Showing posts with label public safety. Show all posts
Showing posts with label public safety. Show all posts

Friday, July 17, 2026

Trump Is Righting Latin America

 


I am proud to be an American, not just because our nation has lasted 250 years with great success under the same charter, but because of our positive influence around the world.

In World War I, we turned the tide in favor of the Allied forces.

In World War II, Nazi totalitarianism would have won, but the United States bolstered Allied forces overseas and in the European theater. Japanese aggression throughout Southeast Asia, from 1931 to 1945, ended because of America. We dropped two atomic bombs on their homeland, and we forced their surrender.

The Cold War was the longest battle. Yes, there were fewer battles, but many sanctions, lots of threats, and too many incursions and expansions of communist influence around the world. The United States stood firm against the Soviet Union and its satellites. President Nixon’s rapprochement with China and Reagan’s tough diplomacy hastened the Soviet Union’s decline.

The world received an unexpected Christmas gift on December 25, 1991, when Mikhail Gorbachev declared the official dissolution of the Soviet Union.

North Korea still embraces its Stalinist cause, but faces increasing isolation, forcing them to allow increased economic liberalism.  China incorporated market reforms while retaining its authoritarian regime, but a population implosion, weakening trade, and increased indebtedness are dooming the country.

President Trump has increased the pressure on these rogue regimes, demanding economic freedom and political reforms. He has unchained American dependence on China; he has networked rapprochement between North Korea and South Korea; he has resisted Putin’s designs on Eastern Europe and the Caucasus Mountains. Indonesia and Vietnam have also become more friendly towards the United States. Freedom has a chance when nations begin to comply and cooperate with our country.

While Communism collapsed in Russia, it sadly relocated and re-emerged in Latin America. The cancer had already captured Cuba in 1958, then spread through Central and South America. Cartels and gangs filled the power vacuum, and Bush 41’s arrest of Manuel Noriega barely stemmed the tide. Further south, Peronist socialism ruined Argentina for decades, and juntas furthered the political disorder and collapse of freedom on the continent.

Latin America drowned in a red tsunami of communism during the early 2000s, as well. Bolivia floundered under the collectivist tyranny of the Evo Morales, and other Latin American states struggled to stay afloat in the midst of socialist machinations.

Latin America looked done for. America could finish off the Soviet Union, but what could the United States do about our neighbors to the South? If Stalinist Cuba could withstand embargoes, and hostile states like Iran, Russia, and China could form working relationships to undermine the law of nations and public order across the globe, what hope was there that we could turn things around?

President Trump has made all the difference through a savvy foreign policy regime while putting America First. Unlike previous presidents, Republican and Democrat, President Trump made immigration enforcement a cornerstone of his domestic and foreign policy. The free ride of cheap labor was over. He halted the teeming masses of upset refugees throughout the Americas from invading our country.

The message became clear to southern partners, neighbors, and adversaries: “The answer to your problems in your country will not be solved by running to our country.” Without the safe haven of the United States, the citizens of Central and South America had to look inward and turn their own countries around. They had to make do with their situation and find a way to restore order in their countries.

Thus arose Nayib Bukele in 2019. The mayor of San Salvador, he campaigned for president with a new party with a bold, basic platform of restoring civility, shutting down the terrorist gangs and cartels. He defeated the establishment of both major parties and became a human savior for the nation of El Salvador, locking up the prisoners, restoring law and order, then inviting economic investment. Murder rates in the former crime capital of the world have declined immensely—and he just won re-election by massive margins.

Then Argentina voted for freedom in 2023. Having Laboring under unrelenting government intervention, Argentina’s crippling inflation and moral collapse drove voters to take a chance on wily libertarian economics professor, Javier Milei. Adopting Trump’s mission and messaging, Milei took a chainsaw to the state and “the caste” of political insiders. Today, Inflation is crashing, jobs are growing, and law and order is being restored. The new rallying cry across the Land of Silver: Viva La Libertad, Carajo!

Milei credits Trump for his inspiration, and Trump 2.0 assisted Milei’s Congressional elections in 2025 with a credit swamp, which netted the United States massive gains and helped Milei gain power in Argentina’s Congress. He has passed effective economic reforms while cracking down on crime, stumping for life, family, and secured sovereignty.

Amazing!

And the MAGA-oriented right-wing shift has continued:

  • In Ecuador, Daniel Noboa, a center-right businessman with a pro-security platform, took office, winning in late 2023 against leftist Luisa González. His successes netted him a re-election victory in 2025.
  • In In Panama, right-wing candidate José Raúl Mulino won in May 2024, focusing on security and the economy.
  • In 2025, en.wikipedia.orgPresident Trump arrested Venezuelan President Nicolás Maduro in a swift, early-morning operation, accomplishing what previous administrations had promised. Maduro was arrested for rampant drug trafficking and terrorism. His successor has acquiesced to American diplomatic and business overtures while releasing political prisoners.
  • In Bolivia, Christian right-wing contender Rodrigo Paz Pereira ended twenty years of communist rule under Evo “Evil” Morales. Whoever said that you cannot vote your way out of communism?

en.wikipedia.org

  • In Chile, conservative Catholic José Antonio Kast won in late 2025 following a run-of, defeating a long-standing activist left-wing government which had sought to scrap Chile’s previous conservative reforms, including free market policies and school choice.

en.wikipedia.org

  • Honduras: Nasry Asfura (right-wing National Party) won in late 2025, defeating a leftist incumbent's ally.

en.wikipedia.org

facebook.com

  • Costa Rica: Laura Fernández Delgado (conservative/right-wing populist) won in February 2026. She campaigned aggressively on a pro-family platform, as well, denouncing the evils of abortion (just as Milei had done!)

en.wikipedia.org

  • Peru: Keiko Fujimori, daughter of populist former President Alberto, just won in June 2026.

reuters.com

  • In Colombia, another conservative Catholic, Abelardo de la Espriella, has replaced another left-wing narco-state-allied regime.

reuters.com

 

Look across Latin America today. The right is on the march, cleaning out the wreckage of socialism and communism. Free market reforms are ascending. Rejection of authoritarian regimes, recognition of the state of Israel, friendly concourse with the West, and en masse crackdowns on crime and corruption are redefining the region.

 US Senator Ted Cruz offered a profound vision regarding the incredible political rightward shift washing across Latin America:

“[I]f that happens, this would be the most consequential geopolitical shift since the fall of the Berlin Wall, since America won the Cold War without firing a shot.”

 

Indeed, and Trump deserves credit for this transformation. He provided a successful campaign template focused on illegal immigration, national pride and sovereignty, focusing on economic growth and freedom while promoting traditional values. Trump endorsed many of the candidates listed above, as well, and has offered his support since their election victories.

 

Trump started the trend, set the standard, and Latin America is going right along with him.

 

Sunday, June 20, 2021

Regarding the Homelessness Plans for the City of Torrance (June 22, 2021 Meeting)

To the Torrance City Council:

First of all, I share that it is very frustrating that the city dragged its feet for nearly two years to solve the homelessness problem in the city of Torrance, which has only grown increasingly worse. Manhattan Beach, CA addressed this problem very effectively three years ago. This kind of delay for necessary policy direct cannot become the norm in the city of Torrance.




Based on the documents in Item 9C, overall homelessness in the City of Torrance increased from 79 to 322 people. This is unconscionable. 

Regarding the three specific Administrative Agenda items:

9A: "Staff has recommended pursuing one of the two concepts that can be located entirely on City property, with the 34-space parking lot immediately adjacent to the Police Department as the preferred activation."

If this is the best location that the city can find, entirely within city property, thus removing the need to spend more funds to purchase property, then so be it. If a better lot, in an abandoned industrial location in the city, can be obtained, then that would be a better choice.


9B: I am glad to see that the anti-camping ordinance will preclude individuals from setting up tents in the park, as well as in other public locations throughout the city, including the beaches. In Wilson Park, over the last few months I have noticed a homeless person would routinely take up tables on the East side of the park, and this person would just leave a shopping cart full of bags. It was unsightly and disruptive. Thankfully, it appears that that person and the person's belongings have been removed.

Will this ordinance ensure that homeless individuals do not loiter in the public parks, as well, taking up multiple benches and tables with collected bags and other junk? This is still a possible problem that should be addressed and prevented.

9C: I am vocally opposed to any programs in connection with the South Bay City Council of Governments (SBCCOG). The last thing that any city needs is to form a further incestuous relationship with larger government agencies and bureaucracies. Frankly, the city of Torrance should exist the SBCCOG and retain our city funds for our own purposes. This is a terrible part of the plan which needs to be rejected outright.




This passage alone shows that our tax dollars not helping our local purposes:

In 2020 - 21, Measure H funds were made available to Council of Governments (COGs), including the SBCCOG, which covers a number of cities in the region, including Torrance, as part of "Innovation Grants." The SBCCOG received $739,685. The City of Redondo Beach received $245,287, and the Torrance received $50,000 to support retention of an Outreach Worker. The remaining $444,398 was used by the SBCCOG for regional projects, including education and outreach, development of a home sharing program, and providing client aid funds.

The vast majority of the monies are going to "regional projects." This is outrageous!

I strongly suggest that the city of Torrance maintain the strongest relationship connections with the city of Manhattan Beach and continue to follow their example, to the extent that they have successfully dealt with this homelessness issue while retaining the quality of life and character of their community.

I notice that the PLAN TO PREVENT AND COMBAT HOMELESSNESS stresses an extensive amount of education. I do not see the relevance or use of training every city employee how to deal with homelessness. Perhaps the police and fire departments, but that's it.

Furthermore, a simple plan which identifies that for many people on the streets, they are there because of drug use/abuse or mental health issues. Will there be any enforcement mechanisms to require chronically homeless individuals to receive help, get sober, etc. so that they can get back to living fulfilling and productive lives? I did not see any provided or even considered in the plan.

Last of all, my concerns--and the concerns of a growing number of residents in the city--have only grown in regards to government agencies and bureaucracies viewing the homelessness problem as just another way to hire more employees and seek more government funding. Homelessness is not going to solved with massive interventions of government money and material provision. If the city of Torrance gets into the "business" of handing out goods, services etc. the city government jwill not resolve but rather increase the homeless problem.

The city of Torrance, at the very least, must send a clear message discouraging transients and chronic homeless from coming to the city, wandering our streets, disturbing the public and residential areas, and blocking the thoroughfare and commerce of residents and businesses in the city.  Six months ago, I dealt with a homeless individual who was either inebriated or mentally ill. He was walking westbound on Monterey Street five blocks away from the US Post Office. He had a bottle of some kind and threw it a parked car. One passerby, a mother with her child, was very alarmed by the violent behavior from the transient. She was relieved that I called the police. The transient then began wandering eastbound toward Crenshaw Blvd. The Torrance Police arrived, and they confronted the individual for a few minutes, then let him go. 

As I have just related, I have directly encountered his homeless situation, specifically with a potentially violent altercation. Moreover, it has been quite alarming to see homeless taking up space in a number of the bus stop benches throughout the city and even on sidewalks in front of businesses along a number of strip malls throughout the city, too. This problem needs proper controls and enforcement protocols, not a bunch of trainings and overly-funded government junkets. There should be basic strategies in place to discourage transients, squatting, and increased movement of homeless into the city of Torrance, at the very least.

Last of all, I would advise disbanding the Social Services Commission and simply allow the professionals and well-established experts in dealing with homeless issues continue to take the lead on handling issues such as homelessness, as well as veterans issue and mental health concerns in the community. If after all their input and meetings, they have come up with mostly more paperwork and a few "toiletry giveaways", they have long outlived their usefulness. 

Sincerely,

Arthur Schaper

Wednesday, June 9, 2021

BREAKING: Torrance City Councilman Chen Seeks Resolution of No Confidence in George Gascon, Council Concurs for Agenda Item

VICTORY!

This is great news!

Councilman George Chen took the lead last night and called for a Resolution of No Confidence against LA County District Attorney George Gascon to be brought forward for the council to approve.



Check out the video of the city council meeting from June 8th, 2021.

Click here.

Five of the city council members in total supported an agenda time for a Resolution of No Confidence, too. Only Mayor Pat Furey refused to support the resolution agenda item!

All in all, this is good news! Your calls, your emails, your voice are being heard--as they should be!

Please contact Councilman Chen and thank him for taking this commonsense step to stop the reign of criminal terror and enabled lawlessness of LA County District Attorney George Gascon.

Email: gchen@torranceca.gov

Phone: (310) 618-2801

Please keep contacting the city council and tell them to vote YES on the Resolution when it is brought back to the city council for a final vote. Just because a resolution returns for a vote does not mean that it will get a final YES. Remember also that there are still nefarious elements in the city of Torrance and throughout the county (including Black Lives Matter) which are decidedly pro-criminal, anti-victim, and push for dangerous social justice warrior

Keep making your voices heard! Ensure that the city council votes for the Resolution of No Confidence once it comes before their council.

Torrance City Council Contacts

Pat Furey (pfurey@torranceca.gov);

George Chen (gchen@torranceca.gov);

Aurelio Mattucci (amattucci@torranceca.gov);

Sharon Kalani (skalani@torranceca.gov)

Mike Griffiths (mgriffiths@torranceca.gov);

Heidi Ashcraft (hashcraft@torranceca.gov);

Phone:   (310) 618-2801



To help recall LA County District Attorney George Gascon, visit this website:

https://recallgeorgegascon.com/



Or visit this website:

https://recallgasconnow.com/


Thursday, May 20, 2021

Torrance City Council: Pass Resolution of No Confidence in LA County DA George Gascon, Support Recall

Dear Torrance City Council: 

Public safety is of ultimate importance in any community. Families move to the city of Torrance for safety, as well as for the excellent schools and business opportunities. 

 

Public safety is being undermined, sadly, but the current District Attorney of Los Angeles County, George Gascon

 

His directives to the District Attorney's office are immoral, unethical, and in some cases, illegal. He has taken frequent steps to implement pro-criminal policies, even directing deputy prosecutors not to attend parole hearings, and also to offer lenient sentencing guidelines to judges. His memoranda against application of the death penalty, the decision to unilaterally ignore misdemeanor charges in many cases, his decision to refrain from trying heinous juvenile crimes as adults, among his directives for no money cash bail, fly in the face of the rule of law, the will of the voters, and the best practices for maintenance of public safety. 




 

His failures as a leader have elicited outrage across the political spectrum, from retired LA County Supervisor Mike Antonovich to LA County Sheriff Alex Villanueva. Victims’ Rights groups, which are not and should never be partisan, are leading the fight to have Gascon recalled, as well. 

 

I submit that even though Gascon was elected per official reports with a majority of the vote, the fact is that dubious voting and election practices have made the outcomes of local and county elections in Los Angeles County more suspect. However, regardless of the outcome of the election in November 2020, Gascon is a clear and present danger to the public safety of all Los Angeles County residents. 

 

The city of Beverly Hills has wisely taken the simple yet direct steps of issuing a resolution of No Confidence in DA George Gascon

 

I urge the Torrance City Council to follow Beverly Hills and issue a similar Resolution of No Confidence. I would go one step further and also urge the city of Torrance to support the recall of the current District Attorney, since his lack of commitment to law and order, to safety and security, to justice and restoration are so skewed, or so lacking, that one has to wonder how he can call himself a public servant of any degree or integrity. 

 

In the link below, you will find a sample of the resolution of No Confidence passed by the Beverly Hills City Council on March 16, 2021, specifically pages 6-8. 

 

https://beverlyhills.granicus.com/MetaViewer.php?view_id=49&event_id=5139&meta_id=464736 

 

I urge the city council to consider this move. 

 

Thank you for your time. 

 

Sincerely, 


Arthur Schaper


Please contact the Torrance City Council and urge them to issue a resolution of No Confirence in corrupt, pro-criminal Los Angeles District Attorney George Gascon!


Torrance City Council Contacts

 

Pat Furey (pfurey@torranceca.gov);

George Chen (gchen@torranceca.gov);

Aurelio Mattucci (amattucci@torranceca.gov);

Sharon Kalani (skalani@torranceca.gov)

Mike Griffiths (mgriffiths@torranceca.gov);

Heidi Ashcraft (hashcraft@torranceca.gov);

 

City Clerk Rebecca Poirier (rpoirier@torranceca.gov);

City Manager Aram Chaparyan (achaparyan@torranceca.gov);

City Attorney Patrick Sullivan (psullivan@torranceca.gov);

Chief of Police Jon Megeff (jmegeff@torranceca.gov)

Phone:   (310) 618-2801


Friday, June 8, 2018

LAPD New Police Chief Michel Moore: What We Need To Know

Last month, I received an email from a source named "Rainbow Frozen", who had no interest in sharing with me his (or her) real name.

This person was warning me about the next LAPD Police Chief pick:

Hello Arthur,

Wanted to make you aware of the current precipice Trump supporters (and all Republicans) in the city of Los Angeles are teetering on: the very real possibility that Deputy Chief Arcos will be the next Chief of Police.

His opinion on "Trump" and "Trump supporters" is unmistakable... contrary, antagonistic and disrespectful. In this youtube video, published on 4/21/18, at the 8:06 mark, he very clearly makes his opinion known while speaking about preparing for May Day: "facilitating everyone's voice, even the pro-Trumpers that come out, we're gonna give them their little spot, all 10 of them, and all 10 of them bring a bull horn so it sounds like they have a lot more people than they have" where then his audience laughs.



Deputy Chief Arcos is one of the top 3 candidates forwarded to Mayor Garcetti by the Police Commission*. Should he become Chief of Police, the writing on the wall is clear: Trump supporters better get used to having a "little spot" on the side! And yet, according to him, when asked his opinion on Black Lives Matter: "they bring up important issues...."! (21:56 mark)

I'd love to hear about a protest or picket line at City Hall to let Mayor Garcetti know that Deputy Chief Arcos doesn't represent all Angeleno's before he is selected as the new Police Chief... yes, even if it is only 10 of us. I've checked your facebook page and didn't see anything regarding the selection of the new LAPD Police Chief.  Is anything planned? Perhaps this youtube video should be shared on your facebook page?

The last thing that anyone needed for Los Angeles was a disrespectful police chief who didn't believe equity before the law!

The writer then shared the following links with me to warn me about Arcos.



Now for the good news.

The new police chief is someone else, and I may not look his stance on every issue, at least he sounds like someone who is fair.

New Pick for LAPD Police Chief Revealed (For Courtroom News)

LOS ANGELES (CN) – Mayor Eric Garcetti selected Michel Moore to head the Los Angeles Police Department Monday, a veteran of the force and a crime statistics expert who says he wants to build trust between police and communities.



OK. We all know what that means, right? This pick is not interested in enforcing immigration laws. Of course, since 1979, Special Order 40 has precluded those efforts. Wouldn't it be nice to have elected officials who cared about protecting citizens?

At a crowded press room in the mayor’s office, Garcetti described Moore, 54, as “one of if not the most qualified law enforcement professional in America” who doesn’t need to hit the ground running because “he is already running.”

The mayor told reporters he’d only made his decision early Monday and called Moore shortly after to offer him the position.

Moore – who was passed up for the same job back when he applied in 2009 – said he wants to build on the accountability and technological reforms initiated in recent years by his predecessor Charlie Beck, who is set to retire June 27.

Why did Charlie Beck get the job in the first place? That police chief thought it was acceptable for illegal aliens to get drivers licenses and to live "freely" in Los Angeles. Also, the chief did nothing about the bootleg sellers along the sidewalks in MacArthur Park. When will the representatives of our cities stop this corruption?

Hector Villagra, executive director of the American Civil Liberties Union of Southern California, said Moore must expand the “humane” policies he has previously developed with the group.

“The new chief must commit himself and the LAPD to working collaboratively with all the communities of Los Angeles to address vital issues including completely disentangling the department from federal immigration enforcement and limiting dragnet surveillance,” Villagra said. “Moore, if confirmed, must also adopt de-escalation policies, reform gang enforcement practices and increase transparency and accountability around officer misconduct.”

The ACLU only cares about illegal aliens. Since when do criminals count as a "community"?

When asked about SB 54, the state’s so-called Sanctuary State bill that limits police collaboration and interaction with immigration enforcement agencies, Moore said “the LAPD will respect the dignity” of every resident.

“An individual’s immigration status doesn’t matter to us,” he said. “We will concern ourselves with public safety.”

Moore gave a non-answer. I guess that's the best we can hope for going forward.

Garcetti hailed Moore as a reformer and a “rethinker” at the center of the department’s recent challenges.

In recent years, Moore has been at the center of the Los Angeles Police Department challenges around police shootings, immigration and corruption. He took over the reins at the Rampart Community Police Station after a corruption scandal overshadowed the force in the 1990s.

Moore said he wanted LAPD personnel to know they could “step forward” to address challenges in policing and offer ideas and innovations.

Opposing corruption is good, but we still have this problem: "Who will watch the watchers themselves?"

Final Reflection

This chief of police candidate is focused on public safety, and he kept it as simple as that. Let's see what happens going forward. From what I have read so far, he doesn't sound like a political ideologue. Let's hope that conservatives, and Trump supporters in particular, will be able to stay safe and show our love and support for our President in public demonstrations in the years to come.

Tuesday, June 5, 2018

The White House Stands With California, Opposes Sanctuary Jurisdictions

The White House, Washington

Thank you for taking the time to express your views regarding sanctuary cities.
Sanctuary cities refuse to cooperate with Federal immigration enforcement by declining to share information relating to potentially removable aliens and rejecting “detainer” requests from U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE). Detainers are used to request that a State or local law enforcement agency hold a criminal alien in custody for up to 48 hours after their scheduled release on State charges to allow ICE to take custody of the alien and initiate removal proceedings. This dangerous and unlawful refusal to share information with Federal immigration officers or honor detainer requests threatens the safety of all Americans.
Sanctuary policies endanger the safety of our communities by obstructing immigration enforcement actions that can prevent further crime. Too many families residing in sanctuary cities have suffered tremendously due to sanctuary policies, even to the point of losing loved ones at the hands of known criminal aliens who were released by State or local law enforcement.
My Administration will continue to pursue strong immigration enforcement based on the rule of law, including standing up to sanctuary cities. The Department of Justice (DOJ) has filed a legal action challenging three California laws that intentionally obstruct Federal immigration enforcement. I also signed an Executive Order that informed sanctuary cities that failure to abide by Federal immigration laws would jeopardize their access to certain Federal grant money. Additionally, the DOJ has laid out new guidelines requiring jurisdictions to cooperate with Federal immigration authorities in order to receive Edward Byrne Memorial Justice Assistance Grants, a leading source of Federal law enforcement funding.
Thank you again for writing. To learn more about the actions my Administration is taking to enforce our Nation’s immigration laws, please visit WhiteHouse.gov/Immigration. As President, I will continue to fulfill my constitutional duty to faithfully execute the immigration laws of our Nation.

Sincerely,
Donald Trump
Privacy Policy | Contact the White House

Monday, April 23, 2018

BREAKING! Supervisor Hahn Stands With Violent Criminals, Will Not Oppose SB 54

Supervisor Janice Hahn replaced Don Knabe on the Los Angeles County Board of Supervisors in 2016.



The Board has taken a hard-left turn since then. Instead of properly caretaking the needs of California citizens, they are pandering to illegal aliens and their social justice warrior enablers. Labor unions get all the attention and the seats at the table, while the rest of us are expected to pay for it.

Janice Hahn is the daughter of Kenneth Hahn, a civil rights leader who championed American citizens, particularly black Americans who had suffered incredible prejudice around the country. Now they are under attack because of illegal aliens, the mass migration which is pushing them out of their homes in different neighborhoods all over the county.

And let's not forget all other LA County citizens. What about our rights?

I contact Supervisor Hahn and her staff regarding SB 54, urging her and her colleagues to oppose this terrible "Sanctuary State" law and put the safety of LA County residents first.

Here's the outrageous response I received:


“Dear Mr. Schaper,

Thank you very much for taking the time to share with us your opinion on SB 54.  However, we must agree to occasionally disagree, and on this matter, we respectfully disagree.  The Los Angeles County Sheriff’s Department is not an immigration enforcement bureau, and Sheriff McDonnell has said as much.  The Sheriff’s deputies are already woefully understaffed and stretched thin; we do not want to add on collateral duties to their daily jobs that are not part of their mandate.  Immigrants are a vibrant part of our County who work in our tech industries, our hotels, and in our universities.  We celebrate immigrants and all of the positive impacts that they have on our communities.

Sincerely,

The Office of Supervisor Janice Hahn”

It absolutely incenses me that our elected officials want to reduce this demonstrably serious issue to nothing more than a point of disagreement. Reasonable individuals can agree or disagree about which flavor of ice cream tastes the best.

When it comes to illegal immigration, public safety, and our elected officials's respective oaths of office, there can be no debate. SB 54 violates federal law and the United States Constitution, and it makes no difference whether a small class of federal jurists intend to agree or disagree.

The safety of LA County residents cannot be debated, and SB 54 is protecting criminals of all classes from deportation. They should not be in the country, let alone Los Angeles County, and we taxpayers should demand at the very least that our elected officials place our safety at the highest priority.

Hahn is siding with violent criminals and ignoring her oath of office. Notice also that her letter tries to blur the difference between immigrants--those who have entered this country legally--from those who have broken into this country--illegal aliens.

Such a lack of distinction is patently offensive. 

I urge every reader to contact the Los Angeles County Board of Supervisors and demand that they uphold their oath of office, oppose SB 54, and cooperate with federal immigration officials to ensure safe streets and sound communities in Los Angeles County.

Here is my extended response to the Office of Supervisor Janice Hahn:

Representative Janice Hahn:

CC: Mrs. Eubanks:

Thank you for your writing to me regarding my concerns about SB 54, the so-called "Sanctuary State" law.

I must forcefully challenge the response issued by Mrs. Eubanks and your office.

First, never did I assert that LA County Sheriff must divert his resources to enforce immigration laws. You are not respecting the intent and concerns of my letter.

Second of all, LA County Sheriff Jim McDonnell bravely opposed SB 54 precisely because it is a public safety issue, regardless of one's stance on immigration. I am disheartened that you, Supervisor Hahn, and your colleagues have differed with LA County's chief law enforcement officer.



You need to respect his insight and experience and oppose SB 54. With ICE out of LA County jails, immigration enforcement officials have had no choice but to enter local communities, including schools, hospitals, and neighborhoods. These actions endanger our law enforcement and our law-abiding citizenry.

The Los Angeles Times reported that ICE officials were harassed by local activists, and the LAPD officers on duty could not help their fellow brothers in law enforcement:

www.latimes.com
A crowd of activists blocked a Homeland Security van late Thursday from accessing the detention center in downtown Los Angeles. The protest started in response to ICE raids this week that led to the detention of more than 100 people.


Such behavior is unbecoming, unconscionable, and unconstitutional. Our federal officials have every right to enforce federal laws in every state of the union, including California. SB 54 directly contravenes federal law regarding the requirements that local and state officials share information regarding the location and release times of illegal aliens arrested, convicted, and incarcerated in our jails. This legislation is placing small business owners and private firms in an impossible bind, as well, since they face prosecution from the state attorney general if they cooperate with ICE, particularly in regards to audits; or they face federal prosecution for not cooperation with ICE in those instances.

Third, having written the above, I must emphasize that SB 54 is protecting violent criminals, allowing them to be released back onto Los Angeles County streets, when they should be turned over to immigration officials. California citizens like Sandra Duran of North Hills and Ronald De Silva of El Monte were killed by illegal aliens who had multiple convictions yet were still released onto our streets or had skirted immigration enforcement.

These deaths should have never happened, and therefore these outcomes are outrageous. You and your colleagues should meet with the Angel Moms and Dads whose children have been murdered by illegal aliens. Then tell them directly to their faces that you choose to stand by this lawless policy.

Fourth, it is offensive to me that your office uses the term "immigrant" as though there is no distinction between among the millions who followed the law to enter this country legally vs. those who broke into this country illegally--they are illegal aliens, not immigrants. By the way, I have never once questioned the good will and worth of law-abiding citizens who entered this as immigrants. Your letter assumes otherwise.

I have many friend who immigrated to this country--i.e. they came legally. They are the Mayor of Westminster Tri Ta; Nick Iaonnidis, the Founder of Immigrants Day; and Agnes Gibboney, whose son Ronald was murdered in El Monte (as mentioned above). They all worked very hard and waited a long time to become citizens.



Last of all, Representative Hahn, you took an oath of office to uphold and defend the United States Constitution. Your decision to disregard that oath and support SB 54, a patently unconstitutional piece of legislation in conflict with our Founding Charter and federal laws, calls into question your judgment and the legitimacy of your office. 

If you will not abide by your oath, then you must resign immediately. I must ask, since your father Kenneth Hahn was a diligent civil rights activist for American citizens, particularly black communities--which have been adversely impacted by illegal immigration--What would your father say to your dereliction of duty?

I will be informing every local official and constituent regarding your unjust decision on this matter. You must speak out against SB 54 and put the safety of American citizens first.

Sincerely,

Arthur Schaper


Here is the contact information for the LA County Board of Supervisors:

First District – Hilda Solis
856 Kenneth Hahn Hall of Administration
500 West Temple Street
Los Angeles, CA 90012
Phone: (213) 974-4111 Fax: (213) 613-1739

Second District – Mark Ridley-Thomas
500 W. Temple Street Room 866.
Los Angeles, CA 90012
(213) 974-2222

Third District – Sheila Kuehl
821 Kenneth Hahn Hall of Administration
500 W. Temple St.
Los Angeles, CA 90012
Phone: (213) 974-3333  





Fourth District – Janice Hahn
500 W. Temple Street, Room 822
Los Angeles, CA 90012
Tel: (213) 974-4444
fourthdistrict@bos.lacounty.gov

Fifth District – Kathryn Barger
500 West Temple Street, Room 869
Los Angeles, CA 90012
(213) 974-5555

Tell them to put Americans First, tell them to side with law-abiding citizens, the LA County Sheriff, and with the men and women who put their lives on the line every day to protect LA County residents.