Friday, July 31, 2026

Supervisor Hahn Enjoys Easy Photo-Op on Metro -- What About the Rest of Us?


 

Supervisor Janice Hahn recently posed for a clearly staged photo-op while talking up the addition of a Metro rider to the Metro Board ('Metro may add rider to its board,' July 23, 2026).

She has it so easy: she has lots of staff, and no doubt plenty of security was watching out for her during the photo shoot.

What about the rest of us, who are not so lucky or well-off?

Will she take steps to ensure proper policing on the LA County Metro trains?

The lack of public order on public transit is a real problem, and adding a rider to the Metro board is not going to fix that.

Independent journalist Christopher Rufo recently exposed a range of dangers in and around train stations. Women have suffered sexual assault, homeless vagrants terrorize commuters, and there is little done about it.

Instead of photos and breezy press reports, when will Supervisor Hahn and the rest of the Board take steps to ensure proper public safety and enforcement of quality-of-life laws in and around the stations?

MyPillow Guy Smothers Campaign

 


MyPillow CEO Mike Lindell has quite a story. He doesn’t just manufacture great pillows. He’s an unabashed patriot, and he has consistently confronted Election 2020 integrity concerns with courage. Unlike Fox News, which decided to settle, Lindell showed commendable resolve, forcing Dominion to drop their lawsuit against him.

His background story is praiseworthy, too. Before becoming a Christian, he was a cracked-out drug addict. His dependence was so bad that even his dealers wouldn’t give him drugs when they noticed that he had been going without sleep for days! He survived, and now he thrives.

Mike Lindell is the embodiment of the American Dream. He suffered through adversity to success. He makes a great product, earns lots of money, and he puts part of his profit to good use for love the country that blessed him these wonderful opportunities. Furthermore, he’s not ashamed to share his Christian faith or his fervent support for President Trump.

With such a great background and record, his decision to campaign for governor on amnesty is beyond disappointing.

Truth be told, I don’t think he’s the best candidate to run for Governor. Minnesota is still a left-of-center bastion. For decades, Minnesota Republicans distanced themselves from the national party, just like their Democratic counterparts from the DNC, due to the progressive foundations. An independent streak is essential. In general, activists don’t make great candidates. They have spent decades sharing their opinions and taking stands on controversial issues without regard to nuance--and they have the broad social media profiles to prove it. Running for office requires less “Tip of the Spear” and more “Meeting of the minds.”

Winning elections requires more than running rallies or saying great things on TV. Candidates have to connect with everyday people, and they need to come off as down-to-earth, interested in the day-to-day issues of voters, not just partisan activists who want to talk MAGA all day. Lindell is a party loyalist to Trump. He will face more hurdles than opportunities with that alone.

Minnesota is still not easy territory for Republicans, even though the Minnesota Republican Speaker Lisa Demuth (also candidate for governor) has worked incredible wonders stopping the worst excesses of progressive knucklehead Tim Walz and the Minnesota Democratic Farm and Labor Party.

Is there a chance that Republicans can capitalize for victory? Of course. In 2016, Trump was just 40,000 votes away from snatching Minnesota from Hillary Clinton. A Trump victory would have been a Republican feat forty-four years in the waiting. However, in 2020 and 2024, Trump lost by seven and four points. If Minnesota Republicans want to take back their state, they need to message MAGA principles while sounding “Minnesota Nice” and cracking down on the rampant immigrant fraud in the state.

However, being nice doesn’t mean that a candidate should turn a blind eye to illegal immigration.

The rampant welfare fraud and the repeated anti-ICE protests across the Twin Cities prove that this midwestern state is Ground Zero for the Trump Administration’s crackdown on illegals. No Republican candidate can win if they start moving to the left on this issue.

And yet, that’s precisely what Lindell did.

Here are key, disturbing points from his interview on CBS Minnesota, where he laid out a really bad immigration program:

1.      He claimed that the immigration system is broken. Red flag right away. If the federal government enforces the law, which Trump is doing, then the system works. If states would comply with federal law, then nothing would be broken. The problem isn’t the systems. It’s the bad actors who don’t comply.

2.      He talked about his trip to California to purchase supima cotton crop for his MyPillow company. The farmers told him about how competing farms were hiring illegals, paying them way below market wages, and that such competition was driving them out of business. The solution is not to enable more illegals, Mike. And California is not Minnesota. Who cares what those farmers think? Have you talked to Minnesota farmers?

3.       Lindell insulted millions who have been victimized by illegal immigration when he stated—with a straight face: “Illegal immigrants are good people. They’ve never committed a crime. And they’re in hiding.” Are you kidding me? I wanted to stifle my screams with a MyPillow when I heard those remarks. Illegal immigrants, by their very status, are already committing a crime! Of course, they shouldn’t be in hiding, because they should be leaving, going back to their country! And since when does it matter whether they are good people are not?! Enforcement of our immigration laws is not a popularity contest.

I would expect to hear something that egregious from someone on the left, from retiring Governor Tim Walz, or US Senator and gubernatorial candidate Amy Klobuchar. But for a MAGA Republican like Mike Lindell to start talking like a Big Government-Big Business Bush Republican, one has to ask: Who is consulting for this guy?!

4.      He spent some time in the interview talking about how illegal immigrants are themselves victims of crime. Americans have had to listen to these brazen attempts to tug on our heartstrings for years. After four years of Open Borders Joe Biden flooding the country with illegals, and allowing migrants to overwhelm major cities, Americans have had enough. Illegal aliens are in the country … illegally. If they don’t want to be victimized, they should return to their home countries.

Speaking of victims, how about focusing on Americans, Mike? Would he like to meet with the Angel Moms and Dads whose children were killed by illegals? Would he care to speak with business owners in major cities who compete with under-the-table contractors and sidewalk vendors, all operating illegally and undercutting their business? How about some respect for the American taxpayer who has been repeatedly fleeced and robbed by illegals scamming our welfare systems and taking advantage of public education and local hospitals, which per federal law cannot turn away patients.

5.      The last insult in his interview, Lindell discussed handing out work VISAs to illegals so that they could work American farms without fear or arrest and deportation. What happened to American workers? What happened to ensuring law-abiding employment? This proposal is more DIGNITY Act nonsense, with no dignity and lots of disgrace.

Republican candidates with a fighting chance to win statewide office in blue states have to pick their fights, but they have to fight for the issues that resonate the most with the base, then make their case to the rest of the state. Affordability issues are ravaging Minnesotans’ wallets and budgets, just like everyone else’s. Most Minnesotans like their guns, even if they’re leery of constitutional carry. Walz’ latest gun control efforts went out with a bang (Thank you again, House Speaker Demuth!).

I thought Republicans had learned to ignore the sob stories of the “poor illegals” and focus on poor, hurting Americans. Does Lindell think such a bleeding-heart pivot will help his chances?

Despite well-deserved backlash, Lindell has been doubling down on his amnesty proposals. At this point, he’s smothering his campaign chances. Minnesotans must elect a serious Republican who can read the room, get the votes (without amnesty-pandering), and save the state come November.


Thursday, July 30, 2026

Denying the Holocaust: Deborah Lipstadt, Revisited

 


Over 30 years ago, historian and social critic Deborah Lipstadt wrote a powerful book, Denying the Holocaust, warning the public about the dangers of this pernicious ideology. This year, I was drawn to this book because debates are raging again, this time amplifying across social media, about the truth of World War II, what happened in the death camps, and how we sift out the truth from the lies.

I wasn’t expecting to agree with her on everything. She’s an unabashed liberal, progressive, even. Her ideological bent was crystal clear when President Joe Biden nominated her as US Special Envoy to Monitor and Combat Anti-Semitism in 2022, for which she received unanimous confirmation. During her confirmation hearing, Republican members confronted her over a number incendiary, inflammatory, even libelous statements that she had published about them as well as then former president Donald Trump. One of her targets, Wisconsin US Senator Ron Johnson, confronted her about her nasty remarks directed at him over the January 6th incident. She didn't look very good trying to defend the indefensible, and she ultimately apologized.  She ultimately got the job because Democrats control the US Senate at the time, and no one wanted to appear opposing the fight against anti-Semitism, no matter the appointment.

Despite her current left-wing bent, Lipstadt is a fierce defender of freedom of speech. During an Oxford Union speech in 2016, she declared that Holocaust deniers should have the freedom of speech, including the right lie about history. However, historians must have the right to call them out for their dishonesty, too.

As for her book, her extensive research and discussion on the Holocaust, the Denialist industry, the tactics used by the Deniers come off as very current, even though she wrote the book three decade ago. Indeed, underneath the surface of seeming scholarship and respectability, once finds a morass of bitterness and bigotry against a group of people. Their relentless determination to blame Jews for all the ills of the world comes out in page after page among Holocaust deniers, even if they have Ph.Ds. and claim that there works is exhaustive research.

Before talking about specific deniers—institutions and individuals—Lipstadt announces in her first chapter that she refuses to debate Holocaust deniers. They are repugnant not merely for holding noxious views, but for their deliberate refusal to recognize the copious archives, research, and data affirming the horrific systemic slaughter of six million Jews under Hitler’s Third Reich. In her view, a debate with a denier is to legitimize their views as serious scholarship or opinion.

Throughout her book, I reflected on that notion, and I found that it does have some merit. You don’t debate people who have no serious regard for truth, evidence, integrity, or process. Why give them a platform? Then again, the survivors, the historians, the archivists all have a responsibility to debunk the lies and keep telling the truth.

 

Throughout the book, her political bent was crystal clear, which is the only defect. She spent a great deal of time attacking right-wing interests and organizations for promoting Holocaust denial. She criticized patriot groups, liberty groups, and even the John Birch Society in the same sentence as discredited Holocaust denial organizations. I know many John Birchers, and they are not hostile to Israel nor do they traffic in Holocaust denial.

I wonder what Lipstadt is responding to the growing anti-Semitism on the left. From the Democratic Party’s growing demonization of Israel, to the repeated attack against Jews as “privileged members of the intersectionality hierarchy”, including the recent decision by civil rights attorney Alan Dershowitz to leave the Democratic Party over its overt anti-Semitism, the Left has transformed into the repository of Holocaust minimalism and outright denialism.

Of course, there's one other problem fundamental to her work. She treats Nazis and national socialists as right wing. Reviewing the Nazis’ politics and policies policy, it’s clear that they were a left-wing ideology, complete with the nationalization of industries, universal health care schemes, gun control, massive government spending, and an abusive expansion of the state to undermine individual liberties. In this regard, sadly, Deborah Lipstadt engages in a little revisionism of her own. Yet her bias does not negate that dangers of Holocaust denial and the necessary responses to combat it.

Putting aside the criticisms, Deborah Lipstadt's book was very informative. I learned about the incredible work of Mel Mermelstein, a Holocaust survivor who lived through Auschwitz, immigrated to the United States, settled in Long Beach, California and then took on the challenge from the notorious Holocaust denier pseudo historical journal the Institute for Historical Review. The specific account is fascination: the IHR offered $50,000 to Holocaust survivor who could prove that Jews died in gas chambers. Mermelstein took the challenge, even though many Jewish groups had discouraged him. Not only did he win the contest, but he took IHR to court and forced them to pay a larger award for pain and suffering! Leonard Nemoy started in a TV movie retelling the story.

Lipstadt goes to great length to document it not just the truth of the Holocaust, but the extensive research behind it, and she even goes into length how Holocaust deniers exploit and distort the evidence to push their destructive, false narrative. She calls out specific pamphleteers, and how all too often they merely reference each other to create this cloud of credibility around their work.

She pays considerable attention and elucidates true historical revisionism. When it comes to interpreting the facts of history, revision is not only essential, it’s endemic. Historians are always piecing together the evidence before them, seeking patterns and searching out causes and effects. What revisionism cannot do, Lipstadt affirms, is change the facts, ignore the truth, or lie about the evidence itself. Holocaust deniers routinely engage in those vile practices.

Also to her credit, she spends an entire chapter castigating college newspapers around the country who printed advertisements from Holocaust deniers. Many of the newspapers, their editing boards, and the administrators at the respective campuses engaged in an extensive, rigorous debate about whether freedom of speech should require the newspapers to print the ads. This section of her book was particularly intriguing, because she did a thorough job of exploring the different points of view, even though she was critical of many of them. 

She maintained that no newspaper should have posted the advertisements. Since in her view, such publication would lend credence and legitimacy to Holocaust denial views. Furthermore, some of the advertisers gave the impression that the deniers were offering only a difference of opinion. No—they were categorically lying, like claiming that 2 + 2 = 5 or that George Washington never existed. That is not a matter of opinion or interpretation, Lipstadt affirms. Furthermore, private newspapers have the right and responsibility not to print lies, nor are they bound by the First Amendment to print everything submitted to them.

 After reading Denying the Holocaust, I appreciated Lipstadt calling out the cowardice and collusion of the universities and printing houses. Her takes against the Holocaust denial industry are relevant today. We should appreciate her stand for truth, even if her politics is misguided or just plain wrong.

 

 

 


Monday, July 27, 2026

MassResistance Takes on GSA's Part 8: Outside Groups Professional Organizations Pushing GSAs

 

MassResistance Special 10-part Report:

Why LGBT “GSA Clubs” must be banned from all public schools.

Part 8: How outside legal groups and “legitimate” professional organizations promote and defend GSAs in schools

They also intimidate parents and conservative school committee officials who disagree

July 27, 2026
ALT TEXT School officials and parents get propaganda from all sides on how they "must" allow destructive GSAs in their schools. But in fact they don't have to — and shouldn't.

National LGBT organizations are not the only ones behind GSA clubs (“Gay Straight Alliance” or “Genders and Sexualities Alliance”) found in thousands of schools across America. National professional organizations and legal groups also prop up that corrupt project.

In Part 2 of our GSA report, we described how these clubs get into K-12 schools. We noted that GSAs are not like other school clubs such as a chess club, a science club, etc. Their goals include normalizing homosexuality, transgenderism, and similar perverted behaviors in the school and the surrounding community.

GSAs are not organic; kids would not naturally think of starting one. They are professionally organized by activist adults and brought into the schools through sophisticated organizing and propaganda techniques.

To counter any pushback from school officials or community members, these national LGBT groups have developed forceful (though completely dishonest) talking points to intimidate and silence opponents to GSAs. And should objections to a GSA in a school system continue, the LGBT movement has more ammunition.

“Legitimate” professional organizations

Numerous professional associations (representing teachers and schools administrators, mental health professionals, physicians, counselor associations, etc.) also support the LGBT movement’s effort to push and keep GSAs in schools. The major organizations include:

American Psychological Association (APA)
Centers for Disease Control (CDC)
National Education Association (NEA)
American Academy of Pediatrics
National Association of School Psychologists
American Association of School Administrators
American Counseling Association
American Federation of Teachers
American School Counselor Association
American School Health Association
National Association of Secondary School Principals
National Association of Social Workers
School Social Work Association of America

Unfortunately, too many school administrators – even many “conservative” ones – blindly follow the misguided advice these associations put out.

The American Psychological Association (APA) published a resource, Just the Facts About Sexual Orientation & Youth, meant to convince school principals and administrators across the country to support LGBT “diversity” policies in schools.

ALT TEXT A shocking pantheon of formerly trustworthy professional organizations have sold out to the LGBT movement.

In addition to the booklet’s overall strong advocacy of the normalization and support of homosexual, bisexual, and transgender “identities,” it includes statements from several of the organizations from their specific professional perspectives.

The Centers for Disease Control (CDC) has posted this troubling statement endorsing GSAs in schools:

Several practices can improve the health, safety, and school connectedness for LGBTQ+ youth by addressing stigma and bias. Among them are conducting professional development with school staff, allowing LGBTQ+ students equal access to student-led clubs, and creating inclusive school and district policies. … Students in schools nationwide have created and led clubs where students with LGBTQ+ identities and their allies can socialize, provide support, and work together to create safe and supportive school environments. …

The APA also collaborated with the Los Angeles Children’s Hospital to recommend “establishing and sustaining GSAs” in the Los Angeles Schools.  The CDC helped fund that “Safe and Supportive Environments” initiative through its DASH funds (Division of Adolescent and School Health). The premise was “HIV prevention.”

The American Academy of Pediatrics (a noteworthy member of the above-mentioned “Just the Facts” coalition) also published a separate policy statement. Titled “Ensuring Comprehensive Care and Support for Transgender and Gender-Diverse Children and Adolescents,” it discusses “safe schools,” cites data from GLSEN, and notes the value of GSAs.

The National Education Association (NEA) collaborated with the ACLU, Gender Spectrum, Human Rights Campaign, and National Center for Lesbian Rights to publish “Schools in Transition: A Guide for Supporting Transgender Students in K-12 Schools.” It pushes the “safe spaces” that GSAs impose on schools:

Creating school environments that respect and affirm gender diversity will empower all students rather than limit them. GLSEN’s study on the impact of Gay-Straight Alliances, for example, suggests that such organizations create school environments where all students are less likely to hear homophobic slurs.

The “Schools in Transition” report also suggests how to handle “unsupportive parents.”

ALT TEXT The NEA has teamed up with the worst possible groups on these issues.

Legal groups

There are also well-funded legal groups providing guidance and legal support to the adults and students engaged in GSAs. They employ (largely unsupportable) legal arguments to prevent or quash challenges to the GSAs. These invariably include a heavy reliance on threats to invoke the Equal Access Act. (Unfortunately, local school attorneys are often intimidated by these threats. In Part 7 we exposed the Equal Access Act as basically toothless.)

These radical legal groups include:

Lambda Legal
GLAD Law
ACLU
National Center for LGBTQ Rights (formerly National Center for Lesbian Rights)
Harvard Law School LGBTQI Advocacy Clinic
Transgender Law Center
Southern Poverty Law Center
U.S. Department of Education (Office for Civil Rights)

ALT TEXT Lambda Legal, like the ACLU, focuses its resources on suing conservative schools over GSAs. But their legal grounding is thinner than people realize.

GLAD Law (GLBTQ Legal Advocates & Defenders), based in Massachusetts, brags about the legal help it has given, forcing schools to allow GSAs. GLAD cites the Equal Access Act as the basis:

ALT TEXT This was passed out at "Youth Pride" events.

The ACLU uses the Equal Access Act to bully schools across the country to allow GSAs. It claims victories in protecting GSAs, largely through reference to that 1984 law. It has posted a template letter for use to instill fear of a lawsuit in a school administrator who opposes a GSA. It summarizes their defense for GSAs:

First page of ACLU’s 4-page threat letter to school superintendents:
“Allow the GSA or we’ll see you in court.”

ACLU and GLISTEN (formerly GLSEN) jointly authored this pamphlet (below): “Know Your Rights: A Guide for Transgender and Gender Nonconforming Students.” It summarizes their arguments on students’ free speech at school and what counts as “disruption” of educational time. It encourages students to file complaints if their “rights” to form a GSA are violated.

ALT TEXT This ACLU pamphlet cites a laundry list of federal laws and even the US Constitution to threaten schools into normalizing students' sexual perversions. But it's basically all scare tactics.

GLISTEN/GLSEN also supplies these additional resources for arguing for the legality of GSAs.

The U.S. Department of Education still posts this Biden-era 2023 document that advocated for GSA legality, citing court cases of losing efforts to shut down GSAs while ignoring much of the actual wording of the Equal Access Act.

ALT TEXT The US Department of Education still has this on its website - likely because its bureaucrats still believe in it.

Final thoughts

It’s shocking how many major “trustworthy” institutions have cowered before the poisonous LGBT radical agenda and are pushing it on vulnerable schoolchildren.

To an unsophisticated school administrator, school board member, or school attorney who objects to having a GSA at school, it seems the facts and the law are overwhelmingly stacked against him.

But if you drill down and do the research, you will find that the claim that GSAs are legally untouchable is a well-crafted illusion. The “facts” are either distortions or completely phony, and the legal arguments are easily dismantled. It just takes some courage, principles, and perseverance.

Facebook Twitter Email Print

Please help us continue to do our uncompromising work!

Our successes depend on people like you.

Donate to MassResistance

Your support will make the difference!

Friday, July 24, 2026

Lyin' Ted Wants a Kill Switch

 I don't trust this guy with anything that has the word "kill" in its name.


Image
Visit My WebsiteFacebookTwitterYouTubeContact Me

Dear neighbor, 

Last weekend, four American service members tragically lost their lives in the war with Iran. My sincere condolences go out to their families and loved ones.

trump sent our military into harm’s way for an illegal war without a strategy. We still don't have trustworthy answers on how many service members have been wounded or killed, or what the plan is to end the war. My colleagues and I pushed to introduce a War Powers Resolution to end the war, and it passed the House on a bipartisan basis this week. We need Senators to keep trying to pass a War Powers Resolution.

Video
Play Button

While Americans suffer at the gas pump and the grocery store for an illegal war of trump’s making, the American public and Congress alike are denied answers. What is the cost? Who is winning? If Iran’s military is “obliterated” as trump claims, how are they successfully bombing U.S. bases and killing our troops? 
This week, I asked trump’s UN Ambassador, Mike Waltz, how many service members have been injured. His gross underestimate was either a blatant lie or a clear indication that the trump administration does not care about our troops. Watch the exchange below. 

Video
Play Button

Yesterday, Congressman Nathaniel Moran (R-Texas) and I introduced the AI Kill Switch Act that would require developers of the most powerful AI systems to maintain the technical capability to throttle, suspend, or shut them down. 

I am very aware of the dramatic possibilities – both good and bad – that AI presents. We are moving from AI that answers questions to AI that takes actions, whether that be executing financial transactions or controlling transportation systems or engaging in cyber defense and offense. Unfortunately, powerful AI systems can go rogue, behave in extremely dangerous ways, or even resist human intervention.

It is imperative that these AI systems have kill switches so we can keep this technology from causing catastrophic harm, and that the federal government has the clear authority and process to shut down rogue AI models. Read more about my bill here

Image

CONCERTS IN THE PARK: Looking for something fun to do on a hot summer night? Whether you’re looking for a date night, a solo outing, or something the whole family can enjoy, our community has something for everyone. Find a list of activities here: Torrance, Manhattan Beach, Santa Monica, El Segundo

CONGRESSIONAL APP CHALLENGE: Every year we challenge students to create and submit their original apps for a chance to win the Congressional App Challenge. All middle and high school students living in CA-36 are eligible to participate and may compete in teams. View the full 2026 rules and guidelines here. The deadline to submit your app is October 26, 2026, at 9 AM PT. 

Image

My Los Angeles office is available to help with federal agency issues at (323) 651-1040, or you can visit our webpage here

I look forward to updating you again soon.  

Warmly, 

Ted W. Lieu 
Member of Congress

Letter to the Editor: Hatred of Data Centers



El Segundo residents are celebrating the cancellation of a data center in their city.

Their outrage is not isolated, as a widespread backlash against data centers has erupted all over the country.
I have heard many complaints about them, including a possible increase in electricity fees for residents as well as concerns about water usage.
However, I think the resurgence of this Luddite mentality is misplaced.
Technological innovation includes improving production and processes so that companies use fewer resources and create less waste or have a less disparate impact on a community. Data centers want to consume fewer resources in the long run to maximize profit, do they not?
Data centers are part of the AI revolution, and the South Bay should be on the cutting edge of welcoming, improving, and marketing this technology instead of hastening to stop it or get rid of it.
The South Bay has been developing a reputation as the next headquarters for major industrial shifts. We are still a major player in the aerospace industry, after all. We should not shy away from becoming Silicon Beach because of dubious concerns about environmental impact or potential higher costs.
Besides, none of us should want international adversaries like China gaining the upper hand when it comes to AI and future tech innovations.
I hope that residents throughout the region will get more educated about data centers and change their minds about them when (or if) another company offers a proposal to construct one in the area.

Thursday, July 23, 2026

The DSA Will Make the DNC DOA



Random Lengths News calls out the corrupt Democratic Party establishment (DNC) and reports their well-deserved doom from Democratic Socialists of America (DSA) challengers. For decades, they placated the radical left wing with lofty rhetoric and empty promises. After screwing over Bernie in 2016, the DNC’s restraint on the DSA has collapsed, and those energized activists are seizing control of the party from within.

The DSA takeover started in 1972 with McGovern’s failed nomination, then continued through Jimmy Carter, who embraced abortion, gay rights, and the Department of Education. Bill Clinton’s “New Democrat” course correction proved useless in the face of the growing socialist uprising. By the 2012 DNC convention, radicals booed God and rejected Jerusalem as Israel’s capital, forcing party leaders into awkward damage control.

The DSA takeover achieved new milestones in June. Socialist NYC mayor Zohran Mamdani’s latest Congressional endorsements have purged so-called moderates. Rep. Jerry Nadler retired, along with Rep. Nydia Velázquez. Rep. Adriano Espaillat and hard-core anti-Trumper Rep. Dan Goldman lost to Mamdani’s challengers, too.

The DSA is brooking no compromise. They want single-payer healthcare, climate-driven central planning, defunding the police, expansive identity-based policies, and fervent opposition to Israel. Will this platform win back working-class voters? Do these positions sound like political winners?!

I doubt it.

I have only one question for the rising DSA wing of the Democratic Party: are you prepared for a long political wilderness in minority-party status? Americans hate socialism, support Israel, and seek government competence. The DSA will make the DNC DOA.

Tuesday, July 21, 2026

Just Pick a Time Already!

 


In a rare showing of long-overdue bipartisanship to solve an issue which has become a non-issue, the House of Representatives just passed the Sunshine Protection Act to make Daylight Saving Time (DST) permanent. This latest legal battle has been raging for the last few years. It started during the Biden Administration, incidentally enough, but it never made it to his desk. Who knows if he would have signed it, since he wasn’t signing much of anything, right?

With Trump back in office, he has lobbied for an end to the time chances. Trump’s signature on this wonderfully bipartisan piece of legislation would be another win and a great addition to his welcome legacy.

I am all for getting a uniform time system in place. No matter what the reasons were in the past, the country should finally settle on a uniform time system, one that won’t require the changes twice a year—and all the health problems that come with it. To summarize, DST causes disruptions to Americans’ circadian rhythm, which can unleash all sorts of negative consequences. Every time the time changes, there’s a sudden burst of heart attacks, strokes, and other problems. Let’s end this.

Besides, the change is government-imposed will from previous demands, most of which were temporary when they started. Congress needs to get this micromanaging out of our lives for good and focus on other substantive issues, ensuring a brighter future for our country, no matter how much sunlight is shining in the sky.

Of course, all of this clock-switching and wrangling over daylight saving brings up the question:

Why does the United States have this strange chronological two-step every year in the first place?

It’s all about war, and it didn’t start with us, incidentally enough!

To be accurate, sections of Canada began experimenting with the daylight time changes for farming and other purposes long before any war broke out. Those efforts remained very local, though. During World War I, Germany was the first country to implement DST. Starting in 1916, the Central Power wanted to prolong daylight to save fuel for the war effort by reducing the need for artificial lighting. The U.S. followed suit in 1918 with Congress’s Standard Time Act for the same reason… but the time change was repealed after World War I. No one died when Standard Time was restored. It wasn’t the end of America. Everyone went about their business, including big business, agricultural interests, and everyone else.

Daylight Saving Time resurfaced when World War II broke out, and our country needed as much light as possible for the same resource reasons as in World War I. We won that war, and the federal DST regime was repealed; the United States reverted the power to states (and even local regions) to do what they wanted, going with Standard Time or DST as they pleased.

Time waits for no man, however, and uniform standards are essential for understanding and planning when different sections of the country are in different time zones. Planes (they came soon enough), trains, and automobiles faced all kinds of problems navigating the different states with their unique times and time zone preferences. Radio broadcasts found the lack of uniformity disconcerting, as well.

To solve this problem, Congress passed the Uniform Time Act in 1966 (one of the few good things accomplished by Lyndon Baines Johnson), which standardized DST for the whole country, and also legislated when daylight saving time would begin and end throughout the year.  Finally, Congress solved the standardization problem. However, the health issues and the general disruption of changing clocks twice a year would continue for everyone (Except Arizona and Hawaii, but that’s another story).

Americans have endured fifty years of this springing forward and falling back. I’m sick of it. It’s like some old relic, all coming from wartime, an anachronism proving yet again that government intervention knows no bounds. Times have changed, agricultural methods have improved, and everyone has technology to light their way, whether driving to work or getting to school. The United States has never been more energy dominant and independent, so concerns about fuel costs and availability don’t matter anymore.

To go with Standard Time or Daylight Saving Time is now a matter of preference. Lots of interest groups are going to be happy or unhappy either way, so let’s put aside their discomforts.

The frustration for me ultimately comes down to the simplicity. For centuries, Americans—colonists then citizens--didn’t complain about the rhythm and availability of sunlight from season to season. Americans managed; they made it work; they lived their lives in line with nature. For what it’s worth, I don’t recall General George Washington losing any battle with the British or President Abraham Lincoln trying to harness the sun’s power for war, playing with Father Time or Mother Nature to ensure military victories.

If they could manage, so can we.

Now that different sections of the country have gotten used to a certain rhythm, though, they simply don’t want any disruption. I must admit that the opponents of making Daylight Saving Time permanent have a point: do we want children to go to school in the morning when it’s still dark outside? Then again, those same kids went to school when it was dark, and there was no daylight saving time for them for decades before. Are we saying that the kids can’t handle the change today? We have better technology, more sophisticated methods for keeping kids safe. The United States is not facing an energy crisis, even while contending with our worst global enemy, Iran. Trump made sure of that.

The important point now is to stop the clock changes altogether. It’s to get uniformity without the arbitrary time changes. Widespread support for the current bill should shut down further discussion. US Senator Tom Cotton, however, wants to block the bill, sharing concerns about the darker mornings in winter.

We should note that this year’s legislative attempt would not be the first time that the country scrapped the time changes in our recent past. Because of yet another energy crisis (the OPEC oil embargo), President Richard Nixon signed a law, making DST permanent for the country. However, there was widespread outrage (as expected) over the change. From dark commutes for the adults, to long dark waits for kids going to school, to farmers' complaints about shifting their agricultural operations, Nixon and Congress realized they had a problem on their hands—plus they didn’t save that much energy to begin with!

The DST changes went back into effect, and then Congress added a few more weeks in 2007 with the Energy Policy Act of 2005.

The American people have adapted to change before, and we really should end this time-switching. It’s time to move into the 21st Century. Cotton is wrong, and he should shut up about the whole thing. Congress should pass the Sunshine Protection Act. Hey, I wouldn’t mind if the powers that be changed the bill to Permanent Standard Time, but the point is to make the change. Sure, there will be some grumbling, but probably not as much, and everyone will get used to it.

Just pick a time already!

LAUSD: Morally and Financially Bankrupt

 


Los Angeles Unified School District is having a hard time paying the bills, teaching the kids, and thus keeping its doors open.

Clearly, the administrators, bureaucrats, and the elected Board of Trustees don’t handle addition and subtraction all that well. The district is failing basic math, and not just for the students.

According to ABC News Los Angeles, LAUSD is on the brink of bankruptcy:

The Los Angeles Unified School District could run out of money within about a year and is showing severe signs of financial distress, according to county education authorities.

 

The nation's second-largest school district, which serves more than half a million students, faces possible insolvency, prompting the Los Angeles County Office of Education to take action.

 

The district's last student population estimate listed 497,105 enrollees. That’s LESS than half a million. Even ABC News is having number troubles.

 

 

What happened, and what could happen if the district doesn’t get its act together?

 

Officials cited massive union contracts estimated to cost more than $1 billion annually, along with declining enrollment and reduced state funding, as factors contributing to a growing deficit and the possibility of state oversight.

 

"Worst case scenario is the state takes over, and this goes under receivership under the state, and that takes a long time to get out of, and it is really hard to maintain any control over curriculum, over class size," Bacall said.

 

I am shocked---SHOCKED— (not!) that the school district is going belly up, and the parents are taking their students out.

The warning signs had been blaring for years.

The usual suspects cannot be ignored, and are easy to catalogue:

·         Plummeting Enrollment

·         Rising Inflation

·         Excessive Pensions and Salary Costs

·         Administrative bloat with Diminished Transparency and Oversight.

·         Lawsuit payouts

The biggest killer, obviously, is the plummeting enrollment. Los Angeles Unified kids aren’t learning, that’s for sure. According to US News and World Report, math proficiency scores have been plummeting across all grades. Reading scores show some progress from elementary to high school, but less than half of LAUSD high schoolers are proficient.

In the real world, companies without customers close down. In perverse contrast, government institutions get their money, whether they serve or not.

And LAUSD is not serving the public interest.

On top of that, LAUSD schools are not even safe. The students routinely run into abuse and harm from their peers—and sometimes their teachers! The rising rates of violence are frequently on the news. The feds could pull their funding because of the rising number of predator teachers who get transferred instead of incarcerated!

Getting a bad education from LAUSD was expected, but the student population was still relatively high.

Twenty years ago, I was a French teacher in South Gate, in a new school built on the site of an old General Motors plant. New school, lots of students (almost 3,000!), and there still weren’t enough classrooms. I had 45 students in one class! I could barely move around the room, and some students feared for their safety if there was a fire. When I threatened to call the fire marshal, the union rep leaned on the assistant principal, who moved three students out and dumped them in a P.E. class—those poor teachers had to deal with 70 students per period!

 

See how only three students were removed. Not much help there! Notice the bureaucratic hustle to get something done, too.

 

Fast forward to now, and LAUSD high schools, on average, manage around 1,000 students. Some of the schools should have been closed by now!

 

What changed the student population, then, if the bad education wasn’t enough? The dam broke with the COVID outbreak, which ended parental non-involvement. COVID-19 may have shut down the schools, but the whole ordeal opened the eyes of parents throughout the state. They saw the left-wing garbage their children were forced to learn. They saw the bad curriculum, the lack of attention to detail, integrity, and success. Los Angeles parents had had enough, and they voted with their feet, sometimes moving their kids to local districts (Downey, Torrance, Wiseburn Unified in the LAX-area are some notable examples), or they just left the state entirely.

 

COVID was a tipping point for another reason. Five years ago, I joined LAUSD teachers and parents protesting the outrageous health mandates from the district to “protect the kids.” Political affiliation or ideological leanings didn’t matter to all concerned attendees. Employees, students, and parents across the district protested in front of 333 South Beaudry, demanding that the district rescind its onerous vaccine mandates and mask rules and keep the schools open!

During the main rally after our march around the district office, teachers complained about the increased burden of contending with discipline issues and health demands. Then one of the students addressed the crowd, and her comments worked out to something like this: She lamented all the woke nonsense being shoved down her throat. She was tired of hearing all the race nonsense. She was tired of learning about the LGBT agenda and sitting through all the sexual diversity displays. Her summation was crystal clear about LAUSD, that they were not teaching anything, and then they make them wear these stupid masks, too!

Despite the rallying cry of parents and teachers, the district kept cracking down on the holdout teachers, staff, and students who had refused the jab. Facing the dim prospect of never entering the classroom again if they refused the dubious poke, students left.

The district didn’t care. They were looking for absolute obedience from the rank and file. If you didn’t step up, you got the boot.

And the teachers union—ULTA (United Teachers of Los Angeles)—didn’t care.

Five years later, their wicked, progressive partisanship could not be clearer. They don’t focus on education. They focus on leftist politics and progressive activism. In 2025, I was stunned by the large number of UTLA teachers protesting at Elon Musk’s Tesla headquarters in Hawthorne, CA. Didn’t they have more important things to do, like grading papers, preparing lessons, and contacting parents?

Their most pressing concern was stopping federal cuts to public education and the Department of Education. What they refuse to talk about—and this returns to the bureaucracy issue—is that public education could accomplish great things for students and parents with half the overhead, more accountability, lots of school choice, and efficient hiring and firing practices.

UTLA shouts “DOA!” at all of these reforms.

And the parents say, “CU Later.”

And now LAUSD announces that they’re broke.

Frankly, this is a fitting end for one of the largest school districts in the country. This kind of disruption, the cold equations of supply and demand, will do more to clean out the left-wing corruption that has marred states like California and New York while also limiting (and perhaps one day) shutting down the inordinate power of the National Education Foundation and the attending teachers unions across the country attached like tentacles to this destructive interest group.

LAUSD has been morally bankrupt for a long time, much of it from a corrosive teachers' union, inept and cowardly politicians, and misplaced priorities. Now their fiscal bankruptcy has come, and not a moment too soon.

Monday, July 20, 2026

Thanks to MassResistance activism, Texas State GOP Convention continues to condemn the LGBT agenda in its platform

 

Thanks to MassResistance activism, Texas State GOP Convention continues to condemn the LGBT agenda in its platform

Following overwhelming win after win on that issue by our pro-family delegates.

This year the Texas LGBT Log Cabin Republicans simply gave up trying to change it!

July 20, 2026
ALT TEXT This 2022 headline says it all. We defeated them so badly in 2022 and 2024 that they just gave up in 2026!

If your past record is strong enough, sometimes just showing up is all it takes to win again. That’s the political lesson for today from MassResistance! It certainly worked at this year’s Texas State GOP Convention.

The Texas State Republican Convention is held every two years. In 2022 and 2024, the MassResistance delegates were outnumbered by the LGBT contingent. But our people were far more successful and built up an unstoppable momentum leading into this year’s convention (held June 11-13 in Houston).

Here’s what happened:

At the 2022 Texas GOP Convention, we got a strong plank passed opposing “gay rights.” It was a real battle at first. MassResistance delegates Tracy Shannon and Kevin Whitt successfully led a bitter fight in the platform committee to get the language Homosexuality is an abnormal lifestyle choice” before the full convention.

At the full convention vote, the LGBT contingent was well organized to stop it. But Tracy, Kevin, and the MassResistance team outworked them and were more vocal. The convention overwhelmingly passed it. Here is the text of that platform plank:

Homosexuality is an abnormal lifestyle choice. We believe there should be no granting of special legal entitlements or creation of special status for homosexual behavior, regardless of state of origin, and we oppose any criminal or civil penalties against those who oppose homosexuality out of faith, conviction, or belief in traditional values.

Getting this passed was a shock to the LGBT movement. Within a week, the Chairman of the Texas Log Cabin Republicans resigned over that defeat.

See our 2022 report: Texas LGBT Log Cabin Republicans” group admits defeat – after Texas MassResistance gets strong anti-gay” language inserted into state GOP Party Platform.

ALT TEXT Tracy Shannon (left) and Kevin Whitt giving delivering strong statements to the 2022 Texas GOP Platform Committee.

Two years later, at the 2024 convention, the Log Cabin Republicans regrouped and were determined to remove that plank from the party platform. But Tracy was ready for that.

Speaking before the full convention, Tracy pulled no punches. She said that there can be no neutral position when it comes to this issue. If the party backs away from it, then it essentially endorses the lifestyle. A watered-down version was attempted, but that failed. The plank remained!

See our 2024 report: MassResistance Texas leader keeps anti-LGBT-agenda plank in state GOP Party Platform

ALT TEXT Tracy Shannon takes charge and rallies the 2024 convention not to back down.

At this year’s 2026 convention, Tracy was there and prepared for another big fight. But this time the Log Cabin Republicans made no attempt to fight it! They didn’t even bother to contest the plank with a minority report, Tracy told us. They knew we had them beaten!

It was a great victory without a shot being fired!

And more

This wasn’t the only victory. Since 2020, Tracy and the MassResistance delegates have also been leaders in two other battles in the Texas GOP convention:

  • Keeping the traditional marriage plank (marriage = 1 man + 1 woman) in the platform.
  • Keeping the Log Cabin Republicans from being allowed to have a booth at the convention.

Both of those were upheld in the 2026 convention.

Coming in 2028: Tracy’s next convention battle will be to make an important change to the GOP’s plank on “gender identity.” Currently, the GOP platform opposes allowing sex change operations for anyone 26 or under. It also supports criminal prosecutions for anyone performing such procedures on minors.

Tracy says, “Why just for ages 26 and under? Why can’t we stand against ALL so-called sex changes?” The whole ideology is based on lies, and no society should tolerate it. We anticipate her winning that one, too!

Final Thoughts

All this is yet another example of where a few people have made a tremendous difference – often in the face of seemingly overwhelming opposition!

As we continue saying: It may look like you’re outnumbered and out-funded – but it’s only an illusion to believe that you can’t still do great things. Just jump right in! MassResistance will help you.

ALT TEXT
Facebook Twitter Email Print

Please help us continue to do our uncompromising work!

Our successes depend on people like you.

Donate to MassResistance

Your support will make the difference!