Showing posts with label media smears. Show all posts
Showing posts with label media smears. Show all posts

Monday, November 13, 2017

Judge Roy Moore: McConnell is Trying to Destroy Me

I knew it. I just knew it. Swamp Turtle Mitch McConnell knows that his days are numbered when Judge Roy Moore is elected to the United States Senate. That is why he is going to every length imaginable to stop the good judge from getting elected December 12.

His hand-picked candidate was fellow Swamp Thing Luther Strange, who refused to go on record opposing DACA. He has lobbyist connections which stretch back decades. It was a corrupt bargain which put him in place of Jeff Sessions in 2017, since then Governor Richard Bentley then had to step down following campaign violations--and the only reason why he had nominated Strange as then Attorney General was to throw him off any statewide investigation into Bentley's improprieties.

That has not worked out at all. Corruption ended up at an all time high, and the people of Alabama have had enough.

Judge Roy Moore is another Trump-like, anti-PC Fighter. We need him in the US Senate.




Friend,

It's sad but true. . .

According to sources, establishment Republicans are colluding with the Obama-Clinton Machine behind-the-scenes in a desperate effort to sabotage my campaign and keep me out of Washington.

Fake news reporter Chuck Todd of NBC even called out McConnell for attempting to sabotage my campaign -- referring to the recent attacks as an effort "orchestrated" by Mitch McConnell and his cronies.

Apparently Mitch McConnell and the establishment GOP would rather elect a radical pro-abortion Democrat than a conservative Christian as the next U.S. Senator from Alabama.

I've been abandoned by Washington's establishment Republicans with just four weeks left before Election Day.

I must be able to count on the support of God-fearing conservatives like you to help me defeat the forces of evil seeking to crush out and destroy our conservative movement -- starting with me on December 12.

So will you stand with me at this critical moment by chipping in a generous donation to my campaign?
The national DNC.

The Obama-Clinton Machine.

Billionaire George Soros and his army of radical left-wing foot soldiers.

And now Mitch McConnell, John McCain, Lindsey Graham and the establishment GOP -- the same Republicans who attempted to sabotage Donald Trump's campaign -- are gunning for me with everything they've got.
It's getting nasty.

And I'm it's only going to get worse the closer it gets to Election Day.

So won't you please stand with me at this critical moment by chipping in the maximum donation you can afford -- whether it's $2,000, $1,500, $1,000, $750, $500, $250, $150, $100, $75, $50, $35 or $25 -- to help me fight back and defeat McConnell and the Obama-Clinton Machine on December 12?

The good news is, national Tea Party and conservative leaders across the country are rallying behind me and my campaign.

In fact, my good friend, Congressman Steve King of Iowa, slammed the gaggle of anti-Trump Republican Senators attempting to gut me and my campaign behind the scenes:
But that's not all.

The good people of Alabama are smarter than the liberal media and the GOP establishment.

They know Mitch McConnell and his cronies dropped nearly $30 MILLION to defeat me during our hard-fought primary campaign.

But more importantly, voters understand the outcome of this election is about far more than Alabama.

The good people of Alabama know the outcome of this election could determine the future of our country.

And they're rising up in droves and rallying behind me, my family and my campaign.
That's why, if I can raise the resources to counter the filthy and disgusting attacks and get the truth out directly to voters across Alabama, I'm confident you and I can defeat McConnell and the Obama-Clinton Machine on December 12.

I need your support right now more than ever.

Stand with me at this critical moment by chipping in the maximum donation you can afford at once.<
Thank you in advance for all you do!
Sincerely,


Judge Roy Moore

Sunday, November 12, 2017

The Real Roy Moore Scandal: The Fearful Conservative Punditry Class

Judge Roy Moore was the victim of yet another media smear.

First, the Washington Post claimed that he had misused charity donations.

Now they are claiming that he had engaged in an illicit relationship with a minor. The timing of this story is suspect, certainly, and so is the source.



What has really saddened me, however, is that key conservative US Senators are now backing away from Judge Roy. Steve Daines and Mike Lee had endorsed him, and now they are retracting the endorsements. Pat Toomey of Pennsylvania has asked for Moore to step aside, too, even though there is no evidence of any crime.

The Washington Post published similar hit pieces against Candidate Trump during Election 2016, and even The "GrabberGate Tape" didn't stop him. He apologized, then sided with the five women abused by the Clinton Machine, then took down Hillary on Election Day.

What is the matter with these conservatives? Don't they have any backbone left? They stand behind their podiums or they write on their computers, and then they cut and run at the first sign of trouble.

Townhall.com has spent an inordinate amount of time reporting the allegations. How about reporting on them, too? Are they true? Has anyone bothered to look into them?

But before all of that, I want to go after the comments of one of Townhall.com's editors, Guy Benson. He is openly gay, thus he's pro-LGBT. Of course, he is going to have a significant problem with Judge Roy Moore.

Check out his initial remarks when Moore when the primary runoff in August:

I've never voted for a Democrat in my life, but Republicans sporadically tempt me to do so. Once the GOP nominated disgraced former judge Roy Moore to fill Jeff Sessions' Senate seat, I started to ponder -- as a thought experiment -- how I would vote in the upcoming special general election if I lived in Alabama.

Really? He would vote for a Democrat rather than Judge Roy?

Why?

He signals his disgust with Moore's stance to defend the Ten Commandments placed on display in a judicial building. Moore was removed from the bench a second time because he refused to comply with the gay marriage from the United States Supreme Court in 2015.

And your point is? The basic foundation for our political culture is the Decalogue. What's wrong with disregarding the abusive statutes which undermine our Constitutional government? There is nothing wrong with principled rebellion. The rule of law is based on the Judeo-Christian ethic, all of which connected to a regard for Divine Providence and His natural law. An unjust law is no law at all, and any statutes which insist on removing every mention of God and His Divine authority must be disregarded.

Yes, Judge Moore has also declared that homosexual conduct should be illegal. He has also shared that Muslims should not serve in Congress. I am not included to criminalize through legal statute homosexual conduct between consenting adults. These are destructive behaviors, no doubt, but I am not sure that the domain of the state should step into regulating these matters.

I do believe that the government should ensure the unity and primacy of the nuclear family. Gay marriage rulings do not do that. Furthermore, Islam should no longer be classified as a benign religion, but rather a dangerous, radical political cult, one which requires confrontation and exposure, not accommodation and acceptance.

Judge Roy is rough around the edges? Fine with me. We do not need politesse anymore in Washington. We need to fight for our culture and our country. There is no excuse for inching away from this conflict. Yet conservatives like Ben Shapiro, Guy Benson, and others seem more intent on making nice than doing right.

The idea that people should vote for a left-wing Marxist to represent the state of Alabama is just horrific to contemplate. But check out Guy's remarks again:

But for me personally, Moore is still a bridge too far.

WOW! That's original (Not!):
Of course, we all know that Corker was another swamp creature more interested in going after Trump than fighting the communist-leaning Democrats and upholding our constitutional government.

I'm a constitutional conservative who believes in limited government.  Moore picks and chooses which bits of the constitution he'll respect, and advocates Statist, big brother, bedroom-intruding policies.  

These statements are a bridge too far. He is looking for some way to justify his personal sexual preferences, which in turn were codified by judicial fiat through legal rulings which were in effect unconstitutional!

As a member of the LGBT community who doesn't feel compelled to prioritize "gay issues" above other major public policy questions, I can reconcile pulling the lever for candidates who favor a traditional definition of marriage, but who also represent my values on other important questions.  (I happen believe the cultural debate over same-sex marriage is moving toward obsolescence).  Moore's retrograde intolerance, by contrast, is appalling and disqualifying for me.  



It's not disqualifying for me. Not at all. In fact, I like that Moore is taking on and getting busy in fighting the culture wars. We need a political movement in Washington DC that will not just take power from Washington DC but fight to allow the Judeo-Christian culture to thrive again!

Call me selfish, but I could not justify voting for somebody who would have me incarcerated for who I am.  Call me myopic, but I could not justify voting for somebody who would rip families apart explicitly due to a parent's "inherent[ly] evil" sexuality.  

You are being selfish, Guy. Homosexuality is evil. People are not "Gay". It's a behavior, not a genetic component of one's identity. Simple as that. The behavior is intrinsically evil, and it's time for family leaders and parents to take a stance on this fact. 

Yet in spite of all this, Benson cannot run away from a fundamentally powerful reason why we need Judge Roy in DC:

Knocking him for correctly stating that our fundamental constitutional rights stem from God, not from government, is a telling misfire.  In this case, Moore echoed the explicit beliefs of our founding fathers, who spoke the "self-evident" truth that human beings are endowed by their Creator with certain unalienable rights. 

This profound truth is worth voting for, worth fighting for, land Roy Moore took this battle on and won on CNN against corrupt left-wing news anchor Chris Cuomo:



Now, where else have we seen the conservative punditry class cave or welch on Judge Roy Moore and run at the whiff of trouble?

Drudge Report has been pushing the scandalous information published in the New York Times and the Washington Post as high-profile reporting. Why? The Washington Post has become thoroughly discredited with its unhesitant bias. There is no reason to justify these reports as true.

I went back to the Drudge Report website today. Matt Drudge has printed nothing about the revelations that falsehoods upon falsehoods are being heaped on the report from the once-14 year old who now claims that Moore approached her inappropriately. The mother of this woman has discredited key parts of the story, too! Why haven't you linked about this information, Matt?

He's gay, and like many socially liberal types, they don't want these staunch conservatives carrying the day in any election. They would rather see him lose. Such a shame.

Then there's RedState.com, with its only Trump Derangement syndrome. They just won't acknowledge that Trump has done more for the conservative movement and cause, especially in regards to restoration of our rights coming from God and not from the state. Executive orders have reduced the prosecution and persecution power of the federal government to infringe on the natural rights of citizens.

The latest story on RedState focused on one poll after the Washington Post hit piece. Doug Jones is registered four points ahead of Moore, but the details of the latest poll outline that the Moore voters are more likely to vote for him. Why go out of the way to shame Moore and sham readers with the pretense that Moore is in big trouble? He's not.

Then there's NeverTrumper Jonah Goldberg. Wow, has this guy lost his edge or what? Check out his arrogant riposte to the outrage fomenting among Middle Americans fed up with the permanent Washington Political class:

My indictment of the elites — at least for the purposes of the point I want to make here — is not that they are too snobbish, it’s that they’re not snobbish enough. It’s not that they’re too powerful, it’s that they’ve gelded themselves. Conservatives used to mock leftists and liberals for being “prolier than thou.” Plagued with guilt over their economic privilege, lefty eggheads and politicians would pretend to be regular Joes, all in an effort to leach authenticity from the masses that they wanted to boss around for their own good.

This indictment based on class distinctions is precisely the problem, and it's come about because of encroaching left-wing dogma. It's time to stand up to this and not allow a permanent political class to dictate which rights we can enjoy, and which rights we have to give up. Appeals and fights for national sovereignty do not imply a devolution to abject populism.

Not at all--at least Goldberg has admitted that he is a snob, and now we understand his unfounded hatred for Trump.

But serious thinking is a thing in short supply these days. When I called for conservatives to disassociate themselves from Judge Roy Moore, the response from so many Bannonistas was depressing in its vacuity. 

The real vacuity is that Goldberg, another member of the conservative of the punditry class, does not want to acknowledge that a multi-millionaire reality TV star who went bankrupt yet bounced back has done more for the conservative movement than most of the editorial intelligentsia.

And then they see someone like Moore and conclude that the Republican Party brand might get dragged down. The truth is that he will be one fewer representative in Washington DC who will do just what he is told. He has no problem fighting against the political games on both sides of the aisle. We need more of that, not less.

Goldberg ultimately concludes that a rising resurgence of "fighter" has replaced the fight for conservatism. Those charges are unfounded. Roy Moore has made explicit statements on issues, sure, but his regard for Divine pre-eminence and natural law is consistent with constitutional rule. He brings back to the forefront the cultural issues which this country needs to fight for. The Judeo-Christian ethic is essential for the United States to stand strong, like a City on a Hill. Goldberg has not hid his disdain for Moore: Saving Roy Moore Isn’t Worth It.



Yes, he is.

So, what is it with these conservative pundits? Why are they getting all weak in the knees? Why do they cut and run or want to throw Judge Roy Moore under the bus so quickly?

They are NeverTrumpers, for the most part. They have no interest in getting their hands dirty, spilling their own metaphorical blood, if you will. In a previous editorial, shortly after Romney's 2012 loss, Goldberg was floating the idea that Republicans should not begin their meeting with a prayer to God in Jesus' name. Huh? How does running away from the Judeo-Christian heritage of this country do any good for Republicans or for the country? They are not principled conservatives, in the sense that they do not want to lose their lucrative careers and stance on the pundit and lecture circuit. They do not want to sacrifice their elite style and persona, either.

Judge Moore puts them to shame on many levels, as Jeremy Frichtel writes for Daily Wire

Moore stands only for principle and doing the right thing. Most Americans have a negative view of politicians because of McConnell and his ilk, and that is why we must rally around anyone the D.C. swamp opposes. Because that is the perfect litmus test for who will fight for all Americans, for liberty, for the Constitution, and not K-Street and D.C. politics.

It is for this reason that I have strongly endorsed Moore for the special election scheduled tomorrow, and urge anyone reading this in Alabama to go out and vote for him.

This kind of conviction is essential in today's politics, something that conservative groups and Republican elected officials have lacked for the last thirty years. If we want to stand up to the Saul Alinksy-ite hordes, we need to fight, not just spout of conservative pleasantries with nothing to show for it.

The conservative punditry class is indeed fearful, full of self-righteousness, still worried about the liberal mainstream media and the smears that tumble out of their presses to smear conservatives. They are part of an old guard of Republicans who have believed for decades that one day, the liberal media will let them sit at the Cool Kids Table--as long as they sacrifice their party's beliefs, betray their constituents, and just go along with the Potomac Two-Step in Washington DC.

Roy Moore will challenge all that, and I am hoping all the MOORE that he wins the US Senate race in December!

Saturday, November 11, 2017

Media Freefall Over Moore Smears

The liberal mainstream media could not stop themselves, could they?

All they needed was a hostile, salacious article about the abusive, nasty past of a prospective candidate, and that solved everything for them as they pushed their agenda.



So, the Washington Post throws up a very incriminating, disturbing article a few days ago--front page news, too!--that Judge Roy Moore dated "teenagers" and engaged in an inappropriate relationship with a 14-year old.

For the record, any sexual encounter with a minor is evil, wrong, immoral, unacceptable, and must be denounced and condemned.

Done.

Now, is there any truth at all to the allegations against Judge Roy?

Joel Pollak of Breitbart News submitted the following points during his interview with MSNBC:


This video is a slanted version, making it seem as though the editor is somehow defending sexual abuse with a minor.

This video shows more lies, and then the lies continue with the MSNBC.

The article listed four people claiming sexual issues with Moore.

But the headline at the outright challenges the truth of the contents within. The headline and main portions of the passage talk about "teenagers." Huh?

Three of the focused cases are individuals in their legal age. There is only case that would be legally troublesome for Moore.

Now, there is more information to suggest that this "one person" is just another political plant dishing up an unfounded hit piece against Moore:

There’s a claim spreading on social media that a reporter was taped while reportedly offering a woman $1000 to accuse Senate candidate Roy Moore of sexual improprieties.


The unconfirmed rumor, which seems to have originated from a former Secret Service agent, claims the woman taped the conversation she had with the reporter and sent copies to the Etowah Co. District Attorney and the FBI.

What else is coming up?

One of the other accusers worked for ... Hillary Clinton, specifically on her Presidential campaign:

One of the women who said Senate candidate Roy Moore pursued her while she was in high school worked for Hillary Clinton's campaign as a sign language interpreter, according to videos and documents posted online.

Well, well, well. Another political smear is beginning to unravel.


The Latest on Roy Moore, the GOP nominee for the Senate in Alabama (all times local):

9:05 p.m.

The lawyer for one of the women cited in The Washington Post's story about sexual misconduct by Senate candidate Roy Moore says it is "reprehensible that so many Alabama Republican officeholders" have rejected the evidence.

What evidence? That's the whole point? Where is the blue dress, so to speak?!

Check out the corrupt desperation of this Alabama newspaper:

It's as though this editor was desperate to put out something against Judge Roy Moore, so they rushed the headline into print without fact-checking or spell-checking.

Funny stuff!

There's more interesting news about all of this.



Reporters went into Alabama cities asking for any information about voter reaction to these intense allegations. The anti-Moore Intercept reluctantly reported:


Republican strategists in Alabama have for years heard rumors that Roy Moore had “women issues” —  but they were never able to get definitive proof.

Opposition researchers from Washington and from Strange’s campaign traveled to Moore’s hometown of Gadsden, Alabama, earlier this year, but were unable to confirm the rumors, the sources said.

After all these years, these opposition researchers found ... nothing.

Then suddenly ... SUDDENLY ... some lady comes forward about sexual abuse from over 30 years ago about an illicit relationship with a minor. Really?

Not buying it.

This video outlines the concerns with Corfman's story:



Why has the Left gone after Moore, but they say nothing about Harvey Weinstein and the rest of the Democratic Party for standing by their own predators, perverts, and pedophiles?

Exactly.

Check out this video, too, from ABC News based in Alabama:



The fact is that even the voters in the above video outline their disbelief. They don't trust the Washington Post article. Besides, the liberal mainstream media has lost so much credibility over the last year, with the countless, baseless attacks against President Trump and Republicans across the board.

More to the point, Democartic US Senator Robert Menendez is under indictment and on trial for massive public corruption, and the media refuse to report on it.

The double standard, the shady timing of these reports, the lack of substantive evidence, the questionable political leanings of the women making the charges--all of it casts further doubt on this trashy report.

There's more from the liberal press affirming that the voters of Alabama refuse to be taken for a ride with their lies:


Moore finds his defenders back home while the climate is less hospitable in Washington, where GOP senators, as well as the White House, have called on the conservative firebrand to drop out of the race if the report is true.

Of more than 15 Republican voters in Alabama interviewed by NBC News, none said their support for Moore would change.


Most said they didn't believe the allegations and some said even if they are true, that wouldn't sway their vote for him next month because they think Moore is a good man, should be forgiven and they could never bring themselves to vote for a Democrat anyway. Several attacked the media.



This is a complete media freefall, folks. Let's just hope that Moore rides through this hateful smearfest.