The DSA Takes Over The Democrat Party

 

For decades, the Democratic Party has exploited but also restrained its more liberal, anti-American activists. However, as they have become outrageously progressive, communistic, and violent, they have lost control of themselves, and now they are taking over.

Democratic Party operatives thought they could maintain control, and for a while, they succeeded. The efforts of aggressive progressive partisans succeeded in taking over the DNC in 1972. They promoted progressive George McGovern for President, and the Democratic National Committee embraced some of the most radical left-wing positions.

Thankfully, such communistic madness was duly punished that same year. A relatively popular incumbent, President Richard Nixon, routed the left-wing ideologue and forced the Democrats to regain some sanity if they wanted to win future elections. Nixon listened to the silent majority, restored public order, and brought love of America into the mainstream. 

Democrats needed to tap into that sane sentiment for improved chances of winning in the future. Democratic establishment leaders reasserted control shortly afterwards, then nominated a plain-spoken Evangelical Christian governor from Georgia as their 1976 Presidential nominee. They appealed to middle America, providing an ethical alternative to the scandal and incompetence of prior Republican administrations.

However, right after his inauguration, President Jimmy Carter veered to the left, entertaining gay rights, abortion, and enacting the Department of Education as a sop to the teachers' unions. Democrats have spiraled downwards toward socialism ever since, even after President Bill Clinton’s sharp pivot to the right after the Republican Revolution of 1994.

Half a century later, the Democratic radicals, socialists, and outright communists have not just forced their way into the Democratic Party. They are taking over, seizing the levers of power and means of production.

The Democratic Socialists of America have invaded the Democratic Party, and they are not relenting. The Democratic Party has itself to blame. During the 2012 DNC Convention, radical delegates booed God, rejected recognition of Jerusalem as the capital of Israel; DNC Floor Chairman (and at the time Los Angeles Mayor) Antonio Villaraigosa waved off their demands (with Obama’s approval) to save face on national television.

Party leaders didn’t outright reject their demands. They just ignored them long enough to secure Obama’s reelection.

State Democratic parties have witnessed this socialist takeover. The grassroots demand single-payer healthcare, abolition of the Second Amendment, radical abortion and LGBT rights, and a host of demands punishing free enterprise while claiming to care for the needs of the so-called working classes instead of millionaires and billionaires.

This rising generation of Democratic socialists in the DNC, committed to their secular vision, has not budged from their worldview, and won’t be silenced: No God, No Israel, and No America. They want socialism at all costs, including the careers of their leaders.

The New York City Democratic primaries on June 23, 2026, prove it.

Commie nepo baby Zohran Mamdani has captured the New York City apparatus, having beaten the incumbent Democratic mayor Eric Adams in the primary, and then Democrat-turned-Independent former governor Andrew Cuomo.  With unprecedented power, Mamdani is energizing disaffected Democratic grassroots activists across the country. They are disgusted with the massive Democratic Party failures of 2024, and they will not relent in their demands for hard-core progressive, anti-Israel candidates going forward.

With Mamdani leading a new, socialist insurgency after a contentious primary, he revealed his political process and acumen, and scared the political establishment into his camp. Mamdani harnessed endorsements from the Democratic establishment, including Governor Kathy Hochul and Congressional leaders like House Minority Leader Hakeen Jeffries, Jerry Nadler, Nydia Velázquez, and even Adriano Espaillat

These lawmakers thought they were saving their jobs. In reality, the new socialist mayor was plotting their demise and that of other incumbent Democrats.

Nadler retired, sensing blood in the water: his own. Nydia Velázquez, the first Latina appointed to the New York City Council and the first Puerto Rican woman elected to Congress, abandoned her re-election bid, as well. Why? She has a progressive wishlist that many could only dream of! She was too “pro-Israel” for the socialist uprising.

Hold-out Espaillat ran again, banking on residual goodwill from hizzoner. Mamdani didn’t return the favor and endorsed radical challenger Darializa Avila Chevalier, who defeated him. Espaillat was a progressive’s progressive. He entered the country illegally as a youth—a major plus for Democrats. He entered Congress with broad support from progressive coalitions across New York City. He voted Way Left on everything, but Mamdani also saw him as too close to Israel.

Zohran endorsed Former City Comptroller Brad Lander, who defeated arch-progressive and Trump nemesis Dan Goldman. The incumbent had big support from pro-Israel groups. Lander repeatedly defamed the Jewish State as a genocidal regime—and won. Another Zohran-backed radical, Assemblywoman Claire Valdez, defeated an established Brooklyn borough President to replace Velázquez

The anti-Zionist (read, Anti-Semitic) agenda is just the tip of the communist iceberg for these candidates. Mamdani and Crew want abolition of law enforcement, a free Palestine (including for the terrorists), and government control of the means of production. They are communists through and through, running under the anti-Israel banner to bring more support into their camp.

Democratic strategist James Carville sounded the alarm on Mamdani’s cancerous infiltration last year, warning that the Democratic Party was looking at a serious rift. He doesn't recognize, however, that his party’s support for Biden’s aggressive expansion of the government, plus Kamala Harris's card-carrying cultural Marxism, all but validated the wily socialist fringes. The socialists endured defeat in 2024, but their cause did not die out. Carville has to live with it, whether he likes it or not.

The rabid rabble of young socialists wants the communist Revolution, and they want it now. They want government-controlled health care, they want climate alarmism as the main stratagem for government policy, and they want rights and privileges for all of the aggrieved minorities, at the expense of Western civilization and the white man. 

Why the hatred of Israel, though? Because the very existence of the Jewish state is anathema to their vision of a perfect world with no borders, no nations, and no identity outside of the proletariat. 

Democrats created this mess, and they now quake in its wake. They told the little children that they could become princes and work only 4 hours a day and philosophize the rest of the week, and now those princes are calling the shots—and kicking out their elders.

Initially, I felt that allowing the Democrats to implode under the tyranny of the Democratic Socialists of America they created would be a boon for the country. Republicans can tie every Democrat to the crazies in New York City.

However, these manic minions can expand their power and ruin everything, not just their deeply blue Democratic ghettoes. Communists don't play by the rules, they don't care about elections, and they certainly don't care about our Constitution.

Look what the communists did to Cuba, and look how they got there! Look what they did to Venezuela, and they got there through elections!

Democrats didn’t stop them from taking over their party. We can and must stop them from taking over entire state governments and then the country. We can, but we have to fight. We cannot allow communism to grow unchecked.

Letter to the Editor: Disappointed with Mamdani Article

Response to Let Commie Mamdani Take New York City

Dear Mr Schaper-

I was disappointed in the content of the article for a number of reasons.

While I understand the animus that many feel towards NYC and its bizarre politics and politicians, I have to say that you miss the big picture on several levels.

First- anyone- Conservative, Republican, or center, should recognize that Communism is evil. Writing off people to live under its horror is not something that decent and right minded people should do.

Second- NYC is a huge city. For all the blue nonsense, it has a robust Republican community. My neighborhood has a GOP club. The NY State Conservative Party is headquartered not in the suburbs or rural upstate, but in Bay Ridge, Brooklyn. 

Despite blatant gerrymandering, Bay Ridge, the area where I grew up, still manages to have a GOP Congresswoman (Malliotakis). Where I currently live in Queens, we have a GOP rep on City Council (Joanne Ariola) . Other parts of Brooklyn and parts of Queens also keep the fight alive (e.g. Vickie Palladino from north Queens). 

Third- the idea that we should "write off NYC so that the madness of the DSA can be brought to light" and/or "use it as an advantage to the Republican cause" is a dangerous gamble. Political winds change. There are people in America who would willingly and or unwittingly accept anything, so long as it sticks it to the President.

I would rather you had written: "I hope that NY comes to its senses. The GOP should find better candidates than Sliwa. As odious as Cuomo is, he's better than a Islamo-Socialist". 

Sincerely

-Bart Daudelin

----------------------------

Mr. Daudelin:

Thank you for reading, and thank you for writing to me.

The fact is that many New Yorkers themselves are writing off New York City in choosing to elect a communist. That is not my fault. That is their choice.

At some point, the people have to suffer the consequences for their choices.

To quote H. L. Mencken: "Democracy is the theory that the common people know what they want, and deserve to get it good and hard."

I understand the concern that more people may jump on the socialist bandwagon, but that is their fall-out.

As for the Republicans in New York City, I am grateful that they are putting up a fight, but I am disappointed that so many of them don't want to support Curt Sliwa, and some Republican groups are calling on Sliwa to drop out! Sounds like a bunch of RINOs to me, which helps explain New York City's descent into communistic collapse.

https://townhall.com/columnists/arthurschaper/2025/08/10/new-york-city-vote-for-sliwa-but-prepare-for-the-worst-n2661633

Andrew Cuomo is running as a vanity project to remake his image after his tyrannical failure as governor. Remember that it was Cuomo who said conservatives had no place in New York to begin with! 

https://aschaper1.blogspot.com/2014/01/ny-gov-cuomo-cast-out-conservatives.html

Cuomo should not be anywhere near power. Trump Derangement Syndrome has afflicted the mass of NYC voters, who will vote for a Commie out of spite. That's a shame, but I stand by statement: let them have it.

Thanks again for writing.

Sincerely,

Arthur Christopher Schaper

Remember, Oh Remember: 9-11, Twenty Years Later

"Remember O Remember"

I spent last week like many of you watching and hearing stories about what happened 20 years ago on 9/11.

I’d like to share two things I saw and pose a question about it?

The first thing that made an impression on me was a street interview asking college-aged young people what they knew about 9/11. I was shocked and saddened to see how little they seemed to know, but even worse how little they seemed to care. It was not something they experienced first-hand so it joined the ranks of those things labeled as “history” which so often seem far-removed in importance in the minds and lives of young people. I understand that if I was just stopped on the street for an interview I may not come across as very articulate or knowledgeable either, so I need to give them some slack for that, but I was disappointed in their detached demeanor and apparent lack of interest on the subject.

Now contrast this to a piece I saw covering the bravery and heroism in the lives of the 13 young servicemen and women who lost their lives in the blast in Afghanistan. These young people were about the same age as the students interviewed. These were stories of self-sacrifice and courage of young people who were in the middle of doing their duty and thinking of others up until their last moments on earth. What made them care that much? What made them believe in something worth fighting for and giving their lives for? What made the difference in these two groups of young people?

For months now I have been posting about education and how important are the messages we communicate to the impressionable and precious young minds that are placed in our care. Why is it so important for them to not only remember something they may not have been alive for like 9/11, but to also learn to feel the significance of these events as well? One of the reasons is because if we fail to teach the next generation these things then not only will the memory of what happened be lost, but all the lessons we learned from that event will also be gone forever.

David and I visited New York City not too long after the towers were hit. I remember the cab driver telling us that there was a sense of love and unity throughout the city that he had never experienced before. There was a humility and kindness that brought everyone together.

I heard an interview by a person last week describing the brave first responders helping to carry people out of the burning building say, “Believe me those people being carried out wouldn’t’ have given a fig what pronouns that person who was carrying them out used or what political party they belonged to.” That statement really hit me.

There are so many things causing division between us right now. I pray it won’t take a tragedy to get us in touch with the things that really matter to all of us – the things that unite us rather than divide us. I also saw interviews of some people who decided to go into search and rescue and law enforcement after they witnessed the bravery of so many in their willingness to run into the burning building when everyone else was running out.

I want my grandchildren to glimpse some of that unity we felt after 9/11. I want them to know that not only are there people so full of hate they will give their lives to hurt others, but there are also people who are so full of love that they will give their lives to save others. I want their education to inform them of those things that bind us all together rather than trying to split us apart.

This kind of education cannot occur if we choose to keep them focused on victimization and division. That is why I have written so consistently and passionately against the ideologies I see being pushed in our schools that seek to separate us and instill in our children the lens of fear and division rather than unity and love.

Since 9/11 there have been factions pushing the message sown in the Sixties that American is evil and that America deserved to be attacked. Are we a perfect nation? Of course not. But if our young people are not given a glimpse of all the good and wonderful things that inform who we are and are striving to be then they will not see anything in it worth holding onto or preserving. They need to study and learn about the Constitution and how inspired of a document it truly is.

In that street interview several students said that they didn’t think it was a good idea to spread the idea of American exceptionalism. They said it isn’t good for us to think we are better than other nations. I don’t know about you, but I never thought that was the definition of American exceptionalism. Our young people need to know the reason that America is exceptional is because it is founded on exceptional principles inspired by God and predicated on righteous ideals dedicated to liberty and justice for all. These are principles that can be shared no matter what faith we believe in or not. If our young people don’t understand or remember this, then they will not think America is worth defending and what will happen then?

One of the powerful messages of the Book of Mormon is the admonition to remember. We learn so vividly in its pages what happens when we forget our reliance and dependence on God. The pride cycle is one of the great warnings of this sacred text. It is repeated over and over in so much of this record that we cannot escape that its message is for us. When the people were successful, they became prideful and forgot God. This pride led to them to being attacked by their enemies. With the attacks they became fearful and humbled and looked once again to God for their strength and thus they prospered again. After they prospered, they became prideful again and forgot God and the cycle continued. Here’s a poem I came across that relates to this cycle as well.

Hard times create strong men

Strong men create good times

Good times create weak men

Weak men create hard times.

I would just add that “strong men and women” are strong because they know their strength comes from God.

  Alexis de Toquerville is credited with saying that “America is great because she is good and if she ever ceases to be good, she will cease to be great.”

We are not perfect, but that doesn’t mean we can’t keep trying to be good. And by good I don’t think it means that we all have to believe in the same things nor in the same way. The founding fathers certainly understood that.  

I think that’s something worth remembering.

I was about to send this when I saw an article in the Wall Street Journal this morning by Peggy Noonan who also reflects on what she has seen happen in the past 20 years since that fateful day. Here is an excerpt from her observations on what has changed. 

“...We cannot help compare the America now with that of 20 years ago, and we see a deterioration. We feel disturbance at this because we don’t know if we can get our way back.The losing of the thread feels bigger than ideology, bigger certainly than par­ties. It feels like some more fundamental confusion, an inability to play the role of who we are, and to be comfortable in who we are.

The country we are experiencing now is one of people in different groups ganging up on each other. We all see this. It’s all division, driven by identity politics, race, gender, class. Twenty years ago we were grateful for cops, now we denigrate them and they leave and we argue about why they left. A rising generation of voters who were children when 9/11 happened and who became conscious of history during the 2008 economic crisis see (and have been well taught!) the imperfections, mistakes and sins of their own country but have no human memory of the abuses of other systems, of how damaging deep social­ism, and communism, have been. The passion of their emerging beliefs will en­gender opposing passions. They already are.

Just about every large business in America is now run by its human resources department because everyone appears to be harassing and assaulting each other or accusing each other. Is this the sign of a healthy country?

Following the trauma and drama of 9/11 we started discovering in some new way our nation’s meaning—what it was in history, meant in history, meant to us. We talked about it. We saw: The first thing the firemen did after the towers fell was put up the flag.

Twenty years in our history is treated as all sin, sin, sin. We’re like mad monks flagellating ourselves. We are going through a non­stop condemnation of our past and our people and their limits and ignorance. It isn’t healthy. Reflection and honest questioning are, but not this. And so much of it comes from our most successful and secure, our elites and establishments. Regular people look and think, “But if our professors and media leaders and tech CEOs hate us, who is going to help us think our way out of this mess?” And they know someone has to, because they know in a way elites can never understand, because they have grown so used to security, that no nation can proceed in the world safely and fruitfully when at bottom it hates itself.

Watching the ceremonies last weekend it was understandable if you thought: We started out rediscovering our love and wound up obsessed with our sins. We started out together and wound up more divided than ever, driven apart by op­portunists who set us at each other’s throats.”

My hope is that we can remember and teach our young people the best in who we are and who we want to be.

Love and Blessings,

Bianca

And may we continue to remember those who are still trapped in Afghanistan.

ICYMI: MassResistance Organization Director on Laura Ingraham Show!

MassResistance Organization Director on Laura Ingraham Show!

Uneasy Start, Sudden Cut-Off Leads to Massive Attention and Support for MassResistance

In previous posst, MassResistance reported on the efforts of our Texas and Houston MassResistance chapters to stop another Drag Queen Story Hour, this time in Leander Texas, a conservative-leaning suburb of Austin, Texas.

When our activists found out that the Leander public library was hosting their own Drag Queen Story Hour, they hammered the Leander, Texas city council. They received an overwhelming number of negative calls and emails demanding that the city cancel their Drag Queen Program. When a local “progressive” church took over the event and agreed to host it privately, more of our pro-family forces assembled to protest and to end the program.

News of MassResistance's efforts against Drag Queen Story Hour program reached national networks, including the Fox News Network, Laura Ingraham specifically. Within a day, she contacted our Waltham, MA main office to invite a spokesman on her program to discuss Drag Queen Story Hour, specifically our opposition to it.

Arthur Schaper, our Organization Director, took up the challenge. He had spoken for MassResistance on other programs, including InfoWars as well as writing for Barbwire, Townhall.com, and other publications.

Arthur relates the rest of the experience below.

The Program

I had never participated in a debate or discussion on national television before, including the Fox News Channel. Even though the new channel touts its reputation as “Fair and Balanced”, our main office had concerns about Arthur’s appearance on the Ingraham Angle with Laura Ingraham.

Ingraham’s brother is openly gay, for example, and there is a growing recognition that the Fox News Network by and large is either pro-gay (one of their news anchors Shep Smith is gay) or simply refuses to discuss and confront the LGBT Agenda on its network programming.

I was prepared for anything. When the producers in Washington DC informed me that this was going to be a debate over Drag Queen Story Hour, I was prepared for a combative clash of ideas.

I arrived at the LA-area news studio about an hour early, which gave him a chance to tour the facilities and take a few photos:

I received few instructions, aside from being told that I needed to focus on Drag Queen Story Hour.

The opposing guest, the man who supports allowing homosexual adult entertainers to read to children, Jonathan Merritt, a pro-gay Christian author.

The “Discussion”

Ingraham began the brief segment with a segue, describing the Drag Queen Story Hour event in Leander, Texas:

INGRAHAM: When Leander, Texas, a city of 56,000, decided to put an end to this, citing upset citizens, a leftwing church known as Open Cathedral stepped in to hosted the event this weekend. So what happens there? Joining me now to debate is Arthur Schaper, director of Mass Resistance, and Jonathan Merritt, a progressive Christian writer and author of the book "Learning to Speak to God from Scratch." All right, Arthur, what is your group's main objection to these drag queen story hours that are popping up all across the country?

Arthur candidly admitted afterwards that he did not watch the Ingraham Angle regularly. Therefore, he had no real idea how the debate format works on her program. He was combative from the outset:

ARTHUR SCHAPER, DIRECTOR, MASSRESISTANCE: Thank you again, Laura, for having me on the show. My name is Arthur Schaper. I'm the organization director for Mass Resistance. We are the international pro-family group that makes the difference. We have had parents contacting us all over the country about these perverse programs. The bottom line is this. You have adult homosexual men, adult entertainers going into a public library reading to children. That alone should not only be setting off alarms, but people should be demanding this to be canceled even before it starts. We're not talking about diversity. We are talking about deviance. We're talking about perverse and destructive lifestyles being animated or advertised to children as if it's normal. You can just look at the website itself.

I was clear about the problem with drag queens reading to children—adult entertainment is not acceptable around young people. Period. I was not content with focusing exclusively on that issue, but wanted to bring out the fact that this was a subversive means of normalizing LGBT behaviors and ideas.

Ingraham took offense when I mentioned “adult homosexual men”, and stated:

INGRAHAM: Wait, wait, hold on, Arthur, are you saying that gay people can't read to kids ever? We're talking about a very specific issue with drag queens. That's what we're talking about here, so try to keep it focused on that issue.

With all due respect to Ingraham, I had done exactly that, and so I continued:

SCHAPER: We're talking about drag entertainment here, drag entertainment. This is adult illicit entertainment, to put it mildly. And we are having these entertainers reading to children? Why stop there? why not have poll [sic] dancer story hour? How about having porn actor story hour. This is just nonsensical.

In the next brief segment, Ingraham asked the progressive Christian author to justify allowing drag queens to read the children. I admit that I intermittently criticized his remarks, and Laura had to ask me to wait my turn. Looking back on this part of the “debate”, I recognized that there really was no need for me to interject remarks. Mr. Meritt’s attempts to justify Drag Queen Story Hour lacked “merit”, to say the least. His defenses of the program were weak and laughable.

Then Laura allowed me to wrap up this very brief segment:

INGRAHAM: Arthur, close it out quickly.

SCHAPER: There are normal ways to do this. We are not talking about knitting. We're not talking about a Bible class. We're talking about degenerate, perverse entertainment. And not only that, not one but two sex offenders were exposed at one drag queen story hour in Houston, Texas. That is what our organization revealed. Mass Resistance, I'm with the California chapter. If you want real reading –

Arthur holds up copy of MassResistance book

“The Health Hazards of Homosexuality”

At that point, I brought up a copy of MassResistance’s famous, controversial tell-all book exposing the full extent of the health and societal problems with LGBT behaviors. I had intended to segue from the book to stating that this is the kind of reading that needed to take place in libraries. But Laura cut me off and refused to let me continue.

INGRAHAM: Don't hold up props. Here's one thing I don't like on this show, when people bring props. OK?

This criticism was unexpected for me. No one in the Los Angeles office had told Arthur that he could not have an item to bring up and show the audience. Also, it seemed strange that Laura took exception to my bringing up MassResistance’s key book exposing the LGBT Agenda and the dangers associated with those behaviors, but earlier in the segment she had promoted her other guest’s book. Why the double standard?

SCHAPER: This is what people should be reading to understand at length what's going on with this whole agenda.

In this last segment, the public got a better glimpse as to what was Laura Ingraham’s thought process about the segment:

INGRAHAM: OK, I got it, I got it. This is not a segment or promote one particular a group. We are trying to figure out what is really going on here. People have legitimate concerns on both sides of this issue. What is the point of doing this with kids? Is there a point? That's what we are trying to find out tonight. We wanted to have a really good conversation. We appreciate it.

For me, the statement that really troubled me from Laura Ingraham was ‘People have legitimate concerns on both sides of this issue.’ What?! There is no legitimate defense to allow drag queens, adult entertainers, in a public library to indoctrinate children to embrace destructive behaviors, lifestyles, and ideas!

Frankly, can there be any legitimate defense to allow illicit, sexually explicit adult entertainers into a library to read to children?

 (For the full transcript of the discussion about Drag Queen Story Hour on the Fox News Channel, click here. For the full video, click here.)

Response: Massive Support and The Overwhelming, Left-Wing Backlash

After the recording, the MassResistance main office shared concerns with Arthur about his performance on the program. Arthur conceded that he didn’t get to share many of the crucial points which the public needed to hear about the underlying agenda connected with Drag Queen Story Hour. He also recognized the fact that he interrupted the other guest. However, many people across the country watching the interview (and who followed Arthur’s YouTube Live feed afterwards) appreciated what Arthur did.

A number of viewers were grateful that Arthur spoke out against the LGBT Agenda forcefully and without reserve. They actually liked that he was not afraid to make the case with the title of the book “The Health Hazards of Homosexuality.”

Many supporters were quite critical of Laura Ingraham, in fact, instead of Arthur. Reviewing the interview, it seemed that Ingraham was only committed to giving that part of the program five minutes tops, hardly enough time for a robust discussion on a contentious issue. Viewers were also very critical that she cut Arthur off just as he was talking about the two sex offenders who were participating in the Houston, Texas Drag Queen Story Hour earlier this year. Many others also said that Ingraham has a long-standing habit of interrupting her guests, not allowing them to finish their comments.

One MassResistance activist in San Diego, California even suggested that Laura was caught off guard. She realized in the midst of the broadcast that she was ill-prepared to discuss the whole drag queen story hour phenomenon, and her lack of preparation frustrated her.

The positive comments have been coming in every since. Of course, having Arthur mention and speak up for MassResistance on national television is a big victory for our pro-family fight!

As expected, the backlash from the left-wing, pro-LGBT press was immediate. But their vehemence about Arthur stating the obvious—that homosexuality is hazard to one’s health—brought out even more vitriol from the left-wing media “watchdogs”!

Mediaite: Laura Ingrham Interviews Anti-Gay Activist, Shuts Down Segment After He Touts “Health Hazards of Homosexuality”

Media Matters for America: Laura Ingraham hosts extreme anti-LGBTQ guest who promotes book The Health Hazards of Homosexuality

Deadline: Fox News: Laura Ingraham’s ‘The Ingraham Angle’ Draws Scrutiny For Anti-Gay Guests

Raw Story: Fox News segment goes off the rails as anti-gay hate group head promotes ‘Health Hazards of Homosexuality’ book on-air

Even more conservative leaning reports on Arthur’s appearance were not exactly charitable:

Washington Examiner: Ingraham cuts off anti-gay guest after he promotes The Health Hazards of Homosexuality

One part of the report suggested that the writer was more sympathetic to Arthur:

"All right, I got it," Ingraham said, rolling her eyes and cutting off both guests as it became apparent Schaper was not going to put down his book [italics added].

Ingraham brought on the guests to discuss whether or not "Drag Queen Story Hour" which was being held in various libraries and bookshops in Texas was a good thing.

Instinct Magazine: Laura Ingraham Invited Homophobe to Speak on Her Show

Patheos: FOX News Host Ends Segment After Christian Bigot Promotes His Book of Bigotry

The New Civil Rights Movement: Fox News Segment Goes Off the Rails as Anti-Gay Hate Group Head Promotes ‘Health Hazards of Homosexuality’ Book On-Air

AlterNet: Fox news segment goes off the rails as anti-gay hate group head promotes ‘health hazards of homosexuality’ book on-air

Pink News: Fox News guest waves book about ‘health hazards of homosexuality’

Right Wing Watch: Laura Ingraham Continues Pride Month Promotion of Anti-LGBTQ Bigotry

In an epic first, major newspaper the New York Daily News featured an article slamming MassResistance following Arthur’s appearance on the Ingraham Angle:

New York Daily News: Media watch groups are sounding the alarm on Laura Ingraham’s anti-LGBTQ guests: ‘We’re talking about perverse and destructive lifestyles'

More people have been requesting copies of “The Health Hazards of Homosexuality” since that show, as well.

Twitter had some interesting comments, too, the usual left-wing LGBT pablum:

So about last night.... Here is me on @IngrahamAngle with a man who is living, breathing evidence that time travel is real - https://t.co/d523kQS3My

— Jonathan Merritt (@JonathanMerritt) June 14, 2019

Arthur Schaper went on TV tonight to spread FEAR. He may well know people have no choice over being queer, but he wants them to be AFRAID to acknowledge it. He wants to encourage rejection and encourage discrimination. He does not value the lives of queer kids.

— Zack Ford (@ZackFord) June 14, 2019

This tweet was unique, in that the post reported what Arthur said and did accurately!

Laura Ingraham hosts extreme anti-LGBTQ guest who promotes book The Health Hazards of Homosexuality

MassResistance's Arthur Schaper also compared "Drag Queen Story Hour" to "porn actor story hour"

via @ohhkaygohttps://t.co/yPiOy0WL7j

— jordan (@JordanUhl) June 14, 2019

Arthur’s appearance on the Laura Ingraham was a huge victory for MassResistance. Our efforts are expanding all over the country—and the world—and the press, both conservative as well as liberal—is starting to notice.

Two weeks ago, Arthur had published an article faulting the more conservative media for not taking a firm stance to report accurately and criticize the LGBT Agenda. His appearance on the Ingraham Angle gave him the opportunity he and the rest of the MassResistance team had long hoped for to get this debate about limiting and delegitimizing the LGBT Agenda in the larger culture and society as a whole.

MassResistance is not only making the difference, but is forcing the larger mainstream media culture to pay attention. The regressive left—the media, the institutions, and the activist groups—are getting worried as they realize that our direct, confrontational approach against the LGBT is working, changing minds and saving lives.

ICYMI Photos from Trump Tower, New York Ci

I wanted to make sure that everyone who has been following me and supporting what I do saw these photos.

They are from the August 6th event in New York City, when I spoke on the CNN panel about my views on President Trump two years into his election. Two other people with me still support the President along with me.

One of the panelists voted for Trump, but has come to strongly oppose him at this point. Still, he and I became friends and talked about many issues. He even helped me get to the Trump Tower about fifteen minutes away from the CNN headquarters in New York City.

Check out the photos that I took on scene and within the building!