Showing posts with label Bill Clinton. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Bill Clinton. Show all posts

Wednesday, December 5, 2018

Reflection on the Death of George Herbert Walker Bush


George Herbert Walker Bush has passed away, the latest President to serve only one term and the last one to serve in World War II. I am not saddened by his passing, although elements of his legacy are remarkable. He was the first President I recall from my childhood. Although I was born in 1980, and Ronald Reagan was the first President in my lifetime, I don’t remember the Gipper. I do remember George H.W. Bush from the outset of his administration, when he was sworn in as Reagan’s hopeful successor. In fact, in January 1989 I watched his inauguration ceremony along with the rest of my second-grade classmates.

What else comes to mind, however, when I think of the Elder President Bush? My Aunt Frannie from West Mifflin, Pennsylvania in late 1991, the last time that I visited her. She was irate in those days. Why? “Read my lips! No new taxes!” she griped to me. Next, she pointed out the rising taxes shrinking her already fixed retirement income. She later mentioned how every foreign-made car on the streets of Pittsburg (right down the valley from her home) put four Americans out of work. She probably would have voted for Trump if she were alive today, but she definitely hated Bush.

Another childhood memory: A group of protesters outside of my local post office were denouncing President Bush. “He is Nero-Minded!”, one pamphlet read. The demonstrators informed me more about this New World Order, an agenda troubles Americans even today. Our country should never surrender its unique place—and role—in a world fraught with tyranny and seduced by socialism. No doubt, Phyliss Schlafy was extremely dismissive of this so-called Republican, especially since he remained committed to promulgating the aggressive, interventionist foreign policy of the Kissinger era two decades before. Governments which fight wars for the few at the expense of the rest cannot continue.



Despite his rise to prominence with pro-America conservative Ronald Reagan, Bush remained vocally committed to the Globalism fantasy, the notion that nations should further cooperate, even submit their sovereignty to a larger global agency in the pursuit of world peace. The contradiction manifested itself so clearly when Bush posited a “New World Order” as a commitment to the rule of law, when such legal strictures require respect for individual nation-states, but certainly not to a global organization like the corrupt, feckless United Nations. Bush signed into law the legislative program which gave us Agenda 21 today. Bush was a civilized statist, to say the least, but a statist nonetheless.

His reticence on the world stage was not commendable, either, following the fall of the Berlin Wall, the downfall of the Soviet Union, and the whole Communist enterprise. Some middling conservatives and contrived moderate Republicans look to Bush’s effusive demeanor during that time with fondness. “It was good for President Bush not to rub this massive victory in Russia’s face,” they will claim. I could not disagree more. While our leaders should seek peace with all world leaders, Bush should have extensively commended his predecessor’s calm, dedicated resolve to consign communism to the ash-heap of history. If there was a new world order to celebrate, that was the time, an order where principled leaders fight for individual liberty at all costs and sanction those countries who don’t. To this day, I cry with joy recalling Berlins on both sides of the wall dancing, cheering, and knocking down that tyrannical blockade. President Bush should have welcomed those victories with greater acclaim.

The worst thing that Bush 41 did during his administration, though? He betrayed his base, the Reaganites who had swept into power a conservative revolution sixteen years in the making would see its reversal during his one-term troubles. “Read my lips: no new taxes!” Bush had triumphantly promised to great acclaim at the 1988 Republican National Committee Convention. Two years later, November 5th, 1990, Bush said to the voters “Kiss My Butt!” and signed into law a massive omnibus, riddled with tax increases, which in turn became “Pay Through the Nose”. The fact that the press and academy would praise “his courage” for raising taxes on the rest of us was just sickening. There is no courage when forcing other people to pay for your costs.

Despite his successful military leadership during Operation Desert Shield—later Operation Desert Storm—in Iraq, the recession which followed crippled Bush’s already waning re-election chances in 1992. He was the architect of his own undoing. The roaring Reagan Revolution economy wavered because of the tax increases. The supply-side economics which allowed individuals, including business owners and wealthy investors, to keep their money actually works. Bush the Big Government liberal Republican called such free market reforms “voodoo economics” in his frustrated bid for the Presidency in 1980. Bush was also a social liberal, comfortable with abortion and certainly non-committal when it came to natural marriage.



A Rockefeller Republican long after the liberal Governor of New York turned short-lived Vice President had passed away. Conservatism with conviction (not globalist accommodation) rescued the United States from moral and fiscal decline in 1980. That same resolve saved America with the election of President Donald Trump—and with it a final repudiation of Bush’s elitist statism. No wonder Bush voted for Hillary.

As expected, just as the legacy (liberal, anti-Trump) media gushed over the deceased “Republican” US Senator John McCain, so too they are tripping over themselves to celebrate George H. W. Bush. His private life, from his 73-year marriage to Barbara Pierce to the storied legacy of his political family succeeding on their own merits, deserves reflection and praise. His service to the United States during World War II was commendable, as he received the Distinguished Flying Cross for “bravery under fire”.  Let the media fawn all they please about President Bush, the dedicated family man and veteran. However, as President, the elder Bush was a failure whose disregard for his party’s principles and our country’s values were ill-placed in the White House.

Monday, February 5, 2018

Corey Stewart: Kaine Protects the Clintons, not the Citizens!


Arthur,
“This is dangerous territory, it disrespects law enforcement . . .”
That’s what Democrat Tim Kaine said when Congressional Republicans publicly released the Nunes’ Memo on Friday.
Instead of demanding a more thorough investigation in order to hold all corrupt DOJ and FBI officials accountable before the American people, Tim Kaine is defending Obama and Clinton’s actions.
Of course, you and I shouldn’t be surprised.  Tim Kaine was Hillary Clinton’s running mate in 2016.
The last thing he wants to do is shine a public spotlight on Obama and Hillary’s potential criminal activity.
Arthur, Kaine’s ties to the Clinton/Obama deep state are one of the many reasons why it’s critical for conservatives across the country to defeat rally together and join forces to defeat Tim Kaine in November.  
That’s why I’m writing to ask for your support.

 

The main reason to END DACA -- IMMEDIATELY -- is because it threatens the safety and security of the American people.
I believe the top priority of Congress should focus more on improving our own country and the lives of the American people instead of importing poverty and crime from other countries.
That's why, if elected to the U.S. Senate, I will stand with President Trump and oppose any and all efforts to pass DACA or any other type of blanket amnesty for illegal immigrants.
I'll fight to build the wall, secure our border, shut down so-called "sanctuary cities" end chain migration once and for all.
But I can't get to Washington without an army of grassroots patriots standing behind me.


Arthur, Tim Kaine is one of the most liberal Senators in Washington. 

The Hollywood big shots.
The high-powered lobbyists.
Corporate cronies.

They’re pouring MILLIONS into Tim Kaine’s multi-million-dollar war chest – gearing up to launch a vicious assault against me and my campaign.
They know I’m the only Republican who knows how to win in Virginia.

So they’re gunning for me with everything they’ve got.

That’s why I’m counting on your immediate support.



Arthur, I’ve only got 23 days left to collect the 10,000 signatures needed under Virginia law to place my name on the ballot as a candidate for U.S. Senate against liberal Democrat Tim Kaine.

But here’s where it gets complicated – and why I need your help.

My campaign can't just go out and gather 10,000 signatures in one busy parking lot on a Sunday afternoon in the suburbs of Virginia.

The 10,000 signatures must come from every part of the state with a minimum of 400 per Virginia's 11 Congressional Districts.

Not only that, but the establishment in both parties want to keep me off the ballot.

They’re certain to try every shenanigan and dirty trick in the book to achieve their goal.

Which is why my campaign had to set a goal of turning in 15,000 petitions to guarantee my name makes the ballot.

And based on our budget calculations, it’ll cost roughly $150,000 to run the type of effective program it’s going to take to ensure I meet the requirements to place my name on the ballot as a candidate for U.S. Senate.  

But Arthur, right now funds are low.
Dangerously low.
And without your support, I’m afraid we could fall short of reaching our goal and fully funding this program.



If that’s too much, please consider chipping in $25, $10 or $5.

Every dollar you contribute will go directly toward collecting the signatures needed to place my name on the ballot against liberal Democrat Tim Kaine this November.

All I’m asking is that you do all you can to help fund this important program.
Thank you in advance for your support.

Sincerely,

Corey Stewart
Republican for U.S. Senate (VA)

Monday, November 13, 2017

Clinton Buddy Sharifa Alkhateeb: "Sharia Is The Goal. Taqiyya Is The Method."

                        

This video comes from C-SPAN, recorded in 1989.

The plan for taking over the United States to become Islamic has been long in coming.

Muslim communities are taught to seek peace when their numbers are small, to demand defense when their numbers grow, and then to take over when their numbers are strong.

Check out this diligent Muslim, Sharifa Alkhateeb.

She did not mince words.

This radical Muslim announced her plan to make the entire United States of America Muslim.

What is this?

This is madness. This is evil.

Islam is a dangerous, destructive cult. There is no First Amendment protections for a cult which kills people and steals their property, all in the name of "God".

It's time to put aside all political correctness, and its time for us to stand our ground on this country's powerful, welcome Judeo-Christian heritage.

Monday, October 30, 2017

Hollyweird Spacey-ing Out: "House of Cards" Collapses

WOW!

That was fast!

First, Anthony Rapp comes forward about Kevin Spacey's sexual assault against him when he was only 14--and Spacey 26!



Then Spacey tries to space himself away apologizing for behavior he had committed when he was drunk, although he said that he was drunk at the time, so how would he know about it?


Then the outrage across social media went viral.



Check out how some of the media elitists tried to handle this:

Can you imagine a Hollywood elitist who tries to give himself a pass for sexual assault against a minor by playing the "I am gay" card?

Unreal.

Now, guess what?

The award-winning House of Cards program on Netflix has been cancelled:

Here is the full statement from Netflix:

Wow!

Justice is finally overtaking Tinseltown.

For decades, the regressive Left has been selling us anti-American messages, telling us to feel bad about ourselves because we were all hardworking Americans, or that we lived in the greatest country in the world.

Media elites, star athletes all believed that they had every right to shame us and belittle us, then make us pay for the privilege of letting them talk down to us.

Now they pay the price!

Friday, October 13, 2017

Judge Moore: Obama-Clinton Machine Have Declared Me Enemy #1


Arthur,

There are just over 8 weeks until the December 12 Special Election.

And as I told you recently, the Obama-Clinton Machine recently declared me "Enemy #1."

They're hoping to defeat me and use it as a national launching pad for their all-out war against Donald Trump and conservatives in 2018.

Arthur, that makes the December 12 Special Election about much more than just who will fill Attorney General Jeff Sessions' Senate seat.

The outcome of this election will not only set the tone for the 2018 mid-terms -- but it could determine whether or not conservatives pick up enough seats to kick out the establishment and get to work Draining the Swamp.

Furthermore, a victory on December 12 will embolden conservatives across the country to take a stand and run for office in 2018.

That's why I'm counting on the help and support of grassroots conservatives like you to step up and chip in a donation to help me fight back and win on December 12.


So Arthur, will you chip in a donation of $500, $250, $150, $100, $75, $50, $35 or $25 immediately to let me know you've got my back in this critical fight against the Obama-Clinton Machine?
Of course, if $500, $250, $150, $100, $75, $50, $35 or $25 is too much for you at this time, please consider chipping in $5, $10 or $15 to help me get my message out to as many voters as possible before December 12.

Your generous contribution will help my campaign pay for mailings, advertisements, yard signs, flyers and other costs associated with contacting voters across the great state of Alabama and fighting back against the liberal smears and attacks.

Arthur, the Democrats launched their first quarter million dollar ad campaign last week -- with MILLIONS more to follow.

They know their only hope is to bury me in an avalanche of nasty attacks in order to hide my opponent's radical, left-wing views from Alabama voters.

But if I can raise the resources to cut through the attacks and get the truth out to voters, I'm confident you and I can DEFEAT the Obama-Clinton Machine on December 12.

Arthur, you and I have defeated the odds before.

And I'm confident with your continued support, you and I can finish the job on December 12 and Drain the Swamp in Washington.


So won't you please chip in a donation to let me know you've got my back in this critical battle?

Thank you in advance for standing with me.

I appreciate your support.

Sincerely,
Judge Roy Moore

Tuesday, January 24, 2017

James Carville Was Right ... That The Democrats Are Toast, and Trump is Kicking Rump

In 2016, Democratic strategist James Carville (who incidentally enough is married to former Republican operative Mary Matalin) played up whatever political acumen and integrity he claimed to have (nil), and wrote another book called:



"We're Still Right, They're Still Wrong."

Carville was not original enough to write a new title, but merely modified the old one which had published twenty years ago, when Bill Clinton won re-election, in large part because Republicans failed to field a stronger candidate to challenge Bubba.

He also did not write this book--or any of his other books, it seems--by himself.

One has to wonder if Carville has any independent ideas. Does he believe that rehashing the same, tired progressive line is going to make any kind of difference?

That's what he thought. He had hoped to rally the Democratic base with his latest ghost-written tripe.

The progressive base of the Democratic Party, however, felt cheated. They wanted leadership which would fight for them, not the crony interests which have allowed Wall Street to profit at the expense of everyone else. Most day-to-day Democrats are Democrat just out of family tradition. They still care about their guns and their Bibles.

Obama mocked them in private, but pretended to be their champions in private. In spite of her public and private positions, Crooked Hillary never quite managed to hide her disdain for Americans.

Anyway ...

He made startling and pretty accurate points about what would happen to the Democratic Party if Trump was elected.

They would be relegated to a urban cores and a few states.

And that is exactly what has happened.

He was right ... about the Democratic Party's epic losses across the country in 2016. Trump has indeed turned the screws on Barack Obama's destructive agenda, and there's no looking back at this point.

If anyone wants a window into the abject and failing hubris of the Democratic Party, look no further than James Carville. This man is living in the Bill Clinton glory days. He forgets that Clinton had success only because of the Republican legislature which pushed back against socialized medicine and his corrupt, perverse behaviors as a person as well as former President.



Carville's book, printed in mid-2016, bellows the same lies that the Democratic Party has all the right answers, but simply struggles to explain them. The truth is, after eight years of Democratic progressive policies, the American people want something else. They don't want socialism. They don't want systemic, government induced poverty and economic stagnation. They don't want to see their culture and liberties ripped apart, or Main Street turning into another isolated thoroughfare of a University town.

How about letting people be free to live their own lives, free from the petty dictates of arrogant Ivy League professors masquerading as leaders? Wouldn't that be nice?

Throughout his book, Carville relies on specious arguments and spurious correlations, unable to look at other causes because he is determined to prove that Democrats have always been right, and Republicans are always, always wrong. The extremism and monomaniacal fatalism of Carville's further demonstrates how out of touch he has become.

How much the Democratic Party has detached from reality, and from the basic needs of Middle America.

LOL!

Let's not forget that Carville once declared that Democrats would rule for the next 40 more years. That book was published in 2009, and in 2010, Democrats lost all their gains in the House, and seven seats in the United States Senate.

In 2014, Democrats lost control of both chambers, and in 2016, Democrats have lost control of the entire federal government, along with complete loss of 25 statehouses, and face nothing but split chances in the rest of the country. They even lost Kentucky's house for the first time in a century.

Carville was right about Democrats' prospective chances. Their arrogance reached such a feverish pitch, it's not surprise that they got wiped out the way they did. Such overweening pride gets dashed every time, and the Democratic Party (with James Carville as cheerleader) has hit rock bottom.

Today, Trump is kicking rump, and there's nothing that Carville can do about it.

Forty more years? Nope.

They're still right? NOPE!

Destructive, communistic policies have hurt everyone in this country, and in states were true leadership has fought to shape the culture, Republicans are gaining ground once again.

Suck is up, buttercups! Mr. Carville, you're fired!

Thursday, December 22, 2016

How Conservatives Must Confront Arrogant Progressive Liberals: D'Souza v. Alex Jones

Conservatives need to understand that our ongoing fights with communistic elements, whether in the media or in public forums, is about a lot more than trying to change the minds of the leftists themselves. They are only interested in entertaining and audience and shaming their conservative, pro-liberty opponents.

This fact of modern political discourse is still lost on a lot of conservatives. Progressive radicals are bullies at their core. They are not interested in discussion. They are not even interested in any kind of an exchange of ideas. It's not about wisdom at all. It's about raw power, and silencing opponents, whether through shame or brute force.

Conservatives need to expose the shameful lies and abusive tactics of the left. When entering into a wide-range or public discussion about issues, every conservative needs to decide whether they are dealing with a true believer or a craven showman.

Ben Shapiro understood this distinction, and as a guest on Piers Morgan's CNN talk show, he demolished the British elitist before he could ask the first question.

Check out that stunning interview below:


You will notice that Shapiro invites Morgan to have a "rational discussion," knowing full well that the British propagandist was not interested in a reasonable discussion in the first place.

Now, let's look at how NOT to debate or discuss issues with raging progressive leftists.

Check out the hour long "discussion" between The Young Turks Host Cenk Uygur and Dinesh D'Souza:


Throughout this discussion, Cenk bullies and shames Dinesh. He has very little interest in discussion. Uygur just wanted to mock and shame his opponent. He made freuent personal attacks against the conservative panelist. He repeatedly reminded the audience that D'Souza had serve time following a conviction.

If anyone bothers to listen to the Young Turks spokesman, they will notice how often he characteristics D'Souza and the facts of his criminal case, as well as his political views, and also the history of the Democratic and Republican Parties.

Uygur refuses to answer uestions, refuses to respond to D'Souza ...

Refuses to debate.

It was never really about debating in the first place. The whole scene, including a large mass of Young Turks cheerleaders in the audience, was designed simply to humiliate Dinesh, and turn the mini-drama into further proof that conservatism is wrong and the Left, the liberal progressives are right.

What is the proper way to handle left-wing bullies? Conservatives need to recognize that a combative approach does not mean that ideas will not be shared. Confronting arrogant liberals and proving them wrong is easy and fun. They also need to encourage supporters to join them in making their case.

Conservatives have the inherent advantage. Our ideas are consistent with reality and correct. Therefore, an argument which reverts to facts will work in our best interest. Because liberals rely on contradictions which they refuse to face, exposing their errors, humilitating them essentially in front of a third party, is not hard to accomplish.

But setting terms of debate and ensuring conflict as a rule, playing to an audience, is essential.

Witness how Alex Jones of InfoWars handled Cenk Uygur at the Republican National Convention earlier this year:


Essentially, Alex Jones gave Cenk and his fellow Young Turks a taste of their own medicine.

He did not want for a staged and prepared debate, but confronted Uygur.

He asked the Young Turk about his "Hillary for Prison" T-shirts.

This is not just a plug for his products. He makes a strong assertion about the Democratic Presidential nominee. She is corrupt, and she belongs in prison. Will Cenk respond to this charge? Notice that Jones is not interested in trying to engage a placid discussion, but rather expose how the progressive "newscaster" is a mouthpiece for liberal ideas rather than a forum for discussing ideas.

In fact, the Progressive Left is not about discussion at all, never has been never will be. It's about power and force, it's about the employment of Saul Alinksy tactics to personalize, polarize, then demonize political opponents. Why? Because the left does not have any winning ideas worth debating! It's all identity politics and power differentials.

Notice that Roger Stone shows up, a conservative anchor who finally gets a few words in with Cenk. "You never gave me a chance to talk when I'm your show," chides Stone. At the same time, Jones takes out a Bill Clinton shirt with the word "Rape" underneath it. This attacks stirs up more anger from Cenk.

He is losing his cool. He is no longer the bully. He is the one getting bullied, because that's all that Cenk Uygur and his illiberal cohorts really do on their show. Then the argument gets heated. An audience of conference attendees joings around the two talk show hosts, and Uygur the control-freak loses his cool. He resorts to the only skills that he and other leftists possess: personal attacks.

It makes Cenk look really bad!

Then Ana Kasparian shows up and shouts "F--k" over and over again, trying to get Alex Jones' staffers of the stage. Now, all of this would have been easily settled if Cenk Uygur answered some of Stone and Jones' uestions. Notice at one point Alex invited Roger to come back and debate Cenk, but Cenk didn't want to debate!

The aftermath of this confrontation was interesting. Uygur tried to smooth out his terrible response:


It was awful. The fact that he had to explain himself--he automatically lost again!

Final Reflection

Cenk Uygur exposes to the world that Alex Jones and Roger Stones got completely under his skin, and under Ana Kasparian's skin too. That was ten more minutes of his broadcast taken from his left-wing rants. Cenk complains about their rants and insults. He also faulted Alex Jones and Roger Stone for not offering rational arguments and to have a reasonable discussion.

And yet, that’s exactly what the Young Turks do!

Win-Win for Alex Jones.

Take copious notes, and go forth and drive liberals crazy!



Saturday, September 10, 2016

Crooked Hillary Complains About the "Biased" Media

Hillary Clinton is raving about the Vast Right-Wing Conspiracy again.

Every time she lies, cheats, steals, peddles influences, defrauds the federal government, and basically ignores the rule of law, more media outlets expose her. Instead of embracing some semblance of honesty, she blames the press.

But wait!

The press has been promoting Hillary Clinton for President for the past four years.

The New York Times, both newspaper and magazine, have been dreaming about Hillary Clinton, the first woman President--if she wins.

And that is turning into a bigger "If" every day as Trump gains in the polls and  more undecided voters decide that she is the most corrupt person in modern memory to run for President.

Now, she claims that the mainstream media are not doing their job going after Donald Trump for his record, his rhetoric, or some other reason.

Basically, Hillary Clinton believes that the media, the press, the reporters are after her and trying to make her look bad in every way possible.

I want you to reread my comments above and let that sink in.

Of course, your first reaction should be to laugh out loud. There is no other candidate I know, besides Barack Obama, who has received one major boost after another from the press. The Washington Post is trying to get everyone else to leave her alone about the email scandals. They have done nothing to investigate the Clinton Cash connections.

Nothing.

The American People have to rely on private espionage from Julian Assange to get the real story behind Hillary Clinton, the Democratic Party, and the rank corruption of the wealthy, leftist political class to crown ueen Hillary

The press is not doing its job. They are not going after Hillary Clinton for all this corruption. They even give her a pass for all the offensive remarks she has made about minorities and toward Donald Trump supporters.

Yet Hillary Clinton's latest fundraising eblast depicts the Democratic nominee as the victim of an aggressive right-wing media frenzy.

Arthur --

The last few days have offered a concrete example of one major problem in this election: the trouble the media has in holding Trump accountable -- on his lies or what we now understand to be clearcut examples of corruption.

The trouble that the media is facing to hold Trump accountable.

Accountable for what? She talks about lies, but what has Trump lied about?

She could have listed examples of these fraudulent statements.

Instead, she talks about her corrupt Clinton Foundation:

Take, for example, the narrative around two foundations.


You've probably heard a lot about the Clinton Foundation in the past month. That's because dedicated teams of reporters from news outlets all over the country have devoted major time and resources to unearthing some examples of wrongdoing in the charity's past. And the grand total of all those investigations? Nothing but confirmation that the foundation does unassailable, lifesaving work in countries across the globe.

Ask the victims of the 2010 Haiti earthquakes.
. They don't agree with that view of the foundation.

On the other hand, you have the Trump Foundation. Back in 2013, they donated $25,000 to a committee associated with Pam Bondi’s re-election as Florida attorney general. At the time, Bondi's office was considering whether or not to join a lawsuit against Trump University. But after Bondi received that contribution, her office decided not to join the lawsuit. Bondi subsequently endorsed Trump's bid for president, then spoke at the Republican National Convention -- where she said Hillary Clinton should go to jail. Trump’s foundation also gave $100,000 to Citizens United to sue New York’s attorney general—after he’d started investigating Trump University.

So, two cases of an attorney general receiving a contribution.

But Donald Trump will be testifying about Trump University after the November Election. So it's not as if that story is going nowhere.

This is blockbuster stuff, Arthur -- but months after that story came out, there's been little sustained effort from the press to force Trump to address the charge that he bought off the top law enforcement official in Florida. And in the 59 days we have left in this election, we shouldn't expect such an effort to begin.

Holding Donald Trump accountable? And Hillary Clinton's email scandals are only getting worse. She was supposed to protect classified information on a secure server. Instead, she was looking at information and passing along confidential reconnaissance on a private server.

She also deleted tens of thousands of emails. She has been lying about her intelligence briefings. Her careless incompetence ended up costing the life of one CIA operative.

Plus the four Americans who died in Benghazi.

So holding Trump accountable is on our collective shoulders.

Collective shoulders? There she is, appealing to the socialist mentality again.

Responsibility is not a collective effort, but an individual one.

Where is Hillary Clinton's sense of responsibility for handling classified information, for telling the American public the truth about her health, her lack of a moral compass, and the constant enabling she engaged in as a lawyer and then First Lady for Governor then President Bill Clinton?

We're the team who has to give voters the information they need about the two candidates, and that means we’re going to have to hire enough organizers to blanket the country with volunteers and run ads on television and the internet often enough to make a real impression.

So we need 39 donations in your area to make sure we can reach the voters we’ll need -- will you make one of those donations right now?

Thank you.

Final Reflection

Hillary Clinton was expecting the pro-Hillary media frenzy to carry her over the top to November victory. She was expecting the identity politics of gender to make the difference and district people from her horrid record on foreign and domestic policy, or the fact that she has nothing to offer the American People other than her XX chromosomes.

A new diverse array of reporters, blogs, and media sites are exposed Crooked Hillary and investigating her abuse of power as a First Lady, U.S. Senator, then Secretary of State, and now Presidential candidate.

I cannot wait to see her cave even further.

The fact that she is decrying the "biased" media is a real joke, one exposing the desperation of a campaign that is sinking before the public's eyes, despite all the prodding and promotion of a left-wing vain-scream media looking to write a fitting narrative in line with their marginal preoccupations.