Wednesday, May 9, 2018

BREAKING: First City In Liberal Los Angeles County Opts Out of Sanctuary State Law

This is YUGE, folks!

YUGE!

Los Angeles County is not a lost cause, and there are still strong, pro-American bastions in the county, despite the mass invasion of illegal aliens to the county and throughout the state. I've been to Santa Clarita before, and the region reminds me more of Orange County, where the streets are clean, residents are safe, and businesses are prosperous.

I understand that leaders in the Northern Los Angeles County region wanted to take whatever steps were possible to break away from the Downtown LA and form their own counties, too! They should step up their efforts to break away from the empire of Los Angeles.

Even in this county, which was once a wonderful red jewel of conservatism (B-One Bob Dornan served as the Congressman for the Westside and the South Bay sections of Los Angeles County), there is still hope.



Santa Clarita, CA has declared their opposition to SB 54 and filed an amicus brief against this wicked, unconstitutional law.

Check out the report from the local Santa Clarita Valley newspaper:



Neighbors divided over how to treat strangers clashed outside and inside Santa Clarita City Hall for hours Tuesday.

Hundreds of Santa Clarita residents spoke at the City Council meeting until 1 a.m. supporting or opposing a federal lawsuit against California Senate Bill 54, the law that limits state and local law enforcement cooperation with federal immigration authorities.

Ultimately, Santa Clarita City Council members voted unanimously to file an amicus brief against the state that would join them in the federal lawsuit by the Trump administration.

This is a massive win. Reports had trickled into me over the past month which suggested that the city council didn't want to touch the issue at all. They were rightly concerned about the massive overflow of Brown Supremacists and Open Border bigots who would invade the city council chambers.

In spite of these repeated, offensive efforts, the pro-American, pro-rule of law demonstrators showed up in big numbers and took over the city council chambers.

Councilman Bob Kellar expressed strong support for the brief, as did Mayor Pro Tem Marsha McLean and Mayor Laurene Weste.

“We’ve lost deputies in this valley,” Weste said. “Limiting law enforcement from agency to agency is a mistake.”

Ann Coulter and other pro-enforcement writers and activists have pointed out at length that these open border policies hurt working and middle class communities. "The rich" have no problem with open borders, amnesty, and cheap labor because the ill effects of mass immigration do not hurt them.

They hurt the rest of us, and our law enforcement.

Councilman Bill Miranda reminded citizens they could only represent so many of their interests.

“(We keep hearing), ‘there are three of you running for election and you better be careful,’” Miranda said. “Understand one thing: it’s not about elections. It’s about doing the right thing for the right reasons. If that means I don’t get elected, so be it.”

This was one of the most moving comments at the end of the meeting. I appreciate elected officials who push aside left-wing bullying and vote the "right" way--in both senses of the word.

Councilman Cameron Smyth, who had previously served in the California Assembly, said they had received 442 emails that opposed the state law and 63 that wanted to stand with S.B. 54.

This is the first time to my knowledge that an elected official announced not just the massive amount of correspondence to the city council, but evidenced to the public that the vast majority of residents and stake holders in the city and the county wanted the city of opt out of SB 54.

This is an incredible victory. Just incredible.

This is big news, but the local, liberal press will go out of their way to cover this up or ignore. MyNewsLA.com, for example, didn't bother reporting on this issue.

Here's the latest report from the Los Angeles Times:


At least the Los Angeles Times recognized--however grudgingly--that Santa Clarita broke the open borders grip on Los Angeles County.

So happy, but also very jealous!

Notice the veneer of contempt for the audience:

The council chamber was packed Tuesday night, with people standing in aisles and doorways and spilling out into an overflow room as approximately 200 had signed up to speak. Many wore red "Make America Great Again" caps. Some snacked on popcorn while others cooled themselves with fans.

People in the audience were eating popcorn. Really. That's an important detail in the story?

Wow, no wonder there is a decline in respect and support for the press.



Some said SB 54, which limits cooperation by local law enforcement with federal immigration authorities, would promote criminality, while others said it would make communities safer. Some cited legal explanations for why the law violates the Constitution, while others argued that California was within its rights.

"I don't understand. When these people have committed a crime … why can't one agency be able to call another agency?" Annette Burns said.

"California has overreached," Susan Agnes, a resident and mother of two, said.

One correction: MANY people have said that SB 54 not only limits contact among different law enforcement agencies, state and federal, but that the legislation protects criminals and endangers working, law-abiding citizens.

In March, Los Alamitos approved an ordinance claiming exemption from SB 54. That same month, Orange County signed on to the federal lawsuit against California over SB 54 and other laws protecting immigrants. Huntington Beach has also sued California in state court.

Santa Clarita City Councilman Bob Kellar initiated discussion on this issue in March.

"I feel very strongly that this whole thing of having a sanctuary state and sanctuary cities is ridiculous," he told the Santa Clarita Valley Signal at the time. "We are putting our American citizens at additional risk and there's no question about this — it's costing our state ungodly billions of dollars."

Mr. Kellar is a former police officer. He understands the stresses and dangers which law enforcement face on a daily basis. SB 54 has made their jobs so much harder. This is inexcusable. He was blunt, outspoken, and right on target. So happy that Kellar was there to speak the truth and demand justice and the rule of law for Santa Clarita residents, LA County and the entire state of California.

Santa Clarita's resolution also directs the city attorney to file a brief in support of the Trump administration's lawsuit against the state of California "if and when appropriate." (A hearing on the administration's request for a preliminary injunction is scheduled for June. The deadline for submitting briefs supporting the administration was April 6.)

This portion of the resolution is crucial to share with other cities and county boards. Just because the first lawsuit deadline has passed does not indicate that there will not be another chance--and there will be. Bet on it!

The LA Times article is worth referencing because they drag the politics of this move into the article, and try to turn this into a mere political stunt:

The measure is largely symbolic. Santa Clarita contracts with the L.A. County Sheriff's Department for law enforcement services and is bound by that department's policies, including on immigration.

Still, "symbolic politics is a part of politics," said Raphael Sonenshein, executive director of the Pat Brown Institute for Public Affairs at Cal State Los Angeles.

In fact, words and principles are symbolic, too, and amicus briefs are effective and essential for ensuring that major issues are taken care of, that people stand up to these issues and demand that their government respect their rights and secure their persons.

The Times' go to left-wing pundit, Rafe Sonenshein, let's his liberal bias ooze out:

"This is an opportunity to mobilize the conservative base around the issue that most animates the conservative base, which is immigration," Sonenshein said. "It doesn't mean that the City Council has the power to change anything right now … but it elevates the issue and certainly Republicans see it as an issue that might bring people to the polls."

Illegal immigration animates everyone, not just Republicans. Blacks, whites, Hispanics, Republicans, Democrats are all fed up with open borders, mass migration, the erosion of our sovereignty, and the diminution of our rights as citizens. Once again, the corporate media are so tone-deaf. They just don't understand how harmed, how overwhelmed the public has become with illegal immigration, mass migration, sanctuary jurisdictions, etc.

Santa Clarita is the fourth-largest city in L.A. County, with a population of about 180,000. About 32% identify as Hispanic or Latino, according to 2016 census estimates.

Why does the Times focus on the Latino population? Are they readily assuming that all illegal aliens are Latino? That's racist!

Final Reflection

I wish that I could have been there to celebrate, but it's really heart-warming and encouraging to see so many patriots lining up, stepping up, and speaking out against SB 54 and for the rule of law. I was worried about Santa Clarita, but only because residents in the city and throughout the region were concerned that the city was not going to take a strong stance against the lawlessness and against the Open Border brown Supremacists who only care about identity politics and La Raza.

For now, all I can say is "Way to Go, Santa Clarita!"



We the People Rising: Santa Clarita VICTORY!

We The People Rising http://wethepeoplerising.com
EMAIL robinhvidston@wethepeoplerising.com or  rhvidston1@yahoo.com
Email not displaying correctly?
View it in your browser.
NOTE: The Santa Clarita City Council Meeting Did Not End Until 1:30am!
Santa Clarita: FIRST LA COUNTY CITY TO OPPOSE THE SANCTUARY STATE LAW!


CITY OF SANTA CLARITA VOTES 5-0 TO OPPOSE SB 54!


SEE the victory celebration video at 1:30am!
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=w2Z6RXiAUuc

5/8/18 Santa Clarita, CA
Preliminary Report by Robin Hvidston
SEE the city council vote and pass the resolution unanimously
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qMttSy-homM

A very passionate overflow crowd attended the Santa Clarita City Council meeting as the Sanctuary State issue was item #16 on the agenda. Greg Aprahamian of Santa Clarita organized the event and his official report is forthcoming. The city council voted unanimously to support a resolution opposing SB 54 and will also sign an amicus brief in support of the federal lawsuit.  


Opposition such as the pro illegal Los Angeles based CHIRLA http://www.chirla.org/ as well as Indivisible groups and Bernie Sanders' Our Revolution members attend the council meeting.  Groups opposing SB 54 included We The People Rising, The Remembrance Project, American First Latinos, EIP, LA County for Trump, Make California Great Again and Latinos For Trump.

There were 62 public speakers who opposed the Sanctuary State Law and 38 speakers who supported the Sanctuary State Law. Greg Aprahamian's full report will be forwarded when it is published online.

 

City Council Group Photo
All 5 city council members spoke out in support of the rule law and voted to oppose SB 54!
From left to right, Mayor Laurene Weste, Councilmember Cameron Smyth, Mayor Pro Tem Marsha McLean,Councilmember Bob Kellar and Councilmember Bill Miranda

Santa Clarita City Council
https://www.santa-clarita.com/city-hall/city-council


5/8/18 city council agenda - Sanctuary State Issue #16
http://santaclaritacityca.iqm2.com/Citizens/FileOpen.aspx?Type=1&ID=1383&Inline=True


George Soros funded organizationsGeorge Soros funded organizations:  

NEWS COVERAGE


Santa Clarita may join other cities in opposing California's 'sanctuary' law
 
  

Santa Clarita may join other cities in opposing California's 'sanct...

By Nina Agrawal
The Santa Clarita City Council is expected to take up a resolution Tuesday to oppose SB 54, known as the Califor...
 


Fox & Friends>>>shows lots of us then Tomi Lauren (sp) on F&F
Santa Clarita City Council Votes to Support Trump Administration Sanctuary State Lawsuit
 
  

Santa Clarita City Council Votes to Support Trump Administration Sanctuary ...

 



CH 7:
Santa Clarita city council - Bing video

Senate Conservatives Fund: YUGE Victory in West Virginia for MAGA Agenda

I can't withhold my joy following the May 8th, 2018 primaries in four states:

1. Indiana
2. North Carolina
3. Ohio
4. West Virginia

The US Senate GOP primary in West Virginia was not only contentious, but worrisome. Would establishment candidate Evan Jenkins make it? What about that Blakenship guy, a convicted felon who had violated mining laws and endangered the lives of his workers?

The best candidate was -- and it -- Patrick Morrisey. A conservative, concerned citizen, and well-read attorney general is the best candidate going forward to fight for working West Virginians.

But ... within days of the primary, it looked as if the convicted felon was going to win the primary. The shock poll had everyone worried.

But ... Morrisey pulled it off!

Here's the full report from the Senate Conservatives Fund:

Senate Conservatives Fund
Patrick Morrisey (R-WV)

Arthur:

We are very proud to report that Attorney General Patrick Morrisey, our endorsed candidate for U.S. Senate in West Virginia, won the Republican nomination yesterday.

Morrisey won this race despite the fact that Senator Mitch McConnell (R-KY) and his political machine supported liberal Congressman Evan Jenkins (R-WV) and despite the fact that he was massively outspent by Don Blankenship (R-WV).

This is a major victory for conservatives, but now we need to help Morrisey defeat liberal Senator Joe Manchin (D-WV).

Please help replace a liberal Democrat with a strong conservative by making a contribution to Patrick Morrisey's campaign.

SCF will pay all processing fees and transfer 100% of your contribution to his grassroots campaign.

Individuals are allowed to donate up to $2,700 to Morrisey for the general election and couples can give up to $5,400. But any amount will help him get his message out, win this seat, and become a powerful voice for conservatives in the Senate.

Please make a contribution of $25, $50, $100, or more to Patrick Morrisey's U.S. Senate campaign.

Thank you for making this victory possible. Your support for SCF and Patrick Morrisey has put us in a place where we can elect someone who will truly fight for our principles.

Sincerely,
Ken Cuccinelli II
Ken Cuccinelli II
President
Senate Conservatives Fund
@KenCuccinelli / @SCF



Please share this on Facebook and Twitter.

Now, what about Joe Manchin, the embattled incumbent?

Well, he was facing a primary challenge from the left, a Bernie-crat socialist who wanted the government to do more for the hurting West Virginians, when government excesses are causing the rising poverty and privation.

Men need work, and Washington DC has spent more time undermining the working classes and backbone industries which have made America great and kept the country independent from foreign influence and intervention.

Manchin won his primary, but with 60% of the vote. Nearly 40% of West Virginia Democrats wanted someone else besides Manchin. This guy is not only facing a tough general election, but it looks as though the state is going to become a GOP sweep from top to bottom.

There is no way Manchin can survive now, especially with a candidate so well-liked by the President and the manifold coalition of Trump supporters who define West Virginia today.

Tuesday, May 8, 2018

Red Heifer at the Bacigalupi Ranch

The Red Heifer is a significant creature in the Bible.


The imagery of the blood of the heifer without blemish being sacrificed and its blood cleansing from sin is a foreshadowing of the blood of Christ shed on the cross for believers’ sin. He was “without blemish” just as the red heifer was to be. As the heifer was sacrificed “outside the camp” (Numbers 19:3), in the same way Jesus was crucified outside of Jerusalem: “And so Jesus also suffered outside the city gate to make the people holy through his own blood” (Hebrews 13:11-12). 

It was surprising to see a red cow (she was no longer a heifer, since she had a calf nearby).

Still, a red bovine in the midst of all black cattle was a striking feature of the Bacigalupi Ranch last night.

Just wanted to focus in on that picture for everyone to see:




Siskiyou County: Boards of Supervisors, Republican Women Federated Group (Photos)


























Victory: Trump Withdraws from Bad Iran Deal

Senate Conservatives Fund
“The Iran Deal was one of the worst and most one-sided transactions the United States has ever entered into.” – President Donald J. Trump

Arthur:

President Trump announced his decision today to withdraw the United States from the Iran deal and to re-impose sanctions that were lifted under the agreement.

This is a major victory for America's national security interests and President Trump should be applauded for his leadership.

The Iran deal enriched an evil regime that lied about its efforts to develop nuclear weapons, and supports terrorist groups that are hostile to America and our allies.

Please take a moment to send the president an email thanking him for making this important decision.

As you know, President Trump will be criticized for this by liberals in Congress and in the media. It's important that we communicate our support for his conservative policies. When shows leadership like this, he needs to know that we have his back.

Click here to send an instant message to the White House.

Thank you for being part of our team and for doing so much to help us work against this failed agreement.

Now we must work together to support President Trump's efforts to secure our borders. Too many Republicans in Congress are dragging their feet on this and putting our nation at risk.

Sincerely,
Ken Cuccinelli II
Ken Cuccinelli II
President
Senate Conservatives Action



Please share this on Facebook and Twitter.

BREAKING: Twitter Silencing Black Republican US Senate Candidate

Hey Arthur – did you see this late-breaking news from last night?

We were hard at work spreading our first television ad online through social media, until Twitter began blocking you from watching it. Make no mistake, Twitter is deciding FOR you what type of messages you should see.

Really, what they're trying to say is that a strong conservative message centered on national security is offensive, and you should avert your eyes. If Silicon Valley elites are going to block our message online, it's even more critical that we keep our ad on television.

Thank you,
Tori Sachs
Campaign Manager
John James for Senate

On Mon, May 7, 2018 at 10:53 PM, John James 
 
John James for Senate

I’ll make this quick. My first television ad is being censored by liberal Silicon Valley elitists. This isn’t first time Twitter has been caught censoring a strong conservative message and it’s absolutely outrageous!

Tonight, we were alerted by followers that my television ad was being blocked on the social media platform.
 
Make no mistake, I see right through this ploy.
Make no mistake, I see right through this ploy.
 
Make no mistake, I see right through this ploy. This is the handiwork of the Democratic Party Marketing Machine.

We MUST fight back! Will you join me and my grassroots army by standing up against liberals trying to protect Debbie Stabenow? Donate now >>>
 
 
I can’t do this without you.

Thank you,
John James
 
 
John James

Paid for by John James For Senate, Inc.
PO BOX 27363, LANSING, MI 48909
This email was sent to arthurschaper@hotmail.com