Separation of Illegal Alien Families: What Jeff Sessions Quoted from the Bible

The lamestream media no longer hides their anti-American machinations. They routinely slander the President and his executive team, specifically for enforcing the United States’ immigration laws, something which the previous president refused to do.

The coverage in the printed press and on TV showcases the plights of the poor illegal alien families, refugees who are fleeing their home countries seeking a better life.

Now they have gone full SJW, slamming Trump and his leadership for separating illegal alien children from their parents.

Rebuffing this insensate criticism from the media, Sessions quoted the Bible:

"Persons who violate the law of our nation are subject to prosecution ... I would cite you to the Apostle Paul and his clear and wise command in Romans 13 to obey the laws of the government because God has ordained the government for his purposes. Orderly and lawful processes are good in themselves ... and protect the weak and it protects the lawful."

Specifically, Sessions is quoting Romans 13:1: “Let every soul be subject unto the higher powers. For there is no power but of God: the powers that be are ordained of God.”

Notice that Sessions referenced “orderly and lawful processes” and to “protect the weak and the lawful.” Why would anyone criticize these goals? If United States citizens go to jail for committing crimes, the children don’t join them. Why should it be any different with illegals and their children?

Of course, the anti-Christian bias spilled over in subsequent reports about Sessions’ Bible reference. The snide inferences in a Washington Post commentary took the same tired, extreme, racist argument:

Sessions says the Bible justifies separating immigrant families. The verses he cited are infamous.

Can you feel the clickbait already? What infamy does the commentator refer to?

When British subjects in the original 13 colonies started rolling up their sleeves for the fight for independence in the 1770s, loyalist preachers hammered on a particular Bible verse from their pulpits.

When Southern preachers blasted Northern abolitionists for defying the Fugitive Slave Act in the decade leading to the Civil War, they cited the same lines.

Such flagrantly misleading headlines shouldn’t be in print. In the two contexts referenced above, the political interests favoring the British Empire and the “peculiar institution” misused that verse to demand allegiance to unjust, ungodly government policies.

Let’s take on the misuse of God’s Word first, then let’s focus on Sessions’ proper application of Romans 13:1.

For starters, God intends for every person to live freely within Him. Jesus came to set us all free from the bondage of sin, for example:

“The Spirit of the Lord GOD is upon me; because the LORD hath anointed me to preach good tidings unto the meek; he hath sent me to bind up the brokenhearted, to proclaim liberty to the captives, and the opening of the prison to them that are bound.” (Isaiah 61:1)

During His earthly ministry, Jesus—The Way, the Truth, and the Life—told the Israelites:

“And ye shall know the truth, and the truth shall make you free.” (John 8:32)

Paul the Apostle defines the Holy Spirit in line with freedom, too:

“Now the Lord is that Spirit: and where the Spirit of the Lord is, there is liberty.” (2 Corinthians 3:17)

God did not intend for rulers to tyrannize their people, for all power does indeed come from God, as Paul wrote in Romans 13:1. In fact, Jesus’ heart is that we would have His abundant life (John 10:10), and the Apostle John voiced God’s desire that we prosper inside and outside (3 John 2). Tyranny and repression are incompatible with God’s will.

During the American Revolution, the British government had no right to deny the rights of Englishmen in one part of the world while recognizing the rights of Englishmen in the home country. The American colonists asserted their Biblical authority to form their own government. Our rights come from God, as affirmed in the Declaration of Independence: “We hold these truths to be self-evident, that all men are created equal, that they are endowed by their Creator with certain unalienable Rights.”  Those words are revolutionary now as they were when Thomas Jefferson penned them in 1776.

 As for slaveholders in the Ante-Bellum United States, no passage justifies enslaving another man because of his skin color. Paul the Apostle recognized that master-slave relationships in Rome, but he told masters to respect their slaves:

“And, ye masters, do the same things unto them, forbearing threatening: knowing that your Master also is in heaven; neither is there respect of persons with him.” (Ephesians 6:9)

He even exhorted a slave master (Philemon) to treat a slave (Onesimus) as a brother in Christ. Paul had met Onesimus in prison, shared the Gospel with him, and the slave believed in Jesus Christ.

Paul then sent the slave back to Philemon with these instructions:

“For perhaps he therefore departed for a season, that thou shouldest receive him for ever; Not now as a servant, but above a servant, a brother beloved, specially to me, but how much more unto thee, both in the flesh, and in the Lord?” (Philemon 15,16)

Now let us consider Sessions’ use of Romans 13:1. In a constitutional republic, leaders receive their power from “We the People.” They draft laws and outline legal processes for all matters, including detainment of illegal aliens. If the people do not like these actions, they can petition for a redress of grievances or change their leaders. Furthermore, these laws are being applied equitably. Trump’s executive team have provided food and housing for the illegal minors.  If the families don’t want to be separated, they should not break the law.

Sessions did not undermine the spirit or letter of God’s Word. The press is just hyperventilating (again) in another desperate bid to smear and undermine the President and his righteous enforcement of our nation’s immigration laws. If the press wants to uphold Biblical principles, they should stop lying, distorting people’s comments and misleading the public.

Letter to the Editor: The President Has Waited Too Long

Hello, my name is Jeff Beck (although not “the” Jeff Beck) and I live in San Dimas, CA. I just read your article demanding that President Donald Trump and AG Sessions do their jobs where it comes to illegal immigration, especially in California. I was wondering if there is a petition or some other specific way in which I can add my voice to this call? I’m wondering if these men don’t realize that this is THE issue that put them where they currently are? 

Doesn’t the President realize that he’s already waited too long and we are starting to get really, really upset about it? These foreign and hostile invaders are overrunning our borders with the help of internal traitors and we are being slaughtered! I am not fully plugged in as it were, and ignorant as to the mechanisms available to me toward doing something. If you don’t have the time to respond, I fully understand and will simply continue looking on my own. Thank you for supplying your contact information on Townhall.com, and also thank you for the thoughtful and infuriating (in a good way) articles. God bless.

Jeff Beck

AG Jeff Sessions to California Peace Officers Association, March 7, 2018, Sacramento

Here is the entire speech spoken by US Attorney General Jeff Sessions:

Thank you, Mark for that kind introduction, for your leadership with the CPOA, and most all for your 22 years of service in law enforcement.

I also want to thank all of the other law enforcement leaders who are here today:

• Sheriff Bill Brown of the California State Sheriffs’ Association
• Chief Ed Medrano of the California Police Chiefs Association
• Mark Brewster of the California Narcotic Officers Association
• District Attorney Todd Riebe of the California District Attorneys Association, and
• Commissioner Warren Stanley of the California Highway Patrol.

It is a special honor to be with the California Peace Officers' Association. 

With nearly a century of history, and more than 16,000 members, CPOA represents the core of California’s law enforcement community.

I know, first hand, the importance of the work that you do.  I know its dangers, challenges, frustrations, and satisfactions. I have had years of firsthand experience working with your colleagues. And while I have inexpressible pride in our fabulous federal law officers, I am fully aware that 85 percent of all law enforcement officers are state, local, and tribal.

And I am well aware that the increased training, professionalism, leadership, and more effective enforcement policies of our departments nationwide, and over several decades, has been the critical factor in reversing the dramatic rise in crime that we saw throughout the 1970s. 

Over a 22 year period, we saw homicide rates cut in half, youth drug use fall by almost half, and violent crime fall dramatically.  It was an achievement few would have ever expected.

Much of the transformative leadership for this change arose from your former Governor and our President Ronald Reagan—aided by his fabulous California counselor and later Attorney General, Ed Meese. 

Maybe in recent years we got complacent and took our eye off the ball, but recent trends are deeply worrisome. 

In 2014 and 2015 violent crime stopped falling and jumped seven percent nationwide. 

Homicide surged 20 percent, the largest increase since 1968.  And drug availability rose dramatically, lethal purity reached unprecedented levels while prices fell.  And along with the new killer drug, fentanyl, overdose deaths reached levels we have never seen before—66,000 deaths last year. 

That is why on my first day in office, President Trump sent me three executive orders:  (1) to back the women and men in blue, (2) to reduce crime in America, and (3) to dismantle transnational criminal gangs. 

We at the Department of Justice embrace these goals.  I know you do too.

Let me be explicit: our express goal is to reduce the violent crime rate, reduce the homicide rate, reduce the amount of opioids prescribed, and reduce overdose deaths.

Let’s resolve to achieve these goals. Ours is not just a job, but our sworn duty, and for many of us, a high calling.

And a lawful immigration system that serves the national interest helps us achieve these goals and more. That’s what we need to talk about today.

We are a strong, prosperous, and orderly nation.  And such a nation must have a lawful system of immigration.  I am not aware of any advanced nation that does not understand this fundamental tenet.

And let no one contend that we reject immigration and want to “wall off America” from all lawful immigration.  President Trump and the American people know what’s happening.  We admit 1.1 million immigrants lawfully to permanent legal status—green card status—every year, the highest numbers in the world. 

Indeed, at this unprecedented rate we will soon have the largest percentage of non-native born in our nation’s history with the percentage continuing to rise every year thereafter.

Thus, the good and decent people of this country are right to insist that this country should end the illegality, create a rational immigration flow, and protect the nation from criminal aliens.

It cannot be that someone who illegally crosses the border and two days later arrives in Sacramento, Dubuque, Louisville, and Central Islip is home free—never to be removed.

It cannot be the policy of a great nation to up and reward those who unlawfully enter its country with legal status, Social Security, welfare, food stamps, and work permits. Meanwhile those who engage in this process lawfully and patiently and wait their turn are discriminated against at every turn.

Most Americans get this.  They are working hard to make ends meet, follow the rules, and try to keep their loved ones safe. 

They, our citizens, want our government to think about them for a change to consider their interests.  They have dreams too.  Frankly, this commonsense concept was a key factor in President Trump’s election.  Elections have consequences. 

Immigration law is the province of the federal government.  This Administration and this Justice Department are determined to make it work effectively for the people.

I understand that we have a wide variety of political opinions out there on immigration.  But the law is in the books and its purpose is clear.

There is no nullification.  There is no secession.  Federal law is “the supreme law of the land.”  I would invite any doubters to Gettysburg, and to the graves of John C. Calhoun and Abraham Lincoln.

A refusal to apprehend and deport those, especially the criminal element, effectively rejects all immigration law and creates an open borders system.  Open borders is a radical, irrational idea that cannot be accepted. 

The United States of America is not “an idea;” it is a secular nation-state with a Constitution, laws, and borders, all of which are designed to protect our nation’s interests. Surely, we should be able to agree on this much. 

To carry out the intent of our laws, we need law officers.  We need our Immigration and Customs Officers and our Customs and Border Protection officers.  They are your brothers and sisters. President Trump, the Congress, and the American people want them to accomplish the goals our laws set out for them. That’s why we pay them.

But, California, we have a problem.  A series of actions and events has occurred that directly and adversely impact the work of our federal officers.

For example, the mayor of Oakland has been actively seeking to help illegal aliens avoid apprehension by ICE.  Her actions support those who flout our laws and boldly validate the illegality. There’s no other way to interpret her remarks. 

To make matters worse, the elected Lieutenant Governor of this state praised her for doing so.  Bragging about and encouraging the obstruction of our law enforcement and the law is an embarrassment to this proud and important state.

Tom Homan, Acting Director of ICE has said that “being a law enforcement officer is already dangerous enough, but to give the criminals a heads up that we're coming in the next 24 hours increases that risk.  I watch [the mayor’s] statement when she said her priority is the safety of her community, but what she did has the exact opposite effect.”

According to Acting Director Homan, ICE failed to make 800 arrests that they would have made if the mayor had not acted as she did. 

Those are 800 wanted aliens that are now at large in that community—most are wanted criminals that ICE will now have to pursue with more difficulty in more dangerous situations, all because of one mayor’s irresponsible action.

So here’s my message to Mayor Schaaf: How dare you.  How dare you needlessly endanger the lives of law enforcement just to promote your radical open borders agenda. 

But in California, we have an even bigger problem than just one mayor.  The problems continue.

For example, in January, Ventura County declined a request from ICE to hold an alien Ventura had arrested for continuous sexual abuse of a child. Instead of being removed from this country, he was released back into the community and now our federal law enforcement will need to find him and arrest him wherever he may be.

In recent years, California has enacted a number of laws designed to intentionally obstruct the work of our sworn immigration enforcement officers—to intentionally use every power it has to undermine duly-established immigration law in America.

California won’t let employers voluntarily allow ICE agents on their property.  And California requires employers to give notice to employees before ICE inspects their workplace. 

When this law was before the California General Assembly, a Judiciary Committee report explicitly stated that its goal was to frustrate “an expected increase in federal immigration enforcement actions.”

ICE agents are federal law enforcement officers carrying out federal law.  California cannot forbid them or obstruct them in doing their jobs.

Just imagine if a state passed a law forbidding employers from cooperating with OSHA in ensuring workplace safety.  Or the EPA, looking for a polluter.  That would obviously be absurd.  But it would be no different in principle from this new law enacted by California.

And just think about the situation it puts California employers in.  They want to help law enforcement.  They want to do their civic duty.  We ought to encourage that. 

But your state attorney general has repeatedly said his office will prosecute these business owners.  Let me quote: “ignorance of the law is no excuse if you violate it” and “you are subjecting yourself to up to $10,000 [in fines] for violations.”

California has also claimed the authority to inspect facilities where ICE holds people in custody.  Already this year, California has specifically and in a discriminatory manner targeted six facilities and demanded documents and other material from the Department of Homeland Security.

California won’t let law enforcement officers like you transfer prisoners into ICE custody or even communicate with ICE that you’re about to release someone they’re looking for.  Remember that California found these people dangerous enough to detain them in the first place, but then insists on releasing them back into the community instead of allowing federal officers to remove them. 

And rather than allow ICE officers to do their jobs at the jailhouse, they force these officers to conduct far more dangerous arrests elsewhere—where violent criminals may reside and where children can be caught in the crossfire.

That’s not just unconstitutional, it’s a plain violation of federal statute and common sense.

Importantly, these laws are harmful to Californians, and they’re especially harmful to law enforcement.

That’s why the Department of Justice has filed a lawsuit yesterday against the state of California to invalidate these unjust laws and to immediately freeze their effect.  Federal agents must be able to do the job that Congress has directed them to do.

Contrary to what you might hear from the lawless open borders radicals, we are not asking California, Oakland, or anyone else to enforce immigration laws. 

Although we would welcome the positive assistance the majority of jurisdictions in America provide, ICE agents do incredible work every day.  They will not be deterred.

We are simply asking California and other sanctuary jurisdictions to stop actively obstructing federal law enforcement. 

Stop treating immigration agents differently from everybody else for the purpose of eviscerating border controls and advancing an open borders philosophy shared by only the most radical extremists.  Stop protecting lawbreakers and giving all officers more dangerous work to do so that a few politicians can score political points on the backs of officer safety.

You are professionals.  You understand the risks involved. 

Think about the officers knocking on a door to execute a warrant.  They don’t know what’s on the other side.  It’s not fair to them to keep putting them in that situation by releasing criminal aliens into the community who shouldn’t even be in the country.  I sign condolence letters for law enforcement killed in the line of duty; I fundamentally reject, at my core, that we should further endanger the lives of those who risk everything for us just because some officials in California wants to violate the law in promotion of their radical agenda. 

California is using every power it has—and some it doesn’t—to frustrate federal law enforcement. So you can be sure I’m going to use every power I have to stop them.

We are going to fight these irrational, unfair, and unconstitutional policies that have been imposed on you and our federal officers.  We are fighting to make your jobs safer and to help you reduce crime in America.  We are fighting to have a lawful system of immigration that serves Americans. And we intend to win.

I want to close by reiterating my deep appreciation and profound thanks to all the women and men of law enforcement—federal, state, local, and tribal.  The work that you do—that you have dedicated your lives to—is essential.  I believe it.  The Department of Justice believes it.  And President Trump believes it.

You can be certain about this: we have your back and you have our thanks.

Travis Allen: Trump Administration Finally Sues State of California for Sanctuary State Lawlessness

We did it Friend! For weeks, we have been calling on President Trump and U.S. Attorney General Jeff Sessions to come to California and sue Jerry Brown, Xavier Becerra and the State for defying federal law by making California a sanctuary state. Thousands of you signed our petition -- and, thanks to your voices, the Trump Administration has finally decided to act! This is a major victory not just for the rule of law in a state that has acted in defiance of federal law on multiple occasions, but also for our efforts to Take Back California! You see what happens when conservatives and defenders of the Constitution here in California stand up against the liberal regime. Imagine what else we can achieve if we fight even harder . . . This victory is just a start -- will you help us keep our movement going with a contribution of $25, $50, $100 or more right now? CONTRIBUTE $25 NOW CONTRIBUTE $50 NOW CONTRIBUTE $100 NOW CONTRIBUTE $250 NOW CONTRIBUTE OTHER AMOUNT We still have a long way to go in this fight. We MUST elect a Republican Governor to ensure Democrats can no longer defy the Constitution. If conservatives can fight back against the Democrats' illegal actions and win, like we have here, then we can surely win this race. But, only if I can count on you to continue standing with me. Thank you for your support! - Travis Allen P.S. Thanks to you, President Trump and Jeff Sessions have responded and are holding the Democrats accountable. You have the power to make a change, Friend. Please continue to fight with me -- make a contribution to my campaign and help me Take Back California! Thanks - Travis

Lawless Dave Jones, Doubling Down on Sanctuary State Insanity

Instead of heeding the warnings of US Attorney General Jeff Sessions, statewide Democratic candidates are more interested in pushing their left-wing, anti-Trump, anti-safety agenda and demanding complete protection for illegal aliens from federal law enforcement officials.

Dave Jones, the current Insurance Commissioner, wants to push out Xavier Becerra, who's already in hot water and under pressure to comply with federal law. Becerra is standing by his corrupt decision to punish private businesses who work with ICE.

He is also standing by the evil, foolish law SB 54 to prevent law enforcement from cooperating with ICE to share key data to get rid of violent criminals, thugs, sex traffickers, and all other manner of vile human criminality.

You have to see this to believe it. Dave Jones is actually campaigning in direct defiance of the US Attorney General, President Trump, and the United States Constitution:

Dear Arthur,  While our current Attorney General was scheduled to speak at the law enforcement gathering where Attorney General Sessions announced his law suit against California,  I was proud to be the only statewide law enforcement leader outside on the street with hundreds protesting AG Sessions. We sent a clear message to Attorney General Sessions and President Trump. California will not be bullied.  We will defend our laws and our law abiding immigrant communities.  We wont cooperate in the deportation of our neighbors, our co-workers, our classmates, or the parents of our childrens' friends or their children. As Insurance Commissioner, I lead a law enforcement agency.  I have directed my law enforcement officers that we will not cooperate with ICE, consistent with the sanctuary state law SB 54.   We wont be stopped by Attorney General Sessions lawsuit. I was proud to stand with defenders of immigrants rights to support SB 54. As California's next Attorney General, I will do everything in my power and in the law to defend California from the Trump Administration. If you have not already done so, I hope you will join our campaign to elect a fighter, not a follower, to the office of Attorney General. Sincerely, Dave Jones California Insurance Commissioner and Candidate for Attorney General Dave Jones for Attorney General "A Fighter, Not a Follower." www.davejones2018.com    We don't need a social justice warrior. We need a law enforcement officer!

Arthur Schaper on KCAL9/KCBS News, Celebrating Trump Admin. Lawsuit Against Sanctuary State CA (Photos)

ICYMI: Roll Call Hack Confronted About Hatchet Job Against Sessions (Video)

                  


I attended Politicon 2017, along with a larger, growing phalanx of conservatives and Trump supporters. The last Politicon has a much lower Trump turnout because many feared the worse in Election 2016.

We had so much to celebrate in 2017, though, and anyone could see from the left-wing press that many of them were really unhappy with Trump's Victory.

Above, I interviewed Jonathan Allen about his hatred of Jeff Sessions.

Here's the hatchet piece he wrote against the Attorney General.

Tucker Carlson knocked him down like a boss!

I didn't let Allen get away with his anti-Sessions hate. It's fun to confront crappy reporters with an ax to grind against conservatives.

Tucker Carlson knocked it out of the park, and Allen lost a lot of credibility that day, and even the day that I confronted him. Notice how the handlers at the table told me to move away as soon as my line of questioning became more pointed!

Our Anglo-American Heritage: Liberating, Not Racist

In spite of a controversial first year with some setbacks and delays in enforcement, United States Attorney General Jeff Sessions has conducted a successful administration of the Department of Justice with restored enforcement of our nation’s laws. Despite his diligent efforts in cracking down on illegal immigration, gang violence, and sex trafficking, the liberal press focuses only on the fact that he is a white, male southerner. That’s racist and sexist in itself. Then this past week, they slammed him on their front pages again because he praised the “Anglo-American” heritage of our nation’s sheriff and their department.

Now what’s the problem?

Laughably and predictably, charges of racism emerged immediately, along with references back to his stalled nomination to the federal judiciary in the mid-1980s. Only Because of spurious accusations that he had made racial comments, including calling a black staffer “boy”, Sessions’ nomination was rejected. Let’s debunk those baseless smears at once, As Alabama State Attorney General, Sessions sued and bankrupted the KKK. He also fought to implement full desegregation of the Alabama public school system. Cased closed, revoke the Democrats’ race card.

If anything, the press needs to learn their history.

As to the statement in question, Sessions’ reference is not racist at all, but a glowing reminder for all of us that our culture is drawn from a rich legacy, fought over centuries, to enshrine power to individual citizens while protecting natural rights.

First off, let’s recognize the context of Session’s “sensational” words. He highlights the tradition of the voters electing their law enforcers so that they are accountable to the people. This aspect of self-rule and local control is essential to a vibrant, free society. We shouldn’t be surprised that the liberal press mocks the long-standing custom of the little people electing their rulers. The media has been fawning over North Korea’s well-dressed cheerleaders for the last two weeks in the Winter Olympics, ignoring the unspeakable atrocities of that brutal communist regime.

Second of all, the Anglo-American tradition which Sessions referred to is as anti-racist as it gets. That’s what makes the tradition commendable, praiseworthy. In her contentious yet enlightening interview with Jorge Ramos discussing on immigration three years ago, Ann Coulter talked about the “Anglo-American” culture which esteems women and children to the highest degree. She later rebuffed a young Latino conservative about the need to vote for leaders based on principle, not blood line or skin color. “This blood thing, not really a part of our Anglo-Saxon tradition”. Poor, corrupt, unfree countries have leadership which appeals to the masses based on ethnic ties or color, not the rule of law or inalienable rights.

The Anglo-Saxon, Anglo-American heritage is replete with examples how individuals working together, i.e “the little guy”, stood up to reprobate monarchs and rampant abuses of power.

1.       Magna Carta: The Great Charter of 1215. Originally titled the Great Charter of Liberties, outlined an agreement between King John and English barons who rebelled against their insufferable monarch. The extensive charter outlined clear-cut protections on justice, property, taxation, etc.

The significance of this document is that lower-ranking men stood up to their king, refusing to allow him to bully, rape, pillage, and dishonor them in their own country. Although this charter focused on the interests of barons as opposed to serfs and other less-propertied classes, the document signaled that men who were less than royalty or part of the ruling class in any country or community did not have to submit to the arbitrary will of the ruler. This development is unprecedented, as such political assertion had not occurred in Continental Europe or elsewhere.

Yes, this movement toward liberty occurred in England, so that makes it “Anglo.” That’s not racism or jingoist ethnocentrism. It’s a historical fact.

2.       The English Bill of Rights, 1689: Drawing from Magna Carta’s legal principles and legacy of commoners and landowners standing up a royal monarch, the British people rebelled against the increasingly dictatorial streak of King James II, a restored member of the Stuart household who was not only dead-set on reintroducing Catholicism to a predominantly Protestant country, but was curtailing liberties at an accelerated pace in his quest to do, including freedom of speech and assembly as well as removing judges and elected officers contrary to his political schemes.

The British people had already endured rebellion, the Republic, and then Restoration. They refused to regress into another tyranny. Parliament extended an offer to Prince William of Orange and his wife Mary, the daughter of King James to rule in place of the increasingly isolated, unpopular monarch. With relatively little military conflict, James fled for France, William and Mary became joint-rulers, and Parliament established their growing supremacy over the monarch. The people took on more power, and outlined further limitations on the head of state.

This Anglo-Saxon heritage is not racist, but worth rejoicing about!

From these political movements, and the documents which enshrined the will and rights of individual citizens, the Framers of the Declaration of Independence and the United States Constitution (themselves English citizens asserting their rights against the British Crown) drew further inspiration, outlining a system of government based on checks and balances; the diffusion of power among individual citizens, the several states, and the federal government; and the protection of life, liberty, and property.

Because of the lack of proper civics training in our current public education system, younger generations are leaning toward fully democratic institutions, collective attitudes, and socialist economic policies, all of which tend toward despotism rather than individual liberty. They even view as racist the very political heritage which has recognized and protected their freedoms.

A free society depends on the recognition of established, plenary, and eternal principles, in which there exist equal rights for all, special privileges for none, permitted expression of individual liberties, and a process for enforcing the law while respecting due process. The Anglo-Saxon legal and cultural traditions which AG Sessions alluded to make those political ideals real. Attorney General Sessions has nothing to apologize for.

AG Jeff Sessions: Let the #FISAgate Prosecutions Roll Like Waters

FOX NEWS:  Memo confirms Democrats paid foreign spy for fake dossier the FBI/DOJ used to spy on Trump campaign DEMAND ATTY GENERAL JEFF SESSIONS PROSECUTE: INSTA-SIGN >>> Arthur-- The much anticipated memo confirming Democrats abuse of power has been released. Here's what you should know: "...the FBI used the dubious dossier, prepared as campaign opposition research for Clinton's presidential bid, to get permission from the secret Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act court to eavesdrop on Trump campaign and transition team communications." -- Fox News Will you join me and demand Attorney General Jeff Sessions prosecute those involved? Help me gather 1,000,000 names in the next 72 hours! DEMAND ATTY GENERAL JEFF SESSIONS PROSECUTE: INSTA-SIGN >>> Arthur, despite the worst abuse of power since Watergate, we still won. We defeated the crooked Clinton machine, Obama, the liberal media, and made Donald J. Trump President. But imagine if we had lost. Imagine how corrupt things would be under another four or even eight years under Democrat control. Imagine if Congress hadn't voted to release the memo in the first place. We cannot ever let this happen again, in 2018, 2020, or even 2024. That's why I need you to demand prosecution and then make an immediate contribution to help gather 1,000,000 names in the next 72 hours. DEMAND ATTY GENERAL JEFF SESSIONS PROSECUTE: INSTA-SIGN >>> Sincerely, Ed Rollins, Chairman, Great America PAC P.S. It's time for Americans to know the full truth. We cannot ever let something like this happen again. Add your name and then help me the collect the additional signatures we need to demand prosecution!Thanks, Ed