Tuesday, April 10, 2012

New York Times Challenges Christie's Hudson Kill


New Jersey Governor Chris Christie is a large personality in a dwindling community of executives who say “No” to federal projects.

The projected Hudson rail tunnel that Christie killed would have cost the New Jersey taxpayers money that they did not have.  Taxpayers across the country do not need more subsidy-minded tax-and-spend politicians putting other people’s money where their mouth is. The New York Times, the White House, and the liberal cabal bankrupting this country should spend more time lauding executives who insist in spending less of other people’s money. Priding himself and his staff on putting money back in the hands of those who earn it, Christie has rightly asserted that he will not undermine his core principles.

The Government Accountability Budget Office ought to spend more time hyping the rising costs of ObamaCare. “Night of the Living Dead” U.S. Senator Frank Lautenberg ought to go back to the Big Government crypt that he crawled out of. Resurrecting his dismal record of public service in order to replace the ethically-challenged Robert Toricelli in 2002, Lautenberg has turned his seat in the Senate into a unjustifiable bully pulpit against a governor who better represents the needs off his statewide constituents more than his executive predecessor and current federal counterparts.

 New Jerseyans, and this country, need elitist legislators at the federal level to get out of our backyards and our state affairs and pay attention to cutting the unnecessary pork and entitlement programs eating away at our nation’s budget.

No comments:

Post a Comment