Showing posts with label Democratic. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Democratic. Show all posts

Saturday, May 21, 2022

Stupid Sales Tax Desperation? Five Mailers in Two Weeks


In the last two weeks, I have received five mailers with different endorsements and scare tactics telling me that I MUST, MUST, MUST support Measure SST, which will raise the city sales tax by half a percent.

If I do not support the sales tax hike, every core and essential service will shut down!

If I do not tax myself more on every purchase I make in the city, then the whole city will go bankrupt!

If I do not add to the inflation already crippling household budgets and forcing people to cut back on essentials, then life as we know it will end and the world will self-combust in a ball of fire!

Blah, blah, blah.

Councilman George Chen rightly denounced these scare tactics.

It's really insulting that the city staff and the city council majority forced the residents to even consider a tax hike, when so many of us are hurting because of the high costs of gas, groceries, and other goods and services.

How tone deaf, how out of touch can people be?

So, let's take a look at the five mailers which have flooded mailboxes throughout the city begging every voter to cough up more of their dwindling financial resources to the city:

Here's the first one I received:



"Every second counts!"

Yes, indeed, every second counts when it comes to emergency care. No one would dispute that. The argument, however, that we must raise the sales tax to ensure that the fire department and the ambulance services remain running is disingenuous at best.

Last month, I had a health emergency and called the fire department. They arrived on scene within two minutes. In fact, there are six fire stations in the city, and they are currently adequately staffed.

Also, there is already a $23 million reserve in the general fund (not $500k, as the Daily Breeze had earlier reported), and that fund is going to increase to $32 million by June, 2022.

We do not need the sales tax increase. No, we do not have to worry about health emergencies going unanswered if the sales tax increase does not pass.

Now, here's two more flyers pressing for the sales tax increase:



The SST committee is relying on LA County Supervisor Janice Hahn to make the pitch for this stupid sales tax? Really?

Who thought that this was a good idea?

Most people have no idea who their supervisor is, representing them in Downtown LA.

Second of all, so what if some other elected official outside of the city wants a sales tax increase? 

This kind of advertisement is a bigger turn-off than a turn-on to support this tax move.

Let's cut through the crap here: Supervisor Hahn simply wanted to put her face on a mailer so that she could promote herself, and she wants to keep in good graces with the public sector unions in the city. She is a union whore, after all, giving the public sector union lobbies everything they want and then some, no matter how much it costs the taxpayers, and no matter whether the citizens get their money's worth for all the spending.

These two flyers were just an insulting waste of time, to put it mildly. Pure political opportunism and sex promotion, nothing more.

Here are two more flyers. The first one tries to appeal to everyone's sense of Torrance as a nice, home-town place where everyone belongs and everyone shares the long-standing history of the city:



Hey, it's a great map! It's a nice, glossy mailer that gets the reader's attention.

But guess what? I still don't want to pay more in sales tax!

Here's another flyer:

Yes, there is that headline "Every penny stays right here to keep in Torrance."

Actually, such a blunt, obvious headline does not inspire confidence. I guess a focus group or another poll indicated that people are more worried now than before about how the money will actually be spent, and whether it will actually stay in the city of Torrance.

The SST committee is not being completely honest here. There is no certainty that the money will be used for police, fire, or paramedics. There are no specific strings attached to the monies to ensure that they go to essential services. In fact, much of the money will likely go to pensions and benefits for retired workers, which means that the money will NOT stay in the city at all!

But regarding the fact that the money will not be earmarked to specific costs, the city will indeed have the full discretion to spend the new tax revenues on anything they want in the city. That does not inspire confidence to support this measure, even if all the money stays in the city.

When the city council was debating this matter, Councilman Mattucci offered to consider this tax measure if the ballot initiative made it absolutely clear that the monies would only be spent on police or fire. For that kind of initiative to pass, however, would have required a two-thirds vote of the residents.

There is no way that two-thirds of the city would support a tax increase, even if the money would be directly tied to specific essential services in the city only.

In fact, when the city council and staff were investigating how to raise revenue via a sales tax increase, they had initially consider a .075 percent sales tax! After polling on that issue, however, they realized that it would not pass. When they considered a .5 percent sales tax, their polling sample resulted in a bare 52% supporting the tax increase. Of course, all of that was before the price of gas doubled and budget-crippling inflation had set in!

This Stupid Sales Tax Committee has tried so many arguments to make their case. They have threatened residents that core services will suffer if they do not vote to tax themselves more. They have asked Supervisor Hahn to endorse the proposal, and they sent two tacky flyers promoting the self-promoting county politician to everyone in the city.

And now they are trying to assure everyone that the money will stay in the city.

Last of all, they have listed a whole bunch of politicians and city staff, retired and current, who endorse this proposal.

Check out the latest flyer that I received, with a whole bunch of  endorsements!




                                                  

I really have to question this kind of logic.

So what if a bunch of former and current city councilmembers, administrative staff, fire chiefs, police chiefs, etc. endorse a sales tax hike? It's not their money.

It's our money they are asking for more of!

And, the current city councilmembers who endorse this SST measure are the same people who approved spending down the general fund reserves over the last SEVEN YEARS! They were fiscally irresponsible. Why should we pick up the tab on their lack of restraint?

But what really caught my attention with this latest flyer is that they repeat names on the list! Did anyone bother to edit this flyer?

Look at these close-up shots of the listed endorsements:




"Street Racing Kills" is listed twice. What does the fight to curb street racing (which is a dangerous practice, to be sure) have to do with raising the sales tax? And why list it twice? Granted, the second list includes the director for the movement, but shouldn't the organization's endorsement alone suffice?

Oh, and the flyer lists Jimmy Gow, the abused President of the Torrance Democratic Club, as an endorser. This is the shameless, self-promotional politics that we got with the two previous flyers propping up Supervisor Hahn. Give me a break!

Oh, and Jimmy Gow is listed twice, too:


So, because a partisan activist who trespassed on a veterans hall, and went with minions who spit at veterans and stole their property -- he is listed twice on a flyer to endorse a sales tax increase?

What was the SST Committee thinking?!

This is desperation, nothing more.

Torrance voters need to reject this Stupid Sales Tax. One flyer after another indicates clear desperation. Frankly, the committee pushing this measure should be ashamed of themselves, considering all the economic challenges that Torrance residents are facing as it is.

The United States is facing a recession. The S and P Index just touched into Bear Market territory this past week.

The price of gas has skyrocketed, and it's only going higher. The price of groceries is going up by 20%, 30%, 40%. Business is slowing for many small business owners, too.

And with this perfect storm of econmic troubles, the city council and staff want to push a sales tax increase? And this increase is not even necessary, and it will only discourage commerce in the city.

Say NO to the Stupid Sales Tax increase.

                         

Saturday, April 30, 2022

Torrance City Council Election 2022: The Fight For North Torrance (District One)

 There are two very contentious races in the 2022 Torrance City Council Elections:

1. Torrance City Council, District One

2. Torrance City Treasurer

For this post, I am going to explore the District One contest more closely. 



This is the northern most district, a region of the city which has not gotten as much attention compared to other areas of the city. Based on the number of Title One enrollees at North High School, it's the poorest area of the city. It has seen a higher degree of crime compared to other areas of the city as well.

It's also the most Democratic region of the city, if one is paying attention to the affilation of voters in the area. Of course, I have found that many residents in the city are not as keenly focused on the party affiliation of city council candidates, as much as they focus on

There are four candidates for this seat. Right away, we understand why this fight is so contentious.

Here are the candidates vying for the seat, with their political affiliations and their endorsements

1. Jimmy Gow


Democrat

Endorsements:

Pat Furey: Mayor of Torrance

Al Muratsuchi: Assemblymember representing Torrance

Maxine Waters: Congresswoman representing Torrance

Janice Hahn: LA County Supervisor representing Torrance

2. David Zygielbaum


Democrat

Endorsements:

Torrance Police Officers Association

Torrance Firefighters Association

Pat Furey: Mayor of Torrance


3. David Kartsonis


Republican

Endorsements:

George Nakano - Former California State Assemblyman

Councilwoman Heidi Ann Ashcraft - Torrance Councilwoman; Former TUSD School Board Member Councilman Mike Griffiths - Torrance Councilman 
Frank Scotto - Former Torrance Mayor 
Tom Brewer - Former Torrance Councilman 
Paul Nowatka Former Torrance Councilman 
Maureen O’Donnell - Former Torrance Councilwoman; Former El Camino College Trustee 
Bill Sutherland - Former Torrance Councilman 
Martha Deutch - Former TUSD School Board Member; President of the Torrance Education Foundation Dr. George Mannon - Former TUSD Superintendent 
Ken Brown - Trustee Area 1; Community College Instructor 
Siannah Collado Boutté - Former ECC Trustee, Former ECC ASO President 
Eman Dalili - Former Trustee; Former ECC Student Body President; Gubernatorial Appointee to the California Board of Governors 
Dr. Thomas Fallo - Former El Camino College Superintendant/President 
Brooke Matson - Former Trustee; Current Board Member of the El Camino College Foundation 
John Vargas - Former Trustee 
Matthew Brach - SCROC Governing Board; Palos Verdes Unified School District School Board 
Mark Burton - Former Manhattan Beach Mayor 
Mark Waronek - Lomita City Councilman 
Hugo Rojas - Vice-President, Centinela Valley Unified High School District

4. Jon Kaji




Independent

Endorsements:

Torrance City Councilman George Chen

Torrance City Councilman Aurelio Mattucci

El Camino College Trustee Trisha Murakawa

City of Gardena Mayor Tasha Cerda

City of Gardena Councilman Rodney Tanaka

City of Gardena City Clerk Mina Simenza

Former State Treasurer John Chiang

Former LA County Supervisor Don Knabe

Former LA County Supervisor Michael Antonovich

Former City of LA Councilmembers Jan Perry and David Ryu

Former LA County CEO William Fujioka

Former Chief of Staff, Rep. Steve Kuykendall,  Garrett Ashley

Former City of Torrance Planning Commissioner,  Ray Uchima

Civil rights attorney, Dale Minami, Esq.

Actor and civil rights activist, George Takei

Actor and comedian, Derek Mio

USC Heisman Trophy winner and Super Bowl Champion, Mike Garrett

Los Angeles Laker legend Michael Cooper

PGA Professional Ted Oh

Former SONY Interactive Entertainment Chairman and CEO, Shawn Layden


This race has a diverse split in all the endorsements. That certain will make for an interesting contest come June 7th, 2022.

How does this all break down, though?

Jimmy Gow is clearly the most partisan of the endorsements. He has gotten complete backing from every Democratic machine politician in the region, from Congress to the county to the state assembly. No one should be surprsied, since he remains the president of the Torrance Democratic Club, an institution with a history of shutting down public participation when residents want to confront their locally elected officials.

The last thing that many TOrrance voters want is an outright partisan, based on how elections have fallen for the last several decades in the city of Torrance. What's worse, though, is that Jimmy Gow was recently removed from the commission that he had served on for a number of years: The Social Services Commission.

It's a bitter irony that he servded on that commission, based on his obstreperous behavior during the 2016 President election. His infamously visited the West Carson Veterans Hall in 2016, in which he and other rabid leftists trespassed on the property, spit at veterans, pushed them around, and one of the hateful activists stole the phone from one of the veterans at the hall.


Jimmy Gow should be a clear "No" for any voter in North Torrance. He ran in 2018, when city council seats were still elected at large, and he was the bottom vote-getter. Will his overt connections to the Democratic Party get him into the seat?

Well, Democratic voters in North Torrance have another, more professional choice: LA County Deputy DA David Zygielbaum.

He's much more likeable and approachable. He also has a young family and he currently serves on a commission, having received the unanimous endorsement of the city council at that time. He helped start a Neighborhood Watch in his area, too. Plus the fact that he has endorsed by the two public safety unions in the city, and Zygielbaum is a viable option for partisan voters who want a city councilman with some panache and substance.

However, any candidate who receives Mayor Pat Furey's endorsement should invite considerable suspicious. Pat Furey has been a disgrace, an absolute disaster for the city of Torrance. A bitter partisan with open disdain for his colleagues on the council, a political hack of dubious moral distinction who colluded with a local PAC during the 2014 Torrance City Council elections, Furey is one creepy fellow. Many people in the city have had nothing but disdain for this man, in large part because of his rampant disrespect to voters and speakers in the city council chambers.

And his complete incompetence when it comes to running city council meetings has harmed everyone in the city. He refused to take a stand against outside hate groups which have long disrupted city council meetings. He has refused to take a stance against the relentless borrowing from the city's general fund.

Pat Furey has been a huge disappointment to the city, and anyone whom he endorses is all the more suspect as a result.

Like Zygielbaum, David Kartsonis has a considerable record of public service in the city of Torrance, specifically for North Torrance, and for the general region due to his advocacy and volunteer efforts with El Camino College. In 2020, he ran for a seat on the El Co Board of Trustees, and he even received numerous endorsements from local and county elected officials from across the political spectrum.

Yet he still lost.

He's running for the North Torrance city council seat with a considerable array of endorsements, but many of them are formerly elected officials, not current ones, aside from Torrance City Councilmembers Mike Griffiths and Heide Ashcraft. 

Kartsonis has considerable ties to the area, no doubt, and he does not have a partisan axe to grind. Is he the best pick for the seat?

Then there's Jon Kaji.

He's an Independent, and an independent business owner. He has the endorsement of two Torrance city councilmembers. He has ties to the Torrance business community, certainly. Most of his endorsements are from his activism and his connections with his alma mater USC.

It helps to have someone who is more of an outsider running for the Torrance City Council. As it stands now, two of the city councilmembers--George Chen and Sharon Kalani--never served on city commissioners before. It's worthwhile for voters to send a message to the community that they will give "outsiders" a chance to serve on the city council, as well.

There is one clear distinction which Kaji holds compared to the other three candidates: he is the only candidate who opposes raising the city sales tax. That is a considerable development, and makes him a worthwhile consideration.

Final Reflection

Diverse, divided endorsements, different political backgrounds, distinct records of public service: all these elements make the race for Torrance City Council District One an election for the Torrance history books. How will the voters assess these different candidates? Will the endorsements play any kind of factor? Each nominee has a number of respectable suppporters, and some of them have supporters from the same government agency (Torrance City Council, El Camino College Board of Trustees.)

The professional background of each candidate is something to consider, as well.

How will this race shape up going into June 7th?

Tuesday, October 17, 2017

BREAKING! Federal Lawsuit Filed to Stop Racist District-Based Voting in CA Cities

FORWARD TO ALL CALIFORNIANS

Finally!  Our big federal lawsuit that we have been pushing for since May has been filed in San Diego Federal Court.  We fully expect to succeed at the higher court and this case will most likely go all the way to the Supreme Court.  Racially gerrymandered voting districts are racist, period.  100% unconstitutional and unAmerican.  Hopefully this federal lawsuit will restore at-large voting to all of the many dozens of cities and school districts statewide that have switched to race-based Latino voting districts under threat of lawsuit from Malibu attorney Kevin Shenkman and other deviant attorneys like him in CA.  The Plaintiffs are asking for an injunction to freeze the districting process in dozens of cities and ultimately the overturning of the illegal and falsely named “California Voting Rights Act” of 2002.



I am also happy to report now that other Poway patriots that we know are now joining the lawsuit as plaintiffs.  Our local activists are jumping into the fight to save California, as usual. 

Thank you to everyone who has supported our efforts the past 6 months and especially to those who donated to our legal fund over the summer to get this lawsuit off the ground with the litigation strategy from Kassouni Law.  To donate directly to the new law firm handling the lawsuit for their ongoing legal expenses, visit:  https://www.ProjectonFairRepresentation.org/.   After a thorough legal review by Constitutional legal experts, it has been determined that a federal lawsuit is the ONLY way we can save all of California from race-based district voting in our cities.


Law firm news release here:

Copy of the lawsuit (complaint):


SDUT Article:

Ex-Poway mayor sues over voting rights act
Oct. 4, 2017
Former Poway Mayor Don Higginson has filed a federal lawsuit challenging the constitutionality of the California Voting Rights Act (CVRA).
Under threat of expensive litigation, Poway became the most recent city in San Diego County to be forced to change the way it elects its city council members, from an at-large system, which is said to violate the voting rights act, to a by-district system.
Higginson is being represented by The Project of Fair Representation, a nonprofit legal foundation based in Arlington, Va., which will fund the litigation.  He filed the lawsuit Wednesday in San Diego federal court.
The voting rights act is designed to give minority members (Latinos/Mexican citizens/illegal aliens) of a community a better chance at representation on city council and other local government agencies.
When a demand letter was sent to the city this summer from Malibu attorney Kevin Shenkman threatening to sue if Poway didn’t immediately change the way it elects its council, the city council reluctantly did so to avoid potentially costly legal fees in what history has shown would likely be a losing court battle.

In the demand letter, similar to dozens of others he has sent out locally and around the state in the last few years, Shenkman reminded the city that he had successfully sued “the City of Palmdale for violating the CVRA. After an eight-day trial, we prevailed. After spending millions of dollars, a district-based remedy was ultimately imposed upon the Palmdale city council, with districts that combine all incumbents into one of the four districts.”
Just this week, the Poway council finalized it’s decision to create four election districts.
Poway is a predominantly Caucasian suburban community of about 49,000 people with a Latino population of about 15 percent. Because the minority population is relatively small and not geographically bunched together, no district could logically be created that would create a minority-majority voting area.
Edward Blum, the president of The Project on Fair Representation, said Poway is representative of dozens of cities in the state that have been forced to change election systems.  He said Higginson was chosen to front the lawsuit after Blum read online a column Higginson had written in the local Poway News Chieftain newspaper decrying the misuse of the CVRA.
Higginson is suing the State of California and the City of Poway, though the action against the city is only procedural.
“It was only because the city of Poway had a proverbial gun to its head that these districts were adopted,” Higginson said. “Every member of the City Council knew that it would cost Poway millions of taxpayer dollars to fight this in court.”
Higginson said the law is unconstitutional on its face because it requires gerrymandering based on race or ethnicity.
“In Poway,” he added, “where you are predominately Caucasian, it seems pretty foolish to even address that.
“Every voter in Poway should feel personally offended by the fact that being forced to go to district elections will eliminate your power to vote for a majority of the Poway City Council,” he said.
The lawsuit challenges the constitutionality of the CVRA under the Equal Protection clause of the Fourteenth Amendment.
“The California Voting Rights Act forces jurisdictions to make race the sole factor in districting,” Blum said. “It splits apart multi-ethnic, multi-racial neighborhoods in order to create gerrymandered voting districts. This is bad for all citizens, regardless of their race or ethnicity. This law is clearly unconstitutional.”
The lawsuit relates comments made by all of the Poway councilman during the debate that preceded the elections system change.
“We’ve gone through denial, and we’ve gone through anger, and now we’re into acceptance,” Councilman John Mullin said. “So, to those of you in the audience who think that we should be fighting this, we concur. I have no illusions that this will lead to better government for our city. I’m pretty proud of the job we do as we are now constituted… . But having said all of that, again we have a gun to our heads and we have no choice.”
Deputy Mayor Barry Leonard said, “I get it. I hate it but I get it.” He explained his view that “we respond to everybody in the City. We don’t pick certain people in certain neighborhoods and say we’ll treat them any differently. There is no evidence of that whatsoever. So, I feel like we’re already being found guilty of something and we don’t have a chance to prove our innocence. It’s just the deck is stacked. So, rather than spend a million dollars of the taxpayers’ money, we roll over to these bullies.”
Blum said it will likely be months before a court date is set.

SDUT Editorial praises Federal Lawsuit; Slams Kevin Shenkman:
Poway ex-Mayor Higginson earns a rose for picking the right fight
A rose — the Peerless Point Man award — to former Poway Mayor Don Higginson for agreeing to put his honorable name on a federal lawsuit disputing the constitutionality of the 2001 California Voting Rights Act.
Over and over, this well-meaning legislation has been perverted to force cities to adopt district elections when there’s no evidence of ongoing racial discrimination or even that district elections will remedy past or current discrimination.
Poway is just the latest city to be dragged, kicking and screaming, into district elections under the threat of a lawsuit from a freebooting Malibu attorney who’s exploiting the CVRA to force district elections.
To the rescue comes the the Project on Fair Representation, a nonprofit with conservative donors that has a record of success filing state and federal cases against a whole range of legislated minority and racial preferences.

By the way, this shouldn’t be a partisan issue.
Even if you believe that minorities are unfairly underrepresented in government, district elections are not the rational remedy in all cases.
There’s no way, for example, that Poway with a spread-out 15 percent Latino minority population can gerrymander districts that will favor Latino candidates.
This lawsuit may take years to wind through the courts, but Higginson has done his city proud by lending his name to a long overdue challenge of an absurd status quo.



Jeff Schwilk

USMC Retired
“No Better Friend, No Worse Enemy”

Friday, September 15, 2017

Call to Action: Slam Julia Brownley's Office for Disrespect Toward Trump Supporter in Washington DC




Everyone!

I went to Congresswoman Julia Brownley's (D-Ventura) office early this morning. The reception that I received from her staffers was terrible. I told them that I was opposed to all forms of amnesty. I also opposed DACA and I don't want those young illegals getting any Andis T. I want them deported.
Then one of the staffers came up to me. Her name is Katie Gillen. She was very rude to me. She tried to cut me off and try to rush me out of the office. I said to her I oppose illegal immigration. Katie Gillen then said to me that congresswoman brownley has chosen to support the DACA kids and wants them to have legal status. I was really offended and I asked why.

Right away Gillen ran out of the office and she ran to a capitol police officer down the hallway. It was really clear that she was going to try to make a scene and make it look like I was threatening people. I was not. Within five minutes, five Capitol police officers descended at the office three of them surrounded me. They detained me and tried to get my personal information. They claim that I had said racist things to miss Gillen. I I said No Such Thing. The scheduler for Congresswoman Brownley totally lied to the police. It was very offensive.

Please call Congresswoman Brownley's office right now and let them have it. Tell them that they need to fire Katie Gillen right now. Please also tell them that there should be no amnesty for illegals and DACA should not be continued and those recipient should also be deported.

Congresswoman Julia Brownley
202-225-5811

Chief of Staff:
(323) 743-3175

Here's my full report for the the public following what happened to me:


Monday, June 26, 2017

Desperate Democrats Depend on Senator "Nobody" Hassan for Fundraising

The Democratic Party is in big trouble. They are looking at huge losses going into 2018, especially in the United States Senate.

Then comes 2020, and the news has just arrived that the Supreme Court will allow Trump's travel ban to continue, regardless of the lower federal court's opposition.



 Besides, the Supreme Court is going to sustain the defunding of sanctuary cities as well as the building of the wall.

The Democratic Party is dead for all intents and purposes.

And there is nothing that the newly elected Maggie Hassan can do about it.
Arthur -- 

We won our Senate race in New Hampshire last November by just 1,017 votes. That's barely 100 people per county.

If we hadn't been able to hire one more organizer or had to cut back on ad time just a little bit, it's easy to see how this election could have gone the other way -- and there'd be one more Republican in the Senate.

So take it from me, Arthur: every dollar you give to elect Democrats makes a difference.

Because we had what it took to win, I get to work every day in the Senate with Democrats who are standing up for hardworking Americans and their families. I couldn't be prouder to be resisting Trump and Washington Republicans' attempts to repeal affordable care, weaken our public schools, and turn the clock back on women's rights.

But we need more Democrats -- at the local, state, and federal level -- if we're going to win these fights, and that means we need to win more close elections like mine this year and in 2018.

Arthur, that's where you come in.




Friday is a big end-of-quarter fundraising deadline for Democrats. We need to elect Democratic governors and state legislators in Virginia and New Jersey in November, and lay the groundwork to take back Congress next year.

Every election matters, and even $10 can make a difference in a close race -- I guarantee it. Before Friday's quarterly deadline, pitch in $10 or whatever you're able to help Democrats win.

Thank you.

With every good wish,

Maggie Hassan
U.S. Senator, New Hampshire 


The Reoubulicans outragise dthe Democartic big time. Huge money compared to what the foundering, desperate Democrats brought it

Sunday, May 21, 2017

Shut The F--- UP! CA Democratic Party Chairman Contest in Upheaval!

John Burton better have another set of expletives ready.

The progressives and the Democratic establishment are already at each other's throats.

Oh F---k!

Progressives were disrupting his speech with the DNC Chairman Tom Perez. He told them to "Shut the f--k up and get out!"



Of course, they are not going anywhere ... or are they?

So, how to the California Democratic Party elections end?

First, the specifics about the state party chairman's race:

1,493 Eric Bauman
1,431 Kimberly Ellis

We are talking about ... 60 votes out of 2, 924 delegate votes.

Incredible!



So, we have results from tonight's balloting for the statewide officers of the Democratic Party:
  • Chair: Eric Bauman
  • Female Vice Chair: Alex Rooker
  • Male Vice Chair: Daraka Larimore-Hall
  • Secretary: RUNOFF: Carolyn Fowler v. Jenny Bach
  • Controller: Daniel Weitzman
The runoff for secretary will be held tomorrow morning.

Then an hour later, the following information was released.

From Scott Lay's "The Nooner"

Just now, CDP chair candidate Kimberly Ellis--who apparently fell short to Eric Bauman by 60 votes--spoke to her very passionate supporters.

While it started out as a standard concession speech about the campaign over the last two years, she pivoted and said "We're in touch with legal counsel. . . This race is not over yet.
I guess I'm coming back over here tomorrow. So much for going to farmers' market.
- Scott



Wow! THis election just went from bad to really bad.

Chaos reigns within the California Democatic PARTY!

And check out how heated it has gotten among the Progressives!

Uh Oh! Trouble in progressive utopian paradise?!

And the California Democratic Party officials and ballot counters will not allow for a recount?

Wow, it is true ...

This is so true.



The Democracy is not democratic ... at all. It's just like what the DNC did to the Bernie-crats during Election 2016.

In California, the Bernie progressives will not back down:

The Los Angeles Times will be all over this infighitng.


STAY TUNED!

Saturday, December 17, 2016

Obama's "Fight" for Religious Liberty

Barack Obama cannot leave the White House fast enough. This rush to exit does not come from the Obama family, but from the wide array of frustrated and angry Americans who had voted for the guy hoping for hope and change.

That got more of the same corruption and failure, mired with a collegial, elitist arrogance which demanded that the United States confirm to the transformation which the wannabe educated idiot from Hawaii by way of Indonesia and Kenya wanted.

This man is the worst President that this country has ever endured.

Ever. Jimmy Carter must wake up every morning thankful to no longer headline the "Worst Presidents Ever" list.

His actions have been particularly terrible on First Amendment freedoms, particularly religious liberty. This man is one of the worst liars to inhabit the White House (and yes, I am keeping Richard Nixon in mind).


Yet he claims to be a champion of religious liberty?



Whose? His own?

He has allowed people to worship him, and he encourages the fawning worship.

FACT SHEET: Promoting and Protecting Religious Freedom Around the Globe

“[P]romoting religious freedom is a key objective of U.S. foreign policy. And I’m proud that no nation on Earth does more to stand up for the freedom of religion around the world than the United States of America.”

                 -  President Barack Obama, February 6, 2014

Throughout the Obama Administration, the U.S. Government has prioritized efforts to promote freedom of religion globally as a universal human right, a strategic national interest, and as a key foreign policy objective.  The Administration has praised countries that have made strides to promote religious freedom, assisted governments in taking steps to address shortcomings, and denounced severe violators of religious freedom; provided support to individuals who have been persecuted on account of their beliefs, and advocated for the rights of religious minorities.  The Obama Administration has also worked closely with civil society organizations, including religious communities, in promoting freedom of religion or belief for all people.

Please feel free to comment below this blog post.

Would you agree that President Obama has championed religious liberty here, at home?