Sunday, September 4, 2016

Beach Cities Republicans--Announcements for Labor Day Weekend



Hello, Beach Cities Republicans!

What did I tell you about the media and the polls?

They are dead-set against Trump, but even they have to concede that he is on the rise.

There is so much corruption in the national press these days, you have to look at many sources to get the truth.

Lo and Behold—Donald Trump is now ahead nationally, and is closing the gaps in the swing states, including must-wins Florida, Ohio, and … Pennsylvania!

California is not a swing state  … yet, but guess what?

Donald Trump is opening up a Los Angeles County campaign headquarters.

He has kept his promise: He will compete in California!

Also …

Our Assemblyman David Hadley has been reaching out to all voters, making the rounds, forming strong connections with businesses and community leaders.

He has voted to protect our liberties and our pocketbooks, while Sacramento Democrats continue to tax and spend our state into bankruptcy!



Let’s GOTV for Hadley!

Campaign HQ:
23215 Hawthorne Blvd.
Torrance, CA 90505
Contact Dylan Gray for dates and times to volunteer:

The next Beach Cities Republicans meeting is going to be YUGE!

Craig Huey, the Founder and CEO of Election Forum, will be speaking to our group.

He will go over the Presidential, U.S. Senate, and down-ticket races, and the 17 Propositions that will be on the ballot. That’s right—SEVENTEEN!—and you can’t trust the commercials or the flyers.
Since it’s Election Season in full swing, we will be hosting debate-watching parties, too! Make sure to mark your calendars!

So, here’s info on upcoming events:

LA County for Trump campaign headquarters kick-of:
Saturday, September 10 from 10 AM - 2 PM
Los Angeles County for Trump headquarters
2338 E. Anaheim St. #201-C
Long Beach, CA 90804



Thursday, September 15th, 6pm no-host Dinner
7pm Meeting
Beach Cities Republicans, Election Forum with Craig Huey
Sizzler Restaurant
2880 W. Sepulveda Blvd
Torrance, CA 90505



Sunday, October 9th
Debate Watching Party
5:00-6:00pm Social Hour
6:00-8:30 Debate
Sizzler Restaurant
2880 W. Sepulveda Blvd
Torrance, CA 90505


Wednesday October 19th
Debate Watching Party
5:00-6:00pm Social Hour
6:00-8:30 Debate
Sizzler Restaurant
2880 W. Sepulveda Blvd
Torrance, CA 90505

            
Arthur Schaper
President, Beach Cities Republicans



Saturday, September 3, 2016

Mark Leno, Don't Let The Door Hit You On the Way Out of Sacramento!

The Los Angeles Times fawns over its liberals, especially the ones who have done so much to hurt our state, its citizens, and students.

UGH!

I am not happy that Democrats have so much power in Sacramento.

What do we have to be proud from the petulant progressives in Sac-Town?

REALLY?!

There is a glimmer of good news.

Mark Leno, the openly homosexual regressive Democrat (in name only, because he's really a perverted statist) is leaving the state legislature for good!

The Los Angeles Times tried to play up his exit as a final homecoming, as if everyone in the state will miss him.

Believe me, I hope that the door does not (or should it?) hit him on the way out!

From the Los Angeles Times:


UGH!

Where do I vomit?!

Mark Leno flashes a broad smile when a conversation about his political legacy pivots to an earlier part of his life, when he was a restless young man who abruptly decided to walk away from rabbinical school without any plan for what would come next.

What is he so proud of?

He shoved the destructive, anti-biological homosexual agenda on everyone.

He forced through the forced wage hike which will drive businesses underground or out of business entirely.

He has been the sprearhead piercing this state's economy and culture.

“My friend gave me a T-shirt that year for Hanukkah that said, ‘Rebbe Without A Cause,’” Leno said with a laugh.

Rebbe? Don't rub me the wrong way.

To know him is to get the joke: This is a man full of causes, ones for which the Democrat has patiently and passionately advocated during a 14-year career in the California Legislature that’s now coming to a close.

The best cause will be his leaving the state of California.

God forbid this guy should replace Nancy Pelosi when she retires (or dies in office).

“If there's a theme throughout this, it’s that I fight for the underdog,” Leno said. “Whoever that underdog may be."

Underdog? Really? This man is a dog of a legislator, chewing away at what's left for everyone else.

The gay bullies are not underdogs. They are attacking everyone else.

They are no longer "the oppressed." They are the oppressors. They are attacking men and women's freedom of conscience.

They are going after private institutions.


Through the years, his causes have often led to substantive change, in part because of what friends and even foes agree is his unmatched perseverance. Leno, the author of 161 laws, rarely gives up.

In almost all of his celebrated achievements — this year’s deal to boost California’s minimum wage to $15 an hour, to require police search warrants to access electronic devices or Internet service providers, more probation services for felons — the fight took years. Some efforts, such as one of the nation’s first efforts at single-payer universal healthcare, may never come to fruition.

So, with that forced wage hike, where will all the released prisoners find new jobs?

Leno is undaunted.

“You just chip away, year after year after year,” he said. “You start getting some cracks in that wall, and then sometimes circumstances change.”

That's exactly what Republicans, that's exactly what conservatives are going to do.

We are going to chip away at the corruption, malfeasance, waste, and irresponsibility of the Democratic Party and their corrosive dominance in California.

Forced out of office by term limits, the state senator who championed an expansion of gay rights, reform of the prison sentencing system and new warnings on flame-retardant chemicals in furniture has no idea what comes next.

With no immediate political office waiting in the wings, Leno, 65, will return this fall to San Francisco and the neighborhood small business he started in 1978.

“I’ve never been kicked out of any place in my life,” he said with a quick laugh. “So this is a new phenomenon.”

Leno is in many ways a throwback to a different era. From his crisp shirts and suits to his devotion to decorum, he stands out in a political environment where the goal is often to dominate rather than legislate. Never one to hide his identity as a gay man and an unabashed liberal, he has won admirers in both parties.

In June, after he presented his final state spending plan as budget chairman, the entire Senate rose for a long and loud ovation. As many Republicans as Democrats praised him.

Leno’s penchant for civility has not faded even when fiercely advocating for a cause that inflames passions under the Capitol dome.

“He’s not afraid to have a fight,” said Democrat Darrell Steinberg, the former president pro tem of the state Senate. “But he has the rare ability to fight while also maintaining a grace about himself, and an intellect to go with it.”

He's going to face more fights very soon, and so will all the other

Perhaps his most consistent battle has been for the rights of lesbian, gay, bisexual and transgender Californians. Leno, one of the first two openly gay men elected to the Legislature, wrote laws to expand bans on housing and employment discrimination as well as workplace benefits for transgender employees. And perhaps most visibly, he wrote the 2005 bill to legalize same-sex marriages, a bill former Gov. Arnold Schwarzenegger vetoed.

Give me a break!

LGBT "identity" is not a civil right.

Next.

“There is no legislator in the country who has done more to advance LGBT rights than Mark Leno,” said Geoff Kors, a friend and longtime gay rights advocate who is now a city councilman in Palm Springs.

It's time to scale back this intrusion of the government into our daily lives.

euality

Equal rights for all, special privileges for none.

“Mark’s not the person who plays public hardball politics,” Kors said. “He’s the person who talks one-on-one with everyone to make his case.”

That's such a lie.

That skill was probably well-honed as a child.

"I was a skinny little kid who could never have won a physical altercation if I had one,” he said. “You learn how to get along with people when you need to."

Leno was born in Milwaukee, Wis., to first-generation Americans, a family of Eastern European Jews who immigrated to the United States in 1915. He left Milwaukee after high school and headed for New York City and the chance to freely live his life as a gay man.

That conflicted with plans to become a rabbi. Leno couldn’t reconcile the chaste world of religious leadership with the liberated nightlife provided by Manhattan in the 1970s. He admits he had “no aspirations” once rabbinical school faded away. And after a series of odd jobs, including a brief stint as an office assistant to singer Art Garfunkel (they coincidentally met on an airplane), his youngest sister suggested he move west to San Francisco.

It was not an easy transition, but he made up for it with enthusiasm. A small loan led him to open a sign-printing store, and the business’ success gave him entry into volunteering in local politics.

John Whitehurst, his campaign manager for legislative races in 2002 and 2008, said the story of Leno’s arrival in San Francisco has uncanny parallels to that of the late Harvey Milk, another gay man who left New York to open a small business in San Francisco and then launched a historic career in politics.

Harvey Milk was a pedophile. Does anyone really want to be equated with that creep?!

Leno never got to meet Milk before the activist’s assassination in 1978. But he later occupied the same seat on the San Francisco Board of Supervisors and wrote the 2009 law that created an annual Harvey Milk Day in the state. Photos of the slain leader adorn Leno’s office.

Bleaugh!

Mark Leno (Credit: Vapoteurs)


“What I attribute to Harvey was a burning desire to break a glass ceiling,” Leno said. “Who he was, and the symbol he has become, was a great motivator.”

So, Leno is claiming to be a woman now? HUH?!

He was elected to the Assembly in 2002 and arrived in Sacramento with hopes of leading a powerful legislative committee. His assignment, chair of the Assembly’s public safety committee, included killing crime and punishment bills that Democrats didn’t like. In 2006, he tried instead to reach across the aisle and collaborate on one of those bills.

It came close to costing him his political career.

Leno huddled with Republican lawmakers for weeks with the hope that he could stave off a statewide ballot measure cracking down on sex offenders, believing the Legislature could craft a better version.

But a dispute over punishment for child pornography left him in the uncomfortable position of trying to negotiate an acceptable number of explicit photos on a person’s computer hard drive — a discussion that began only by his worry that an unintentional download could unfairly send someone to prison.

With what he believed to be a bipartisan deal in hand, Leno brought the bill up for a vote. Democrats, trusting his lead, voted yes. Republicans surprised him by refusing to vote. It was a painful lesson.

“Sometimes, it’s not about solving a problem. It’s about making a point,” he said. “It turned out they only wanted to go to the ballot,” a measure that became Proposition 83, known as “Jessica’s Law.”

Oh, that's right--the Big Bad Republicans are all wheeling and dealing, backstabbing and handwringing ...

How about all the crap that the Democrats have been doing to schools, to parents, to teachers, to businesses, to workers, to everyone?

It then got worse. A press release from the California Republican Party castigated him for approving of “child porn,” and rivals in San Francisco whispered the same messages when he announced he would run against a fellow Democrat, then-state Sen. Carole Migden, in 2008.

Luckily for Leno, his political strengths were too much for Migden. And the Senate seat he won came with perhaps the biggest assignment of all, chairing the powerful budget committee. It put him face-to-face with Schwarzenegger, with whom Leno sparred on several issues.

Who forget the epic trolling when Schwarzenegger vetoed the port of San Francisco appropriations bill?

Even now, the affable Leno rarely passes on an opportunity to excoriate the record of the former governor. Leno often points out Schwarzenegger’s 2003 campaign to rescind the recession-sparked increase in the state’s vehicle license fee. It blew a multibillion-dollar hole in the state budget, and Leno said the ensuing fights with Schwarzenegger and Republicans over budget crises often left him “frustrated and angry and sad.”

But it rarely showed in public, as Leno said he always tries to “choose my words, and choose my actions, as careful as I can.”

Others saw it as an affirmation of character.

"You get what you give,” said Steinberg, “and he gets a lot of respect because he gives a lot of respect."

Through the years, Leno was able to give more of himself to his legislative career than might have others who balanced work with family. It was not by choice. His partner, Douglas Jackson, died of complications from HIV in 1990. Jackson was memorialized in the early years of the national AIDS memorial quilt. A replica of his quilt panel hangs as a poignant reminder in Leno’s San Francisco office.

There's another lesson here: don't mess with biology.

“People were dying everywhere, so I was not alone in my grief,” Leno said. In the years since, he said he has remained single. “I've had the opportunity to put my entire being into public service.”

Celibate is the only way of one chooses to identify as gay.

Whether that public service continues isn’t clear. Leno admits he doesn’t know what he wants to do next. There have been thoughts of a campaign for mayor of San Francisco, which wouldn’t be until 2019 at the earliest. Others think he would be ideal in Congress, should House Minority Leader Nancy Pelosi decide in the near future to retire.

What did I say? Well, what did I say?

“He’s really a political dragon slayer,” Whitehurst said. “He would be hard to beat.”

Last month, Leno hinted in a San Francisco public radio interview that he might be willing to help lead a 2018 ballot measure campaign to force changes in police accountability laws that failed this summer at the state Capitol. "They cannot do their work without trust from the communities they serve,” he said.

Whatever path he chooses, observers believe Leno will always take the high road in an era where few others seem to follow.

“It’s not partisanship that’s the enemy, it’s temperament,” Steinberg said. Leno “is an example of how you can have fierce disagreements but can combine that with collegial, collaborative politics.”

“No matter who replaces him,” Kors said, “Mark’s departure from the Legislature is going to leave a tremendous gap.”

No it won't.

Final Reflection

I do not care how nice someone may appear in public.

If they craft bad legislation which harms our rights, they are doing evil deeds.

Mark Leno was full of them.

And full of it.

I am glad that he is gone.

I fear whatever incarnation of regressive leftism will take his place, but let's hope that Republicans start getting their act together and take back the state house ASAP!


Clinton Half-Brother Locked UP in the South Bay (When Will They Lock Her Up?!)

Hillary Clinton is in trouble with the law.

She thinks that she is above the law.

The media is crumbling, and hard-core conservatives are exposing her without any reservations.

Of course, lawlessness runs in the Clinton family.

Her brother-in-law was caught drunk-driving, again!

The story seemed to blip then dip away.

The Daily Breeze reported:

Roger Clinton, former president’s half-brother, to be charged with DUI for Redondo Beach arrest, says prosecutor.

Roger Clinton, the half-brother of former President Bill Clinton and brother-in-law to Democratic presidential candidate Hillary Clinton, will be charged next week with driving under the influence in Redondo Beach last month, a prosecutor said Thursday.

Clinton, 59, who is out on bail following his June 5 arrest, will face charges that could send him to county jail for six months with fines of $390 to $1,000, along with a mandatory 48 hours in county jail for refusing to take a chemical test, Redondo Beach City Prosecutor Melanie Chavira said.

At least one Clinton is heading for jail.



But I want them to "Lock Her Up!"

ABOVE LEGAL DRIVING LIMIT

Clinton is scheduled for arraignment Sept. 2 in Torrance Superior Court on charges of driving while impaired, driving with a blood-alcohol level above the legal limit for driving (0.08) and failure to complete a chemical test.

That was yesterday.

He does not have to appear in court because the charges are misdemeanors. His attorney, Walter Wiggins Jr., can represent him.

Of course Roger won't appear in court. That would hurt the credibility of his sister-in-law.

Of course, what credibility does she have left?

“Given the filing of formal charges against Roger Clinton related to allegations of DUI, we look forward to working amicably with the city prosecutor in an effort to assess the evidence and arrive at a fair resolution of the matter,” Wiggins said in an email.

There is more justice in the South Bay for prosecuting Roger Clinton than for taking down Crooked Hillary!

Clinton was arrested about 7:20 p.m. June 5 after a concerned citizen called the Redondo Beach Police Department to report a possible drunken driver headed south in an erratic manner on Pacific Coast Highway, police said.

We have reporters all over the country exposing Crooked Hillary.

She has health problems.

She has ethical problems.

She has criminal problems.

She is a pathological liar.

When are we going to her "Lock Her Up!"

The caller followed the vehicle and provided updates. Officers caught up to the car and pulled it over near Torrance Boulevard and Prospect Avenue.

Roger Clinton was evaluated for driving under the influence of alcohol, which included field sobriety tests, and was arrested. His passengers were released.

Chavira said he took a “preliminary alcohol screening” test in the field, blowing into a device to measure his level. She did not reveal the result.

“It is well over the legal limit,” Chavira said.

Once at the Redondo Beach police station, Clinton refused to take a Breathalyzer test or submit to blood or urine tests, Chavira said.

Chavira said the paperwork on Clinton’s charges will be filed next week in Torrance.
Clinton, wearing a blue Los Angeles Clippers T-shirt and shorts, was released about 10 the next morning on $15,000 bail. He and his attorney dodged media as they left the station.

Roger dodges the media. So does Crooked Hillary!

Roger Clinton has lived in the South Bay for decades, first in Redondo Beach and then Torrance. Voter registration records show he now lives in Lomita.

Wow. A drifter!

Former President Clinton has occasionally visited the schools of Roger Clinton’s son. In May, the former president spoke at Tyler Clinton’s commencement at Loyola Marymount University in Westchester. Hillary Clinton also attended.

Ugh!

Roger Clinton was previously arrested on suspicion of drunken driving in Hermosa Beach in 2001, when he registered a blood-alcohol level of 0.08 or 0.09. Police said he was driving on the wrong side of the road and bumping curbs. Clinton ultimately pleaded no contest to a charge of reckless driving. He was sentenced to 24 months probation, ordered to perform 113 hours of community service and pay a $200 fine.

Locked him up? Now lock her up!

Chavira said the prior conviction cannot play a role in strengthening the penalties in his new case because it occurred more than 10 years ago.

Before he left office in 2001, President Clinton pardoned his brother for a drug conviction years earlier.

Corruption runs deep in the Clinton family. What is it with these people? They can't play by a few simple rules? Do not drink then drive. Not that complicated.

Final Reflection

I remember when Bill Clinton spoke at the Commencement for Roger Clinton's son at Redondo Union High School.

He had "soiled" the Presidency, and now he was soiling the commencement event for this young student.

Give me a break.

But of course, the Clintons are to corrupt what fish are to water, and the lack of self-control, coupled with easy money and political connections have all made it acceptable for them to keep breaking the law, then get bailed out of jail and go on a crime spree once again.

Roger Clinton lived in Torrance (probably in the Riviera region), then Redondo Beach, and finally Lomita.

It sounds like he has moved on down.

Going from Torrance to Lomita? Has he run out of money? Have the other Clintons gotten tired of bailing him out for his bad behavior?

Maybe they're holding onto their money because they are going to be facing legal challenges and costs of their own very soon.



Lock her up!

The South Bay is a moving-and-shaking region for national politics, after all. Our region has had many swing seats, close races, and deciding factors for the entire state.

David Hadley, our current assemblyman, is the Number One Target for the Democratic Party.

It will be a deciding factor once again if the Democrats restore their supermajority, or Republicans take back the power from the corrupt special interests taking hard-working residents into poverty or flight.

Hillary Clinton is struggling in the national polls.

Will she find herself working hard to hold onto California, too?

In her mind, she can't afford to lose this race, because with President Trump in the White House, he will make sure to

LOCK HER UP!

Egypt's Christians Face Fewer Restrictions on Building Churches

Are Egyptian Christians facing fewer restrictions to practicing their faith?

Egypt is the most populous Arab country in the Middle East.

Of the 90 million people who live there, 9 million are Christians.

They face unprecedented persecution in their country, although they had enjoyed more protection under the rule of Hosni Mubarak.

When the Muslim Brotherhood and Mohammad Morsi took power, Islamic extremism reigned and threatened Egyptian Christians. I have heard terrible stories where local leaders will not stand up to aggressive and abusive Islamic militants.

These extremists take land, property, money, from Christians, and the local authorities do nothing.

This is outrageous!

Hopefully, these news laws will help the Christian community to flourish in Egypt.




Egypt’s parliament approved a new church-building law this week, relieving the nearly insurmountable requirements—some set by the Ottoman Caliphate in 1856—that Christians had to meet before constructing a church.

Whatever happened to religious liberty? 

In Islamic countries like Egypt, tolerance is just a four letter word with little meaning.

Thankfully, General Abdel Fattah el-Sisi has taken charge and is standing up to Islamic extremism.

He has uestioned Muslim theologians and told them plainly "Islam has a problem!".

Along with asking the president and local Muslims for permission, Christians couldn’t build near mosques, schools, village canals, railways, government offices, government facilities, or between residential areas.

What is it about Christians that bothers people?

The Muslim faith demands violence and hatred toward those who do not submit to Allah. They are the ones who should be quarantined, then, and not the peaceful Christian minority.

The bill, which gained the two-thirds majority it needed for approval, still places more restrictions on building churches than on building mosques. But several Coptic MPs said it was “a step in the right direction,” according to Ahram Online.

Any step towards freedom and equity is a step in the right direction. Always.

No, there should be no restrictions on building churches. How about a restriction on building mosques? Or how about ending the untrammeled hatred of Jews and Christians?

The 13-article law allows provincial governors—instead of the president—to approve church building or restoration permits, and requires a decision from them within four months of an application. The law also limits church size to the number of Christians in the area, but states that population growth must be taken into account.

Let us pray that there will be more Christians who come out and pray in Egypt.

A parliamentary report said the law’s clearly laid out procedures will make church construction easier to achieve. The report also commended a provision allowing unregistered churches to operate freely until a government committee can determine whether they are structurally sound and, if so, retroactively grant them a license to operate.

Fair enough. Perhaps governors will recognize that Christians and their beliefs are a sound investment for this country.

I have studied Egyptian history, and I learned about the culture during a course I took in Los Angeles. No one made mention of the horrific inequality forced upon Christians. The course spent more time playing apologist for the Palestinian state and the pro-Islamic, anti-Semitic propaganda.

The law met the main requirements—the authorization of unlicensed churches and the ability to put crosses on church domes—of Orthodox, Catholic, and Coptic church leaders and gained their approval. But not everyone was happy with the outcome.

There are critics of the law, as there should be. Truth and honor for the Christian community of Egypt should not stop with easing the restrictions and regulations on churches.

“Article I defines a church as a ‘walled stand-alone building,’ a condition which cannot be met in many villages,” said one anonymous source, which World Watch Monitor translated from Arabic website DotEgypt. “Article II makes the area of a proposed church contingent on ‘the need and number’ of local Christians. Who decides that Christians need or do not need a church in any given locality? As for ‘numbers,’ they’ve always been contested, as the State inexplicably refuses to put a number to the Christian population.”

These are worthy remarks. Churches should not be decided solely by bureaucrats and their entanglements. Corruption remains a huge problem in Egypt, too.



The success of the law depends on the good intentions of governors and other state officials, Coptic Orthodox Church bishop Makarios told Reuters.

Rafik Greish, a spokesman for the Coptic Catholic Church, called it “a massive jump after 160 years of legislation governing church building and renovation.”

Final Reflection

This is an interesting move.

No, the reforms are not enough.

But any steps toward freedom and protection for the Christian minority in Egypt is a win.

I wonder what else it will take for these countries to realize that persecuting a blessed minority, Christians who bring peace and prosperity to their communities -- is not a good idea.

Muslim countries will not survive based on their ideological extremism.

There is no civilization without civility, and any religion which teaches its adherents to kill those who do not adhere to their own dictates cannot be counted as civil.

Let's continue to pray for the Egyptian Christians, that they will not be afraid to step out in faith, knowing that because God is for them, it does not matter who is against them! (Romans 8:37)

Friday, September 2, 2016

Loony "Whoop-Whoop" Loretta Sanchez Needs Republicans to Stay Relevant

Now this is really sad.

The underdog Democratic candidate for U.S. Senate is trolling for Republican support in California.

Perhaps there is some hope for the GOP to be relevant in a statewide office again, but not just as a marginal king-maker.

Loretta Sanchez, or Little Whoop-Whoop, is raising some money, and lots of media endorsements.

But Korrupt Kammy pretty much has this race sewn up in her favor.

From the Los Angeles Times:

Hurting for support in her own party, Rep. Loretta Sancheztilts her Senate campaign to the right

Orange County Rep. Loretta Sanchez’s U.S. Senate campaign has swerved away from the left side of the road in recent weeks.

Oh, would that both candidates swerved from the extreme left-wing insanity.

The Democratic congresswoman popped up on a conservative talk radio show in San Diego to tout her record against “Islamic extremists.” She ventured to Shasta Lake, Northern California’s Republican frontier populated by farmers and ranchers, and promised to listen to all sides to address the state’s water crisis. And on Thursday, Sanchez will chat with U.S. Marines at Camp Pendleton, where she will be joined by Vista Republican Rep. Darrell Issa, who once called President Obama “one of the most corrupt presidents in modern times.”

She promised to listen to all sides.

Isn't that nice? The same way the state senator Steve Glazer promised to be a moderate voice of reason in Sacramento, yet has continued voting left time and again.

In California’s historic Democrat-versus-Democrat U.S. Senate race, those events and a string of others offer clear signs of Sanchez’s effort to court the fertile field of Republicans, independents and moderates who feel disenfranchised with two Democrats on the Senate ballot.

The answer to this disenfranchisement is to have a Democrat and a Republican in the Top Two!

But whether Sanchez can attract enough support across the political spectrum to overcome opponent state Atty. Gen. Kamala Harris’ substantial advantages in fundraising, among Democratic Party leadership and in the polls, especially among California’s registered Democrats, remains in doubt.

I have a ready-made answer for this:



A Field poll in early July found that 39% of likely voters supported Harris, compared with 24% for Sanchez. Harris had the support of nearly half of likely Democratic voters.

That same poll, however, found that 56% of Republicans and 41% of independents and voters in other parties were undecided or didn’t support either candidate. It’s that group of untethered California voters that offers Sanchez a glimmer of hope in November, if she can win them over.

Count me in that category at this time. I cannot see myself pulling the lever for either candidate.

Sadly, I am not seeing the Dem v. Dem money drain which pragmatic Republicans had predicted. Democrats are machine animals, and they understand the necessity of lining up behind one candidate to discourage rival candidates and fundraising.

Seizing on a potential opportunity to broaden her base of support, Sanchez has cast her front-runner rival as the “totally to the left” darling of the San Francisco-based California Democratic establishment, a message similar to that pushed by Republicans in the primary.

Sorry, Loretta, but you are as establishment as it gets, too!

Can Republicans use this divide to their advantage though, as Sanchez still votes in the House of Representatives?

But to win, Sanchez still needs strong backing from Latinos and a decent share of Democrats, which could make her path to victory challenging.

She has more Latinos than a Democratic pollster for Korrupt Kammy can laugh at. She has all the media endorsements one could covet, too.

And still Kammy rises.

“It’s not like she’s going to suddenly become something she’s not,” said Bill Carrick, Sanchez’s political consultant. “But a lot of what is in her record is what Republicans like: national security experience, homeland security experience. There’s plenty of Republicans who like the fact that she voted against the war in Iraq. There are a lot of Republicans who like the fact that she voted against the Wall Street bailout.”

Yes, that's nice. She voted against Big Bank ballots.

It's an entirely different story what she will do when she sits in the U.S. Senate, where liberalism and government-centered centrism takes hold.

Former San Diego City Councilman Carl DeMaio, who hosts a conservative radio talk show on KOGO-AM in San Diego, had Sanchez on as a guest last week and talked about the dilemma that he and his Republican listeners face in a Senate election between two Democrats.

Carl DeMaio doesn't not like Loretta? Whoop-Whoop. This is the same openly gay liberal Republican who got crushed in a winnable race in 2014, in large part because conservatives would not vote for a liberal who was determined to upend the party platform on ... just about every issue imaginable.

“I’m not sold on you at this point, but I can tell you right now I’m definitely urging a ‘no’ vote on Harris,” DeMaio said.

“If you don’t vote, then Ms. Harris and her party establishment will win,” Sanchez replied.

The party establishment already won June 7th, with two Democrats sweeping the Top Two.

Someone, make the hurting stop!

This summer, the Sanchez campaign boasted about endorsements from two prominent Southern California Republicans: former Los Angeles Mayor Richard Riordan and former Rep. Howard "Buck" McKeon of Santa Clarita. Riordan has called Harris a “crazy liberal” and McKeon, the former chairman of the House Armed Services Committee, praised Sanchez for supporting policies that protect “our troops and the homeland.”

Richard Riordan embraces everybody, and fewer people seem to care.

Buck McKeon? Outside of the Santa Clarita region, this Republican is hardly "prominent".

Conservative radio host Hugh Hewitt endorsed Sanchez when he interviewed her in July and later tweeted: “That was a 1st in my 16 years of a national radio show: I endorsed a Democrat 4 US Senate: @Loretta2016: an old friend + far better of 2 Ds.”

Why not go for 3-D? At least it would be life-like, right?

None of the major Republican opponents from the June Senate primary have endorsed either Democrat, and most declined to reveal who might get their vote.

Former GOP candidate Tom Del Beccaro doesn’t plan to vote, a protest, he said, of 2010’s Proposition 14, which gave California the “top two” primary.

The congresswoman was also endorsed last week by the National Assn. of Women Business Owners and addressed the Los Angeles Chamber of Commerce on Tuesday.

On Thursday Sanchez is scheduled to join Republican congressmen Issa and Mike Turner of Ohio, as well as Rep. Scott Peters (D-San Diego), at a meeting with troops at Camp Pendleton. Issa’s district includes the U.S. Marine base, and Sanchez, Turner and Peters are members of the House Armed Services Committee.

Sitting on a military committee does not make a person pro-military. Democrats do this kind of thing all the time. Democratic leadership will place Congressional reps on odd committees often times because they want to punish that member.

How does that make you feel, Loretta?!

The event provides Sanchez with an opportunity to put her expertise on defense and national security issues on full display, a background she says makes her the most qualified Senate candidate on the ballot.

Still, Sanchez has struggled to raise campaign funds, and two independent campaign committees formed to catapult her campaign — one backed by Republicans and the other by moderates — don’t appear to be faring any better.



Some Republican political consultants told The Times that business groups and conservatives have looked at reaching out to the Sanchez campaign, worried about Harris’ liberal leanings and her possible bright future in Washington.

Sachez has liberal leanings, too.

Do conservative groups really believe that Sanchez won't drift with the insane Democratic caucus in Washington DC? C'mon, wake up!

Marty Wilson, who managed Republican Carly Fiorina’s 2010 Senate campaign against Sen. Barbara Boxer, said he’s taken part in some “casual conversations” with conservative-leaning organizations in Washington about the Sanchez-Harris race. Wilson, who now works for the California Chamber of Commerce, cautioned that it would take about $15 million to have an effect on the race, and in the end a Democrat would still go to Washington.

Exactly. Why waste $15 million on the U.S. Senate race? How about diverting the money to ensure the re-election of David Hadley? Young Kim? Eric Linder? Marc Steinorth?

Scott Wilk and Ling Ling Chang to the state senate?

And so on?

President Obama, Gov. Jerry Brown and the California Democratic Party have all endorsed Harris, adding an air of inevitability to her campaign in left-leaning California. Former New York City Mayor Michael Bloomberg recently hosted a Manhattan fundraiser for Harris that will likely add to her financial edge in the race.

Gun-grabbing Nanny-State Bloomberg has gotten involved. He has decided other Dem v. Dem contests in the past.

Sorry, Loretta. If you don't like Barettas, and Bloomberg doesn't like you, then two constituencies are throwing you out.

As of June 30, Harris had a 3-1 advantage over Sanchez in fundraising, and $2.7 million still in the bank compared to Sanchez’s $919,000.

The Harris campaign also has tailored its message to appeal to a broad spectrum of California voters. She has emphasized her accomplishments as the state’s top law enforcement officer, touting her work helping to broker a $25-billion nationwide settlement deal with the nation’s five largest mortgage institutions for improper foreclosure practices during the housing market crash. Harris will address the Los Angeles Chamber of Commerce in October.

What? Kammy has no appeal. Just lots of money.

On DeMaio’s radio show, Sanchez told listeners that, while she has a strong Democratic record, she also has a reputation for working across the aisle and has acquired expertise on national defense and homeland security issues that she said her rival in the Senate race sorely lacks.

Sanchez also did not back down from her comments last December that 5% to 20% of Muslims support a caliphate — a strict Islamic state — a comment criticized by Muslim groups.

I wish that she had backed down and let a Republican enter the Top Two.

“I think when people take a look at me on the issues, they will realize I have the courage to confront and speak out against the threat of Islamic extremists,” Sanchez said. “I have a common-sense approach to gun control that respects the basic human right of self defense — Second Amendment rights.  I’m strong on veterans’ issues, I’m strong on national defense, on counterterrorism, on homeland security.”

She doesn't have courage. She's just crazy. Two very different things.

Very different. Whoop-whoop.

Not surprisingly, the Harris campaign took notice.

“The vast majority of Californians, regardless of party, will be disheartened to hear the congresswoman once again use divisive rhetoric against Muslims and tout her record giving special protections to gun makers and the NRA,” said Nathan Click, spokesman for the Harris campaign. “Kamala's campaign is about uniting Californians to address the challenges our nation faces and to stand up to the corrosive rhetoric we are seeing in our politics."

Kammy is corrupt, creepy, racist, elitists, and just plain sucks.

With Kammy gone, at least we won't have to deal with her progressive perversions here in California anymore.

As for Loretta Sanchez, it's nice to see Republicans in California having some relevance again.

Some.

Whoop.

Christians: Stop Acting Like Lambs to the Slaughter!

California politics has taken over the national headlines this past week. Why shouldn’t it? What happens in the Golden State (or Commmie-fornia, or the Gilded State, or the Land of Fruity Nuts) does not stay here.

The latest iteration of liberal insanity? State Senator Ricardo Lara (D-Bell Gardens) and his anti-liberty legislation SB 1146.

1. Publish wide disclaimers that they were claiming exemptions from Title IX of the Civil Rights Act. That’s called “Public shaming.”

2. Report to the state of California whenever they expelled a student for violating those codes. That’s called “Setting yourself up for Alinskyite left-wing LGBT harassment.”

3. Limit the extent of the exemptions to religious instructions and vocations. What does that mean? “Unless you are studying to be a priest or pastor at a Christian college, you must learn and accept and embrace the left-wing distortions about marriage, family, gender, and sexuality.”

Now, a word about how outrageously stupid, as well as offensive and evil, this piece of legislation was—and still is.



Lara’s SB 1146 (Stupid Bigotry) would have effectively shut down Christian colleges, punishing them for enforcing their moral codes of conduct.

Gee, A Bible College—you’d think that applicants to these institutions would realize that their code of ethics and behavior would conform with … the Bible!  Similar expectations exist in many institutions. Two people dating are generally not allowed to work in the same departments of the same grocery store, for example. You don’t like a Christian colleges Biblical injunctions about having sex with the same sex, or trying to be a gender you were not born into? Don’t enroll there! No one is forcing you to!

And yet, by taking the sob story of an expelled student who outed himself—but had enrolled as straight---Lara hoped to advance the homosexual agenda.

So, what happened? Religious groups and grassroots activists (including California MassResistance) drove the corrupt, elitist, out-of touch sack of political greed to distraction. He felt the heat, saw the light, and removed the most officious part of the bill.

But just like the Left loves to do, Lara the “gay Hispanic” wanted to make a tear-jerker sympathy plea, and smear the “big bad” Christians like intolerant, homophobic bullies.

Apparently, the state senator with his head up his …. wasn’t paying attention to the First Baptist Church of Orlando, which reached out to the victims and families of the horrific “Pulse” shooting. Some of the homosexual friends and colleges of those victims have converted to Christ … and ditched their same-sex partners. Who says that people don’t change for the better?

Now, back to Lara and his LGBT entourage of bullies.

Yes, the state senator backed off, but the Christian colleges and religious groups have backed off even more. They won’t double-down and demand the full removal of SB 1146. They are content to sign off on the first two parts of the legislation, which are still bad.

Lesson in effective lobby, demonstration, and activism: don’t settle for a less bad bill. Kill it.
And yet, the congregation of California Christian colleges are acting like a bunch of meek and mild sheep lead to the slaughter.

They keep seeing themselves through the eyes of their oppressors, as if they have to prove that their not haters. How did this “blame yourself first” work out for the Israelites before the Promised Land? They wandered for forty years, until the next generation stepped up and “possessed their possessions” (Obadiah 1: 17). How did “blame yourself” work for America? One term of Jimmy Carter, and two terms of Barack.

Listen, Christians (including Christian colleges): stop seeing yourselves as the perpetual victims who are supposed to turn your cheek every time someone does something mean to you.



Haven’t you read Romans 8:37, and that verse right before it?

“As it is written, For thy sake we are killed all the day long; we are accounted as sheep for the slaughter.”

The above passage Paul the apostle quotes from Psalm 44:22, where the Psalmist complained that God was not watching out for His people.

Even then, that sentiment is not true.

Now look at Paul’s next verse:

“Nay …”
A lot of Christians miss that word “Nay”. It means “No way, you are not called to be a meek little lamb that gets eaten up by the evil wolves in this world.” And it does not mean: “Settle for abortive compromises from the secular, arrogant, anti-God, anti-Christ Left which is only interested in the slow yet steady erosion of your rights.”

Sadly, the sheepish Christian colleges in California are doing that. They forced Lara to back off the third demand in his bill, but they are choosing to be lock up, to be chopped up later. They weren’t paying attention, obviously, when Lara promised to bring back that third element next year, “When I win re-election.”

How arrogant can one get!



Christians need to read the rest of Romans 8:37:

“In all these things we are more than conquerors through him that loved us.”

Christians in the fight for life and liberty, for faith and family are not acting like the winners that God made them to be in Christ.

They are giving into the culture rather than standing up to it!

Christians—and conservatives in general: remember what another Christian did, a seemingly quiet woman who wasn’t out to make a fuss. When an arrogant bus driver told her to move to the back of the bus, she stayed seated, and refused to budge. Her courage ignited a movement. Her example should inspire us.



Listen, Christians: Jesus paid for you to have victory in life (Romans 5:17), so stop capitulating under self-imposed defeat. The founders—and Founder—paid too dear a price. California’s Christian colleges are wrong to settle. We cannot compromise in the fight for liberty. California MassResistance won’t stop fighting until SB 1146 is dead. Conservatives in general must learn from this setback, then lean in, step forward, and fight back.


Thursday, September 1, 2016

Democratic Chances of Retaking the U.S. Senate? A Weak 56%

As soon as Election 2014 was over, I looked over the minefield of obstacles facing the U.S. Senate Republican Majority.

They would have more seats to defend in 2016, no uestion about it.

The Republicans gained six seats in 2010 through the Tea Party Wave!

A number of seats were in swing states, swing districts.

But for greater intents and purposes, I predicted a GOP hold.

Republicans can lose three seats if they do not win the White House, or they can lose four if the Republican becomes President.

Complicating matters a little bit for Democrats?

Senate Minority Leader Harry Reid is retiring at long lost.



Congressman Joe Heck has been running a strong, active campaign against Reid's hand-picked successor. The race is neck-and-neck, but the right upswing helping the Republican ticket in a state where Republicans hold the legislative trifecta, and where Democrats are in growing disarray, will help Heck a heck of a lot.

So, Republicans can lose four seats if they gain Nevada, or five if they also gain the White House.

Current research, coming from the liberal, pro-Hillary rag the New York Times is not giving the Democratic Party the brightest of forecasts, either.

U.S. Senator Elizabeth Warren, writing for MoveOn.org, shared the following:

The New York Times says that we have a 56% chance of taking back the Senate on Election Day.1 I’d call those roll-up-your-sleeves fighting odds, wouldn’t you?

If you’re ready to roll up your sleeves with me, can you chip in just $2.70 right now to expand MoveOn’s on-the-ground efforts in eight battleground states—including seven with key Senate races we can win?

I submit that 56% is not very good odds, considering that this is a Presidential Election year, and Hillary Clinton was supposed to be a huge draw of new voters to the ballot box on Election Day.



More uber-liberal voters are saying "Never Hillary" as well as "Never Trump", and may never vote.

Democrats who stay home ensure that Republicans stay in the majority.

It's just now September, Election Day is 70 days away, and the Democrats have only a 56% chance of retaking the U.S. Senate?

Hmmm.

California's Christian Colleges Caved: Call Them to Change Their Minds!

California Senate Bill 1146 — the “Kill Christian Colleges” bill — was bad from the outset. The legislation, crafted by the corrupt State Senator Ricardo Lara (D-Bell Gardens), contained the following requirements:



  • Limitations of the Title IX exemptions to only specifically religious instruction
  • Options for liability claims for LGBT students claiming discrimination
  • Removal of CalGrants for colleges which violate the “rights” of LGBT students.
  • Reporting requirements from the colleges for students expelled for violating the moral code of the college
  • Extravagant publishing requirements to inform students of their Title IX exemptions, i.e. public shaming.

The outpouring of outrage was immediate.

Grassroots organizations pushed back against this abusive intrusion of the state.

One state legislator informed me, however, that the  Christian colleges were late in stopping SB 1146, even though they were directly affected, along with their students.

Poor and minority students would have been particularly affected, losing the essential CalGrants for the tuition to these select universities.

Residents, Christians, the Church throughout the state of California hammered legislators with phone calls.

California MassResistance pressed on lawmakers in their offices. State Senator Ricardo Lara received two massive visits to his office. The first time, his staff blew off fifty people, more than half of whom were constituents in his district! The second time, his staffers had to submit and endure the fervent upset of a wide variety of his constituents, from Huntington Park to Long Beach.

Still, the Christian colleges were late to the game. They raised $350,000 to target key assemblymembers, including committee chairs like Lorena Gonzalez of San Diego. The pressure worked. Lawmakers in the state assembly were feeling the heat, and seeing the light.

Contacts working behind the scene informed me and MassResistance President Brian Camenker that a number of legislators were fed up with the constituents calling for an end to the bill. They could not vote for the bill in its full, aberrant, and abhorrent form.

Then a deal was struck.

The Christian colleges would go along with the bill, if the limitations on Title IX were removed, the CalGrants remained available to all students, and the liability options were removed.

The Christian colleges, with all their political power, with the grassroots power growing behind them and fighting for them, backed off. They had the enemies under their feet, they were stepping on their necks. Instead of doubling down and demanding the complete removal of the legislation …

They caved.

They should have memorized those passages in Romans 8: 31-37.

Because of Jesus, God is for us, not against us.

We are not lambs lead to the slaughter, but more than conquerors through Him who loved us.

Instead of fighting all the way, they gave way.

The state assembly appropriations committee passed the bill, with some onerous parts removed. Ricardo Lara was lambasted on major mainstream media outlets up and down the state.

Religious institutions, conservative think-tanks, and right-leaning blogs claimed victory.

Indeed, the success of forcing a radical, regressive homosexual activist to give up key portions of his signature legislation was an accomplishment.



But the Christian colleges needed to continue the fight.

The Left is like the proverbial evil man who cannot sleep on his bed unless he has plotted evil for the next day (Psalm 36:4). They don’t rest. Why should we? “The price for liberty is eternal vigilance.”

The Christians, the conservatives, and the concerned citizens in general did not stop fighting SB 1146.

The bill was brought to the floor of the state assembly. At the third reading, another portion was taken out of the bill. The “mandated reporting” requirement turned out to violate federal privacy laws.

So, SB 1146 turned into a shell of its self, but still carried with it the latent intrusion of the government into the private affairs of Christian colleges. Each institution would have to publish extravagant guidelines and disclaimers outlining to all prospective and currents students, along with staff and administration, the Title IX exemptions claimed by the institutions. This burden amounts to public shaming, an unreasonable demand not expected of other universities!

Lara swore, from the moment that he had to back away from the key provisions of his initial bill, that he would return during the next legislative session to draft and submit a more severe piece of legislation The Christian colleges apparently do not take into account this threat.



Constituents continued their calling, their harping, their demands on the legislature.

Those attacks were working.

On the Assembly floor, SB 1146 initially failed! This bill needed 41 votes to pass, and the first roll call mustered only 33. The bill was put “on call”, and the arm-twisting ensued Eventually, the bill would pass, with only 45 votes, three Democrats voting no, seven Democrats abstaining, and sadly one Republican supporting the bill.

Then off to the state senate.

August 30th, 2016—SB 1146 did not appear on the state senate’s agenda on the floor.

Then at about 6:00pm, Lara drew the bill from an “inactive file”.

Lara read off the amendments, seeking concurrence from his colleagues.

His chief argument? The Christian colleges “now support this bill.”

The same argument had augured the bill to the assembly floor.



Four state senators spoke up in opposition to this bill. FOUR! Their talking points about the legislation were accurate and prescient. Senator Jim Nielsen reminded his colleagues that Lara would bring forward the same officious elements stripped from the bill next year. Senator Ted Gaines urged a No vote. Senator John Moorlach praised the faith community for rising up to stop this bill. Here are Senator Jeff Stone’s comments.

State Senator John Moorlach rises for the First Amendment

SB 1146 passed 25-13. One Democrat abstained.

Now the bill sits on Governor Jerry Brown’s desk, and he will very likely sign it.

The “Christian” colleges supported a bill which would fundamentally undermine their mission and religious liberty in the state of California. Imagine what would have happened if the Christian colleges had stood their ground on principle!


Now, California’s Christians will never know.

Call these California Christian colleges.

Inform them of your disappointment, and demand that they change their minds and urge Governor Brown to veto SB 1146.



Westmont College
President Gale D. Beebe, Ph.D.
805-565-6024
president@westmont.edu

Azusa Pacific
President Jon R. Wallace, DBA
626-812-3075

William Jessup University
President John Jackson Ph.D.
916-577-2210
president@jessup.edu

Association of Independent California Colleges and Universities
President Kristen F. Soares
1121 L Street, Suite 802
916-446-7626
aiccu@aiccu.edu

Southern Baptist Ethics and Religious Liberty Commission
President Russel Moore
Elizabeth Bristow
press@erlc.com

California Catholic Conference
Bishop Jaime Soto – President of the Executive Standing Committee
General phone- 916-313-4000
General email – leginfo@cacatholic.org

Biola University
President Barry H. Corey
Michele Hughes, Executive Assistant
Michele.hughes@biola.edu
562-903-4701

California Baptist University
President Ronald L. Ellis, Ph.D.
Julie Moulton, Administrative Assistant
jmoulton@cabaptist.edu
951-343-4210

Point Loma University
President Bob Brower, Ph.D.
Executive Assistant Myra Fisher
president@pointloma.edu
619-849-2388