Thursday, May 8, 2014

Torrance City Council: Clint Paulson

Clint_Paulson_sized.jpg
Clint Paulson
City Council candidate Clint Paulson reached out to me a few days ago, and asked why I was interviewing certain candidates and not others.


I was willing to give Mr. Paulson another look, since he reached out to me. I was also impressed that he brought to voters' attention that the city had spent $100 k on a mailer to inform voters about the importance of the 2014 city election.
 
That money would have brought back the Wilson Park Fourth of July program! How much more waste is going on in the city of Torrance?
 
More is revealed.
 
Thank you, Mr. Paulson for reaching out to me.
 
 
1. Why are you running for city council this year? Did you ever plan on running for office before?
 
I believe we are in the midst of a significant sea change here in Torrance. We have been sailing along quite nicely for many years. The water, however, has become increasingly unsettled and unless we course correct quickly I believe the quality of life in Torrance will be significantly reduced. Toyota leaving is just the first wave. We can’t afford to elect leaders right now that are unwilling or unable to address the significant challenges we currently face. I wanted to run to try and effectuate change before it is too late. 
 
I have always wanted to run for office. I was very involved in student government in both high school and college and attended law school with an eye towards public service. Having babies and young children, not to mention a career, has kept me from being as involved as I would like in recent years, but now my kids are older and I am more able to turn my focus to community matters.
 
2. You are a registered Democrat (or what?). Why?
 
I am not a registered Democrat. In fact, I am not and have never been registered with any political party. I believe partisan politics is a leading contributor to much of the dysfunction we see in government today. I also believe my views do not nicely fit into one particular camp. I am a more complicated person than that. I also oppose the corrupting influence of money in politics and I believe the party system contributes significantly to that problem. 
 
3. Tell us about your prior professional/political experience and how they can help the City of Torrance?
 
I went to one of the top law schools in the country (the College of William and Mary) and I currently work in Government procurement in the aerospace industry. After law school, I received a Presidential Management Fellowship – which is prestigious program designed by the federal government to train future government leaders. As part of that fellowship, I worked with the U.S. Air Force where I also graduated from Squadron Officer School. I have since received a Graduate certificate in Government Contracts from UCLA and several professional distinctions in Contracts Management. I am the only candidate running that is a certified expert in government procurement. Approving government contracts is a large percentage of the nuts and bolts of being on City Council.
 
In late March, the City Council approved the purchase of two ambulances for the fire department in the amount of $410K. Mind you, the purpose of these ambulances is not to transport patients. The city already hires out to Gerber for the transport ambulances. Nonetheless, the fire department recommended basically the Mercedes of ambulances with all the bells and whistles you could possibly imagine. The staff report for this purchase indicated they would be bought sole-source (i.e. without pursuing competitive bids) because no other manufacturers could meet the safety requirements. Amazingly, nobody on the current council questioned this. I did some quick research and discovered you can purchase a quality ambulance that does not compromise safety in the slightest for roughly $140K. Had the city pursued a competitive bid for this purchase they could have saved nearly $130K on this one purchase alone. The city could actually have saved about $20 to 30K just by purchasing 2013 models versus the 2015’s the Fire Department recommended. Unfortunately for the taxpayer, the fire and police departments pretty much get everything they want in Torrance. Similar decisions to this are made nearly every single council meeting. As a procurement expert, I will work with the other members of the council to put an end to these wasteful spending practices. 
    
4. What measures, reforms, and policies would you implement on a city level to bring in more business and increase economic activity in the City of Torrance.
 
Check out my blog commentary on the exodus of Toyota at the site below for my thoughts on this topic
 
 
5. What concerns do you have about crime and public safety in Torrance?
 
Combating crime and maintaining public safety is something all the candidates agree on. We all recognize the challenges associated with AB-109 and the increase in residential burglaries. How I differ from the other candidates, however, is that I realize that we will never be able to implement the suggested solutions to this problem, such as the hiring of more police officers, unless we correct the significant spending issues the city faces. In light of this challenge, and many others like neglected roads and streets, I’m not sure that building a $4 Million dollar soccer complex on a leased piece of property whose term expires in 5 years should be at the top of our priority list. In the last few weeks alone, there has also been a lot of money wasted on such things as the unnecessary imposition of street sweeping signs and paying for putting up 300 AYSO banners on city streetlights. We need to fix our spending priorities if we really want to address public safety concerns. 
  
6. There are growing revelations about the city's massive pension liabilities -- $400 million, an online reports confirm that at least 600 city employees out of 200 are earning at least $100,000 a year in total compensation (per 2012 data). What reforms or steps do you support to deal with these massive pension liabilities?
 
Public employee pensions are at the top of the list when it comes to our spending concerns. Forecasts project that we will soon be paying $100k per year per public safety employee in pension costs alone. Except for new hires in the last few years, Torrance Public Safety employees do not contribute anything to their pension costs and they receive 90% of their highest/or final year salary after 30 years of service. That means they often retire in their early 50’s. The city is also on the hook for their medical benefits even after retirement. Think of that. I went to law school and have a respectable middle-class job in the aerospace industry. Right now, even with matching funds for my 401K contributions my employer pays less than $10k a year towards my retirement funds and provides no medical benefits upon retirement. Let’s also not forget that salaries for Torrance Public Safety employees are actually quite high when compared to the private sector. I truly don’t begrudge others that make more money than I do. Life is about choices and I made mine. I’m happy with where I am. That said, is it truly worth eliminating essential city services and facing possible bankruptcy so we can pay public safety employees nearly 10 times or more the equivalent retirement package of private sector taxpayers? I don’t think it is.
 
What truly bothers me about the pension dilemma is that the proposed solution thus far by our leaders is to make new hires contribute more to their pensions. Passing the buck like this doesn't really solve the problem and it also makes it harder for the next generation to make ends meet. Since when did we become a society that is willing to mortgage our children’s future? My grandma lived through the great depression and for much of her life lived primarily on something very meager like $1200 a month in social security. This despite spending a full career working at JC Penney. Knowing her, she would have given much of that meager social security check up if it meant helping her kids live a better life. Unfortunately, our society has become so clouded with greed that we have lost much of that perspective taught us by the great depression generation. It just seems wrongheaded to me to take away a benefit from our kids that we as parents are not willing to give up. Our kids shouldn’t have to pay the price for our reckless and greedy spending practices. If pensions are not an issue as some candidates would claim, then don't take benefits away from the upcoming generation. If they are an issue, then we need to start talking about imposing the same reductions on "classic" employees as those that are being forced upon new hires. That's a real solution to the problem versus the empty rhetoric I am becoming accustomed to hearing.               


There's an idea  -- require current employees to renegotiate their benefits. This problem cannot be solved by putting the burden only on new hires. Will the next city council actually summon the courage to do what is best for the city of Torrance. Candidates like Clint who refuse to run away from the serious pension liabilities and financial waste certainly will.


7. How have residents and prospective voters responded to your campaign? 
 
I think they are responding very well. The primary objective of my campaign is to get the money out of politics as I believe that is at the root of all bad political decisions. We are a seeing this right now in this campaign as a candidate for mayor received an independent expenditure in the amount of $25K from McKormick ambulance. These corrupting campaign contributions are causing our leaders to be beholden to certain special interest groups, like unions and developers, instead of the voters. I want to change that and that’s why I am the only candidate not accepting campaign donations from anyone. Period! I think the voters will respond very favorably to this message as they recognize how destructive to our democracy campaign donations have become.

Paulson communicates a researched, healthy concern about the pension and public safety issue, unlike other candidates who have contributed their answers to this blog. Because he refused to take anyone else's money to run a campaign, I recognize that he is not directly beholden to any one interest. Fine.

Yet it takes money to make one's case, even if for a city election. Can Clint make his case to Torrance voters?


He has made his case to this voter.

On June 3rd, I will be voting for Clint Paulson for Torrance City Council.


22 comments:

  1. Disgusting to see various Torrance candidates willfully appear on the blog of a supporter of the racist Donald Sterling--the same fringe blogger who engages in the character assassination of their fellow Torrance candidate who happens to be anti-war. Nice to see you idiots have leaned your right-wing talk radio lessons so well while exhibiting the craven stupidity of rookies acting like deer in the headlights.

    ReplyDelete
  2. Earl are you by any chance talking about Tim "Benedict Arnold" Goodrich? The candidate who in the mailer I received today states "US Air Force, 1999-2003 including 3 deployments in support of Iraq and Afghanistan" who then assaults the SUV carrying war hero General Franks as he visits a campus of LAUSD? Did you want to know if I can prove what I said? I'm glad you asked. Go to the 1:17 hour mark and watch your traitor in action. http://www.c-span.org/video/?187909-1/opposition-war-iraq-rally Getting back on subject, Clint Paulson is certainly somebody to think about. He is certainly now in the mix of the candidates that I have to choose from. Thanks Arthur. Since my absentee ballot has arrived are there some more candidates you will vet?

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Thanks Claude, for punching back twice as hard. Earl doesn't know who his father is, and that is why he acts the way he does. When they have nothing to attack with, notice how they trick out the "Race card". Yawn.

      This Atwood fellow reposted the same post -- neither inventive nor competent.

      I have reached out to two other candidates. Still waiting. Still Waiting.

      Thanks again!

      Delete
    2. Art, that I reposted is "neither inventive nor competent"? No---that's your writing that you are thinking about. But I do find that interesting coming from a serial Twitter spammer whose account gets suspended because of it from time to time. Not very "inventive or competent". As for "Claude"? Ha! Who are you--Glenn Beck?

      Delete
  3. Protesting an unjust war? I'd call that a good, old-fashioned American family value--especially from a brave veteran such as Goodrich. Any other idiotic, armchair character assassinations with which you'd care to embarrass yourself, "Anonymous", or will you be going back to surfing the Internet for the latest fake far-right Benghazi meme?

    ReplyDelete
  4. BTW, "Anonymous", I notice you have no problem that this loony blogger supports a racist like Donald Sterling. Nor that these candidates seem to ignore that little fact, too. I guess you're just another Angry White Guy that is cool with all that, huh?

    ReplyDelete
  5. This is Clint. Hi Earl. Disgusting?? Really?? I just don't get it. You would condemn me solely because my views appear in an online blog run by a person whose political opinions you happen to disagree with. Should we now mandate the "Earl" rule that no political candidate may ever express their views through a medium that may hold opposing views. Should we preclude all liberals from ever appearing on Fox News? Should conservatives no longer be welcome on MSNBC? Just how far should we follow your reasoning?

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Earl has no reasoning, since he has nothing but "race card." I am quite impressed with your resume, Clint. I hope that this post and more to come will invite residents to thinking about who to vote for. I know that I am rethinking my votes at this time.

      Delete
    2. Thank you for allowing me to address your questions and giving me another medium to have my views heard. I appreciate it.

      Delete
    3. Clint, my point is that you cheapen yourselves by promoting your candidacies on the blog of a fringe sympathizer of a proven racist and character assassin. Please remember---Art Schaper is not a journalist...it's not like being interviewed in a legitimate setting. Art is just a local nut with an Internet connection. Is that so difficult for you to fathom, or are you just thin-skinned?

      Delete
  6. Clint, you are an amazing person. You and I are among the few that speak straight forward. We may not have the political speech down, but I think voters are tired of the politics as usual. I have been strong armed by the current administration and now it's time for voters to seek a fresh start, a new beginning. We need to cut the chains that connect us to current and past administrations. If the people want new blood, they can get their new blood come June 3rd. I would be honored to serve our city next to you.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. That's why I two of my city council votes will be for Aurelio and Clint. Two candidates who don't stick their heads in the sand like ol' Heidi. They are willing to take the bull by the horns and fix this pension mess that is just around the corner. I still could use some yard signs gentlemen. I could take Aurelio's that is just around the corner from my house in the city planter at Anza and Lee St.

      Delete
  7. Gee, Art, a quandry for a fringe conservative such as you. While I agree with Paulson regarding a tree ordinance, that flies directly in the face of your simplistic "small government" mantra (which comes to bear when you consistently conflate the Federal government with small city government, which we find to be hilarious). By definition, if a city government enacts a tree ordinance, then it is dictating to the individual. Again, I agree with the ordinance, but I'm not the one still playing with a Ronald Reagan bobblehead. Somewhere, the Gipper sheds zombie tears...

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. The founding fathers never intended the federal government to be as big as it is today. They understood with an overbearing federal government that individual liberty would be lost. That is why Thomas Jefferson wrote about 200 years ago "When the people fear their government you have tyranny and if the government feers the people you have liberty". Slowly people are realizing that we are closer to a dictatorship than we are to the republic that Franklin, Jefferson, Monroe, Washington etc. gave us. The federal government was intended to have limited powers and that is why the 9th. and 10th. Amendments are part of the Bill of Rights. So if the Gipper is crying it is because of the land of tyranny we are heading toward. Get a clue Earl or are you like all liberals a clueless baffoon?

      Delete
  8. Aurelio, Clint, and Claude:

    Earl Atwood aka Jack Charles is a serial spammer, hater, and left-wing instigator who is one of my Beliebers. He follows me around and adds to the credibility of my posts with his arbitrary "character assassinations". Mildly entertaining. . .and mildly entertaining!

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Art, I'll ask again--who is Jack Charles?

      Delete
    2. Arthur, Entertainment at it's best. I guess freedom of speech doesn't include your right to have a blog. If people don't like what you write, then why are they reading it?

      Delete
    3. You can always tell someone has identified the secret blog moniker. The first question in reply is always "Who is Jack Charles"? ZCyberdemon. Hee Hee Hee

      Delete
  9. Who the hell is Clint Paulson? Not somebody who has actually been involved in our community. Why would anybody vote for a guy who has never been involved in the city and cant raise any money? Moreover he has some serious ADHD. At one of the candidate forums, he couldn't even sit still in his chair. Constantly shuffling and moving. The guy is a spaz.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Spaz? That is so politically incorrect. It is a reference to people who suffer from cerebral palsy. My daughter has cerebral palsy. Do you hang out with Don Sterling? People like you disgust me.

      Delete
  10. This is Clint. I guess my campaign must be getting some traction. Otherwise naysayers like M. Hawk wouldn't be rearing their ugly heads. M. Hawk represents everything that is wrong with politics today. Too many voters equate money with credibility. I chose not to raise money because I'm taking a stand against money in politics - especially for a City Council race. Why should I take other people's money, when I can use my own? I also have been a youth sports coach for years and help out with Girl Scouts. Not to mention my family took in a foster child and have not received any funds from the state for doing so. I guess in some people's mind that is not community service, but in my opinion it is way more important than serving on some city commission.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Clint, I have to agree with Tabakian on this when he says we would be better served if the candidates took their donations and gave them to charity. I congradulate you on your integrity and trying to change local the funding of local races which don't pay diddly squat. Thank you for willing to spend the next 4 years on the city council for enumeration that doesn't even pay minimum wage. Scotto said earlier this year (I might be slightly off on the amounts but the concept is what counts) that he spend $275K in 2006 to defeat Mayor Dan Walker and Walker spend 3 times that amount. If politicians want to use their own money I have no problem with that. However, I do have a problem with crony capitalism and candidates willing to sell their soul so they can put "City Councilman" or "Mayor" in front of their name.

      Delete