Showing posts with label leadership. Show all posts
Showing posts with label leadership. Show all posts

Monday, October 23, 2023

The Renewed Fight for Speaker: Essential, Not Incidental


October 2nd, 2023 is a date that will live in infamy for politicians who embrace big-spending, do-nothing status quo quiescence. Congressman Matt Gaetz (R-FL) filed a Motion to Vacate the Speakership of the House, and the motion passed the next day. Prior motions to vacate had been filed, and even voted on, but never succeeded until this year. This turn of events is unprecedented, and I submit all for the better.

The Conservative Commentariat has not shared my enthusiasm for this necessary disruption to Congressional Business-As-Usual dithering, bickering, and excessive spending. The hyperventilation from political class Republicans, including strong conservatives not afraid to buck the Beltway Establishment, is really saddening. Their latest source of angst: the Speakership fight which has ground Congress to a halt.

From Ann Coulter to George Will, conservative commentators are convinced that the dragged-out fight over the next Speaker of the House distracts from bare minimum legislating, will drag down the Republican Party and doom the United States to a federal Democratic trifecta for the foreseeable future. I disagree. Even if this fight hurts the Republican Party, or Washington’s diminished sense of solemnity, it was a much-needed tonic disruption.

For the last thirty years, voters have been sending representatives to Washington DC to secure the border, end unnecessary wars, cease the excessive spending (which Congress last achieved on the eve of Clinton’s presidency, only through considerably pressure from a Republican Congress), and restore federalism.

Politicians have not been keeping these promises, especially the Republicans, who barely won a majority in 2022 in part because of ongoing distrust from the base. Republicans in previous terms did very little to stop progressive agendas or the deficit spending, aside from a handful of outspoken conservatives. Republican lawmakers need to show more fighting spirit, the same that DeSantis is campaigning on now. 2016.

When Republicans don’t do their job, how do we hold them accountable? Ditch them during a primary or oust them during the general election. But what about while they are in office? Yes, voters can make phone calls, emails, press conferences, letters to the editor, and other public displays of outrage. Citizens can put together PACs and start blasting their elected officials with commercials on the airwaves.

However, the best way to hold politicians accountable during a legislative session is to delay their power or remove them from power. Speaker Emeritus Kevin McCarthy did not have a smooth transition to the speakership in January, 2023. He hadn’t earned the gavel, having refused to meet with different caucuses within the conference, especially conservatives who wanted key guarantees. Ultimately, McCarthy appointed conservatives to the Rules Committee and offered coveted chairmanships to others. However, he failed to deliver on other promises like providing twelve appropriations bills, stopping the excessive spending, and pushing forward term limits.

In May, 2023, McCarthy all but caved on the debt-ceiling negotiations. He passed increased spending until January 2025 with majority Democratic support. Once against, just like during his tenure as Majority Leader, he let the Democrats run the chamber.  Worse yet, McCarthy dawdled until the end of September to get only three appropriations bills passed. When the fourth failed, McCarthy resorted to another spendthrift continuing resolution, with the help of Democrats.

 

McCarthy’s intransigence on following through on his promises, plus his ready acquiescence to majority Democratic support for key bills, proved to be the last straw for conservatives. Voters and pundits alike should remember that this has been business as usual for Republicans when they controlled the House in years past. Enough is enough! Republicans across the country supported Gaetz’ decision to vacate McCarthy.

But criticisms linger against the Vacate Eight, and they deserve consideration.

Some have charged that Gaetz filed this motion for the celebrity, the grift, and to settle a score. Whatever his reasons may be, the open reality that McCarthy didn’t keep his promises was reason good enough. In politics, motive matters less than the votes themselves. Most politicians do the right thing if it guarantees them re-election, and we want them to cast the right votes, even if for the wrong reasons.

A more substantive criticism implicates the Vacate Eight for not thinking through the larger process. “So, you remove McCarthy. What’s your gameplan going forward?” I explained to one critic that the rest of the conference needed the assurance (or the pressure) to make decisions against leadership. If McCarthy was forced out, the rest of the conference would have been free to (or have to) make decisions for a better speaker.

What if this process drags out even longer?

First of all, Americans should rejoice when Congress is unable to spend money they do not have, whether by squandering tax revenues or increasing the deficit spending.

Second, the Uniparty of “spend more, ask questions never” has been exposed. The Republican electorate sees the members of Congress who are determined to keep the Big Government largesse funneling to the several states, all while our national debt explodes, inflation ravages Americans’ buying power, and foreign countries ditch the US dollar as a reserve currency. All the lip service for controlled spending and balanced budgets amounts to nothing. Primary challenges can ensue in earnest, and perhaps Republicans as a national consensus can force out big spending RINOs on a larger level, and come 2024 get better House leadership, even if Republicans must suffer in the minority for a term.

Third, conservative activists and political wonks need to focus on the factors that create strong Republicans in Congress. Safe districts, sure, but how about representatives who rely on local support and funding for their campaigns? Candidates who have learned to harness media and social media activism to increase their profile while enhancing their grassroots strength do remarkably well in resisting the Swamp. These factors help explain why Congressmen Gaetz, Rosendale, Good, and others have stood strong against the House GOP Establishment.

Rep. Gaetz’ Motion to Vacate was a much-needed house-cleaning for Washington politics. We should relish this period of disruption for potential long-term improvements.

Wednesday, June 14, 2017

On Finding Common Ground and Forming Principled Unity

At the Cudahy City Council meeting last night, one reporter approached me and related his concerns about the escalation of fighting going on in the city.

He said to me: "I know that there are two sides to this issue, but we need to find a meeting point in the middle." The gist of his comments rested on the argument that the pro-sanctuary and pro-enforcement sides would at some point meet in the middle and find common ground.





There can be no common ground about where men and women meet on the rule of law.

Either we have a border for our nation, or we don't.

Either we expect everyone to abide by the rule of law, or we do not.

This meandering moral relativism has gotten too strong in our culture. The idea that solving every problem rests on "meeting in the middle" is precisely the reason why are culture is facing so many crises at this time.

Common ground must stand on common principle. If one side does not believe the other side has a right to exist, there will be no common ground.

On the sanctuary city issue, the crisis is clear as crystal.

One side wants our immigration laws upheld, while another does not.

There is no middle ground here. Either we welcome the enforcement of our laws, or we do not.

There can't be a set of laws for one group of people, then a set of laws for another.

The law is a clear principle of full enforcement for all--or it is no longer "law".

Now, about principled unity ...

I have received criticism from some people because I have openly criticized, shamed, and exposed bad people doing bad things ... and they happen to be Republicans or display support for President Donald Trump.

"We have to work together!"

"We have to fight a common enemy, not each other."

I agree with both of these sentiments.



However, it's impossible to work with other people when they are actively undermining your efforts.

It is also very difficult to work with those who do not share your beliefs, goals, and  morals. There is no agreement. I have heard from a number of people that I should not criticize or call out bad leadership or bad behaviors from leaders or members within the Republican Party or the Trump movement.

But after following through with individuals privately and then in a small group setting, I have no choice but to call people out publicly.

Those are the steps that Christ Jesus laid down for people to follow!

15Moreover if thy brother shall trespass against thee, go and tell him his fault between thee and him alone: if he shall hear thee, thou hast gained thy brother. 16But if he will not hear thee, then take with thee one or two more, that in the mouth of two or three witnesses every word may be established. 17And if he shall neglect to hear them, tell it unto the church: but if he neglect to hear the church, let him be unto thee as an heathen man and a publican. (Matthew 18: 15-17)

These are basic steps to follow. There does a come a point, though, were sacrificing principle for unity ends up causing a team to lose both

That is why I am not afraid to report on unethical, unsound behavior. That is why I respect the concerns of some people in clubs and groups not to confront or report on people publicly--and why I take steps before revealing concerns to the public at large.


When ethical issues arise, when concerns about privacy become a concern, and when criminal behavior lurks on the horizon, I will report something.

Principles first--and the company of fellow patriots will follow. It happens every time.

Tuesday, April 4, 2017

HIRA Demands Answers on Next Hawaii GOP Chair: "How Will You Lead?"

HIRA VOTER GUIDE:
HIRA's Official2017 QUESTIONNAIRE
for State GOP Chair Candidates 
(19 Questions) 



Aloha Republicans:
 
As you probably know, there are currently three announced and/or presumptive candidates for state chair of the Hawaii Republican Party (HRP):  Fritz RohlfingShirlene Ostrov and Andria Tupola.
 
Their candidacies for state chair come at a time when there is so much at stake for the Hawaii GOP.  Our preferred opposition party to the long-ruling Democrats has been declining steadily in the islands for two decades.  Obviously, just like you, the officers and members of the Hawaii Republican Assembly (HIRA) appreciate the significance of the ongoing 2017 leadership contest in which these three individuals are central figures.
 
The delivery of extremely disappointing results by past party leaders are a clear sign that we need to change how we select party officers.
 
Far too often, the campaigns for party officer posts are completely removed and unrelated to the actual issues which vex our long-suffering party.
 
For this reason, the key questions about a variety of pertinent issues concerning the future of our party are left unanswered because candidates and their supporters are merely playing a numbers gamerunning single-issue campaigns which hope to collect enough delegates from their peer groups rather than transparently presenting a comprehensive vision for the Hawaii GOP . . . a vision for which they can be held accountable throughout and at the completion of their 2-year term in office.

THE BIG LESSON 
:  
 
Winning candidates for State Chair have not necessarily delivered winning results for our troubled party.
 
HIRA believes that you deserve to know all the answers to the most basic and pressing questions about how each of these candidates would approach the job of state chair, what kinds of policies they would pursue, and what kind of people they would surround themselves with.
 
That's why, after reviewing a slew of reader mail from across the state, HIRA has developed a 19-question survey.  Our questionnaire (below) asks all of the most compelling questions for which anybody who wants to lead the Hawaii GOP should already have clear answers.
 
Earlier today, HIRA sent this very questionnaire to Mr. Rohlfing, Ms. Ostrov and Ms. Tupola requesting their responses by 5pm, this Friday, April 7th.
 
It is HIRA's intent to help all Republicans in Hawaii by making the views of these three candidates known on a variety of important topics of great interest of card-carrying Republicans statewide.
 
The responses received from these candidates will then be published by HIRA's digital media team so that island Republicans from Hilo to Hanalei can make informed decisions.
 
Moreover, based on these results (plus extensive research conducted by HIRA), you can expect preliminary recommendations for consideration by all Republicans in deciding which candidate should lead our party between May 2017 and May 2019.
 
Thanks in advance to all three candidates for participating in HIRA's survey of candidates for state chair of the Hawaii Republican Party.  And thank you to HIRA members and readers across the state for your kokua in developing this questionnaire.

Finally, due to the importance of this party election, HIRA is seriously contemplating a second survey which focuses on specific public policy issues.  Until then, we look forward to reviewing their thoughtful responses to this first survey.
 
Mahalo,





ERIC RYAN
President, Hawaii Republican Assembly (HIRA)
Chairman, HIRA Action SuperPAC 


HIRA'S OFFICIAL 2017 QUESTIONNAIRE
FOR STATE GOP CHAIR CANDIDATES  (19 Questions)
 
  1. Presently, HRP does not engage in issues advocacy either at the county, state or federal level.  If elected state chair, will you continue refraining from allowing the party and its membership to pursue GOP advocacy, or will you unleash the potential of tens of thousands of members to affect change in Hawaii?
  2. Presently, HRP has a platform (LLIFE) which is officially neutral on the many specific issues affecting the residents and taxpayers of Hawaii.  If elected state chair, will you use your influence to retain the neutral platform?  If so, why?  If not, what changes will you seek?  Will you allow duly elected grassroots members of the platform committee to create a platform without undue influence by party leaders?
  3. Presently, HRP dedicates no time, money or effort to educating and persuading the public in order to make it easier for GOP candidates to win their races,  Will you continue this policy and, if so, why?  If you plan to change this policy, what specific differences will the public notice and will there be a dedicated budget?
  4. Presently, party officers from top to bottom have extremely low expectations of performance and rarely, if ever, have to provide regular reports of their progress (or lack thereof).  Will you continue this policy and, if so, why?  If not, what specific changes can party members expect?
  5. Whom do you plan to help get elected to work alongside you on the executive committee of the state party?  (i.e. Who else is on your slate?)
  6. Do you plan to retain or sell HRP's costly Kapiolani headquarters and why?
  7. Presently, HRP headquarters is extremely underutilized and ill-equipped for political campaigning.  What plans do you have for maximizing HRP's effectiveness between now and November 2018?
  8. Presently, HRP's standing committees (platform, rules, finance) are virtually nonexistent, unproductive and are not meeting year-round like standing committees would.  Do you plan to let these committees remain stagnant or will you put these committees to work year-round?
  9. Who do you plan to appoint to head each of the standing committees (platform, rules, finance) and why?
  10. The platform and rules committees have been perennially manipulated by party bosses to ensure certain outcomes.  Do you agree that such manipulation has been the case in recent years?  Will you continue allowing this manipulation or will the grassroots members of the party be allowed to exert their influence on these committees?
  11. Breaking party rules has been all too common in recent years in order to accommodate the interests of certain elements within our state party.  Do you agree that such rulebreaking has been taking place?  What plans do you have to address and prevent such rulebreaking if you are elected?
  12. In the past, the precinct, district and county committees have not been provided with any real tools with which to perform their jobs.  What concrete plans and specific tools do you plan to provide precincts, districts and counties?
  13. For years, the state committees and the county committees have been emasculated by the state executive committee and, often, the state chair himself or herself.  Do you agree or disagree with this assessment and why?  How committed are you to pushing decisionmaking throughout the year back to the state committee and the counties?
  14. The Hawaii Republican Party is at an all-time low.  Now that the Hawaii GOP is in an even more distant second place to the Democrats, should party leaders (the state committee and county committee) be meeting more frequently than just quarterly for a couple of hours in between general elections?  What are your plans for a schedule of meetings to ensure that planning, coordinating and work is getting done?
  15. Do you believe that the election process for party leadership in 2017, from the scheduling and holding of precinct caucuses, the scheduling and holding of district elections, the scheduling and holding of county conventions, and the scheduling, holding and locating of the state convention has been carried out in accordance with party rules?  If not, have any violations of rules taken place?  Has existing party leadership ensured a fair, impartial, and evenhanded process in 2017?
  16. Do you hold any positions outside the party which could conflict with representing Republicans across the state as party chair?
  17. Presently, HRP does not communicate with its members very much.  What specific plans do you have to keep party members better and more regularly informed of party news and progress being made throughout the year?
  18. What concerns do you have, if any, with the financial management of the state party and/or the transparency of the executive committee with the state committee members?
  19. What are the main reasons why the Hawaii Republican Party has been in decline for the past two decades?  What specific plans do you have to maximize the potential for Republican candidates to get elected in 2018?
***** End of Questionnaire - Please reply by Friday @ 5pm *****



Please donate to HIRA Action, the official SuperPAC for the Hawaii Republican Assembly, to support HIRA's work to educate voters about failed Democrat policies and about conservative Republican solutions for Hawaii.



Your kokua will help us continue to provide a voice for conservatives.
 Donate $10, $25, or $100 today to let the establishment know we're not going away.
HAWAII REPUBLICAN ASSEMBLY (HIRA)

The Hawaii Republican Assembly (HIRA), an affiliated chapter of 
the National Federation of Republican Assemblies 
is the conservative standard-bearer of the Republican Party of Hawaii 
and the leading advocate for conservative solutions in the islands.
We are not an official arm of the Republican Party of Hawaii (RPH). 
We are the conservative base of the Republican Party. 
Please visit us at www.HawaiiRepublicanAssembly.com  
Hawaii Republican Assembly | P.O. Box 2567 | Ewa Beach, HI 96706 

Saturday, January 14, 2017

More Support for Beach Cities Republicans

More people have learned about what some leaders in RPLAC are trying to do to the Beach Cities Republicans.

Here is one comment:

What is going on here? Is Janice Webb still upset that BCR hosted the event "Hispanics for Trump"? If anyone should be called in front of the RPLAC is Janice Webb for calling your work place and asking Mr. Craig Huey to apply pressure on you to cancel the event. I have attended the BCR meeting in 2016 and I saw you and the club promoting all of our GOP candidates (Hadley, Napalitano, Dr. Wright and Omar Navarro plus Pres.-Elect Donald Trump). The fact that David Hadley lost was not your fault or the fault of your October 2016 event. His loss probably had something to do with him publishing an article in July 2016 throwing Donald Trump under the bus and alienating the conservative base. So why isn't David Hadley called on the carpet?

Two times Aurelio Matucci ran against you for president of BCR and lost. Now he is starting his own conservative club. Why do we need another conservative club. We have the Torrance-Lomita Republican Assembly (a chapter of the CRA which is a conservative group that has been around for over 80 years), South LA Inglewood Republican Assembly (chapter of the CRA). Hasn't anybody ever heard "united we stand, divided we fall"? If BCR and the other current Republican clubs had free membership for a year or two years (like the Beach Cities Impact Republicans) we would have memberships in the hundreds too. The real test is what will the memberships of these new clubs be once the free membership expires? Numerous conservative activists have asked me why we need all these GOP clubs and why we can't just have one. I don't support that idea but something has to be said about chartering all these new clubs who may only have members because Todd Blair or Aurelio are handing out free memberships. I believe what we are seeing is people who don't get their own way throwing a temper tantrum and starting their own club.



What is happening to BCR wouldn't have happened under the leadership of former LA County chairman Keith McCarthy. How do any Republican clubs know that what is being done to your club won't be done to the rest of us? The words of German Lutheran Church pastor Martin Niemoeller come to mind  "First they came for the Socialists, and I did not speak out because I was not a Socialist ... and there was no one left to speak for me." 

What we need in this state is GOP leaders like you who have a spine and take stands on issues that the lame stream media, Democrats and their RINO allies don't consider to be PC. Pres.-Elect Donald Trump has shown us the way on how we can stand up to these folks and if we follow his example we can reach Johnnie Morgan's goal of "Making California Red Again". It should be obvious to all that the reason we don't win in California anymore is because there is nothing we believe in anymore. The CA GOP has become Democrat Lite. On social/family values you can't tell the GOP from the Democrats. I always hear that California will have to hit rock bottom before it will turn around. My reply to that is "they will just get shovels with longer handles and keep on digging".


Good luck and I hope the county GOP clubs will have the back of the BCR because any of us could be next. Keep on fighting the good fight.

Thank you so much for your encouragement!

Tuesday, November 29, 2016

Conditions of Republican Leadership in California

We need new leadership in California.

The Democrats have regained their supermajority power in the state legislature. Granted, a few of them will get sick or end up in jail or on forced leave, but the Democrats rule the Sacramento roost once again.

All the networking and foot-working were not enough to overcome the Democratic machine chicanery all over California. Some assemblymembers embraced some bad views and cast bad votes. Others were simply in the wrong place at the wrong time.

Some Republican operatives want to blame Donald Trump. Honestly, though, Republicans up and down the state support Trump. What would you like to tell them? They were all wrong? And President-Elect Trump is selecting his cabinet.

And no, the answer to California and the country's problems do not lie in electing a liberal-leaning candidate like John Kasich. His policies expanded the welfare state and ensured less safety for Americans.

He wanted to grant amnesty to 11 million illegal aliens. That is a clear recipe for destruction. Open borders mean no country, no liberty, no sovereignty.

Most of the political operatives in Washington DC and California have not noticed that Trump's blunt appraisal of our nation's troubles were successful. This kind of clear-cut political incorrectness is exactly what we need.

So ...

What's the matter with California? How do we fix the vexing problems of the now-tarnished Golden State?

We need leadership with a populist heart beat. We need leadership that respects the everyday concerns of every Californian, but looks beyond the color of the skin and the endless tunnel of identity politics.



The following questions and conditions should apply to future leaders in any county:

1. Do you support or reject the full repeal of Proposition 14?

2. How do you want to engage registered Republicans on an ongoing, frequent basis?

3. How do you plan on increasing Republican registration in your country?

4. What are you views on volunteer clubs? How should by-laws be enforced? '

5. What plans or policies do you support to ensure economic growth, government integrity, and statewide security?

6. What steps will you take to invest and encourage Republican activism in blue as well as red areas of the state of California?

7. Do you have a plan to reach out to well-financed donors in California and other states to help the conservative cause?

8. What plans can you implement in county leadership to stop special interest invasions of local and statewide races?

9. Will you respect and defend the platform, or do you believe that more moderate values should determine the core principles of the Republican Party?

Any candidate for county leadership who cannot effectively answer these questions has no business running for CA GOP leadership, at the state or local level.

What do you think?


Monday, November 28, 2016

Crisis in Leadership in the CA GOP?

I noticed a nice little shout-out for me in the California Political Review Blog.

Thanks, Stephen Frank.

He reposted my comments about The War Within ...

Before I take on his comments, I want to share more good news ...

1. Darrell Issa has officially won re-election.

YES!

2. I have a great job and I am very well-paid to do what I want to do.

3. I spent a wonderful Thanksgiving with my father, his wife, and the rest of the extended family in Oregon!

4. I am in good health.

5. I am back to reading my Bible, and I sense the changes for the better already.

6. A good friend of mine gave me updates on what she is doing in Long Beach, CA.

Yes, indeed, Thanksgiving cannot be just one day--everyone of us should be encouraged to make it a lifestyle!

So, something more that makes me happy ...

Stephen Franks reprints something that I wrote on his California Political Review!



His preliminary comments are worth meditating on:

Since February, 2013, the California Republican Party has not spent a dime on voter registration—and it shows.  Since October 22, 2012 till October 24, 2016, the Party has lost over 300,000 net registered voters, though a couple of hundred thousand did, register Republican.  

I have heard nothing but complaints about the lack of registration for Republicans in California. Why is this? What is going on?

I can say that in the Beach Cities Republicans, people are re-registering.

I think that this method is doomed to fail, however.

What is going on?

We are told that under McCain-Feingold there are periods of time we can not, as a Party register voters without using “federal funds (Levin accounts).  OK, so why not register in the other times?  Why not raise Levin funds?  Instead the State Party has outsourced voter registration to an organization run by Charles Munger—unelected by Republicans at any level—HE decides where voter registrations happens.

Which organization is this? Membership is about leadership and doer-ship. Why does this habit persist, in which GOP leaders are doffing responsibilities onto other people?

How has it worked out?  A net loss of 300,000 registered Republicans.  I should add Munger also sponsored and financed Prop. 14, which ended political parties nominating candidates for office in California.  Hence no reason to be a Republican registrant.

What?!

That is unconscionable.

How can we be losing registered votes in such a dramatic fashion?

AD-66 was a terrible example of this. In 2012, the district was 36% Democrat and 33% Republican. Now it's 42% Democrat and 32% Republican. This is not success.

This pattern of failure is all wrong.

Prop 14 is bad. That proposition is a terrible idea, and needs to be scrapped or significantly altered.

There followed statements from my blog post:

“Instead of freaking out over principles, it’s time to reach out to more people.

"We need leadership, enforcement, and a no-nonsense attitude on the necessary basis for a sound government which protects the rights of all and offers special privileges to no one!

If the proper forces don’t take hold in the state of California, this will be the lingering fate of the California GOP:”

Leadership is about making clear differences and standing by them.

The goal is not to try and make nice with every segment of a population, especially those elements which vehemently oppose the political party and its principles.

Principle means nothing if it is not treated with primal importance.

Political parties have to coalesce around values. They always will. From the outset of the Republic, there were Federalists and then the anti-Federalists.

Two parties exist because of two different views on the role of the state, and the role of the citizen, of the individual within the state.

Here comes Frank's question: 


That takes leadership.  What do you think?

Yes, that takes leadership.

It will take leadership that stands for something.

That takes a personal connection with the day-to-day concerns of other people.

That means getting in bad people's faces to change things.

Fundraising is a necessity, but not dependence on one large donor, or on donors who are more interested in abandoning values and accommodating a dying culture.

Leadership. 

I hope that I have begun fitting that mold. Everyone who wants to lead must be willing to follow, as well. I believe that there are other people who demonstrate leadership skills for building up California, and building up the California Republican Party.

How can we Californian Republicans generate support for our efforts?

And who will lead this rejuvenation?



Sunday, November 13, 2016

True Leadership: RPLAC Chairman Vafiades Stood By Trump, Criticized GOP Establishment Detractors


The Daily News wrote the following after former Presidential candidate Mitt Romney ripped Donald Trump and his ascendant bid for President in March 2016:

The chairman of the Los Angeles County Republican Party watched Mitt Romney’s verbal assault on Donald Trump Thursday morning and said the former Massachusetts governor was “slapping Republicans in the face” with his attack on the current GOP delegate leader, who is seeking the presidency.

Indeed. The lack of leadership from the national conference should disturb a lot of people across the country.

“His is not the temperament of a stable, thoughtful leader,” Romney declared during his speech at the University of Utah.

But, Mark Vafiades said Romney’s attack on Trump disappointed him deeply.

“Instead of advocating for who he feels is the best nominee, he is attacking another candidate,” Vafiades said. “Trump looks poised to win the nomination and anything Romney said can be used against him by the Democrats in the general election. That is not good.”

Exactly!

Romney, who lost the 2012 presidential election to President Barack Obama by garnering only 47 percent of the popular vote, spoke for about 20 minutes - ripping Trump for his tax plan, his trade stance, his demeanor and listed off several failed business ventures started by the real estate mogul.

Mark Vafiades, RPLAC Chairman


He called him “a phony” and “a fraud” and said Trump is “playing the members of the American public for suckers.”

WHAT?!

“His imagination must not be married to real power,” Romney insisted.

He added that he would support the other Republican presidential candidates.

“Given the current delegate selection process, this means that I would vote for Marco Rubio in Florida, for John Kasich in Ohio and for Ted Cruz or whichever one of the other two contenders has the best chance of beating Mr. Trump in a given state,” Romney said.

But Vafiades said the speech could backfire by emboldening Trump supporters in key upcoming primary states to dig their heels in and support the billionaire with renewed fervor. Vafiades said Romney’s comments were “insulting” to the majority of Republicans who have been backing Trump.

Indeed, the speech did backfire. Lo and Behold, Donald Trump is our President today!

Later in the day, Trump spoke in Maine and addressed Romney’s critique by noting the former GOP presidential nominee was “begging” for his endorsement on his way to losing to Obama.

“He let us down,” Trump said, adding “Mitt is indeed a choke artist.”

Vafiades said Romney’s speech showed some in the Republican establishment were out of touch with the pulse of the party. The chairman said tearing apart other candidates only hurts the party and the individual making the attacks. He noted GOP challenger Marco Rubio was looking strong going into Super Tuesday, but then went on an all-out offensive against Trump and ended up only winning one state out of 13.

This issue of leadership as out of touch with the  party --this is is YUGE problem in Los Angeles County.

At least Vafiades has been listening.

“No one wins an election by making the campaign just against someone else,” Vafiades said. “It almost seemed like Rubio was on a suicide mission.”

Vafiades also cautioned Romney and the GOP establishment saying they shouldn’t hope for a brokered Republican National Convention in Cleveland because that will destroy the party.

There was no brokered convention. There is no broken Republican Party. On the other hand, the Democratic Party is completely in a shambles.

“Donald Trump being nominated is not the end of the party,” Vafiades said. “I think it’s a myth that there will be a brokered convention. There would be a revolt if the establishment took away the will of the voters. If you nullify what the majority of the party wants, that would be the decimation of the Republican Party.”

Yes! Power belongs in the hands of We the People in our desire to form a more perfect union built on an enumeration of powers.

He also said the speech will hurt Romney’s legacy.

“I respected Romney, but I think this hurts his credibility,” Vafiades said.


Final Reflection

Mark Vafiades stood by Trump.



He stuck to his guns about the Donald even in May, at an award function of the American Freedom Alliance.

I was a little skeptical, and locally elected officials offered their dismay about Trump, and were even angry with the Chairman for his stance.

But Trump pulled it off--and won!

True leadership--stand by your values, help your party, support your nominee.

Thank you, Chairman Vafiades!