(Response to Pro-Lifers Must Recognize That Abortion Stops Only If Women
Face Consequences)
amthink - schaper - Big A and Big Law - 2026 jul 6
Pro-Lifers Must Recognize That Abortion Stops Only If Women Face Consequences
The Pro-Life movement keeps trying soft approaches to end abortion, but the only thing that will stop the slaughter is for women to know they, personally, are at risk.
= = =
Big A is too durable to control / curtail by whatever 'enforcement' mythology we assert,
and do you think you can get a court criminal conviction? I was a successful jury consultant once, first and last time, and jury nullification is even IN the judge's charge or instructions to the jury, bigly,
no, we can only nibble at this, partial birth abortions and public funding, including tax deductions which ARE public funding, btw, mail order A- pills, Comstock obscenfied gynecology books, oops birth control - yowza!
maybe we go back to Prelapsarian Eden, where Apple? and women were cursed by the pain of child birth, if we pretend to biblicism
I half remember a survey: 100% of men would take a bite of an apple when approached and invited by a naked women ( altho in Ad's case, he didn't have a lot of choice of female companionship )
'took a rib from Adam's side/ gave it to him for a bride'
worth a deep dive
-------------------------------
Dear Martin:
Much of your letter below is difficult to follow, but I will respond as best as I can:
We have to fight for abolition, no matter how unpopular it may be at this time.
Jury nullification is always an issue. Does that mean we don't protect the innocent?
Your argument about the formation of woman from man does not connect clearly with my main argument about holding the mother accountable for the abortion.of her children.
Thanks for reading.
No comments:
Post a Comment