We need a wall, a big beautiful wall along the United States' southern border. It's time to stop the spread of drugs and crime, the cartel violence and abject lawlessness of Latin America into our country.
Illegal immigration is hurting everyone. It hurts the law-abiding citizens, the taxpayers, the small business owners, cities and states, and law enforcement officers.
It's time to stop this illegal alien madness.
Of course, in California the Democratic Party, already fraying at the seams over its unseemly behavior against its own grassroots as well as the entire citizenry forced to pay for their dystopian fantasies.
Enough is enough.
Shame on State Senator Ricardo Lara (D-Huntington Park) for pushing legislation to prevent the Southern border wall from being built. These kinds of political shenanigans should have led to a clear-cut recall against this corrupt fraud. How shameful, how base do our elected officials think they can go?
Existing law establishes the border between the United
States and Mexico, which includes the southern border of California.
This bill would make findings and declarations related to a
wall on the border between California and Mexico.
This bill would prohibit the state, commencing January 1,
2018, from awarding or renewing any contract with any person, as defined, that
at the time of bid or proposal for a new contract or renewal of an existing
contract is providing or has provided on or after January 1, 2018, goods or
services to the federal government for the construction of a federally funded
wall, fence, or other barrier along California’s southern. border, as defined.
Existing law defines “responsible bidder” for the purposes
of public works contracts as a bidder who has demonstrated the attribute of
trustworthiness, as well as quality, fitness, capacity, and experience to
satisfactorily perform the public works contract.
This bill would provide that, for purposes of contacts with
the state, the term “responsible bidder” does not include a bidder who, at the
time of the bid or proposal for a new contract or renewal of an existing
contract, is providing or has provided goods or services on or after January 1,
2018, to the federal government for the construction of a federally funded
wall, fence, or other barrier along California’s southern border, as defined.
Here's the call to action, issued by Robin Hvidston of We the People Rising:
Senator Ricardo Lara's bill SB 30 is scheduled for a committee hearing in the CA State Assembly Committee on Accountability and Administrative Review on Wednesday, July 12th. Committee Jurisdiction: Primary jurisdictions are identifying savings and efficiencies in the management of state government, reviewing and studying the implementation, operation, and effectiveness of state programs and agencies. http://aaar.assembly.ca.gov/
This bill would prohibit the state, commencing January 1, 2018, from awarding or renewing contract with any person, as defined, that at the time of bid or proposal for a new contract or renewal of an existing contract is providing or has provided goods or services to the federal government for the construction of a federally funded wall, fence, or other barrier along California’s southern border.
CALL the Assembly Committee on Accountability and Administrative Review at (916) 319-3600 and the CA State Assembly Committee on Accountability and Administrative Review chair, vice chair and committee members, listed below. Let them know thatYOU OPPOSE SB 30, Senator Ricardo Lara's bill to penalize those involved with construction of the border wall in California. SB 30 is scheduled for a Assembly Committee on Accountability and Administrative Review hearing on Wednesday, July 12th.
First,
I wrote the report about what happened to me when I was arrested, detained in a
Huntington Park jail cell, then released.
When I was sitting in the holding cell, I
thought of many important people in the past, whether ancient or modern, who had
ended up in a jail cell because they stood (or sat) for what is right. Civil
disobedience carries initial consequences, but they pay off in the end. The
right side of history, the right side of normalcy, the only side of reality
always wins out:
“The
arc of the moral universe is long, but it bends towards justice.”
Justice is based on the
truth, the rule of law, and a moral imperative which recognizes a loving God
who helps us to navigate a fallen world. This is indeed a fallen world, but
justice is the divine reminder that we do not have to be discouraged or
overwhelmed by the evil in the world:
"For if by one man's offence
death reigned by one; much more they which receive abundance of grace and of
the gift of righteousness shall reign in life by one, Jesus Christ.)"
(Romans 5:17)
and
"Nay,
in all these things we are more than conquerors through him that loved
us." (Romans 8:37)
and
also
"Be not overcome of evil,
but overcome evil with good." (Romans 12:21)
I had to look it over, and I found so much that King had dealt
with resonated with my situation--with our conflict--in Huntington Park, a city
where lawless corrupt elected officials treat the illegal aliens better than
the taxpaying, law-abiding citizens.
The first paragraph is an excellent initiation point:
While confined here in the Birmingham city jail,
I came across your recent statement calling my present activities "unwise
and untimely." Seldom do I pause to answer criticism of my work and ideas.
If I sought to answer all the criticisms that cross my desk, my secretaries
would have little time for anything other than such correspondence in the
course of the day, and I would have no time for constructive work.
I have
faced numerous critics who do not like my brazen protests against corrupt
politicians and my fight against illegal immigration, Obamacare, the attacks on
life and family. One man repeatedly asked me what he thought I was accomplishing
by protesting in town halls and presenting ourselves in the media. He was not
interested in an answer, since he was not interested in the fight to begin
with.
They
have embraced the "moderate" approach. They don't like the noise, the
spectacle, the confrontation. They fear what the media will report about them—and
they are ashamed of what they report about us—about me. “Oh my God! He ended up
in jail! What was he thinking?!” Some of the people I know wondered why I risked
arrest rather than just do what I was told.
My
answer? Rosa Parks. She refused to give up her seat to comply with an unjust
law. She was tired. She worked. She had been paying her taxes. Why should she
have to endure one more inconvenience?
Yes, I
thought of Rosa Parks. She forced the Birmingham, Alabama police to “go there”,
i.e. arrest a person who had paid her fair share to sit on a bus. The outrage
over the police’s legalized cruelty would awaken outrage around the country.
Rev. Bob Owens himself a fighter walking with King and the Southern Baptist
Christian League, shared this powerful revelation with me:
Yes, I
thought of Rosa Parks, but I also think of Martin Luther King.
And now
I consider the disrespectful criticism he endured for his civil disobedience.
The
good news for me, however, is that while MLK had to be arrested 30 times in his
fight for civil rights for blacks, I may only have to endure arrest once for
the restoration of American sovereignty against illegal immigration and illegal
alien invasion.
Here’s
one criticism that King had to contend with while fighting for civil rights in
Birmingham: "Why are you here? You are from Atlanta, Georgia!"
His answer:
I
cannot sit idly by in Atlanta and not be concerned about what happens in
Birmingham. Injustice anywhere is a threat to justice everywhere. Never again
can we afford to live with the narrow, provincial "outside agitator"
idea. Anyone who lives inside the United States can never be considered an
outsider anywhere within its bounds.
I say
"Amen!" to this powerful phrase. I am an American, and therefore I
have a right—and a necessity—to do something about Huntington Park.
I
cannot sit idly by in Torrance, while there is great injustice, great
lawlessness in Huntington Park.
And
there is indeed great injustice in Huntington Park.
Men and
women pay high taxes and fees for a governing class intent on making their
lives rich and at ease. Yet the streets are littered with trash and debris.
Petty crimes are rampant, including lewd conduct, both independent and
interpersonally. Drug use and gang violence are common. The streets and alleys
are decrepit, falling apart even though the city advanced huge amounts of time
and money to refurbish the once glorious Pacific Blvd.
The
city council removed every commissioner from the previous administration. In
their places, the corrupt little children appointed their friends, family
members, political allies ... and two illegal aliens, in brazen disregard of
our immigration laws.
Indeed,
there is great injustice in Huntington Park.
They
overtax and overcharge residents for basic services. The property taxes exceed
legal limits permitted by the state. The ongoing liabilities weighing on the
city's budget priorities exceed any conceivable amount that every resident
could defray if taxed at 100%. They city leaders welcome criminals, illegals,
and all sorts of sordid people to the city. They believe they operate separate
from the rule of law in the state of California or the federal government in
Washington DC. The city employees are not civil servants, but uncivil lords who
think that everything belongs to them, that the property of others belongs to
them.
They are illegals -- aliens!
They
have removed law-abiding citizens from the city council chambers multiple
times, and they have received rebuke from the overseeing distict attorneys in
Downtown Los Angeles. They have allowed their bullying supporters to hector and
disrupt the meeting at will, while calling their political opponents out of
order for no reason.
They
arrested one citizen--me--who had refused to obey an unlawful order, based on
an unjust charge.
Indeed,
there is great injustice in Huntington Park, and We the People Rising have
every right to be here.
Just
like the black civil rights leaders and their supporters, We the People Rising
have attempted to negotiate peacefully with the city council. We attended the
meetings, we voiced our concerns and our outrage, we demanded that they stop
promoting lawlessness and remove the illegal aliens from the commissions.
Of
ourse, they ignored these threats. So we had to go to the next step. King faced
the same harsh reality following the broken promises of white merchants to remove
racist signs and end enforcement of Jim Crow statutes:
As in
so many past experiences, our hopes had been blasted, and the shadow of deep
disappointment settled upon us. We had no alternative except to prepare for
direct action, whereby we would present our very bodies as a means of laying
our case before the conscience of the local and the national community.
Corrupt Alfred "Full Capacity" Martinez
MLK and
Company understood the need to hurt the business community--and by extension,
the municipal government--where it hurts: their pocketbooks, their bank
accounts, and the city budget.
And
that is exactly what we are doing now. As long as the city of Huntington Park
continues to defy our laws and treat citizens like illegal aliens, while
honoring illegal aliens and their enraged sense of entitlement, we will
continue to protect, we will continue to engage and confront the corrupt folly
of the hateful, racist, bigoted city council and activists.
And
yet, the illegal aliens and their widespread enablers in the city complain on
social media "Why do you keep coming? Why won’t you go away? Can't we just
sit down and talk about this? Better yet, why don't you just go back to
wherever you come from?"
MLK
faced similar criticism, and offered this powerful response in his letter:
You may
well ask: "Why direct action? Why sit-ins, marches and so forth? Isn't
negotiation a better path?" You are quite right in calling for
negotiation. Indeed, this is the very purpose of direct action. Nonviolent
direct action seeks to create such a crisis and foster such a tension that a
community which has constantly refused to negotiate is forced to confront the
issue.
Amen to
that. The cities of Huntington Park, Cudahy, and other segregated enclaves have
rejected others who do not look like them. They have embraced a monologue of
diffident, hateful racism, a corrupt lawlessness in which "La Raza"
matters more than the rule of law. Huntington Park wants to go backward, just
like the Solid Democratic South.
We the
People Rising want to move forward.
This
matter of "The Rule of Law" cannot be ignored, the standard in which
everyone must comply, regardless of their age, status, color, or wealth:
An
unjust law is a human law that is not rooted in eternal law and natural law.
Any law that uplifts human personality is just.
Boundaries
are moral. Definitions are true. The argument that men and women should be able
to migrate into other nations, cities, locales without the permission or
approval of the original owners is unjust because it is a modern invention, a
fairy-tale of greedy, distant globalists uninterested the good will of all men.
The
segregation of these "Brown power" cities is massive unjust, because
a city based on fraudulent status or disregard is no city. Where is the
authority to conduct business, to enforce local codes when the city defines
itself by its backward disrespect for the federal laws. To allow a city of
"illegals" to prosper in the midst of established citizenry is essentially
unjust.
This fight is about more
than just a scrawny little city in Southeastern Los Angeles County. The actions
of We the People Rising will not cease until the city rescinds its lawless
sanctuary status ... or goes bankrupt.
The financial bankruptcy
will be the bare minimum needed to expose the moral bankruptcy of a city which
honors lawlessness and condemns the law-abiding. Nothing less than direct
action will make this work, and only then, when the city and its racist
supporters are brought into submission, will
negotiation be possible.
Senator Ricardo Lara Alert
