Nations, along with public and private money from the US, UK, Canada, and other countries. They funded local LGBT groups to conduct an organized pressure campaign, and also exerted direct international political pressure.

ALT TEXT Gay Pride parade in Colombo, the capital city. It's officially called a "Freedom Pride Parade," apparently to avoid any possible problems regarding the current laws - but to demand their repeal. They haven't been successful. [Photo: Kenya Christian Voice]

Since early 2023, MassResistance has been working with local leaders and pro-family activists in Sri Lanka to stop this repeal. We provided a detailed flyer outlining key reasons why the country should not repeal these statutes. We explained how it would lead to future problems. We documented how the proliferation of homosexual conduct and transgenderism harm individuals and overall public health.

Many pro-family organizations around the world gave up or kept quiet on this fight in Sri Lanka. But MassResistance was unwavering and continued to help Sri Lankans to stop this repeal in their Parliament. Our activists around the world contacted local churches, local leaders, and members of Parliament, urging them to oppose the repeal. We also connected with Catholic leaders from other countries, who worked with their colleagues in Sri Lanka.

The last big push came in February 2024. Key LGBT groups held a meeting with the Speaker of the Parliament. But by then the momentum was against them and their efforts fell flat.

After ten months of activism, the repeal effort has effectively died! Our activists have spoken with members of Parliament and local leaders, and according to all of them there is no appetite to move this bill forward.

Our key contact in the country, Dr. Eschan Dias, enthusiastically thanked MassResistance’s contribution! “I am most grateful to MassResistance for your love and support for this country,” he told us. But he added, “We need to keep up in intensity and velocity.” That’s because of the new threat in Parliament.

Two far-reaching “gender” laws filed

LGBT activists and their supporters in the country are now trying a new approach this year to push their LGBT ideology into the country. Two wide-ranging gender-related bills were announced a few weeks ago.

The “Gender Equality Act” would officially define "gender" in the nation’s law to include men and women who identify as transgender, and “any new identities that may emerge in the future.” This is clearly an open door to state-enforced radical sexual and ideological anarchy.

The “Women’s Empowerment Act” is being touted as an effort to allow more women to be in corporate and government positions. But in reality, this legislation would create and force quotas for women and different sexual “orientations” into broad areas of Sri Lankan corporate and public life. Dr. Dias discusses these bills more fully in a recent Substack article.

ALT TEXT As the Sri Lanka news media has reported, the president has caved in to the radicals. But the real power is in the Parliament. And we're working for more victories there!

Relying on the same tactics the LGBT movement has employed in the UN and Western countries, activists are hoping to confuse lawmakers and shame opponents with general terms about protecting women’s rights and ensuring “gender equality” to push the destructive homosexual-transgender cause into the government and public square of Sri Lanka. (A key tactic is to use “gender” to mean both biological sex and “transgender” identities.)

But MassResistance understands exactly what is going on, and will not stand by and let the people of Sri Lanka – or their legislators in Parliament – be bullied and misled by misinformation and propaganda from the LGBT movement. We will make sure they are fully informed.

Final thoughts

The well-funded international LGBT movement, along with with the UN, private organizations, and Western governments, are determined to force those depraved values on vulnerable religious-oriented nations around the world. MassResistance will help their targets fight back against this cultural imperialism!

ALT TEXT Thix X post from our Sri Lanka team says it clearly!
Facebook Twitter Email Print

Please help us continue to do our uncompromising work!

Our successes depend on people like you.

Donate to MassResistance

Your support will make the difference!

Sunday, April 14, 2024

Why Picasso Painted the Way He Did (from Culture Critic)

Saturday, April 6, 2024

The Dude Was Very UnDude: Another Take on "The Big Lebowski"


I do not like "The Big Lebowski."

The film is boring, pretentious, irritating. The Coen Brothers swung and missed with this movie. What really puzzles me is that such a strong cult following surrounds this movie, even a neo-religion and wannabe-hip philosphy.

To me, all you've got is a hollow movie with a bunch of directionless slackers and weirdos, plus a rich guy who shares the same name as the title character, and therefore the "The Dude" gets into trouble on account of the richer Lebowski.

Someone tell me why this is funny.

And someone please explain to me why we should throw out all conventions of reality to accept this very flimsy premise? Deus Ex Machina, anyone?

Besides, who wants to watch a bunch of self-absorbed jerks bowling, anyway?

Still, I wanted to take a closer look at "The Dude," played by Jeff Bridges. What is it that just sets me off about this movie?

Famed film critic Gene Siskel rightly criticized that the character was too self-important, and had no heart.

That made me think of Eric Edson's analysis in The Story Solution on why characters are or are not likeable, and how likeability is an essential aspect to good story-telling.

A main character has to have at least five of the nine traits listed below in order to be likeable:

  1. Courage
  2. Unfair Injury
  3. Skill
  4. Funny
  5. Just Plain Nice
  6. In Danger
  7. Loved By Friends And Family
  8. Hard Working
  9. Obsessed

Reviewing "The Dude" in The Big Lebowski, it's pretty clear that he doesn't have a majority of these character traits.

1. He is not courageous. He doesn't really stand up for anything or anyone. He just cares about his dirty carpet, and he doesn't really care how other people may feel about it. One of his sidekicks, the Vietnam Vet played by John Goodman, has courage, since he's not afraid to bust out his bowling ball to take on some potential kidnappers.

2. The notion of fairness doesn't really come into play with The Dude. He just goes through life, doesn't work, yet somehow manages to survive. He pretty much has everything handed to him, and there is nothing debilitating holding him back. He's like a rich, spoiled teenager in an adult body, and nothing really impacts him, and the things that do bother him or slight, minimal, or just ridiculous for their insignifance.

3. He has no skills. He doesn't accomplish anything. Even his ability, if any, does not stand out when it comes to bowling. You know what? I will give the Dude a point for some skill as a bowler. Let's give him a break.

4. Was Jeff Lebowski funny? Sometimes, but it was not consistent. He didn't really carry the film with any sense or sense of humor. Frankly, he was kind of boring and even a bit irritating. When he engaged in the nomenclature debate with the rich Jeff Lebowski, he states: "You are Mr. Lebowski, and I am The Dude, or his Dudeness, or El Dooderino ..." I didn't think his slacker routine was funny. I also didn't find it funny that he would freak out and his lose his peace over the stupidest stuff, all while the movie was trying to give the impression that he was a loose and listless slacker.

5. He was a decent guy, I suppose, but there were enough scenes were he acts like a selfish jerk that I can't really give His Dudeness any credit on this front.

6. Yes, he faced danger. He was embroiled in the whole kidnapping scenario, and some goons tried to kill him. But even in the face of imminent danger, he generally has this empty nonchalance about him. And that lack of tension really harms the film. You don't care about the stuff that's happening to him, because he doesn't care, and he sure acts like it doesn't matter.

7. He is loved by friends, but he has no family. I will give him a point on this one, since his friends, played by John Goodman and Steve Buscemi, are pretty tight with him.

8. This guy is the archetype of the Professional Slacker. He brags about being unemployed. 

9. He is obsessed with getting his carpet cleaned. He has a focus on something so unimportant, it is still a focus, so I will give him that.

Tallying up the possible traits in the Dude's favor, he only scores only three points: skilled, friends, obsessed. That's it.

The Dude is very Undude. The Big Lebowski is a big bust, in large part because the main character is just undude for all of his Dudeness pretensions.

Why Are You Asking Questions? -- Ben Shapiro

Why do people ask questions?

Some people just want to provoke a response.

Others wish to voice their unbelief or doubt in a position or view.

And yes, there is the vast majority of people who ask questions in order to get answers.

Here, Ben Shapiro confronts the false humility of those who are "just asking questions," when in reality they wish to cast doubt and aspersions on a person's mind and motives:
When Zachariah the High Priest questions the Angel Gabriel, he was expressing doubt.

When Mary, the earthly mother of Jesus, questioned the Angel Gabriel, she was expressing doubt.

When Sennacharib questions King Hezekiah via a letter, he was ridiculing him and the people of Israel.

Right now, what we are seeing on the Right is lots of commentators wanting to promote themselves by "just asking questions" about Ben Shapiro and his support for Israel.

They are not asking questions, they are making allegations without having the courage to state those allegations. They are questioning his and other people's motives, without offering an evidence or reason for their assertions.

This is bad faith, and no one should take them seriously.

Christopher Rufo's Take on the Problems on the Right (Candace Owens)

This past week, Christopher Rufo waded briefly into the "intra-Right" conflict that broke out between Ben Shapiro and Candace Owens, and which ended with Candace Owens leaving The Daily Wire.

Here's his extensive tweet:
Here's the full statement:

I generally avoid intra-Right conflict, but the ongoing Daily Wire-Candace Owens dispute is an important moment for the Right, which, I believe, merits comment.

First, it's not a violation of "free speech" to let a multimillion-dollar contract expire, which is reportedly what happened. The Daily Wire is not obligated to subsidize Candace Owens's speech, especially if she is deviating from the publication's editorial standard or causing problems for the business. DW is not an open platform such as YouTube, Facebook, X, etc., and the owners of a publication are under no obligation to subsidize someone whose trust and friendship they no longer enjoy. Owens spent months taking public shots at @benshapiro and @JeremyDBoreing, which is a tacit request to get canned and then play the martyr.

Owens is a gifted speaker, who has been able to turn controversy into attention—a valuable capability—but she does not advance a serious politics. She is clearly traveling down an ugly, but, unfortunately, well-trodden path. She has rationalized Kanye West's antisemitic rants, speculated about Jewish gangs murdering people in Hollywood, accused @BariWeiss of being a CIA asset, and claimed that Emmanuel Macron's wife is a man. There is an audience for this kind of material—Inforwars does a robust business in vitamins and emergency prep kits—but it's a political dead end.

Why does this matter? Because the Right faces an inflection point. There are serious people who are trying to advance a serious political movement with a vision for governing—I consider the Daily Wire to be among them. And there are unserious people who are willing to sell kayfabe and conspiracy, leading us nowhere. I care about politics because I believe we have substantive work to do for the country. This requires putting together a coalition that is capable of taking responsibility. The choice is ours.

First, let me state my views on Candace Owens:

1. She is very well-spoken
2. She is well-researched on a number of topics.
3. She is photogenic, which contributes to her charisma, her appeal
4. She is a strong self-promoter
5. She interviews incendiary people and takes incendiary positions to get attention.
6. Ultimately, she got lots of attention because she was an articulate black conservative, and conservative influencers lionized her for more likes, views, and shares.

I have lost a great deal of respect for Candace Owens. She is more interested in making a name for herself than making a difference. She was the face of a somewhat broad movement on the right, Blexit, but what was the result of this movement? Did black voters become Republicans? Did they vote Republican in larger numbers? Did they more strongly embrace our country's civic culture and history?

According to final data from Election 2020, regardless of how disputed the election results remain, the black vote did not shift considerably in Trump's favor. All the government handouts didn't make a difference, and all the diversity rhetoric didn't really matter.

As for Blexit, Candace O made lots of dough, but not much else was accomplished. How many black voters were registered? How many of them registered as Republicans? Do we have any data on these outcomes?

Recently, she began attacking the The Daily Wire and support for Israel. She had the audacity to accuse Israel of being an apartheid state, of resegregating the different ethnic populations in Jerusalem, when different ethnic quarters had existed in Jerusalem for centuries!

She also interviewed Andrew Tate and gave one of the most shameless softball interviews, similar to what Tucker Carlson had also done. Not once did she confront him on the sex-trade allegations. Not once did he push back on his insufferable arrogance. Not once did he really seek fact-finding in her interview with that very disordered man.

She wants to grift, throw bombs, engage in "engagement harvesting" to boost her profile.

And there is no better subject to stir up some populist dissidents on social media than to talk about, and talk badly about, Israel.

She jumped into that fight, she said things about Israel that are not true, Ben Shapiro corrected her, and then she played victim because he corrected her.

This is not serious conservatism. The country is not going to be saved with relentless clickbaiting and engagement harvesting. We need substantive policy achievements and true intellectual activism to turn the constitutional ship of state around.

Rufo's criticism is well-place. We need a robust cultural rebranding in this country. We need to articulate and advance key policies, not just engage in grimy grifting for a quick buck. This issue with putting profit ahead of purpose is particular to the Right, since people on the Right focus on money, economic growth, freedom, and an understandable revulsion to government power.

At this point in our history, however, we need to take back the levers of power and restore natural law and natural order in our country. Headlines, views, debates, relentless chatter are not going to fix what is ailing this country. A profound restoration of our Founding Values, and a commitment to advancing those causes, will restore this country. Candace Owens is not serious about this fight. I agree with Rufo: Shapiro and his team at The Daily Wire are more committed to this effort. Are their tactics and investments the best means for accomplishing these goals? We are still waiting to see those results.

Gay Man Admits: People Are NOT "Born That Way"

Nathan Hochman for DA: Winning in the Polls


Hochman for DA Campaign Update

April 5, 2024
Dear Friend:

We are starting the general election with a strong lead over Gascon, according to a new poll conducted March 24-26 and released this week.

The poll of 817 likely voters in the November 2024 general election found that 44% intend to vote for me, 23% for Gascon and 33% are undecided. I have a massive lead among Republican and independent (No Party Preference) voters and am statistically tied with Gascon among Democratic voters (within the 3.4% margin of error).
The results are not surprising considering Gascon received just 25.2% of the vote in the March 5 primary – the lowest percent received by an incumbent D.A. in Los Angeles County history. No incumbent D.A. with such a low percentage of the primary vote has ever been re-elected.

As you know, this is the most important D.A. campaign in L.A. County of our lifetime – because we cannot afford four more years of Gascon handcuffing prosecutors and standing by as violent and property crime explodes. The quality of our lives and the safety of our families literally will be decided in November.

As one example of what’s going on, the L.A. sheriff’s deputies at the Lakewood station announced the arrest this week of a woman with 24 prior arrests who was on probation for a burglary conviction at the time of her latest arrest.

That news came shortly after news that burglars victimized three small businesses on Colorado Boulevard in Eagle Rock last weekend. When there are no consequences, crime explodes. Gascon has proven that.

Enough is enough! If you are able, please consider helping me raise the $2.5 million it’s going to take to defeat Gascon.

If you're passionate about defeating George Gascón, we invite you to volunteer to get our message out across the county. Whether it's helping distribute campaign materials at a community event, organizing your own event, or engaging with your neighbors, your help will play a crucial role in spreading our message.  To join our grassroots effort, click the button below to get started:
Get a Yard Sign

We also invite you to display our campaign’s yard sign to get the message out in your neighborhood. If you'd like to show your support and help us increase our visibility, we'd be thrilled to get you a yard sign for your home. If there are others that you can reach who will put out a yard sign as well, please let us know and we can deliver their yard signs to you or please ask them to sign up directly with the link below so we can deliver their yard signs directly to them. To receive a Hochman for LA County District Attorney yard sign, click the link below:
Get a Yard Sign

If you are able to support my campaign to restore public safety in Los Angeles County, I would be most appreciative. To donate, click the link below:
Forward and Share

Finally, please forward this email to your friends or send them an email asking them to support Nathan Hochman for Los Angeles District Attorney.

Thank you for your support.
To learn more about Nathan, visit:

Thursday, April 4, 2024

MassResistance Helped CA Father FIght PRIDE Flags in Son's High School

Father sues CA high school over rainbow flag in son’s classroom.

Years earlier, the father was victim of homosexual rape.

MassResistance helped him deal with school officials after they ridiculed him and refused to change the flag policy.

April 4, 2024
ALT TEXT Officials at Venice High School in suburban Los Angeles acted despicably toward a traumatized family that did not want the LGBT agenda pushed on their sons.

The LGBT rainbow “pride” flag is worse than just an anti-Christian political symbol meant to normalize sexual perversions and disordered behaviors. It can also be traumatic to those who have been physically and psychologically damaged by that “movement.”

A horrible story

In 2022, Brian Selem, a father in suburban Los Angeles, contacted MassResistance.

He had a horrible heartbreaking story. As a teenager he had been drugged and gang-raped by a group of homosexual men on multiple occasions. He was naïve and an easy target for the perpetrators who groomed him. It was such dreadful experience that it took years before he could even process what had happened to him. He is now married with two sons in school. But it continues to be a terrible debilitating nightmare that, despite counseling and support, has affected his life intensely and never leaves him.

Brian is not alone. Since the so-called “gay rights” movement became institutionalized in America, hundreds of thousands of boys and men have suffered homosexual rape, according to reports. Even the pro-LGBT New York Times admits it: More than 100,000 men have been sexually assaulted in the military in recent decades. Yet the problem of homosexual rape is rarely covered by the mainstream media.

So, when Brian sees the LGBT Pride flag flying, it elicits intense disgust and revulsion in him. Many people are willing to understand that and respond to his concerns. For example, Brian’s barber took down the rainbow flags in his shop out of respect for Brian’s pain.

At his son’s high school: more pain and demeaning treatment

Unfortunately, school officials typically have no compassion or interest in the feelings of anyone who disagrees with their agendas. That negligence has directly affected Brian.

Brian’s sons attend Venice High School in the West Los Angeles area. One of his sons was enrolled in an English class where the teacher prominently displayed the LGBT pride flag in her class.

When Brian visited that classroom during Back to School Night in September 2022, he confronted the teacher about the flag. He described to her what had happened to him and how that flag is psychologically and emotionally triggering to him and family members. His son should not have to sit in class and have to look at it, he insisted to the teacher. And if nothing else, he asked, why aren’t other viewpoints allowed?

Initially, the teacher acquiesced and said she would take down the flag, though Brian noticed she smirked at another staffer in the room at the time. But the next day, Brian’s son informed him that the flag was still in the classroom. Brian’s wife also contacted the teacher to ask it be taken down, but was ignored.

It got much worse. A few days later, the teacher brought in a “Restorative Justice” lecturer to talk to the English class. The message was that homosexuals and transgenders are victims who deserve apologies or reparations in some form from the rest of society. The speaker brought up Brian as an example of an offender because he opposes the school’s view on homosexuality and transgenderism, and even disparaged his son. It was clearly meant to humiliate Brian and his son in front of the class.

Brian was very upset. He arranged a meeting with the school vice principal and guidance counselor to discuss what had happened. But both officials refused to comment or take any corrective action. Instead, they insultingly referred Brian to the school district’s Diversity Department for re-education. (How outrageous that a high school has an office dedicated to indoctrination!)

MassResistance helps Brian deal with the school

At that point, Brian contacted MassResistance and we discussed the situation with him at length. Since the high school principal was the final authority in that building, we suggested he should insist on talking with her – even though she may want to avoid dealing with him. We worked with him on making the meeting happen, and also on the points he should bring up and how he should deal with any objections, purposeful misdirection, or double-talk.

Brian had also found out that both his sons had been given homework, surveys, and other materials referencing anal sex, oral sex, and other LGBT behaviors. But Brian had notified the school several times in writing, as California’s opt-out law allows, not to expose his children to any sexual content, imagery, or activism. That was also to be brought up at the meeting.

Brian was able to meet with the principal on October 14, 2022. He talked in detail about his emotional situation and what had happened to him. But she appeared unsympathetic and was very uncooperative. She refused to give Brian details about the Restorative Justice speaker’s agenda or background. She would not address his other specific complaints. She simply acknowledged that what happened was wrong, and again referred Brian to the school district’s Diversity Department (as the others had done).

We continued to work with Brian, but the school officials closed ranks like nothing we’d ever seen before. It reeked of ill will and even seemed demonic, given what had happened to Brian and how their actions served to torment him.

Brian sues the school district!

In early January 2024, Brian’s lawyer formally filed a lawsuit in Superior Court against Venice High School and the Los Angeles Unified School District. Technically, the lawsuit is filed by Brian on behalf of his son.

The lawsuit cites eight California statutes that the school has allegedly violated in their treatment of Brian, their refusal to comply with the opt-out laws, their refusal to notify parents regarding speakers, civil rights and disability obligations, and other blatant violations.

The suit is asking for damages, citing intentional infliction of emotional distress and negligence. It is seeking injunctive relief, including compliance with all of the California statutes – and also removing all LGBT flags and other symbolism from all classrooms unless the district allows flags and symbolism of countering viewpoints alongside them.

We are awaiting the school district’s reply to this lawsuit. It should be interesting! We will keep you informed.

Final thoughts

This lawsuit is a commendable development – and something that needs to happen across the country! Brian is a true hero for everyone.

A lot of parents would back down to the hostility of the teachers and the stonewalling of the officials. They would also be reluctant to reveal such horrible and humiliating personal experiences in public. But Brian is not backing down. We wish more people had his strong principles.

We all know that the environmental poisoning in the high schools of America goes beyond flag displays. The intense promotion of all things LGBT – via the curriculum, GSA clubs, brainwashed staff, guest speakers, etc. – is toxic to everyone and must be rooted out.

Facebook Twitter Email Print

Please help us continue to do our uncompromising work!

Our successes depend on people like you.

Donate to MassResistance

Your support will make the difference!

Saturday, March 30, 2024

Open Letter to the Archbishop of Canterbury, by Matthew Charles White

Open letter to the Archbishop of Canterbury, the Most Reverend Justin Welby, head of the worldwide Anglican Communion.


This letter was previously sent directly to Archbishop Welby, but was evidently not shown to him. The reply from a “safeguarding officer” was a form letter that failed to address the issues raised. Believing those issues to be important, the undersigned invites concerned persons and/or organizations to repost it.


Dear Archbishop,


I write as a practising Christian man born in England, baptised and raised in the Anglican Church, who is a survivor of multiple incidents of childhood sexual abuse by homosexual men, including an Anglican priest (name will be supplied on request).


I was dismayed to read in a recent newspaper report that you “joyfully” welcomed proposals to bless same-sex married couples. What, I ask, is there to be joyful about when there is clear evidence that homosexuality embraces blatantly unhealthy, injurious and, in some cases, vicious practices, and that its victims include many children?


The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC), the leading United States public health service organization, regularly publishes detailed statistics about sexual health. Results of surveys differ, but it is probable that homosexuals and bisexuals actually comprise no more than 3.5% of the population — far less than LBGTQ+ propaganda routinely claims. Asexuals are estimated to comprise less than 1%, so 95.5% are heterosexual, i.e normal (typical, usual, or ordinary). These numbers are intended to place the following statistics in context. The numbers vary slightly from year to year but the CDC have reported that:


Males (including boys) who have sex with men (MSM), most of whom are homosexual rather than bisexual, accounted for 70% (22,400) of the 32,100 estimated new HIV infections in the USA, and 86% of estimated infections among all males (2021).


The estimated lifetime risk for HIV infection among MSM is one in six, compared with heterosexual men at one in 524 and heterosexual women at one in 253.


HIV negative MSM are 20 times more likely to be diagnosed with anal cancer.


MSM are significantly more likely than heterosexual men to have gonorrhoea (30.31% vs. 19.83%), early syphilis (1.08% vs. 0.34%) and anal warts (2.90% vs. 0.26%). They also account for 55% of all HIV infections while representing only between 2% and 6.8% of the U.S. population, and are infected with intestinal parasites at more than four times the rate of heterosexual men. In the case of the relatively new viral infection human mpox (popularly called monkeypox), the CDC reports that 94% of cases reported recent male-to-male sexual or intimate contact.


While sexually transmitted diseases (STDs) affect individuals of all ages, STDs take a particularly heavy toll on young people. The CDC estimates that youth ages 15-24 account for almost half of the 26 million new sexually transmitted infections that occurred in the United States in 2018. By the current United Nations definition of a child (i.e. a human under the age of 18), this means that nearly eight million of those newly infected were very likely children.


Dr. John Diggs, a medical doctor and Christian from South Hadley, Massachusetts, has been treating homosexual men and women since the HIV/AIDS outbreak in the early 1980s. He has  warned that society has been too quick to accept the homosexual lifestyle — ignoring the serious medical, psychological and possibly deadly risks and consequences for those who engage in homosexuality. Inter alia he has written that (apart from the diseases I have already mentioned) the following diseases have extraordinary frequency among “gay” men: chlamida trachomatis, cryptosporidium, giarda lamlia, herpes simplex virus, isopora belli, viral hepatitis types B & C. Further, he has stated: “The transmission of some of these diseases are (sic) so rare among heterosexuals as to be virtually unknown.”


Sadly, despite his decades of dedicated work, Dr. Diggs has been mendaciously denigrated by some homosexuals as being a homophobe, as indeed, have the authors of many of the studies I cite, and as I, too, have been for my 2012 book on the homosexual abuse of minor children Gay Lies — Sad Truths (Huxley’s Books, ASIN:  B009PNKYI6). Such wholesale disparagement is, of course, not surprising given the the concerted efforts by homosexual advocacy groups (the “gay” lobby to suppress criticism and to cancel — i.e. to harm — those who seek to tell what to them are unpalatable truths.


Unfortunately, many people, including large numbers of Christians, appear to have swallowed the lobby’s propaganda and have allowed themselves to be brainwashed into accepting the dogma that any critique of homosexual culture, regardless of how genuinely well intentioned or justified, is per se a mark of intolerance, oppression and even hatred.


Among aspects of homosexual conduct that are surely not just antithetical to joyfulness but are downright evil and therefore justify severe criticism, is the intentional transmission of HIV (and other diseases) by HIV-positive men to their HIV-negative sex partners. Variously called generationing, stealthing and/or (contemptuously) gift-giving, this results principally from “barebacking”, a not uncommon practice in which the penetrator purposely engages in unprotected anal sex. Who would do that and why, you may ask? Well, ballet dancers Rudolf Nureyev and Gary Burne, and singer Freddie Mercury were all notoriously reputed to be gift givers. All three died prematurely without, so far as I am aware, regretting that their callous appetites can hardly have failed to infect some (many?) of their sex partners with life-shortening diseases. One hopes that these “lovers” were at least consenting adults, even if they were not fully informed as to what they were consenting.


Children under 16 in the UK cannot, by law, consent to sexual activity. It nevertheless happens on a very large scale. Data published by the Office for National Statistics (ONS) in January 2020 shows about 709,000 men in England and Wales were victims of sexual abuse before the age of 16. As most studies indicate that the majority of child sexual abusers (at least 80%) are male, then MSM are likely to account for more than 567 000 of these cases.


Is this not also evil? It seems to me to be perfectly clear that Jesus considered it so, given his injunction in Luke 17:2 (and a similar one in Matthew 18): “It were better for him that a millstone were hanged about his neck, and he were cast into the sea, than that he should offend one of these little ones.”


LGBTQ+ communities, from either ignorance or dishonesty, routinely deny that homosexuals are unduly attracted to children as sex partners, and endlessly repeat that the majority of sex offenders against children are heterosexual. This is misleading and deceitful, however much the innumerate may be taken in by it.


Firstly, as can be calculated from figures given above, heterosexuals outnumber homosexuals and bisexuals more than 27 times.


Numerous studies attest to the proportionally far higher rate of sexual activity between homosexuals and children than between heterosexuals and children. For instance, a study published in the learned journal Archives of Sexual Behavior found that: “Pedophilia appears to have a greater than chance association with two other statistically infrequent phenomena. The first of which is homosexuality… Surveys estimate the prevalence of homosexuality, among men attracted to adults, in the neighbourhood of 2%. In contrast, the prevalence of homosexuality among pedophiles may be as high as 30% to 40%.” ( Blanchard, Ray et al: Pedophiles: Mental Retardation, Maternal Age, and Sexual Orientation. Archives of Sexual Behavior, April 1999 [Volume 28, Number 2], pages 111-127, <>)


The findings are supported by other peer-reviewed studies, e.g.:


A study by Groth and Birnbaum found that approximately one-third of all cases of child molestation involve an underage boy and an adult male.  (A Nicholas Groth and H Jean Birnbaum: Adult Sexual Orientation and Attraction to Underage Persons, Archives of Sexual Behavior 7, no. 3 (1978): 175. <>


A study by Freund and Watson found that in North America homosexuals account for more than 33% of all reported child molestations. (Psychological Reports, 1986, 58, pp. 327-37, cited by Frank Joseph, MD, in his Internet post Everyone Should Know these Statistics on Homosexuals. <>


A follow-up study by Freund et al noted that “... the proportion of sex offenders against male children among homosexual men is substantially larger than the proportion of sex offenders against female children among heterosexual men... the development of pedophilia is more closely linked with homosexuality than with heterosexuality.” (Freund, Kurt et al: Heterosexuality, Homosexuality, and Erotic Age Preference. Journal of Sex Research, February 1989, Volume 26, Number 1, pages 107-117. <>)



Using the figures that present the least bad case, i.e. the case that reflects the lowest rate of child sexual abuse, then: Homosexuals and bisexuals, who are currently reckoned to constitute no more than 3.5% of the population (though LBGTQ+ sources claim it is higher), commit 30% of reported child molestations. Simple subtraction tells us that heterosexuals, who constitute the 95.5% of the population, commit 70% all reported child molestations. This means that, at the very least, homosexuals and bisexuals perpetrate child sexual abuse at more than 11 times the rate that heterosexuals do. The actual figure is thought by some researchers — and may well be — even higher.


Another important and entirely separate study also points to the significantly higher level of depravity exists among homosexuals than heterosexuals. The study Do Those Who Engage In Homosexual Sex More Frequently Rape and Murder The Underage? A Test Of Traditional Moralit, was published in the Empirical Journal of Same-Sex Sexual Behavior Volume 1 No. 20, © 2007. It concerns the rape and murder of children, and is based on an analysis of newspaper reports indexed by LexisNexis, the world’s largest electronic database for legal and public records information.


In the 25 years from 1980 to 2005, 668 reports about the rape and murder of children (again defined as those under the age of 18) were analysed in more than 50 major newspapers indexed by Lexus-Nexus. The analyses found that 202 (or 30%) of those stories involved perpetrators who engaged in homosexual sex, and that “about three-quarters” of all the children victimized were aged under 13.


30% is, please recall, the same proportion that has found to have been perpetrators of other varieties of child sexual abuse. So, by the same arithmetical process, homosexuals are more than 11 times more likely to rape and/or murder children than are heterosexuals.

It is important to note that denial that sexual activity between adults and children is harmful is common among pederasts, paedophiles, hebephiles, ephebophiles, homosexuals and their supporters. Peter Tatchell, a self-identified homosexual activist with whom you claim to have held a “constructive dialogue”, has (despite later protestations and “clarifications”) vehemently sought to minimize the perception that the sexual abuse of children causes them harm.


In a speech to the Sex and Law Conference in Sheffield in 2010, he said: “Despite what the puritans and sex-haters say, under-age sex is mostly consenting, safe and fun. It does not result in any damage. If there is harm caused, it is usually not as a result of sex per se.”


That this is a long-held view is clear from Tatchell’s 1997 letter to The Guardian defending the book Dares to Speak: Historical and Contemporary Perspectives on Boy-love edited by Joseph Gerachi, which states that it “offers a rational, informed perspective on sexual relations between younger and older people” and documented “examples of societies where consenting inter-generational sex is considered normal, beneficial and enjoyable by old and young alike.”


Tatchell has stated elsewhere, including on his own website, that:


“… the positive nature of some child-adult sexual relationships is not confined to Western cultures.”


“… it is time society acknowledged the truth that not all sex involving children is unwanted, abusive and harmful.”


Reinforcement of this view is apparent in an interview, again posted on his website, with “Lee”, whom he describes as a“bright, articulate, sure-of-himself, and mature beyond his years” 14 year-old who claimed to have been having sex with boys since the age of 8, and with men since he was 12.


Further, in a fulsome obituary Tatchell described Ian Dunn, a co-founder of the Paedophile Information Exchange (PIE), an organisation that, before it disbanded, campaigned to legalize sex between adults and children, and to promote acceptance and understanding of adults having sex with children, as a “pioneer for lesbian and gay human rights, remaining a central figure in the battle for homosexual equality…for 30 years.”


In a chapter he wrote for the book Betrayal of Youth, or BOY, edited by the vice-chairman of PIE and paedophile ring member Warren Middleton (also known as John Parratt, who was sentenced to 12 months imprisonment after being convicted of making drawings of children being raped), Tatchell stated that the concept of an age of majority serves no purpose other than “reinforcing a set of increasingly quaint, minority moral values left over from the Victorian era.”


Since the adverse publicity generated by the exposure of the perverted activities of members of such groups as PIE and the North American Man/Boy Love Association (NAMBLA), many proponents of LBGTQ+ causes have denied having ever supported paedophilia or paedosexuality (in general usage, both terms include pederasty). One of the strongest denials appears in an undated post published online by USA Today, which has the fourth-largest circulation of any newspaper in the USA. The article, headlined “Fact check: LGBTQ community rejects false association with pedophiles” quotes Rich Ferraro, chief communications officer of the Gay & Lesbian Alliance Against Defamation (GLAAD), who states, inter alia: “No LGBTQ organization has condoned pedophilia…”


This is simply untrue as any competent and honest fact-checker could have established within minutes, if not seconds.


The Gay Activists Alliance not merely condoned paedophilia, it was instrumental in founding NAMBLA, while Zymurgy, Inc., an LBGTQ+ non-profit company (not to be confused with the brewing company of that name) fronted for NAMBLA in order to allow the association to benefit illegally from its tax-exempt status for the spreading of its baleful credo.


The International Lesbian and Gay Association (ILGA), which has a North American & Caribbean chapter and United Nations consultative status, formerly represented NAMBLA among more than 1,600 affiliated organisations worldwide. ILGA actively campaigns for adult-child sex via the elimination of  “all laws and policies … that limit the exercise of bodily autonomy, including laws limiting legal capacity of adolescents to provide consent to sex”. The World Health Organization, please note, defines adolescent as “those between the ages of 10 and 19.


Among the most egregious and uncompromising condonations — indeed, it amounted to a full-on endorsement —of paedophilia by a United States LGBTQ+ organization was a conference held at Tufts University on the 25th of March 2000. Called “Teach-Out”, but better known as “Fistgate”, it was organized by the Gay, Lesbian and Straight Education Network (GLSEN), which was founded by President Obama’s “Safe Schools Czar”, Kevin Jennings, a proselytizing homosexual. Children as young as 12 were encouraged to attend, and many were bussed in from around Massachusetts to meet homosexual and paedophile activists from across the country. The conference received its cognomen after Margot E. Abels, an employee of the Massachusetts Department of Education, gave children at a workshop a graphic account of “fisting” (inserting an entire hand into another's anus or vagina), which she described as “a very emotional and intense experience.”


In Britain, PIE received support from, among other organizations, the Albany Trust (which was founded to complement the Homosexual Law Reform Society), the Campaign for Homosexual Equality, Gay Left (a collective of  “gay” men and a socialist journal of the same name) and the Spartacus International Gay Guide.


Other paedophile groups having links with LBGTQ organizations are numbered among the 40 associations on Wikipedia’s List of Pedophile Advocacy Organizations (


As previously noted, Tatchell is a particularly fervent advocate of lowering the age of consent for homosexual sex. One key consequence of the Labour Party’s legislation (Blair’s Buggery Bill, as it was appropriately called) to bring this about was that, in the decade from 1999 (the year before the homosexual age of consent was reduced to 16) and 2008, the annual number of new cases of sexually transmitted diseases soared. During 2008, 7,298 people were diagnosed with HIV in the UK — more than double that of 1999, according to the international HIV and AIDS charity AVERT. And, according to the UK Health Protection Agency (HPA), a major cause of the rise in the incidence of STDs in the UK was an increase in unsafe sexual behaviour among young people, those aged 16-24 years being most at risk. (Sexually transmitted Infections and Young People in the United Kingdom: 2008 Report, HPA Centre for Infections, July 2008.)


Many who claim to be Christians apparently agree with much of what Tatchell preaches. Despite his frequent and virulent attacks on Christianity, he received a standing ovation at the 2010 Greenbelt Festival. How many of those who stood and applauded had accepted his false statements on the harmlessness of adult-child sex, I wonder?


Fortunately, most members of the 2014 Independent Inquiry into Child Sexual Abuse established by the UK government did not. The high risk of disease aside, among their findings were also:


Child Sexual Abuse can have wide-ranging and serious consequences. For some victims these effects endure throughout adult life. Child sexual abuse can affect psychological and physical well-being, family and intimate relationships, faith, and education and career. Victims and survivors can also be two to four times more likely to become victims of sexual, physical or emotional abuse again in their lifetime.


One of the most profound effects of child sexual abuse is the damaging impact it can have on the ability to form and maintain close, loving relationships &#8210; both intimate and platonic. It can affect the relationships that victims and survivors have at the time of the sexual abuse and for the rest of their lives. They may find it difficult to talk to partners, family and friends about the sexual abuse, preventing others from being able to help and offer support. 42% of victims and survivors who participated in the Truth Project have said that child sexual abuse has adversely affected the relationships they have with others.


Child sexual abuse can cause difficulties in forming intimate and trusting relationships. Relationships can remind victims and survivors of the sexual abuse, and there may be emotional barriers that make it difficult to talk about sexual abuse with partners.


There is much more I could write, but I shall end by asking you to acknowledge that a large number of Anglicans and you personally, despite your many good works, have exhibited reprehensible moral and intellectual cowardice in the face of the ongoing woke assault on Christian teachings and civilized values. I strongly suggest that much more than a pallid apology and passive repentance are required. You and others in the church need to take urgent action to ameliorate the great damage you have caused by failing to resist the spread of this pernicious culture.


Yours sincerely,


Matthew Charles White