Showing posts with label charter schools. Show all posts
Showing posts with label charter schools. Show all posts

Saturday, February 16, 2019

LAUSD Strike: Who's the Big Winner Now That the Strike is Settled?

This strike is a bunch of thieves and bums rushing to make their mark and make off with the most money from us taxpayers, but the ones paying the highest price are the students.

Or are they?

The strike has now ended, and it's been about three weeks since the settlement was passed and agreed to be all parties concerned.

Who are the big winners? The big losers?

A week ago, Los Angeles schools Supt. Austin Beutner went to Sacramento to nail down support for the school district if teachers decided to go on strike.

He came back sounding very optimistic that lawmakers understood the district’s finances were so perilous that it could not afford what the teachers were demanding.

Unions do not care whether there is enough money or not. They will always claim that the leadership, the administrators are holding out on the teachers and the students. They can make the argument that the school board members and upper-level staff are paying themselves big money, while so little money and talent is going to the classroom.

But the images of teachers marching in the rain, often cheered by parents and students, have amounted to powerful politics in this blue state, and have weakened the district’s hand.

The unions still wield an incredible amount of power in California, even post-Janus. Most of the teachers don't know anything but union representation and support. They can't imagine a career without the union representing them.

The teachers have told personal stories that many find hard to argue with: that too many students shouldn’t be crowded into classes, that schools should have nurses on hand every day. And that has up to now trumped Beutner’s grim financial diagnosis, even though it was largely endorsed by a county oversight agency.

The Los Angeles County Office of Education has signaled that the fiscal problems in LAUSD are immense. If the district doesn't get a hold on its finances, the district will go insolvent and the county office will have to take over.

Now, some lawmakers Beutner met with less than a week ago have scheduled a news conference Friday “in support of teachers and families to demand that LAUSD negotiate fairly.”

As the L.A. teachers’ strike enters its fifth day and a new round of negotiations begin, two realities are emerging: The tremendous enthusiasm over the walkout and the toll its taking on the school system.

This report had gone out during the strike. Looking back three weeks later, the teachers didn't get concrete gains, but some promises. They are going to get pay increases retroactive to when the previous contract had ended. The district is already drowning in debt, but they have still agreed to higher salaries, more support staff, and a promise to deliver smaller class sizes and less testing.

Of course, promises are just words. Where's the action to back up these promises?

Inside campuses, skeleton crews of supervisors, subs and remaining workers have herded students into large spaces, showing movies and plugging students into online coursework. About two-thirds did not show up, even though many working parents depend on schools to provide childcare and even meals.

To add financial insult to injury, the district lost hundreds of millions of dollars over the week of strikes.

The district estimates that each day of the strike is costing $10 million to $15 million, and Thursday’s student attendance was the lowest during the strike.
Garcetti's Presidential Bid
Has Gone Up in Flames


L.A. Mayor Eric Garcetti, whose possible entry into the 2020 presidential field has been challenged by the strike, is now trying to take a leadership role in ending it.

His leadership role pretty much sunk his election chances. Plus the fact that Kamala Harris has more name recognition and national presence than a mayor for a large city. Garcetti never really had a chance to begin with. 

This was evident Thursday when he hosted negotiating teams from the school district and union at City Hall. They were the first talks in a week.

“The mayor asked and received commitment for both parties to stay at the table until they reach an agreement,” said spokeswoman Andrea Garcia on Thursday. “Mayor Garcetti has cleared his schedule and is in regular contact with both parties and state leaders, including the governor.”

Let's not kid ourselves. Garcetti was hoping to get this strike out of the way as soon as possible. He was probably spending more time testing the waters with key special interests in Los Angeles and throughout the country to see what they had to say about his efforts as mayor. They probably gave him the by and large sense that they did not like his style or his substance.

I cannot recall the number of times people criticized Garcetti for giving into special interests and developers in the region. Some of his most vocal critics actually compared him to Donald Trump!

That was never going to help his bid for President. As the chief executive who ultimately had to balance budgets and provide public safety, he was alwasy going to run progressive activists the wrong way.

Given his possible presidential ambitions, the strike’s outcome needs to be a win, and preferably a quick win. Garcetti had paid limited attention to the nation’s second-largest school district until the labor unrest.

Gov. Gavin Newsom seemingly has much less at risk than Garcetti, but he, too has been pulled into the fray.

Thanks to higher tax revenues, his new budget proposal for the state delivers added funds that could contribute to a settlement. He also faces pressure from a key ally — teachers unions — to do something to control charter schools — either by increasing oversight over them or limiting their growth, or both.

The higher revenues or a smokescreen. The wealth is fleeing California, and fast. There is no way that they can continue to spend so much money on pensions and benefits for teachers, administrators, and the rest of the bloated support staff.

Politics around charters are tricky though; both unions and charter supporters are powerful special interests.

United Teachers Los Angeles, whose power in L.A. schools had been diminished by the rise of charter schools, seems to be on roll this week. But that might not last.

It won't. If parents cannot get their kids to attend good schools in Los Angeles, they will just move out of the area, or out of the state entirely.

Parents know what is best of their children

The organizing momentum has energized members. That’s especially important because a Supreme Court ruling last year made all union dues and fees optional. And, at this point, members can look forward to a deal that meets or exceeds reasonable expectations.

Union President Alex Caputo-Pearl has raised the expectations of his members — and their animus toward Beutner — to a fever pitch. And yet a final deal may look a lot like the district’s most recent offer in the key particulars.

Peripheral elements could prove crucial — like a pilot program using union-backed reforms. Tougher accountability for charter schools at the state level also would be something the union could sell as a win.

The length of the strike also matters, as does the unknown depth of public support. For Caputo-Pearl to win policy concessions on charters at the state level, timing could be everything.

The superintendent came into office last May on a divided vote, and the mixed loyalty is showing, too. Board President Monica Garcia has often been by Beutner’s side at news conferences this week. Others on the board have been less visible.

Board member George McKenna, who voted against hiring Beutner, called this week for an immediate settlement — and he seemed to be talking to Beutner more than to the union.

Scott Schmerelson, who also voted against Beutner, issued a statement openly siding with teachers, saying he could no longer accept that board members should present a united front.



Final Reflection

I am not sure that there are winners in this debacle, ultimately. Teachers are still overwhelmed with classes that have so many students in them. There is no assurance that proper leevel sof support staff will be hired to help the teachers and the students.

What about the students, anyway? Will they learn? Will Johnny be able to read? The failure of government education has become too great for parents to tolerate long-term mediocrity. They demand the best for their students, and Los Angeles Unified is simply not delivering.

The teachers are still not paid enough, illegal aliens are straining the system to its breaking point, special interests are calling all the shots, and kids are learning to hate this country more than to honor and respect the greatness that made the United States what it is.

Tuesday, December 6, 2016

How Donald Trump Can Make California Great Again

Election 2016 was great news for almost all Republicans.

We know about the blue states that went red. Wisconsin went from a sea of blue to a near red-state (except Madison and Milwaukee). Michigan is on the road to recovery, and red all over, too. In Pennsylvania, Democratic strongholds  like Erie County and the surrounding suburbs of Philadelphia County went Republican. States which stayed Democratic got redder, too. Minnesota was a near-win for Trump. A Republican Governor with a now ruby-red legislature will flip the Land of 10,000 flip into the GOP column in 2018. Illinois Republicans also made modest legislative gains. A new Republican Rust Belt strategy will pay future dividends. Globalist pressures, immigration, and anti-American trade deals are forcing conservatives to target the industrial core of America, long neglected by the think tanks.

But the Republican resurgence missed other deep-blue states like Rhode Island and Delaware. Hawaii’s lone GOP state senator succumbed to the Blue Hawaii syndrome. Aloha State Democrats now hold unanimous control in the state senate.

It was bad news in California, too, following modest gains in 2014. Democrats took back the state legislative supermajority. The final blow fell when Democrats flipped a state senate seat in the reliably Republican SoCal region of Diamond Bar. The California press—from the Sacramento Bee to the Los Angeles Times—have downplayed this progressive political restoration, claiming that Sacramento’s moderate Democrats will hold back the hyper-liberalism of their peers.

Yeah, sure!

The State Assembly Speaker Anthony Rendon (who represents cities with the lowest quality of life among cities nationwide) will enjoy a longer shelf-life (since reformed term limits extended his potential tenure to 12 years). He wants to focus on “Latinos.” What? The rest of Californians don’t matter?! Taxes are coming. Water is not. Labor unions rule, and uniformed voters drool. Anti-religious bigot state senator Ricardo Lara will take another crack at criminalizing Christianity.
California’s Liberals ruling class despises Trump, and demand secession. Should we be surprised? Progressives resemble the Confederates of 1860. They like their slaves (welfare-dependent and illegal), and they don’t want the federal government messing with their peculiar institution of “Government First, Individual Last.” If there is a secession, the 19 northeastern California counties that voted for Trump should form The State of Jefferson and call it a day.



But seriously, is there a silver lining for the Golden State?

Former Congressional candidate-turned-radio host Carl DeMaio (who ran on nearly every Democratic plank in 2014) discussed with libertarian Steven Greenhut the need for a robust opposition. They claim that Republicans are too focused on law-and-order issues. They need to be libertarian, fit their district. My assemblyman David Hadley checked off every box on their list … and still lost.

Should California Republicans just pull up stakes and leave? I met California transplants in Texas, but I’m not ready to leave, yet. After three weeks of reviewing California’s epic losses, I believe California can be saved. Trump’s most enthusiastic supporters—from Marco “Taco Trucks” Gutierrez to We the People Rising—all hail from California. Long Beach, CA is the seat for one of the most active national Trump contingents.

How can President Trump and Company Make California Great Again?

1. Voter ID. Voter fraud is the norm, not an anomaly, in California. CBS news investigator David Goldstein discovered dead people voting in Los Angeles County elections. In San Pedro, CA, an apartment received 83 ballots mailed to different people. The Democratic state legislature enacted automatic motor-voter registration, and the year before, California Democrats allowed illegal aliens to get drivers’ licenses.

Do you see the problems here?

California’s Secretary of State Alex Padilla (who denies the existence of voter fraud) allows people to register to vote online. California Republicans are mulling a lawsuit (finally!). I would like to see Attorney General Sessions sue the state of California for rampant voter irregularities. After all, voter fraud violates the civil rights of all Californians!

2. Labor reforms.  Big Labor buys politicians the way chefs buy meat at the butcher shop. Their domination in Sacramento ensures the progressive agenda for all, while taxpayers get to pay for it.
South Orange County teacher Rebecca Friedrichs sued California’s largest labor union—the California Teachers Association—because the coerced dues violated her First Amendment rights. Her case stalled before the Supreme Court following Justice Antonin Scalia’s untimely passing. Still, anti-forced unionism cases are advancing through federal courts. Trump appoints Super-Scalia, and forced unionism in California—plus the dues which fund the Democratic Party—is dead. (Trump should also sign the National Right-To-Work, sponsored by US Senator Rand Paul!)

3. Religious Freedom Restoration Initiatives. The churches across the country did not sit out Election 2016. Religious liberty faced extinction if Jezebel Hillary won the Presidency. Ricardo Lara’s SB 1146 woke up Christians even in Sodom-and-Gomorrah California. Conservatives need to tap into this momentum. California’s churches are alive and well, but need to get active. Donald Trump was the only Presidential candidate to suggest repeal of the nefarious Johnson amendment during the campaign. If Congress repeals this law, churches and pastors will reassert their freedom, then participate in politics and shape the culture.

4. A Donald Trump Presidency is ready to defund sanctuary cities. California has at least 35. Securing the borders and ending welfare to illegal aliens will remove California’s Democratic voter base while welcoming back taxpayers and middle-income families.

5. Expand School Choice and Defend Charter schools. Trump’s Department of Education nominee, Betsy DeVos, will take these reforms national. In California, parents and students have organized against corrupt, union-bought city councils which oppose school choice and impose moratoria on charter schools.

Californians can do their part, too, of course:

6. Repeal Prop 14. In 2008, California enacted Louisiana-style jungle primary. The result? Three quarters of Los Angeles Country residents have o Republican on their ballot, besides Donald Trump. Epic fail. It must be repealed.

Is this a tall order for California?


It would be YUGE! But with President Trump, Californians have nothing to lose!

Thursday, November 17, 2016

Gwen Posey Protects Charter Schools in Los Angeles

Gwendolyn Posey--a conservative, a Republican, and most importantly a school choice advocate, is running for LAUSD School Board this year.

Her stance in defense of charter schools is reason enough to put her on the school board of the second largest school district in the country.

We need Posey!

PLEASE contact her and show her your support (and donate to her campaign!)

Thank you, Dr. Hernandez, for getting the word out on Posey's accomplishments!


Press Release

Who:    LA School Board Candidate Gwendolyn Posey
What:   Stops LAUSD Work Force Housing Project
Where:  Sun Valley
When:   November 16, 2016 7:00AM
Contact: Gwendolyn Posey 818 794-0544

Los Angeles,

Gwendolyn Posey, a candidate for LAUSD Board District 6, in the North-East San Fernando Valley has been successful in reversing a proposed project for Work Force Housing on LAUSD property which had been pledged to a local Charter School.

The issue involves a two-acre vacant lot across the street from Sun Valley High School and North Valley Military Institute at 12105 Allegheny St, Sun Valley California.

What began as a community clean up where community members along with Posey worked together to clean the lot, ended in a very contested controversy over the future use of the property.

During the preparation for the cleanup, it was learned the property was owned by LAUSD.

Following the calls for future efforts to keep the lot clean, the current school board member submitted a resolution to the full LAUSD Board to look at development of “Work Force Housing” at the location.

Gwendolyn Posey learned the property had been previously pledged to the Charter School on two occasions.

Gwendolyn Posey Defends Charter Schools


Upon learning of the Work Force Housing Motion, Mrs. Posey mobilized community members and held meetings with the Board Member to stop the Work Force Housing Development and deliver the property to the School.

On November 15, 2016, the issue was on the Agenda of the Sun Valley Neighborhood Council.  The Council heard from Community Members, School Representatives as well as the Current Board Member and Staff.

A motion was passed by the council to urge the current board member to rescind her motion for work force housing and use the property for direct educational purposes only.

The Board member announced she would honor the councils request and advise the LAUSD Superintendent of her decision to rescind the motion.

The Council, community members and Mrs. Posey requested that the property be given to North Valley Military Institute as previously agreed upon and it be used for educational purposes whatever deemed needed by the school.

The member also stated, the property could be delivered to the Charter School by week’s end.


Mrs. Posey is thankful for the rapid and successful action taken by the Neighborhood Council, Community Members and the District.

Friday, November 4, 2016

Huntington Park City Council Discriminates Against Charter Schools--Supporters File Lawsuit

In a previous post, I identified a number of instances where the Huntington Park City Council discriminated against people who do not look like them, or who do not share their corrupt, perverse views


A group representing charter schools has sued the city of Huntington Park over its decision to impose a yearlong moratorium on new charters.

It's about time! That's all I can say.

This discrimination against students and parents who want charters schools, who want school choice, cannot go unchallenged.

This abuse of city power is just awful.

The suit, which was filed Thursday in Los Angeles County Superior Court, seeks to invalidate the restrictions that the Huntington Park City Council approved last month by a 4-1 vote.

There was only one city councilmember who had the courage and foresight to vote against this unreasonable, arbitrary moratorium:

Valentin Amezquita

The other four Corruptitos signed on for this unjust ordinance, in large part because the teachers unions are paying for their campaigns.



This is the ugliest, stupidest move yet by the Huntington Park City Council Majority, aside from their abusive, immoral, and illegal decision to appoint two illegal aliens to city commissions.

Charters are independently operated  and exempt from some rules that govern traditional campuses. Controversy has accompanied their rapid growth, even though they have proved popular with parents. The L.A. Unified School District, which serves Huntington Park, has more charters than any other school system nationwide.

"They have proved popular with parents."

Parents want was is best for their kids. The corrupt kids on the Huntington Park City Council do not have children.

No wonder they treat parents like trash, and the needs of their kids as unimportant.

“The city’s politically motivated and discriminatory prohibition of public charter schools, but no other educational institutions, for a full educational year conflicts with California’s policy of expanded educational choices,” states the complaint filed by the California Charter Schools Assn. “The moratorium therefore is void and unenforceable as a matter of law.”

YES! YES! YES!

The suit also contends that the city failed to conduct a mandatory environmental review or to provide legally required evidence to justify halting charter growth.

The only reviews which Karina Macias and Co. engage in ... all flow through the files of Efren "Puppet Master" Martinez.

City leaders approved the moratorium during a contentious meeting last month. Charter supporters pointed out local charters’ comparatively high test scores, cited individual success stories and criticized city leaders for standing in the way of a top-flight education for other families.

Charter schools are freed from the red tape, and held accountable for their results.

Traditional schools need to operate more like charter schools.

Charter critics argued that charters undermine traditional schools by attracting students who are easier and less expensive to educate.

And your point is ...?

The truth is, most traditional schools struggle with cost control because of the lack of competition and accountability. Traditional schools also have a perverse incentive to label students with "special needs" or "English as a Second Language," since they district will get more money.

The council expressed different concerns. City officials spoke of a “high number of inquiries and requests” for new charters and said the municipal code was “inadequate” for assessing and dealing with their effects.



BALONEY!

A city report cited “vehicle circulation, parking and noise” in areas where charter schools had opened, and said they could potentially affect “public health, safety, and welfare.”

It's called "community outreach" and "teamwork."

The moratorium also applies to existing charter schools that want to move and expand in new locations, according to City Manager Edgar Cisneros.

Unbelievable!

That is just criminal.

The charter association requested records of complaints, but the city has provided no documentation to date, said the association’s general counsel, Ricardo Soto.

Well, that is interesting, isn't it?

Association staffers have suggested political motivations. United Teachers Los Angeles, the local (and anti-charter) teachers union, donated $500 to the 2015 campaign of Councilman Jhonny Pineda, and the same union represents Mayor Graciela Ortiz in her day job as a school counselor.

WHAT?!

Conflict of interest: that's what we have here!

City officials could not be reached for comment Thursday.

Both pro-charter groups and teachers unions are major political donors in California.

An influx of students could be an issue because, unlike most traditional public schools, charters can readily accept students from anywhere, a potential problem in the densely packed southeast L.A. County city.

Oh, sure it's a problem (NOT!)

A Times analysis, however, shows that the number of students in schools with a Huntington Park address has decreased by about 1,800, to about 18,000, since L.A. Unified’s peak enrollment in the 2003-04 school year. Over that same period, the number of schools tripled, from 9 to 27, including six new L.A. Unified campuses and 11 charters.

The number of students has gone down, so there is no reason to worry about overcrowding. Why is th city council not coming clean about their true interests?

The impact on school-related traffic has been to disperse it across the city rather than concentrate it in a few places, which could raise objections in some areas, said Benjamin Feinberg, a math teacher at L.A. Unified’s Burbank Middle School in Highland Park. Feinberg, who used to teach at a charter in Huntington Park, analyzes local education-related data on his School Data Nerd blog.

Gary Painter, a professor in the Price School of Public Policy at USC, said it’s unusual for a city to adopt an emergency moratorium “for whatever reasons” against one type of land use, rather than relying on its regular process for managing development. He said he was not surprised by the lawsuit.

FINAL REFLECTION

The Huntington Park Corruptitos are learning the hard way that the power with the people is greater than the people in power.

Parents do not like elected officials trifling or limiting their kids' opportunities to learn.

They will not submit or cave to bullying tactics which prevent the future success of their families.

First they overcharge residents for civic engagements.

They cut staff and public services. Instead of fixing bits and pieces of the street system in Huntington Park, they decided to cut up and ruin every aspect of Pacific Boulevard.

They appointed two illegal aliens to city commissions.

They hand out lavish contracts to friends and political cronies.

They expand pot shops, even though the majority of residents in the city don't want marijuana sales in their city.



They celebrated a heretic homosexual claiming to be a priest, and the city was thinking about turning a house down the street into a shrine where the first "gay marriage" ceremony took place.

Now they want to block the construction and expansion of charter schools.

The Huntington Park Corruptitos have no idea what trouble they have stirred up now!


Friday, October 21, 2016

Union-Bought Huntington Park City Council Declares War on Charter Schools

For the past three city council meetings in Huntington Park, residents, parents, students, teachers have been filling up the Huntington Park City Council chambers.

Active residents--citizens!--have demanded that the city council rescind its moratorium on the construction and establishment of these differing and effective educational institutions.

Only this past week, at the October 18th, 2016 city council meeting, did it become clear why the city council was pushed to stop the expansion of the charter schools:

The four city councilmembers who voted for it are receiving big money from the LAUSD teachers union UTLA.

Once again, teachers unions expose that they are all about unions, and do not care about parents, teachers, or students.



It was particularly appalling to find teachers, with their communist red T-shirts, assaulting pro-charter forces in the city.



I recall the September 2016 meeting, where they hallways were lined with pro-charter protesters. Students were carrying signs that read "I love my charter school."





Students deserve a choice. They deserve the opportunity to get the best education possible -- as soon as possible. Lethargic school reforms will not permit young people the best learning. How long can these students wait?

Here are my comments to the Huntington Park City Council in September:



Parents of all backgrounds criticized the city council for this abusive decision.

The only city councilman to vote against the moratorium was Valentin Palos Amezquita, the same councilman who was removed from the chambers at the last meeting on October 4, 2016.

At this time, the Los Angeles County Public Integrity Division of the District Attorney's office deemed that the presiding officer had the right to remove Amezquita. But there are presumably other reasons for removing Valentin, like his opposition to the lawlessness and corruption of his colleagues.

They insist on handing out exorbitant contracts to their friends and political allies.

They have favored the perverse expansion of pot shops in the city.

Their connection to the pay-for-play Puppet Master Efren Martinez should alarm anyone who is paying attention in Huntington Park.

Just as a reminder: The four Corruptitos on the city council approved the expansion of Marijuana shops in Huntington Park, but won't permit more charter schools.

Talk about misplaced priorities.

The heated politics of Huntington Park has gone from bad to worse.

The council approved the appointment of two illegal aliens to city commissions.

They continue to raise operating fees and fines in the city.

The $300 million pension shortfall overshadowing the city's finances has not improved.

They continue to spend money they do not have, while basic city services remain non-existent. Community volunteers spend more time cleaning the city instead of public works. Other cities have adopted an anti-littering initiative. The same should apply in Huntington Park.

The city needs to be cleaned up, and it starts at the TOP!

I was impressed with the many parents and students who have stepped up over the past two months. Los Cuatro Corruptitos--Jhonny Pineda, Karina Macias, Marilyn Sanabria, and Graciela Ortiz--should not have reared their ugly agenda against schools. No matter how many union puppets invade the city council chambers, the parents will not stand for theirs students enduring an inferior education in Los Angeles Unified.

Now, some of the loudest supporters of the moratorium claim that education should not be treated as a business, but a right. However, the right to an education cannot ensure the best resources or the most qualified schools and teachers. Competition and choice create opportunity and accountability better than any kind of bureaucratic oversight.

Complaints have also surfaced that charter schools are using non-credentialed teachers who are not fingerprinted.

Yet in Los Angeles Unified, the teachers who have abused and molested their students already passed through those strictures, and yet nothing was done about them. Swift action in response to corruption, abuse, and incompetence is far more effective than all this paperwork.

Charter schools are held to a higher standard, and they strive to abide by those standards, because if they fail, then they get shut down. The same outcome should apply to "tradition schools." True competition forces schools and their supervising districts to provide a better, safer education.

It's as simple as that. By the way, how many reports have been released to demonstrate that charter schools routinely cover up and defend pervert teachers? None that I am aware of.




The Huntington Park City Council is wrong to stop charter school construction and expansion. The city residents have the power, and they flex their political muscle to remove the corrupt city council members, starting with Corruptita Karina Macias!