Words You Can Spell with "Teacher"

1. Tar
2. Tea
3. Tear
4. Cheat 
5. Chart
6. Her 
7. Here 
8. Hear
9. Ache
10. Cat
11. Chat 
12. Char
13. Hat
14. Hate
15. Hater
16. Hart
17. Heat
18. Heart
19. Reach
20. Car
21. Care
22. Acre
23. Race
24. Crate
25. Each
26. Teach
27. Rat
28. Rate
29. The
30. Three
31. Thrace 
32. Trace
33. Create

Letter to the Editor: Your Arguments Not Likely to Help Overturn Obergefell

In Response to Red States Pay Lip Service To Christianity, But Won’t TouchSame-Sex Marriage

I just read your article "Red States Pay Lip Service To Christianity, But Won't Touch Same-Sex Marriage".

I am against same-sex marriage inasmuch as marriage -- and every secular government-provided benefit that over the years has been added to it -- is for the protection of dependent wives and children.

But the arguments you are using are not likely to help overturn Obergefell.

First, the First Amendment, held via the Fourteenth Amendment to apply to the states, states that the government shall make "no law respecting an establishment of religion".

Legislatures may be allowed to proclaim that "Christ is King" if they want to but the moment that rationale is used as the basis for a law that affects non-Christians, that law will be overturned. Even at the time of the drafting of the Constitution, not everyone in the new U.S. was a believer (e.g. Haym Salomon, the Jew who funded the War for Independence.)

Second, marriage in the United States is purely secular.

The registration of a declaration of marriage is filed with the state via an affidavit that the state requires be witnesses/notarized by certain designated officials. These vary from state-to-state (judges, notaries
public, ship captains, etc.) and, for the purpose of facilitating religious ceremonies, also include religious leaders (pastors, priests, rabbis, etc.)

From the government standpoint the marriage declaration that is filed is for the purpose of identifying "where the families are" for purposes of (originally) inheritance, and later other state-bestowed benefits (joint tax filing, pension entitlement, e.g.)

(This unfortunately has become confused in the past three-four decades in family law, in which the rights and responsibilities of legal paternity do not always adhere to the husband of a woman who gives birth, but have been expanded into a biological tracing, even in the absence of a marriage.)

A couple can have a religious-only marriage by not filing "the license" (which documents status as sui juris and not already married) and not be legally married.

A couple can get themselves legally married by filing the license and declaratory affidavit without a religious ceremony.

The two things, the two concepts, are unconnected.

We are not a theocracy. If you want to prevail, I am here to help, but you cannot use Christianity as the rationale. You need to understand the STATE purposes for recognizing who are legally married, and imposing various state benefits and responsibilities on legal family members, and argue from those.

Elizabeth J. Kates, Esq.

-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Response

Hey, Liz:

Thanks for the thoughtful letter.

You are missing the larger point: it's the hypocrisy.

These legislators care so much about God, and they are not afraid to declare "Christ is King."

But they don't have the courage to restore natural marriage?

It shows that all the talk about Christian faith is just that: talk.

Furthermore, as a member of MassResistance, we stress natural law, natural right, public health, and public order in our efforts to undo Obergefell and restore marriage as a natural bond between one man and one woman.

Thanks for writing.

Visit our website www.massresistance.org for more information.

Sincerely,

Arthur Christopher Schaper

Confronting Phil Ting (D-San Francisco) in 2018

I confronted Assemblyman @PhilTing today:

San Francisco Assemblyman, Your City is a Sh*thole, What Will You Do About It? @YouTube https://t.co/ivhTECkTmH

He did not like what I had to say, but you should have heard his answers, too!@CA_Dem#SanFrancisco @sfchronicle pic.twitter.com/keNolDme47

— Arthur C. Schaper (@ArthurCSchaper) September 22, 2018

Changes in Liberalism and Conservatism

View this post on Instagram

A post shared by Jasmin Laine (@jasminlaine)

Charlee Simons DO NOT TALK: CALIFORNIA GOP Governor Candidates vs. EVERYBODY

Peter Hall Calls out Together for Redlands

 

Message to TOGETHER FOR REDLANDS regarding the last RUSD Meeting on 02/10/2026

Dear Members of the group erroneously calling themselves TOGETHER FOR REDLANDS:

 You are not, as you claim, a non-partisan political action committee; you are an ANTIFA affiliated transgender advocacy group.

Yes, some of the complaints you have against The RUSD are valid; for instance, regarding layoffs, they should cut from the top down instead of from the bottom up; they should also not give themselves pay increases and not give teachers and other necessary staff cost-of-living increases.

That being said I cannot understand how demanding The School Board publicly fly The Pride Flag, and validating the sexual orientations and gender identities of students, staff, etc., is going to make for a genuinely positive learning environment. I sincerely believe that your group and your fellows in California, across the United States, and around the world are encouraging and promoting narcissistic and ultimately self-destructive behavior in the youth. Members of your group constantly complain about witnessing or being victims of physical attacks by students while on school grounds; we must ask ourselves why so many students are suddenly acting this way. What is causing these violent outbursts? I think a large part of it has to do with a lack of discipline and encouraging students to be extremely selfish and only think about themselves; to the extent they think about others at all, is how they can best be used to get what they want.

When you demand the School Board fly The Pride Flag, use They/Them Pronouns, or female pronouns for males, male pronouns for females, etc. and claim not doing so will cause students to harm themselves; you are demanding that WE WORSHIP YOU! And if we don’t, you use the threat of suicide as emotional blackmail.

I also want to talk about your reaction to my brother's public comment about Jeffrey Epstein's email correspondence with a plastic surgeon specializing in so-called "gender affirming surgery." I honestly don’t know why you found what he said objectionable; why you demanded he be silenced and removed. At every meeting you whine about how your rights and freedoms are being infringed upon; you complain about The School Board removing books from the libraries, and how doing so creates barriers to student success; silences voices, makes it so students can’t find people even in books that are like them; you constantly extoll how important it is to have ongoing dialogues about sensitive and controversial topics; but when somebody like my brother brings up something like The Epstein Files, which is a huge matter of public interest; you demand he be silenced and removed. Valerie Tabor going off the rails and cussing out the School Board regarding my brother really didn’t do you any favors. I clipped out her comment, as well as the comments of many of your members.

It really is rich that you people constantly complain about unfair treatment by the School Board when at every meeting you verbally assault Board President Michelle Rendler, Board Clerk Jeanette Wilson, Board Member Candy Olson, and Superintendent Juan Cabral. As I mentioned after Josh was removed, a few meetings ago, Bea Hamilton rudely and loudly interrupted Superintendent Cabral during one of his reports; he interrupted him twice, and nobody told him to leave, or even to be quiet; in fact, Superintendent Cabral barely acknowledged the Interruption. The School Board has given you quite a bit of leeway over the last few years, and you have severely abused it.

Anyway, I've said all I have to say

Sincerely,

Peter Hall

Texas MassResistance: Rep. Dan Crenshaw Hires Log Cabin Lesbian to Smear Rep. Steve Toth

 

Log Cabin "Republican" Lesbian
smears conservatives

Beth Guide is trying to guide the Republican Party to the Left.

She, like many of the homosexual and transgender activists infiltrating political parties across the country, want to normalize perversion at all costs.

And now she's helping RINO warmonger, big-spender, open-border Congressman Dan Crenshaw by LYING about Crenshaw's challenge Steve Toth on his website:

From Current Revolt:

Crenshaw Campaign Vendor Caught Editing Candidate Wikipedia Pages

A Wikipedia account associated with a woman working for the Dan Crenshaw for Congress campaign made negative edits to opponent Steve Toth’s Wikipedia page.

SEO411 LLC was paid $3,099 by the Crenshaw campaign back in October and December of last year.

SEO411 LLC is owned by Elizabeth Guide, who also has a Wikipedia contributor account by the name of “Genxer66”

In October of 2025, Wikipedia editor “Genxer66” made several changes to Toth’s Wikipedia including negative changes highlighting news and bills related to flooding.

Wikipedia edit made by Genxer66

The changes were later reversed after a user noted that Genxer66 had a conflict of interest as well as stating the edit contained false information:

Genxer66 was also highlighted on their Wikipedia profile for having a possible conflict of interest related to “undisclosed financial stake in promoting a topic.”

Current Revolt (CR) reached out to Elizabeth Guide regarding the payments from the Crenshaw campaign as well as the Wikipedia edits.

Guide confirmed she was the webmaster for the Crenshaw website and said that her company was paid for webmaster work, not Wikipedia edits. She initially told CR she did not make the edits to Toth’s page “at all”, she would later tell us that she didn’t remember making the negative Wikipedia edits on Steve Toth’s page. She did confirm making changes on Dan Crenshaw’s Wikipedia page.

“I don’t remember doing it.”
- Beth Guide

Guide also told CR that her password for her Wikipedia editor account was weak and that it was possible someone hacked her account and made the changes under her name.

CR reached out to the Toth campaign regarding the Wikipedia edits. They sent over the following:

“It was recently brought to our attention that an individual has been posting misleading and manipulated information on Steve Toth’s Wikipedia page. This is deeply concerning. In today’s environment, where many voters rely on online sources and AI-driven tools for quick information, inaccurate or false content on widely referenced platforms can significantly distort public perception.

We were also informed that when the inaccurate information was corrected, the same individual immediately reverted the page back to the misleading version. That pattern raises serious concerns about intentional manipulation rather than a good-faith content dispute.

Accurate public information matters. Deliberate attempts to insert or reinsert false claims undermine transparency and mislead voters who are simply seeking reliable facts.”

As the general public has moved towards AI research rather than traditional “google searches” for information, Wikipedia page info has become more important than ever. AI models often rely on Wikipedia for information to display results to users. Wikipedia pages filled with false or misleading information can end up falsely swaying public opinion when users are doing research on candidates.

CR also reached out to the Crenshaw campaign but did not return the call to the campaign in time for publishing.
Editors note: We sent an email to the campaign, but didn’t see the missed call before publishing.