Showing posts with label hate speech. Show all posts
Showing posts with label hate speech. Show all posts

Sunday, August 7, 2022

Obsessed Granny Groomer Kelly Stuart Shows Racist Colors: Calls Black People "Welfare Queens"



Kelly "Karen, Granny Groomer" Stuart of El Segundo is obsessed with me and she has been following and reading and sharing my blog! 

So much winning! This is "Living in the Libs' Heads Rent-Free" on hyperdrive! 

 Check out her latest tweet:

This is the post that she is complaining about

"Shut Up, Melina!" Abdullah Slams Koretz for Doing His Job 

For those who don't know, Melina Abdullah is a black supremacist professor at Cal State Los Angeles. She is a vile, and violent, agitator in the city of Los Angeles and throughout Los Angeles County. She is also pretty corrupt, since in the LA BOS Fight for District Two in 2020 between Herb Wesson and Holly Mitchell, Abdullah went with Herb Wesson, who was the more establishment, swampy Democrat running to replace Mark Ridley-Thomas.


In my blog, I called Melina a "welfare queen." And she is! She gets big money from the government to do ... nothing worthwhile or contributory or compensatory for her community or the county.

And yet, for some reason, Kelly Stuart thinks that my comment is an "anti-Black slur."

Why does she associate welfare with "black"?

That is racist!

Kelly Stuart thinks that black people are predominantly welfare queens. That is so hateful! It is so disgusting. However, I can't say that I am surprised that she would write something like that. Antifa Karens like Kelly Stuart and her other left-wing hater cohorts often look down on Black, Hispanic, and Asian people. They have all sorts of stereotypes about people who do not look like them.

And here we have further proof that Kelly "Granny Grooner" Stuart is a racist.

Please report her Twitter feed. (Click here)

Please also start reporting her LinkedIn page.

She is running scared, she is really panicking, and yes, she is totally obsessed with me now.

She has been tweeting about me and my blog for the last week straight:

And: 


And this:



And this

And here is my final comment, an open letter to Kelly Stuart:

Dear Karen Kelly, I know that you are reading this blog, and I just want you to know that more people are reading up about you and the rest of your hateful, fascist Antifa klan throughout Los Angeles County. Thanks for telling people to report this blog, because it just means that more trafficking visits this site.

Please keep letting people know about these blog posts, because more people are reading about you and finding out the truth. Thanks again!



Sunday, June 24, 2018

Oh Canada! Pro-Family Activist Charged with National Hate Crimes for Free Speech

Pro-family activist in Canada under bizarre nationwide arrest warrant -- for passing out ‘anti-LGBT’ flyers. Will turn himself in to police Friday.

Canadian MassResistance ally Bill Whatcott charged in two “hate speech” cases. Being sued by “gays” for $104 million.

Protest planned outside Calgary Police Dept by churches as Whatcott arrives.

Is this what the future of the United States looks like?

June 21, 2018

Bill Whatcott, an extraordinary pro-family activist in a hostile country!

What is happening in Canada this week should be frightening to all of us.
Here in the United States the government tries to force businesses to make “gay” wedding cakes and schools to have “transgender” restrooms. But in Canada, that train is much further down the tracks. It leads us to wonder: Is this our future?

Earlier this week Bill Whatcott, long-time anti-abortion and pro-family activist and MassResistance Canadian ally, was suddenly informed that there is now a national criminal arrest warrant issued for him – for a supposed “hate speech” crime that took place two years ago in Toronto!

"To be honest I am still shocked myself,” he told MassResistance. The "crime"? “My ministry bringing the Gospel and the truth about homosexuality to Toronto’s homosexual pride parade in 2016.”

“I’ve indeed been persecuted for using accurate MassResistance resources for years,” he says.

So now Whatcott is being dragged into courts in two provinces on criminal “hate speech” charges. For one of the incidents he is also being sued by homosexual activists for $104 million.

All of this for simply passing out pamphlets that the LGBT movement doesn’t like.

National Arrest Warrant shocks supporters

The unusual action of a national arrest warrant being issued against Whatcott — especially for something fairly minor that took place two years ago — has shocked his supporters.  As Whatcott’s lawyer, Charles Lugosi, told The Toronto Star:
Usually, a Canada-wide warrant is issued with somebody alleged to have committed a very serious crime, like murder. Normally, with something like this, it’s never done. It’s abnormal.
Also, Whatcott has appeared when summoned in the past, and his lawyer has made it clear that he intends continue to cooperate with the police now, though he will certainly challenge every charge against him.

According to published reports, the Attorney General of Ontario personally authorized the criminal charge against Whatcott.

Why did they wait two years before charging him with a crime? It’s not clear at all. According to The Toronto Star:

[Toronto police spokesperson Const. Caroline de Kloet] said part of the reason the warrant was issued two years after the incidents is because police had to “liaise” with the prosecution to approve the charge.

This clearly demonstrates the power of the LGBT movement in Canada.

Whatcott to turn himself in to police on Friday – amid protest


Whatcott has announced that he will turn himself in at a Calgary police station at 10:00 a.m. on Friday morning, June 22. Local churches have also announced that there will be a protest outside the police station to support him.

Members of the Toronto police "hate crime" unit have reportedly already traveled Calgary and will transport him to Toronto.

What did Whatcott do?


Bill Whatcott’s current “hate speech” charges are from two incidents where he handed out flyers that the LGBT movement didn’t like: (1) the 2016 Toronto Gay Pride Parade, which resulted in this latest arrest warrant for a criminal charge and also attracted a $104 million civil lawsuit; and (2) the 2017 British Columbia provincial elections where a man purporting to be a woman ran for Parliament and lost after Whatcott exposed him as a phony “woman.”

The 2016 Toronto Gay Pride Parade


In July 2016, Whatcott used an assumed name to successfully register to march in the Toronto Gay Pride Parade. He and a group of supporters called themselves “The Gay Zombies Cannabis Consumers Association,” wore green body suits, and handed out approximately 3,000 “zombie safe sex” packets.  

Marching in the Toronto Gay Pride Parade. Note the naked men right behind them.
Inside each packet was a folded up two-sided flyer that included medical-related information, plus graphic images of anal warts, genital warts, and a blotched corpse labeled an “AIDS fatality.” It also criticized the Prime Minister and other Canadian political figures for their homosexual activism, and how they have led Canada “on a destructive journey toward sexual anarchy and homosexual inspired oppression.”

The "safe sex" packet with the flyer inside. They passed out 3,000 of these that day!
A month after the parade, homosexual activists filed a civil lawsuit charging defamation and “hate speech.” They asked for an absurd $104 million in damages to various LGBT groups. They demanded that not only Whatcott but the other marchers in the group (who have never been identified) and anyone who supported the effort financially or otherwise be held liable. This was obviously done not only to bankrupt as many pro-family people as possible, but to frighten any others who might also hand out pamphlets against the LGBT agenda.

The lawsuit would also ban Whatcott and his group from leafletting or even posting their information on a website. It would also ban them from marching in any “gay pride” parade.
A judge later ruled that the plaintiffs could not claim defamation for an entire group, only individuals, but that the lawsuit could go forward. He also ordered Whatcott to disclose the names of the other “zombies” who marched as well as all their financial backers. Whatcott’s lawyer is appealing that order.

Such a lawsuit demanding “damages” be paid to the homosexuals seemed particularly hypocritical because the parade itself was a disgusting display of full nudity (particularly by males) and include a large dose of bigoted anti-Catholic and general anti-Christian imagery, according to photos of the event that we’ve seen. But the judges and other officials simply ignore that.

Toronto Gay Pride Parade participants. Exposing one's sexual organs to a child is a crime there (as it is just about everywhere else). But the police and authorities simply ignored that and went after Bill Whatcott's pamphlets.

Whatcott’s lawyer filed a very well-written defense brief that makes a very good argument that the parade was a state-funded and basically political event, where all views should be allowed. But the judge, not surprisingly, ignored those points.

(The current warrant for Whatcott's arrest is on a criminal charge of "hate speech" at the Toronto parade.)

Some of the Canadian-based media has written about this (the best is from LifeSiteNews):

Exposing a British Columbia "transgender" politician

A second trial for “hate speech” awaits Whatcott in early September 2018 before the British Columbia Human Rights Tribunal (i.e., “kangaroo court”).

Bill Whatcott is going to trial in B.C. for simply stating the truth. Incredibly, the judge has already said that the truth is not a legitimate defense in this case! Could this happen here eventually?

He distributed a flyer in 2017 criticizing a male-to-female transsexual running for Parliament. Whatcott simply alerted voters that the Vancouver socialist candidate was a biological man, not the woman he claimed to be.

I am writing this flyer this election to share my concern about the promotion and growth of homosexuality and transvestitism in British Columbia and how it is obscuring the immutable truth about our God given gender.

The truth is there are only two genders, male and female and they are God given and unchangeable. Ronan may have government ID that refers to him by the French female name “Morgane” and the media, NDP, and everyone in the riding might try to pretend Ronan is a woman. But the truth is Ronan's DNA will always be male, he will never have a uterus, and no amount of cosmetic surgery, fake hormones, or media propaganda is going to be able to change these facts.

“God created man in His own image, in the image of God He created him; male and female He created them.” Genesis 1:27
An interesting question: Will the Toronto police let him out in time for his September hearing in British Columbia?

Whatcott a dedicated activist

Whatcott is used to legal harassment employed against him. He has been subject to other “hate” charges, including a case that went all the way to the Canada Supreme Court (decided in 2013). His flyers in question were entitled, "Keep Homosexuality out of Saskatoon's Public Schools!" and "Sodomites in our Public Schools."

Reading the articles about how the Court decided this issue conjures George Orwell – or Alice in Wonderland. The logic is confounding on how the Canadians determine what “hate” legally is. The flyers contained documented facts about homosexual behavior backed up by peer-reviewed studies. They also included the term “sodomite” which obviously distressed the Court.
See media reports:

What is Canadian “hate speech”?

As we have seen in the United States, so-called “hate speech” has no firm definition except what the liberal establishment decides it doesn’t like. 
In Canada, hate speech is indictable under Section 319 of Canada’s Criminal Codeand carries a punishment of up to two years imprisonment and possible forfeitures. The offenses include:
  1. Public incitement of hatred – “communicating statements in any public place, incites hatred against any identifiable group where such incitement is likely to lead to a breach of the peace,” or
  2. Willful promotion of hatred – “communicating statements, other than in private conversation, willfully promotes hatred against any identifiable group”
Permitted defenses:
No person shall be convicted of an offence under sub-section (2):
  1. if he establishes that the statements communicated were true;
  2. if, in good faith, the person expressed or attempted to establish by an argument an opinion on a religious subject or an opinion based on a belief in a religious text;
  3. if the statements were relevant to any subject of public interest, the discussion of which was for the public benefit, and if on reasonable grounds he believed them to be true; or
  4. if, in good faith, he intended to point out, for the purpose of removal, matters producing or tending to produce feelings of hatred toward an identifiable group in Canada.
In both cases where he’s being currently charged, Whatcott was simply telling the truth, and was also making legitimate religious arguments. There was no “breach of peace.” Thus, even by their own rules, he should not be held liable. But as in the United States, Canada’s activist judges mold the law as they wish.

Don’t let this happen here!


Obviously, Canada doesn’t have a First Amendment like the US. But as we’ve seen here with the Second Amendment, Constitutional guarantees are very tenuous and can start to disappear pretty easily.

As we say over and over, it’s absolutely critical for people to speak out and tell the truth as frequently as possible. That kind of confrontation forces the oppressors to back down. Otherwise the government simply takes over and fills the void with tyranny. Not enough people in Canada have been doing that, and so Bill Whatcott is taking the brunt of that.
On Friday, Bill Whatcott turns himself in to the Calgary police, amid a protest at the police station. We will have a full report on that!

Friday, March 30, 2018

Breaking: YouTube Strikes Down My Video Against Anti-Semitism for ... Hate Speech!

Yes, it begins.

I can't believe this.

Yesterday (March 29, 2018), I posted a video where I commented on the rising trends of Anti-Semitism emerging on YouTube and among otherwise new conservative, or "Red-pilled" chat groups.

This is ridiculous.

I simply spoke for about ten minutes against the anti-Israel, anti-Zionist sentiment among different alt-right or "conservative" groups. A hostility to Israel has become a new form of chic, as well.

Here's the statement from YouTube:


Here is the video:



I am uploading the video to GAB at this time. It should be ready very soon.

Wednesday, March 28, 2018

YouTube Anti-Free Speech: Community Strike for Hate Speech

Here we go.

After coming off fresh victories in Orange County, first at the Board of Supervisors, next at the City of Mission Viejo, I just received a community strike.

Again.

This is a joke!

Here is the statement from YouTube:


It's a joke for YouTube to claim that they support free speech, but condemn hate speech.

Speech is speech. All this talk about "hate speech" is a hollow fraud to justify shutting people down simply for saying things that people do not agree with or do not like.

Deal with it.

This is outrageous.

I have filed an appeal, which will be rejected.

But it's time to migrate away from YouTube next. We need different applications which will allow us to record events live and post them for everyone to see.

This is outrageous!

By the way ...

Here's the video that to struck down:


Friday, December 8, 2017

It's Over! "Fascist"-Book Bans Me For Good #BoycottFacebook

What a sad day, at least in a nominal sense. There is good news to reap from this devastating development -- to a degree.

Cue ELO:



Facebook not only blocked me on my initial account following my Facebook Live video exposing the McCarty Church promoting illegal immigration and sedition, but Facebook cracked down on my back-up Facebook Account, too.

I tried to open up a third one, and that was shut down within two hours.

I had been blocked from posting and sharing on my original Arthur C. Schaper Facebook account because of my Live video exposing McCarty Church in West Adams hosting an illegal alien town hall.

Facebook called that "bullying."



Give me a break. Exposure of sedition and misconduct in my own country, in my own state is now "hate speech" and "bullying" to Facebook.

This is beyond shameful, and it needs to be exposed.

All my accounts have been disabled, now. This is beyond unreal, the epitome of fascism from a private firm which wants to protect itself from the regulation of the federal government.


The pages are gone, the profiles are gone, everything that I had set up and run is Gone, Gone, Gone.



Fine then. Good riddance.

Fascist book has gone too far, and their desperation will be their undoing.

It's time to Boycott Facebook.


Sunday, November 5, 2017

"Hate Speech!" YouTube Shuts Down LA Trump Rally Video (Please File Complaints!)

This is a total joke.

It's official: YouTube has some fascist, anti-Free Speech hatemongers running the show.

This is beyond ridiculous.

I had already posted my first video of the November 4, 2017 rally of us Trump supporters celebrating his victory.

Here is the first video, I which I featured all of us getting ready for the day's events:



This video shows the basic preparation for our team.

We connected with our leader, Antonio Foreman, to ensure that everyone paid attention and followed directions. The last thing that anyone wants is for someone to get left behind, lost, and then jumped by anti-Trump thugs.

Then I set up the next video, which featured our team protesting and then marching through Downtown Los Angeles.

This video is exciting, and there are lots of great people doing great things.

We are breaking the false narrative about Donald Trump and Trump supporters in blue states and in deep blue cities!

Yet what happened to the video?

It was taken down by YouTube!

Unbelievable!

Check out the "Missing Video" here:




Here are the notices that I received about this video:




Hate speech?

Really?

There was no hate speech--because hate speech DOES NOT EXIST!

This is criminal behavior on YouTube's part, or at least these are civil wrongs which must be confronted head on. This is outrageous.

It's time for all of us to step up and demand that our rights be recognized!

Google, YouTube, Twitter, etc. are all part of the public space, the public sphere.

It is wrong, absolutely wrong for these companies to infringe on the rights of private citizens expressing their views in public.

Especially this half-baked, perverse standard of "Hate Speech". Really?

This is a total joke!

Hate speech does not exist!

Check out Steve Crowder's take on this very thorny issue:



Now, there is hope!

Check out what this friend did for me!



Other people have been more emphatic with YouTube:




Here's how to send in Feedback:



This cannot stand, man!

We cannot allow YouTube to just keep shutting down videos and content that they do not like!

Monday, May 1, 2017

Suck it Up, Buttercups! America is Our Safe Space, Even for Hate Speech (Which Doesn’t Exist)

Fresh off our First Amendment victory in Berkeley, California’s Trump supporters and conservatives around the country rallied to hear President Trump’s 100 Days Celebration Speech.

You know what? He’s doing a great job.

Of course, there are critics. One libertarian-leaning millennial friend of me complained about how Trump spends so much time gloating over accomplishments. My retort? His accomplishments are mine—are our victories. Second, people can pound their chests when they have done great things—Michael Jordan could trash-talk the best on the court because he ended up besting them. Finally, I quipped: “If you don’t like, don’t listen. First Amendment, Baby!”

And about the First Amendment ... Berkeley was a smash-hit success for this sacred right But why? A bunch of conservatives stood their ground in a liberal city. OK, but more importantly, we reasserted that every inch of America is safe space for free speech. Over this past weekend, two insights have re-emerged about these ongoing assaults on free speech.

The first one I had first learned from Ben Shapiro at the University of Redlands. Before his speech, one of the many overpaid campus vice-chancellors announced to the sold-out audience that the university maintained its dedication to diversity, inclusion, and tolerance while opposing the bugaboos of homophobia, xenophobia, and any other fill-in-the-blank phobias. How about ailurophobia for the cat-haters?



Following the disclaimers, conservative wonks enjoyed listening to Benji slaughter the secular leftist sacred cows. The most telling, memorable phrase from his whole talk? “America is a safe space.” Indeed. Safety defined as the right and opportunity to speak one’s mind and pursue happiness free from arbitrary sanctions or suppression. Liberty is not a magic word to justify invidious discrimination, but a state of being absent the opposing confines of government force and fiat. If you don’t like what you hear, you are free not to listen. You are not entitled, however, to shut down someone else’s exercise of liberty, whether in speech, the press, individual conscience, etc.  America is indeed a safe space, you liberal pussy-hat wearing snowflakes. In third-world, communist countries, you are forced to listen to the party line’s dogma and dreck—or you go to gulag.

The second insight deals with the whole “hate speech” canard. Freedom of speech does include a license to hate. I hate illegal immigration. Does that make it hate speech? I guess, in that general sense that liberals love to jump into to justify their own hate speech, including “Keep your hate speech off this campus!” or “Hang Trump!” The second hateful remark came from a German professor at Fresno State University two months ago. His classes were canceled, but not because of the content of the courses, mind you. His tweet was more than hate, but a vicious threat to kill the President. Besides, his inconsiderate rhetoric reflected poorly on the university—not that they don’t already look bad to the thinking, reasoning world.

Free speech does not justify shouting “Fire” in a crowded theater when there is no fire. But that scenario is not about speech. The prohibitions comes from the imminent danger based on the statement.

Ann Coulter added further depth to this insight. Despite her Berkeley no-show fail, I still respect her keen mind and strong consistency to root out bigger issues underlying debates which can turn mundane.

This Sunday on ABC’s This Week with George Step-on-All-Of-Us, Jonathan Karl rolled out the expected Berkeley-First Amendment wrestling match, this time with Ann Coulter and Robert Reich discussing free speech and its many discontents. Strangely enough, Coulter’s most supporters included Barack Obama, Bernie Sanders, and Robert Reich (even though Reich blocked me on Twitter two months ago!). With Karl moderating, Coulter dismissed the surface-level hustle over freedom of speech. It’s a given from professors left and right that diverse intellects should exercise their right to express their views.



Coulter plumbed the deeper vein of the problem when she slammed the “hate speech” brand seared onto her proposed speech about illegal immigration. Discussion of public policy is not hate speech in the slightest, she indicated, but the necessary engine for good governance in our republic.
And there’s one more thing about this free speech/hate speech brouhaha: this term “hate speech” has grown so broad as to be meaningless. Ha Ha Ha!

“Illegal aliens commit crimes.” Racist!

“Women and men exhibit fundamental biological differences.” Backward chauvinist pig!

“Homosexuality is not an innate trait.” Homophobic bigot!

Yet scientific research underscores these talking points.

How about this triggering truth: “There is no such thing as hate speech.”



Why? Tagging any statement as “hateful” is subjective, lacking clear standards. Wikipedia (not Wikileaks, which was hate speech to corrupt Democrats) defines It’s not hate speech as much as hateful hearing hate speech as “speech which attacks a person or group on the basis of attributes such as gender, ethnic origin” etc. The offense lies with the hearer, not the speaker. From George Carlin’s monologues or Don Rickles’ ribbings, everyone bursts out laughing at the sharp, explicitly anti-PC retorts. Only the smug, razor-blade Antifa snowflakes want to slash their lungs out because they have predetermined such jibes as hateful.

Now let’s go one step further. In the end, it’s a power struggle, fomented in the minds of the hateful hearers. Leftist organizations smear un-leftist rhetoric as “hate speech” in order to shut down the opposition and remove all challenges. Analyzing the high illegitimacy rates in black communities or criticizing Islam becomes “hate speech”, even though the welfare and safety of our country depend on having these discussions. The “hate speech” controversy definitely explains why Middlebury College snowflakes shut down Charles Murray earlier this month.



Once a brilliant tactic, this Alinskyite shaming and threatening is now failing. The police are protecting conservatives so that violence won’t silence. The problem is now exposed as hateful hearing, not hate speech. So I say: “Suck it up buttercups, free speech is here to stay, whether you hate it or not, and we Americans will safely speak our minds.”