Showing posts with label progressivism. Show all posts
Showing posts with label progressivism. Show all posts

Saturday, September 2, 2017

Best Quote/Photo Caption from Berkeley: "Nazis and KKK are Left-Wing Groups"

It still amazes me that a reported on the ground reported my statements about the KKK, Antifa, and the Nazis.



Here's the tweet, which raised such a stir on social media, but also helped the Trump movement and conservatism in general to take back the narrative for the truth:

Yes, they were.

They were progressives because of their frequent resort to force in order to impose their view of government, of the culture which they wanted to flourish in their states.

The Progressive movement has been dedicated to ensuring an imposed, rigid, government-defined hierarchy since its inception.



German views on the role of the individual within the state took a totalitarian turn in the early 1800's, especially following the state-sponsored tyranny of the French Revolution. Georg Wilhelm Friedrich Hegel imagined the role and relevance of the individual citizen completely in line with the government, or with the state. This progressive nonsense drew much of its inspiration from the hedonist Rousseau and his argument about the General Will for political power.

In effect, these arguments about one final authority making the decisions for all mankind within a government are tantamount to advocating for dictatorship, the rule of one strong man and his will over the interests or will of individual citizens.

The Framers never wanted such tyranny to hold sway in the United States of America. They were in fact wise, Biblically-minded men who understood that human nature is corrupted, and that power corrupts, especially when concentrated in the hands of many or few.

Progressives are dedicated to this perverse notion that human beings are basically good, that the proper environment and training will make people better people. This line of thinking fails to recognize that men and women are limited in their means and  their minds, that they will frequently seek what is best for themselves when challenges arise to themselves as well as to the state or the government they run.



Human history is replete with examples of men who intend to do good, but get sucked in by bad motives and bad people. The flesh of man, the sinful nature of man is strong and cannot be overcome by man's efforts or hopes. It takes the grace of God, the secure blessings of liberty. Consider that the Declaration of Independence mentions God five times, outlining that our rights come from Him, and not from ourselves.

So, progressives are dedicated to this strange notion that human beings are perfectible, that human nature is malleable and can be changed. This argument coincides very well with the agenda pushed by Antifa, Nazis, and the KKK, to create a perfect world, a perfect race--and to remove anyone and anything which adulterates the pure race, the ideal population which they wish to create.



Indeed, these three groups mentioned are Left-wing:

1.They rely on violence.
2.They believe that people can be perfect, or that they are basically good
3. They discriminate against people based on the color of their skin
4. They want to create a "perfect" society, which involves getting rid of "undesirables" and making people believe what they believe--or else.

Yes, and I am so glad that liberal mainstream affiliates reported my statement--and it's time for us to assert the truth about political history and ideologies. The Left, the Democratic Party, and their domestic terrorist wings have pushed violence and repression, while free market advocates and right-wing activists have sought liberty and respect for God's natural order.


Friday, June 30, 2017

Progressives Want to Kill the Democratic Party for Good: That's GREAT!

The Big Government, socialist, wannabe progressives are absolutely furious.

They expected Barack Obama to usher in all the final hopes to ensure that the United States would turn into a socialist republic, in which a couple of well-connected experts would take over and then slowly give everything to everyone, ensuring that everyone is fully and forever equal.

Not only did none of this ever happen, but the most radical of progressives complained, calling Obama the most Republican president ever elected by the Democratic Party.

What a wash. What a brazen disappointment.


The failure of Democratic candidate Jon Ossoff to capture the vacant House seat left in a suburban Atlanta district by the Trump nomination of Republican Rep. Tom Price as Secretary of Health and Human Services shows the disastrous state of the Democratic Party.

I could not agree more. Reality is not progressive, as Lindorff would have hoped.

Life is very much fallen and fallible. Conservative principles stop trying to ignore or change the laws of nature and the facts of life. Conservatives recognize these limitations and make the most of overcoming them through effort and investment.

So beholden is that party to corporate interests that it cannot put up or support any candidate who is willing to challenge its neo-liberal paradigm. The 30-year-old Ossoff tried to win by appealing to the so called "moderate middle" of voters, offering vague promises of economic growth and challenges to President Trump's policies -- for example his attack on the Obama administration's so-called Affordable Care Act. 

The only what that a candidate reaching out to middle-income voters in suburban Atlanta was to appeal to those middle-income realities. The Progressives are all a bunch of wealthy elitists or welfare queens.

Nothing more. Most of them have been taught to see themselves as victims and demand that someone pay for the injustice which they have so unjustly suffered.
It was a stupid campaign approach, especially for a special election, when voter turnouts are typically very low and voter enthusiasm is the key. No matter: despite polls showing overwhelming American support for a Canadian-style single-payer "Medicare for All" health care system, Ossoff did not call for such a change. Nor did he mention at all the need to slash US military spending -- the single biggest reason, because it lays claim to some 54% of all federal tax dollars each year, why the US is approaching Third World status by most measures such as life-expectancy, infant mortality, infrastructure, education, etc.

All of this a bunch of garbage.

There is no way that the military expenditures consume 54% of the budget.

No way. It;s the entitlement spending that is eating our country into bankruptcy.

The question now for progressives is: What is to be done?

Clearly to be a viable and genuine opposition party to the ruling Republicans, the Democratic Party would have to be thoroughly deconstructed and rebuilt. The millionaire-packed Democratic National Committee leadership -- the lobbyists, the elected officials and the well-heeled donors -- would have to be tossed out entirely, and replaced by genuine progressives, labor activists, environmentalists, representatives of various minority groups and (gasp!) socialists. 

You heard it from the progressive right in this post.

They want to create a "socialist paradise" in the United States.

He should see how that's working out in Venezuela and Cuba.

This is essentially what Jeremy Corbyn and his supporters in the British Labour Party have done, but I have hard time, particularly after watching the overt and underhanded subversion of the Bernie Sanders primary campaign last year, and the inability of progressive Democrats to challenge and replace an the ossified and thoroughly discredited party leadership, imagining that this can happen here in the US with the Democratic Party, which internally is clearly anything but democratic. 




I do agree that the Democratic Party is the every antithesis to democracy. They are undermining their own party rules and cheating the grassroots out of fair representation. They have no interest in listening to the will of the individual members, probably because they realize that the progressive fantasies are completely unworkable in this place called "The Real World."

Funny but true. Progressivism is just radical backward insanity.

Please, adults who call themselves progressives--it's time to grow up.

Of course, this fight is not going to stop

* A Medicare for All health care system modeled on what they have in Canada

* An end to US militarism abroad and at home, the closing of most if not all foreign bases, an end to all US wars and arms sales to conflict zones, and a reduction in the US military budget by 50%. As well, a call for the US to return to negotiations with all nuclear nations to eliminate these weapons of mass destruction.

* A fair, non-racist immigration policy that is generous in accepting political refugees, that doesn't threaten with deportation those young people brought illegally into the US not by their own choice, that, while securing borders to prevent illegal crossings, is humane and follows constitutional norms in dealing with those who sneak into the country seeking work, and that, finally, recognizes and works to end the role that US economic and foreign policy plays in creating economic problems in neighboring countries that compel people to try and enter the US seeking work.

The point is that the progressives want AMNESTY.

My answer is NO! And many Democrats are in agreement. No sanctuary state or city policies. Everyone has to abide by the laws of this country and come in legally.

* A crash program to reduce US carbon emissions, and to help other countries do so, particularly those developing countries that have limited resources and that are being most impacted already by global warming.

Such a crash program will crash the economy. Just say no.

* A program to shift funding for education away from its current reliance on local property taxes to federal funding on a per-student basis in order to equalize access to good public schools -- an approach taken by most European countries -- and a program of free college education to all who qualify for admission at public institutions of higher education.

Expand the education bureaucracy? I thought that these progressives wanted to get rid of the corporate interests and stop allowing the rich to pull all the strings.

* A jobs program modeled on the New Deal's Works Progress Administration, to create jobs for the jobless in needed areas like infrastructure repair, parks maintenance, environmental clean-up, school safety monitoring and the like.

Been there. Done that. These socialists are living in the past. Don't they have any new, fresh ideas for how to make this country strong and thriving?

* A living federal minimum wage.

What is "living"? $15 an hour? Why not $1,000 an hour?!

Everyone--just look at Seattle, Washington, and you will see how all this talk about raising the wage has actually raised the costs of living and unemployment.

This minimum wage crap doesn't work. It's time to allow  market forces to determine the wage and price levels.

* A break-up of the too-big-to-fail banks, re-passage of the Glass-Steagal Act separating banks and investment banks, and a reinvigoration of anti-trust law to prevent the creation of monopolies or oligopolies, and undo those that already exist.

The most effective way to break up big banks revolves around not bailing them out. No more moral hazard.

* Elimination of the cap on income subject to the Social Security (FICA) payroll tax, and addition of a 0.25% transaction tax on all stock and bond trades except in tax-advantaged retirement plans, a much higher capital gains tax and a restoration of the inheritance tax to apply to all inherited wealth above $100,000. All these new revenues would be used to raise Social Security benefits sufficiently to ensure for the first time a decent income for all Americans in retirement.

Another soak-the-rich scheme. How has that worked out in Illinois or California?

Answer? It doesn't work. Illinois will have no cash on hand at all in one month. California is facing a nearly $1 trillion pension liability. Municipalities in otherwise wealth enclaves are paying one fourth of their budget toward pension costs.

The reckoning is coming, and it will not be pretty.

I believe that a such national movement, which must be grass-roots, democratic and locally based, if it organized frequent mass actions both in Washington and in the states and municipalities, swarming of Congressional offices both in the capital and in home districts, and pressing candidates during election years, would compel at least the Democratic Party, and perhaps even many Republican office-holders, to act, even if they hold antithetical political views.

 Whatever national movement this guy believes in, he won't find any inroads for it in this country.

The key is to avoid being co-opted by the Democratic Party, and to remain an independent movement.


DAVE LINDORFF is a member of ThisCantBeHappening!, the uncompromised, collectively run, five-time Project Censored Award-winning online alternative news site. His work, and that of colleagues JOHN GRANT, JESS GUH, GARY LINDORFF, ALFREDO LOPEZ, LINN WASHINGTON, JR. and the late CHARLES M. YOUNG, can be found at www.thiscantbehappening.net

There is one element to this story that I like.

He wants to destroy the Democratic Party, which has been co-opted then overtaken by the Communists.

And there is one thing that working people hate more than anything else--allowing someone to take what they have worked for to give to someone else. Those who have survived the welfare cycle have no interest in going back to it, either.

"The Democracy" is doomed, and I am glad to see that the grassroots activists whom the Democratic Party depends on are running away from them, then want to overrun them in droves!

Monday, January 23, 2017

Liberal Former Clinton Administration Acolyte: "The Democratic Party is on Life Support"

It's time for tough love for the (Anti)Democratic Party.

They have lost an election which DNC leaders rigged to ensure that their prized queen would win, first through engineering her victory in the primary against Weekend at Bernie's, then through media frauds and collusion during the General Election.

And Democrats still lost.

Crooked Hillary actually believe that she could lie, cheat, and steal her way through this election, just as Barack Obama had demagogued key issues to shame conservative opponents into silence in the two previous elections.

The Democratic Party has been overrun by communists, socialists, thugs, public sector union cronies, and outright anti-patriotic hatemongers. The former mantra of playing to minorities and social grievances has not worked.

Their embrace of climate alarmism has turned off millions of voters, particularly in rural areas. Once Democratic strongholds have become rapidly Republican, embracing core pro-family values as well as attention to fiscal probity and responsibility.

The Democratic Party is now stuck in the past, with no chance of moving forward. People living in this country now, and those who lived in North America before this nation was born, have experimented with the closed model of oppressive government which stifles innovation and limits liberty.

Robert Reich (Credit: Danorton)
Now the Democratic Party is heading into another political wilderness, from which the leaders have no interest in listening or learning from their mistakes.

Robert Reich, former Labor Secretary under Bill Clinton and current pseudo-intellectual for MoveOn.org, is trying to wake up and save the Democratic Party:

The ongoing contest between the Hillary Clinton and Bernie Sanders wings of the Democratic Party continues to divide Democrats.

This fight is going from bad to worse, no doubt about it.

Reich then declares some sobering news for Democrats (but great news for the rest of us):

The [Democratic] Party is on life support. 

No kidding!

Reich listed the reasons:

1. Democrats are in the minority in both the House and Senate, with no end in sight. 

Democrats are going to face a horrendous Senate map in 2018. In at last five of the 23 seats they have to defend, both Republican Presidential candidates carried those states. In three more. Trump won, and Republicans are dominating at the state level in the legislature as well as the governors' mansion.

The Democratic Party is not going to pick up enough House seats to win back the lower chamber, either. The districts have either been safely drawn to protect (Republican) incumbents, and states with Republican dominance are actually prospering or growing.

Besides, non-Presidential election years are better for Republicans, since they have the larger share of likely voters. And Donald Trump is waging unprecedented successes already.

2. Democrats lost 1,034 state and federal seats. They hold only 17 governorships, and face 32 state legislatures fully under GOP control. 

OUCH! Just let those numbers sink in. Republicans have had their troubles, during the 1930's and shortly after the Watergate Scandal. Both times, however, Republicans bounced back.

3. No one speaks for the party as a whole. 

What does the Democratic Party stand for? More socialism? Bigger government? Anarchism? Tolerance for international and domestic terrorist groups? Rampant corruption?

4. The Party’s top leaders are aging, and the back bench is thin.

They current Senate Minority and House minority leaders are continuing to embrace the very policies which have ensured Democratic minorities for years to come. Arrogance, elitist, out of touch, in bondage to wealthy donors in remote coastal enclaves with no understanding of what every day Americans are enduring.

What's worse for Reich, though, is that he fails to see past the populist mantra to the Constitutional republicanism re-installing itself in Washington DC:

We are now in a populist era. The strongest and most powerful force in American politics is a rejection of the status quo, a repudiation of politics as usual, and a deep and profound distrust of elites, including the current power structure of America.

The problem that Reich and other regressive Democrats are ignoring is that ... socialist policies like the massive redistributionist policies he favors have become ... the status quo.

Young people and their parents are relearning the blessings of liberty. They have experienced eight years of command-control governance, and they do not like it.

It's costly.

It's corrupt.

It's vastly ineffective.

All the hopes and dreams which regressive leftists imparted to Barack Obama are all about to be done away with through the flick of a pen and the use of a phone.

Such is the result of Big Government hubris, now brought low by voters.

Reich continues to diagnose the near-fatal status of the Democratic Party with:

1. Big moneyed interests subsidizing candidates, who in turn reward special interests and their greedy limited goals.

2. The destruction of labor unions, particularly public sector unions. 



In response to these two issues:

The Democratic Party establishment chose the most corrupt, colluding Presidential candidates in modern times. She was a Wall Street puppet from Day One. Further, Democratic policies by their very nature help Big Business to do its dirty deeds, regardless of the hollow mantras of the Democratic Party as "The Working Man's Party."

As for Big Labor, this phalanx represents the perverse and disastrous consequences of big government collectivism. Men and women have been forced to join syndicates and subsidize their left-wing, destructive policies. Cities and now states are going bankrupt as the bills now have to be paid.

The Democratic Power has played the public with their control of the media to spout lies about Republicans and conservatives. Now that the media is crashing and burning, the Democratic Party has nothing left but to consider embracing conservative ideals for a change or go further into irrelevance and decay with a doubling down on socialism.


It's no wonder, then, the Democratic Party is on life support, and with no viable ideas with respect to God, country, and citizenry, they will end up in the ash heap of history just like the Soviet Union and other communistic regimes around the world.

Wednesday, June 29, 2016

The Uninformed James Preston Allen Loses It at Gun-Control Sit-in: "F---k You!"

I was not without my back-handed admirers at Aunt Janice's sit-in in name only.

The editor for the left-wing progressive rage James Preston Allen was there.

"What Neighborhood Council?"


With the ever-present fedora, slick and ready to make the case for failed policies, Allen recognized me in the line to speak at the podium

He started taking pictures of me, too.

Fine with me.

I took some photos myself.

He seemed pretty smug, it seemed, even though he had just been through off the Central San Pedro Neighborhood Council.

All the "progressive" ideas he had been pushing all blew up in his face.

Little houses for the homeless?

$15 an hour minimum wage hikes?

"Arthur is stupid ... because he doesn't agree with my
idiotic, regressive, unproven ideas about ... "


Environmental tyranny, which pushes away good jobs?

When will the Random Lengths Prava get in through their left-leaning brains that the command-control top-down arrogance does not work?

Well, Allen took his casual shots at me and anyone who supports the Second Amendment.

Here are some of his comments.

Check out this link where Allen kisses Aunt Janice's butt, then he takes a jab at the people who threw him out of office.

Then he commented on my comments.

This man has such a limited understanding of the United States Constitution, too.

Here are his comments:

"In the Constitution, there is also the right to life, liberty, and the pursuit of happiness."

Where does this phrase appear in the United States Constitution? Oh, that's right .., it doesn't.

Thomas Jefferson penned those words in the Declaration of Independence.

"Don't know much about ... anything!"


Then came the next set of whoppers:

"And that right actually precedes the Second Amendment."

Once again, little James, the life and liberty part is not even listed as a right in the Constitution.

"And if you look at the Amendments of the Constitution, they have a certain priority ... uh, level."

Oh, so the Framers listed the Bill of Rights based on their importance?! WHAT?!

"And free speech is at the top, and gun ownership is second in the rights ..."

This man is the "progressive" editor in chief. Yes.

I cannot add anything to the sure ridiculousness of those comments.

These two comments say it all:

Jose Martinez Who is this ass clown!?!?Amendments are put in order of importance? The 13th amendment is towards the middle so using his logic guess outlawing slavery is not that important. Idiot! Ass clown!
Ceasar Hurtado hahahahahahahahah what!?

Exactly.

But the best was yet to come at the end of the evening.

So, former ILWU local leader and LA Harbor Commissioner Dave Arian loses it and takes my phone away.

He had to give it back, of course.

Then I walked over to one of the reporters for them to cover Arian's display of aggression.

Then Mr. Allen spoke again.

"You are being provocative, Mr. Schaper ..."

"You are being provocative ... F--k you!"


Well, I will let you enjoy the video for yourself. Click here.

Thursday, June 2, 2016

Joe Biden Violates Our Intelligence By Speaking

Joe Biden: Christians Violate Gay Rights Simply By Existing

Did "Creepy Uncle" Joe really say that?

The gist of it comes through pretty strongly in these statements about homosexual accommodations.

Here are Biden's comments:

My father taught me the simple notion that everyone, everywhere is entitled to be treated with dignity and respect. When it comes to LGBT people, that simple proposition has been painfully difficult to accomplish over the years. But in the last decade, thanks to the astounding bravery of the LGBT community and those who have championed their cause, the United States has made remarkable progress toward the ultimate goal of equality in law and in life. Our progress remains incomplete, but the momentum has shifted in the right direction.

Joe Biden makes culturally insensitive remarks, and he likes to touch women in public--who are not his relatives.

Progress has also been made in many places around the world. But in too many places, life for lesbian, gay, bisexual, and transgender individuals is actually getting worse. In too many places, LGBT community members face violence with impunity, mistreatment by police, the denial of healthcare, or religious condemnation and social isolation.

Joe Biden (Pinterest.com)


Where do these incursions occur?


The best mechanism to confront this hatred is to speak up in favor of universal human rights. Supportive voices must be heard. Today and every day, let us continue to defend the rights of LGBT people, whether from nearby cities or far-off villages. We cannot rest until everyone receives the dignity, respect, and equal treatment under the law that all people deserve.

The funny thing is, that more people are finding their rights trampled upon.

More men and women of individual conscience cannot walk in good conscience according to the values--and the realities they witness.

Joe Biden has never let things like truth or facts get away of his shameless--and shameful--plugs for "tolerance."

His indictments suggest that Christians are the intolerant bigots slowing down true "progress" in our societies.

The lack of wholesome respect for marriage, family, and sexual relations--those problems are setting back our culture.

Joe Biden insults our intelligence and our moral foundations when he speaks.

If he would only follow the wisdom of the Proverbs:

"When a fool keeps his mouth shut, even he will appear wise."