Will “Death of a Nation” Lead to a Rebirth of Our Nation?

The pictures and the gathering speak for themselves.

I had a wonderful time watching Dinesh D'Souza's latest documentary, "Death of a Nation."

The link between Abraham Lincoln and Donald Trump needed more attention and research, I think. 

I loved the part where D'Souza interviewed the LEFT-WING white supremacist Richard Spencer. That exchange was pretty eye-opening, and confirmed the fact that the left wing, the left-of-center movement is the racist movement.

The Democratic Party has been the party of racism since its inception.

This man later joined us in the movie theater down the street. He was a comedian willing to offer a service to the public for a buck or two.

Here's the question that I wanted to ask D'Souza:

I love this poster:

Check out Dinesh D'Souza in the theater:

After the screening, lots of us lined up to share our thoughts about the film, and why more people need to see this movie as soon as possible!

More people need to learn the truth about the Republican and Democratic Parties!

Keith Hardine of Los Angeles shared great insights about the movie and his views as a conservative Republican:

Here are Keith's comments in full:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4OTEDemMnu0

Another member of the audience shared her views on the film (She highly recommended the movie, too)

This guy was wearing an AWESOME tie!

Check out this panel of young men declaring their commitment to Christian principles and conservative leadership.

Here are some parting videos of Dinesh D'Souza leaving the L.A. Regal Theater before the start of the movie:

Final Reflection

"Death of a Nation" was so chock-full of information, I think that the documentary suffered a little bit only because the director and narration could not dwell on everything as fully as needed. The different stories and frameworks, connecting the Democratic Party, progressive politics, Nazism, socialism, and final racism (including white supremacy) are such wide-ranging yet intimately connected topics.

D'Souza had to present the public something so that the rest of the country can start catching up with what everyone in deeper Republican circles has known about for the last five years.

I wrote a review of the film for Townhall.com (Click here).

It will be coming up on other news sites very soon, too.

Make sure that you watch this movie!

Pardon Me, President Trump, You Forgot to Pardon Dinesh D’Souza (Full Article)

Presidential pardons have fallen under renewed scrutiny. Critics contend that President Trump is helping friends and fellow conservatives. He pardoned Sheriff Joe Arpaio following his conviction at the hand of a liberal federal judge. Trump also pardoned Kristian Saucier, who was convicted of federal crimes for taking photos in a submarine. The public reads heavy condemnation about these pardons because of the deranged anti-Trump media, still unable to get over the fact that Hillary Clinton isn’t queen. They merely want to justify their unjustifiable hatred of this President. Trump should issue a blanket pardon for press agents like Jim Acosta, Rachel Maddow, and their illiberal ilk. They have engaged in massive corporate fraud and deception for decades. But for their progressive propaganda promoting Barack Obama, communist dictators, and left-wing talking points, this country would not have faced the mess that Trump has had to take on for the last two years, often single-handedly.

Trump’s latest pardon to invite press/establishment calumny features Irving Lewis “Scooter” Libby, the former chief of staff for Vice President Dick Cheney and then assistant to President George W. Bush. Libby’s nefarious crimes? Obstruction of justice, perjury, giving false statement, and much of a result of overzealous prosecution, all of it connected to leaks over former CIA Agent Valerie Plame. In light of the decrepit character of executive institutions today, the Deep State two-step of these federal agencies should have raised major alarms a decade ago. Live and learn, I guess.

Shortly after Libby’s conviction, President George W. Bush merely commuted part of Scooter Libby’s sentence, probably fearing backlash from the liberal media. Nevertheless, the chattering classes went clickety-clackety crazy. Fareed Zakaria (the same pseudo-journalist with plagiarism issues) decried the President’s pardoning power as outlined in the United States Constitution. He suggested on “This Week with George Step-on-all-of-us” that Congress and then the country should remove this power.

According to historical sources on this contentious Presidential power, Founding Father Alexander Hamilton had argued for this provision, and the Constitution convention added it to the final charter, in order to secure the peace and freedom of competing combatants. Domestic insurrections were a looming concern, and the best way to ensure peace was to permit pardons for warring factions. Fair enough. To err is human, to forgive is divine, right?

The Framers were prescient beyond their years. Toward the end of the Civil War, President Lincoln intended to issue full pardons to every Confederate soldier who would repledge allegiance to the United States. “What is the best way to defeat an enemy? Make him your friend.” His successor, Democrat Andrew Jackson, issued a blanket pardon on Christmas Day 1868, despite (or perhaps because of) the animus between Executive Branch and the “Radical” Republican Congress. Such measures helped shore up sore feelings throughout the country. A century later, President Gerald Ford smoothed away a constitutional crisis by issuing a pardon for President Richard Nixon. George W. Bush also pardoned Bill Clinton, which offered a just outcome. There was no way a D.C. ultra-Democratic jury would have convicted Bubba for his perjury to a grand jury.

Presidential pardons should remain an option for many compelling reasons. No doubt, domestic insurrections are a thing once again (see California and the other deep blue dictatorships along the West Coast). Besides, a country cannot remain peacefully established on vengeance and political gamesmanship at every level, with every passing administration. Even the ancient Athenians enacted a blanket amnesty following the most destructive civil war in the city state’s (and perhaps world’s) history.

Pardons can also combat new, growing problems: Deep State corruption, overzealous prosecution, and judicial activism. In the case of Sheriff Joe, the court order was unconstitutional. In his trial, he was not permitted a jury! Someone tell me how any of that is legal. Judicial tyranny is a threat to our Republic, and presidential pardons are essential to chipping away at the dictatorship of the bench. As for overzealous prosecution … Mueller and company are on a witch hunt, wasting millions to look for crimes. Trump pardoned Libby to signal how he will scuttle prosecutorial abuses.

But One criminal case comes to mind for which Trump needs to issue a pardon: Dinesh D’Souza. The case may have faded from public memory, so here’s a brief recap. He was arraigned in a Manhattan federal court for a $20,000 campaign violation, exceeding arbitrary limits. He asked a friend to donate to a friend since he had reached his limit, then D’Souza paid back her friend. This case highlights how criminal law has lots its bearings and basis in mens rea, or criminal intent. People are going to jail for breaking laws they know nothing about! On top of that, this case showcased the aggressive, selective enforcement of the Obama Administration and his coven of left-wing US attorneys. Other people had skirted campaign finance laws and spent more money doing so but got a slap on the wrist.

D’Souza was prosecuted, convicted of a felony. His otherwise liberal attorney was flabbergasted at the outrageous conduct of the federal court and judge. There was no reason for D’Souza to be sent up the river like that. None. The evidence suggests it was political prosecution at its worst from Obama. Congressional investigations discovered a file with his name on it and a special direction to go after him. These developments have confirmed that the FBI was particularly targeting D’Souza.

This Deep State persecution must be confronted, condemned, and closed down. I can’t think of a better way to do this than for President Trump to pardon Dinesh D’Souza. President Trump should not hold back from issuing a full pardon for D’Souza. His “crime” was skirting campaign finance laws, which really are bad laws to begin with. Former US Senator and Presidential candidate John Edwards (a corrupt and despicable US Senator if there ever was one) faced unconscionable indictments for purported campaign finance crimes, but was acquitted.

Pardon me, Mr. Trump—but you need to pardon Dinesh D’Souza ASAP!