CA State Senator Condemns SB 54, Now Signed Into Law

FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE                         Contact: John Seiler: 714-662-6050 Thursday, October 5, 2017                             john.seiler@sen.ca.gov California Sen. John Moorlach on Gov. Jerry Brown signing Senate Bill 54: Secession seems to be in the air. On Sunday, 90 percent of Catalonia voters chose to secede from Spain. Last June, California Attorney General Xavier Becerra authorized signature gathering to put a California Secession initiative on the Nov. 2018 ballot. So it’s not surprising that today Gov. Jerry Brown signed into law Senate Bill 54, which effectively declares California has seceded from the United States on major parts of immigration-law enforcement. In a statement, the governor explained his signature, “This bill states that local authorities will not ask about immigration status during routine interactions. It also bans unconstitutional detainer requests and prohibits the commandeering of local officials to do the work of immigration agents,” meaning federal officers of the Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) agency. He did claim the bill “does not prevent or prohibit” ICE or “the Department of Homeland Security from doing their own work in any way. They are free to use their own considerable resources to enforce federal immigration law in California.” Yet Orange County Sheriff Sandra Hutchens said, “This law is inconsistent with widely accepted best practices of open communication amongst all levels of law enforcement.” Although she did note “not all cooperation is restricted.” I warned about this on the Senate floor back in April when, based on my eight years as an Orange County Supervisor, I noted, “I come out of Countyland, and we have assistance agreements. Our police departments in Orange County – we have 34 cities – they have mutual aid agreements. They work together. They respect their city borders, but they work together to apprehend the bad guys. So to unilaterally discontinue such a longstanding reciprocal understanding with the federal government, is disturbing. It’s disturbing to our constituents. So no wonder the California State Sheriffs Association is opposed. “Why do we want to engage the federal government in yet another funding battle. California has a very precarious budget. It has major unfunded liabilities. It has major retiree medical expenses. It has severe infrastructure concerns. We just don’t need to jeopardize a funding source from the federal government for a state that is really having some fiscal concerns and is going to be asking our residents to step up to the bar for another tax increase.” It’s also worth remembering that Article 3, Section 1 of the California Constitution stipulates, “The State of California is an inseparable part of the United States of America, and the United States Constitution is the supreme law of the land.” SB 54 is another example of showmanship by the majority party. Let’s hope they learn the art of leadership soon. If you would like to request an interview with Senator John Moorlach, please contact John Seiler at john.seiler@sen.ca.gov or 714-662-6050.

Moorlach: Congress Protects Californians from More Insecure Pension Schemes

State Senator John Moorlach (R-Costa Mesa) just announced more good news to California residents.

Even though the California State Legislature, under Democratic Dominance once again, is doing everything they can to push their regressive, leftist agenda, Congress remains firmly in Republican control.

They can pass legislation and undo President Obama's damage with bills and signatures. Now that's what I call using a pen and a phone for good.

Last year, Governor Brown signed off on AB 1234, which empowered the state of Caliornia to begin divering money from every single California's paycheck to create pension accounts for them. This scheme was advertised as a means for ensuring that private as well as public sector employees would have a secure retirement.

Check out Moorlach's press release:

Today, the United States Senate approved House Resolution 66 by Rep. Tim Walberg of Michigan that overturns a disastrous rule from the Department of Labor during the Obama Administration. Congress listened to the people, unpleased by the previous Administration’s rule by fiat. With the understanding that President Donald Trump will sign the bill, this is likely to nullify California’s Secure Choice program passed last year in the state legislature over my objections. 

What was the "Secure CHoices" program?

Really quickly, this program was implemented in order for the state of California to provide automatic pensions for every Californian.

Reminder: California's pension liabilities are astronomical. They are not even providing for the government employees.

Does anyone really want to trust the state of California to fund and provide pensions for every Californian in the private sector?

No way.

As I have said repeatedly, the Secure Choice Act is a noble effort, but it is neither “secure” nor a “choice.” Requiring employers to withhold contributions from their workers’ paychecks and send the funds to Sacramento to be invested on their behalf is highly inadvisable. In money management, there is rarely a scheme that has minimal costs and limited risk. The lack of proper oversight for the Secure Choice program, as well as considering the massive costs potentially passed along to taxpayers, is concerning.

The state legislature already takes too much of our money.

Way too much, and the state legislature with Brown's signature just signed off on the largest gas tax increase in the state's history. The last institution I would want to manage my retirement would be the state of California.

Hands off my money, Sac-Town!