Thursday, August 2, 2018

Will “Death of a Nation” Lead to a Rebirth of Our Nation?

The pictures and the gathering speak for themselves.

I had a wonderful time watching Dinesh D'Souza's latest documentary, "Death of a Nation."

The link between Abraham Lincoln and Donald Trump needed more attention and research, I think. 

I loved the part where D'Souza interviewed the LEFT-WING white supremacist Richard Spencer. That exchange was pretty eye-opening, and confirmed the fact that the left wing, the left-of-center movement is the racist movement.

The Democratic Party has been the party of racism since its inception.




This man later joined us in the movie theater down the street. He was a comedian willing to offer a service to the public for a buck or two.

Here's the question that I wanted to ask D'Souza:



I love this poster:





Check out Dinesh D'Souza in the theater:





After the screening, lots of us lined up to share our thoughts about the film, and why more people need to see this movie as soon as possible!

More people need to learn the truth about the Republican and Democratic Parties!




Keith Hardine of Los Angeles shared great insights about the movie and his views as a conservative Republican:



















Here are Keith's comments in full:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4OTEDemMnu0

Another member of the audience shared her views on the film (She highly recommended the movie, too)






This guy was wearing an AWESOME tie!






Check out this panel of young men declaring their commitment to Christian principles and conservative leadership.







Here are some parting videos of Dinesh D'Souza leaving the L.A. Regal Theater before the start of the movie:






Final Reflection

"Death of a Nation" was so chock-full of information, I think that the documentary suffered a little bit only because the director and narration could not dwell on everything as fully as needed. The different stories and frameworks, connecting the Democratic Party, progressive politics, Nazism, socialism, and final racism (including white supremacy) are such wide-ranging yet intimately connected topics.

D'Souza had to present the public something so that the rest of the country can start catching up with what everyone in deeper Republican circles has known about for the last five years.

I wrote a review of the film for Townhall.com (Click here).

It will be coming up on other news sites very soon, too.

Make sure that you watch this movie!


MassResistance Defeats Conversion Therapy Ban a THIRD TIME in Pro-LGBT Bay State

Here is the full report from MassResistance President Brian Camenker about MassResistance's epic victory--third year in a row--to stop the unjust, immoral, and unconstitutional conversion therapy ban legislation in Massaschusetts, one of the most pro-LGBT states in the union, and the state where homosexual marriage was first forced upon the country.

This is a big victory, and even greater because I participated in this project for the first time as the newly-appointed Organization Direct for MassResistance!

Key paragraph below:

Arthur Schaper, a veteran activist in pressuring state legislators and leader of our California MassResistance chapter, organized our Massachusetts effort. With his incredible energy, intelligence, and personal commitment he successfully directed our activists.

I feared the worst at the final hours of the formal legislative sessions--but we pulled it off!

Check out Brian's full report below:

MassResistance activists stop LGBT anti-therapy bill in Massachusetts Legislature!

Two weeks of hard, uncompromising pressure on State Senate paid off.

Despite complete cave-in by “pro-family” state Senators – and corruption by Senate leadership.

August 2, 2018

The MassResistance handout. When dealing with these legislators, you have to be very direct!

In state legislatures across the country, the well-funded national LGBT lobby has been pushing bans on therapy that would help youth deal with “sexual orientation” and “gender identity” issues. Unfortunately, they have been successful in at least 14 states. These cruel laws support a radical ideology – without care for the harm done to vulnerable children.
For the third legislative session in a row in Massachusetts the LGBT movement pushed a therapy ban bill – and again MassResistance was a major force in stopping it. This time it got farther than before: It passed the House, then ran out of steam in the Senate literally in the last few minutes of the formal legislative session (which ended July 31).


The Massachusetts State House is always a bad place to be.

No-holds-barred lobbying approach

The Massachusetts Senate is probably the most left-wing in the country, and arguably one of the most corrupt. So lobbying there was quite a challenge.

We don’t hold back. During the last two weeks of July, MassResistance activists relentlessly pounded all 38 members of the Senate with waves of phone calls, emails, and office visits. We took a very direct, no-holds-barred approach. Our handout was hand delivered to each member and also emailed to them multiple times. At the State House our activists used talking points we made for them.

Most pro-family groups take a “moderate” approach to this bill. They don’t want to offend the LGBT activists or the liberals. But that weak approach never works.

We described how homosexual and transgender behavior in children is often a result of early trauma such as molestation or rape, exposure to pornography, or psychological issues with a parent. Victimized youth can become suicidal if they don’t get help. Skilled professionals can help them work out these issues. We described people we know whose lives were saved by reparative therapy. But the radical LGBT activists want to ban this, because it would counter their ideology that they are “born that way.”

Thus, by passing this bill, they are helping harm or even kill children in order support a special interest.

We also informed the Senators that this bill is unconstitutional. On June 26, 2018, the US Supreme Court ruled in NIFLA v Becerra that the government cannot create a “professional speech” category lacking First Amendment protections. Of course, liberals don’t care about constitutionality, but we pushed this argument anyway.

In the last few days of the session, we intensified our efforts. In particular, we targeted the Senate leadership and the Rules Committee – where they had parked the bill until the afternoon of the last day of the session.

Big pressure by the LGBT movement


The LGBT movement pushed hard to get this bill passed. Their main strategy was to spread blatant lies and misinformation about this therapy – which we countered in our handout. And as usual, they brought together a “Coalition to Ban Conversion Therapy in Massachusetts” with dozens of Massachusetts left-wing groups.

Here's an example of the LGBT propaganda push:

They were very serious about organizing. At “Boston Gay Pride” week in June they were passing out literature to inflame support for the bill and had numerous people recruiting volunteers.

At the "Boston Gay Pride Festival" in June, they were organizing and passing out flyers to inflame support for the bill.

Out-lobbying the opposition!


But for some reason, we still out-lobbied them in the last two weeks of the session. And in the end, the Senate leadership clearly got message that there was a lot of anger about this bill. They pushed it off until the very last few minutes of the formal session, when there was no time to effectively pass it and get to the Governor’s desk.

But it would have been easier to stop this bill if things had gone differently in the earlier stages.

Timeline of events


In January 2017, at the beginning of the 2-year session, the LGBT movement filed identical bills in the House (H1190) and the Senate (S62). This is a common strategy. They see which one moves forward and then ride with it. (When we refer to “the bill” in the singular, we mean the current version of the bill being acted upon.)

A public hearing was held on June 6, 2017. Similar to the public hearing on their anti-therapy bill filed in 2015, the usual crowd of far-left and LGBT activists were brought in to “testify.” (See our short but powerful VIDEO from the 2015 public hearing!)
Other pro-family groups in Massachusetts announced that they were taking the lead in fighting the bill this time. So MassResistance backed off and focused our efforts in other areas. They took a more “moderate” non-confrontational approach, and did not want to offend liberal legislators.

On June 27, 2018, the bill came to the House floor. Conservative House members were able to persuade the leadership to take out a particularly egregious section of the bill, which would make such therapy considered child abuse under the law and force “mandated reporters” to report any case if they found out about it. The pro-family people considered this a “victory.” But the other terrible parts stayed intact. The changes to Bill 1190 were re-issued as Bill H4664.

The House then voted and passed H4664 by 117-34. Shockingly, if you look on the roll call sheet, you will see that a majority of the Republicans voted “yes” on this horrible legislation, including Geoff Diehl, Shaunna O’Connell, Todd Smola, and Brad Hill.

It was a disaster. In the past, it never even got to the House floor. Obviously the “pro-family” lobbying was not working. So MassResistance decided to get involved.

Bill H4664 was then sent Senate, which put it in the Senate Rules Committee. As described above, starting on July 13 MassResistance began its full-court press on both the Rules Committee and the entire Senate.

Arthur Schaper, a veteran activist in pressuring state legislators and leader of our California MassResistance chapter, organized our Massachusetts effort. With his incredible energy, intelligence, and personal commitment he successfully directed our activists.

The sleaze on the final day – July 31


(The detail here is a bit tedious, but very interesting.)

On the last day of the session, July 31, the Senate and House were both in marathon sessions to finish their business before the midnight deadline. At 1:00 pm in the afternoon, the Rules Committee told us the bill was still there.

Somehow that afternoon, the bill got voted out of the Rules Committee. (We suspect there was no actual Rules Committee vote, since they have not been able to give us a roll call.)
But as the evening progressed toward midnight, the leadership still didn’t bring up the bill for the final vote. We thought we had made it!

Then at 11:57 pm the GOP (!) Minority Leader, Bruce Tarr, made a motion to extend the session until 12:15 a.m! They took a short recess and came back at 12:01. The chairman, Senate President Karen Spilka, immediately brought up Bill H4664. But the horrible section that the House had taken out was added back in, and the result was named S2641.
Normally, the final vote for Bill S2641 would need to be voted on a different day. The chairman asked if there was any objection for the rules be suspended so they could vote on it now. No one objected, not even the Republicans!

Debate commenced. The bill’s sponsor, Rules Committee Chairman Mark Montigny, gave a rambling, angry, rather incoherent speech quoting Peter Sprigg of the Family Research Council about homosexuality! It had nothing to do with the bill, but was meant to demean conservatives.

Unfortunately, all of the so-called “pro-family” Senators completely caved in. Not a single one spoke against the bill. There was no more debate. The Senate President then did a fast voice vote with no discernable yeas or nays and declared the bill passed. No Republican called for a roll call vote (which they easily could have done). Minutes later, the session ended.

A non-victory for the liberals


But it was not a victory. The House and Senate had passed two different bills. The House had already adjourned. There was no time to send it back for a vote there, or send it to a conference committee.

Had they done all this a few days before, or a week before, it would have been possible. But for some reason – we think it had a lot to do with the MassResistance pressure they were getting from the public – they chose not to do that.

What’s next?


We still have to be on top of this. Although the LGBT activists have admitted defeat in the press, there are some sleazy and even illegal tactics that are often used to slither legislation through after the formal session ends.

For example, between now and the end of 2018 there are twice-weekly “informal” sessions of the House and Senate where as little as 2 members (at least one Democrat and one Republican) vote on so-called “non-controversial” matters. They could try to push it through one of those. But just one member can stop the process. We will be watching closely.

Lessons learned? Basically, combatting the LGBT movement requires hardball tactics. These people are obsessed and don’t care about your children or anything else. Conservatives need to step up their game or be rolled over.

For the time being, however, MassResistance can claim a substantial victory against the LGBT lobby in one of the most LGBT-friendly states in the country!

BREAKING: Obnoxious Open Borders Victorville Councilwoman Arrested in Hesperia City Hall

Wow!

The good news just keeps rolling for us conservatives.

For the last two years, Trump supporters and illegal immigration opponents have been going after open-border and Brown Supremacist bigot Blanca Gomez.



Sadly, she somehow managed to get elected to the Victorville City Council.

Her aggressive, left-wing agenda should have been apparent to anyone paying attention. She played like a sleeper candidate into the San Bernardino County community, which was hard-hit by the Great Recession in 2008 and afterwards.

She has turned into a manifold embarrassment, routinely fighting with her elder colleagues on the city council. She even took the seat from the mayor during closed session.

She was a keynote speaker at the Brown Supremacist summit at UC Riverside in April, 2017.

She was talking about the perverse, inordinate steps to make the Victorville City Hall and Council as a whole more responsive to "immigrants" than to the concerns of California's citizenry.

That's a real problem. This is a racist agenda. She has been a destructive force for bad, not for good in her city, too. When Victorville was discussing whether to opt out of SB 54, she brought in many of her pro-illegal protesters and goons to turn the city council chambers into a circus.

Now she has further sullied herself and the reputation of the city council by getting arrested at Hesperia City Hall!

               
HESPERIA — Victorville Councilwoman Blanca Gomez was arrested on suspicion of resisting arrest and trespassing at Hesperia City Hall on Thursday morning, according to booking records.

She never respected borders before.

Why should we be surprised that she got arrested for not respecting the boundaries of another city's main building?



Gomez, 39, was taken away in handcuffs by a San Bernardino County Sheriff’s Department deputy after an incident involving staff, Hesperia spokeswoman Rachel Molina said.

She couldn't bother to respect other people? She couldn't bother to follow the rules of another city council. What a shame.

The elected official was arrested at 9:49 a.m., cited and released, according to booking records. Both alleged crimes are misdemeanors.

People need to go to her court hearing and follow what happens to her.

In a Facebook Live video posted by Gomez, she can be seen typing on a laptop when Hesperia City Manager Nils Bentsen and a Sheriff’s deputy enter the room.

She set this up, no doubt. Was she trying to play the race card against the Hesperia law enforcement on site?

The video shows an exchange between the deputy and Gomez, which appeared to escalate after Gomez refused to answer questions from the law enforcement official and instead repeatedly demurred with, “Am I being arrested?”

“Ma’am, I need you to answer my question,” the deputy asked at one point. “If you don’t answer my question, then I’m going to have to take action.”

Gomez was at City Hall helping Hesperia Council candidates Gonzalo Gurrola and Robert Lucero file paperwork for the November election when she was arrested, Gurrola told the Daily Press.

What was she doing there? Why can't she mind her own business and take care of the concerns of Victorville residents? She is a true embarrassment to that city, enough that even the liberal press cannot ignore citing and reporting on her lawlessness.



Molina would not elaborate on the incident, but Gurrola said Gomez should not have been arrested, yet remarked that the Councilwoman “kept talking over” city staff and the Sheriff’s deputy.

She was a disorderly presence in the city hall. She refused to cooperate with the directions of the peace officer on site. Why was she typing in the room to begin with?

“No one has the right to interrupt business being conducted at city hall,” Councilman Paul Russ told the Daily Press.

BAM!

Gurrola and Lucero are candidates for District 2, which also includes current Mayor Bill Holland, Larry Nava and Dan Ramirez.

Gomez “urged” and “suggested” Gurrola and Lucero run for a Council seat, Gurrola said.

She wants to push the La Raza, Brown supremacy agenda throughout San Bernardino County.

She should resign her office in Victorville right away. Her disruptive behavior during those city council meetings has so frustrated city staffers, that the city manager quit and joined with Apple Valley.

“I’m saddened that a fellow Council member and elected official, who does not live in Hesperia, would come to City Hall and create a hostile situation for the hard working staff,” said Mayor Bill Holland. “It’s evident by the Facebook video that she came with the intention of causing a disturbance and creating a publicity stunt.”

Yes, and she needs to pay for it.

The mayor added that Gomez’s endorsement of any candidate could be a “preview of coming attractions” by the candidate should they be elected.

Exactly!

“Council member Gomez was not acting in any official capacity via the city nor was she there on any business with the authority of the Victorville City Council,” city spokeswoman Sue Jones said, adding the city would not be immediately commenting further.



Please contact the Victorville City Council right away and tell them Blanca Gomez should be stripped for her standing, her duties, and that she should resign NOW!






New York Times So Woke: Hires Racist Anti-White Reporter for Editorial Board

Let's just say that Sarah Jeoung, the latest hire to the New York Times, has a racist past.

Garbage Human, a parody account on Twitter, shared the following:


Her Twitter feed is lined with such hate:


And it wasn't an isolated tweet.

Check out the other hate below:








The above tweet came on the heels of this tweet:


Michael Brown is the "gentle giant", right?

Wrong. The police reports, the grand jury testimony from the Ferguson, Missouri shooting all established that Brown was a thug who had robbed a convenience store, then rushed at a police officer, who had every right to shoot him to defend himself.

This woman is a full-on illicit hack. How can the New York Times consider this person. Putting aside her record of racist rhetoric, the fact that she ran with such a blatant lie, that only should have disqualified her from any high-profile journalism career.

Of course, we are talking about the New York Times, where they print "All the News that Fits Their Narrative."

Instead of reassessing their decision to hire this hateful ... (fill in blank here), the New York Times issued a very tired, unbelievable press release to cover their a..actions:


August 2, 2018
Statement from The New York Times

We hired Sarah Jeong because of the exceptional work she has done covering the internet and technology at a range of respected publications.

Her journalism and the fact that she is a young Asian woman have made her a subject of frequent online harassment. For a period of time she responded to that harassment by imitating the rhetoric of her harassers. She sees now that this approach only served to feed the vitriol that we too often see on social media. She regrets it, and The Times does not condone it.

Really? Jeong issued her tweets on their own, not in response or in parody to online attacks which she had endured.

She wants to play victim, all the while victimizing white people.

We had candid conversations with Sarah as part of our thorough vetting process, which included a review of her social media history. She understands that this type of rhetoric is not acceptable at The Times and we are confident that she will be an important voice for the editorial board moving forward. 

The New York Times claimed that they had "candid conversations" with their new star editor. They probably should have written "canned," since no one takes the corrupt New York Times seriously.

As expected, Jeong spliced out private messages directed at her and played victim:

As a woman of color on the internet, I have faced torrents of online hate, often along this vein:
I engaged in what I thought of at the time of counter-trolling. While it was intended as satire, I deeply regret that I mimicked the language of my harassers. These comments were not aimed at a general audience, because general audiences do not engage in harassment campaigns. I can understand how hurtful these posts are out of context, and would not do it again.
These comments were responses to her hate.

They are vile.

But she can't argue that she was merely "responding."



Furthermore, her anti-white racist comments were directed at all white people. She could have targeted her smarmy retorts at those individuals and left it at that.

On top of that, she demonstrated a disturbing lack of maturity in her social media profile four years ago, and continued to do so. Such a lack of judgment should give any publishing house pause.

Poetic Justice: Leader of International Pro-Illegal Lobby Detained by ICE in Wisconsin

These breaking news posts pretty much write themselves.

Nothing could be more welcome and worth reading that to see the open border activists who push for ruining this country--getting detained by ICE.

We have illegal aliens in the United States, and they are actively lobbying our government to get rid of the enforcement of our borders and allow illegal aliens to enter this country. They are foreign nationals! They should be rounded up forthwith and deported immediately!

And it looks like one of the ringleaders from LULAC is about to be deported, too!


"An Injustice Against Anyone is an Injustice Everywhere"

I hate it when illegal alien activists quote Dr. Martin Luther King Jr. to promote illegal aliens. Dr. King was a staunch opponent of illegal immigration. Click here for more information.

Dear LULAC Members,



Ricardo Fierro, a LULAC Council President, has been detained by Immigration and Customs Enforcement officials since July 24th from his home in Racine, Wisconsin. Ricardo has been separated from his family and 5 children who are afraid he will soon be deported.

Ricardo was brought to the United States as a minor more than 20 years ago. After graduating from J.I. Case High School he started a family and career and developing a reputation an entrepreneur in the community.

He should have been deported a long time ago. It's the fault of previous administrations, particularly the Obama Administration, for not enforcing our nation's immigration laws.

LULAC is calling for the immediate release of Ricardo Fierro so he can be reunited with his family and 5 children. He is a dedicated father, community leader, and LULAC Council President. LULAC will fight to protect the rights of each and every member.

They can be reunited with Fierro in his home country, and it's not the United States. There is nothing preventing him from staying with his family.

For my part, I would like to know why the press, the academic world, the politicians, and these activists don't focus on the American families which have been separated forever from each other. Angel Moms and Angel Dads will never see their children again because of illegal aliens.

His arrest has caused outrage in the Racine community from prominent elected officials, faith based organizations, and immigrant rights organizations who are working together to seek his immediate release so he can be reunited with his family and children.

And where's the outrage over the violations of the rule of law? Where is outrage for the millions of American workers whose jobs, livelihood, and quality of life have been marred because of unfettered immigration, legal and illegal.

Here are just a few of the statements from prominent elected officials in the community:

“Ricardo has chased the American Dream, building a life for himself and his family in Racine while others often chose to leave,” State Rep. Greta Neubauer said. “He is a devoted father and he has proven himself to be a hard worker. Ricardo gives back more than he receives from our community, whether it is through his work or as a longtime community advocate with the Racine Interfaith Coalition … Ricardo has gone to great lengths to be a law-abiding, contributing member of the community he loves.”


Greta Neubauer is a left-wing hack representing Racine, a left-wing sinkhole in the midst of red state Wisconsin. We should not be surprised that another Democratic politician wants to do everything possible to bring in more illegal aliens so that they get amnesty and continue voting Democratic, since they can't win on anything else.

“I can attest to his character, his work ethic, and his efforts to work for citizenship for many years,” Racine Mayor Cory Mason wrote. “Although he may be undocumented, I consider him a model resident of Racine and wish there were hundreds more like him. Racine would be a better city as a result.” Ricardo worked with Mayor John Dickert in an advisory role on issues related to immigration.

The mayor Racine was in the state assembly, and was replaced by Neubauer (listed above). The coven of left-wing corruption knows no bounds. The Democratic Party is invested in the credo "You work, and I eat."

“There are few people more dedicated to the Racine community than Ricardo Fierro,” Racine Interfaith Coalition co-president Linda Boyle said in a statement. “As the father of five children of U.S. citizenship, responsible son and brother, Ricardo’s detention has presented an unimaginable hardship to his family and loved ones.”

Really? They are praising an illegal alien as one who loves the United States more than American citizens in Racine?

The Fierro family has received more than 50 letters of support and said that shows his value and importance to our community.

50 letters of support? That's it? Does not sound very impressive. Fierro should not be receiving support. He should be receiving "Deport".

As a LULAC Council President, dedicated father, community leader, and member of the church, Ricardo's arrest has raised the alarm in the Racine, Wisconsin community for all immigrant families. As an outstanding member of the LULAC family we are concerned about his welfare and that of his family. Deporting Ricard Fierro would have a devastating impact on his family and children as the primary head of household.

Fake news. "Immigrant" means that the individual entered this country legally. Fierro did not come into this country through legal means, and it's not the fault of the American citizens in this country that Fierro's parents broke the law.

Final Reflection

This both a welcome and supreme irony. LULAC has been pushing this globalist, nonsensical idea for decades. Where does one get this idea that every person in Latin America becomes an automatic citizen of any country within the two continents?

I can't wait to see these open-border, illegal alien activists deported from this country. This is treachery on an unprecedented scale which cannot be tolerated.

Contact the mayor of Racine, Wisconsin, and tell him to focus on Americans, not illegal aliens.




















Mayor Cory Mason
(262) 636-9111
mayor@cityofracine.org











Contact State Rep. Greta Neubauer, too:


Madison Office:Room 6 North
State Capitol
PO Box 8953
Madison, WI 53708
Telephone:(608) 266-0634
(888) 534-0066
Fax:(608) 282-3666Voting Address:936 Main St. Apt. 3
Racine, WI 53403

Wednesday, August 1, 2018

BREAKING: Conversion Therapy Ban Bill Fails in Massachusetts Legislative Session

The 190th Session of the Massachusetts State Legislature once again tried to rush every perverse piece of legislation through at the last minute. Most blue state legislative bodies are dysfunctional in this manner, unable to get to the most important, the most pertinent bills, while going after inane issues and pushing political talking points during campaign season for the next three months.



Among the good news for pro-family advocates, the Beacon Hill politicos could not muscle through a ban on conversion therapy for minors, despite their best efforts.

From the New Boston Post:

A bill that would have prohibited therapists from trying to change the sexual orientation or gender identity of a minor has failed in the Massachusetts Legislature, even though both the House and Senate expressed support for it.


An amendment added to the bill in the state House of Representatives five weeks ago proved the bill’s undoing, as the Senate failed to pass a reconciled version in time to meet all the technical formalities needed before the two chambers wrapped up their formal sessions in the wee hours of Wednesday, August 1.

How about that?

What happened specifically?

[W]hile the Senate “engrossed” the bill, the vote didn’t allow time for the bill to be “enacted,” a process that requires printing a bill on parchment and then having that version voted on again for “enactment” by the House and Senate. Those final steps didn’t happen before both branches adjourned (which happened at 1:12 a.m. Wednesday in the House, and at or shortly after 1:16 a.m. in the Senate, according to State House News Service).



MassResistance activists all over the country, especially in Massachusetts, made numerous phone calls, wrote in many emails, and even made personal visits to Beacon Hill to oppose this travesty.

Those efforts paid off, so much so that the state legislature attempted to shove this legislation through at the last minute in the dead of midnight so that no one would know or raise a fuss about its passage. Yet by cutting the votes on this legislation so close, the state senate botched up the legal process, and the legislature could not muscle through the final version which both houses could agree upon.

This failure of the anti-family LGBT movement proves once again that when pro-family forces work hard and push against bad legislation, they can win--many times in the most unlikely of ways.

In an interview on Boston Public Radio, State Senate President Spilka didn't even mention their failure to pass the conversion therapy ban, most likely fearing the wrath of the vile LGBT movement, which has inordinate power in the Commonwealth.

Here's the glorious graphic, exposing the epic failure of the state senate--and a major victory for Pro-Family Movement!

Conversion Therapy failed AGAIN!
Great work, MassResistance!

Conversion therapy is a serious, reputable practice which has saved countless lives, young and old. The true abuse would be to take away this choice from parents, families, and communities which want the best for young people.

The fact that this bill went down to defeat a record third time is growing evidence that aggressive pro-family efforts from MassResistance really do make the difference. Add to his setback for the abusive LGBT Hate Machine the report that the Governor of Maine vetoed the same legislation last month, and the Maine legislature could not override his veto, and then the burgeoning restoration of professional free speech before the Supreme Court of the United States in its recent rulings.

The New Boston Post adds:


Yet it’s unclear what would happen if a conversion therapy ban passes next session, because U.S. Supreme Court Justice Clarence Thomas seemed to invite a challenge to such laws during a recent majority opinion in an unrelated case. Thomas noted that the federal Supreme Court has never made a distinction between speech by professionals and speech by others when it comes to determining First Amendment protection.



“Professionals might have a host of good-faith disagreements, both with each other and with the government, on many topics in their respective fields … and the people lose when the government is the one deciding which ideas should prevail,” Thomas wrote in the 5-4 decision, in a case called National Institute of Family and Life Advocates v. Becerra, which was decided June 26.

Opponents of banning conversion therapy say the U.S. Supreme Court may eventually overturn state laws such as the one proposed in Massachusetts.

The tide is turning for life, family, marriage, and Biblical morality at an unprecedented pace.

This latest victory should embolden pro-family advocates in their fight to protect natural marriage and family, even in the bluest, most Democratic, darkest states in the union.

A full report from MassResistance will be published soon. Stay tuned!