In 2015, five lawyers effectively twisted the marriage laws and perverted the Constitution in the Obergefell opinion. In doing so, the High Court set up a conundrum for future courts to decide: Do LGBTQ rights supersede First Amendment religious freedom rights? Nothing in the Obergefell decision created a right to get a marriage license from a specific person. David Moore and David Ermold could have gone to any number of area county clerks to get a license. But the two Davids refused to do so. They wanted to force Kim Davis to violate her deep faith by putting her name on their license. Only Kim’s humiliation and capitulation, and nothing else, would do for the two men who told GQ magazine they had never even discussed marriage before they heard about Kim Davis. But Kim was stuck between a rock and a hard place. When the Obergefell opinion came down on Friday, June 26, 2015, it did not rewrite Kentucky state law. ONLY the Kentucky legislature, not the Supreme Court, has the power to change state law. When Kim arrived at work on the Monday morning after the Obergefell decision, Kentucky provided no option for her to issue marriage licenses to same-sex couples. The Kentucky Senate President even wrote a brief, noting that Kim could have been criminally liable under Kentucky law had she begun issuing same-sex marriage licenses that day. But Kim’s dilemma wasn’t simply the state law. As a born-again Christian, Kim could not have her name as an official seal on something she sincerely believes is a violation of her faith. So, on the Monday morning following Obergefell, Kim wrote to Kentucky state officials seeking guidance on both the law and her right to religious accommodation. Kim did everything right but has been punished by the Courts (and the sham case of two men). The two Davids, who mercilessly set out to target Kim for her faith, will be financially rewarded for their hostile theatrics if Kim loses this case. Such a loss will have far-reaching ramifications. Defend religious freedom from the attacks of the LGBTQ agenda.
There are two major issues here the courts must resolve: - Kim was acting in her official role and in accordance with state law. Therefore, the only lawsuit the two Davids should have been allowed to pursue was against the State of Kentucky itself. But that lawsuit didn't work, so the two decided to sue Kim personally as punishment for not betraying her faith.
- Kim, in her individual capacity, has a First Amendment right to religious freedom as well as under Kentucky’s Religious Freedom Restoration Act that protects her sincerely held religious beliefs. Kim has protection ... unless the Courts decide that LGBTQ is a special protected class whose rights supersede and replace all other rights.
Our case will bring this matter to the courts to make that decision once and for all: Do Americans have equal rights, or do LGBTQ “rights” supersede everyone else’s rights? Kim’s case has the potential to overturn the Obergefell opinion that caused this mess. In its ruling, the Sixth Circuit Court admitted that this is a case of “first impression,” meaning that no other court has ruled on this matter. That means Liberty Counsel will once again create legal precedent that lasts for generations. Don’t let the LGBTQ agenda erase religious freedom. |
No comments:
Post a Comment