What the Heck, Unicorn?! "Repeal 377a is Not Enough!"

This cartoon is my latest clapback at the pro-LGBT propagandist/cartoonist Heckin' Unicorn.

When it comes to homosexuality and the LGBT agenda, the slippery slope is real.

Repeal of 377a is the first step in a much larger, destructive agenda.

How could the Singapore government not see this?

What the heck, unicorn?!

More Caving? Singapore Officials Unclear About Protection of Marriage

First, the Singapore government announces that they will repeal Section 377a, the section of the criminal code which sanctions indecent acts between men.

Then, in order to safeguard long-standing concerns about the protection of natural marriage, Prime Minister Lee Hsien Loong announced during the 2022 National Day Parade speech:

Hence even as we repeal s377A, we will uphold and safeguard the institution of marriage. Under the law, only marriages between one man and one woman are recognised in Singapore. Many national policies rely upon this definition of marriage – including public housing, education, adoption rules, advertising standards, film classification. The Government has no intention of changing the definition of marriage, nor these policies.

This measure does not inspire confidence. If homosexual conduct is acceptable, why shouldn't those individual actors agitate for the right to get married, to host a parade, and flaunt their gayness, as well? The notion that the Singapore government can "split the baby" so to speak, allowing for the repeal of Section 377a but at the same retain the natural definition of marriage, is asking for nothing but trouble.

However, as the law stands, this definition of marriage can be challenged on constitutional grounds in the courts, just like s377A has been challenged. This has indeed happened elsewhere. If one day such a challenge succeeds here, it could cause same sex marriages to become recognised in Singapore, and this would happen not because Parliament passed any such law, but as the result of a court judgement. Then, even if the majority of MPs opposed same sex marriage, Parliament may not be able to simply change the law to restore the status quo ante. Because to reverse the position, Parliament may have to amend the Constitution, and that would require a two-thirds majority.

It seems rather strange how judicial activism has become so prevalent throughout the Common Law, English-speaking world. Courts did not wield such outrageous authority in the past, yet jurisprudence in the Western World has stretched civil rights litigation to unfounded limits, and now judges are just creating new rights out of thin air.

The Singapore government should amend the Constitution to recognize marriage between one man and one woman, just as the Hungarian government had done a few years back.

But is that what the PAP-run government intends to do?

Minister of Law K Shanmugam appeared to throw cold water on that bold move:

In line with the move to repeal Section 377A (S377A) of the Penal Code, the law that criminalises gay sex, Singapore’s Constitution will be amended to ensure the right of Parliament to define marriage as being between a man and a woman, Law and Home Affairs Minister K. Shanmugam said on Monday (22 August).

The Parliament will move not to ensure the natural definition of marriage, but rather to ensure that only parliament can define marriage. That is not the same thing at all.

The Prime Minister said that the government would move to protect the natural definition of marriage. The Minister of Law moves away from the measure right away. What do we see here? More caving. The slipperly slope to normalize sexual perversion is real. This whole LGBT agenda does not stop with the decriminalizing of gross indecent acts between men. Inevitably, they will demand false marriage, fake adoption, and sexualized propaganda onto students and adults alike. This move will not end will for the Republic of Singapore.

The move is to guard against challenges in court on the definition of marriage, and is different from enshrining it in the Constitution, said Shanmugam in an interview with The Straits Times and Lianhe Zaobao.

It's really distressing how the government went from announcing the repeal of Section 377a to backing away from a full-force definition protecting the institution of marriage. What a shame. I fear that false marriage will become the law of the land in two years time, should the people of Singapore not push back on the government's misguided, inappropriate measure to repeal 377a.

Singapore LGBT Historian, "Repeal 377a" Plaintiff Roy Tan: Serial Sex Fiend

Roy Tan, Singapore's LGBT "Historian"

In a previous post, I reported on retired physician yet ongoing LGBT activist Roy Tan.

I pointed out from his own words in an interview with "Dear Straight People" that people are not born gay, and that the gay lifestyle is not about promoting life, but is destructive and dysfunctional, as well as outright deadly.

Then I saw this post on his Facebook page:

EEK. Indeed, scary.

The comments below in the Facebook post were also quite scary:

From this post, I am compelled to point out that Mr. Tan was not just sexually active, but let's state the truth plainly: he was a child molester! More than a zombie, but a real monster!

Does this seem harsh? Does this seem untenable?

Not at all. Consider his own words:

His attraction to the same gender grew stronger with age. By the time he started primary school, Roy was already busy experimenting with his male classmates.

His male classmates. More than one. How old were they? Were they one year younger? Two years younger? Five years younger?

Even if they were still the same age, it's still wrong. It's still abuse. It's still perversion.

And repealing 377A will cause this perversion to explode in Singapore's schools.

And check out his other statements on this:

"When I attended school from Primary 1 onwards, I always had a best friend in class which I would become strongly attracted to.

"We would proceed to explore each other’s bodies when the occasion was appropriate in a very innocent way, mainly out of curiosity. I had no inkling at the time that it was a sexual interaction."

"Exploring each other's bodies ..." Really. "In a very innocent way ..." taking off one's clothes? Touching one's genitals? This is innocent? Not at all. It's downright disgusting, and it's clearly abusive.

It's child molestation.

Again: How old were Roy's young "partners"? And what else did Roy do to them?

Tan continues:

As I progressed from primary to secondary school and then pre-university and National Service, my best friend would change but the intensity of the relationship and the love I felt was the same with each new, unique person.

The main problem about my relationships with my best friends was that even though we shared carnal pleasure, none of them identified as gay and they all got married to women later on in life.

"My best friends", Roy writes. How many? How old were they?

This is very disturbing.

No one wants to talk about the marked connection between homosexuality and pedophilia. But it must be brought out. Here's one study which draws out this very worrisome correlation.

Here's another.

And consider this report by Bryan Fischer, as well.

And then notice the comments under Roy Tan's photo as a 13 year old (when he was already "experimenting" with other boys.

"You can see the shape of it too ... so fine" -- sadly, but most likely referring to Roy's genitals.

Then this remark:

"Pornographers. Aha!"

WHAT?!

More interesting than all of this ... those comments were deleted for some reason:

No more mention of pornographers. No mention of "You can see the shape of it."

I wonder why ...

Final Remarks

It's both worthwhile and proper for Singapore to maintain its statute criminalizing sodomy. The risks to children as well as to adults, the costs to individuals and society, the perverse effects on the country and the community cannot be overstated in regards to homosexuality, transgenderism, and other paraphilias.

The champion, the chief plaintiff in the lawsuits to repeal 377a, engaged in serial child abuse. He flaunts this sexual perversion as if it's something to be proud of. And it will become manifest and mainstream should 377a be repealed.

The correlations of homosexuality, pornography, and pedophilia are too great to ignore. Singaporeans need to wake up and demand the full protection of the common good and public order. Expose Roy Tan, and #Keep377a