Kenya MassResistance Hosts Successful Three Day Training!

 

Kenya MassResistance three-day training for youth to “resist the LGBT agenda” a big success!

Held at a church and a high school in Nairobi. Included 163 high school and college students.

Powerful information enables youth to fight back against the LGBT assault on Kenya.

December 21, 2024

 Senior Pastor Benard Bezalel began the first day’s session by teaching about MassResistance and its work around the world – and the role of Kenya MassResistance.

As we reported in our previous post, MassResistance is helping Christians in Kenya fight the well-funded LGBT assault on their country that’s targeting young children and teenagers.

A dynamic Kenya MassResistance chapter was formed by a group of pastors, schoolteachers, a school headmaster, a school coach, mental health professionals, and others. The new MassResistance chapter has now begun training high school and college students to resist and counter the LGBT agenda –  and to help their friends and neighbors do it. (See photos below.)

Powerful  - and critical – training for Kenyan youth

MassResistance designed a comprehensive multi-day course for them to teach high school and college students. It includes a critical information, facts, reasoning, and counter arguments about the LGBT behaviors and lifestyle and how it operates in Kenya – presented as intertwined in a solid Biblical framework. There were also discussion topics, role-playing, and other student interactions to reinforce the material. Several excellent instructors from Kenya MassResistance took part in teaching and helping to run the training.

The LGBT targeting of youth in Kenya has alarmed parents across the country. Word of the Kenya MassResistance effort quickly spread among Christians!

To reach as many students as possible, this first training took place at two separate venues. On December 17 and 18, it was held as a two-day session at a Nairobi church and included 50 high school and college students. On December 20, it was consolidated into a one-day event and took place at a local high school and included 63 students.

In addition to course materials, the speakers and (and some student leaders) were given colorful “Kenya MassResistance” T-shirts to wear during the sessions.

Both events were very well received. Most of the students had never heard the other side of the LGBT arguments, and certainly had not been presented with such a range of facts and critical information. More people want to get involved, the pastors told us, and this could make a big difference in the country.

Here are some highlights:

Two-day session at the church

This pastor gave an excellent talk on “identity, gender, and sexuality.” He went right to work debunking the LGBT talking points: What is our identity? We are made in God’s image. God made you who you are: man and woman. You are only one or the other. You can choose self-acceptance or self-loathing. This is about Godliness versus idolatry. Same-sex physical relations are a sin, and the LGBT movement is trying to steal your identity. It is their way of promoting immorality versus morality.

This woman, a health care professional, outlined the numerous health problems and emotional issues of associated with homosexuality, transgenderism, and related behaviors. “The truth is the Word of God,” she told the students, “but they want to subvert it.”

This man described various LGBT groups in Kenya, how they got there, and what each one is doing to push the larger agenda. He also discussed reasons why there are so many LGBTQ organizations in their country.

This speaker talked in Swahili (Kenya’s native language) about students who have been molested in school by fellow students who have been lured into homosexuality. There was also discussion about teachers who are ringleaders pushing acceptance and normalization of LGBT behaviors to students.

Near the end of the second day, Pastor Benard Bazelel spoke again and went over the lies of the LGBT movement and how to counter them. He debunked the arguments that LGBT groups use to persuade students to accept those behaviors. He broke down the terms “sexual identity” and “sexual orientation.” He also discussed how the LGBT movement uses “feelings” to confuse people, and persuade them that it’s about “love.”  The conflict pits Biblical marriage versus the idea that “anyone can have sex with anyone.” You are not a servant of your feelings, he told them.

 Students broke up into groups, for role-playing, question & answer, and discussion.

 A few of the students (wearing their Kenya MassResistance T-shirts) came up to the stage for a photo.

 The back sides of the Kenya MassResistance T-shirts say: “Resist the devil”!

One-day training session at a high school in Nairobi

The one-day December 20 session at a local Nairobi high school, even more students (63) participated. It was largely the same curriculum from the other training session, consolidated into one day. As at the church, the students seemed genuinely pleased to learn the truth about the propaganda that most of them had been hearing.

Even though the LGBT agenda has infiltrated most Kenyan schools through money and influence, many school principals disapprove and are willing to let Kenya MassResistance come in to present the other side.

 A Kenya MassResistance speaker addressing the students at the high school.

 They were definitely interested in hearing the truth after all the LGBT propaganda that's been spread.

 Students were energized and ready for action!

Moving forward

Both sessions ended with discussion of continued support and engagement with the students. Kenya MassResistance is already planning is to hold more youth training sessions across the country.

The Kenya LGBT groups have figured out what’s happening and will likely try to stop those sessions. Well-known Kenyan LGBT activists have begun following Kenya MassResistance on social media. But these Christians will not be backing down at all! The pastors said, “Let’s take it to them!”

Momentum is gathering. Over the past week, another town in Kenya and another African country has asked to be part of the training.

Final thoughts

It was a very exciting and inspiring three days! As noted, the students seemed grateful they received this training. Many, if not all, had been subjected to LGBT propaganda (or worse) and needed spiritual and factual ammunition to fight back.

Embarrassingly for us, these Kenyans are more eager to take on the predatory LGBT forces than most American parents and church people these days. It’s both refreshing and saddening.

There definitely will be more to report from Africa on this battle!

   

Please help us continue to do our uncompromising work!

Our successes depend on people like you.

Donate to MassResistance

Your support will make the difference!

CA MassResistance: Exposing Norwalk-La Mirada "Karens" Marie and Rudy Miranda

Rudy and Marie Miranda, the NLMUSD "Karens"

[Arthur Schaper's speech to the December 16, 2024 Norwalk-La Mirada School Board meeting]:

Today is a really exciting day for Norwalk La Mirada School District.

Congratulations to Espie Free and Becky Langenwalter.

It's also an exciting day for MassResistance. 

Since the middle of 2023, I have been privileged to work with a number of wonderful parents in this community, men and women who did not want their children subjected to getting directions on obtaining abortions or sex change procedures from a so-called well-being center at one of the high schools. 

What has been really exciting about working with the parents in this community is that they have stayed active despite a major victory last June, when we received word from the principal and then from other staff that the well-being Center was going to be shut down for good. 

The work is not done however, because there are still obscene books in the school libraries, and there are LGBT clubs that have no business being available to kids, and there is still the aftermath of the COVID-19 lockdowns. There is also grave danger with the upcoming ethnic studies program, which seeks to divide rather than unite students. We should not allow that to happen.

There are also ongoing concerns about this upcoming superintendent Natasha Baker. Will she treat teachers and staff with respect? Will she listen to the needs of students and the concerns of parents? You need to keep a close on her and make sure that she has learned the lessons from her failures at Banning and Fresno Unified.

MassResistance parents are still committed to fighting the good fight and ensuring that the school district continues to put the needs of children and the rights of parents first and shows a commitment to getting rid of all of this woke DEI LGBT garbage in the school district once and for all. 

Last of all, I am compelled to speak out against a hateful Karen named Marie Miranda and her shameful husband Rudy Miranda. These despicable people have routinely defamed parents in this community, calling them terrorists and extremists simply because they don't want perversion being pushed on their children. 

Their kind of bigotry reminds me of the Nazi movement that sought to label, libel, and then eliminate people they disagreed with. The only difference between them and the Ku Klux Klan is that they don't have the dignity to put white shawls to hide their faces, and their anti-religious bigotry is so great that they wouldn’t burn crosses on people’s lawns.

Such adults who work with children, and then come to a school board meeting and call parents terrorists have no business being around children, and I think that the school district needs to take a stand on this kind of abuse. 

The fact of the matter is that abusive Karens like Marie Miranda can't handle the fact that the parents voted. They voted to get rid of all of the woke nonsense, and they want a school board that will actually listen to them rather than listen to hateful partisans like the Mirandas. Last of all I would like everyone in the audience to raise your hand if you are a resident in the Norwalk La Mirada School District. For some reason, bigots like Marie and Rudy Miranda oppose democracy and here don't think you matter.

That’s the real extremism, and it needs to be opposed with our collective voices.

(Here's the video recording of my comments):

ICYMI: MassResistance on Fox News Denouncing "Drag Queen Story Hour" (2019)

June 2019 was a great time.

MassResistance was fighting for Robert Hoogland.

Our Texas chapter exposed the drag queen sex offenders at the Houston Library.

And I debated this issue with a pro-drag queen liberal "Christian" on Fox News:

“This is not diversity—this is perversity! Why do we advertise perverse lifestyles to our children? Why are adult homosexual men/entertainers going to libraries and dancing in front of children?!” @ArthurCSchaper @IngrahamAngle pic.twitter.com/92b4LBDQgY

— 🇺🇸California Condor🇺🇸 (@Condor_Law) June 14, 2019

I was the only one who had the courage to call out homosexuality and transgenderism as harmful behaviors. I refused to buy into the "gay conservative" lie.

And Laura Ingraham was so unhappy that I called out all this crap, that she canceled me live on air.

It's a real shame that many pro-family advocates do not have the broad opportunity to speak out against perversion with such direct necessity.

What Happens to Unclaimed Dead in LA County (December 14, 2024)

 

This week we held our annual Burial of the Unclaimed Dead ceremony, where we laid to rest the 1,865 people who passed away in LA County in 2021 without anyone to claim their remains. 

Every year, I make it a point to attend this ceremony. It is one of the more special things we do as a County—upholding our commitment since 1896 that everyone in LA County, no matter their means, is laid to rest with dignity. These people may have been strangers to us, but they are no less worthy of our recognition. May their souls now rest in peace. 

TAC: Ignored History of the Bill of Rights

 

Bill of Rights Ignored History Forgotten Role of the 10th Amendment

The Bill of Rights was born from intense battles between Federalists and Anti-Federalists over delegated and reserved powers. This clash not only shaped its contested origins but also left its true purpose misunderstood to this day. 1. Initial Efforts Rejected During the Philadelphia Convention on Sept. 12, 1787, George Mason proposed adding a declaration of rights to the Constitution, but his motion was overwhelmingly rejected. Only Massachusetts abstained from voting against it. Just three days later, Edmund Randolph proposed a new approach: allow state conventions to submit amendments for consideration in another general convention. "That amendments to the plan might be offered by the State Conventions, which should be submitted to and finally decided on by another general Convention." Yet this motion was rejected unanimously, signaling the deep reluctance among the framers to entertain such changes. After the Constitution was sent to the Confederation Congress, Anti-Federalists like Richard Henry Lee took up the fight for a Bill of Rights. Lee passionately argued for attaching amendments before sending the document to the states for ratification, saying, "To insist that it should go as it is without amendments is like presenting a hungry man 50 dishes and insisting he should eat all or none." Despite Lee’s fervent efforts, the Constitution was sent to the states without any amendments. 2. The Federalist Argument During the ratification debates, Federalists such as James Wilson, Tench Coxe, and Alexander Hamilton argued that listing specific rights could be redundant - or even dangerous - because it could imply that the government had powers beyond those explicitly granted. Wilson’s State House Yard Speech emphasized that the federal government could only exercise powers expressly delegated to it, making a Bill of Rights "superfluous and absurd." "Every thing which is not given, is reserved. This distinction being recognized, will furnish an answer to those who think the omission of a bill of rights, a defect in the proposed Constitution: for it would have been superfluous and absurd to have stipulated with a federal body of our own creation, that we should enjoy those privileges, of which we are not divested either by the intention or the act, that has brought that body into existence." In other words, the federal government would only be authorized to exercise those powers delegated to it in the constitution. In that structure, why add a declaration, Wilson's argument suggested, that the government is not authorized to do what it's already not delegated a power to do in the first place? Learn more about this essential history they don’t teach in government schools. Podcast - Bill of Rights: 5 Hidden Truths They Never Teach Article - Bill of Rights: Forgotten Role of the 10th Amendment in Its Creation As Tench Coxe explained: "The old federal Constitution contained many of the same things, which from error or disingenuousness are urged against the new one. Neither of them have a bill of rights, nor does either notice the liberty of the press, because they are already provided for by the State Constitutions; and relating only to personal rights, they could not be mentioned in a contract among sovereign states." Coxe provided an example, by pointing out that "there is nothing in the new constitution to prevent a trial by jury." In Federalist 84, Hamilton famously warned that listing rights could imply that any unlisted rights were unprotected, a dangerous precedent. "I go further and affirm that bills of rights, in the sense and to the extent in which they are contended for, are not only unnecessary in the proposed Constitution but would even be dangerous. They would contain various exceptions to powers not granted; and, on this very account, would afford a colorable pretext to claim more than were granted." He continued, citing a lack of power over the freedom of the press as an example of something not delegated to the federal government in the constitution, and thus, unnecessary to include in a bill of rights. "For why declare that things shall not be done which there is no power to do? Why, for instance, should it be said that the liberty of the press shall not be restrained, when no power is given by which restrictions may be imposed?" Hamilton forcefully argued that under this structure of delegated and reserved powers, "the Constitution is itself, in every rational sense, and to every useful purpose, a bill of rights." 3. Anti-Federalist Rebuttals However, Anti-Federalists weren't convinced, not even close. In the weeks following the Philadelphia Convention, George Mason’s objections were widely circulated. His first and foremost concern was “There is no Declaration of Rights.” A week after James Wilson’s speech dismissing the need for a Bill of Rights, the Federal Farmer published his fourth essay. In it, he directly challenged the Federalist claim that explicit protections were unnecessary under the Constitution's system of delegated and reserved powers. “It is said, that when the people make a constitution, and delegate powers, that all powers not delegated by them to those who govern, is reserved in the people.” After restating the Federalist argument, Federal Farmer drew attention to how this principle was already implemented under the Articles of Confederation, where Article II explicitly reserved rights and powers to the states. The new Constitution lacked such an express reservation, raising concerns that this safeguard was being deliberately abandoned. “And that the people, in the present case, have reserved in themselves, and in there state governments, every right and power not expressly given by the federal constitution to those who shall administer the national government.” Federal Farmer then argued that Wilson’s explanation of delegated and reserved powers was not an objective truth. Instead, politicians - then and now - tend to adopt whichever view best serves their political goals. This ambiguity makes explicit protections all the more necessary to prevent abuse. “It is said, on the other hand, that the people, when they make a constitution, yield all power not expressly reserved to themselves. The truth is, in either case, it is mere matter of opinion, and men usually take either side of the argument, as will best answer their purposes.” He then closed with the central warning: governments inevitably seek to expand their own power, especially in areas where the limits of authority are unclear. To counteract this tendency, Federal Farmer insisted that wise constitution-makers explicitly define how powers are delegated and reserved. “But the general presumption being, that men who govern, will, in doubtful cases, construe laws and constitutions most favorably for increasing their own powers; all wise and prudent people, in forming constitutions, have drawn the line, and carefully described the powers parted with and the powers reserved.” In the Virginia Ratifying Convention, Patrick Henry argued that this federalist view of delegated and reserved powers was novel - because it had always been the other way around. "I repeat, that all nations have adopted this construction - That all rights not expressly and unequivocally reserved to the people, are impliedly and incidentally relinquished to rulers; as necessarily inseparable from the delegated powers. It is so in Great-Britain: For every possible right which is not reserved to the people by some express provision or compact, is within the King's prerogative." For Patrick Henry and many other Anti-Federalists, this new kind of system - without an express declaration - dangerously left the reservation of rights and powers to implication: "If you intend to reserve your unalienable rights, you must have the most express stipulation. For if implication be allowed, you are ousted of those rights. If the people do not think it necessary to reserve them, they will be supposed to be given up." A stark example from the Articles of Confederation - which was adopted during the fight with Great Britain - emphasized his point: unless the Constitution included a reservation of rights and powers as had been done under the Articles, the federal government would be far more prone to abuse of power. "How were the Congressional rights defined when the people of America united by a confederacy to defend their liberties and rights against the tyrannical attempts of Great-Britain? The States were not then contented with implied reservation. No, Mr. Chairman. It was expressly declared in our Confederation that every right was retained by the States respectively, which was not given up to the Government of the United States." JOIN TAC, SUPPORT LIBERTY! Let’s keep building the foundation! For as little as $2/month, help us take a stand for the Constitution and liberty - whether the government likes it, or not. (they don’t!) details here Responding to the idea that a bill of rights was "superfluous" and unnecessary because the nature of the Constitution was one of delegated and reserved powers, Richard Henry Lee agreed, with an important caveat. He noted that a bill of rights was "not necessary in the Confederation because it is expressly declared that no power should be exercised, but such as is expressly given." Here, Lee was referencing Article II of the Articles of Confederation, the precursor to the 10th Amendment. "Each state retains its sovereignty, freedom and independence, and every Power, Jurisdiction and right, which is not by this confederation expressly delegated to the United States, in Congress assembled." Clear language about delegated and reserved powers so "no constructive power can be exercised," Lee noted, was the fundamental principle at hand. He said preventing such misconstruction of power "is the great use of a bill of rights." In short, Richard Henry Lee took a position similar to that of Alexander Hamilton. As long as it was expressly declared that the powers delegated were the limit of powers that could be exercised, then the entire document - or just Article II of the Articles of Confederation - could function as a "bill of rights." Thus, a full Bill of Rights wasn’t even needed under the Articles of Confederation because it was spelled out that what wasn’t delegated, was reserved. The 10th For much of the ratification process, Federalists insisted that the Constitution be approved or rejected in its entirety, vehemently rejecting any suggestions for amendments. This stance quickly changed when it became clear that Massachusetts would likely vote against ratification. A loss there – Federalists understood – would send them reeling in states where it was expected to be a very close call at best – like New York and Virginia. In other words, the entire proposal was close to being doomed. That was when Federalists made a deal with two powerful, but mostly silent, likely opponents - John Hancock and Samuel Adams: Support the Constitution if the ratification included a number of recommended amendments. On Feb. 6, they did just that, and the very first recommended amendment was a precursor to the 10th Amendment. “First. That it be explicitly declared, that all powers not expressly delegated by the aforesaid Constitution are reserved to the several states, to be by them exercised.” This language was crucial in addressing Anti-Federalist fears that the Constitution would lead to unchecked federal power. South Carolina quickly followed their lead with a similar recommended amendment “This Convention doth also declare that no Section or paragraph of the said Constitution warrants a Construction that the states do not retain every power not expressly relinquished by them and vested in the General Government of the Union.” And on June 21, New Hampshire sealed the deal in favor of ratification by also including as their first recommended amendment the same precursor to the 10th Amendment from Massachusetts. Virginia, and then New York both followed suit, also with precursors to the 10th prominently included in their lists of recommended amendments. In the end, the debate over a bill of rights - and ratification itself - boiled down to an explicit line in the sand between delegated and reserved powers. It’s no wonder that Thomas Jefferson, who repeatedly approved of “the plan of Massachusetts,” later called the 10th Amendment “the foundation of the Constitution.” And it’s no wonder why government-run schools rarely teach these foundational principles  and views - they’re a huge part of the system that has given us the biggest government in history. But TAC has you covered - and nothing helps us reach and teach more and more people with this kind of essential historical information - more than the financial faith and support of our members. JOIN US TODAY! Here’s the link, you know what to do: https://tenthamendmentcenter.com/members/ Brick-by-brick. Person-by-person. Building a strong foundation for liberty – whether the government happens to like it, or not. (they definitely do not)

Kenya MassResistance!

 

MassResistance helping Kenya Christians train young people across the country to resist the LGBT agenda

Swarm of foreign-funded LGBT activist groups descending on Kenya to recruit youth and change the culture

First 3-day course for 80 students to take place on Dec. 17-19 in Nairobi

December 15, 2024

 The Kenya MassResistance group of Christians are determined to protect the youth from this agenda and are not at all intimidated.

MassResistance is helping Christians in Kenya fight the LGBT invasion of their country that’s targeting young children and teenagers. A dynamic Kenya MassResistance chapter has hit the ground running!

MassResistance has created a thorough three-day course for them on resisting the LGBT agenda in Kenya. Approximately 80 high school and college students in Nairobi will be taking the course this week, December 17-19. (See flyer below.) More trainings are planned across the country.

In February 2024, as we reported, MassResistance helped a pro-family group in Ghana set up anti-LGBT clubs in secondary schools there to counteract the LGBT insurgency. The Kenya project will reach even further!

On December 4, 2024, we were contacted by a prominent pastor in Nairobi. He is part of a group of pastors, schoolteachers, and others seeking our help. “Many poor youths are being lured into perversion with so much money (from foreign countries) and the promise of a good lifestyle,” he wrote. “As a pastor I seek your partnership to launch a campaign in the high schools, since much recruitment into LGBTQ takes place in high schools. My church is currently conducting some programs in the schools nearby, which makes it easy.”

The foreign LGBT invasion of Kenya

Homosexual behavior is illegal in Kenya according to the country’s constitution. But officials have been caving in to pressure.

In February 2023, the Kenya Supreme Court ruled that the National Gay and Lesbian Human Rights Commission (NGLHRC) must be allowed to officially register as a non-governmental organization (NGO). This ruling gave it legal recognition to openly engage in a range of activities and promotions in Kenya. That ruling shocked the country’s Christian community.

NGLHRC was founded by a group of pro-LGBT Kenyan lawyers to aggressively promote “equality and full inclusion” of LGBT “identities” and behaviors in Kenya. It engages mostly in strategic litigation, but also public advocacy, “training and civic education,” and other civic activism. According to the pastors we spoke with, it is funded by U.S.-based other Western organizations.

The vast foreign money coming into Kenya to implement the LGBTQ agenda and change the country’s culture is astounding, and similar to the situation in neighboring countries.

 Foreign funders of LGBT groups in Kenya. The Kenya MassResistance people have identified the major foreign funders of the LGBT invasion of Kenya. Several of these (such as Advocates for Youth) are also directly active in the U.S.

(Note also that the U.S. Deptartment of State also actively promotes “LGBTQI rights” in Kenya by helping coordinate funding and other support going into the country.)

Over twenty new "official" LGBT groups. The Kenya Supreme Court ruling opened the door for a flood of at least twenty additional foreign-funded LGBT advocacy groups gain official NGO recognition to push their agenda in Kenya.

It's quite frightening. These pro-LGBT groups in Kenya are strategically organized and funded (with full-time staff) to target the Kenyan people and society from different directions. Here is a sample of what these groups do:

• Target schools and sports organizations where youth congregate
• Support (and litigate on behalf of) homosexual prostitution
• Lobby public officials
• Distribute condoms, lubricant, and other homosexual sex paraphernalia
• Put on public “LGBT” events
• Produce propaganda campaigns
• Establish LGBT “safe zones”
• One group even advertises “Offering training on how to have anal sex without pain”

 Besides the groups described above, the Kenya MassResistance people have identified groups that indirectly promote the agenda using misleading "health" information and advocacy.

It’s particularly alarming, say the pastors, that these groups take advantage of the relative illiteracy in rural areas by pushing homosexual and gender ideology there (often using the infamous “gender unicorn”) to persuade and recruit children to accept those ideas and behaviors.

 This vile graphic for proselytizing children has been translated into several languages and is used around the world by the LGBT movement.

Kenya MassResistance emerges to fight back

The pastors’ group was already energized about equipping youth to resist and push back against the foreign-funded flood of LGBT propaganda and activism invading their country. It has now become the nucleus of Kenya MassResistance. Besides pastors, the full group includes schoolteachers, a school headmaster, a school coach, mental health professionals, and others. They are well-connected throughout Nairobi and other parts of the country.

As noted above, the first training will be a three-day session being held in Nairobi on December 17-19. About 80 high school and college students will be attending. It will be taught by pastors and teachers from local high schools.

 The flyer for the training has gone far!

MassResistance has created a detailed curriculum for this course. The topics include:

• The Definition of Sex v. Gender Ideology
• Common Myths/Arguments of the LGBT Agenda
• Causes of Homosexuality/Transgenderism
• Health Hazards of Homosexuality
• LGBT Groups in Kenya
• Kenya LGBT Tactics of Recruitment
• Ways of Countering the LGBT Agenda
• Strategies and Tactics for Resisting the Propaganda

There is a lot of excitement about this. Many parents have enthusiastically enrolled their children in the course. The word is getting around that the LGBT agenda is being confronted!

More across the country

The truth is a huge weapon – even against well-funded evil propaganda. Kenya MassResistance’s plan for 2025 is to hold more of these training sessions in Nairobi and other cities and villages across the country. And it won’t stop there, they say. The pastors also plan to regularly continue working with the students to reinforce the “spiritual nourishment” they need to continue the fight! There is a vigorous social media presence in the works, as well as additional in-person meetings to reinforce the effort.

And yes, becoming an official NGO in Kenya

The leaders are filing the paperwork to register Kenya MassResistance as an official NGO in Kenya. “We want to be right up front in this battle, not hiding,” they told us. It will also give them a great deal of latitude for public activism.

They say they have gotten a great response from the Christian community. “We’ll all be raising our voices in the streets,” they said.

Stay tuned: We will report again after the Dec. 17-19 training session!

   

Please help us continue to do our uncompromising work!

Our successes depend on people like you.

Donate to MassResistance

Your support will make the difference!