Groomer Al Muratsuchi Still Refuses to Grant Hearing for Parental Notification Bill AB 1314

 

Predatory Mark Berndt and Groomer Al Muratsuchi

California State Asm. Al Muratsuchi is one of the biggest cheerleaders for the drop-out factories we used to call "public schools."

When he first got elected in 2012, he was a guaranteed foot-soldier for the teachers unions, who bought his campaign, bought his seat, and bought him body and soul.

One of the first bills he introduced into the legislature?

AB 375, a bill that would have made it HARDER to fire pervert teachers. The bill was so bad, that even Governor Brown had to veto it. 

Here's the full ad on Al's support for that terrible piece of legislation:

Al's bill would have allowed predators like Mark Berndt, the notorious serious child abuser from Miramonte Elementary School in LAUSD, to get away with his crimes, some suggesting that he had molested as many as 100 students!

Groomer Al Muratsuchbi also supported AB 1266 in 2013, which allowed males to use female restrooms in public schools across the state. Notice how a similar bill has NOT passed to force every private and public facility to allow men to use women's restrooms throughout the state, too. The kids are always targeted, and the groomers get to groom on campuses across the state.

And Groomer Al doesn't care. He has no problem pushing social engineering and outright abuse onto California's children.

Fast forward to 2020, and Groomer Al voted for SB 145, a bill that made it easier for sex offenders to avoid the sex offender registration. Yes. If a 24-year-old had sex with a 14-year-old, he (or she) could avoid the sex offender registry based on the discretion of the judge. That's what the bill did, and Groomer Al went all in on allowing sex offenders to abuse kids and above the sex offender registry.

How sickening does it get in Sacramento? Does anyone have any shame left in that town? Worse yet, Muratsuchi was the tie-breaking vote. It would have died on the floor of the State Assembly if he had voted for "No."

SB 145 was so bad, that outspoken progressive Lorena Gonzalez spoke out against the bill, and she urged a "No" vote on the floor of the State Assembly. As a chair for one of the key committees in Sacramento, that was an unprecedented move, her going against the state legislative leadership. And yet, Groomer Al voted for it.

In 2023 and even today, Groomer Al Muratsuch is blocking AB 1314 from getting a hearing in the CA State Assembly. This commonsense bill would require school districts to inform parents if their students are going by different names, pronouns, or claiming to be a different sex at the school.

Here's the full report from California Family Council:

California Assembly Education Committee Chair Al Muratsuchi is still blocking public debate at the state capitol over parent notification in schools despite polls showing the voters overwhelmingly support it. Last year, Assemblyman Bill Essayli introduced AB 1314, a bill requiring public schools to notify parents if a child starts identifying at school as a gender that does not align with the sex listed on his or her birth certificate. 

The legislation was assigned to the Assembly Committee on Education, but Muratsuchi refused to set the bill for a hearing. This week there is an opportunity for him to change his mind before Friday’s deadline. But Muratsuchi is still refusing.

“Nothing good comes out of keeping secrets from parents,” Essayli told a crowd gathered outside the state capitol last week. “Nobody loves their children more than their parents. If children are struggling with their identity; if they are struggling with anything at school, they need their parents. To isolate them from their parents is to do them harm.”

“Unfortunately, this legislature is so arrogant, they are so pompous, they refuse to even give my bill a hearing,” he complained. “They don’t even want to take a vote. That’s how little regard they have for the people of this state.”

Muratsuchi explained the justification for his decision in a press release last April. “As Chair of the Education Committee, I will not be setting AB 1314 for a hearing, not only because the bill is proposing bad policy, but also because a hearing would potentially provide a forum for increasingly hateful rhetoric targeting LGBTQ youth.” 

Assemblyman Al Muratsuchi

Greg Burt, vice president of the California Family Council, says this decision reveals the contempt some lawmakers have for the Constitutional rights of parents to guide and oversee the upbringing of their children. “Why is a discussion about keeping parents informed about the struggles of their children seen as threat towards LGBTQ-identified youth?” Burt asks. “Parents, keen to protect their children, always want to be informed about their kids’ lives. This is true for parents no matter what their political or religious affiliation.”  

A recent California poll confirms this contention. A SPRY Strategies poll from last November shows liberal and conservative voters agree on parent notification. The poll asks the following question: 

“A school board voted to notify parents if their child identifies as transgender or the opposite sex. The Attorney General is suing that school district. Do you agree parents should be notified if their child identifies as transgender in school?”

58.1 percent of the respondents said they “strongly agree” with this statement. An additional 14 percent said they “somewhat agree.” Another Rasmussen poll from last May yielded similar results.  

After Essayli’s bill was refused a hearing last year, he joined with a group of parental rights organizations (Coalition for Parental Rights) to promote parent notification policies in local school districts. (read more here) So far 10 California School Districts have implemented a notification policy of their own, even though California Attorney General Rob Bonta filed a lawsuit against one of the school districts over the policy. (read more here) 

What is it with Creepy Groomer Al Muratsuchi, anyway? Why is he so determined to allow perverted adults in the classroom to get away with all kinds of predatory behavior against children?!

This is really disturbing!

At the May, 2023 town hall that he hosted in the Torrance City Council chambers, he received loud boos from the audience for blocking this bill in the State Assembly Education committee, which he currenlty chairs. I was stunned at the level of outrage directed towards him, considering that most of the voters are pretty moderate-to-liberal on most cultural issues. However,for protecting the systemic grooming of children in California classrooms. Strangely enough, he does not have the full video of that town hall on his YouTube channel ...

What will it take for voters to pay attention in the South Bay and start electing better people who actually care about the health and welfare of children? Why do so many voters from El Segundo to Palos Verdes turn a blind eye to this creepy groomer assemblyman, who is determined to give predator teachers and their enablers more protections than children and parents?

Tell Asm. Muratsuchi to vigin AB 1314 a hearing and vote YES!

Contact

Capitol Office
Capitol Swing Space
1021 O Street, Suite 5610
Sacramento, CA 94249-0066
(916) 319-2066

District Office:
3424 W. Carson St.
Suite 450
Torrance, CA 90503
(310) 375-0691

School's Out for the Summer! (School's Out Forever? I Wish!)

"School's out for the summer! School's out forever!" -- Alice Cooper

"Well we got no choice

All the girls and boys" ....

Governor Gavin Newsom issued some somber--perhaps to some people--that California schools would probably remained closed for the remainder of the school year, not open up until after summer vacation.

ABC 30 reports:

Coronavirus: Newsom warns most schools could be closed until summer aslockdown expands

“Don’t anticipate schools are going to open up in a week,” governor says

CONCORD, CA – MARCH 17

Most of California’s schools could remain shuttered for the rest of the school year as the coronavirus pandemic continues to spread across the state, Gov. Gavin Newsom warned Tuesday.

More than 98 percent of California’s student body — about 6.1 million students — have had their classes cancelled so far, Newsom said. While many school districts have only announced closures for a few weeks, Newsom said it was unlikely that most would open again before their summer breaks in May or June.

Man, I wish I had been this lucky when I was growing up! Seriously!

“Don’t anticipate schools are going to open up in a week,” he said in a press conference at the state’s emergency headquarters. “It’s unlikely that many of these schools — few if any — will open before the summer break.”

“Boy, I hope I’m wrong, but I believe that to be the case,” based on experts’ assessments of the level of social distancing required to beat back the growing epidemic, Newsom added.

I hope he's not wrong, for once.

Our kids would be in much better hands staying at home with a parent or another loved one, as opposed to sitting in any of the toxic government schools indoctrinating children to hate this country, hate our nation's values, and even to hate themselves.

Due to the shutdowns, California has requested a federal waiver that would allow the state government to not require standardized testing this year. Students “already have enough anxiety” as it is, Newsom said.

More winning! These standardized tests are not preparing students for the real world as enterpreneurs and active citizens who can make the difference in their lives, and in the lives of their families and communities. In fact, much of the illiberal indoctrination which has become so rampant in California's government schools is only programming students to become Democratic talking-point hactivists who expect the government to answer all of their problems.

I am glad that school's going to be out for the summer! Frankly, I think that government schooling should be out forever, just like Alice Cooper said!

In fact, I kind of look forward to what he ranted about forty years ago!

No more pencils no more books

No more teacher's dirty looks yeah

Well we got no class

And we got no principals

And we got no innocence

I would say that Alice Cooper is wrong in only one sense. 

Because kids are not going back to school this year, they will actually be able to retain their innonence for a few more years.

They won't be learning about homosexuality, transgenderism, easy sex, abortions, the accumulation of STDs.

They won't be compelled to share bathrooms with students of the opposite sex.

They won't be imbibing all the illiberal, anti-American hate which teaches them to be cynical about anything and all things good and proper in the world.

They won't have to fear predatory school staff, administrators, or teachers, either. Whether the press wants to talk about it or not, there is an unprecedented degree of sexual abuse rampant in government-run public schools.

And they kids won't have to submit to the corrupt, perverted teachers' unions poisoning them with their political propaganda, either.

WOW! School's Out for the Summer! Let's Party!

Pro-Family Group Sues San Diego Unified--CAIR Collusion Under Review

Thank God that there are more Californians fighting against the corrupting, anti-Christian, anti-Judeo Christian ethic on which this country was founded.

Islam is a cult, and a dangerous cult at that.

It's wrong for left-wing ideologues to push their agenda onto our students, and to prevent parents from standing up to this destructive agenda.

I am glad for the parents and the attorneys who are fighting back against CAIR and the arrogant San Diego School Board!

Citizens for Quality Education-San Diego "The philosophy of the school room in one generation will be the philosophy of government in the next." Abraham Lincoln

In the matter of FCDF v. San Diego Unified School District, SDUSD has been expedited by the Court to produce "ALL DOCUMENTS in the POSSESSION, CUSTODY OR CONTROL OF DEFENDANTS CONCERNING CAIR and its employees, agents, and representatives sent or from Defendants since July 25, 2017, which concern the “ANTI-ISLAMOPHOBIA INITIATIVE” and/or the “POLICY”, and including the "ISLAMOPHOBIA TOOLKIT". As you will recall, the July rescision of the policy by the SDUSD Board of Trustees was a sham and evidence shows the Superintendent continued her association with CAIR. The Court, in a 14-page opinion, found the plaintiffs "established a reasonable need for their expedited discovery" in their Preliminary Injunction. These records are to be submitted by April 9, 2018, which is the deadline for the district to file an opposition to the motion for a preliminary injunction. A hearing date on the motion (no oral argument) is scheduled for April 23, 2018. Mary Baker, CQE SD  FEDERAL JUDGE: SAN DIEGO UNIFIED MUST PRODUCE RECORDS OF ALLEGED COLLUSION WITH ISLAMIC ORGANIZATION Families Have “Reasonable Need” for Expedited Records in Light of Request to Shut Down School District’s Supposedly Rescinded “Anti-Islamophobia Initiative” For Immediate Release: Tuesday, March 6, 2018 Contact: Daniel J. Piedra, Exec. Dir., Freedom of Conscience Defense Fund 858-759-9948; dpiedra@fcdflegal.org SAN DIEGO, Calif. – Yesterday, a federal judge ruled that the San Diego Unified School District (SDUSD) must hand over critical evidence to five families as part of their legal challenge to the district’s “Anti-Islamophobia Initiative.” The program, which was enacted last April, singles out Muslim students for special protections and empowers a controversial Islamic advocacy organization, the Council on American-Islamic Relations (CAIR), to vet and revise school curriculum. The Freedom of Conscience Defense Fund (FCDF) is representing the five families in a federal civil rights lawsuit filed last May. Two local organizations, San Diego Asian Americans for Equality Foundation and Citizens for Quality Education San Diego, are also plaintiffs in the suit. On February 20, the plaintiffs filed a motion for a preliminary injunction with over 200 pages of supporting evidence, asking the Court to stop SDUSD’s superintendent and school board from further implementing the initiative. The school board claimed to have rescinded the program at a public board meeting in July 2017, but extensive evidence uncovered over the past several months shows that the alleged cancellation of the policy was a “sham.” To prepare for the tentative hearing on the preliminary injunction, the plaintiffs now seek communications and other records that took place after the July 2017 board meeting. Federal procedural court rules typically prohibit early “discovery” until the parties’ attorneys meet to set up a corresponding timeline. However, a court can grant a request for expedited discovery if there is a showing of “good cause.” In this case, the Court found that access to additional SDUSD records is “in the interest of the administration justice” to “more fully develop the factual record on the Plaintiffs’ preliminary injunction motion.” According to the Court’s 14-page opinion:  Whether or not Defendants’ rescission was a “sham,” facts pertaining to the District’s conduct after the public rescission of the Policy may be relevant to the question of whether Plaintiffs face ongoing irreparable harm from a policy that allegedly violates the First Amendment of the Federal Constitution. Plaintiffs’ assertion of irreparable harm in their preliminary injunction motion stems from the existence and implementation of an allegedly unconstitutional policy.  Charles LiMandri, FCDF’s president and chief counsel, said: The Court’s ruling affirms that there are significant First Amendment questions in this case. It is only fair that our clients have the necessary evidence to vindicate their constitutional rights. Therefore, we are pleased the Court recognizes the potential irreparable harm San Diego Unified has caused these families. As part of its ruling, the Court narrowed down several proposed records requests, finding that they were “overly broad.” This included narrowing names and documents to those referenced in the preliminary injunction motion and tailoring the requests to focus exclusively on the Anti-Islamophobia Initiative’s policies and subsequent iterations, not to the case at large. SDUSD must produce the records by April 9, 2018, which is the deadline for the district to file an opposition to the motion for a preliminary injunction. A hearing date on the motion is scheduled for April 23, 2018. # # #

Copyright © 2018 CQE San Diego, All rights reserved. You are receiving this email because you requested to be on our membership list. Our mailing address is: CQE San Diego 14316 High Valley Road Poway, CA 92064