Showing posts with label Catharine Baker. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Catharine Baker. Show all posts

Monday, February 4, 2019

Trump Makes GOP Toxic in California?

The San Francisco Chronicle is always ready to attack, condemn, shut down Republicans.

They have no interest in conservatives or center-right politics having a foothold or a chance of victory in the Golden State.

The liberal media loves to report how Republicans used to dominate the state of California, and now they have been pushed into absolute irrelevence.

Is there any way for the GOP to thrive, let alone survive, in the state of California?

This story follows the fallout for Catharine Baker, who was the only Republican legislator in the Bay Area. She was elected in 2014 following the term limit on the incumbent and a number of other local issues which gave her a chance against a union-backed big money Democrat.



At the first CAGOP Convention which I had attended, I got to listen to the consultants and the campaign managers who made her election a success. She was definitely liberal on a number of issues, including marriage, life, and even Cap and Trade.

She campaigned actively in support of this terrible program, in fact.

This has been the game which many Republicans have been told to play. The only wahy that Republicans can have a chance of winning is to be as liberal as possible. In the mean time, the state has gone from bad to worse, and more people are fleeing.

Was it ultimately President Trump which ruined the GOP brand in the state of California?

The San Francisco Chronicle wants to tell that story, to be sure. But is it a fair summation of what has happened in the state of California?

Or should we rather recognize that forty years of uninterrupted liberalism has ruined this state, and no political party can save it?


Catharine Baker was the only Republican representing the Bay Area in either the Legislature or Congress, until she lost her re-election bid to the Assembly in November. Now there is none.

The two-term incumbent practically ran as a Democrat, and still lost to a political neophyte. That raised the question: If Baker can’t win in the Bay Area, what Republican can?

She ran as a Democrat. Doesn't that say it all? Why is it that moderate Republicans end up embracing liberal policies across the board, only to lose in the end? That partisan two-step simply never pays off.

The answer Baker found after spending weeks combing through post-election data and campaign trail anecdotes should be a red flag for Republicans in the Bay Area and beyond in California, heading into President Trump’s 2020 re-election campaign.

“Ninety percent of the feedback we received was, ‘I can’t vote for you because you’re Republican,’” Baker said. “That message to Republicans is, ‘Your brand is toxic in this state.’ That’s why the party has a very faint pulse right now.”

What is it about Republicans that has turned off so many voters? It's not just the Republican policies, I submit. It's the corrupt press which has gone to great lengths to shame and diminish conservatives of every stripe.

Let's talk about the indoctrination, not education, which people young and old are enduring in the government schools throughout the state.

Being a Republican wasn’t a problem for Baker before Trump’s presidency. The Dublin resident won two elections in a district that stretches through the suburbs of central Contra Costa and eastern Alameda counties, where Democrats outnumber Republicans, by advocating policies that appeal across party lines.

Baker is pro-choice. She supports same-sex marriage rights and a pathway to citizenship for undocumented immigrants. She voted for the state’s leading-edge climate change law. She supported gun control measures in the Legislature.

I would haev to say, however, what is the point of running as a Republican if you are going to vote left on all the major issues? What votes did she ultimately cast which were in the best interests of the state and made her a worthwhile Republican? When looking at all the issues down the line, it doesn't make a lot of sense.

Baker reached out to Democrats and independents — she held 16 town hall meetings with Democratic state Sen. Steve Glazer of Orinda, whose district overlapped hers. She said internal polling showed that 60 percent of voters surveyed in her 16th District approved of her job performance.

Job approval does not translate into election victories. Time and again partisanship will win out, and there is no escaping that fact.

Yet Baker lost in November by two percentage points to Rebecca Bauer-Kahan, a Democratic attorney from Orinda who had never run for public office before.

Baker drowned in a wave election with a concrete “R” chained to her ankle.

More commentary than reporting, again. This frantic editorializing has turned off so many people to the mainstream media.

She wasn’t alone. The GOP lost half the 14 House seats it controlled in California. As usual, no Republicans were elected to statewide office — the last time a GOP candidate won one of those races was in 2006. There are so few Republicans in the Legislature that Democrats tried to invent a word (“giga-majority”) to describe what now amounts to more than a two-thirds supermajority.

Give me a break. There are other state legislatures which have a massive Democratic presence. They should check out the numbers in Massachusetts and Rhode Island. Oregon Democrats now have a supermajority in Salem. too.

Last month, the GOP lost another one. San Diego Assemblyman Brian Maienschein left the Republican Party to join the Democrats because he couldn’t stomach Trump any longer.


“I can either keep fighting to change the Republican Party, or I can fight for my constituents,” Maienschein said. “There wasn’t a way that I could continue and feel good about myself and the choices I was making.”

Give me a break! The only reason Maienschein left the Republican Party is that he knew that he had no chance of getting elected against in 2020. He barely held onto his seat last year, and realized that his best bet to staying in power was to join the Democrats. He had often voted with them anyway, so the change is not that dramatic.

Baker was as anti-Trump as any Republican in the state. She said she wrote in former Secretary of State Condoleezza Rice’s name on her 2016 presidential ballot and supported motions to censure Trump while in the Assembly.

Those kinds of actions probably hurt her even more. Most Republicans were angry with her to begin with because of the votes which she had cast in the past: gun control measures, assisted suicide, repeal of the religious exemptions for vaccinations. I cannot tell you how many people were furious with Baker because of those terrible votes!

She said she’s lost Republican friends and donors by publicly opposing Trump. Some told Baker that they supported her despite her liberal positions on abortion, same-sex marriage and the environment, and couldn’t understand why she wouldn’t stand by the president despite their differences.

Like I said! That's what utimately did it! Why continue to represent any district, any region as a Republican if you are not going to support the President and everything which the party stands for?

“I just felt he was too far out of the bounds,” Baker said in an interview for The Chronicle’s “It’s All Political” podcast. She was still happy to accept Republican help while disapproving of the party’s standard-bearer: “I suppose there’s a hypocrisy there, but one that I’m OK with.”

OUCH!

She admitted to being a hypocrite. That's going to turn off voters even more!

“Like every self-respecting Republican” who has opposed Trump, Baker said, she is constantly asked why she doesn’t leave the party.

“For me, it is not the right path,” Baker said. “I feel it is so important to not give up on the principles that made me a Republican.”

Catharine, what are those principles? What exactly did you vote for or against which qualified you as a Republican?

Baker, 47, grew up during Ronald Reagan’s presidency. She says he stood for things that appealed to her: individual freedom, small government, the power of the free market.

Her votes to give illegal aliens health insurance on the Obamacare exchanges? Her vote for assisted suicide? To force kids to take on vaccinations in public schools? How do these votes measure up as conservative? She even voted for the MCO tax!



She paraphrased Ohio Gov. John Kasich, a prominent GOP Trump critic, in explaining her decision to stay in the party. “If someone comes in and robs your house,” Baker said, “you don’t help them pack or just sit there and watch. You fight.”

What are these NeverTrump Republicans fighting for? The right to lose gracefully? The right to embrace left-wing policy stances? How is any of this a victory?

The challenge for Baker and others who share her frustrations is what to do next. How to get her party to win again. How to change.

The problem is not the party. The probglem is the culture which has overwhelmed the state of California. The problem cannot get better with different "messaging" or more liberal party politics from both sides of the aisle.

Sadly, it appears that California's problems have become so great, that party politics cannot fix them.

For starters, she is concerned about who will be the next California Republican Party chair. In particular, she’s concerned about former Orange County Assemblyman Travis Allen.

This is a ringing endorsement for him, Catharine. Perhaps you should have something mean about Steve Frank, too, since he has real plans to Make the California Republican Party great again.

The party chair, who will be elected at the state Republican convention this month, is not only the public face of California Republicans, but must raise money to help elect GOP candidates across the state.

Allen has the most name recognition among the three top candidates for chair after his failed run for governor last year. He finished a distant fourth in the June primary, with 10 percent of the vote. But he has a robust social media presence and has tapped into a vein of pro-Trump supporters in the state — even though Trump endorsed another Republican in the governor’s race, San Diego County businessman John Cox.

Trump endorsed Cox because Kevin McCarthy and Company told him too. They believed that John Cox' presence at the top of the ticket would drive up the voter turnout to help other candidates in other races. That didn't happen.

Allen has said he wants to rebuild the Republican Party by stressing “Republican values” instead of the “backward thinking” of trying to act more like Democrats. It’s hard to get to the right of him on most issues.

During his campaign for governor, Allen said “the verdict is still out on climate change” as “it will take quite some time for the science to be settled on this.” He promised that he would “cut taxes, get tough on crime, fix our roads and expand our freeways with no new taxes, fix our broken education system, and complete the California state water project.” He offered few policy details beyond his promises to “fix” and “get tough,” even on his campaign website.

What's the alternative, though? Letting everything fall apart and being soft on everything?

He focuses much of his ire on “Bay Area elites” like Gov. Gavin Newsom and House Speaker Nancy Pelosi for ruining the state with liberal ideas.

Baker said the GOP needs to articulate a more positive vision of California’s future. But most troubling of all for Baker is Allen’s argument that Republicans must “support our Republican president.”


Supporting Trump would be “a path to death for the Republican Party” in California, Baker said.

Yet Trump's campaign promises are the only ones that will keep the country in one place. We have to balance our budgets, secure our borders, protect life and family. The conservative worldview is the only view which will conserve the world. The truth is that we must advocate for these values as much as possible. We need to make the case and remove the power differentials which have made Big Government and Big Handouts the big winners in one election after another.

Allen defended his support of Trump, telling The Chronicle in an email that “Republicans in California didn’t lose because our country has the best economy in decades or record low unemployment. We didn’t lose because we’ve fixed international trade deals or strengthened our military. Republicans in California lost because the California Democrats out planned, out spent, and out executed the establishment Republican Party.”

These assessments are accurate across the board. The problem is that Democrats are better organized and they have continued gaming the election system in their favor. The latest example is the automatic voter-motor law, ballot-harvesting, and rank voter fraud.

Baker thinks it was more than a case of the GOP being outhustled. In California, at least, the party has to embrace comprehensive immigration reform instead of lining up only behind Trump’s plan for a wall on the Mexican border, she said. Most Republicans say they don’t want to address the question of the nation’s 11 million undocumented residents until its borders are secure. But Baker says Republicans must do both and must give undocumented immigrants a way to become citizens.

Here's the problem, Catharine. Ronald Reagan tried that approach, and what ended up happening was that all the illegals received amnesty, and there was no border security afterwards. This is all wrong. We must secure the border. Period. Any talk about amnesty or reform is meaningless apart from following through on the border wall and the enforcement of all immigration laws.

“If our party can’t come to terms with that — and I mean immediately — we are done in California,” she said.

The problem is much bigger than the party politics, sadlly.

The other area where Republicans are seriously out of touch with the state is the environment, Baker said. She was one of seven Assembly Republicans in 2017 to support then-Gov. Jerry Brown’s extension of the state’s cap-and-trade program to combat climate change. It’s a market-based approach to curbing greenhouse gas emissions, under which companies must buy permits for every metric ton of gas they emit. Baker said Republicans should recognize that it’s better than heavy-handed government regulation.



Cap and Trade is a total scam, a total fraud, and it's wrong that she went along with this hoax. The Republicans all should have refused to budge and help pass that travesty. They had the votes to hold it back. They could have joined with a handful of Democrats in really tight re-election bids and prevented the program from passing.

But instead, those seven Republicans in the state assembly caved and extended the program. Is it any surprise that so many people refuse to vote for Republicans?

But Republicans excoriated Baker and the other GOP lawmakers who backed Brown’s measure, calling them traitors. Chad Mayes, who led the party in the Assembly, was forced to resign his leadership post over it.

The force of removing Chad Mayes from power did not amount to much, sadly. Brian Dahle has not been much better. So much selling out, so much going along with the rest of the status quo, and with so little to show for it.

“I thought it was one of the most conservative votes I cast in my four years in the Legislature,” Baker said. “We offered a solution that’s consistent with our principles, and the pitchforks came out. You would have thought that Republicans were anti-environment.”

What a load of crap. There is nothing conservative about approving and advancing Cap and Trade. Nothing at all.

It’s hard to see a political future for someone like Baker. Her state party is largely to the right of her and seems to think its biggest problem is that it’s not conservative enough. There were once enough Democrats open to the idea of electing a moderate Republican, but Baker’s experience shows that may no longer be true.

Baker, however, isn’t discouraged. She’s working as a lawyer now, still in her old district, and pondering her next political step.

“My time in public service,” she said, “is not over.”

Final Reflection

It's not fair to blame Trump for everything, for anything, or even for something.

The fact is that this country needs to secure its borders, and the wall is the best way to do that. California has turned into the officious mess it finds itself in precisely because of the rampant illegal immigration and open border policies.

Republicans did not fight hard enough to secure the border, to stop illegal immigration, to put the needs of Americans, of California citizens first.

Now the voter electorate and the corruption of the voting system may be so great, that there is no partisan solution left. California Republican Party Chairmen are offering more than voter registration programs at this point. They are actively discussing filing lawsuits and enjoining the terrible laws which have adulterated the voter franchise.

Ballot harvesting flipped four seats in Orange County, the Northern LA County seat, plus the two other GOP-held seats in the Central Valley. The fact is that Democrats are out-hustling, cheating at the ballot box.

No amount of moving to the political center, no amount of going Democrat is going to fix these problems. We need to enhance our outreach, sure, but the corruption, the daed voters, the fraud, the illegal alien voters and registrants, all of that needs to be taken care of, too.

If Republicans cannot win in California, at this point we cannot blame the partisan divide only. The cultural breakdown is a big part of it, too. The progressive temperament which has overtaken this state may require a cultural restoration to emerge before anything else.

Sunday, July 16, 2017

Which RINOs Are Voting to Crap and Raid California Taxpayers? Who INDEED?

So ...

Democrats in the California State Assembly have 55 members.

They only need 54 to pass anything with a supermajority vote.

BUT! ...

They are down one vote because Jimmy Gomez just got elected to Congress. The caucus loses one vote.

Uh Oh!

Jimmy Gomez to the state assembly: "Bye Felicia!"

That was a big part of the reason why Jimmy Boy wasn't in a hurry to go to Congress, and why it took him one month to get sworn in!

Shameful, but true.

So ...

California's Democratic assembly needs four 54 votes to pass the Cap and Trade deal.

So, why do they need Republicans so bad?

Because the following Democrats fear for their careers if they vote for it:

My name is Rudy. I'm more Republican than you!

1. Rudy Salas--who is more Republican than some of the Republicans in Sacramento. Without a doubt, he will vote no on this terrible deal.

Please, please don't make me vote on Cap and Trade!
NO!
2. Sharon Quirk-Silva, who is an endangered incumbent in North Orange County. She should not have won in the first place!

Cap and Trade? What's that?! Won't vote for it!
3. Sabrina Cervantes. In Election 2016, all of a sudden, this young lady unseated Republican Eric Linder in the 60th Assembly District. She does not want to risk another upset against her in 2018.

Cap and Trade Vote?! No! Please don't  make me! NO!!

4. Lo and behold, Al Muratsuchi is voting no on the Crap and Raid deal, too! He ran and hid from the State Assembly Speaker Anthony Rendon to block the vote--but he could not get away.

What a shameful bag of useless bones. Who needs an assemblyman with no guts to vote against the party and vote for his constituents?! Please, South Bay, get rid of his guy! I don't want this fearful little man representing me anymore!

So, The Democratic Caucus has about 50 votes for the deal, but needs four more, and they don't have Jimmy Gomez to help them out anymore! They only have 54!!!

So, which Republicans are planning to squish?



1. Chad Mayes, the Cap and Traitor. We have gone after him at length.



2. Rocky The RINOS Chavez. This guy is termed out, I believe, and wants to go Cannella on all of us.



3. Frank Bigelow. This name really surprises me. After all, the guy represents a very red section of northeastern California, including Mariposa County.

What is the matter with this guy? Too many cow farts, I guess.



4. Catharine Baker--boy, this is really disappointing. Who would have thought that winning a Republican in East Bay would turn into such a double-edged sword?

By the way, what do these four people have in common?

They are all bought and paid for by ... Charles  Munger Jr!!!



OUCH!

No more Sell outs! NO MORE RINOS!



Give them everything you can!

Here are the squishy RINOs' contact information:

Baker:



Bigelow:




Chavez:




Mayes:



And just to make sure that the Demo-RATS remember that their career is in your hands

Cervantes:


Capitol Office
State Capitol
Sacramento, CA 94249-0060
(916) 319-2060
(916) 319-2160 fax
District Office:
4740 Green River Road, Suite 310-311,
Corona, CA 92880
(951) 371-6860 

Muratsuchi: 
Capitol Office:
State Capitol
P.O. Box 942849
Room 2179
Sacramento, CA 94249-0066
(916) 319-2066
(916) 319-2166 fax
District Office:
23211 Hawthorne Blvd.
Suite 200A
Torrance, CA 90505
(310) 375-0691
 

Quirk-Silva:
Capitol Office:
State Capitol - Room # 6012
Sacramento, CA 94249
Phone: 916-319-2065
Fax: 916-319-2165
District Office:
On the campus of Gilbert West High School
6855 La Palma Ave, Buena Park, CA 90620
Mailing address: PO Box 6256, Buena Park, CA 90622
Phone: (714) 521-6505 

Salas:
Capitol Office:
State Capitol
P.O. Box 942849
Sacramento, CA 94249-0032
Tel: (916) 319-2032
Fax: (916) 319-2132
Bakersfield Office:
1430 Truxtun Avenue, Suite 803
Bakersfield, CA 93301
Tel: (661) 335-0302
Fax: (661) 335-0361
Hanford Office:
113 Court Street, Suite 201
Hanford, CA 93230
Tel: (559) 585-7170
Fax: (559) 585-7175

Thursday, March 16, 2017

Assemblywoman Baker: No More Attacks on Second Amendment Rights. Pull AB 1525 NOW!

The last thing that the state of California needs is more Republicans voting like Democrats and thug going against the best interests of their constituents.

Let me repeat: the Democratic Party which has taken control of the state legislature and the governor's mansion does not have the best interests of California citizens at heart. They want to do the bidding of the selected corrupt interests which own all the power.

They are the ones who are donating the time and connecting all the resources to fatten their own wallets and expand their limited, illiberal influence.

No, the last thing that we need is any legislator pushing a destructive, progressive agenda.

This is all just plain outrageous.

And yet ....

Republicans last year and the year before are voting for these perverse policies which hurt working people and attack our individual liberties.

I had high hopes that even Republicans in more liberal areas would do the right thing as much as they could for their representatives and for the Republican Party.

Instead of voting in the better interests of her constituents and in line with the United States Constitution, Assemblywoman Catharine Baker (R-Dublin) has gone along with her liberal colleagues and voted against the party platform and best values for the state.

She voted for SB 1146!

She also voted for AB 32!

When does this criminal insanity stop?!

And now she is actively pushing a bill to further curtail Second Amendment rights in the state of California.

Check out her latest bill AB 1525:

LEGISLATIVE COUNSEL’S DIGEST

AB 1525, as introduced, Baker. Firearms warnings.

This bill is the most triggery of trigger warnings.

And yes, pun intended.

Do we really need to tell gun owners and purchasers that guns kill people?

Really?!

And yet that is exactly what this legislation requires:

Existing law requires prescribed warnings on the packaging of any firearm and descriptive materials that accompany a firearm sold or transferred in the state by a licensed manufacturer or licensed dealer. Existing law also requires prescribed warnings to be posted within the premises of a licensed firearms dealer. Existing law requires the Department of Justice to develop an instructional manual to be made available to licensed firearms dealers, who are required to make it available to the public.

So, there are all of these great laws already in place about firearm safety.

Why do we need more, Catharine? Why?!

This bill would require a specified statement relating to the risks of firearms and the laws regulating firearms to be included in the warnings on the packaging of firearms and descriptive materials that accompany firearms, on the premises of a licensed dealer, and in the instructional manual developed by the department The bill would require additional specified warnings to be included at the premises of a licensed firearms dealer.

More gobbledy-gook. Men and women who purchase firearms follow extensive training.

"I will pass a bill that Democrats will like ..."

This bill is another sop to the "progressive" impulses running wild in her district.

Catharine, the Republican Party of California is dying fast, and your dithering with the Left is only hastening the demise. This kind of behavior is just plain wrong.

The Second Amendment is facing unprecedented attack. Do we really need both sides of the aisle attacking the Second Amendment rights of every Californian?

Crimes are up. Property damage is up. The rampant lawlessness which defines third world countries has become a growing norm in Southern California, and has become a staple of daily life in some Northern California municipalities.

Existing law requires the department to develop a written objective test for the issuance of a firearm safety certificate, which is generally required for the purchase or receipt of a firearm. A passing grade to be issued a firearms safety certificate is at least 75%. Existing law requires the department to update the testing material for the firearm safety certificate test every five years.


This bill, instead, would require a specified warning to be given to a person who takes the firearms safety certificate examination and would make a passing grade on the firearms safety certificate test at least 85%. The bill would also require the applicant to acknowledge receipt of the prescribed warning prior to issuance of the firearm safety certificate. The bill would require the department to update the testing material at least once every five years.

Does Baker own a firearm? Does she have any right, any business dictating to gun owners how high the Second Amendment test should be?

Her argument for doing this?

"The Democrats in the state legislature will like this bill. If I do not submit something like this, then they Democrats will put in their own bill, which will be much worse!"

They can submit any bill they want to regardless.

This kind of stupidity is not logic.

This kind of thinking does not help the Republican Party pick fights.

It just shows that Republicans in Sacramento are not interested in fighting at all!

Call Catharine Baker's office, and demand that she pull this misguided, abusive bill!

CAPITOL OFFICE: State Capitol, Suite 2130, Sacramento, CA 94249 | 916-319-2016
DISTRICT OFFICE: 2440 Camino Ramon, Suite 345, San Ramon, CA 94583 | 925-328-1515

Saturday, June 11, 2016

Hadley's "Defense" for Illegal Alien Waiver

Assemblyman David Hadley wrote me the following letter following his vote for SB 10:

"I agree with you, I do not believe that California taxpayers should be subsidizing health insurance for illegal residents.

"SB 10 does not provide subsidized or free health insurance to such residents, nor does it ask the Federal government to do so."

This thinking is all wrong.

Because individuals no longer have to prove or demonstrate any kind of legal status, those individuals who fall below a certain poverty line will ... guess what? ... get federal subsidies for Obamacare.

The whole exchange is based on federal monies, taken from taxpayers without their permission to finance a failing encroachment of the state into health care.

This whole mess needs to be shut down not expanded.

"What SB 10 proposes is that California request a waiver from the Federal government allowing illegal residents to purchase health insurance on the exchange without taxpayer subsidies."

Nope. See above.

By the way, millions of Californians are suffering from terrible access to health care. Medical professionals are leaving their careers, the state, or both because of the exorbitant costs and unreal demands of stretching too few resources for more people, many of whom should not live in this country in the first place.

"As a state legislator who cares about border security, I face an impossible dilemma. On the one hand, the Supreme Court has ruled that states such as California cannot adopt our own immigration policies or even enforce Federal laws."

And? The Supreme Court has issued bad, false, unconstitutional rulings before. The state of Texas, Alabama, and Arizona have followed their own paths to secure their borders, whether the federal government likes it or not.

"The state legislature does not get to decide who lives here."

The state legislature can enact policies to remove the negative enticements for illegal aliens who want to live here.

"And yet I legislate on nay matters that touch on illegal residents and on the health and safety of citizens, legal residents, and illegal residents. Further, both as a matter of state law and on humanitarian grounds emergency rooms do not deny care to patients in need regardless of their immigration status."

The difficult predicament of our medical facilities still does not justify opening the doors of Obamacare to illegal aliens.

David Hadley


This argument wears thin: "They are already here, so we might as well accommodate them." No! With that kind of logic, should we open up all the prisons and let the drug dealers, burglars, and murderers continue to commit crimes, too?

"It is good for our citizens, legal residents, and healthcare providers that illegal residents buy subsidized health insurance coverage."

Guess what? Legal residents are not buying health insurance, because they cannot afford it. The state health insurance exchange is going bust. One of the main insurance providers is exiting out of the entire program, pretty much ensuring that the whole insurance scheme falls apart.

And those illegal aliens will still take advantage of California emergency rooms, if there are any left.

The same pandering has resorted to similar logic about drivers licenses for illegal aliens. "They are already here, so we need to allow them the opportunity to get a driver's license to keep our streets safe,"

Our streets are not safer. Neither will our hospitals, both from a fiscal as well as a moral standpoint.

"I can assure you that I will oppose subsidizing the insurance policies of illegal residents."

If that were the case, then David Hadley would not have voted for SB 10.

Contact David Hadley's office, and tell him your disappointment over SB 10, and his need to stop illegal immigration to the state of California, end the negative inducements with taxpayer dollars.

CAPITOL OFFICE
State Capitol
Sacramento, CA 94249
(916) 319-2066
(916) 319-2166 fax

DISTRICT OFFICE
23211 Hawthorne Blvd., Suite 200A
Torrance, CA 90505
(310) 375-0691

(310) 375-8245 fax

Please also these contact these two lawmakers for voting for SB 10, and tell them that they made a huge mistake:

Catharine Baker


Catharine Baker

CAPITOL OFFICE
State Capitol
Sacramento, CA 94249
(916) 319-2016
(916) 319-2116 fax

DISTRICT OFFICE
2440 Camino Ramon, Suite 345
San Ramon, CA 94583
(925) 328-1515
(925) 328-1514 fax


Eric Linder


Eric Linder

Capitol Office
State Capitol, Room 2016
Sacramento, CA 94249-0060
(916) 319-2060
(916) 319-2160 fax

DISTRICT OFFICE
4740 Green River Road, Suite 311
Corona, CA 92880
(951) 371-6860
(951) 734-4160 fax

Wednesday, May 11, 2016

Obamacare for CA Illegal Aliens? Hell No! (Vote NO on SB 10)

California State Senator Ricardo Lara (D-Huntington Park) is a disgrace to the state legislature.

He is a disgrace to the human race, as well.

Many of the bills he submits to the legislature are designed to erode the blessed distinctions between citizen and illegal alien.

Citizenship is a prized status, one which no one should diminish or remove.

Yet Lara insists on taking money from taxpayers and subsidizing illegal aliens.

Here is the legislative summary:


SB 10, as amended, Lara. Health care coverage: immigration status.

Existing law, the federal Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act (PPACA), requires each state to establish an American Health Benefit Exchange that facilitates the purchase of qualified health plans by qualified individuals and qualified small employers, and meets certain other requirements. PPACA specifies that an individual who is not a citizen or national of the United States or an alien lawfully present in the United States shall not be treated as a qualified individual and may not be covered under a qualified health plan offered through an exchange. Existing law creates the California Health Benefit Exchange (the Exchange) for the purpose of facilitating the enrollment of qualified individuals and qualified small employers in qualified health plans as required under PPACA.

Notice the numbers of times the above passage repeats "qualified". The problem is that the health insurance is not quality for many patients (if any), since more doctors are refusing to accept those payments. Clients have also complained about the rising costs and the premiums which follow.

Thanks, Obamacare!

What's the point in forcing people to purchase health insurance, when the policies are not accepted, and end up costing far more? Whatever happened to "If you like your doctor, you can keep your doctor?" 


This bill would require the Secretary of California Health and Human Services to apply to the United States Department of Health and Human Services for a waiver to allow individuals who are not eligible to obtain health coverage through the Exchange because of their immigration status to obtain coverage from the Exchange. The bill would require, after that waiver has been granted, the Exchange to offer California qualified health benefit plans, as specified, to these individuals. The bill would require that individuals eligible to purchase California qualified health plans pay the cost of coverage without federal assistance.

The state legislature is begging the federal government for a waiver to allow illegal aliens to get access to California's state healthcare exchange.

Let's also be honest. These illegals are going to get federal subsidies. Bet on it. Who can forget Congressman Joe Wilson calling out one of Obama's many lies during his 2010 State of the Union Address?




Has anyone been reading the papers lately? Obamacare is going straight to hell. The premiums are skyrocketing, year after year. State exchanges have closed up all over the country. Private insurance carriers are jumping out and letting the who corrupt system collapse.

Working families find that they have to forgo their private plans and put up with the nightmare of Covered California, now uncovered to be dismal and dysfunctional.

And the greatest insult: Why are we subsidizing the presence of illegal aliens in the state of California?

Illegal aliens need to be deported, not subsidized.

This is outrageous.

So, what can we do?

Good news has emerged. In order for the legislation to pass SB 10, two-thirds of both chambers must approve the bill.

If the Republicans show some courage and vote against this financial and moral atrocity, then Lara and his Hispandering cohorts will lose another opportunity to erode citizenship.

Contacts within Sacramento have informed me, however, that the Republican caucus will not hold strong against this bill. One Sacramento staffer informed We the People Rising that even if all the Republicans voted against the bill, it will still pass ...

That is not true. Republicans elected to the state legislature took up more than 1/3 of the seats. They stopped the supermajority, and all the taxes during the 2015 legislative session.

Now, which Republicans need the extra attention, to ensure that they vote the right way, and stop this terrible, insane piece of legislation?

STATE ASSEMBLY

Contact these lawmakers immediately and tell them to vote NO! ON SB 10:

Catharine Baker

CAPITOL OFFICE
State Capitol
Sacramento, CA 94249
(916) 319-2016
(916) 319-2116 fax

DISTRICT OFFICE
2440 Camino Ramon, Suite 345
San Ramon, CA 94583
(925) 328-1515
(925) 328-1514 fax

Catharine Baker: she is in a tough reelection fight. The last thing that the East Bay region needs is  more pilfering from taxpayers, already struggling in their long commutes to the City.

Brian Maienschein

CAPITOL OFFICE
State Capitol
Sacramento, CA 94249
916-319-2077
916-319-2177 fax

SAN DIEGO DISTRICT OFFICE
12396 World Trade Drive
Suite #118
San Diego, CA 92128
858-675-0077
858-675-0688 fax


Brian Maienschein: a social moderate. He needs to be reminded that he works for We the Citizens of California. Tell him to vote NO! on SB 10.

Chad Mayes

CAPITOL OFFICE
State Capitol
Sacramento, CA 94249
(916) 319-2042
(916) 319-2142 fax

RANCHO MIRAGE DISTRICT OFFICE
41608 Indian Trail, Suite 1
Rancho Mirage, CA 92270
(760) 346-6342
(760) 346-6506 (fax)

Chad Mayes: The Assembly minority leader has been talking more about reaching out to poor communities and helping Californians get off their feet and prosper. Remind him to put Americans first, to make the needs of Californians--citizens--preeminent!


CAPITOL OFFICE
State Capitol
Sacramento, CA 94249
(916) 319-2066
(916) 319-2166 fax

DISTRICT OFFICE
23211 Hawthorne Blvd., Suite 200A
Torrance, CA 90505
(310) 375-0691
(310) 375-8245 fax

David Hadley: Give him a call, and tell him to stay true to his libertarian, fiscally prudent core. A reminder to all voters: he voted against SB 4!

Rocky Chavez

CAPITOL OFFICE
State Capitol Room 2170
Sacramento, CA 94249
916-319-2076
916-319-2176 fax

DISTRICT OFFICE
804 Pier View Way, Suite 100
Oceanside, CA 92054
(760) 433-7601
(760) 433-7607 fax

Rocky Chavez: Will he cave, just as he caved on SB 4, which opened Medi-Cal to illegal alien youth last year? He needs to be reminded that a primary challenger is already ready to take-h down as a write-in candidate.

Katcho

CAPITOL OFFICE
State Capitol
Sacramento, CA 94249
(916) 319-2035
(916) 319-2135 fax

SAN LUIS OBISPO DISTRICT OFFICE
1150 Osos Street , Suite #207
San Luis Obispo, CA 93401
(805) 549-3381
(805) 549-3400 fax


Katcho Achadjian: I have a little more hope about this guy. he is starting to vote more conservative, since he is running for Congress, in CD-24)

Kristin Olsen
CAPITOL OFFICE
State Capitol
Sacramento, CA 94249
916-319-2012
916-319-2112 fax

DISTRICT OFFICE
3719 Tully Road, Suite C
Modesto, CA 95356
209-576-6425
209-576-6426 fax


Kirstin Olsen: she has caved too many times on tax increases. She needs to prove to all of us that she will stand her ground with the citizens of this state and vote NO!

And -- call some Democrats:




Capitol Office:
State Capitol
P.O. Box 942849
Sacramento, CA 94249-0069
Tel: (916) 319-2069
Fax: (916) 319-2169

District Office:
2400 East Katella Avenue, Suite 640
Anaheim, CA 92806
Tel: (714) 939-8469
Fax: (714) 939-8986

Tom Daly (Santa Ana):he voted against $15 wage hike. He is in a moderate/swing district in the Orange County region. We the People Rising have been more active in Orange County, reminding city councils and all other elected officials to respect the rule of law and cooperate with federal immigration authorities.

Another Democrat in the San Bernardino area needs to stop this illegal immigration insanity: Cheryl Brown.

Cheryl Brown

Capitol Office:
State Capitol
P.O. Box 942849
Sacramento, CA 94249-0047
Tel: (916) 319-2047
Fax: (916) 319-2147

District Office
290 North D Street, Suite 903
San Bernardino, CA 92401
Tel: (909) 381-3238
Fax: (909) 885-8589

Satellite Office
Fontana City Hall
8353 Sierra Ave, Heritage Rm
Fontana, CA 92335
Tel: (909) 350-7646

If there is any area which has harmed by illegal immigration, it is San Bernardino.

Instead of placating her left-wing colleagues, she needs to better respond to the interests of individual taxpayers, families, and small business owners.



STATE SENATE

Anthony Cannella

Capitol Office
State Capitol, Room 5082
Sacramento, CA 95814
Phone: 916.651.4012
Fax: 916.651-4912


Ceres Office
2561 3rd Street, Suite A
Ceres, CA 95307
Phone: (209) 581-9827
Fax: (209) 581-9832

Merced Office
1640 N Street, Suite 210
Merced, CA 95340
Phone: (209) 726-5495
Fax: (209) 726-5498



Salinas Office
369 Main Street, Suite 208
Salinas, CA 93901
Phone: (831) 769-8040

Anthony Cannella has caved too many times on "illegal alien" legislation. Expanding the strain on the already overburdened Obamacare state exchanges is just plain wrong. Tell him NO! on SB 10!

Andy Vidak

Capitol
State Capitol, Room 3082
Sacramento, CA 95814
Phone: 916.651.4014
Fax: 916.651.4914

Fresno
2550 Mariposa Mall, Suite 2016
Fresno, CA 93721
Phone: 559.264.3070
  
Bakersfield
1201 E. California Avenue, Suite A
Bakersfield, CA 93307
Phone: 661.395.2620

  
Hanford
113 Court Street, Suite 205
Hanford, CA 93230
Phone: 559.585.7161

Vidak has voted on the wrong side of immigration bills a few times. This must cease. The last thing the state of California needs is more illegal immigration. No more pandering!


And finally, the former senate minority leader, Bob Huff.


Capitol
State Capitol, Room 4090
Sacramento, CA 95814
Phone: 916.651.4029
Fax: 916.651.4929

Brea
1800 E. Lambert Road, Suite 150
Brea, CA 92821
Phone: 714.671.9474
Fax: 714.671.9750

He has disappointed conservatives on a number of votes. He has voted for gun control, and continued along with a number of members in the legislature to expand privileges to illegal aliens.

Does this guy want any change at becoming the successor to Mike Antonovich on the Los Angeles County Board of Supervisors? He needs to vote NO! on SB 10!

Final Reflection:

Obamacare should never have passed in the first place.

The last thing that any state should do is expand access to the state exchanges for ILLEGAL ALIENS!

Call the above legislators, and let them know:

California Republicans, Stand Together:
VOTE "NO" ON SB 10!