Showing posts with label immigration enforcement. Show all posts
Showing posts with label immigration enforcement. Show all posts

Sunday, January 20, 2019

The “Not Racist” Drama of Congressman Steve King

Republicans have been playing defense on the race card for far too long. Their instinctive need to make nice with the trigger-happy, race-baiting media has forced so many conservatives into a corner, preventing serious discussions about race: how it should matter less, but still matters only because of Democrats who exploit color differences to push their extreme, socialist policy goals.

The last controversy to blow open this genuflective self-loathing among Republicans has occured because of remarks which Congressman Steve King (R-Iowa) had made to the New York Times a few days ago. 



Here's what Congressman King said:

“White nationalist, white supremacist, Western civilization — how did that language become offensive?” Mr. King said. “Why did I sit in classes teaching me about the merits of our history and our civilization?”

Putting nationalism and white supremacy in the same sentence is wrong. Supremacy based on skin color is patently ridiculous. However, the former bulldozer operated did not advocate for white supremacy. This representative was trying to criticize the shouts of racism, the empty epithets of hate from the Left which they rely on to silence conservatives. Later, King went to further lengths to clarify his remarks: “I want to make one thing abundantly clear: I reject those labels and the evil ideology they define.”

There. Congressman King cleaned up his statements. Many people have uttered misstatements on a range of issues before, and they have corrected myself. So did this official.

Then the real problem emerges. What has caused this conflagration of fiery issues and misunderstandings to break out? With a cursory glance at the article published by the New York Times, it’s clear that the Times is pushing another substantially offensive bias of their own, and right in the title of the article:
Unbelievable! King has never opposed immigration per se. However, he has been a vocal, consistent critic of illegal immigration, and he has demanded the removal of illegal aliens from the United States. Consider Mexico, with some of the most draconian immigration laws in the world. Colombia has a wall with Venezuela.; Israel has two walls. Compared to these countries, the United States is extensively lenient when it comes to illegal immigration. 

The New York Times engages in unmistakable bias toward call King by calling him "anti-immigrant" in the title. Even the article contradicts its misleading headline:

At the same time, he said, he supports immigrants who enter the country legally and fully assimilate because what matters more than race is “the culture of America” …

King is not anti-immigrant. He’s also no racist.
Here’s the real problem: Republicans are forced to prove that they are "not racist". This challenge (From the left) turns into bottomless, self-loathing. How does one prove a negative? The progressives, with the real history of racism, will never stop playing the race card against opponents. Someone could have a black wife, Hispanic kids, Asian parents, a long pedigree of non-white, non-European ancestors, etc.

Incidentally enough, what King is enduring now is precisely what he was decrying! One more time, the "race card" has turned into a perennial distraction from more substantive issues. Congressman King is being pilloried by a political establishment desperate to prove that they are "not racist".

This hasty damage-control action from Minority Leader McCarthy is proof positive that the knee-jerk reaction of mea cupla in the face of the false claims of racism has still not left establishment-leaning Republicans. President Trump fights back against the Fake News Fraud of the liberal legacy media. They keep chanting "Racism! Racism! Racism!" about border security and retention of American culture. McCarthy launches into castigating King for inartful statements. Desperate to be liked by the legacy media, failed Presidential candidate and now carpetbagger US Senator Mitt Romney hostilely attacks Trump's manners and demeanor. Sad!

Of course, there’s more to this controversy:

1. Kevin McCarthy, the new GOP House minority leader, is consolidating power against conservative insurgents. Four years ago, McCarthy had a chance to be Speaker of the House but for his own flippant remarks about the Benghazi investigations. He (honestly, yet unwisely) suggested that those hearings were meant to hurt Hillary Clinton's Presidential election bid. How ironic that McCarthy wants to tar and feather King for an inartful phrase, when he was publicly pilloried for the same failing. (and how about those allegations that McCarthy was having a long-term affair?)

2. The Big Business, Cheap Labor Lobby wants to get rid of one of their biggest opponents in Congress. King remains a thorn in the side to every Chamber of Commerce donor and Congressional puppet in both chambers of Congress and throughout the DC Swamp. He was Trump before The Donald appeared on the scene. If the amnestarians can't stop the President, they will settle for King.

3.The NeverTrumpers want a scalp, too. Even the NeverTrumper conservative mag National Review has jumped into the anti-King mosh pit. The Weekly Standard would have done the same thing if they hadn't folded a month ago. Honestly, when even the former Buckley flagship rag wants to toss you overboard, you should prepare for smooth sailing. After all, their "Never Trump" issue didn't make a damn difference in stopping his election, and Trump has accomplished more conservative goals in two years than all the Republican Presidents elected during William F. Buckley's lifetime, including Reagan.

Was Congressman King’s statement inartful? Yes. Is he a racist? No. This whole King controversy is another example of the liberal media straining to way to paint an effective conservative as a racist, and all the other Republicans in Congress are scrambling to denounce him so that they don't get tarred with the race card because they said nothing. This bumbling is sad, so sickening, especially because Congressman King has championed many conservative causes, including life, liberty, and the restoration of American sovereignty. Let’s hope he stands firm in the face of this race-baiting onslaught from both sides of the aisle.

Wednesday, September 12, 2018

United We Dream Faults Trump for Funding ICE

Arthur,
Right now, thousands in Puerto Rico still don’t have power in their homes. Hurricane Florence is about to hit the east coast. And we just found out that Trump robbed TEN MILLION DOLLARS from tens of thousands of families waiting for recovery efforts in FEMA funds to give to ICE. Check out this New York Times headline for yourself:
$10 Million From FEMA Diverted to Pay for Immigration Detention Centers, Document Shows Image
This is absolutely disgusting, and yet another reason why we must elect leaders who will fight to defund ICE and protect immigrants. Can you contribute now to fund our Here to Stay campaign, and help us spread this message to voters?
Contribute »
This Republican obsession with detaining immigrants in cages is cruel andexpensive. Voters deserve to know that their leaders chose to spend their tax money dehumanizing and hurting immigrants, instead of providing disaster relief -- and the only way they’re sure to find out is if we reach them at the doors and on the phones through our Here To Stay campaign.
We need your help to ensure that every voter knows what their representatives are doing to hurt immigrants, and where they’re getting the funding to run detention camps. Can you chip in now to help us spread the word?
With you on our side, we’re going to be able to defeat the monsters that allowed this to happen, and elect real champions for immigrants in their place. I hope we can count on you to stand with us, and make this election count.
-- Juli and the rest of the team at United We Dream Action

Wednesday, June 6, 2018

Call Congress! No DACA Amnesty! Stop the Deal!

We The People Rising http://wethepeoplerising.com
EMAIL robinhvidston@wethepeoplerising.com or  rhvidston1@yahoo.com
Email not displaying correctly?
View it in your browser.

 

NumbersUSA
Jun. 6th, 2018
URGENT
ACTION
Author Photo
 

Media outlets reporting that House Republicans are nearing a deal on DACA amnesty -- Call and insist that any deal reduces legal immigration by ending chain migration and mandates E-Verify

Dear activist,
We're just 24 hours away from a key meeting between House Republicans where GOP Leaders hope to announce a deal that would award an amnesty to at least 1 million illegal aliens. According to media reports, key negotiators are close to striking a deal.
We need your urgent phone calls TODAY before tomorrow's meeting to Majority Leader Kevin McCarthy telling him that any deal on DACA must reduce legal immigration by ending chain migration and must require employers to use E-Verify.
Leader McCarthy -- (855) 827-2356
Leader McCarthy is currently working on a plan to stave off a discharge petition started by pro-amnesty House Republicans that would force floor votes on several bad amnesty bills. The discharge petition needs just three more signatures to force the votes, and petition organizers say that they have the signatures.
That's why we need your urgent phone calls TODAY to Leader McCarthy!
Leader McCarthy -- (855) 827-2356
When you reach his leadership office, you can use the following talking points:
I agree with the majority of American voters who support reducing legal immigration through ending chain migration and ending most future illegal immigration by requiring all employers to use E-Verify.

Any deal on DACA must reduce legal immigration by ending chain migration and require all employers to use E-Verify!
Thank you for your activism,
New Actions
CHRIS CHMIELENSKI

Saturday, February 24, 2018

Congressman Labrador Exposes Pro-Illegal Schemes of the United States Senate

Democrats and Republicans in the United States Senate wanted to put Big Business and La Raza ahead of the American People on the four immigration bills which came to a floor vote last week.

All of them failed, including Toomey's common sense ban on federal grants to sanctuary cities. Shameful.



Congressman Raul Labrador, who is running for Governor of Idaho, revealed the real wranglings behind the scenes on the different immigration bills which got a floor vote, especially the abortive Schumer-Rounds-Collins compromise, which was anything but common sense:

Dear Friends,
Hanging in my office in Washington, D.C., is a famous Charles Schulz cartoon. Once again, Charlie Brown falls for Lucy’s trick, as she pulls away the football and leaves Charlie on his backside. That image captures exactly what happens over and over again in Washington.

Now we have the football:


Senate Democrats, led by Chuck Schumer, tried to fool the American people last week with an immigration bill they claimed would give President Trump $25 billion over 10 years to secure our border in return for legalizing young illegal immigrants who were brought here as children.
The truth is, the Schumer bill was a bad joke. It guaranteed funding for only the first year (so, just 10 percent of what President Trump asked for). Every year after that, funding would be contingent on a report and certification by the Homeland Security Department – a process that is purposefully onerous and difficult to achieve, meaning the money would either be delayed or remain unspent. Furthermore, should a Democrat be elected President in the next 10 years, we know the Homeland Security Department would never seek certification and the money would never be spent.

Bureaucrats are a Democrat's best friend. They routinely cheat and lie, promising so much that conservatives want to hear, then run away from the actual program and push through only the stuff which helps their agenda.

It's time that more conservatives wake up to these serious problems in our government. They don't follow through on their promises, and they have little interest in solving the major issues in a way that are actually helpful and worthwhile with the needs of the American people.
In return for this pittance, the Schumer bill would legalize 3 to 4 million illegal immigrants - not just the 690,000 DACA enrollees, but everyone who is eligible for the program, their parents, and many others.  So the Schumer bill would legalize a population five times greater than what many Republicans are willing to accept for only about 10 percent of the border money. And Schumer called that a fair deal. 

No more legalizing illegal aliens. We need to put the needs of Americans First.
Predictably, the liberal media swallowed Schumer’s talking points, blaming the President for refusing a deal to protect DACA recipients.  Once again, conservatives who attempt to compromise are accused of bargaining in bad faith, when the truth is Democrats want porous borders and are using the so-called “Dreamers” as political pawns.

The media can make any arguments they want, but no one believes them. It's crystal clear to anyone paying attention that the Democratic Party never wanted to solve this illegal alien mess. They only wanted to foment this never-ending wedge issue to their political gain.

Now their time has run out, and Democrats are sore losers with nothing to show for their half measures to an increasingly enraged base.
The President has always been clear on the four provisions required to win his signature: border security, ending chain migration, cancelling the visa lottery and a reasonable DACA solution. The Schumer bill only fully addressed DACA, guaranteed just one year of funding for a wall, and completely ignored the other two issues.



An insult, not just a bad joke.
The good news is Republicans didn’t fall for the Democrats’ trick. This time, Charlie didn’t let Lucy take the football, to the disappointment of the media. Even better, there is growing support for a conservative bill that I have been fighting for in the House.

The bill is pretty good, except for the DACA part. No amnesty, no legal status, and everything else is a go.
After the Senate failed to advance any bill, the President reiterated his support for the Securing America’s Future Act, which I co-authored with House Judiciary Chairman Bob Goodlatte, R-Va., House Homeland Security Chairman Michael McCaul, R-Texas, and Homeland Security Subcommittee Chairwoman Martha McSally, R-Ariz.
In a statement after the Senate theatrics, the President’s press secretary said, “The next step will be for the House to continue advancing the proposal from Chairman Goodlatte and Chairman McCaul.”

I doubt that this piece of legislation is going anywhere. Rep. Mark Meadows of the Freedom Caucus was quite pessimistic about anything coming through the US Senate ever. The whole process must begin in the House of Representatives, the more populist branch of government, which at this time has presented a piece of legislation far more response to President Trump's agenda.
Our bill fulfills the promise to fix our broken immigration system and is endorsed by NumbersUSA, the leading advocacy group for conservative immigration reform.

NumbersUSA is OK with the legislation. That is interesting and good. I still do not want to support any kind of legal status for illegal aliens, even if it's a temporary three-month stayover.
First, we secure our borders, including a southern border wall and other measures. Second, we stop chain migration and eliminate the visa lottery. Third, we boost interior enforcement, including cracking down on “sanctuary cities” and combatting asylum fraud. Finally, we provide legal status for current recipients of the DACA program. 

Will it be the last part? Are we certain that those illegal aliens will not be granted anything until everything else is put in place?
Last week, House leadership took steps to begin moving our bill forward. Nearly 200 House Republicans have committed to support the bill and we’re continuing to work to build additional support. 


The next step in this process is clear: We need the House to take action and hold a floor vote on our bill.  As my friend, Rep. Mark Meadows, R-N.C., said: “If the House is going to wait for 60 Senators to figure out an immigration bill first, we might as well all go home and take a nap. The House should not wait on the Senate to act. We already have a bill that delivers on the voters' priorities. Let's lead.” 

Get rid of the DACA part, and all will be well.
The American people support our approach, according to recent polling. The Harvard-Harris poll found 65 percent support a deal for DACA that ends chain migration, eliminates the visa lottery, and secures the border with a wall. The Securing America's Future Act is the only bill in Congress that does all those things.

How about a bill without the DACA part?
We have to get this right; otherwise we put public safety, our economy and billions in taxpayer dollars at risk. I will continue the fight for common sense legislation that protects Idahoans and all Americans.

If you’d like to learn more details, click here for a one-page summary of our bill. To read the entire bill click here.  
Thank you,

Final Reflection

I am aware that government and legislation is a balancing act. All of that is true, but there are some issues which are simply not open to compromise. The federal government has an essential responsibility to secure our borders and protect the rights of Americans. That is not something that we should have to bargain or barter for.



I can assure you that this legislation will go nowhere in the United States Senate. Ted Cruz will vote against it, since it provides a pathway to citizens for a population of illegal aliens. Every single Democrat will vote against it for purely partisan reasons. Even if four of the ten vulnerable Senate Democratic incumbents were to vote for this legislation, that would generate a total of 54 aye votes.

Not enough to overcome a filibuster.

I think it's time for us to wait until 2019, when Republicans can have a better chance of winning more seats in the House and Senate and pass a more substantive set of bills on many issues, including repeal of Obamacare, immigration enforcement, Second Amendment issues, and more.

Saturday, January 27, 2018

Immigration Reformers: We 'Mobilized' to 'Defeat' Past Amnesties, Will Do Same with This Amnesty Plan

We The People Rising http://wethepeoplerising.com
EMAIL robinhvidston@wethepeoplerising.com or  rhvidston1@yahoo.com
Email not displaying correctly?
View it in your browser.


Immigration Reformers: We ‘Mobilized’ to ‘Defeat’ 

Past Amnesties, Will Do Same with White House Amnesty Plan


 

immigration

by JOHN BINDER  26 Jan 2018  Washington, D.C.
http://www.breitbart.com/big-government/2018/01/26/immigration-reformers-we-mobilized-to-defeat-past-amnesties-will-do-same-with-white-house-amnesty-plan/

Pro-American immigration reformers are vowing to help “defeat” a plan by White House advisers to give U.S. citizenship to millions of illegal aliens.

 Roy Beck, the president of NumbersUSA, which advocates for an immigration policy that benefits American workers, said in a statement that his powerful network of amnesty opponents is ready to fight, should White House advisers continue pushing the expansive amnesty plan.
Beck said:
NumbersUSA has no choice but to oppose what is being suggested as the White House “framework” for a mass amnesty.  The plan seems eerily similar to the blueprint used for the 2007 Bush-Kennedy amnesty, which appeared to end chain migration, but wouldn’t actually end it for 17 years. NumbersUSA mobilized our huge grassroots army to defeat the 2007 amnesty, and we will do the same if this plan is proposed next week.
Under the White House framework, young-adult illegal border crossers and visa overstayers would get immediate benefits, including, most importantly, the right to compete with Americans in the permanent job market.  But vulnerable American workers would get little or no relief from the competition of chain migration for 15 to 20 years.  Even if new applications for chain migration categories are stopped immediately, the framework would allow chain migration to continue for decades by allowing all of the four million foreigners in the waiting list to continue coming. 
The plan, crafted by officials including former Koch Brothers executive Marc Short, Chief of Staff Gen. John Kelly, Department of Homeland Security (DHS) Kirstjen Nielsen, and senior adviser Stephen Miller, would begin by giving a pathway to U.S. citizenship to at least 1.8 million illegal aliens who are enrolled or eligible for the President Obama-created Deferred Action for Childhood Arrivals (DACA) program.
The plan also includes:
  • A nearly 10-year wait before extended-family chain migration is ended, providing no immediate relief to Americans
  • A repurposing of the 50,000 visas that currently import foreign nationals through the Visa Lottery
  • $25 billion to fund the construction of a wall along the U.S.-Mexico border
  • No provisions to enact mandatory E-Verify, which would ban employers from hiring illegal aliens
  • No provisions to deal with the issue of ending birthright citizenship
Like Beck’s NumbersUSA, Kansas Secretary of State Kris Kobach — one of the leading pro-American immigration reformers in the country — told Breitbart News that the expansive amnesty is “an extremely bad idea,” as it does not suggest how it would limit the amnesty.

As with the 1986 amnesty, the White House advisers’ amnesty plan has the potential to lead to massive amounts of fraud, allowing millions more ineligible illegal aliens to gain a pathway to U.S. citizenship. The plan, additionally, does not include provisions that would prevent future administrations from waving the pathway to citizenship requirements, opening the amnesty up to potentially the full 12 to 30 million illegal aliens living in the U.S.

Every year, the U.S. admits more than 1.5 foreign nationals, with the vast majority deriving from family-based chain migration, whereby newly naturalized citizens can bring an unlimited number of foreign relatives to the U.S. In 2016, the legal and illegal immigrant population reached a record high of 44 million. By 2023, the Center for Immigration Studies estimates that the legal and illegal immigrant population of the U.S. will make up nearly 15 percent of the entire U.S. population.
Mass immigration has come at the expense of America’s working and middle class, which has suffered from poor job growth, stagnant wages, and increased public costs to offset the importation of millions of low-skilled foreign nationals.

John Binder is a reporter for Breitbart News. Follow him on Twitter at @JxhnBinder.

 


 
Follow on Twitter    Friend on Facebook    Forward to Friend 
ROBIN HVIDSTON
We The People Rising
http://wethepeoplerising.wordpress.com/
Action Alert

Our mailing address is:
WE THE PEOPLE CALIFORNIAS CRUSADER
915 W. Foothill Blvd, #321
ClaremontCA 91711

Monday, September 4, 2017

Counter-Protest in LA! President Trump, #RepealDACA Now!

Folks!

We need to step up and push against this perverse disregard for our nation's immigration laws.

The arrogant left-wing hate groups all over California are putting the demands of illegal aliens and their enablers ahead of American citizens.

This is wrong, and we just cannot allow this to happen!

Please email me or text me through Facebook if you are able to attend and counter protest this DACA kaka!

Enough is enough!

Our federal government must put the needs of Americans First, and stop pandering to illegal aliens and the open borders-amnesty lobby. The media--the world!--needs to know that 4.5 million Californians voted for Donald Trump, and they do not support the scuttling and undermining of our nation's immigration laws!



Please contact me if you can attend to counter-protest! Tell President Trump: Repeal DACA Now!

Arthur Schaper, LA County for Trump
arthurschaper@hotmail.com

Arthur--


You probably heard the rumors about DACA ending - which would drastically change the lives of over 800,000 immigrant youth in this country. DACA is still in place until an official announcement is made, which we expect to happen tomorrow, Tuesday, September 5th.

That’s why now more than ever we need to be ready to take action across the country to show Trump and this administration that we won’t let this happen without a serious fight. Can I count on you to come out TOMORROW September 5th to protect DACA and immigrant youth like me?


Rise Up 4 DACA Los Angeles
10:00 AM
Roybal Federal Building
255 E. Temple Street
Los Angeles, CA 90012
RSVP


Have DACA? Learn more about what is happening and how to take care of yourself during this moment.


White supremacists have long been plotting a way to deport more and more people, and one of their ways is to end DACA. Together we can send the message that people of consciousness are the majority and that we'll defend immigrants from their agenda. Together we can heal our communities by coming out this Tuesday.

Will I see you out there?

Let’s send a loud and bold message to Trump and White Supremacists tomorrow: DACA and immigrants are #HereToStay!

See you in the streets,
Adrian and the rest of team at United We Dream

PS:  We will hold a community call on Tuesday, September 5th at 9pm ET in English. Text DACACall to 877- 877 right now to RSVP. Once it’s time for the community call, we’ll call your phone and connect you into the national community call. It’s free to participate and we’ll have experts answer your questions live.  

Friday, January 27, 2017

DACA Is Complex--Because of Obama's Lawlessness

Deferred Action on Childhood Arrivals should live up to its name.

President Obama deferred the action to deport, remove illegal aliens who had arrived in this country when they were young. Now it's time to enforce the action.



The truth is--this DACA revocation is not complex. It's actually a pretty simple concept.

People who are in this country illegally need to leave the country, get back in line and follow the legal process to become citizens in our great country

We can complain--and perhaps rightly so--that the process to become a citizen is cumbersome and unfair. But millions of people have come to this country legally and joined our great nation as legal residents.

So, right way I have no compassion for lawlessness.

This country's compassion has been stretched to its limits. It's time for our elected officials to stop being guilt-tripped into throwing out the welcome out to everyone who comes to our borders claiming asylum or refugee status.

And you know what else? It's not the fault of the citizens in this country if illegal aliens took their children into this country and put them in this tight position.

The most compassionate action we can take is to enforce our laws.

Simple as that.

So, let's see what the liberal media choose to do ...

They turn up the perverse sympathy card. They induce readers to feel sad and even ashamed that they want the rule of law respected and our statutes enforced. Or the press will give the impression that enforcing our laws is too difficult, and will create too many problems for us.

From The Daily Breeze:

Trump faces a complex choice on DACA

It's not a complex choice, as much as the previous administrations have refused to enforce our laws. This conflict is not hard to understand. What is lacking is the political will to do what is right for the American people.

Donald Trump signed executive orders this week that might deliver two of his biggest campaign promises — to build a border wall and to make it considerably tougher to be an undocumented resident of the United States.

Donald Trump has followed through on more promises made--in two weeks time, then any politician before him. This is incredible!

But a third campaign promise — to repeal the Deferred Action for Childhood Arrivals program (DACA), and start the deportation process of about 750,000 people who grew up in the United States after being brought here as children -- remains unfilled.

Yes, and I submit that this is a big problem. We need to undo this unconstitutional program, no looking back. Donald Trump can declare to the world that he is compassionate. Elected officials are not permitted to spend our money for their compassion.

I share the same thing

For thousands of people in Southern California, that non-move by Trump is a moment of personal anxiety, a potentially life-changing shoe that has yet to drop.

For Trump, it’s a moment of political anxiety.

Before the election, DACA was as big a part of his campaign as the border wall. In speech after speech Trump railed against the program, saying he would “terminate” it immediately, even in the face of political blowback. Polling shows his core supporters responded to that message, seeing the promise as a sign that Trump was immune to typical political pressures.

But since the election, Trump’s language on DACA has softened.

I have spoken to Trump supporters and staffers in the Trump administration. The reason that he is not pulling the lever right now on DACA is that he wants the entire cabinet assembled.

OK.

But we need him to pull the lever soon. There should be no more applications processed. Time to pull the plug on that perverse program.

In his first TV interview as president elect he suggested he would replace DACA with something that would allow younger immigrants to stay in the United States. And on Wednesday, hours after he signed the executive orders to start construction of the border wall and to beef up border agents and immigration personnel, Trump told ABC news that DACA recipients “shouldn’t be worried.”

At this point, I stopped paying to what Trump says, and more attention to what he does. And Trump is doing a great job already.

Still, many are.

“There is just chaos and hysteria going on with our undocumented community,” said Luz Gallegos, community programs director for the TODEC Legal Center, which provides immigration services in the Inland Empire.

The word "undocumented" is the weasel word of the year. Give me a break. Human beings are not pieces of paper. They are human beings. And human beings can be illegal.

Like many immigrant advocacy groups in the region, the center continues to help immigrants already in the program to renew their status with DACA, which offers relief from deportation in two-year windows. But Gallegos said her group also is advising people not to submit initial applications for the program, keeping their personal information -- and the fact that they’re not documented immigrants -- out of government databases.

“It’s been really emotional. We don’t know what’s going to happen two days from now, two hours from now. It’s a roller-coaster” Gallegos said, choking up.



“There’s really no end to it with this administration.”

All of this chaos and upset is President Obama's fault. If he had any principles, if he really cared about fixing the immigration problem the way that he intended to, then Obama should have done something about the issue during the first two years of his Administration.

And Obama did nothing:




What is known is that DACA is popular.

As of now, DACA, created five years ago as an executive order by Barack Obama, covers about 750,000 people, about half of whom live in California. Most work or study here; virtually all speak English and are culturally assimilated.

How do they know that DACA is powerful? Who is telling them this?

Other sources have outlined that they do not know how many illegal aliens are in the country. But of course, notice that nearly half of these zombie migrants are in California (supposedly). 

Often, DACA recipients — touted as DREAMers by supporters and in the media — are the public faces of the immigration debate.

Notice the passage writes "by supporters and in the media." Let's make this plain. The media are supporters of these DREAMers, while ignoring the American Dreamers, the citizens who were born in this country and are finding it more difficult to find work and excel in their careers.

A poll released in late November by Global Strategy found that 58 percent of all voters supported keeping DACA in place, and just 28 percent wanted it to be repealed.

Which voters? Guess what ... I don't care if 90% of the people favor this DACA crap. It needs to be repealed. The rule of law is not based on popular sentiment. That's how Obama had governed for the last eight years. We need leadership, not feelings.

For Trump — supposedly immune to polling — a choice to cut the program could reduce his political capital.

No it wouldn't. What a crock.

“The politics of it get very dicey,“ said Mike Madrid, a California-based Republican strategist who has studied Latino voting trends. For most voters, he said, “going after DREAMERs would be one step too far.”

He is not going after "DREAMers." He is ending the ruthless lawlessness of the Obama Administration and their chronic disregard of We the People, the ones who form a more perfect union and who expect our elected officials to honor their oaths and uphold the rule of law.

“This is absolutely a lightning rod. DACA has personalized the [immigration] issue in a way that nothing else has, It puts a human face to it, and in a social movement, that can change everything.”

Given the political delicacy of the issue, Madrid said, it’s possible that Trump could choose to quietly phase out the program, rather than make a big repeal announcement.

“I think that might be as far as they’re willing to go, politically.”

But Trump is already facing pressure from anti-illegal immigration groups, who fear the president‘s hesitancy to repeal DACA signals a broader softening on his hawkish immigration policy agenda.

“We’re very disappointed,” said Joe Guzzardi, national media director at Californians for Population Stabilization, a Santa Barbara-based group that advocates immigration restrictions.

“He said early and often that he was going to repeal Obama’s executive orders on immigration, and DACA was on that list.”

I agre with Guzzardi. Trump needs to kick rump and repeal that immoral program.

In an email blast sent earlier this week, the North Carolina-based Americans for Legal Immigration PAC urged its 50,000 supporters to tell the White House to reopen its comments hotline so they could push the president to act on DACA.

“He risks alienating the very powerful base that elected him if he doesn’t act soon,“ said William Gheen, the group’s president. “We’ve given Republicans all of the branches of government, and we don’t want to see them support DACA by any means.”

Trump didn’t look at polling when he moved to build the wall. Only about 37 percent of Americans want a border wall; 59 percent oppose it. And, broadly speaking, most Americans -- 61 percent -- favor a path to citizenship for immigrants.

Other Republicans are moving away from Trump on immigration.

Earlier this month, a bipartisan group of senators, including Republicans Lindsay Graham of South Carolina and Lisa Murkowski of Alaska, introduced legislation to give deportation relief to as many as 740,000 undocumented immigrants brought to the U.S. as children.

Lisa Murkowski is a total RINO, and how she came out of Alaska, I will never understand. If she is so concerned about all those illegal minors, she should pay for them to live in Alaska.

“It’s my firm belief most Americans want to fix a broken immigration system in a humane manner,” Graham said in a press release.

Graham's belief is all wrong, and our system is not broken. The powers that be are refusing to enforce our laws. This discussion continues to go around in circles. Pro-enforcement activists and advocates have done everything they can

In a statement on Trump’s executive orders Wednesday, California Senator Dianne Feinstein took the president to task for not addressing DACA, calling it “the most important issue at hand.”

Feinstein was one of the biggest cheerleaders for amnesty. If there were more commonsense voters in the state of California, they would be taking her to task, then throwing her out of office, Of course California has lost its commonsense base, or Republican voters are just not voting anymore, as they have gotten tired of being lied to or disappointed by Republican candidates, who get elected and then fail to stand their ground on principles which are best for our country.

“It’s a successful program that I think the president should leave alone,“ Feinstein said. “Homeland Security Secretary John Kelly said DACA youth wouldn’t be a priority and I hope he follows through on that.”



Youth cannot be a priority, to the extent that repeated deportees commit rape and murder. They absolutely must be removed from this country, permanently.

Some of the blowback will undoubtedly come from the DREAMERs themselves.

Since the inception of the program in 2012, reciepients [sic] of the program have become a well-resourced and vocal political interest group, mobilizing undocumented immigrants and presenting a sympathetic face to the immigrant rights movement.

Here's another reason why DACA must be repealed. This group of illegal alien youth who have been sheltered are getting more radicalized by the minute. They do not honor the rule of law in our country,

Check out this video to get a glimpse of what will happen if there is no clear-cut enforcement of our laws:

“I think the real political strength of DREAMERs is that they are telling people who they are,“ said U.S. Congressman Lou Correa, D-Santa Ana, who has been outspoken on immigrant rights issues.

This is a lie. He does not care

“And when you get to hear their stories, how do you say no to them?”

Still, Trump might. His nominee for Attorney General, Ala. Sen. Jeff Sessions, introduced legislation two years ago to end DACA. And a key counselor, Steve Bannon, has publicly denounced the program.

Earlier this week, a draft of an executive order was leaked the Website Vox. That draft called for the elimination of DACA.

Let's hope it goes from leak to deluge, and very soon.

Final Reflection

Let's state the truth in earnest.

Anyone who enters this country is expected to do so legally and to reside in this country legally.

This is not a complex issue.

If parents put their children at risk, that is their fault. They made the situation complicated by breaking the law. It is not an "act of love" (as Jeb said) to violate our immigration laws.

Period.

Every other country in the world enforces its immigration laws. Why can't we?

We have been compassionate to the rest of the world. It's time for our government to put Americans First -- and that means Americans of all ethnic backgrounds who are born and/or naturalized citizens.

This DACA situation is not complicated. The cowardice or craven liberalism of our political class has created this problem. For once, our elected officials should have compassion on this country's citizens.

And that is not a complex request, either.