Showing posts with label LGBT bigot. Show all posts
Showing posts with label LGBT bigot. Show all posts

Monday, May 15, 2017

Christian Broadcasting Network Mentions California MassResistance

MassResistance is making national news.

Brian Camenker is taking the message of THE pro-family, anti-LGBT movement to Taiwan, a country with only a 5% Christian population, yet one of the strongest pro-family movements yet.

Brian Camenker


It's incredible.

California MassResistance is getting attention, too.



Following an interview that I gave to the LifeSiteNews to Rev, Mark Hodges about private homeschool problems inculcating same-sex parenting into grammar lessons, the Christian Broadcasting Network issued the following:

In an interview with LifeSite News, Arthur Schaper, a writer and a member of California's Mass Resistance, said "The LGBTQ agenda is forcing recognition of same-sex marriage and transgenderism in core courses of our public education system."

and then

Schaper believes this type of strategy to push a liberal message may “backfire.”

"Turning the whole LGBTQ agenda into a set of dry homework assignments will only further de-legitimize the movement."

MassResistance is making a difference, and we are getting people noticing.

We are not afraid to stand up for what is right.

We will not be bullied by LGBT hate.

We will not allow our chidlren and our culture to be undermined by a destrucitve, anti-life, anti-family, anti-God agenda.






Thursday, April 20, 2017

Colorado MassResistance: LGBT Agenda Fights to Lower Age of Consent for Psychiatric Therapy---Without Parental Consent


LGBT movement’s other goal: Lower age of consent to 10 years old for psychiatric therapy – without parents’ knowledge or consent!

Outrageous bill passed House Committee in Colorado Legislature on Tuesday - despite strong testimony by Colorado MassResistance and others. But the fight is just beginning!

Similar laws already passed in states across America.

April 20, 2017

Bill's sponsor testifies at commmittee hearing as pro-LGBT "anti-suicide" activists behind her prepare to testify.[MassResistance photo.]
Fresh from the recent victory stopping the LGBT movement’s “anti-therapy” bill in the Colorado Legislature, pro-family people are up against an equally frightening bill that has been filed and just passed its first hurdle toward becoming law. It’s the latest among similar laws that are being quietly passed across the country.
The LGBT lobby is quietly but forcefully pushing for laws to allow children as young as 10 years old to “decide” they need psychiatric therapy – without their parents’ knowledge or consent. LGBT-allied “therapists” could push vulnerable children to affirm and accept homosexual and transgender “identity” and behaviors as “normal.”
This has terrifying implications for parents and families. Children are emotionally defenseless and can easily be persuaded by adults that they need this “help” from unknown, agenda-driven mental health professionals.
It’s not clear who pays for these services, but it’s assumed that the state funds them. It’s also not clear that parents would be allowed access to the resulting medical records.
To accommodate these laws, many school-based clinics now offer “behavioral health” services. The LGBT movement and Planned Parenthood have long been placing “youth clinics” inside schools to access children away from parental oversight. This past week, a Colorado MassResistance mother called one of the clinics and was told they can arrange a psychiatrist to meet with a child on site at the school.
This scheme dovetails with the other, more public LGBT campaign in state legislatures across America to ban counseling and therapy for children who have unwanted homosexual or transgender feelings – but would allow therapy to affirm homosexuality or transgenderism. Sadly, such a ban would be particularly devastating to children who have been sexually molested.

The scare tactic: “suicide prevention”

To persuade legislators that these laws are necessary, the proponents focus on  “suicide prevention.” They make emotional claims that many young children are suicidal, cannot talk to their parents about it, and unless professional intervention happens the children will kill or horribly injure themselves.
“Suicide prevention” has been a lobbying tactic used by the LGBT movement for decades to push for a wide range of programs and funding. This broad claim has little scientific basis and usually depends on blatantly unscientific school surveys such as the Massachusetts Youth Risk Behavior Survey. But sadly, most legislators are not informed enough to see through that. So too often, it works.
(Of course, it is true that psychological problems are far more prevalent among “LGBT-identifying” children. That’s because these behaviors are usually a symptom of earlier trauma, molestation, or other issues. So while these children may need psychological counseling, it must be done with non-activist professionals and parental oversight.)

California led the way for the radicals

In 2010 California passed the Mental Health Services for At-Risk Youth Act (SB 543), signed by Gov. Schwarzenegger, which lowered the age of consent to 12. The law was heavily lobbied by Equality California and other LGBT groups.
Since then, several states across the US have passed laws lowering the age of consent for outpatient (and inpatient) psychotherapy to various age levels, with various degrees of independence for children and notification of parents in these decisions.

The fight begins in Colorado

On April 5, 2017, Bill HB17-1320 was filed in the Colorado Legislature. It would lower the age of consent for outpatient psychotherapy to 10. (Read the text for the original bill here.) Soon after it was filed, the proponents got nervous and offered an amendment to change the age of consent to 12. But the bill is quite clear about its intent. It immediately went to the Democrat-controlled House Public Health Care & Human Services Committee.

A contentious public hearing

On April 18, the Committee held a public hearing for the bill, followed by a vote of the committee members. It was not an overwhelming turnout like other LGBT-related hearings. About 35 people showed up. All but 5 who testified were supporters of the bill.
Parents from Colorado MassResistance were there to testify.
Interestingly, the LGBT lobby seems to be hiding in the background on this. They sent in individual activists and allies to testify, but they did not give an LGBT affiliation. However, the LGBT movement’s fingerprints were there. It was almost all emotional, often tearful arguments about how they and/or their loved ones personally suffered and went through suicide issues as children because legislation did not exist to help them.
Most of the arguments were non-intellectual, irrational, and emotional. They did not focus on professional medical or legal issues. Much of their testimony was rambling, and didn’t even pertain to the bill. There were a lot of threats of children being suicidal, or at least cutting themselves badly, if they had to rely on their parents to decide for them. One of the sponsors of the bill even testified, and began crying when telling her story about her young son who she said wanted to commit suicide. But it had nothing to do with the intent of the bill. It seemed like they were simply throwing anything they could think of at the legislators to see what would stick.
The pro-family people included MassResistance Colorado and Colorado Family Action (CFA), including two attorneys that CFA brought. The MassResistance Colorado parents testified strongly, point by point against the bill, and how its true intent would horribly subvert parents and give an unknown therapist free latitude to diagnose and “treat” their children with whatever approach they chose, without knowing vital medical history or other information from parents.
The MassResistance Colorado parents also submitted a letter by Dr. Michelle Cretella, President of the American College of Pediatricians, against Bill HB 17-1320. Dr. Cretella strongly advised the legislators that adolescents are not capable of making these kinds of judgments about their mental health and psychological therapy.
The CFA attorneys cited constitutional problems with subverting parental rights, and noted that the door would be opened for lawsuits based on past Supreme Court decisions. As Dr. Cretella also observed, young children, especially those in some emotional distress, have absolutely no competence to consent to psychological treatment.
But more importantly, the attorneys noted that statistically these laws have had virtually no positive effect. In California the child suicide rate has actually increased since their law was passed.
Somewhat shockingly, when one of the parents cited the ideological agenda and special interests behind this bill which clearly seem to override interests and needs of the parents and children, the Committee Chairman said that “impugning the motives” of people would not be allowed in testimony!

Committee barely passes it

When the testimony ended, the Committee passed a few minor amendments, including one that would change the age of consent from 10 to 12. The main sponsor explained that she had meet with “stakeholders” (i.e., activists supporting the bill) and apparently decided that 10 years old was too hard to sell right now. Then the Committee passed the bill 7-6, along party lines.
One of the Democrat committee members, Dan Pabon, didn’t even bother to be there for the testimony; he only came in for the vote, and voted “yes”.
Interestingly, one of the Republican committee members, Lois Landgraf, was a sponsor of the bill. But after hearing the testimony, she changed her mind and voted against it. She told legislators:

“If a suicidal child can’t go to parents, there has to be a solution, and I don’t know what it is, but this isn’t it. This bill was too intrusive into the parent-child relationship, so I removed my sponsorship.”

Another Republican committee member noted that it’s being promoted as a “suicide prevention” bill, but that it’s much far more expansive and broad than that. “It’s really a mental health bill that excludes parents,” he told his fellow legislators.

And the fight continues


The bill now goes to the full House, which could happen any day now.

We believe that this bill can be stopped in the Senate, if it gets there. The problem in other states, we believe, has been not enough, if any, pro-family firepower. But even in Colorado it will take some serious work. The CFA people are already scheduling meetings with Senators, and MassResistance Colorado is also prepared to help.
It’s terrifying that most citizens have no idea these laws are being passed in America to give vulnerable children into the hands of “mental health” activists, quacks, or worse.

Wednesday, September 7, 2016

Autumn Burke Caves to LGBT Hate Machine, Throws Blacks Under the Bus

Assemblywoman Autumn Burke (D-Inglewood)  has done some good in the state assembly.

But her betrayal of the black faith community in Inglewood and throughout the state is just plain inexcusable.

She stood by an abusive chief of staff, who cursed out a pastor on a voicemail, rather than demanding his resignation.

She advanced the militant homosexual agenda instead of standing for all the churches in her district and throughout the state. She abandoned the First Amendment to score a few points with ... who exactly?

She also released an offensive leader demeaning Pastor Marc Little and the black faith community in her district.

Autumn Burke (D-Inglewood)


Here is the text of the letter, and my comments.

"Dear Bishop Ulmer,

'So in everything, do to others what you would have them do to you.' Matthew 5:11

This passage was never an invitation to permit sin.

LGBT behavior is not an identity, and should be treated as a special class.

In the legislature, contention over issues is expected but I am especially disturbed by the recent actions of opponents to Senate Bill 1146. SB 1146 simply calls for more transparency to ensure LGBT students are protected from discrimination in private and religious institutions of higher learning.

We need discrimination in higher education. We need to allow students to learn to discern between right and wrong, good and evil, truth and error. LGBT behavior leads to health and emotional problems. Why are we preventing people from learning the truth about these realities?

What exactly did Autumn Burke find so offensive about constituents confronting her and her staff about this bill, which would place undue burdens on private colleges, exposing them to public shame and potential lawsuits just for practicing their faith?

My integrity and that of my colleagues has been called into question for supporting SB 1146. But what integrity is there in promoting segregation and hostility towards the LGBT community?  Evident in the recent attacks on the LGBT community in Orlando and threats here in California, such hostility contributes to a culture of hate that takes lives. As a black woman and mother, I simply refuse to stand idly by while hate and segregation are encouraged.

On brother. "Segregation"? Now that is offensive. Being born black is not a crime, not a sin, not a destructive behavior. People are born black. People are not born gay. It is not a civil right. One of the most evil (yet politically genius) tactics of the Militant Homosexual movement was to collude and compare the fights for "gay" rights with the struggle of racial minorities in the South.

Outrageous and unbecoming.

Several members of the Faithful Central Bible Church stopped by my office recently to express their concern with SB 1146 and instead of being respectful, they decided to personally attack and question the faith of one of my staffers simply because he is gay. The same group then went to the office of Assemblymember Reggie Jones-Sawyer and started another confrontation by exclaiming, "I don't want my sons and daughters to be taught to be homosexual."

What did they say, exactly? Where does this line of argument come from, which concludes that this staffer or that office employee is "gay"?

All of this identity politics talk is corrosive to our political discourse. We need to stop labeling one another based on our thoughts, feelings, and actions.

Reggie Jones-Sawyer and Chief of Staff Joey Hill


There is just no justification for it.

The chief of staff to Assemblymember Jones-Sawyer subsequently left a voicemail to Paster [sic] Marc Little where he expressed his outrage over the antagonizing manner in which his staff was addressed. I do not agree with the language used, but I do agree with the sentiment that Pastor Marc Little's delegation message is devoid of historical context, respect, and compassion.

Listen to the voicemail, again:



You will notice that in the voice mail there is no mention of a visit from a pastor.

Joey Hill was responding--rather, raging--at the letter left by Pastor Marc Little.

In the 1960s, opponents [of the Civil Rights Movement] used the same argument - that laws intended to protect a certain class were an overreach - in a failed attempt to deny access to voting, housing, and fair employment. During this time, the church community played an integral role in guaranteeing civil rights by serving as a source of unity and empathy.

What laws were protecting a class? No! Martin Luther King Jr. and the Southern Baptist Christian League for natural rights for all men.

They did not march in the streets and refuse to give up their seats so that two men could sleep together, or that two women could "marry", or to protect individuals with mental illnesses to masquerade as a sex that they were not born.

There is no justifiable exception for [not] extending compassion to the LGBT community, many of whom are people of color.

Oh, stop! LGBT is not a community. This lie has to be confronted, and the truth shared with everyone to set people free!

I remain committed to SB 1146 and other efforts that add to the progress we have achieved as a diverse community."

WHAT? Diversity must be based on truth, and should not be focused on limiting individual liberty or community integrity.

SB 1146 is a bad bill. It should never have been introduced.

Senator Lara should be ashamed of himself for suggesting such a terrible policy. His star witness to promote the legislation.

I applaud the efforts of the Religious Freedom Bus Riders for standing up to LGBT bullying in the state legislature. I sincerely hope that more residents in Autumn Burke's district stand up to her cowering and her caving to homosexual/transgender bullying which now threatens all our liberties.



Contact Assemblywoman Autumn Burke's office, and demand that she:

1. Retract the above letter
2. Rescind their support for SB 1146
3. Demand the removal of chief of staff Joey Hill

Capitol Office
State Capitol
P.O. Box 942849
Sacramento, CA 94249-0062
Tel: (916) 319-2062
Fax: (916) 319-2162

District Office:
One West Manchester Blvd.
Suite 601
Inglewood, CA 90301
Tel: (310) 412-6400

Fax: (310) 412-635

Monday, September 5, 2016

Pro-LGBT Assemblyman and Chief of Staff Throw Pro-Family Blacks Under the Bus

California Assemblyman Reginald Jones-Sawyer (D-South Los Angeles) is yet another Democratic machine politician.

Like State Senator Ricardo Lara, he does the bidding of labor unions, big businesses, and other corrupted, left-wing groups in the tarnished Golden State.



These special interests—not concerned with the best interests of the public—include the LGBT lobby, which has been aggressively pushing its anti-morality, anti-biology, anti-reality agenda onto every California.

Ricardo Lara’s destructive bill SB 1146 now sits on Governor Jerry Brown’s desk, waiting for his signature or his veto, along with hundreds of other destructive bills.

California MassResistance hoping, praying, writing and calling to Governor’s office—and the Christian colleges who folded on the watered-down version of this legislation—to reject and object to this legislation.

To our great joy, California MassResistance and Save California have not been the only active elements in the Golden State fight against this blatant, patent pagan bigotry.

Pastor Marc Little of Faithful Central Church in Inglewood, California joined forces with other pastors and churches. They formed a coalition called the “The Religious Freedom Riders,” boarded charter buses up to the state capital, and confronted their legislators on SB 1146.
In particular, Pastor Marc Little explained plainly his opposition to SB 1146, aka “The Kill Christian College” Bill.



Here is a sample of the letter that the Faithful Central pastor shared with legislators:

SB 1146, in its prior form, disproportionately impacted minority student … I take great exception that no one from the Black Caucus or the Appropriations Committee has spoken out to protect the rights of students where more than 16,000 students, many of whom are black and Hispanic students, rely on Cal Grants  …

I could not agree more with Pastor Marc's outrage. It is offensive and ridiculous that leaders in the black and Hispanic communities said nothing about SB 1146 and its discriminatory impact on all students, including young men and women in minority areas.

Additionally, this is an attempt to choose one group, perceived to be discriminated against, over a 300-year history in the U.S. without any demonstrable evidence of any discrimination. Accordingly, the entire effort is a mockery of fairness and legislative integrity. Private institutions can and do provide information to the state already; a state mandate intended to protect a certain class is an overreach.

Yes, and this "protected class" is a socialized fiction which should not receive special protection in the first place. Equal rights for all, special privileges for NONE!

Being black is not a sin, perversion, or a crime, not does it lead to syndemic health problems.
Homosexual behavior and transgenderism are destructive behaviors. We need to love the sinner, but hate the sin.

Your freedom as legislators to be irreligious, in many cases, and our freedom to exercise our faith is a constitutional right and no legislature will take that right away from us without significant challenge now and in the future.

In response to this respectful yet resolute letter, Reggie Jones-Sawyer’s chief of staff Joey Hill (who identifies as homosexual) left a vile, offensive, bigoted voice mail for Pastor Marc.

Here is the video.


Here is the transcript below:

This message is for  'Pastor' Marc Little ...

I have to emphasize the condescension here.

This chief of staff immediately disdains a man of God who preaches God’s word. What kind of a world do we live in where legislative staffers sneer at pastors? Excuse me, but the Body of Christ comes before the legislative body, and the Word of God defines the words in our law books.

This lack of respect is already troubling.

I don't know how you call yourself a pastor after writing his ridiculously hateful letter.

The language of the Left: describe any rhetoric or argument which does not agree with your views as “hateful.”

And you have the nerve to cite history.

You're just either stupid and ignorant or evil.

Wow! A staffer who cannot control his tongue calls a pastor “stupid” and “evil.”

300 year history? What if I made an analogy to slavery? What's wrong with you?

What is going on here? The analogy between African-Americans, the LGBT agenda, and the Civil Rights movement is beyond offensive. The pastor was right to challenge this comparison.

You want to cite Leviticus? Read your Bible over again, man …

This pastor has read his Bible, and believes what he reads. He practiced love and compassion by speaking the truth to power.

And some love in your f------king heart, you f----ing -------.

One F-bomb after another flowed from the mouth of the hateful chief of staff toward the pastor.
Joey Hill is the face of the Big LGBT Hate machine, and how it’s wreaking havoc in the state of California. Whatever happened to the illiberal “Love Trumps Hate” mantra which left-wing partisans love to chant?

Not much love in Reggie Jones-Sawyer’s office.

This abuse is wrong and just plain outrageous. It took the major media markets a week to expose this offensive, curse-laden rant.

I went with another member of California MassResistance to speak with Reggie Jones-Sawyer’s staff at his office near the USC campus. No one answered the door. Two police officers then showed up to try and intimidate us!



So, Reggie Jones-Sawyer has no respect for black pastors or black constituents. He has sworn to the mainstream media that his chief of staff’s conduct was inappropriate, but has not fired him!
Once again, the LGBT agenda justifies prejudice and bigotry against African-Americans, covers for elected officials sending black people to the back of the bus, or just throwing them under the bus.
It’s time for men and women of faith to stand up to LGBT abuse!



Contact Reggie Jones-Sawyer’s office, and demand that he terminate his unprofessional and abusive chief of staff Joey Hill!

Capitol Office:
State Capitol
P.O. Box 942849
Sacramento, CA 94249-0059
Tel: (916) 319-2059
Fax: (916) 319-2159

District Office:
Administrative Offices West
700 Exposition Park Drive
Los Angeles CA 90037
Tel: (213) 744-2111
Fax: (213) 744-2122

Sunday, September 4, 2016

Missouri MassResistance Confronts Arrogant Pro-LGBT School Board Members


Parents signing Freedom of Information Act paperwork and letters to their School Board members, before going off to Board members houses.

Parents around the country: You can learn from this group!

It’s the classic playbook used by school boards pushing a graphic sexuality curriculum. When parents start demanding answers from Board members, they’re told to meet with unelected administrators who are experts at evading, confusing, and marginalizing. And they’re ignored when they testify at Board meetings. Eventually they get beaten down, intimidated, and defeated. We’ve seen this for decades.
But this time it’s not working. The troop of local parents from Missouri MassResistance knows the playbook -- and has a playbook of their own! This “sex-ed” battle is going to be different.

Over 50 parents showed up on Aug. 14 to take action!

Unanswered questions and withheld material

As we’ve reported, the seven-member School Board of the Parkway School District in suburban St. Louis voted in March to implement one of the most radical and graphic LGBT-laced K-12 sexuality programs we’ve seen.
This curriculum was very frightening to many parents. They attended whatever “committee” meetings at the schools the administration had to discuss it. They voiced their concerns in the 3-minute testimonies they’re allowed at School Board meetings. They played by the rules.

But after a few months there were still lot of unanswered questions. How did these explicit and age-inappropriate subjects get selected – especially for the younger grades? Why are these graphic subjects even being taught to children? How would they teach these subjects? Why can’t parents see the teachers’ guides? Why can’t parents see the process the school used to create this curriculum? Why is the curriculum using material from Planned Parenthood and these particular LGBT groups? Exactly what would the “opt out” process be? These and  other questions were dodged or ignored. Moreover, parents received a lot of conflicting information.

The frustration grew. Before long, the parents group had grown to well over a hundred.

Hundreds of parents mailed cards like this to the Superintendent, Dr. Keith Marty. But it got no results. Obviously, the elected Board needed to be involved.

Repeatedly denied a meeting with Board members

Finally, at the beginning of June the parents asked if Board members would meet with a group of them to discuss the curriculum and get the information they seek. The vice-chairman of the Board emailed them back saying that the Board memberswould not meet with them. Instead, the parents were told they must meet with the Superintendent and his staff.

So they went back to that approach. But the Superintendent insisted he would only answer questions via email. But the answers that came back were insufficient and vague, the parents said.

The Superintendent finally agreed to meet with a small group of them -- not the larger group they requested -- on Aug. 2. But that Aug. 2 meeting was basically more obfuscation and disinformation, the parents later said, and was mostly a waste of time.

One shocking thing the parents did find out from the Aug. 2 meeting was that the Superintendent intends to expand this radical agenda to include “transgender” access in all bathrooms and locker rooms throughout the school district. Parents also began to see how the GSA “gay” clubs in each middle and high school feed into the bigger agenda. As the superintendent said that evening, “We know we have at least one identified transgender in every middle and high school in the district.”

So the parents went back to the Board members to ask for a meeting to address their questions. And they continued to get refused. “I have nothing new to share. I’m not going to meet with you,” the vice-chairman blatantly said, according to one parent. Another Board member repeatedly told a parent, “The other side is so loud and angry. You all are only mildly frustrated.”
The unmitigated arrogance of elected officials is alive and well in the “Show me” state!

Parents got the message, so: “OK, we’ll visit you then!”

Most parents start to give up at this point. But not this bunch. They were just getting started!
On August 14, two weeks after the Superintendent meeting, a group of 50 parents met at a Missouri MassResistance parent’s house. They had formally invited the Board members to the meeting also. But none of them came, even though several live fairly close.

At their Aug. 14 meeting, parents got the latest information about the issue from group leaders, signed paperwork and cards under the canopy, and got instructions about more activism that day!

The group leaders were ready for that. The first thing they had parents do was fill out a round of individual FOIA (Freedom of Information Act) paperwork, for the materials that the school was withholding from view. They also had parents write some notes to Board members expressing their outrage at being treated so badly. And after that they looked to the group leaders because they were ready to do more than just that!


One of the cards parents taped to the front doors of all seven Board members houses on Aug. 14 and later that week.

When invited to take the next step, a group of the parents drove to a few of the Board members’ homes. As about 15 stood out on the sidewalk, groups of two would walk up to knock on the door. Parent organizers had prepared them with tape, pre-written notes, and pens so they could sign the notes. When the door wasn’t answered, they would tape their notes to the front door. They made sure to be very polite and identify themselves as constituents if someone came to the door.

A group of about 15 parents stood in the street in front of the first Board member's house as groups of two took turns going to the front door, knocking, and leaving notes if nobody answered.


Notes taped to the front door of the first Board member's house.
The first Board member eventually came to the door, yelled at them to “go away,” and called the police. (The police saw nothing illegal, and left the parents alone.)
Next they went to the Board member vice-chairman’s house. He came right to the door, was very angry, and said, “This is distasteful. You need to go away,” and shut the door. So they taped the notes to the door and left.

A parent leaves the house of the vice-chairman of the Board after he came to the door and yelled at her.
After that, it was too dark to go to any more houses. By then, the other Board members had been told what was happening and most were seething about it. They even had police waiting at their house – in case any more of their constituents came by! Over the following week, several other parents came during the day and left notes on ALL Board members’ front doors – just to drive the point home some more.

Getting that angry at polite constituents reveals that these Board members know they’re in the wrong, and just want it to go away. But of course, that’s not going to happen. Our prediction: If the parents keep pushing hard, they can eventually win this.

If you can’t stand the heat . . .


Parkway School District is a fairly affluent, relatively conservative area, where the people are pretty low-key and not prone to confrontations.  But there’s something about arrogant elected officials who refuse to meet with constituents over something as horrific as this, that gets peoples’ blood moving.

At this point, parents are no longer interested in whether their elected officials are getting upset. They’re upset. No one forced these Board members to run for office. As Missouri native Harry Truman said, “If you can’t stand the heat, get out of the kitchen.”  And the parents aren’t being intimidated or defeated by the tired old left-wing tactics.

In fact several parents have said, "The more you try to discourage one of us, five more parents pop up ready to engage." These parents started out like so many do: Believing that their school principals and upper administration had their children's best in mind. As they've engaged, they've seen what’s really happening, matured, and become bolder.

In some ways, these School Board members are lucky. In Revolutionary War times, public officials got tarred and feathered for a lot less. 


This Aug. 14 episode isn’t all there is to report! Part 3 is of this series is coming up.

Missouri MassResistance: Show Me States Shows Us How to Fight LGBT Bullying

Keeping up the pressure. Parents at Aug. 3 School Board meeting demanding the resignation of Dr. Keith Marty, the Superintendent and the force behind the sex-ed program, unless the Board agrees to re-vote on it.

Our latest chapter, Missouri MassResistance, based in suburban St. Louis, is fighting back in a local school district like nothing anyone there has seen before! Hundreds of parents have already gotten involved. As soon as parents open up the sex-ed materials, they gasp in horror.

They are confronting something we are seeing across the United States. Local school boards are covertly working with LGBT groups and Planned Parenthood to impose a new, more radical and graphic “comprehensive sexuality” curriculum in grades K-12. Much of it is laced with homosexual/transgender ideology. This is almost always followed up by a “transgender bathroom” policy being imposed on the school system. And the St. Louis parents are hearing those reports as well.

As the saying goes, there's a new sheriff in town!

We’ve already documented how our MassResistance affiliate in Nebraska is courageously fighting this battle in Omaha. And we’re seeing it in many other places. Unfortunately, most parents don’t know what to do -- or how to deal with this. Luckily we have over two decades of experience.

Radical LGBT sex ed comes to a suburban school district

Parkway School District covers several communities in suburban St. Louis. It is a fairly affluent area and relatively conservative. Parents tend to trust the school system to “do the right thing.”

But on March 9, 2016, the 7-member Parkway School Board shocked parents by passing a district-wide K-12 comprehensive sexuality curriculum that was extreme, graphic, and radical.

This was done despite widespread objections from parents, and others in the community, and after the pro bono law firm Liberty Counsel sent the School Board a letter warning them that the curriculum violated state law because of its connection to Planned Parenthood.

How bad is it?


It’s a pattern that we’ve seen a lot. At first glance, it seems relatively benign. It has an upbeat name, “Healthy Relationships & Sexual Health Education.” But when you look at the links to the “overview” and “objectives” for the various grade levels, though written in vague terms, they are clearly overbearing and very age-inappropriate.

It’s the “recommended resources” for each grade that are actually the meat of the curriculum. They are used to push extreme and graphic sexual and homosexual topics into even the lower elementary grades (as early as 2nd grade).

And Liberty Counsel’s letter describes, the resource list reveals that large portions of this curriculum were in fact taken from some of the most radical sexual and homosexual groups in the country, including Planned Parenthood, GLSEN, SIECUS, the National Abortion Federation, and several others.

Throughout most of the K-12 curriculum (often even in elementary school lessons) Liberty Counsel and the parents saw:
  • No moral issue with having multiple sexual partners.
  • Fairly extensive abortion counseling for young girls.
  • Attempts to normalize homosexuality and cross - dressing by teaching false theories about “sexual orientation,” “gender identity,” and “gender expression.”
  • Lessons causing children to question “what it means to be a boy/man, and what it means to be a girl/woman.”
  • Attacks on the traditional family under the guise of combatting “discrimination” based on “gender roles and stereotypes.”
  • Promotion of sexual anarchy, abortion, homosexual sex acts, and homosexual relationships disguised as “health education”
  • Incorrect medical advice regarding contraception and AIDS prevention
  • Explicit subjects such as lessons about oral and anal sex for seventh graders, and references to positive experiences of sado-masochism and pornography.
  • And much more
It's worse than you can imagine:
This book -- one of the most pornographic childen's books ever written -- is on the "resource" list!
This Powerpoint file of excerpts from the "FLASH" sexuality materials on the resource list for 4th graders) includes few pages from the book.
Even more graphic are the "Life Planning Education" lessons, from the resource list for 8th graders.
An extremely important part of these lessons is the teacher’s guide for each grade level. These not only include how to use the “recommended resources” but also often include other resources, objectives, and teaching techniques not listed elsewhere.

However, despite multiple freedom of information requests, the Parkway School System has refused to make available the teachers guides to parents. This alone says a lot.
The Board has also refused to make the sex-ed program “opt-in” like other school electives. Instead, parents who don’t like the course must have their children go through an “opt-out” scenario that is often purposefully embarrassing and humiliating for the child.

Confronting the curriculum before the Board


The parents have been fighting this curriculum publicly for over a year and stating their objections in committees since 2014, when the school district first revealed it to the public.
The horrific issues listed above were tirelessly and meticulously explained to Board members in both public and private meetings by parents. A month before the vote nearly a thousand parents and local citizens had signed a petition opposing the curriculum. A group of five physicians representing 30,000 medical professionals came and testified that the curriculum had numerous medical inaccuracies.

But except for one Board member who is constantly outvoted, the majority have chosen to simply ignore these concerns and have publicly committed to refusing to reconsider the March 9 vote, despite pleas from parents.

Planned Parenthood and LGBT groups targeting local parents

These radical  national groups believe it’s critical to implement these lessons in the schools. And they’ve put together special tactics to stop parents from getting in the way.
Planned Parenthood's St. Louis area website to organize and mobilize teenagers to confront opponents (i.e., parents) of the sex ed curriculum.

Over the last year Planned Parenthood and the radical LGBT group GLSEN recruited local Parkway middle and high school students and pro-LGBT parents. They’ve organized them to aggressively support the implementation of the curriculum – and to confront, intimidate, and demean parents who publicly try to block or oppose it. This strategy includes an aggressive social media presence, going to Board meetings in large groups, and continuously lobbying Board members.
Planned Parenthood organized these students to intimidate parents both outside the meetings as they came in (above) and inside the meeting room (right).

In addition, national LGBT groups organized students and parents who came to the meetings in a large group.

Not your average parents organization

Given all of this lining up against them, most parents would be completely overwhelmed and would probably just give up. But Planned Parenthood and GLSEN are not used to seeing anything like the parents from Missouri MassResistance.
But parents have refused to be intimidated. They came and stood their ground!
These parents are smart, sophisticated, and they’re not intimidated by the liberals’ offensive and often disgusting tactics to demean them. And they’re not giving up! They show up at Board meetings and are unafraid. For every seeming defeat, they come up with 5 new strategies to resist.
On their website, www.MassResistanceMissouri.org, they have done a marvelous job of researching, documenting, informing, and activating every facet of this battle.

No backing down here! The home page of the MassResistanceMissouri website.

Latest tactic to silence parents -- Board introduces “civility policy”!

We had to include this! It’s always interesting to see what dishonest politicians will do to attempt to silence people.

At Parkway District School Board meetings the Missouri MassResistance parents have continued to be very respectfully vocal about their outrage over the sexuality and homosexuality about to be pushed on children. The LGBT school activists have tried to intimidate parents, but it hasn’t been working too well.

So at the Aug. 3 meeting, the Board proposed a “civility policy” that would be imposed on all people on school property – but clearly aimed at parents attending School Board meetings.
This proposed ban, with its open-ended language, would effectively keep parents from criticizing Board members, from describing the graphic content in the curriculum, criticizing homosexual or transgender behavior, or having any public or private discussion that the Board might consider to be “intimidating” or “insulting” to them!


The Parkway Board of Education poses for a photo at the Aug. 3 meeting, where they introduced the "civility policy." At right is the superintendent, Dr. Keith Marty. Next to him is the Board Chairman. At left is the lone pro-fmaily Board member.

It’s hard to imagine anything more un-American than muzzling how citizens can discuss or complain about the issues of government with their elected officials. Needless to say, this attack on the First Amendment seems to have sunk pretty fast. It was met with such a wave of outrage that it’s been “tabled” indefinitely.

But the stalwart group of Missouri MassResistance parents and citizens, which now has a local email list of nearly six hundred, has stepped up the fight considerably on this hideous issue.
More to report in our next installment!

Saturday, September 3, 2016

Mark Leno, Don't Let The Door Hit You On the Way Out of Sacramento!

The Los Angeles Times fawns over its liberals, especially the ones who have done so much to hurt our state, its citizens, and students.

UGH!

I am not happy that Democrats have so much power in Sacramento.

What do we have to be proud from the petulant progressives in Sac-Town?

REALLY?!

There is a glimmer of good news.

Mark Leno, the openly homosexual regressive Democrat (in name only, because he's really a perverted statist) is leaving the state legislature for good!

The Los Angeles Times tried to play up his exit as a final homecoming, as if everyone in the state will miss him.

Believe me, I hope that the door does not (or should it?) hit him on the way out!

From the Los Angeles Times:


UGH!

Where do I vomit?!

Mark Leno flashes a broad smile when a conversation about his political legacy pivots to an earlier part of his life, when he was a restless young man who abruptly decided to walk away from rabbinical school without any plan for what would come next.

What is he so proud of?

He shoved the destructive, anti-biological homosexual agenda on everyone.

He forced through the forced wage hike which will drive businesses underground or out of business entirely.

He has been the sprearhead piercing this state's economy and culture.

“My friend gave me a T-shirt that year for Hanukkah that said, ‘Rebbe Without A Cause,’” Leno said with a laugh.

Rebbe? Don't rub me the wrong way.

To know him is to get the joke: This is a man full of causes, ones for which the Democrat has patiently and passionately advocated during a 14-year career in the California Legislature that’s now coming to a close.

The best cause will be his leaving the state of California.

God forbid this guy should replace Nancy Pelosi when she retires (or dies in office).

“If there's a theme throughout this, it’s that I fight for the underdog,” Leno said. “Whoever that underdog may be."

Underdog? Really? This man is a dog of a legislator, chewing away at what's left for everyone else.

The gay bullies are not underdogs. They are attacking everyone else.

They are no longer "the oppressed." They are the oppressors. They are attacking men and women's freedom of conscience.

They are going after private institutions.


Through the years, his causes have often led to substantive change, in part because of what friends and even foes agree is his unmatched perseverance. Leno, the author of 161 laws, rarely gives up.

In almost all of his celebrated achievements — this year’s deal to boost California’s minimum wage to $15 an hour, to require police search warrants to access electronic devices or Internet service providers, more probation services for felons — the fight took years. Some efforts, such as one of the nation’s first efforts at single-payer universal healthcare, may never come to fruition.

So, with that forced wage hike, where will all the released prisoners find new jobs?

Leno is undaunted.

“You just chip away, year after year after year,” he said. “You start getting some cracks in that wall, and then sometimes circumstances change.”

That's exactly what Republicans, that's exactly what conservatives are going to do.

We are going to chip away at the corruption, malfeasance, waste, and irresponsibility of the Democratic Party and their corrosive dominance in California.

Forced out of office by term limits, the state senator who championed an expansion of gay rights, reform of the prison sentencing system and new warnings on flame-retardant chemicals in furniture has no idea what comes next.

With no immediate political office waiting in the wings, Leno, 65, will return this fall to San Francisco and the neighborhood small business he started in 1978.

“I’ve never been kicked out of any place in my life,” he said with a quick laugh. “So this is a new phenomenon.”

Leno is in many ways a throwback to a different era. From his crisp shirts and suits to his devotion to decorum, he stands out in a political environment where the goal is often to dominate rather than legislate. Never one to hide his identity as a gay man and an unabashed liberal, he has won admirers in both parties.

In June, after he presented his final state spending plan as budget chairman, the entire Senate rose for a long and loud ovation. As many Republicans as Democrats praised him.

Leno’s penchant for civility has not faded even when fiercely advocating for a cause that inflames passions under the Capitol dome.

“He’s not afraid to have a fight,” said Democrat Darrell Steinberg, the former president pro tem of the state Senate. “But he has the rare ability to fight while also maintaining a grace about himself, and an intellect to go with it.”

He's going to face more fights very soon, and so will all the other

Perhaps his most consistent battle has been for the rights of lesbian, gay, bisexual and transgender Californians. Leno, one of the first two openly gay men elected to the Legislature, wrote laws to expand bans on housing and employment discrimination as well as workplace benefits for transgender employees. And perhaps most visibly, he wrote the 2005 bill to legalize same-sex marriages, a bill former Gov. Arnold Schwarzenegger vetoed.

Give me a break!

LGBT "identity" is not a civil right.

Next.

“There is no legislator in the country who has done more to advance LGBT rights than Mark Leno,” said Geoff Kors, a friend and longtime gay rights advocate who is now a city councilman in Palm Springs.

It's time to scale back this intrusion of the government into our daily lives.

euality

Equal rights for all, special privileges for none.

“Mark’s not the person who plays public hardball politics,” Kors said. “He’s the person who talks one-on-one with everyone to make his case.”

That's such a lie.

That skill was probably well-honed as a child.

"I was a skinny little kid who could never have won a physical altercation if I had one,” he said. “You learn how to get along with people when you need to."

Leno was born in Milwaukee, Wis., to first-generation Americans, a family of Eastern European Jews who immigrated to the United States in 1915. He left Milwaukee after high school and headed for New York City and the chance to freely live his life as a gay man.

That conflicted with plans to become a rabbi. Leno couldn’t reconcile the chaste world of religious leadership with the liberated nightlife provided by Manhattan in the 1970s. He admits he had “no aspirations” once rabbinical school faded away. And after a series of odd jobs, including a brief stint as an office assistant to singer Art Garfunkel (they coincidentally met on an airplane), his youngest sister suggested he move west to San Francisco.

It was not an easy transition, but he made up for it with enthusiasm. A small loan led him to open a sign-printing store, and the business’ success gave him entry into volunteering in local politics.

John Whitehurst, his campaign manager for legislative races in 2002 and 2008, said the story of Leno’s arrival in San Francisco has uncanny parallels to that of the late Harvey Milk, another gay man who left New York to open a small business in San Francisco and then launched a historic career in politics.

Harvey Milk was a pedophile. Does anyone really want to be equated with that creep?!

Leno never got to meet Milk before the activist’s assassination in 1978. But he later occupied the same seat on the San Francisco Board of Supervisors and wrote the 2009 law that created an annual Harvey Milk Day in the state. Photos of the slain leader adorn Leno’s office.

Bleaugh!

Mark Leno (Credit: Vapoteurs)


“What I attribute to Harvey was a burning desire to break a glass ceiling,” Leno said. “Who he was, and the symbol he has become, was a great motivator.”

So, Leno is claiming to be a woman now? HUH?!

He was elected to the Assembly in 2002 and arrived in Sacramento with hopes of leading a powerful legislative committee. His assignment, chair of the Assembly’s public safety committee, included killing crime and punishment bills that Democrats didn’t like. In 2006, he tried instead to reach across the aisle and collaborate on one of those bills.

It came close to costing him his political career.

Leno huddled with Republican lawmakers for weeks with the hope that he could stave off a statewide ballot measure cracking down on sex offenders, believing the Legislature could craft a better version.

But a dispute over punishment for child pornography left him in the uncomfortable position of trying to negotiate an acceptable number of explicit photos on a person’s computer hard drive — a discussion that began only by his worry that an unintentional download could unfairly send someone to prison.

With what he believed to be a bipartisan deal in hand, Leno brought the bill up for a vote. Democrats, trusting his lead, voted yes. Republicans surprised him by refusing to vote. It was a painful lesson.

“Sometimes, it’s not about solving a problem. It’s about making a point,” he said. “It turned out they only wanted to go to the ballot,” a measure that became Proposition 83, known as “Jessica’s Law.”

Oh, that's right--the Big Bad Republicans are all wheeling and dealing, backstabbing and handwringing ...

How about all the crap that the Democrats have been doing to schools, to parents, to teachers, to businesses, to workers, to everyone?

It then got worse. A press release from the California Republican Party castigated him for approving of “child porn,” and rivals in San Francisco whispered the same messages when he announced he would run against a fellow Democrat, then-state Sen. Carole Migden, in 2008.

Luckily for Leno, his political strengths were too much for Migden. And the Senate seat he won came with perhaps the biggest assignment of all, chairing the powerful budget committee. It put him face-to-face with Schwarzenegger, with whom Leno sparred on several issues.

Who forget the epic trolling when Schwarzenegger vetoed the port of San Francisco appropriations bill?

Even now, the affable Leno rarely passes on an opportunity to excoriate the record of the former governor. Leno often points out Schwarzenegger’s 2003 campaign to rescind the recession-sparked increase in the state’s vehicle license fee. It blew a multibillion-dollar hole in the state budget, and Leno said the ensuing fights with Schwarzenegger and Republicans over budget crises often left him “frustrated and angry and sad.”

But it rarely showed in public, as Leno said he always tries to “choose my words, and choose my actions, as careful as I can.”

Others saw it as an affirmation of character.

"You get what you give,” said Steinberg, “and he gets a lot of respect because he gives a lot of respect."

Through the years, Leno was able to give more of himself to his legislative career than might have others who balanced work with family. It was not by choice. His partner, Douglas Jackson, died of complications from HIV in 1990. Jackson was memorialized in the early years of the national AIDS memorial quilt. A replica of his quilt panel hangs as a poignant reminder in Leno’s San Francisco office.

There's another lesson here: don't mess with biology.

“People were dying everywhere, so I was not alone in my grief,” Leno said. In the years since, he said he has remained single. “I've had the opportunity to put my entire being into public service.”

Celibate is the only way of one chooses to identify as gay.

Whether that public service continues isn’t clear. Leno admits he doesn’t know what he wants to do next. There have been thoughts of a campaign for mayor of San Francisco, which wouldn’t be until 2019 at the earliest. Others think he would be ideal in Congress, should House Minority Leader Nancy Pelosi decide in the near future to retire.

What did I say? Well, what did I say?

“He’s really a political dragon slayer,” Whitehurst said. “He would be hard to beat.”

Last month, Leno hinted in a San Francisco public radio interview that he might be willing to help lead a 2018 ballot measure campaign to force changes in police accountability laws that failed this summer at the state Capitol. "They cannot do their work without trust from the communities they serve,” he said.

Whatever path he chooses, observers believe Leno will always take the high road in an era where few others seem to follow.

“It’s not partisanship that’s the enemy, it’s temperament,” Steinberg said. Leno “is an example of how you can have fierce disagreements but can combine that with collegial, collaborative politics.”

“No matter who replaces him,” Kors said, “Mark’s departure from the Legislature is going to leave a tremendous gap.”

No it won't.

Final Reflection

I do not care how nice someone may appear in public.

If they craft bad legislation which harms our rights, they are doing evil deeds.

Mark Leno was full of them.

And full of it.

I am glad that he is gone.

I fear whatever incarnation of regressive leftism will take his place, but let's hope that Republicans start getting their act together and take back the state house ASAP!