He is a mature tactician who understands the larger issues at stake.
The New World Order elements seeking to silence individuals, undermine nations, and remove true recognition of God and country are doing everything they can to silence the truth.
Elon Musk has struck back at them, opening up Twitter usage, and allowing more people to comment, share their ideas, get their thoughts out.
Musk has not taken the strongest steps toward advancing free speech, but he is doing much more than Jack Dorsey or his bureaucratic lackeys ever allowed.
People all over the world are clamoring for Musk to bring back Alex Jones.
He has declined to do so.
He has declined to do so ... at this time.
But Alex Jones has a strong, adult response to this refusal.
Kudos to Alex Jones for sponsoring a debate between Robert Barnes and Nick Fuentes.
Here's the link. I cannot share this link on Facebook, since they are doing the bidding of Communist China, and they will not allow Alex Jones' program to be posted on their site. After all, Jones has gone out of his way to expose all the evil that the Chinese Communist Party is doing around the world.
His debate debunking anti-Zionism, anti-Semitism, and pretty much upended the Groyper obsession with denouncing Israel while ignoring Islamic militancy and promoting Iran was excellent.
Here's some takeaways from the debate:
Watching people who hate Israel defend IslamoFascism as totally safe and no problem for America might be a hint that they are not on the winning side...
I want to make sure that there is no amnesty. Giving amnesty or some kind of legal status to the "illegal kids" would trigger massive immigration from the same countries. Can we ever forget what happened in 2014? President Trump announced DACA in 2012. Then tens of thousands of young illegal aliens crowded the borders and surrendered themselves.
Breitbart Texas exposed the whole immigration fiasco, and the unintended consequences of all the "DREAMer" talk ended up cutting House Majority Leader Eric Cantor's career.
American citizens need to be the priority of the American government.
No more shame, no more guilt trips, and no more stalling.
No DACA! No amnesty! No racist USA!
What did InfoWars have to report?
I do agree with Alex Jones' assessment on the DACA issue versus all the other good that Trump has been doing.
It's only gotten better, by the way. The Trump Administration has cut off VISAs to countries which refuse to take back their illegal alien populations in our country. He has also ended contracts with illegal aliens in our military.
The wall is getting built--and that does include repairing the already extant fences.
But there should be no more amnesties whatsoever. I also believe that this country needs to curtail legal immigration and rethink the entire H-1B VISA program entirely.
Despite my concerns--and Jones' argument that right-wing immigration purists are just engaging in virtue signaling--I think that Trump has not stepped away from doing what is best.
After all, I went all over Congress over the past two days lobbying Congressmen to reject any DACA/amnesty deal.
The title for this segment on InfoWars was really telling and encouraging.
What I endured in Berkeley forced the press to expose the hateful face of Antifa.
They are the Nazis, they are the bigots, the are the Modern Day KKK--all connected with the hateful, corrupt, evil Democratic Party.
It's time for us to stand tall and speak out with the truth: We will not tolerate these intolerant, hateful anti-liberty, anti-free speech hatemongers in our country any longer.
The rule of law, and the right of individual citizens will prevail.
Conservatives need to understand that our ongoing fights with communistic elements, whether in the media or in public forums, is about a lot more than trying to change the minds of the leftists themselves. They are only interested in entertaining and audience and shaming their conservative, pro-liberty opponents.
This fact of modern political discourse is still lost on a lot of conservatives. Progressive radicals are bullies at their core. They are not interested in discussion. They are not even interested in any kind of an exchange of ideas. It's not about wisdom at all. It's about raw power, and silencing opponents, whether through shame or brute force.
Conservatives need to expose the shameful lies and abusive tactics of the left. When entering into a wide-range or public discussion about issues, every conservative needs to decide whether they are dealing with a true believer or a craven showman.
Ben Shapiro understood this distinction, and as a guest on Piers Morgan's CNN talk show, he demolished the British elitist before he could ask the first question.
Check out that stunning interview below:
You will notice that Shapiro invites Morgan to have a "rational discussion," knowing full well that the British propagandist was not interested in a reasonable discussion in the first place.
Now, let's look at how NOT to debate or discuss issues with raging progressive leftists.
Check out the hour long "discussion" between The Young Turks Host Cenk Uygur and Dinesh D'Souza:
Throughout this discussion, Cenk bullies and shames Dinesh. He has very little interest in discussion. Uygur just wanted to mock and shame his opponent. He made freuent personal attacks against the conservative panelist. He repeatedly reminded the audience that D'Souza had serve time following a conviction.
If anyone bothers to listen to the Young Turks spokesman, they will notice how often he characteristics D'Souza and the facts of his criminal case, as well as his political views, and also the history of the Democratic and Republican Parties.
Uygur refuses to answer uestions, refuses to respond to D'Souza ...
Refuses to debate.
It was never really about debating in the first place. The whole scene, including a large mass of Young Turks cheerleaders in the audience, was designed simply to humiliate Dinesh, and turn the mini-drama into further proof that conservatism is wrong and the Left, the liberal progressives are right.
What is the proper way to handle left-wing bullies? Conservatives need to recognize that a combative approach does not mean that ideas will not be shared. Confronting arrogant liberals and proving them wrong is easy and fun. They also need to encourage supporters to join them in making their case.
Conservatives have the inherent advantage. Our ideas are consistent with reality and correct. Therefore, an argument which reverts to facts will work in our best interest. Because liberals rely on contradictions which they refuse to face, exposing their errors, humilitating them essentially in front of a third party, is not hard to accomplish.
But setting terms of debate and ensuring conflict as a rule, playing to an audience, is essential.
Witness how Alex Jones of InfoWars handled Cenk Uygur at the Republican National Convention earlier this year:
Essentially, Alex Jones gave Cenk and his fellow Young Turks a taste of their own medicine.
He did not want for a staged and prepared debate, but confronted Uygur.
He asked the Young Turk about his "Hillary for Prison" T-shirts.
This is not just a plug for his products. He makes a strong assertion about the Democratic Presidential nominee. She is corrupt, and she belongs in prison. Will Cenk respond to this charge? Notice that Jones is not interested in trying to engage a placid discussion, but rather expose how the progressive "newscaster" is a mouthpiece for liberal ideas rather than a forum for discussing ideas.
In fact, the Progressive Left is not about discussion at all, never has been never will be. It's about power and force, it's about the employment of Saul Alinksy tactics to personalize, polarize, then demonize political opponents. Why? Because the left does not have any winning ideas worth debating! It's all identity politics and power differentials.
Notice that Roger Stone shows up, a conservative anchor who finally gets a few words in with Cenk. "You never gave me a chance to talk when I'm your show," chides Stone. At the same time, Jones takes out a Bill Clinton shirt with the word "Rape" underneath it. This attacks stirs up more anger from Cenk.
He is losing his cool. He is no longer the bully. He is the one getting bullied, because that's all that Cenk Uygur and his illiberal cohorts really do on their show. Then the argument gets heated. An audience of conference attendees joings around the two talk show hosts, and Uygur the control-freak loses his cool. He resorts to the only skills that he and other leftists possess: personal attacks.
It makes Cenk look really bad!
Then Ana Kasparian shows up and shouts "F--k" over and over again, trying to get Alex Jones' staffers of the stage. Now, all of this would have been easily settled if Cenk Uygur answered some of Stone and Jones' uestions. Notice at one point Alex invited Roger to come back and debate Cenk, but Cenk didn't want to debate!
The aftermath of this confrontation was interesting. Uygur tried to smooth out his terrible response:
It was awful. The fact that he had to explain himself--he automatically lost again!
Final Reflection
Cenk Uygur exposes to the world that Alex Jones and Roger Stones got completely under his skin, and under Ana Kasparian's skin too. That was ten more minutes of his broadcast taken from his left-wing rants. Cenk complains about their rants and insults. He also faulted Alex Jones and Roger Stone for not offering rational arguments and to have a reasonable discussion.
And yet, that’s exactly what the Young Turks do!
Win-Win for Alex Jones.
Take copious notes, and go forth and drive liberals crazy!
