Showing posts with label Charlie Kirk. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Charlie Kirk. Show all posts

Tuesday, September 23, 2025

Fryin' Ted: Rep. Lieu Confronted, Triggered Over Charlie Kirk Resolution Vote

Fryin' Ted Gets Triggered

 

Well, this is something you don't see every day.

The Left in Los Angeles are aggressive in their tactics. They will attack Democratic politicians every chance they get because they are not sufficiently left-wing.

The abusive, violent Left celebrated the death of Charlie Kirk. But Congressmen in Washington have to present some level of decorum. It's bad politics to vote against a resolution commemorating Charlie Kirk and condemning his assassination.

House Resolution 719 praised Charlie Kirk and his tireless defense of Christ, America, and freedom of speech.

The Resolution issued condolences to the family of Charlie Kirk, praised law enforcement for their efforts in apprehending the assassin who murdered Kirk, and condemned all political violence.

The insane, evil Left cannot stand any emotions or show of love, support, grace, or care to anyone on the Right or anyone who is conservative.

Yet Democrats were in a tough spot:

1. If they voted against the Resolution, they would be viewed as heartless miscreants who endorse political violence, thus damaging their already tattered political brand.

2. If they voted for the Resolution, they would invite the fury of their left-wing base and progressive voters and donors.

Rep. Ted Lieu voted for the Resolution.

William of "Film the Police LA" confronted Lieu at the Mann Chinese Theater during a political press conference yesterday:


Congresswoman Judy Chu took the questions in stride, pointing out that she voted for the resolution because she condemns political violence.

Congressman Ted Lieu became violent himself when he was confronted about this vote.

William of "Film The Polic LA" refused to let up. He blasted Lieu for supporting "racist" Charlie Kirk, because of his supposed criticism of Dr. Martin Luther King and the Civil Rights Act. Those conversations are much more complex and nuanced than Mr. Film the Police would like to admit, but seeing him make Rep. Lieu uncomfortable is quite entertaining!

And why is Lyin' Ted turning into Fryin' Ted under the pressure?

The Left understands this fundamental rule about politics: you hit your own team harder, demanding that they step up and follow through on every promise and plank in the political platform. Congressional District 36 is very left-leaning, so Lieu has little to fear from Republicans or conservatives. However, if the liberal voters think that Rep. Lieu is selling out his supposed progressive principles and giving into Republicans, they will not only eat him alive, but support a more leftist primary challenger to remove him from office! Many California Democratic Congressmen are facing stiff AOC-style primary challenges for Election 2026, and the last thing they want is to appear as though they are caving to Trump and the Republicans, not fighting aggressively enough against the MAGA agenda.

That's why Lieu's goose is getting cooked--and it's fun to see!

I can't wait to see how else left-wing activists began harassing and confronting these horrid politicians. It's time for them to get a taste of their own abusive medicine for once. 

Monday, September 22, 2025

Full Transcript of President Trump's Funeral Speech for Charlie Kirk

 President Trump praises Charlie Kirk

"Less than two weeks ago, our country was robbed of one of the brightest lights of our times. A giant of his generation and above all, a devoted husband, father, son, Christian and patriot. Charles James Kirk was heinously murdered by a radicalized, cold blooded monster for speaking the truth that was in his heart. He was violently killed because he spoke for freedom and justice for God. Country for reason and for common sense. He was assassinated because he lived bravely. He led boldly, and he argued brilliantly without apology. He did what was right for our nation. And so on that terrible day, September 10th, 2025, our greatest evangelist for American liberty became immortal. He's a martyr now for American freedom. I know I speak for everyone here today when I say that none of us will ever forget Charlie Kirk, and neither now will history. Because while Charlie has been reunited with his creator in heaven, his voice on earth will echo through the generations and his name will live forever. In the eternal chronicle of America's greatest patriots, he will live forever to Charlie's incredible and beautiful widow, Erica. We know the weight of this monumental loss is almost unbearable. But even in the midst of heartache and pain, too great to even fathom, you have somehow found the strength and deep faith to be a comfort to millions and millions of people. And thank you very much, Erica. Thank you very much. Today, an entire nation wraps its loving arms around you and your beautiful children. We share in your immense and overwhelming sorrow, and we vow that we will do everything we can to ensure that your children grow up in a land where their father is honored and revered as a great American hero. That's what he is."


"To Charlie's parents, who lost their beloved son and to the entire Kirk family, we know that no words can ever be enough to fill the void he leaves behind. That's a void that just can't be filled. But I hope the extraordinary outpouring of emotion over these past 11 days has comforted you with the knowledge that your son brought more good and love into this world in his 31 short years than most people. Even very, very successful people can bring in a lifetime. Charlie Kirk loved America with everything he had, and as we can see so clearly today, America loved Charlie Kirk. And he could always draw a big crowd. Look at this today. Look at what's gone on. This is a big crowd. Here today we have the vice president of the United States, J.D. Vance. We have the speaker of the U.S. House of Representatives, Mike Johnson. We have countless members of the United States Senate and I'm sorry, I'm not going to introduce you, but I'll be up here. They were all over the place. And likewise, the House of Representatives. They're all over this big stadium. This is not an arena. This is a stadium, a great cabinet, and this stadium packed with rafters of people, not to mention the one across the street that also has tens of thousands of people. And they're watching us on screen right now."


"And I'm sorry we couldn't get you in. If anybody would like to give up your seat, please walk across the street. But this is like an old time revival, isn't it? An old time revival? For millions of Americans, especially young people, it is agonizing and unthinkable to say goodbye to a patriot whose heart still had so much to give. It's so much. Raised in the suburbs of Chicago, Charlie was filled with the patriotic spirit from his youth, and he was an All-American in everything he did. And one of the last things he said to me is, please, sir, save Chicago. We're going to do that. We're going to save Chicago from a horrible crime. In high school, he was the quarterback of the football team and the captain of the basketball team. He was a good athlete. A lot of people don't know that about Charlie. He was an Eagle Scout who spent his school lunch breaks listening to another champion for Liberty, somebody that he greatly admired. Rush Limbaugh. But what was even more important to Charlie than politics and service was the choice he made in the fifth grade, which he called the most important decision of his life to become a Christian. And they follower of his Savior, Jesus Christ. Inspired by faith and his love of freedom, Charlie did something remarkable when he was just 18 years old, on the advice of a mentor who told him to put off going to college because he was doing so well, he devoted his life to converting young people to the conservative cause. How did he do? Take a look. How did he do? In 2012, two days after graduating high school and with just $1,800 in his pocket, the young man from Illinois who no one had ever heard of started an organization whose grand ambitions were captured in its name, Turning Point USA. Great name."


"And I have a feeling it's going to be bigger and better than ever before. Does that make sense? It's going to be bigger and better than ever before. Look at what's happening. 12 years ago, Charlie walked on to his first college campus. The very liberal University of Wisconsin at Madison. He set up a card table and put up a sign with three words big government sucks. Can you believe that? That's Charlie. That day, Charlie talked to every student who approached him, most of whom were probably quite a bit older than he was. Finally, after many hours, he found the first ever turning point chapter leader. His first year out of high school, Charlie traveled 300 days raising money and taking his message to campuses all over the country. He lived out of his parents basement and they actually loved having him there. They loved they loved Charlie. Everybody loved Charlie. And on the couches of friends and supporters, he lived off of couches for two years, three years. Then life started getting a little bit different. But he was always the same. For five years he refused to take a paycheck, but day after day he worked from 5 a.m. in the morning till 11 p.m. in the evening. Always. His staff remembers that he wore Walmart jeans and t shirts from the goodwill store. Remember the goodwill store? It wasn't easy, but Charlie wasn't in it for money at all. Never has been. Money was never his thing. He was always in it for the mission, as he like to say. Even back then. We have a country to save. We are just what he did. Call me all the time, sir. We have a country to say. I said, Charlie, thanks very much for telling me that. I appreciate Charlie volunteered for my 2016 campaign and traveled the nation with my son Don and Eric. I got to know him very well, and so immediately that Charlie was actually a master builder, master builder of people. It was Charlie who first started organizing young black conservatives, hungry for support and leadership."


"It was Charlie who stood up for persecuted Christians and Jews on college campuses. It was Charlie who helped bring online censorship, free speech and cancel culture to the four of our political debate. He was right up there with me. It was Charlie who helped unite MAGA. And you know what MHR is? That's right. Make America Healthy again. And tomorrow we're going to have one of the biggest announcement ever, really, medically, I think, in the history of our country, we're going to be doing it with Bobby and us and all of the professionals. I think you're going to find it to be amazing. I think we found an answer to autism. How about that? Autism. Tomorrow we're going to be talking in the Oval Office, in the white House about autism, how it happens. So we won't let it happen anymore, and how to get at least somewhat better when you have it so that parents can help their child. A beautiful child. That's a big one. I've been I've been bugging everybody over there. Get the answer to that. You know,, 20 years ago, 1 in 10,000 were born with autism. 20 years ago, the most recent survey says 1 in 12. How bad is that? That's for young boys, baby boys. But also, girls a little bit better. It's about 1 in 20, but we can't. There's obviously there was something really wrong, and we think we know what that is. It's going to be I think it's going to be one of the most important news conferences I'll ever have, and I look so forward to it."


"It was Charlie who stood up for persecuted Christians and Jews on college campuses. It was Charlie who helped bring online censorship, free speech and cancel culture to the four of our political debate. He was right up there with me. It was Charlie who helped unite MAGA. And you know what MHR is? That's right. Make America Healthy again. And tomorrow we're going to have one of the biggest announcement ever, really, medically, I think, in the history of our country, we're going to be doing it with Bobby and us and all of the professionals. I think you're going to find it to be amazing. I think we found an answer to autism. How about that? Autism. Tomorrow we're going to be talking in the Oval Office, in the white House about autism, how it happens. So we won't let it happen anymore, and how to get at least somewhat better when you have it so that parents can help their child. A beautiful child. That's a big one. I've been I've been bugging everybody over there. Get the answer to that. You know,, 20 years ago, 1 in 10,000 were born with autism. 20 years ago, the most recent survey says 1 in 12. How bad is that? That's for young boys, baby boys. But also, girls a little bit better. It's about 1 in 20, but we can't. There's obviously there was something really wrong, and we think we know what that is. It's going to be I think it's going to be one of the most important news conferences I'll ever have, and I look so forward to it. And you know who else looked forward to it? Because he knew. I tell him a little bit about what was going on was Charlie. He would have been front row center, believe me. We'll be missing him tomorrow. It was such a big deal for him to. He brought together Donald Trump, Bobby Kennedy right here in the great state of Arizona one year ago. Remember that? What a what a night, what a day. That was. And it was Charlie who was among the first to speak to me about a man from Ohio by the name of JD Vance. Have you ever heard of him doing a good job? But Charlie would often call me sometimes the night before a big event on the other side of the country. And it asked me. I'd say,, do you think you could come and speak at the event the following day? Right. I'd say, Charlie, I give me a I'm the president of the United States. You want me to travel four hours by plane? And, you know, sometimes I did it. It was a very good guy. He was a very convincing guy. He didn't stop there, but he would ask for things like that. Sir, could you be, tomorrow in California? I said, Charlie, give me a break, please. He just wouldn't stop. And he succeeded. But I almost always went because you never wanted to let Charlie down. He you worked so hard, you just didn't want to let him down. I felt guilty, he'd make me feel very guilty as president. Many people ask me for things, but Charlie was one of the few who always gave more than he took. He was a giver, much more than a taker. And no matter how big Charlie became, no one was too small for him to notice. He was good to everybody, didn't matter. Several years ago, a fourth grader is Charlie to appear on his podcast, which was probably only watched by the parents of that fourth grader, and Charlie, who was actually pretty hot at the time. To be honest. He agreed. And the boy asked for advice. Charlie replied, the left, the left. I call it the radical left. I call it sometimes the radical Left Lunatics. But Charlie didn't say that. He called it the left. He was probably right, but I can't help but, can't. So he said the left radical left alone may have all the money in the world, but they could never outwork me. I will wake up as early as I need to about himself."


"I will stay up as late as I need to, and I will never stop fighting for our country. And he did this until his dying breath. That's what he was doing. That's what he was doing. Think of it. Wow. What a horrible moment. I was in the Oval Office when I heard they came in and I. It was like a surreal experience, a terrible, terrible. I had some very big people in the Oval Office, and I was in the midst of a very important conversation for our country, big people, the biggest. And I said, you have to leave now. When they told me that, they told me in front of a group of very powerful people, I said, you have to leave now. Right now, please. Right now. You have to leave. Go. By his own determination and skill, Charlie Kirk, Bill turning point from his humble beginnings to beginnings that nobody believed could ever end up something like this into a great movement and a juggernaut of American politics. And, you know, we have a massive stadium loaded up with people, but he got tremendous crowds before he had this kind of horrible news. And before we had to hear what happened so terribly, he delivered more than 250 speeches a year at over 200 colleges and universities, and that was at a time when it was not really vogue to go to colleges and universities. If you were a conservative, it really took great courage. And we used to talk and I said, you know, I think there are much more conservative than we know. And he agreed, but it just wasn't something that was happening because the radical left would do very bad things, very dangerous thing."


"But Charlie set up chapters on 2200 campuses and spoke at more than 1000 churches. He launched a podcast and radio show that grew to an audience of 1 million Americans a day. One of the bigger shows on radio, and Charlie didn't just bring young people into the movement. All of a sudden it started to grow by leaps and bounds. By 2024, we won more young people than any Republican candidate in the history of our country, including, for the first time, a majority of males under 30. Can you believe? Remember when Republican presidential candidates would get 4%? No, we did unbelievably with young people. And he was a big, big factor. Unbelievable. But he made me work for it. Sir, you have to make a speech here. You have to make a speech there. But we did it and we won. And our country is doing unbelievably well now. We had a country that was dead one year ago, and now we have the hottest country anywhere in the world. And Charlie helped us make it that one of one of the great people. But through it all, the core of Charlie's message and his basic method never change. It never really changed. He stayed. The same person also, at every campus event, Charlie asked the people who disagreed with him to come forward, and instead of silencing them, he handed them a microphone and let them speak. And he convinced so many of them. It was pretty amazing thing to watch, actually."


"Shortly before Charlie arrived on campus the day he was assassinated, a staff member texted him that there were many critics and students who were opposed to his views and rather strenuously in the crowd, and that actually made him feel good because he he wanted to convince them. He understood. He really did. He understood what was right, and he was right about that. A lot of it was based on common sense, by the way, Charlie wrote back to the staff member saying, I'm not here to fight them. I want to know them and love them, and I want to reach them and try and lead them into a great way of life in our country. In that private moment, on his dying day, we find everything we need to know about who Charlie Kirk truly was. He was a missionary with a noble spirit and a great, great purpose. He did not hate his opponents. He wanted the best for them. That's where I disagreed with Charlie. I hate my opponent and I don't want the best for them. I'm sorry. I am sorry, Erika. But now Erika can talk to me and the whole group and maybe they can convince me that that's not right. But I can't stand my opponent. Charlie's angry. Look at that. He's angry at me that he wasn't interested in demonizing anyone. He was interested in persuading everyone to the ideas and principles he believed were good, right and true. Before each appearance, he prayed these words. God, use me for your will always said the same thing. Use me for your will. And that is exactly what God did when you think that's exactly what he did. The more success Charlie had and he was getting more and more successful, the more dangerous his mission became on campuses all over the country, his quest for open dialog was met with menacing hate."


"There were bomb threats, pulled fire alarms, and countless rage filled radicals who tried to shout him down. It was nasty. I used to say, Charlie, this is nasty stuff. You do it. At one event, police had to build barricades to protect students from an angry mob of thugs. Many of these people, by the way, are paid a lot of money to do this. They're agitators. They're paid agitators. Remember that when you see they all have the same beautifully printed sign, every sign is identical, comes out of a top level print shop. That's not the signs that are made in somebodys basement. Those are paid for by very bad people. And hopefully we're going to be finding out through the DOJ who those people are. At another college, Antifa terrorists shattered windows, threw rocks and tried to storm the building where Charlie was speaking. It was a really bad one. Often dozens of police officers were needed to prevent Left-Wing violence, and the violence comes largely from the left. You don't want to hear that from too many people, do you? And virtually every day for years before he was murdered, Charlie received these horrible death threats. People don't know. I used to talk to him about it, he said. I got some threats. He always felt that when they actually made the threat, they were not the ones to worry about, the ones to worry about, the ones that don't make the threats. I think you know what I mean. He knew the risks, but he and I shared a certain motto never back down and never, ever surrender. Just don't surrender. Never back down."


"He believed it was so strongly, so strong. And he's right. He's totally he's totally right. The radicals and their allies in the media, sometimes referred to as my son, said the fake news media tried to silence Charlie for a simple reason because he was winning and he was winning big. He was taking over college campuses, colleges that had, in theory, only very liberal or, as they like to say, progressive. I call them liberal, but they like to call themselves such a beautiful word, progressive. They're the opposite of progressive, if you think about it. But they were really nasty. And he would go into these colleges all of a sudden within two years, three years, they turned into bastions of conservatism. It was really quite amazing to see they lied about him because they did not want you to listen to him or to learn from him, because what he was talking about and even preaching made so much sense. Everywhere he went. He won the debates. He won the hearts, he won the minds, and yes, he won the elections for people. He helped us. He helped other people. We won the biggest election in the history of our country. I believe. Charlie Kirk was without a doubt among the most influential figures in the most important election in the history of our country."

"Everywhere he went. He won the debates. He won the hearts"

"The election of, oh, that beautiful day, November 5th, 2024. Do you remember that day? It was nine months ago. What a day that was. I mean, we had a pretty good day in the first one. And I must tell you on the second one, we had a phenomenal day, but a lot of bad things happened. And now that's not even questioned. They cheated like dogs, but we got them back then. We have got them back. But we owe Charlie a profound and eternal debt of gratitude. Now, just like Charlie and Erica made Turning Point hot, we are looking at a country that has the chance to attain a level like never before. Tariffs are making us rich again, richer than anybody ever thought was possible, and the only one challenging them are people that hate our country, or foreign countries that are paying a price because they did the same thing to us for years. They took advantage of us. But where we're making money, we're becoming richer and richer, and we're taking care of our people better and better. When we do that, we can take care of other countries better and better, but we're doing unbelievably well. The tariffs have really been a hold. The election was big, but the tariffs because of the election came in. And remember other nations do that to us. And Charlie understood that. He saw the money he saw was coming into our country. And we can use that for Medicare, Medicaid, Social Security, all of these things that we fight so hard for.”

"And that's exactly what's happening. The numbers are incredible. When the news finally came out on election night last November, that the race was officially won came out pretty early in the night. Charlie was live on camera. In that moment, he was overcome with emotion. I've never seen him like this. It was so happy for a long while. He said nothing. His eyes were filled with tears and then he buried his face in his hands and he started crying. That wasn't the Charlie I knew, but in thinking about it, it actually was the Charlie I know because he had a tremendous heart. He just wanted what was good for our country, and he saw us going in such a horrible direction. And this was so beautiful. Erica put a Maga hat on to cover his bald head. I like that very much. MAGA we love does everybody love MAGA? Make America Great again? When Joe Biden used to get up, remember the speeches. We will stop MAGA, we will stop MAGA. You know, he could barely get the words out. We will stop. I said, can somebody inform him? The MAGA means make America great again? How do you say you're going to stop it? And Charlie understood that when Charlie finally looked up and spoke his smile through the watery eyes and simply said, I am humbled by God's grace. That was his statement that night while I was watching him. I was very impressed, actually. It showed he had a big heart."

"Every single American should take a long, hard look at the twisted soul and dark spirit of anyone who would want to kill a young man as good as Charlie, to kill anybody but to kill a man like this. He didn't deserve this. He didn't deserve this. Our country didn't deserve this. And anyone who would make excuses for it are just out of their mind. Charlie's murder was not just an attack on one man or one movement. It was an attack on our entire nation. That was a horrible attack on the United States of America. It was an assault on our most sacred liberties and God given rights. The gun was pointed at him, but the bullet was aimed at all of us. That bullet was aimed at every one of us. Indeed, Charlie was killed for expressing the very ideas that virtually everyone in this arena and most other places throughout our country, deeply believed in. But the assassin failed in his quest because Charlie's message has not been silenced. It now is bigger and better and stronger than ever before, and it's not even close. And it's rare that such a thing happens. But Charlie is bigger today than he was. Think about it just two weeks ago. He's bigger today than it was two weeks ago. Now that may not help his friends and loved ones, of which there are so many and may not help Eric and those beautiful children who have to suffer so horribly through this moment. But they know it's true. He's bigger now than ever before, and he's eternal. He's eternal. And I just want to say we love him and he's looking down at us right now and he's saying, wow, that's a great crowd. He say, that's a great crowd."


"And it's a great crowd of patriots. But that's why I will soon award Charlie the nation's highest civilian honor, the Presidential Medal of Freedom. It's the highest civilian honor. That we will do the ceremony at our beautiful white House in a very safe Washington, D.C., a place that Charlie truly revered. Yeah. We stopped the crime in Washington. Took 12 days. Now you can go to restaurants. You can walk down the middle of the street with your wife. You can have your wife walk alone down the middle of the street. She's got to be in good shape. What a difference. What a difference good management really makes. But it's. Well, I'm so proud of that. Washington DC you know, it's one of the worst in the nation in the world. And now it's considered a very safe city. And, it's also I passed it yesterday. I went through it. And the the lawns are good. It's like a different place. It's like the tents are gone. The threats are gone. The gangs aren't there. We got rid of, you know, we took out 1500 career criminals."


"If you have three career criminals, that can make a big difference. But I'm so proud of Washington's DC. And now we're going into Memphis. And we'll get that one straightened out fast. And then we're going into some others. But we're going to go to Chicago and we're going to have Charlie very much in mind when we go into Chicago. And we'll get that one straightened out. You have an incompetent governor who he thinks it's okay when 11 people get murdered over the weekend. He thinks you don't have any crime. When 11 people get murdered and 28 people get shot. He says he's got crime. No, they they don't have it under control. But we'll have it under control very quickly. So we're going to be doing that. And Charlie loved what we were doing. He was so proud of what happened. He was there. The city are so proud of what happened in Washington DC. As you know, the depraved assassin who planned and executed Charlie's killing has been arrested and charged with capital murder. God willing, he will receive the full and ultimate punishment for his horrific crime. It's a terrible thing. Because you can't let that happen. You can't let that happen. Can't let it happen to a country. The Department of Justice is also investigating networks of radical left maniacs who fund organized fuel and perpetrate political violence and we think we know who many of them are. But law enforcement can only be the beginning of our response to Charlie's murder."


"Over the last 11 days, we have heard stories of commentators, influencers and others in our society who greeted his assassination with sick approval, excuses, or even jubilation. You've heard that some of I couldn't believe it. Some of the very same people who spent the last eight years trying to sit in moral judgment of anyone who disagreed with them about politics, suddenly started cheering for a murder. Incredible. You know, the names? They're, major losers, by the way. There'll be. That will be proven out in a short period of time. Some of the very people who call you a hater for using the wrong pronoun were filled with glee at the killing of a father with two beautiful young children and the same commentators who this week are screaming fascism over a canceled late night TV show where the anchor had no talent and no ratings last week, we're implying that Charlie Kirk deserved what happened to him. No side in American politics has a monopoly on disturbed or misguided people. But there's one part of our political community which believes they have a monopoly on truth, goodness and virtue and concludes they have also a monopoly on power, thought and speech. Well, that's not happening anymore. We've turned that corner very quickly. Tragically, atrocities of this kind and the kind that we saw in Utah of all places, are the eventual consequence of that kind of thinking. If speech is violence, then some are bound to conclude that violence is justified."


"To stop speech, and we're not going to let that be justified. The tradition of reason, an open debate that Charlie practiced, is not a pillar of our democracy in many ways. It's the basis of our entire society. It's the rights and inheritance of every free American. The greatest legacy of the enlightenment, and among the most treasured achievements of civilized nation. We will defend it at all costs, and we will carry forward the torch of liberty that Charlie Kirk held so proud and so high. He was so proud. And he did hold that torch high. We will never, ever let it fail. We will never let it fail. But we're going to raise it higher than ever before. It's got to be raised. And this is the beginning. Perhaps it should be no surprise to Charlie, who spent his life speaking with the critics of these traditions, ultimately became convinced that we needed not just a political realignment, but also a spiritual reawakening. We did. And we have to bring back religion to America, because without borders, law and order and religion, you really don't have a country anymore. We want religion brought back to America. We want to bring God back into our beautiful USA like never before. We want God back. Charlie would have been so pleased to hear his friends and colleagues today giving testimony and giving glory to God."


"Within minutes of the gunshot. In Utah, millions of Americans, young and old, heard the news and dropped to their knees and started praying. Even many who rarely prayed ask God for a miracle. Please God save Charlie. But although Charlie's time with us on earth has ended, those prayers for a miracle have already been answered. Look at what's happening. Look at what's happening. In the days since Charlie's death, we have seen how his legacy has touched so many millions around the world. In Calgary, Canada, thousands gathered at City Hall to sing the American national anthem and raise up posters with the name Charlie Kirk. In Seoul, South Korea, crowds gathered to wave American flags and shout, we are for Charlie Kirk! His memory has been honored in the streets of Berlin, Warsaw, Vienna, Sydney, Madrid, London, Tel Aviv and all over the world. So beautiful to watch. A man as far away as rural Australia texted a pastor. I'm going to come to church tomorrow for the first time ever. The pastor says, why is that? The man replied, Because of Charlie Kirk. Can you imagine? The lesson of Charlie's life is that you should never underestimate what one person can do with a good heart, a righteous cause, a cheerful spirit, and the will to fight, fight, fight, have to fight. While saving our country. And Charlie's a big factor. Such a big factor. Charlie Kirk started with only an idea to change minds on college campuses, and instead he ended up with a far greater achievement changing history. He changed history. Today, Charlie Kirk rests in glory in heaven for all eternity. He has gone from speaking on campuses in Wisconsin to kneeling at the throne of God, where he is right now. We grieve for the friend and leader that we have lost, but we go forward, strengthened by his faith and bolstered by his courage and inspired by his example to defend the country he lived for."


"For the freedoms he died for, and the values in which he so deeply believed. He believed in values that we should all believe in. Charlie created something very special. It's called Turning Point USA, and under the leadership and love of Erica, it will become bigger and better and stronger than ever before. So, Charlie, we all want to thank you. We want to say a very loud God bless you, Charlie. God bless you for what you've done is incredible. And God bless Eric and the children. God bless the United States of America and can I ask Erica, please come out."

Thursday, December 24, 2020

Turning Point USA, Pointing to Moral Decline: Bang Girls and Money Giveaways and Drag Queens

Turning Point USA has continued pushing the boundaries further and further to the left for their operation.



They allow open homosexuals to claim that they are full-on conservatives, like Rob Smith, when in reality, they are unremitting grifters:


A couple of reminders: Rob Smith voted for Bernie Sanders in the 2016 Primary, and he did not vote for Donald Trump at all in the general election.

He even criticized President Trump as recently as 2017 when he wisely decided to ban transgender troops from serving in the military. Don't believe me?

Check out his announcement here:

And check out the video here:



Five years earlier, he actually wrote a column for CNN called "Why Repealing 'Don't Ask, Don't Tell" Isn't Enough". Wow! Does this agenad every say "We made it?" Never.

At their latest Student Action Summit (SAS), TPUSA was flauting flesh and cash for the kiddies.

Check out the display:

 


So we have gyrating "Bang Girls" shooting money out of cannons to kids, but hey, at least they also say "Socialism Sucks", right?

But apparently Cultural Marxism is A-OK with them,

Really. 

And then there's Lady MAGA, a drag queen, who goes around as one of the leading spokesmen (spokesperson? Spokes-human?).

This is all wrong as it is, but at the latest SAS summit, he actually performed in front of these young people at the Summit. Here's the video

Check out the video, in which TPUSA Lady MAGA leaked footage shows him erforming "Vote Bitch!" at the Student Action Summit 2020.

Here's one scene from his drag show (Yes, it was a DRAG SHOW):


And some of his lyrics in this show included:

"You want a hot body?
You want liberty?
You better vote, bitch."

Yes. This is what TPUSA is pushing on kids, all in the name of "fighting the culture war". Really.

Do the parents know about any of this? Do the donors and fundraising promoting this perversion know anything about this?!

This is not conservatism. This is not winning the culture war. This is capitulation to the moral decline engulfing this country. This is wrong. This is evil. This cannot be tolerated anymore.

Turning Point USA needs to turn around and go right, and turn into the ground and go away.


Saturday, November 23, 2019

Charlie Kirk Fail (Again): Calls Christian Truth "Anti-Gay Extremism"

Charlie Kirk may have backed off on handing out green cards to foreign nationals who graduate from American Universities.

But he has not backed away from defending homosexuality as acceptable.

Charlie Kirk with openly gay "conservative" Rob Smith
at The Ohio State University Culture War Town Hall

He keeps pushing this idea that "gay" is some kind of identity, when it's a set of behaviors which should not be normalized. There are many ex-gays. There is no such thing as an "ex-black" or an "ex-male".

Consider this exchange that Charlie Kirk had with another college student at another "Culture War" event:

At the outset, Kirk shames the questioner with "Wow, that's the slippery slope fallacy!"

But it's not a fallacy. The slippery slope is real. Brian Camenker, the President of MassResistance, warned the public about the dangers, short and long-term, posed by normalizing homosexuality, false marriage, and the rest.

Once again, as in other posts and statements, Charlie Kirk goes along with this false premise: "gay people."

It's not an identity. It's a behavior, and it's a mental disorder which should not be promoted or celebrated. Any set of behaviors which diminishes an individual's life-span is neither wise nor good. Why would anyone consider this wise or appropriate?

On another note: loving all people does not mean endorsing their behaviors. It does not mean promoting lifestyles that are destructive and wrong.

In fact, God's Word is pretty clear-cut when it comes to dealing with Christians who do not walk in concourse with the truth :

"I wrote unto you in an epistle not to company with fornicators: Yet not altogether with the fornicators of this world, or with the covetous, or extortioners, or with idolaters; for then must ye needs go out of the world. But now I have written unto you not to keep company, if any man that is called a brother be a fornicator, or covetous, or an idolater, or a railer, or a drunkard, or an extortioner; with such an one no not to eat." (1 Corinthians 5:9-11)

Conservatism should not be normalizing homosexuality, transgenderism, and other sexual paraphilias. It is essential to fight for the family, to fight for children to have a mom and a dad as much as is possible.

I also want to speak to the phrase "I believe marriage is one man and one woman."

It does not matter what I believe. Facts, truth, evidence are not based on what I believe, or what someone else surmises. They are true because they reflect reality. They are true because they are in concert with what is so.

Why Charlie Kirk insists on caving on this issue is just surprising to me.

His exchange with the young student in the video above was really bad form, as well.

When Kirk questioned whether the young man was a proud Trump supporter or not, he then denounced the student because Trump has allied with some openly gay individuals. Peter Thiel, for example, spoke at the RNC Convention. That really is a problem. Our culture is dying. Our culture is in trouble.

You can be a proud Trump supporter and still not agree with everything that he says or does. In fact, even Ed Koch, the liberal New Yorker who began supporting Republican candidates, often told prospective voters: "If you agree with me 70%, vote for me. If you agree with me 100%, see a psychiatrist!"

Then Kirk wanted to deflect the core issue--which is the conflict between calling yourself a Christian and promoting homosexuals who share other conservatives.

He wanted to put the speaker on the spot and make him look bad in front of others. Charlie then went off on how the Bible is the greatest book ever written. OK, great, that is true. But why then does he support promoting lifestyles that are destructive and unbiblical? If the Bible is the greatest book, and he believes in championing Judeo-Christian values, why does he then make exceptions for promoting and accommodating homosexuals?

Then Kirk fired back with this final question: "Why does what people do in the privacy of their own homes matter to you?"

First of all, this whole LGBT agenda, movement, etc. is no longer---and never has been--about safeguarding individuals to engage in sexual perversions in private.

Second of all, sexual perversion has public consequences. The declining human capital, the monetary costs, the mental illness, the venereal diseases which have become so widespread because of these beahavior make it all clear that private behavior has public consequences.

The government has every right to criminalize prostitution, incest, terrorist plots, lying on one's tax forms, etc. These behaviors often occur in private, but they have public consequences.

For moral good to have any guidance, it must be consistent and referenced as unchanging. The principles have to apply in public and in private. Simple as that. This argument of "live and let live" no longer lives up to its standards, simply because the homoseuxal lobby has never been interested in "Live and Let Live".

For decades, the general public heard from homosexual activists that they did not want to disrupt other people's lives. They merely wanted to "live and let live." Yet the truth has always been from LGBT activists: "We live, and you have to live with it", or as one homosexual activist had told me "You have to accept me. I will not accept tolerance." Yet the essence of tolerance is that we do not have to celebrate, like, enjoy, treasure, or prize ideas that we disagree with. Tolerance requires an adherence to clear-cut moral principles, or then a society, a culture turns into a miasma of tyranny,

This libertarian temptation which Charlie Kirk betrays is all too strong with some of these college-level Conservative Inc. types. It needs to be resisted, not accommodated.

Check out this powerful statement that best sums up the need to defend moral virtue:
There is no liberty without morality. There is no peace and prosperity without the rule of law.  There is no social order to allow freedom if there is no fixed moral framework.

It's time for these so-called groypers to get their facts together and strenghten their arguments when dealing with homosexuality, transgenderism, and the influence of other sexual paraphilias into the conservative moment.

It's not "anti-gay extremism" to stand up for natural marriage. The extremism came out of Charlie Kirk, when he went to great lengths to shame the person asking the questions calling out the conflict between Christian revelation and homosexual accommodation which Mr. Kirk has been engaging in for the last three years.

This has been going on much longer than most people realize. Check out what Mark Dice discovered:
No, homosexuals should not be adopting children. Children by many metrics need a mother and father, not two moms or two dads. Where did anyone get this foolish idea that we should begin compromising and appeasing homosexual activists? Why is this going on?

Because for too long, conservatives have continued to cave in the fight for what matters. They allowed the left to one battle after another without fighting back, and the consequences have become catastrophic.

Sunday, November 17, 2019

TPUSA Dumpster Fire on Homosexuality, Transgenderism, and LGBT "Conservatism"

"You gonna speak on the TPUSA dumpsterfire or nah?" -- Russell Wiley



Indeed, many of the TPUSA speakers and leaders had no interest in speaking at length about how badly they handled the so-called "groypers" who descended on the Q and A section shortly after their presentations.

It was really sad to see some of TPUSA's big social media promoters diminishing and shaming the right-of-center critics who were calling out the left-wing descent of the conservative movement in the United States:

It's been three weeks since The Ohio State University "Culture War" dumpster fire. I wanted to share some more thoughts on what transpired that day, and why it was a watershed moment in the pro-family movement.

Whether a question is "trolling" or a genuine question, people should provide some kind of answer. They should not retreat away from offering something. Just because someone is "trolling" does not mean that there is no proper way to respond effectively and put an end to the discussion properly.

Answer the question directly and effectively. If the person insists on perverse talking points, with no interest in making an argument or making a point, then call them out on it. I have had this experience a few times. Some of these trolls will insist that race and IQ are so intertwined as to be determinant, and there is no dissuading them. They are convinced that "The Jooz" control the media, control the corporations, control the United States' foreign policy.

There is simply no talking to them. Just speak the truth, refute their statements, call them out when they end up repeating themselves, and move on.

Now, about all these smears and attacks against conservatives, especially young conservatives, who do not want endorsement and promotions of homosexuality and transgenderism ...

They are not "New Westboro Baptist Kids." Such name-called is childish, immature, and evades debate. It is not hateful to defend natural marriage, life, and family. The bedrock of any culture is not the government, not the state, not the village, but it is the family. It takes a Mom and Dad, not two Moms, not two Dads, not a collective.

These young people were right to start asking the tough questions. It was not baseless trolling to point out that TPUSA is a libertarian front. There is no liberty without morality, however, and values, whether shared or individual, have to have some eternal basis to be ... values.




Conservatism must be based on biological fact and Biblic truth, not bigotry and bleating. Such coarse rancor belongs to the regressive Left. The fact that talking heads like Benny Johnson resort to such tactics simply proves how far to the left we have seen mainstream conservatives go to "engage the culture."

Of course, there are some other left-leaning traits which Mr. Benny Johnson has evinced in the past:

Dude, where's your integrity? Seriously?!

At any rate, the TPUSA Culture War was a dumpster fire. They wanted to defend homosexuality, gay sex, transgenderism, drag queens, and all the rest. This is just wrong. There is no value in bending over backwards (pun intended and unintended) in a perverse attempt to get more people to vote for conservative candidates.

It's time to stand for what is right. It's time to draw some golden lines, to "Build the Wall" around clear-cut, Judeo-Christian conservative principles, not just along the Southern Border.


Monday, November 4, 2019

Reflections on TPUSA “Culture War” Town Hall at The Ohio State University


On October 29th, 2019, Turning Point USA, headed by Charlie Kirk, hosted their 6th “Culture War” panel taking on some harder hitting questions in the brewing fight of moral and cultural issues culture. This sixth forum took place at Ohio State University, and the hard-hitting questions came … hard. Before I get to the events that transpired, I want to provide a little background about Turning Point USA.



Kirk wants to take on the so-called culture war. Ok, but why is he inviting guest hosts who are pretty liberal on some of the cultural issues? For example, Tomi Lahren, one his guests in different TPUSA forums, is a center-right leaning pundit, but she is pro-choice. Abortion is one of the most contentious issues in the culture war.  More disconcerting, Kirk invited a guest panelist/participant named Rob Smith. Smith is black, an Iraq war veteran, and he’s openly gay. Yes, and he is proud of it. On an episode of Tucker Carlson, Smith announced without any reserve or hesitation that he was “married” to a husband.

Why does TPUSA invite speakers and guest hosts who are fighting against conservatives and conservatism on the culture war? Someone please explain to me how anyone fights a culture war when the key partisans in the fight have all but given up fighting the culture war to begin with?
Furthermore, Charlie Kirk took photos with “Lady MAGA” proudly at the 2019 Politicon Convention, which took place in Tennessee this year (probably due to the fact that fewer people every year are attending the convention, in large part because the discussions panels are one-sides and the panelists are repetitive and distinctly anti-Trump). Lady MAGA is a drag queen. Why are conservatives normalizing, promoting sexual deviance?

So, with that background laid down, let’s review the key events of the October 29th, 2019 TPUSA forum.

During the question period, a young man named Dave Reilly came up to the mike and said:
“We understand that sexual liberation is political control. It’s a form of political control. You have advocated multiple times on accepting homosexuality, accepting homosexual acts as normative in the conservative movement. How does anal sex help us win the culture war?”



BAM! I was shocked and greatly pleased that a younger person finally put this question out there. Why are conservatives continuing to cave on the issues of homosexuality, gay marriage, and now transgenderism? Why are conservative pundits running away from taking a stand on the fundamental conservative principle of family? For the last five years, I have been sounding the alarm about the moral decay associated with homosexuality, and the political tyranny which is coming in the wake of the whole LGBT Agenda. It seemed that my outrage was falling on deaf ears. Those fears were dispelled on October 29th at Ohio State University. It was so gratifying to hear someone from the younger generation speak out about this, and call out these so-called conservatives for pandering to the so-called LGBT community in their push for a more “inclusive” conservatism.

The audience erupted with loud cheers and cries of support for the question. It was really stunning! The answers from Kirk and Smith were quite revealing. Smith immediately attacked Reilly: “Can you have the balls to ask the gay man on the stage that question?” Reilly had asked both of them. His question was bold, and he had boldly asked it. There should be no question about the young man’s courage. Smith began to sputter and repeat himself a little bit, as he was clearly caught off guard by this question.

Smith then gave a non-answer:

“This is America. This is the greatest freakin’ nation in the world. We realize that America is great because we have Western values.”

Right—and one of those Western values is the nuclear family and sex as best expressed within the confines of marriage between one man and one woman. So what was the point of that statement Smith continued:

“We realize that gays and lesbians get to contribute to American society in the same way that everybody else is.”

What exactly do they “contribute” in their status as living out sexual perversion? They do not give birth to children, for starters. On top of that, the sexually destructive behaviors lead to mental and emotional problems, as well as the spread of venereal disease. On top of that, LGBT militancy has forced perverse curricula into public schools, without parental knowledge or permission. Individuals who choose not to celebrate LGBT activities and ideas are hounded out of the public square, sued in court, lose their jobs, or even face jail time. How is this contributing anything worthwhile to America?



Smith then added: “When you continue doing that, you realize that we are here, we are able to do everything.” What kind of answer was this? It showed once again that Smith was caught off guard and clearly offended by the question, as though anyone should question his behaviors. Then Smith played the veteran card, as if to silence further debate.

“I served in the military …

Reilly cut through the debate and asked again: “How does homosexual sex help us win the culture war?”

Smith tried spin it back on Reilly, as though he was affirming that homosexuality is helping conservatives win the culture war. Then Smith used the basest response yet: “It’s a BS question. It’s not a good faith question.”

Wrong, Rob! Wrong, Charlie! Wrong, TPUSA! It’s an EXCELLENT question. The loud chorus of boos which followed Rob’s arrogant, dismissive response confirmed that Reilly’s question was well-taken.

I have waited a long time for someone to start asking these tough questions, to start putting the screw to political pundits and elected officials. Why is the conservative movement in general, and Republican officials in particular, caving on the LGBT issues?  At the Republican National Committee Convention in 2016, pro-family and Evangelical forces strived to maintain the pro-life and pro-family planks of the party platform. They not only succeeded, but exceeded expectations. The RNC platform rejects the Obergefell “gay marriage” decision, rejects transgender bathrooms, and even affirms the value of reparative therapy for individuals seeking to leave LGBT behaviors.
And yet, elected officials in Congress put up the weakest arguments to stop the Equality Act, legislation which if passed would pervert the Civil Rights Act of 1964 to treat sexual perversions like homosexual, transgenderism, and even pedophilia as civil rights. The wrecking ball damage of state-sponsored tyranny that would result from the passage of this law is incalculable if she legislation was enacted into law.

Conservative pundits refuse to question the fundamental arguments about homosexuality and transgenderism, such as “Are people really born that way?” Other questions, like “Why are we normalizing mental illness” and “Should we allow drag queens around children” have become more prominent, as well. Sadly, libertarian-leaning pundits like David French have actually DEFENDED Drag Queen Story Hour. Unbelievable. How much more are conservatives going to tolerate on this LGBT front or rather affront?

Trying to help Rob Smith save face at The Ohio State University forum, Charlie Kirk jumped in:
“Honestly, I don’t care what two consenting adults do …

Reilly shouted back: “You should!”

Yes, we should. Private morality, or the lack thereof, does indeed have public consequences. Nations have criminalized incest, for example, even if it were to take place between two consenting adults. Prostitution is also criminalized, because she rampant sexual perversion undermines the moral fabric of a community as well as endangering public health. Kirk then adopted a similar attitude of derision toward Reilly and retorted: “Your hyper focus on it is kinda weird.” Smith then piled on: “You seem to be really interested in gay sex. If you’re into that, you can go find someone to do it with.”

Of course, the last comments were an example of a staggering left-wing tactic: don’t debate the issue, attack the person. Individuals who rightly oppose homosexuality, including its rampant promotion and pervasiveness, get slammed as “closet homosexuals” in turn. Really bad form, Charlie and Ron. Really bad!  So much for an honest debate. Rob couldn’t leave well enough alone. What he followed up with next was really degrading: “Someone like that has no place in the conservative movement. That is so behind the times.”

Another chorus of boos followed, as was warranted. Wasn’t the whole Culture War forum about debating cultural issues? No one of the panelists is suggesting that that pro-family conservative has no place there. Sounds like a robust form of censorship. And since when has conservatism been about being up with “the times”? Since when has civilization, Biblical morality, or scientific fact had anything to do with fads and passing opinions? The very nature of conservatism is protection of revered institutions with a commitment to deliberate—thoughtful and slow—change if needed. Conservatism is about fighting for eternal values, not going with the flow.

The next questioner didn’t let this disregard from the two panelists pass:



“We don’t want centrists in the conservative movement. We want to retain our core values. We don’t want drag queens … You’ve advocated for homosexuality. You said there is a place for the gay agenda in the conservative movement. You’re also comfortable with transgenders and cross-dressers. So my questions, is there any points where conservatives should take a moral stance on Christian morality or should we abandon it altogether? What is your brand of conservatism doing to conserve Christian morality?”

ANOTHER GREAT QUESTION!

Conservativism, to be robust and effective, must be firmly planted in Judeo-Christian values. Yes, indeed. Islamic values, which in a chronological sense are quite progressive, considering that the Koran was written after the Torah and New Testament, do not bolster conservatism, but rather a large state at the expense of individual liberty, and even freedom of conscience. Hinduism rejects scientific fact in large measure, and even Buddhism and Daoism abandon rugged skepticism for blind mysticism. The fusion of faith and reason is essential to conservatism, and this fusion is best portrayed in the Judeo-Christian ethic.

Using another left-wing tactic, shaming the questioner rather than debating the question, Kirk pointed at Smith and said “So, you’re saying that you don’t want him in the movement?” Then he said, “I want to rationally understand an irrational position.”

What a sham deflection! Once again, instead of responding, Charlie attacks the guy. The second questioner was really clear about defending natural marriage. What is so hard about responding to that? Easy—TPUSA is NOT interesting in conserving the culture, not interested in conserving morality—and those two young men called them out on it.

Rob Smith tried to give a more spirited defense for his homosexuality while also denigrated the more insidious iterations of the LGBT movement in our culture. He talked about the “alphabet soup left.” He then referred the whole movement to allow children to transition into another gender as “garbage.” It’s not just garbage—it’s evil! Then Smith called himself a “gay Christian.”
This is nonsensical. There is no “gay” identity. Homosexuality is a behavior, even an ideology, but not an identity. Charlie Kirk says “I’m a Christian, and I think the Bible is the greatest book ever written.”

OK, well what do Christians find that the Bible says about homosexuality?

“For this cause God gave them up unto vile affections: for even their women did change the natural use into that which is against nature: And likewise also the men, leaving the natural use of the woman, burned in their lust one toward another; men with men working that which is unseemly, and receiving in themselves that recompence of their error which was meet.” (Romans 1:26-27)

And

“Be not deceived: neither fornicators, nor idolaters, nor adulterers, nor effeminate, nor abusers of themselves with mankind, 10Nor thieves, nor covetous, nor drunkards, nor revilers, nor extortioners, shall inherit the kingdom of God. 11And such were some of you” (1 Corinthians 6:9-11)

You cannot be a Christian and walk openly in sin. The grace of God teaches us to deny ungodliness and live godly lives (Titus 2:11-14)—and that includes rejecting homosexual behaviors and embracing a new identity in Christ (1 John 4:17). I submit that there are Christians who struggle with same-sex temptations or gender dysphoria. Life in Christ is a process of growing in grace (2 Peter 3:18), and there are many Christians who may not understand their full standing and the fulfilled promises which they can claim in Christ Jesus.

But the notion of a “Gay Christian” is not sound doctrine and should not be tolerated. The notion of “gay conservative” is also untenable. There may be conservatives who struggle with same-sex temptations, just as there are conservatives who eat too much, drink alcohol to excess, etc.—but in no way should these behaviors be celebrated as identities and welcomed into conservative movements as a part of a broader “inclusive” outreach.

For the last 20 years, conservatives have been bombarded with this harsh talking point—mostly from the media, major corporate interests, and liberal activist groups—that conservatives, that Republicans need to be a Big Tent. What conservatives seem to forget, however, is that a tent has to be grounded in something, cover something, and stand for something. Otherwise, it’s a piece of cloth on the ground, no matter how big, which everyone can walk on, and which does not serve its intended purpose.

And this is precisely why conservatism is not conserving anything. Instead of taking a stand on moral issues, conservative activists and the politicians they elect accommodate and give up. They have continued to cede ground on the complex yet compelling moral issues of our day. The attitude has been “we can’t win on this issue. Let’s just give up and focus on what we can win on.” And it’s not working. The Overton Window has moved so far to the left, that we have Drag Queens in our libraries and pornographic images pushed on our children in public schools as “sex education.”
This stand-and-retreat accommodationism is not acceptable.

Donald Trump didn’t run that kind of campaign when he ran for President. He responded effectively to the border crises and immigration problems that this country faces. He spoke openly about the plight of mothers and fathers who lost their children to illegal aliens, even when the mainstream media and political class refused to talk about them. He recognized the damage done by “free trade” policies—which were not really free trade—and how they eviscerated our country’s manufacturing base. He also responded boldly to the problems of radical Muslims, Islam, Islamic terror, and the coming refugee crisis which had overrun Europe.

The Pro-Life Movement is not that kind of movement, either. Since 1973, when Roe v. Wade was shoved onto the country by judicial fiat, pro-life activists have punched back twice as hard, doubled-down on their demands to make abortion illegal and to make life the best choice for mothers and fathers to make. 40 years later, the pro-life movement has become distinctly militant and effective. A number of states have criminalized abortions after different timetables closer to the actual conception of the child. They continue pressuring lawmakers to take a firm stance on the life issue. In the last ten months, Congressional Republicans have tried to bring up a bill 85 times to spare the lives of babies born alive after a botched abortion. When they were in the majority, Congressional Republicans attempted to repeal Obamacare only  55 times. The pro-life movement has been so driven, that even bluntly pro-choice real estate mogul Donald Trump became the most pro-life Republican President on record—even more than Reagan, and actually fulfilled the promises offered by previous Republican administrations to defund Planned Parenthood and install an unprecedented number of pro-life judges and executive officials.



That kind of robust advocacy and consistency, not leniency, is needed in the culture war. Ironically, TPUSA’s “Culture War” town halls have shown how this and other so-called conservative movements are more like “culture surrenders”. The garbled and perverse responses from Charlie Kirk and Rob Smith on the infiltration of homosexuality into mainstream conservatism really called this out, and called out it quite well.

I am so glad that the young men who lined up to ask questions put the issues out there so succinctly. It’s time to hold political pundits, commentators and gatekeepers to higher standards. We need to be confronting our elected officials and national opinion makers on these issues, especially the integrity of the family and the rampant moral corruption of the LGBT movement. Let’s hope that more young people will ask these hard questions to mainstream conservative leaders and proponents and put a stop to this LGNBT pandering and disregard for faith and family, not just freedom.

TPUSA is a blight on conservatism, and they were finally called out for it. Now it’s time for battle-tested, war-minded conservatives to take up the fight for faith, family, and freedom and call out this insidious LGBT Agenda, which has warped its way among the Christian faithful and within the conservative movement in the United States and around the world. If younger people can ask these bold questions and take conservative thought-leaders to task, what’s holding back the rest of us?