Showing posts with label teacher. Show all posts
Showing posts with label teacher. Show all posts

Saturday, July 30, 2022

Why Teachers Are Quitting the Teaching Profession (It's Not the Money)


Why are teachers quitting the teaching profession?

Is it the money? NOPE!

I can tell you first-hand, that all the money in the world would not entice me back into the classroom. A six-figure salary is not enough for me, even with all the benefits. 60 Minutes did a report on an innovative charter school in New York City, where the teachers received considerably generous salaries (yes, six figures), but the workload was beyond intense. They were expected to be on call for the students, the school, the parents, the support staff all throughout the week. It was almost as though the teachers did not have a life of their own.

That was the feedback from some of the teachers, at least.

Don't take my word for it. You can hear it from them:       

          


Recent studies have been released trying to figure out what teachers are quitting, and this report sheds some serious light on the issue:

REPORT: 615Midwestern Teachers Reveal Why They’re Really Leaving the Classroom

Data Contradicts Unions' Reasons for Shortage

Countless education advocates have spent the last few months warning of the approaching teacher shortage—myself included. Voices from the left have warned of every reason from low teacher pay to COVID-19 policy to parents at school board meetings, while closer colleagues of mine in the center and on the right have suggested a behavioral crisis.

 There will be a teacher shortage, certainly. But there will be a student shortage that will rival the teacher shortage, too. Parents don't want their kids to suffer in the crappy, decayed government school programs.

I set out to confirm a regional understanding of why so many teachers have announced their departure from Midwestern classrooms this year—either abandoning the field altogether or switching school districts.

Only K-12 teachers were invited to complete this seven question survey (three introductory questions with four content/core questions). Limiting factors via survey distribution and internal mechanisms functioned as an endeavor to keep the data safer from the taint of political advocacy—though I will admit there is no way to keep something like this sterile. Most likely, a different set of 615 qualified responders would yield a different result, therefore I only pose that this is the best data I could collect independently, at the current time.

 That's a pretty good cohort, though, so there's not too much to worry about.

Of the 682 total responses, only 615 qualified to participate in the survey. 67 of the responses answered question two, “What is the staff email assigned to you by the district you currently/previously worked in?” with an email address not verifiable as a school email.

Additionally, teachers were asked if they were leaving their position as a K-12 teacher and what Midwestern state (Iowa, Missouri, Minnesota, Wisconsin, Illinois, Indiana, Michigan, Ohio) they worked in. While the definition of what Midwestern means culturally is up for debate, this was a cultural region I had experience with—far more than either U.S. coastal corridor, for example.

Once past the initial three framing and introductory questions, four questions were presented to responders:

1. Given the reasons below, what is the largest reason you’re leaving your position?

Salary is insufficient

Student behavior is poor and left unchecked.

Progressive political activity (Diversity/Equity/Inclusion, Critical Race Theory, Gender Identity, etc.) required by administration.

Parental concerns with your classroom (Demands from parents about curriculum, instruction, etc.)

COVID-19 Policies

Safety concerns about school shootings

Lack of materials to teach effectively (self-financed classrooms, etc.)

Standardized Testing

Licensure Expiration or Professional Development requirements

Other

2. If salary were considered an ancillary reason, i.e. “I’m not being paid enough to deal with _______”, what would you suggest is the largest reason you’re leaving your classroom?

Student behavior is poor and left unchecked.

Progressive political activity (Diversity/Equity/Inclusion, Critical Race Theory, Gender Identity, etc.) required by administration.

Parental concerns with your classroom (Demands from parents about curriculum, instruction, etc.)

COVID-19 Policies

Safety concerns about school shootings

Lack of materials to teach effectively (self-financed classrooms, etc.)

Standardized Testing

Licensure Expiration or Professional Development requirements

Other

3. If the present administration could provide evidence that this specific problem is being dealt with satisfactorily, would you return to this classroom?

Yes, this year

Yes, after a year or more of proof

No

Not sure

Were you a member of a local or national teachers union at some point during the previous academic year?

Yes

No

Of the responders with salary as an included primary reason, 319 of the 615 responders listed student behavior as their biggest reason to leave the classroom, followed by 138 for “progressive political activity” and 134 for “salary is insufficient”.



When pay is listed as an ancillary reason in contribution to another factor, the numbers shift dramatically. 447 of 615 responders listed unchecked student behavior as their primary reason for leaving the classroom. 128 listed “progressive political activity”, while only nine listed parental harassment.

Students are getting away with all kinds of abusive behavior in the classroom. It's really bad.

In California, teachers are no longer allowed to remove students from a classroom for defiance. Can anyone imagine trying govern a classroom, when students know that there will be no repercussions for their misconduct? In Torrance Unified, where I live, one student told me that he had teachers who would "rage quit" frequently because of student outrages and abuses. He didn't fill in the blank on one issue, which was that mostly like the teacher did not have the authority to remove a student who was disruptive or disrespectful.

There is no way for a teacher to teach a classroom if the student does not respect the teacher. It's not going to work. In many cases, most teachers just give up on trying to teach real content, and instead the focus on pushing political activism. It makes them feel good, and it gives the students an outlet to act up. 

Given this, it’s beyond incredible that Randi Weingarten of the American Federation of Teachers and Becky Pringle of the National Education Association would cite Republicans’ and parents’ “politicization” of the classroom as the reason for the teacher shortage. It’s not even a secondary or tertiary issue—it’s forty-nine times less important to teachers than the behavioral crisis.

The "behavioral crisis" is precisely the way to put it. Parents are not disciplining their own children, and trial lawyers go to great lengths to intimidate school boards and administrators about discipline in the classroom. Add to this mess the proliferation of Critical Racist Theory, in which black and Hispanic students are taught to see themselves as perennial victims at the hand of white opppressors, and these kids can milk the system, act up any way they please, then shout "Racism!" if anyone tries to hold them accountable.

Furthermore, 356 of the 615 teachers reported that they were a member of a teachers union this previous year. It’s not just non-union teachers that are reporting these issues.

In other words, the teachers unions are not doing their jobs to protect the teachers! Wow, I am shocked-shocked!

I was surprised to see that only 21% of responders answered “yes” to returning to the classroom of the district if their complaints were reported to have been dealt with.

The numbers are that low, because there is no real hope that school districts wil implement effective policies to back up the teachers. They have seen "The Blob" that dominates school districts, in which the inertia of warring interest groups frustrates any meaningful reform.

In this first survey, I conclude that it’s reasonable (at the very least) to cast extreme doubt on union and education advocacy organizations claiming that pay and parental harassment are the primary issues for teachers leaving.

When salary is listed as a contributing factor, 93.35% of Midwestern teachers claim that their resignation is due to student behavior and progressive political activity required in their classrooms.

It's not about the money. It's just not. Time for politicians to stop lying to the public and stop demanding more money.

Personally, I had assumed that teacher licensure and professional developments would be a greater share of the responses.

One of the teachers who responded they were resigning due to fear of school shootings submitted their response May 25—the day after the Uvalde, Texas shooting.

One self-criticism of note is that I didn’t separate “Conservative/Republican education legislation” from “parental concerns.” Though the GOP legislative action was a direct derivative of parental distress beginning during the COVID-19 lockdowns, I should have split those. Also, I should have provided a text submission option for “If you selected ‘other’, why?” I’m rather curious as to what those responses represented.

I also should have added resignation options like, “I’ve reached retirement-age” and “inter-personal staff disagreements.” There are several others which come to mind; the options listed were found in a major publication (NPR, NEA, AFT, Chalkbeat, EdWeek, etc.) as a primary reason over the last 12 months.

True, there are other reasons why people call it quits, but the fact that teachers positively answered that student misconduct topped their reason for leaving, well that says it all.

Final Reflection

Teachers take a lot of crap, and the lack of power granted to teachers in the classroom is driving many of them out of the professional entirely. It's not enough to pay a teacher a good salary. They have to command the respect of the students, the parents, and the administrators. By and large, teachers are not getting the respect they need, let alone the respect they deserve, to run their classrooms. The fact that teachers unions are lying about the reasons for the teacher shortage proves the lack of respect they are getting from the very people who are supposed to be representing their interests in the first place!

Thursday, October 19, 2017

"You're Confrontational!" Yes, I Am (And I'm Not Changing That)

 When I was student-teaching, I could tell that I was not doing as well as I could have been doing.

I found that students were not as compliant as I had expected them to be. I would ask them to do basic activities and follow directions in class, and they would not.



One student, I will just refer to him as J.S., was deliberately defiant.

He would tell me "Shut up", and he gave me a hard time when I called his parents.

When it came to contacting his parents, of course, there was only his mother.

There was also his grandfather, and he basically covered for his grandson.

One day, I got fed up with the guy when he had told me "Shut up." I asked him to step outside, and he refused.

So, I called security and had the guy removed. This kid was really troubled. No family life, no structure at home, no discipline.

This was the environment I was thrown into when I was a student teacher.

Unbelievable. I told the mentor teacher that I am glad I got rid of him that day. "It felt so good!"

The mentor teacher lost his composure. "No! This is totally wrong."

Yet it was right. Leadership is about confrontation. It's about taking on bad actors and making sure that the right things take place.

Of course, I was eventually kicked out of that assignment.

The Second Credential director at Cal State Long Beach told me; "You're confrontational! I have letters from both of your mentor teachers."

OK.

At the time, I thought that being confrontational was a bad thing. I tried to back off on how I dealt with students, how I outlined my expectations, what steps I would take to ensure that everyone was able to learn as much as possible without constant interruption.

Even then, though, my second set of mentor teachers would talk about trying to avoid being "so confrontational."

Fast forward ten years ...

I look back on my whole student-teaching and then full-time teaching career.

It was pretty clear from the outset that I was in the wrong business, or the wrong profession, or whatever else anyone wants to call teaching nowadays. For many, it's not a career worth pursuing with any efficacy or dedication. For the most part, it has turned into a nightmare job, one which doesn't measure up to the hopes and expectations of young professionals seeking to make a difference.

I revisit my past in the education profession because of a recent discussion I had with a retired teacher, one who had worked out of Paramount Unified before everything just went to hell in the state of California.



He and I went back and forth talking about the demands placed on teachers to make the most of their time in the classroom. I mentioned to him that I quit teaching five years ago and now I work as a freelance journalist.

I am also an activist. I like getting in bad politicians' faces and holding people accountable.

That's called confrontation, and that's what it takes to make a difference in our state and in our culture. When I thought about this, I realized that the charge leveled against me from the mentor teachers was not necessarily a bad thing.

I was just applying that attitude in the wrong place. There was nothing wrong with being confrontational, but that kind of approach does not work in a classroom. Teachers have to make the most of the situation they receive from year to year. They need to connect with students where they are, regardless of the background or the frustrations they may face.

That was not me. I wanted students to get what I was teaching them, and didn't want to wait, to struggle, to keep pushing through all of the setbacks students go through.

I didn't even want to be a parent for these students. I wanted to focus on learning. I wanted to focus on teaching. I had not signed up to be a social worker or a psychologist. If I had known that that was the requirement, I would not have become a teacher.

I was designed to be confrontational. That is the spirit I was gifted with. Every person brought into this world, and furthermore brought into the Kingdom of Heaven, has gifts given to us.

But the gift of righteousness, which is accorded to all who believe in Jesus and receive His life, that gift is for all of us, and creates in us boldness!

"For if by one man's offence death reigned by one; much more they which receive abundance of grace and of the gift of righteousness shall reign in life by one, Jesus Christ." (Romans 5:17)

and thus

"The wicked flee when no man pursueth: but the righteous are bold as a lion." (Proverbs 28:1)

Wednesday, March 1, 2017

Cudahy "Teacher" Jacqueline Cardona: A Disgrace to Her Profession

I have a particular hatred for professionals who lie to students and use them for political purposes.

It is particularly shameful.

I have already taken down Yolando Gonzalez, who engaged in a violent protest last year:





Now there's this other indoctrinaire, Jacqueline Cardona.

This woman is truly sad:



She is good friends with Chris Garcia, El Corrupto de Cudahy.

Because of her "friendship", she gets featured articles about herself in the overpriced city magazine: "Cudahy One"

Someone commit Cardona --
To stay away from children!


She is a shameful woman -- and she is a teacher?!