A Final Rant on Wayward, Wannabe GOP Millennials

This post has been circulating in my mind for a few months.

Over those same months I have witnessed a number of break-out star Millennials who were circling in conservative circles over the last five years.

I remember one group of young Latinos who began frequenting the Beach Cities Republicans.

Then there was a small group of Republican Milennials from El Camino College. Some of the bought into lying rhetoric about racism, and they stopped talking to me for a little while. Then they realized that I was pretty open about working with people of all kinds of backgrounds, and they ran away from the lies.

Betran Usher, a wannabe campaign manage who is probably robbing his clients legally since he can't help them in any way, ducked out on a promised speech before the Beach Cities Republicans in 2016. He even spoke with the Guardian as a Trump supporting Latino.

Then he bent over for the corrupted Republican Party of Los Angeles County Central Committee, who threatened to end whatever video-recording gig he would get with them if he went to the Beach Cities Republicans meeting.

A total sellout.

Two years later, he tried to shake my hand, walked up to me to make nice. I told him to blow off.

What planet does these amoral millennials live on? Do they really think that I am for sale, or that I am so desperate to make nice that I can just look askance at their betrayal? I don't think so!

Then there was this David Feiner fink.

He thought I was racist because the racist sellout Betran Usher told him so. He then admitted that it was wrong to believe those hollow lies. So then he wanted to make nice.

I realized then that he was more of a follower than a fighter, more of a flee-er than a faithful difference-maker. The ultimate of all of this came with his short-term gig on the Brown Shirt, er ... Red Elephants. I had no idea how bigoted those types really were.

Then there was David Feiner going along with the corrupt, racist talking points of the Brown Shirt Elephants. One time, he told me that he was completely committed to this idea that race and IQ are uniquely correlated. He believed it because there was this book "The Bell Curve", which answers everything.

The last time that I was on the Brown Shirt Elephants. with the young Anti-Semite Nick Fuentes, it was really sad to for me to see that this guy was propping up and defending all of that garbage. He went along with the whole corrupt wannabe beat-down, and there was no accountability for it.

Since then, it appears that Feiner has left them, but he is invested in playing nice with everyone. Just like self-serving sellout Betran Usher, he wanted to greet me at a fundraiser. I took out my camera immediately and confronted him on the bigoted company he had chosen to keep. He wanted to play defense, then shame me. It failed big time. I later found out that for jealousy's sake he was going to dox a Trump supporter and get that person fired from his job.

What a shameful fraud.

All these so-called conservative Millennials sold out in so many ways. Did they really think that giving up whatever principles they thought they possessed was going to make things work in their favor in the long run? It's so sad to see people so young, with so much potential, throw it away because they stick their finger in the air to see which way the political winds are blowing.

What is it about Millennials in general? Did they not learn about the delayed gratification of standing your ground for what is right? For staying true to something and fighting for it to make it happen?

Then there are the other losers, like Joseph Lopez, Christopher Castillo, and even Harry Tsang. I still recall the losers from the LA County Central Committee bending over backwards to make nice and do whatever would make these Millennials happy. "We can't lose them! We need them, they are the future of the Party!" I would hear off and on.

What future is there if the older generation is looking to younger people who are so selfish, so self-absorbed that they sell out in the face of pressure or politicking? Why would these people sell out? What is the lack of conviction, and why has it become so prevalent among this set?

I submit that they see a similar selling out among the leaders in the Los Angeles County GOP Central Committees. They see a lack of conviction, of integrity among the chairman and executive committee ranks. Why should they do anything less? There is no winning, their is no principled conviction, so they ... sell out and do what other, more "powerful" groups do.

Sad!

That's all I have to say at this time about those wayward wannabes who made no difference.

OUTRAGE! CPAC Reverses Commitment, Bans Pro-Family Groups' Table from CPAC 2018

Brian Camenker, the President of MassResistance, released this eblast about the double-dealing of CPAC Executive Director Dan Schneider.

First, they had received permission to present their booth, which features the dynamic activism to fight the destructive LGBT Agenda.

Then five days ago, Schneider called Brian and told him that he was cancelling the exhibit!

Unbelievable!

Here is the full report. More information will follow:

MassResistance table BANNED from CPAC – after having been accepted. Because of our 2015 comments about the “culture war”.

But LGBT group “Log Cabin Republicans” is allowed!

Is the “Conservative Political Action Conference” really conservative?

February 13, 2018

From CPAC's promotion video.

The Conservative Political Action Conference (CPAC), the oldest and largest annual “conservative” conference in America, has abruptly banned MassResistance from having an exhibit at its 2018 session. The conference begins next week, running Feb. 21-24. CPAC had officially approved MassResistance for a table on January 29, after an involved vetting process. 

But last week CPAC Executive Director Dan Schneider notified MassResistance that the decision has been reversed because of our Biblical approach to fighting the “culture war” (particularly the transgender agenda in public schools) as described in a 2015 speech by MassResistance president Brian Camenker. (See below.)

What is CPAC?

CPAC is huge. Every year it attracts thousands of people from across the US. Over the years, numerous major political figures and presidential candidates have spoken at CPAC, starting with Ronald Reagan.

CPAC goes to great lengths to present itself to the mainstream media as the gathering place for conservatism in America. CPAC and its parent group American Conservative Union (ACU), state that they are “America’s premier conservative voice” and that “ACU defines conservatism” (their emphasis).

But that is very deceiving. Similar to the direction of the GOP establishment, in recent years CPAC has become more libertarian-oriented and pro-LGBT – and hardly any pro-family groups have had exhibits or been sponsors. This seems to mesh with the attendees: approximately half are 18-24, and clearly products of modern culture.

For the past three years (including this year) the radical homosexual group Log Cabin Republicans (LCR) has been a sponsor and exhibitor at CPAC. (Prior to that, another homosexual group called GOProud was an official exhibitor in 2009 and 2010.)

LCR pushes hard to homosexualize the Republican Party and have LGBT officials and judges appointed. They fight for LGBT “anti-discrimination” laws that are used to punish Christian businesses. They’ve pushed hard to force open homosexuality – and recently transgenders – into the U.S. military. They placed an ad in USA Today to strongly denounce the 2016 GOP platform committee for supporting traditional marriage. They brag that they are “creating change.”

In 2016 and 2017 the group Atheist Voter had a table at CPAC. (In 2015, its parent organization, American Atheists, was granted a main stage speech.) The group pushes for God-less government policies, removal of “Christian ideology” from all government, repeal of religious exemptions from onerous LGBT laws, and more reporting requirements on churches. They also support the LGBT agenda, abortion “rights,” and are “fighting abstinence-only until marriage sex education.”

Many of the conference speakers, such as former New Mexico Governor Gary Johnson (speaking this year) are pro-LGBT Libertarians. Marijuana legalizationgroups were CPAC exhibitors in 2015.

How groups get approved by CPAC – including MassResistance

MassResistance registered for a table at CPAC on January 8, six weeks before the conference. We were told that the “approval process” could take 5-7 working days, but to go ahead and make airline and hotel reservations, etc. anyway.

We waited two weeks with no answer. Then on Jan. 24 a conference call was set up to discuss “your organization and your plans for CPAC.” It was with CPAC’s events coordinator and Dan Schneider, the Executive Director. He said he had never heard of MassResistance.

We described the history of MassResistance and the kind of activism we do. We were very up-front about our plans for CPAC. We were going to promote our book, The Health Hazards of Homosexuality, and similar materials. We told Schneider we believe that CPAC’s large constituency of younger people had not been sufficiently exposed to the pro-family message, and he agreed. He said he would like pro-family groups to come to CPAC.

Schneider said that there are four criteria for a group to be approved:

1. The applicant organization must stand for at least one conservative/right-of-center proposition
2. The applicant organization must not exist primarily for a liberal purpose
3. The applicant organization must be legitimate (no overnight pop-ups, no funding by shadowy entities, staff and officers must be philosophically right of center)
4. The applicant organization cannot be disrespectful of either ACU or CPAC

We told him that it was hard to believe that the Log Cabin Republicans would pass this (in light of criterion #2) since they clearly exist to homosexualize the Republican Party and push the LGBT agenda in government and society. (Schneider answered that LCR's support for the Second Amendment was important in their being approved!)

He told us that there is a “CPAC Advisory Council” which includes Family Research Council (FRC) that decides whether a group passes. Schneider told us that Family Research Council had voted to approve Log Cabin Republicans because LRC passes all four criteria. Obviously, this shocked us, but that’s what we were told. He added that there are “gay” employees at both Family Research Council and the Heritage Foundation.

On January 29, MassResistance was officially notified by CPAC that we were approved. So we paid for our table and continued with our plans to attend.

CPAC changes its mind!

But on Thursday afternoon, Feb. 8, we got a phone call from Dan Schneider. He told us that he had decided to rescind our approval. He said it was because of remarks made by Brian Camenker, president of MassResistance, in a video posted in 2015.

The video is of a panel discussion at the Stand4Truth Conference in Salt Lake City in Nov. 2015. It’s titled, “The Truth About Adulterated Doctrine” – how flawed theology subverts the pro-family battles. It includes Dr. Michael Brown, Pastor Dave Welch, Stephen & Janice Graham, and Brian Camenker. It was moderated by Sandy Rios, American Family Association radio host and former president of Concerned Women for America.

In the discussion, Camenker describes the latest chilling horrors of the pro-transgender policies that school officials in Massachusetts are imposing on children, how parents are kept in the dark, and how anyone who disagrees will be punished. His discussion of the transgender agenda in schools continues later when there are questions from the audience.

One of the audience questions involved how we should treat our adversaries in this battle. This brings up a major division in the pro-family movement. How should we react to these school officials who are pushing this evil on innocent, vulnerable children, which could affect their lives forever? Or to a librarian who brings in a cross-dresser in order to confuse 4-year-olds? Or doctors who enthusiastically help confused and deluded teenagers “change” their sex?

Two of the panelists stated that we should only deal with those school officials and others “respectfully,” telling them the “truth in love.”

Camenker said that he disagrees with that. This is a culture war, he said, not a church service. If you want them to actually stop, you have to mean business, including being “insulting and degrading” to these sleazy people if necessary. “I think that we’re misguided in our approach sometimes,” Camenker said. Sandy Rios then interjected, agreeing with Camenker. “I actually think you’re right, Brian. I think that evangelicals have gotten a little bit soft and not understood warfare.”

In other words, we must choose between saving children and pandering to a terribly flawed theology which, according to many prominent Christians activists, masks a fear of confronting the LGBT movement.

(And as so many pro-family conservatives know, the kind of hateful, vulgar, profane vitriol – including death threats – that LGBT activists regularly use against us is something the LGBT movement has no problem with at all. And it’s something that pro-family moderates are afraid to talk about.)

VIDEO: Panel - The Truth about Adulterated Doctrine (2015)
See sections with Camenker:
On the transgender movement in schools: 28:00 – 42:30
More on transgender movement & discussion of theology: 1:02:00 – 1:09:45
(And it’s well worth watching the entire panel discussion!)

Length: 1:12:37

“I’m uncomfortable with that language,” Dan Schneider told MassResistance. (He may also have been upset with the straightforward language from Leviticus condemning homosexuality as an abomination, referenced by both Dr. Brown and Camenker.)

The truth is that it’s radical LGBT groups who are “uncomfortable” with the language, and they have whined about it ever since. Within days of that 2015 panel discussion, LGBT websites went ballistic. Introducing transgender issues to children is part of “LGBT rights” in their eyes, and Camenker was saying this should be confronted strongly.

How did Schneider even stumble upon that 2015 video? It’s only being publicized by radical LGBT and far-left groups. So who told the CPAC Executive Director? It wasn’t publicly known that we were registered. We hadn’t mentioned it publicly. One can only surmise that LGBT activists allied with CPAC (possibly even CPAC employees) brought it to their attention. It’s a very disturbing thought, to be sure.

More questions for CPAC

Camenker then asked Schneider if he was “uncomfortable” with the things that the Log Cabin Republicans are doing, and their goals for America. He was not.

His decision stands, he said. He added that CPAC would reimburse us for any money we lost by canceling our plans. In a bit of added insult, he invited us to pay the individual entrance fees and attend CPAC as regular attendees. We politely declined.

We asked him if any other pro-family groups were having tables at CPAC this year. He said that there weren’t right now, but that the Family Research Council was expected to get one soon. (This was about a week and a half before it starts.) Sure enough, within a few days Family Research Council (FRC) was suddenly listed as a sponsor with a table! This is very strange, because generally a major organization like FRC would sign on several months in advance, not just a few days before.

What does all this mean?

Nothing in Camenker’s comments is contrary to conservative principles!

It became very clear to us that CPAC does not want to offend their pro-LGBT constituency by allowing a group that insists we’re in a serious “culture war” (rather than a “political disagreement”) against those efforts to radically re-order society.

Is this really what conservatism in America has become? What group gets to claim it defines conservatism? Has FRC, whom we all have respected, caved in? Is MassResistance the only pro-family group that’s publicly standing up to powerful sexual-radical movement?

Conservative?? In 2016 the Log Cabin Republicans paid for this ad in USA Todayattacking the GOP's stand for traditional marriage. But CPAC and their "Advisory Council" don't have a problem with this.

GOP = Old White Males? Young Black Republicans Elected in Deep Blue Connecticut

Now this is a story for conservatives upset about Election 2017.

Can you imagine this?

Two young, black college students ran for office in Middletown, Connecticut.

They won their respective bids for local office.

And they are outspoken Republicans!

Learn more about this incredible story in the video above!

Montana GOP Special Election Report: Gianforte Gaining, Quist in Trouble

Just Ahead of Election Day, Rob Quist on the Defense as Greg Gianforte Getting Major Grassroots Boost Ahead of tomorrow’s election, Democrat Rob Quist is on the defense over a Billings Gazette report that he is dodging his property taxes, while Republican Greg Gianforte is getting a “major boost” from grassroots supporters.   CBS Billings: Ahead Of Election Day, Democrat Rob Quist On Defense Over Tax Dodging Watch Here   REPORTER, MIKE DENNISON: He's also faced questions about whether a barn on his family's Flathead Valley property is correctly appraised for tax purposes. The barn has been remodeled to apartments but is still classified as a barn, taxed at a slightly lower level than commercial property. Quist and his wife also didn't report any rental income on their 2016 federal tax return. Quist says the rental income goes to his daughter, Halladay, who is the legal owner of the nine-acre property near Creston. The state revenue officials say they'll be checking if the barn is assessed properly but that the Quists were under no legal obligation to report any changes. Quist says he's done nothing wrong and that the attack is just part of his opponent’s campaign to discredit him.   CBS Helena: Republican Greg Gianforte Is Getting A “Major Boost” From Grassroots Supporters   Watch Here REPORTER, JOSH MENY: Gianforte's campaign has gotten a major boost on the grassroots level in Cascade County in recent weeks. MSU grad Kaitlyn Skoog came from Cascade County to ramp up the ground effort signing up more than 30 committed canvassing volunteers, many of them college students. MSU GRAD KAITLYNN SKOOG: We've hit about thirty thousand people between doors and phones. I’d say every day, on the phones we're hitting about fifteen hundred people, just in the great falls area. on doors we're hitting about five hundred.

Norma Torres Town Hall: Pro-Refugee, Pro-Illegal Activist Compares Remembrance Project Victims to Illegals

This perverse comparison was beyond shocking.

The Millennial generation is obsessed with fairness, equality (whatever that means), and "balance."

Truth is not subject to balance or comparison.

Either a statement is true or it is not true.

Either a viewpoint is based on facts or it is not.

This obsession with trying to incorporate two stark differences to any issue and creating one stance is just wrong.

Either American citizens are alive or dead.

Either a country has borders, or it does not have borders.

Either residents respect the rule of law, or they do not

Witness once again how much this clear law of logic and moral verity gets attacked again and again.

An American citizen is not in the same place or role as an illegal alien.

An American citizen is not a self-identified, de facto law breaker.

I four immigration laws had been enforced, a clear failure of the federal government, the thousands murdered by illegal aliens would still be alive today.

Raul Rodriguez settled the moral insanity once and for all:

Generation Z: More Conservative Than You Think

(H/T Paul Joseph Watson)

Conservatism is indeed the new counter culture.

I would submit that since liberal lunacy as a dominant cultural trend, it had to be this way.

I would also go one step further.

Conservatism resonates now because it's true and bold, specifically with Donald Trump in office.

We are rebelling against 8 years of stolid socialism-lite shoved in our faces.

Younger people have experience what globalist, collectivist forces and impulses look like.

And they don't like it.

The entitlement state particularly is harming them since they will have to pay the bill, even though the Silent Generation and the Baby Boomers got to spend the money with abandon. Obamacare particularly hurts younger generations, since they are struggling to find gainful employment as it is, and now face taxes for not being able to afford health insurances.

Here's the video Watson put together:

This is a thrilling moment for our movement.

Ronald Reagan was a counter-cultural figure in the 1980s. Young people liked him and looked up to him, even though two decades ago they had protested and slandered him on the streets of Sacramento and Berkeley.

COOL!

We are seeing a similar movement right now sweeping across the country.

Young people have experienced the full folly of abject, unrepentant liberalism.

As Watson shares, the regressive Left has become puritanical, censorious, arrogant, overbearing.

I would also add -- Pharisaical. They are no fun, but want to take all the fun away from young people.

Then he shares data from a Daily Mail survey.

Here's the title of the article:

They don't like drugs or gay marriage, and they HATE tattoos: Is 'Generation Z' the most conservative since WW2? 

Teenagers born after 2000 - the so-called 'Generation Z' - are the most socially conservative generation since the Second World War, a new study has found.

Good news!

Being conservative and being cool have become one!

More:

When asked to comment on same-sex marriage, transgender rights and cannabis legislation, 59 per cent of Generation X teenagers said they had conservative views.

WOW!

So much winning!

Why are teenagers so resistance to the left-wing social agenda in particular?

I submit the following reasons:1

1 They have far more access to information. They can compare and contracts views and values much more quickly, without a authoritarian filter preventing them.

2. As Watson argues, their rejecting of this force-fed left-wing frivolity has sparked a youthful rebellion. No one wants to be lectured and shamed ad infinitum by a bunch of boring, feckless, aged social injustice warriors who masquerade as teachers or college professors.

3. They are directly and abruptly witnessing the consequences of the LGBT fads. More people are dying of venereal disease. These youths are more likely to have grown up in a same-sex home, and experienced the negative effects of not having a father or a mother.

Don't believe me? Check out these videos from Hunter Avallone, for example.

Also, Family Research Council President Tony Perkins pointed out that the key leaders to make the RNC platform more conservative--rejected judically redefined marriage, gender fluidity, abortion, and other cultural perversisties--were young people!

Now, why are these Generation Z individuals more conservative?

Young people, who have grown up during the 2008 financial crash, were also more prudent and careful with their finances. A quarter of respondents wanted to save money instead of spending cash they didn't have.

They have experienced with full force that privations and disasters caused by unfettered liberalism. They bear the costs of older generations spending other people's money. The decadence of modern democratic regimes is dehumanizing to witness. Men and women about to die have left trillions in nation debt for the youngsters to pay for!

They have seen what happens to the world under Obama-Pelosi-Reid social engineering--and they don't want it!

Especially the national debt issues. How evil is that?!

Thomas Jefferson had a few words on this:

"“The principle of spending money to be paid by posterity, under the name of funding, is but swindling futurity on a large scale.”

The older generations are stealing from the younger!

Of course Generation Z is more money conscious!

Even Huffington Post had to admit some conservatives strains standing out in younger people:

4. Gen Z is Full of Early Starters

Many employers are predicting that more teens, between the ages of 16 and 18 will go straight into the workforce, opting out of the traditional route of higher education, and instead finishing school online, if at all. Would you make a major investment, possibly leading to years of debt to come—knowing there are new, more affordable (not to mention more convenient) online alternatives coming up every day?

They are developing a work ethic early. They are recognizing that college is not a viable pathway, especially with all the debt that will hound them for decades to come.

They are not going to college, but entering the real world faster -- automatically they will be embracing more conservative, aka realistic, values!

 5. Gen Z Is More Entrepreneurial

According to Gen Z marketing strategist Deep Patel, “the newly developing high tech and highly networked world has resulted in an entire generation thinking and acting more entrepreneurially.” Generation Z desires more independent work environments. As a matter of fact, 72% of teens say they want to start a business someday.

One apparent recurring factor you might notice throughout this post, is that many Gen Z identifying factors can be traced back to the recession in 2008, from their frugality, to their value of experiences, and increased likelihood to become entrepreneurs. This is an interesting note to take down.

There is no better cohort dedicated to conservative values than business owners, particularly those who have created a new product or branded a new service. The future will be a truly liberal--classical liberal--future.

Can you imagine an entire generation that is willing to take on the world and take risks? Can you imagine this new generation, which will be looking for elected officials who share and promote their values? 

Indeed, the future is looking good for conservatives.

How about this dynamic?

7. Gen Z Is Big On Individuality

Gen Z’ers were born social. In fact, nearly 92% of Gen Z has a digital footprint. Arguably as a result of the celebrities and media they follow, Gen Z seeks uniqueness in all walks of life primarily through the brands they do business with, future employers, etc.

Individuality, people, the exact opposite of the stifling, boring, and life-threatening collectivism posited by the regressive Left, Barack Obama, Crooked Hillary, and the deeply old and unpopular Democratic Party leaders.

Wow!

Of course, check out what the New York Times had to report:

While the millennial generation infamously pioneered the Facebook beer-bong selfie, many in Generation Z have embraced later, anonymous social media platforms like Secret or Whisper, as well as Snapchat, where any incriminating images disappear almost instantly, said Dan Gould, a trend consultant for Sparks & Honey, an advertising agency in New York.

“As far as privacy, they are aware of their personal brand, and have seen older Gen Y-ers screw up by posting too openly,” Mr. Gould said.

They are aware of the consequences of what they say and do.

That is a conservative outlook! To recognize that one's behaviors and words can affect the future, too!

Where does this more conservative take on life stem from?

Part of that obsession with safety is likely due to the hard times that both Generation Z members and their parents experienced during their formative years.

Perhaps.

Perhaps indeed.

Even Catholic organizations are recognizing a more conservative trend among Generation Z:

The newer generations are learning from the failures of previous ones and seem to be quick to learn from their parents and grandparents. Where will Generation Z take the United States? If they keep their conservative views, it's possible they could be the generation to make America a God-fearing nation and a truly great country once more.

Nothing warms the heart of this Gen X-Gen Y conservative than to see Gen. Z following close behind in my--our--footsteps.

Hope: Millennial Blasts LGBT (Whatever) Agenda Targeting Kids

This post has taken me a little longer than I had expected.

So much has been going on in the last three weeks, it's hard to keep up with all the winning.

Hunter Avallone came onto the scene for me about two months ago.

He is a conservative millennial not afraid to dress down his squishy peers whose feelings get hurt and want to go after everyone and everything Republican, conservative, or pro-Trump.

I had my concerns about the younger voters in this country.

So many of them end up in college, and become brain-dead liberals with nothing to offer this country.

Many of them are being indoctrinated to hate this country and our values, while caving to political correctness, multiculturalism, and regressive leftist ideologies.

The latest video from Hunter Avallone takes down an offensive and deeply disturbing "kids" video from an unkempt lesbian.

She is basically teaching the kindergarten and pre-school set that the LGBT identity cause (crisis) is A-OK, and just like eating apples and oranges, and reciting the alphabet.

The video is called "QUEER Kids Stuff."

Creepy" is more accurate. I would also add "criminal".

Teaching kids that homosexuality is OK, and that liking "boys and girls" is cool will only teach kids to further question their identities-- and hurt their bodies.

This is 1984-style imposition of lies on a grand scale.

And Hunter slams it like a boss!

Of course, there are other videos of men and women slamming this icky, creepy YouTube channel.

What makes Hunter's channel and video stand out?

1. He's a Millennial (or Generation Z  post-Millennial?)

These videos and others put to death the lie that for conservatives and Republican politicos to make a difference and win office again, they have to pander on gay marriage, the LBGT agenda, etc.

I have often believed that if we simply tell people the truth--old and young--they will recognize that this aggressive LGBT ideology is a house of cards ready to topple, just like the Soviet Union did in 1989.

Political parties cannot expect to last long if they pander and peddle falsehoods.

Entire civilizations have died out after drifting away from the most stable and necessary unity of any society: the family and the clear biological gender distinctions which every person displays.

2. It's an upbeat as well as politically incorrect message that is not afraid to tell it like it is. Hunter doesn't even hold back on calling the "woman?" instructor in the video a "dyke."

The Human Rights Campaign and other left-wing groups have targeted this tech-savvy Millennial has a hatemonger, too! INCREDIBLE!

Since when would anyone say such a term without fearing the wrath of a college administrator or the thought police?

3. He lives in deep-blue Maryland. Granted, the Old Line State has a Republican Governor (Go Larry!) Most conservatives and Republicans are convinced that there is no point getting involved or invested in blue states like Maryland, or at least doing so based on the same platform of the national GOP.

Videos like this and the growing counter-cultural temperament of youth would suggest that Republicans embrace their pro-life and pro-family values without fear.

Final Reflection

I may be jumping to some conclusions on the issues and inferences I have reached, but I think that the growing movement of young people, fed up with regressive leftist, statist abuse shoved in their faces, will ensure that our values are not just right, but will succeed at the local and state level across the country again.

Millennial Pins Down the Big Problems with Millennials

Hunter Avallone is a new conservative YouTube sensation, of sorts.

He has a sardonic wit about him, and has no problem calling out the poltiical correctness in his culture.

He is a Maryland residents, like a growing cohort of conservatives fed up with the bad direction of the country under the Obama Administration.

This young man should connect with the Hogan Administration.

Is there a new conservative movement breaking out in the Old Line State?

What is particularly welcoming about this young man? He blows up the whole transgender nonsense. He is no afraid to outline the differences between men and women

Check out this video, slamming his coddled Millennial generation in the video below:

Millennials are full invested their feelings.

What they sense about any event is the final and ultimate determinant if something is write or wrong

They whine and cry because they do not get their way all the time.

Avallone criticizes public education and the university system for perpetuating this perpetual childhood among young adults.

Now college deans are intervening to determine which events are acceptable and which are unacceptable. If events, ideas, or behaviors are deemed offensive to one group or even one person, they get shut down.

How has it come to this?

Younger people today were taught to value their own views at the expense of everyone else's. They grew up believing that everything would shift if their favor, or that Mommy and Daddy would make everything better.

Normally, this kind of immature, destructive mentality afflicted a few kids because of indulgent parents.

Hunter Avallone

Today we have a society full of young people who did not have parents, or the parents who heeded a modern idea of parenting. This "new" method taught parents to let children make all the decisions for themselves and not worry about values or ethics outside of themselves.

The result? An entitled, pampered, lost generation.

And a violent one which breaks laws, disrupts the peace and prosperity of private citizens, and resorts to force and riot-sized temper tantrums.

Not good.

I commend this young man for blasting his fellow 20-something peers. That takes real courage, something that their parents never possessed.

Perhaps political leaders and managers should recognize the blunt wisdom of this young man, and stop catering to the younger Millennial set that refuses to grow up. Let's stop acknowledging the hurt feelings of self-righteous brats who inhabit big bodies. They need to grow up, and growing up may be hard to do--for the short term--but it's necessary for long-term life and happiness.

Again, this video is so refreshing, precisely because this Millennial calls out his own Millennial generation.

"Stop acting like little babies. It's time to act like adults now."

Election 2016, and The Millennial Conservative Resurgence on Marriage

One of the best news I heard from the Election 2016 RNC Platform Committee discussion.

Millennials were the key architects for ensuring a more conservative political party platform.

That's right -- the "young people".

Tony Perkins from the Family Research Council reported on this interesting development.

I am aware that a large number of Millennials currently support gay marriage.

This disturbing trend is a really a problem starting with our terrible public schools, and the Alinsky-ite rhetoric overtaking our political discourage.

Most young people have been hit so many times with the fear of shame--of being labeled a backward bigot--that many of them have simply caved on the issue.

More young people are becoming pro-life, by the way.

The cowardice of our elders, our political leaders, and the teachers in our churches I think deserves more blame.

Mom and Dad matter, and gender is not something that can be changed, altered, removed, or ignored simply because we feel like it.

Why is it that so many Millennials are on board with "gay marriage"?

They do not see how the destruction of the family affects them.

They have been inured into this Libertarian fantasy by some conservatives, and a sense of resigned acquiescence by the older people in their midst.

We either have a society founded on the rule of law, natural law, God's law, or we do not.

When younger people learn the destructive consequences of perverse behaviors, they will reject this agenda.

And more of them already are.

The Baptist Press reports:

Called to speak at the March 26 marriage rally in Washington, D.C., Alison Howard ran to the stage's microphone in an adrenaline-fueled burst. The 24-year-old graduate of Liberty University said she wanted to "talk to the grown-ups" supporting traditional marriage at the event on the National Mall.

"Do not give up on us young people," said the communications director for Concerned Women for America. "The media will tell you that I don't exist. Well, I'll be the unicorn. I do exist, and I believe in the marriage between a man and a woman."

It's not too late.

What is needed, though, is moral courage and political will.

Read more about her incredible life and views heree:

Her first job was at a New York consulting firm. The company decided to celebrate National Coming Out Day by having its employees wear badges in support of the gay community. Seery, a Catholic, dealt with the social debate the way many in her generation do: by blogging. That led to her position with the network, which has chapters in 25 schools.

Confrontation remains part of the job: In February, a liberal group at Columbia University hijacked a Love and Fidelity values conference by reserving the bulk of the tickets. They interrupted the speaker, standing to protest with signs.

But Seery doesn't believe the marriage cause is lost: "Just because things are polling one way today doesn't mean that will always be the case. Forty years ago the media said that all young people are becoming pro-choice. We proved them wrong. The youngest generation is the most pro-life generation."

Yes indeed!

Another Millennial explains the core of the conflict for many young people.

Eric Teetsel, the 29-year-old executive director of the Manhattan Declaration, also spoke at the March 26 rally in Washington, encouraging the crowd not to grow weary. Teetsel sees young believers who struggle with being fully Christian while enmeshed in contemporary culture. They go to church, but they also watch "The Daily Show." And, according to Teetsel, they often don't do well integrating those worlds. Fearing blowback on Twitter and Facebook, many young Christians remain silent on marriage even if they have not embraced the changing attitudes.

Young people need to know that they are called to the Benjamin Generation, to have courage and receive the grace of God to reign in life, and overcome the reproach of men.

Then this Millennial explains a deeper reason why the fight for natural marriage has met unprecedented challenges:

"We wasted a generation by being complacent and by believing that people would always understand what marriage is and why it matters," said Teetsel, whose group promotes life, marriage and religious liberty. "That's no longer true, and now we have got to show them."

We need to teach one another and the next generation why marriage matters!

Here's another great video affirming natural marriage.

This video outlines the biological, sociological, and moral advantages of natural marriage.

Compare this presentation with the one-side discussion between Piers Morgan and Ryan Anderson of the Heritage Foundation.

As long as we do not equip young people about the biological necessities and moral values about natural marriage, we are depriving Millennials--and all marriage proponents--with the tools needed to establish the necessities of natural marriage, and how to counteract the homosexual agenda trying to upend and redefine this fundamental institution.

Open Letter to "Progressives"

A lot of people--particularly--believe that our society needs to be more open, tolerant,

progressive

How do they define progressive, however?

How is individual license run rampant "progress"?

What is good about the erosion of borders, and the erection of "tolerance" as the Supreme Being above all others?

The race for who can be more inclusive has created a society where more people feel excluded.

Demand what should be versus what is -- that is a recipe for more pain.

Let's take a California example of this fight, and expand on it.

Sean Flynn jumped into the race for Congressional District 31.

Why?

A conservative Republican was already working the precincts, preparing for a rematch against the incumbent freshman Democrat Peter Aguilar.

Who is this Sean Flynn?

He wrote a book called "Economics for Dummies."

But ...

He has donated to Democratic candidates in the past.

He is getting lots of money from liberal donors, too.

Some Republicans have also invested money in this Democratic Plant.

He is liberal on key issues, apparently, and will not answer direct uestions on marriage or family when pressed by concerned conservatives.

Over the last week, he released two very deceptive  mailers.

And yet a lot of young people are lining up behind him.

Why?

I suspect that they are attached to the flimsy argument that candidates must give up on the cultural issues.

Virtue is not as important as making lots of money and being left alone.

Yet prosperity and privacy cannot persist without eternal principles.

Rights are not entitlements, and must promote good, not evil.

The fight within the Republican Party, and within any movement, all rests on "Double-Down" or "Give a Little".

Too much "giving a little" has ended up giving up too much.

Liberty is not a partial commodity, but an eternal verity, or a non-existent fantasy.

So, to all the young "progressives" out there, please tell me why your attachment to "I don't care" and "Do as you please" is progress.

Our values and traditions, the life and liberty we enjoy did not come about from socially autistic self-interest.

Rules in place, morals founded on eternal verities, a recognition that the right and the good do not emanate from ourselves--this is true progress.

Something that does not stem from ignoring realities, are trying to achieve an ideal society through human machinations.

Again, what is the true and proper definition of progress? And how do these destructive, narrow-minded values further our lives?

(Hint: THEY DON'T!)