Showing posts with label Catholic. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Catholic. Show all posts

Friday, July 25, 2025

The Controversies at LifeSiteNews


John Henry-Westen, the CEO and Editor-in-Chief of LifeSiteNews, was recently removed from his position by the LifeSiteNews board. Then he got reinstated.

These moves caught much of the pro-life, pro-family, religious conservative world off guard. That’s saying a great deal, considering that pro-life and pro-family conservatives have seen all kinds of moral decline and degradation becoming the norm throughout the West. Pro-family fighters have witnessed same-sex “marriage,” rising defenses for pedophilia, and the increased push for assisted suicide. So little shocks us now.

What’s going on here? Should we be concerned? Why is one of the flagship pro-family (and anti-LGBT) news sites facing such leadership turmoil?

First, let’s talk about LifeSiteNews.

This Catholic-based news site has rigorously and accurately documented the downfall and decline of a De-Christianized West. For years, their commentary and confrontation on these matters commanded respect. They even republished the activist reporting from the organization I work for—MassResistance—because of our unwavering commitment against the LGBT agenda in all of its perverse forms.

LifeSiteNews did not back away from calling out moral corruption. To their credit, they were not only unafraid to call out the wrongs and evils of homosexuality and transgenderism. They were a welcome voice for social conservatives like me because they unflinchingly criticized the Republican Party, including President Trump, as they cozied up to so-called LGBT “conservatives” infiltrating the larger conservative movement. Their countercultural attack on mainstream conservatism gave me hope in spite of the growing fecklessness or cowardice of conservative leadership to oppose same-sex “marriage”, adoption, and the like.

So, what’s going on at LifeSiteNews? Is the leadership getting soft, embracing pro-“gay” messaging? Not a chance.

Rather, the news site has taken a dark turn on another set of issues.

For the last two years, I noticed the site’s publishing an increasing number of anti-Israel, anti-Zionist articles on many policy fronts. They were cataloguing the so-called war crimes of the IDF and blasting American politicians and foreign policy makers as puppets of Israel.

Here’s a sample:

Orthodox rabbi: Zionism a ‘cardinal sin’ for Jews, creation of Israel is ‘satanic’

Zionism: Rebellion against God?! | Rabbi speaks out

Why is a Catholic-oriented news site interviewing a Rabbi? And why are they going off on Israel and Zionism?

Oh, and it gets better (or rather, worse). They talk about the horrendous “Israel Lobby” that supposedly controls Washington:

GOP Congressman Thomas Massie exposes Zionist lobby’s power over Congress

Leaked audio exposes Israel lobby’s enormous power over the Trump administration

WATCH: Candace Owens exposes the Israel lobby’s stranglehold on America

For what it’s worth, Candace Owens has been exposed as an intellectual lightweight with a shaky grasp of the facts. She celebrated Andrew Tate, a serial pornographer under indictment for sex trafficking, while denouncing pornography. She also claimed that Hitler was not that bad.

Regarding the purported power of AIPAC, most of their funding goes to Democrats, and the Democratic Party has become increasingly hostile to Israel. As for Congressman  Massie, his performance theater against big spending is starting to wear thin. He never called out the big spending from his fellow US Senators, and he voted for liberal Republican Tom Emmer to be the next Speaker of the House this year. The focus and subject matter of these reports leave much to be desired.

And sadly, LifeSiteNews has thrown itself into the USS Liberty conspiracy. (I refute those talking points here.)



In 2023, Patrick Delaney, one of the editors at LifeSiteNews, wrote, “Orthodox patriarchate condemns ‘Israeli radicals’ for attacking bishop, priest at Church of Gethsemane.”

Yes, there are Jewish radicals, as there are radicals in other religions. What is conspicuously missing from this coverage, however, is the widespread denunciation from other Jews against such abuses. In contrast, Islamic militants have committed all sorts of crimes and terrorism against innocents—Christian, Jew, Muslim—and there is no condemnation from residents in Gaza or Judea and Samaria of their hostilities.

For the record, the Israeli government has cracked down on hyper-orthodox adherents harassing Christians, and local Rabbis raised funds to help repair a Catholic church attacked by Jewish radicals, too.

In 2024, Delaney wrote a particularly egregious article, claiming that Israel was conducting a “genocide” against the residents of Gaza following the October 7th, 2023 terrorist attack from Hamas:

Israeli soldiers celebrate the ‘torturing, humiliating, and mocking’ of Palestinians on social media

I refused to remain quiet in the face of these blatant lies. I wrote an extensive response email (republished here), refuting the libelous claims about Israel and American foreign policy vis-à-vis the Jewish State. I focused on the redefinition of “genocide.” I also pointed out that his using “Al-Jazeera” as a legitimate news source is suspect.

Delaney responded, and he provided a broad mixture of half-truths and misdefinitions to justify his dishonest arguments.

LifeSiteNews eventually printed my letter, along with Delaney’s response (InfoWars republished the article, too!), but referred to me as “William” and called me a “Christian Zionist journalist,” presumably as a smear. I wear such terms as a badge of honor. The most damning aspect of Delaney’s defense of calling Israel’s attacks on Hamas “genocide” rested on his contortion of the term to include any form of fighting in a combat zone!

With all of this information in the background, let’s get to the firing and rehiring (?) of John Henry-Westen.

LifeSiteNews Co-Founder and Managing Editor Steve Jalsevac released a statement regarding Westen’s departure:

While legal constraints prevent us from delving into extensive detail, I can share that the decision was influenced by several factors, including a 72% drop in readership from 2021 to 2024 during John-Henry’s tenure as CEO, a decline in monthly and new donors, and other business challenges. Additionally, an internal survey revealed significant concerns regarding staff sentiment and safety scores, which further informed the board’s considerations.

 

Nonprofits have to keep the money flowing, but should stick to their principles. A steep drop-off of nearly three-quarters of your readership is troubling.

I can guess why LifeSiteNews is losing readers and donors:

The Pro-Hamas, Anti-Israel Propaganda!

Truth matters in the fight against moral and sexual degradation. When a Catholic-based news site insists on pushing pro-terrorist propaganda, venturing into foreign policy conspiracy theories, they are embracing lies, one can expect that their once-faithful readership will be repulsed.

And now, we receive word that John Henry-Westen has been reinstated.

Surprisingly, the site issued a very short reinstatement statement:

The LifeSiteNews Board of Directors voted today to restore John-Henry Westen to his former position.

 

“John-Henry Westen has been recognized by the board as the President and CEO of lifesitenews.com Inc. subject to administrative review and investigation.”

C.J. Doyle of the Catholic Action League of Massachusetts issued the following analysis:

"This is likely the only time in the history of corporate governance that a statement restoring a CEO showed even less cordiality than the statement which announced his firing.

The brevity, timing and language of the announcement all suggest a profound reluctance, or even resentment, on the part of those who issued it.

It was released at 5:47 EDT on a Friday afternoon, a time best suited to minimize publicity on a story that a corporation or a government agency wishes to bury.

The use of the word 'recognized', rather than the more usual 're-appointed' is curious. It might suggest that the previous vote was somehow improper or legally defective.

The inclusion of the phrase 'subject to administrative review and investigation' suggests continued hostility towards Westen by the Board of Directors.

There is also a striking omission. There is no mention of Westen being restored as Editor-in-Chief of LifeSiteNews, a position specifically referenced in his termination announcement.”

LifeSiteNews is losing readers, then they bungled the removal of the CEO. C.J. Doyle’s analysis makes sense. Potential litigation often scares organizations into a quick, unexplained course correction.

But did the board fire Westen because of the website’s increasing embrace of anti-Zionist propaganda? One of the frequent commentators on the site, Peter LaBarbera, shared with me that Westen was not removed because of the anti-Zionist turn in reporting: “It wasn’t about the Israel bashers. They’re still there!” He encouraged me to reach out to one of their main contributors, who privately shared his criticism of the anti-Zionism turn in reporting, but that writer has not gotten back to me yet.

If the LifeSiteNews board of directors can’t see how their dishonest reporting on the Arab-Israeli conflict is affecting readers, then they should be fired!

If LifeSiteNews editors want to maintain life on their site to report the news, they need to get back to reporting … news! All the anti-Zionist propaganda, I submit, is the real turn-off, turning off the donations and views.

The larger question remains: why publish such anti-Israeli (and thus anti-Semitic) garbage? One suspects that the site, based in Canada, is trying to placate an increasing Muslim population. Perhaps they are buying into the engagement harvesting that comes with anti-Semitic conspiracy theories. Whatever the reason, they need a major course-correction if they want to survive.

Tuesday, December 19, 2023

Anti-Semitic Catholic Fraud E. Michael Jones Caves, Caters to Apostate Pope's Celebration of Homosexual "Couples"

These anti-Semitic "Trad-Con" fraudulent traditional Catholics are just as fake as the liberals. 

 Look at this hateful "Trad Con," who has made a large industry out of hating Jews and pushing "LOGOS", apart from the full revelation of Christ Jesus as Savior: E. Michael Jones is actually OK with the Pope's latest heretic directive.

He is actually justifying it, because some priest whom he "respects" says that it is OK.

NO!

This is all wrong.

And this capitulation by a hatemonger like E. Michael Jones just goes to show that people are more obsessed with what they can see, with authoritarian measures from some power or authority that they can recognize with their flesh, rather than honoring the King of Kings, Lord of Lords who is invisible to our limited, physical eyes.

Monday, September 4, 2023

Before the Church, There Is the Word

 

 Traditional denominations insist on asserting that "the church" came before God's Word. And yet, God's Word could not be clearer on the matter: "In the beginning was the Word, and the Word was with God, and the Word was God." (John 1:1) 

 And let's not forget what Paul wrote to the Colossians: "And He is the head of the body, the church, who is the beginning, the firstborn from the dead, that in all things He may have the preeminence." (Colossians 1:18) 

 Jesus has the pre-eminence in all things. He is the Word, and He is First. There is nothing that exists that did exist before He. And the Church came out of Himself, since He redeemed the Church: "Take heed therefore unto yourselves, and to all the flock, over the which the Holy Ghost hath made you overseers, to feed the church of God, which he hath purchased with his own blood." (Acts 20:28) 

 And yet, provocations such as the one below persist:

 
This answer, in one of the comments, settles the matter quite effectively: 

 Well the canon was compiled and known long before the Roman Church was ever a thing. Also, you might read it, but you belong to a church that teaches really bad theology so you don’t exactly follow it. 

 And here are the specifics to establish the matter:
 
Justin Martyr, around 155 A.D., quotes from 13 of the 27 New Testament books, including 2 Peter. Ireneus, around 175 A.D., quotes from every book in the New Testament except Philemon and 3 John. The Shepherd of Hermes (160 A.D.) quotes from every book of the New Testament except 2 Timothy, Titus, Philemon, 3 John, and Jude. Clement of Alexandria (200 A.D.) quotes from every book but Philemon, 2 John, and 3 John. Tertullian (200 A.D.) quotes from every book but 2 Peter, 2 John, and 3 John. 

The earliest writing containing a list of the received New Testament books is found in the Muratorian Fragment (180 A.D.), which came from Egypt, not Rome. That list (Muratorian Fragment) includes all of the New Testament except four of the General Epistles (Hebrews, James, 1 Peter, and 2 Peter). It lists the Wisdom of Solomon as the only other book that was received. For a book to be “received” meant that it was viewed as being part of sacred Scripture. 

 The Roman Catholic Church did not give us the Bible. Rather, as Christ and the apostles stated with regard to the Old Testament, we affirm that the same is true of the New Testament. God gave us the Bible, and He used the witnesses of the various churches to secure for us those books that would be profitable for our instruction.

Monday, June 14, 2021

RINO Mario Guerra Defends Homosexuality, Calls Catholic, Pro-Family Views "Hate Speech"



Lettter from RINO former Downey, CA Mario Guerra, in response to my rebuke toward RNC Chairwoman Ronna McDaniel's PRIDE Tweet:

Dear Mr. Schaper,
I felt the need to respond to your email this morning.

I am a member of the CAGOP Board of Directors, and I was one of those who received this email from you today.

I am also the former Mayor of Downey, current Civilian Aide to the Secretary of the Army, a proud Republican, and a member of the Catholic Clergy (ordained in 2002). I am telling you this, so you know that my response to you is totally from me personally

I am NOT speaking on behalf of anyone nor any organization that I belong to nor have in the past. These are my personal thoughts.

I have been married for 35 years, have 5 grown kids and 4 grandchildren. I was a refugee that arrived in this country on one of the first freedom flights escaping communism. Like many immigrants my parents gave up everything to come to this amazing country. I had three brothers who have passed away. Two of the three were gay. One died from AIDS, another one from cancer and the other from a plane crash.

I write this general information to give you some background on who I am and what I represent.

I loved all my brothers. While two were gay they were part of who I am as a family. As a Christian I can vouch for what I know to be God's love for them as much as me. 

I was embarrassed in my early years about their homosexuality and would not want my friends to know. I overcame this as I matured, understood who they were and as my faith grew. They did not choose to be gay by the way, just like you or I choose to be straight.

Your email and thoughts are disgusting and insulting. 

We are better than that and I am proud to be part of a party that is inclusive to everyone. Including our gay family and friends. Our party stands for equality and principles of how we treat others.

While I do not usually respond to such unbelievable hateful rhetoric, I couldn’t help myself in this case. I felt the need to respond to you. I have been praying for guidance all morning since I read your email.

What we should do, out of respect, is have the attitude of presence, accompaniment, sincerity, prayer and invocation together with everyone. We all need to be and live as true children of God.

Perhaps the best way to understand pride is to imagine what you would say to a young person who finally summoned up the courage to tell you that they are LGBTQ. You know that God created them, that God loves them, and you know that God wants you to accept who they are. At least I do. I have no doubt in my heart.

Awareness of your own dignity, which is closer to what pride month is: a celebration of the human dignity of a group of people who for so long have been looked upon as less with disgust from people you. Treated with hate, just like you are portraying them in your email.

As a Catholic Clergy I have been proud of the Catholic Gay and Lesbian Ministry we have had in the Los Angeles Archdiocese for over 20 years. Most people do not know that. The Catechism of the Catholic Church teaches that everyone “must be accepted with respect, compassion and sensitivity. Every sign of unjust discrimination in their regard should be avoided.”

I am happy to see that our party nationally is accepting of everyone. As they say in politics, our tent is big, and everyone is welcome. We should be spending time on electing Republicans and avoiding hate speech. We all want the government out of our churches, out of our bank accounts and out of our bedrooms. We should ask no less for our party. We should push hate speech like yours out of our party also.

Ivanka Trump, President Trump's daughter and presidential advisor, recently stated, "I am proud to support my LGBTQ friends and the LGBTQ Americans who have made immense contributions to our society and economy." 

I will pray for you and those who feel the way you do.

Help us to see that every human being is an image-bearer who must be afforded compassion, love, kindness, respect, and dignity. Keep us from engaging in hateful and harassing behavior toward any individual or group.

Help us heavenly father and others to see that in your goodness and grace, you have created all human beings in your image.

Again, these are my personal thoughts and views. I am in no way speaking for those on this email, just like you do not speak for me in your views on what it is to be a Republican. Mario


UNCLASSIFIED

Dn. Mario A. Guerra CPIA
Civilian Aide to the Secretary of  the Army



Cell 562-706-4114
Mario@Guerrains.com


Mario Guerra does not know his faith or the traditions of Catholicism very well.

He also, shamelessly, used the coat of arms in his email response to me, even though he had repeatedly claimed that his remarks were his alone, and that he was not speaking in any specific capacity for any other organization or agency. What's going on here?

Friday, September 15, 2017

Pro-Life Groups Stand Up to ArchBishop of Boston

Pro-life groups in Massachusetts demand that Archbishop of Boston stop publicly betraying pro-life principles.

Their message to Archbishop: “Stop the Betrayals.” Obey your own rules!

Catholics urge pro-lifers around the world (including non-Catholics) to sign online statement.

September 15, 2017

Cardinal O'Malley honors pro-abortion Secretary of State John Kerry with an honorary degree at Boston College in 2014.
Pro-life leaders in Massachusetts have decided they can’t stay silent any longer.
A coalition of outraged Catholic pro-life organizations along with major Catholic and non-Catholic activists has issued a public statement calling upon Cardinal Sean O’Malley, the Archbishop of Boston, and the other Catholic bishops of Massachusetts, to stop their blatant public betrayals of the pro-life movement.  
The statement cites nineteen blatant violations of official Catholic pro-life policy in the last three years, involving Catholic Bishops in Massachusetts.
The statement was written by a committee led by Bill Cotter, president of Boston’s Operation Rescue, and C.J. Doyle of the Catholic Action League of Massachusetts,along with pro-life activists Brendan O’Connell, Robert Joyce, Brian Camenker of MassResistance, and others. It was released to the public on Wednesday, Sept. 13. The online version for the public to sign was posted soon after.
This may be the first time in the United States that lay Catholics (and pro-life allies) have publicly confronted the Bishops for their actions that clearly contradict official Catholic teaching and policy. But serious Catholics have been deeply troubled and distraught over this for years.
Official Catholic policy is very clear: In its 2004 document Catholics in Political Life, the U.S. Conference of Catholic Bishops specifically prohibited Catholic institutions from giving awards, honors, or platforms to political figures who support legal abortion.
But they seem to do this all the time.
Among the incidences cited in the statement:
  • Earlier this year Cardinal O'Malley attended the “Profiles in Courage” Award ceremony at the Kennedy Library honoring former President Barack Obama, whose administration was sued by the Little Sisters of the Poor over the Obamacare contraceptive mandate.
  • In 2014 the Missionary Society of St James – whose president is Cardinal O'Malley – presented an Award to Boston Mayor Marty Walsh, a longtime proponent of legal abortion. Walsh was the recipient of the 2016 Men of Choice Award from NARAL Pro-Choice Massachusetts. He went on to defend the public funding of Planned Parenthood. He named a square in Boston after abortionist Kenneth Edelin. And Mayor Walsh recently called for Boston to become a sanctuary city for abortions, should Roe v. Wade be overturned.
  • Also in, 2014, Cardinal O’Malley participated in a ceremony in Boston College (a Catholic university) conferred an honorary degree on U.S. Secretary of State John F. Kerry, who was also the commencement speaker. Kerry had a 100% pro-abortion record as a U.S. Senator. In 2004, while running for president, Kerry attacked Pope John Paul II, accusing the Pontiff of “an inappropriate crossing of the line” for urging Catholics in public life to defend traditional marriage. O’Malley—who was appointed by John Paul II—gave the benediction, was photographed smiling and shaking hands with Kerry, and then posed for another photograph with him.
  • On September 1, 2017, Cardinal O’Malley co-authored an article in the Boston Globe on immigration with the notorious Massachusetts Attorney General Maura Healey. Healey has received a 100% rating from Planned Parenthood and also $1.6 million in campaign support from them. She has vowed to shut down pro-life pregnancy counseling centers. Healey is also an aggressive lesbian activist. Earlier this year, her office issued a statement that Massachusetts churches could be prosecuted for not allowing “transgender” bathrooms.

Cardinal O'Malley and Barack O'Bama (AP Photo)

The final straw: The Cardinal’s signature ban

This year, a Catholic pro-life group announced a state-wide signature effort for an initiative petition for a Constitutional Amendment to ban tax-funded abortions in Massachusetts. Almost immediately after that announcement, Cardinal O’Malley imposed a ban on signature gathering on all Church properties. They claimed that many parishioners opposed the collection of signatures at Catholic churches, which was traditionally a mainstay for “culture war” statewide efforts. But pro-life and pro-marriage people say it was always very popular.
This inexplicable act was the final straw, in the minds of many faithful Catholics, that led to the creation of this public statement.

A Catholic-run group in Massachusetts is gathering signatures for a state Constitutional Amendment to stop taxpayer funding of abortion. But the Cardinal has banned them from getting signatures on Church property!

“Repeated and ongoing scandals and betrayals”

The statement does not mince words. It characterizes the Bishops' behavior as a series of "repeated, ongoing and worsening scandals and betrayals, which demoralize faithful Catholics, marginalize the pro-life community, and send a message of confusion and contradiction to secular society."
Boston Operation Rescue President Bill Cotter said it best in a statement to the press:
All we are asking of our prelates is that they uphold their own professed principles and abide by their own stated policies. The disconnect in the Catholic hierarchy between rhetoric and reality on the issue of abortion must come to an end.
The bishops expose themselves to the reproach of hypocrisy when they urge Catholics to support the right to life, but then give awards and platforms to public officials who work to keep abortion legal, unrestricted and publicly funded.
No rational person can reasonably be expected to take seriously Catholic opposition to abortion when Catholic bishops and cardinals honor and extol, at public events, even in their own institutions, political figures who are opponents of the right to life, and allies of Planned Parenthood. The bishops must stop these betrayals.

A shock: Many Mass. pro-life groups and activists decline to sign

Probably the biggest shock to all of us was the number of staunch pro-life organizations and individual activists – all of whom are Catholic – who have declined to sign the statement.
This is what, sadly, reveals the corruption, cowardliness, and faithlessness in today’s pro-life movement.
In every case the individuals we spoke with did not have a religious problem with signing it, and said they “personally” agreed with the statement. The reasons were basically political and financial. Some told us it was because the Cardinal occasionally shows up at their events, and they didn’t want to antagonize him or the Archdiocese.  Others said that publicly signing the statement might hurt their fundraising. One or two signature gatherers for the referendum said that if they didn’t antagonize the Cardinal, maybe their pastors might encourage their parishioners to sign their sheets. (Not likely, actually).
It’s all completely shameful. Many of these same activists excoriate Catholic politicians for being “personally” pro-life but voting for anti-life bills because it’s politically expedient.

But positive reaction by conservative Catholic media

On the other hand, the reaction to the statement by the conservative Catholic media (i.e., not affiliated with the Bishops) has been overwhelmingly positive. It was initially promoted on Christian News Wire. Since then, members of the coalition have spoken personally with several conservative media figures. There will likely be a lot of positive press on this around the country (though not in the mainstream media, of course). This is exciting news, we were told. As of this writing, The Remnant, and ChurchMilitantTV, and about a dozen prominent blogs have done articles, and LifeSiteNews, Catholic World News and many others have articles being prepared.

A fight worth fighting everywhere

This fight is not new, and it’s certainly not confined to the United States – or the Catholic Church. For years, MassResistance activists in the United Kingdomhave been part of an effort there to stop the Church of England’s horrible descent into apostasy. They have relentlessly confronted church leaders both publicly and privately. In addition, earlier this summer when the Church announced it would be including “transgenderism” in its liturgy, Texas-MassResistance leader Dr. Robert Oscar Lopez personally travelled to the UK at the invitation of UK activists and addressed the national Anglican General Synod on July 8.
Don’t be left behind. Every pro-life person of good will should stand with this coalition and send this message!