Showing posts with label Groomers. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Groomers. Show all posts

Monday, January 8, 2024

Groomer Al Muratsuchi Still Refuses to Grant Hearing for Parental Notification Bill AB 1314

 

Predatory Mark Berndt and Groomer Al Muratsuchi


California State Asm. Al Muratsuchi is one of the biggest cheerleaders for the drop-out factories we used to call "public schools."

When he first got elected in 2012, he was a guaranteed foot-soldier for the teachers unions, who bought his campaign, bought his seat, and bought him body and soul.

One of the first bills he introduced into the legislature?

AB 375, a bill that would have made it HARDER to fire pervert teachers. The bill was so bad, that even Governor Brown had to veto it. 

Here's the full ad on Al's support for that terrible piece of legislation:


Al's bill would have allowed predators like Mark Berndt, the notorious serious child abuser from Miramonte Elementary School in LAUSD, to get away with his crimes, some suggesting that he had molested as many as 100 students!

Groomer Al Muratsuchbi also supported AB 1266 in 2013, which allowed males to use female restrooms in public schools across the state. Notice how a similar bill has NOT passed to force every private and public facility to allow men to use women's restrooms throughout the state, too. The kids are always targeted, and the groomers get to groom on campuses across the state.

And Groomer Al doesn't care. He has no problem pushing social engineering and outright abuse onto California's children.

Fast forward to 2020, and Groomer Al voted for SB 145, a bill that made it easier for sex offenders to avoid the sex offender registration. Yes. If a 24-year-old had sex with a 14-year-old, he (or she) could avoid the sex offender registry based on the discretion of the judge. That's what the bill did, and Groomer Al went all in on allowing sex offenders to abuse kids and above the sex offender registry.

How sickening does it get in Sacramento? Does anyone have any shame left in that town? Worse yet, Muratsuchi was the tie-breaking vote. It would have died on the floor of the State Assembly if he had voted for "No."

SB 145 was so bad, that outspoken progressive Lorena Gonzalez spoke out against the bill, and she urged a "No" vote on the floor of the State Assembly. As a chair for one of the key committees in Sacramento, that was an unprecedented move, her going against the state legislative leadership. And yet, Groomer Al voted for it.

In 2023 and even today, Groomer Al Muratsuch is blocking AB 1314 from getting a hearing in the CA State Assembly. This commonsense bill would require school districts to inform parents if their students are going by different names, pronouns, or claiming to be a different sex at the school.

Here's the full report from California Family Council:

California Assembly Education Committee Chair Al Muratsuchi is still blocking public debate at the state capitol over parent notification in schools despite polls showing the voters overwhelmingly support it. Last year, Assemblyman Bill Essayli introduced AB 1314, a bill requiring public schools to notify parents if a child starts identifying at school as a gender that does not align with the sex listed on his or her birth certificate. 

The legislation was assigned to the Assembly Committee on Education, but Muratsuchi refused to set the bill for a hearing. This week there is an opportunity for him to change his mind before Friday’s deadline. But Muratsuchi is still refusing.

“Nothing good comes out of keeping secrets from parents,” Essayli told a crowd gathered outside the state capitol last week. “Nobody loves their children more than their parents. If children are struggling with their identity; if they are struggling with anything at school, they need their parents. To isolate them from their parents is to do them harm.”

“Unfortunately, this legislature is so arrogant, they are so pompous, they refuse to even give my bill a hearing,” he complained. “They don’t even want to take a vote. That’s how little regard they have for the people of this state.”

Muratsuchi explained the justification for his decision in a press release last April. “As Chair of the Education Committee, I will not be setting AB 1314 for a hearing, not only because the bill is proposing bad policy, but also because a hearing would potentially provide a forum for increasingly hateful rhetoric targeting LGBTQ youth.” 

Assemblyman Al Muratsuchi

Greg Burt, vice president of the California Family Council, says this decision reveals the contempt some lawmakers have for the Constitutional rights of parents to guide and oversee the upbringing of their children. “Why is a discussion about keeping parents informed about the struggles of their children seen as threat towards LGBTQ-identified youth?” Burt asks. “Parents, keen to protect their children, always want to be informed about their kids’ lives. This is true for parents no matter what their political or religious affiliation.”  

A recent California poll confirms this contention. A SPRY Strategies poll from last November shows liberal and conservative voters agree on parent notification. The poll asks the following question: 

A school board voted to notify parents if their child identifies as transgender or the opposite sex. The Attorney General is suing that school district. Do you agree parents should be notified if their child identifies as transgender in school?”

58.1 percent of the respondents said they “strongly agree” with this statement. An additional 14 percent said they “somewhat agree.” Another Rasmussen poll from last May yielded similar results.  

After Essayli’s bill was refused a hearing last year, he joined with a group of parental rights organizations (Coalition for Parental Rights) to promote parent notification policies in local school districts. (read more here) So far 10 California School Districts have implemented a notification policy of their own, even though California Attorney General Rob Bonta filed a lawsuit against one of the school districts over the policy. (read more here

What is it with Creepy Groomer Al Muratsuchi, anyway? Why is he so determined to allow perverted adults in the classroom to get away with all kinds of predatory behavior against children?!

This is really disturbing!

At the May, 2023 town hall that he hosted in the Torrance City Council chambers, he received loud boos from the audience for blocking this bill in the State Assembly Education committee, which he currenlty chairs. I was stunned at the level of outrage directed towards him, considering that most of the voters are pretty moderate-to-liberal on most cultural issues. However,for protecting the systemic grooming of children in California classrooms. Strangely enough, he does not have the full video of that town hall on his YouTube channel ...

What will it take for voters to pay attention in the South Bay and start electing better people who actually care about the health and welfare of children? Why do so many voters from El Segundo to Palos Verdes turn a blind eye to this creepy groomer assemblyman, who is determined to give predator teachers and their enablers more protections than children and parents?

Tell Asm. Muratsuchi to vigin AB 1314 a hearing and vote YES!

Contact

Capitol Office
Capitol Swing Space
1021 O Street, Suite 5610
Sacramento, CA 94249-0066
(916) 319-2066

District Office:
3424 W. Carson St.
Suite 450
Torrance, CA 90503
(310) 375-0691

Tuesday, November 22, 2022

MoveOn.org Goes Full Groomer, Defends Pornography for Kids Under Guise of "Stopping Book Bans"

Dear MoveOn member,

When we introduced these "Warning: May Contain Banned Books" tote bags earlier this year, we ran out in hours. We're excited to announce that we have brought them back in stock just in time for the holidays!

Click here to get yours now, or give one as a gift to your family and friends!

Arthur, we created these tote bags as a form of protest against the ongoing efforts by Republicans to control the minds of our children, silence voices of dissent, and stop school teachers from providing accurate, fact-based information about American history to their students.

We first offered these tote bags in March, when data was released showing that book bans reached an all-time high across the country in 2021.1

New reporting now shows that 2022 has exceeded 2021 in book bans, with thousands of books being banned in cities, towns, and schools across America.2

Which books are Republicans focused on banning?

40% of banned books featured main characters that are LGBTQ+.3

40% had main characters that were people of color.4

And 20% directly addressed race and racism.5

Republicans are using these bans to push a hateful, homophobic, white supremacist agenda, but they will not succeed.

MoveOn and our allies will continue to fight at every turn to stop these book bans and defeat the politicians who are pushing them forward—and you can join in by getting your very own "Warning: May Contain Banned Books" tote bag and using it proudly at the library, grocery store, and anywhere else where you can spread the message.

The best part is: By getting this tote bag from MoveOn, every dollar you spend will go directly toward the work to defeat the GOP. Not a single cent will go toward lining the pockets of billionaires.

Click here to get yours now, while supplies last!

Thanks for all you do.

–Kelly, Elizabeth, Bekir, Rahna, and the rest of the team

Sources:

1. "As Book Bans Escalate, Here’s What You Need to Know," Education Week, September 30, 2022
https://act.moveon.org/go/169725?t=5&akid=338864%2E54027705%2Ey-Vly0

2. Ibid.

3. Ibid.

4. Ibid.

5. Ibid.

Want to support MoveOn's work? Voters just defied history and stopped a MAGA wave of extremism at the polls. But there is more work to do to end the filibuster, codify abortion rights into law, and defend our freedoms, our families, and our futures. We can accomplish all this and more, but only if we work together. 
 
Will you chip in right now to power our critical work? 

Click here to chip in $3, or whatever you can afford.

Thursday, November 17, 2022

GAG on Gays Against Groomers: Arielle Scarcella

So, who are the members of "Gays Against Groomers"?

I already talked about Buck Angel.

Now, let's take a look Arielle Scarcella:




Check out this statement from another "Gay Against Groomers":

And there's more.

She loves stripping in front of the camera:

She has an OnlyFans (porn) account, and she wants to tell the world:



She is proud of her OnlyFans page, and she defends pornography, too:


She also wants to teach women all kinds of raunchy sexual acts with other women:


Her she exposes another nude photo of herself:




And with all of this, she claims to be a conservative. Really:

And check out how "conservative" she claims to be with out-homosexual Rob Smith (who voted for Bernie Sanders in 2016, by the way, and who opposed President Trump banning transgenderism from the American military):

Here's some highlights:

"I get so much hate for being a grifter."

Yes, they are grifters. It's all about them, and it's all about promoting their perversions as a "community" to score virtue-signaling points.

"You are not supposed to be a part of the [LGBT] culture."

Rob Smith then celebrates RuPaul's "Drag Race." Really. This is conservatism?

Rob also admits: "I like going to PRIDE."

Pride parades are filled with sexually explicit images and themes, non-stop grooming that targets children and adults alike. This is conservative? These two consider themselves champions for children?

Rob then goes off about men competing against women in women's sports, but he had no problem denouncing President Trump when he banned confused men and women pretending to be the opposite sex from serving in the military.

But we need to focus on Scarcella for now. And she wants to be the face of "Gays Against Groomers."

No, what we have is more groomers grooming the adults and still coming after the kids.

 Say NO to Gays Against Groomers. They are still groomers, just grooming at the speed limit, nothing more.

Thursday, August 25, 2022

"Gays Against Groomers" Protects the Grooming, Loves the Grifting

"What a win for our community!"
Yeah, and what about the kids, though?


This Gays Against Groomers movement is all wrong. It's one thing to want to protect children, but it's quite another to make promoting and normalizing your false identity a key part of the movement to protect children.

I wrote about this group before, and how they get a great deal of attention from the so-called conservative media.

Even Tucker Carlson gushed all over Gays Against Groomers a few weeks ago, featuring one of their key spokesmen, who stated that they care about children and want to stop the targeting LGBT abuse of children.

To be fair, they make those declarations on their website:


Any common-sense adult (and child, of course) would oppose these horrific practices.

But the prevalence of these vile behaviors does beg a question: why do we see such a tidal wave of perversion like this in the first place? Why are we subjected to this constant effort to normalize homosexuality, transgenderism, and other paraphilias onto children in the first place?

It all goes back to the normalization of these behaviors among adults. For the last thirty to forty years, homosexual activists, their transgender partners in perversion, and the corporate, globalist, and progressive interests backing them have been pressing for this agenda to capture the minds and hearts of all.

If homosexuality and transgenderism are normal, then why is anyone surprised to see these vile behaviors forcing their way into other public places, like libraries, schools, and businesses?

The goal has always been targeting the children, that is an established fact. But if the behaviors are not in and of themselves wrong, what authority does anyone have to prevent them being pushed on children? This moral and logical turn is lost on so many people. I cannot tell you how many parents I have worked with, or at least tried to work with, who insisted that they were not "anti-gay." They just don't want it pushed on "the children."

Hiding behind the shield of "for the children" needs to be confronted too.

Groups like "Gays Against Groomers" are using children to make themselves look good. They want to maintain the lie that their behaviors are normal, but that it should not spill out onto the children. "Let us do whatever we want to, but let's not push this onto the kids!"

Why are they raising the alarm now? Where were they five or even ten years ago? Some may argue that the prevalence of drag queens reading to children, or explicit sex-ed curricula pushed onto children in classrooms is only happening now. That is not true, however. This rabid LGBT agenda has been targeting children, the schools, and the universities for quite some time.

They are getting involved now because the backlash is growing against the entire LGBT movement, against the whole corrupt, abusive agenda. This whole "Gays Against Groomers" movement is a massive CYA operation. They claim to be going to great lengths to protect children in order to cover up the sordid reality that homosexuality and transgenderism is all but inseparable from child abuse.

Having Gays Against Groomers is illogical and antithetical to reality, like having an inebriated alcoholic smiling for the camera while at the same time telling the audience "Don't drink and drive."

It's like a cancer patient warning people "Don't Smoke," all while smoking at the same time.

It's like heroin addicts telling people to kick the habit, all while shooting up and loving every minute of it.

For proof of this deep confusion, look no further than Lada MAGA, who also goes by the pseudonym "Ryanna Woods":

There is so much to unpack here.

First of all, he has to put on his lip gloss. Really? Why the focus on making himself "look good"? Right away, we can see the video is all about himself, and not the children.

Then he announces the fact that he "is" gay, as though it's as normal as the sun following the moon from day to day. "I went a two-year Mormon trip to France. I thought God would take away my homosexuality. Nope! I'm gay!"

So, there's not just confusion, but a subtle chop at religion, too.

For what it's worth, what I have learned from real reparative therapists and therapeutic choice advocates is that dealing with the underlying emotional and mental health issues which scar an individual and cause them to form unhealthy attachment issues with the same sex. These issues do not get solved via "pray the gay away." The Bible does not teach such sudden changes in anyone, either. People do get saved, they received Jesus as their Savior, and from there they grow in grace and knowledge of the Lord (2 Peter 3:18), and they are transformed from glory to glory (2 Corinthians 3:18)

For people in other faith traditions, they face a longer journey of dealing with the painful undercurrents which harmed them, too. These issues do not get resolved overnight, nor should there be a massive rush to set oneself free, either. Dealing with the aftershocks of abuse, neglect, confusion, and molestation cannot be overcome in just one day, or even in one year, necessarily.

For Ryanna, there is no compunction to investigate why he had the unnatural feelings for the same sex. There is no interest into looking at his childhood or even his adult. Was there any trauma in his life? How did his parents respond when he shared with them his unnatural feelings for the same sex?

Instead of confronting the real problems in his own life, he decides to fight for his "right" to be gay, and then cover for the growing problems with these behaviors by fighting "for the children." He even goes so far as to say that he was not interested in a woman's "breast-icles"(?).

What kind of craziness is all of this? Ryanna is not a serious man. He has not grown up, and he is not dealing with the underlying harms that have caused him such confusion. How is someone with so many issues in a position to help children? He isn't willing to help himself.

Lady MAGA is representative of the larger group of homosexuals (and transgenders) who want to normalize their perversion all while appearing virtuous.

And making a buck or two:


What's wrong with saving the kids as long as you can make some money, right?  There's actually a great deal wrong with this. What exactly are they doing to save kids? Showing up on a nightly talk show or news program does not save lives. This whole mess is about self-promotion, not child protection. The very name gives it away: "Gays Against Groomers." They are talking about themselves first and foremost. If they really cared about the children, they would have settled for "Stop the Grooming" or "Stop LGBT Grooming." Of course, if they went along with that title, they would have to admit that the whole LGBT movement is saturated with grooming, and that is metastisizes because of grooming.

This "Gays Against Groomers" racket is such an immoral exercise in grift, graft, and the normalization of their own perversion. The whole thing just makes me sick, especially because it really is not about the kids. It's about themselves, about promoting themselves and making themselves feel good.

That's the worse part of it, by the way. No doubt, the vast majority of the LGBT activists involved in this Gays Against Groomers craze were groomed and abused themselves. The fact that they want to flaunt their gayness, throw a party celebrating themselves, "their community" as mentioned in the text above

With that, they are getting more air time on Fox News:

Sunday, July 24, 2022

Gays Against Groomers: Too Little, Too Late, Not Good Enough

The homosexual and transvestite lobby has been pushing lies upon lies on the general public for decades:

1. "We were born this way."

2. "We are just consenting adults who want to love one another."

3. "What we want is just to be respected and left alone."

4. "We promise that we won't go after your freedom of speech or religion."

5. "There is nothing wrong with homosexuality or transgenderism."

6. "Yes, people can change their sex."

All of these promises and statements have turned out to be big fat lies. They were lies in the beginning, and yet for the last thirty years, the public has been jammed and programmed to believe the lies.

But now there is a new group out there, a bunch of homosexuals, who are dedicated to stopping the grooming of children at all costs ... supposedly.

The group is called "Gays Against Groomers", and they are supposedly taking on the LGBT activists around the world that are targeting children with homosexuality and transgenderism:

The admission from one lesbian activist is somewhat telling:

This lesbian shares the following admission (of sorts):

"So here it is, the most unpopular opinion I will ever do. If I would have understood  when I was younger that fighting for my rights as a lesbian would mean allowing children to drag shows, attaching child molesters to our community, and allowing children to change their sex ebfore they know what their favorite color, I would have never done it."

My first response? Too little remorse, too late.

The LGBT movement at its core was interested in normalizing indoctrination, grooming, and pedophilia. Don't believe me? Check out this quick crash course in Queer Theory history:

What's more, a liberal author/reporter/propagandist acknowledged in his latest book detailing the rise of the Right in 1970s America that the advancement of "gay rights" went hand-in-hand with repealing age of consent laws:

In 1972, the Democrats' gay caucus won the right to hold a convention floor vote on a gay rights plank in the party platform. (The plank failed in part because at an earlier meeting the caucus had voted 32-24 in to endorse abolition of "all laws governing the age of sexual consent.") (Reaganland, pg 84, 2020)

Pastor Scott Lively has also written extensively about how the push to normalize homosexuality went hand-in-hand with the drive to normalize sexual predation and exploitation of children.

I must also remind everyone of the fantastic undercover work that Ryan Sorba did for Project Veritas, exposing the truth beliefs of homosexuals, including a large cohort at a San Diego gay bar:

Born Gay Hoax from highblur on Vimeo.

Child abuse has been central to the entrenchment and proliferation of homosexuality and transgenderism. It originates from abuse, and tto normalize these terrible behaviors is to normalize sexual abuse.

Out lesbians and active homosexuals who spent so much of their time normalizing their destructive lifestyles and pushing for acceptance now should have realized that they needed to deal with the earlier trauma in their lives which caused their unhealthy desires and distorted self-perception.

Because the body politick and the collective culture refused to take a stand for truth and against the normalization of these destructive behaviors, it is inevitable that the people suffering from these painful traumas, who in turn sought solace and acceptance in demanding government support and subsidy, would in turn unleash onto the world terrible targeting of our nation's younger generations.

In many ways, I have no sympathy with the above woman's coming to her senses. A lot of homosexuals are trying to maintain the imposed, inauthentic normalcy of their conduct, and at the same time they are trying to prop up the lie that they were "born that way." But at the same time, they want to back away from their extreme activism of the 1990s and 2000s, hoping that they can restore their standing in the general public by "proving" that they do not want children to be harmed.

They need to come to grips with the fact that they were harmed themselves. If they really want to go after the groomers, they need to start confronting the groomers who groomed them to become homosexual and transgender.

They need to confront a much deeper, more painful reality: that the identities that they have constructed for themselves, which in turn they have foisted on others, is a lie, and that their true identities will be found in resting in the natural order and truth of their bodies and minds.

If they really want to stop the groomers, then the gays need to give up the gay, as well. The truth is, the reason they are gay is that they were groomed, harmed, abused, neglected, molested, or enabled into these destructive behaviors and false ideas. In a sense, yes, they are victims and there needs to be that one degree of compassion. At the same time, the fact that hurt people hurt people is not an excuse.

The "Gays Against Groomers" push is too little, too late, not good enough.

If they want to redeem their past activism and make good on all the bad that has taken place, they need to apologize for trying to normalize their own behaviors. They need to seek proper help to deal with the deeper issues that caused them harm, and then knock the hell out of the lies of the LGBT agenda as a whole!

"Gays Against Groomers" should become "Ex-Gays Against Groomers" if they want to be serious about stopping this culture contagion for good.