Mr. K. Shanmugam, the Minister of Law in Singapore, is charged with enforcing legislation, including the expansion of a law which forbids foreign influence in Singapore's politics.
And yet ... the country allowed a lesbian lawyer from India to visit and speak about their efforts to repeal the anti-sodomy law in their country.
And how convenient that this takes place at the same time that Singapore's courts are hearing three cases to determine whether the anti-sodomy law should be struck down as constitutional, as well.
And how convenient that this takes place at the same time that Singapore's courts are hearing three cases to determine whether the anti-sodomy law should be struck down as constitutional, as well.
Why would the Singapore government allow her into the country, since it is quite obvious that this woman is trying to push the same agenda in that country?
A number of pro-family groups and activists signalled their outrage, and they even sponsored a petition:
Following this, I posted the following open letter to the Minister:
In fact, I would militantly urge you to begin some degree of enforcement of this law, since sexual perversion, acts of gross indecency between men should be discouraged at all costs.
As an American, I can fully attest that the forced decriminalization of sodomy has created more problems in our country. In fact, we in the United States have a growing community of pro-family activists throughout disgusted with the advance of sexual perversion in the name of "Love is Love." From shameful gay "pride" parades to the spread of venereal disease, broken homes, advanced mental illness, the breakdown of civic bonds in many cities--the push to normalize LGBT has simply allowed the abnormal to dictate and demean what is good and right.
Mr. Shanmugam, would you please explain to me why you are so determined to placate a small group of sexual deviants instead of honoring the public good and natural law?
Mr. Shanmugam, why are you so determined to undermine the rule of law and the public good, all in the name of "social justice"?
Why would any nation want to treat mental illness as a civil right?
Your Forefather Lee Kuan Yew intended an orderly society, one in which economic liberty with cultural restraint ensured blessings for the greatest number. Why would you seek to undermine this?
For the love of God and all that is Good, maintain #377A.
Sincerely,
Arthur Schaper
Excellent post. I used to be checking constantly this weblog and I am impressed!
ReplyDeleteVery helpful information specially the remaining section :) I take
care of such information much. I used to be looking for this certain info for a
long time. Thank you and good luck.