Showing posts with label free speech. Show all posts
Showing posts with label free speech. Show all posts

Monday, November 21, 2022

Musk Calls It: The ADL Is a Defamatory Hate Group


 

Well, now I have seen more (and I hope to see everything soon enough)

Really.

This is how a so-called "civil rights organization" dismisses freedom of speech.

But Musk didn't take this libel lying down: This is the kind of push-back we need to see from more private firms, billionaires, and everyone else who is tired of the Woke Tyranny. Is Musk perfect? By no means. 

 But has done a great service by freeing up Twitter and making it accessible to more people.

I am also glad for him shaming the defamatory hate group known as "The Anti-Defamation League."

They have lost all credibility, and now we all know that they are a partisan (and may I add "anti-Semitic") hate group.

Quit defaming me!

Wednesday, February 16, 2022

Montana MassResistance: Bold Pastor Fights Against LGBT-Based Libel Lawsuit

 Free speech and free press under huge assault in Montana by LGBT legal network

Jordan Hall, Baptist pastor and publisher of popular conservative news site, sued for libel by transgender lobbyist

State’s left-wing legal establishment & well-funded LGBT “lawfare” mob seek to stop site’s influential voice

Far-left Judge to hold preliminary hearing Feb. 16 to determine whether pastor is a “dangerous person"

February 15, 2022
ALT TEXT Pastor Jordan Hall with his wife and five children.

A conservative pastor who is the publisher of Montana’s largest and most influential conservative news site is being sued for “libel” by a bizarre transgender lobbyist. The leftist judge assigned to the case is also threatening the pastor with fines and a gag order even before the trial takes place.

This assault on free speech and free press is buttressed by the state’s far-left legal establishment and appears to be funded by the wealthy LGBT and Planned Parenthood lobby. The aggressive legal action, including an invasive “discovery” process of the pastor’s media operation, is clearly aimed to put the conservative news site and its subsidiary voices out of business. The radicals would even like to dictate what the pastor may say in his own church.

Background

Montana Democrats are still reeling from the Republican blowout victory in the 2020 election. Republicans now have a super-majority in both houses of the Legislature, and hold the Governorship and all statewide offices (Attorney General, Secretary of State, Supervisor of Public Instruction, Auditor).

ALT TEXT The Montana Capitol building in Helena

Paradoxically, the judiciary in Montana is dominated by leftists. The state’s only law school is at the very liberal University of Montana and the state’s lawyers – and thus the judges – are far more left-wing than the general population.

Just as in DC back in 2016, the Democrats’ response to the Republican sweep has been to lash out wildly. Leftist attorneys are using the liberal courts in Montana to challenge conservative bills passed in the 2021 legislative session (pro-life laws, the ban on transgender boys in girls’ sports, strengthening parents’ rights, reining in sex ed, strengthening election law, and banning discrimination on the basis of vaccination status). They are also contesting Attorney General Knudsen’s and Supervisor of Public Instruction Arntzen’s policies banning Critical Race Theory and declaring masks optional in schools.

One news site stands out

As in other conservative areas, the news media across the state is also horribly left-wing. The one prominent exception is the Montana Daily Gazette, published by Jordan (“JD”) Hall, who is also a Baptist minister. The Gazette is bold and straight-shooting, with a down-to-earth style – and is definitely not “PC.” It has caught the attention of Montanans tired of the other news outlets. On many days, the Gazette often claims the highest readership of any news source in Montana. Some say its fearless reporting contributed to the Republican sweep in the 2020 election.

ALT TEXT

Hall is also very influential in Montana through his other conservative Christian media. He runs the well-respected religious blog Protestia, the podcast Pulpit & Pen, and a radio station. He shares Christian truth without reservation.

While many conservatives are becoming reluctant to speak out publicly on hot-button issues, Pastor Hall is fearless – and has definitely become a thorn in the side of the Left in Montana.

Bizarre transgender lobbyist in the Montana Capitol

Adrian Jawort identifies as “transgender” and is a member of the Northern Cheyenne tribe. He is also a registered lobbyist in the Montana legislature. He is quite a sight in that building. As his own attorneys describe him:

Adrian is physically distinctive: Native American, transgender, 6’3” in heels, always dressed in black dresses and hosiery, her [sic] black hair trimmed short on the sides with curls falling down her [sic] forehead.

ALT TEXT Mr. Jawort dressed for his pro-transgender lobbying at the Montana Capitol in 2021. He was especially angry over the bill to outlaw “transgender” surgical procedures for minors and the bill (now law) to ban transgender boys from girls’ sports. (Photo from Hall’s May 3, 2021 Gazette column)

In the 2021 session, Jawort lobbied against the (successful) bill banning “transgender” boys in girls’ sports, and the (failed) bill to ban surgical procedures to “transition” minors.

His demeanor and antics around the Capitol are infamous. According to Hall, Jawort and another transgender activist simulated sodomy in the Supreme Court chambers until told by security to leave.

ALT TEXT Photo in Hall’s report: Jawort (2nd from left) and friends in the Montana Supreme Court chambers.

Legislators were familiar with Jawort’s “torrent of obscene, angry social media posts that he published throughout the 2021 legislative session” (according to a court filing by Hall). Luckily, Hall took screen shots of some of those posts before Jawort deleted them.

We have been told that at first many legislators did not know Jawort was a lobbyist, but assumed he was a homeless man wandering around the building. Not surprisingly, “numerous legislators” had contacted Hall with concerns about Jawort’s lobbying style.

The incident

On April 22, 2021, one of the most controversial transgender bills of the legislative session, HB 112 (the bill barring transgender male students from participating on female sports teams), was scheduled for a vote on the Senate floor. Six or seven transgender activists, including Jawort, converged on the Montana Capitol that day to try to halt its passage. According to a court filing, Jawort made clear earlier in the day that he would vigorously lobby Senators to vote against HB 112.

Eyewitnesses later contacted Hall to report that Jawort and his cohorts, wearing Covid masks and makeup, encountered legislators in the Capitol hallways. Allegedly, there was some abusive language directed at the legislators, and one of them, an elderly Senator, had to be escorted away to avoid the disturbance.

The Montana Daily Gazette coverage – and alleged libel

Before publishing his report on the event, Jordan Hall contacted Jawort asking to get his side of the story. But Jawort refused to talk with him.

On May 3, 2021, the Montana Daily Gazette published Hall’s article, Who’s the Gothic Transvestite Haunting the Halls of the Montana Capitol? It did not hold back in its general description of Jawort, culled from the numerous phone calls Hall had received:

Fooling precisely no one, the man has been seen wandering the Montana State Capitol like an out-of-place Sasquatch in goth make-up, looking for a snack or someone to yell at. The ill-tempered, dress-wearing man was regularly seen in the gallery of both the House and Senate, chastising legislators with his wagging, giant man fingers, and sitting in fish-net stockings reapplying his make-up with all the precision of a birthday clown with a bad hangover.

The article also included these two profane quotes from Jawort’s social media posts:

Fascist fucks. Tomorrow I will file paperwork likely leading to a lawsuit challenging one of the many anti-trans bills. My reward will be seeing my name dragged through the mud. Being mocked by good Christians and doxxed…


Fight the power of the State of Montana. Fuck your #Montaliban theocracy. I am not a political pawn in a chess game–someone to be used for ‘culture war’ clout and fodder. I am a fucking Indigenous Queen of these Indian Lands.

Regarding the confrontation with legislators, the Gazette article simply had two sentences:

Reportedly, the angry transvestite and several of his associates had cornered Senator Butch Gillespie in an angry tirade. Also reportedly, Montana Family Foundation President Jeff Laszloffy escorted Sen. Gillespie to the Sergeant of Arms for his protection.

Those two sentences are now at the center of the huge lawsuit. They would seem rather innocuous, especially given the larger context.

Jawort ignites over the article – files failed lawsuit

On July 12, 2021, Jawort filed a complaint against Hall in Richland County Court (where Hall’s hometown of Sidney is located). He demanded monetary damages for Hall’s “transphobic” statements and for supposedly “doxing” him (though Hall had included only publicly available information from Jawort’s public Facebook or tweets).

But there is no such crime as “transphobia” in Montana law (or US law), and the case went nowhere. Nevertheless, Jawort set up a GoFundMe page for his attempted lawsuit charging “transphobic hate speech.”

ALT TEXT Partial screen shot of Jawort’s GoFundMe page (accessed 2-13-22)

A new lawsuit – alleging libel

Soon after that, Jawort connected with a group of well-heeled leftist attorneys willing to take on his case. He is now being represented by Attorney Raph Graybill and two attorneys at the Upper Seven Law firm, Constance Van Kley and Rylee Sommers-Flanagan. Graybill is a well-known Montana attorney who recently ran for state Attorney General (losing 59%-41%). The Upper Seven Law firm is a social-justice group apparently set up for cases like this. All three attorneys clerked at the left-leaning Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals.

The attorneys re-filed the case and changed the charge to libel. They are focusing only on the two sentences cited above: "Reportedly, the angry transvestite and several of his associates had cornered Senator Butch Gillespie in an angry tirade. Also reportedly, Montana Family Foundation President Jeff Laszloffy escorted Sen. Gillespie to the Sergeant of Arms for his protection." 

They are claiming that Jawort was not present at that confrontation – not part of the group that accosted the legislators – so these are false, libelous statements. They assert that since the group was wearing masks, it was only assumed that Jawort was one of them. They are seeking $250,000 in damages from Hall.

The claim of libel would not appear to hold much water: (1) Hall’s article said only that Jawort was “reportedly” part of the group. That is not a false statement. (2) Despite a mask, Jawort is a very recognizable figure – a 6’3” man wearing a black dress with a distinctive voice. (3) Hall attempted to get Jawort’s side of the story, but Jawort refused. (4) By any sensible legal definition, Jawort is a “limited public figure” which in Montana requires a high standard for libel. (5) Hall relied on credible sources who identified Jawort as the individual who accosted the Senator, and as a credentialed journalist he does not have to reveal these sources.

The arguments put forth in Jawort’s lawyers’ filings appear to be very weak and amateurish, though strongly worded. Thus, in a normal court this would get very far. But this isn’t a normal situation at all.

Judge shopping

Through a series of events, Jawort’s lawyers were able to get the case heard in a different county under a judge, Elizabeth Best, who is arguably the most ruthlessly left-wing in the state. She is notorious among Montanans for her leftist judicial activism. (A Change.org petition has 2,325 signatures calling for her removal from the bench.)

ALT TEXT Judge Elizabeth Best [Great Falls Tribune photo]

Judicial bias and enormous legal harassment

Judge Best has not hidden her disdain for Pastor Hall. In one court ruling, she characterized his article as using “an offensive and ignorant epithet used by transphobic people, obviously aimed at demeaning Jawort.” Thus, the judge is accusing him of ignorance and “transphobia” – and even before the trial, exposes her belief that Hall intended to demean (libel) Jawort.

She has ruled that Jawort is not a “limited public figure,” and that the confrontation incident had no connection to Jawort’s work as a lobbyist. This means that the plaintiff does not have to prove “malice,” just “negligence” on Hall’s part.

Judge Best has allowed Jawort’s lawyers to conduct an enormous amount of legal harassment against Hall, mostly in for form of incredibly aggressive “discovery” demands, almost on a daily basis. Jawort’s lawyers are demanding records and other information on virtually everything about the Montana Daily Gazette business, plus extensive information about everyone who works there. He’s being told to provide his text messages and emails going back years on every person he’s contacted. He must provide copies of every sermon he has given, every manuscript he has written, and even his sermon and public speaking notes. Objections to this by Hall’s lawyer have been overruled by Judge Best. (Moreover, it is well known that Best is close friends with Graybill, Jawort's lawyer.)

It's been estimated that Jawort's legal team has already spent over $150,000 on this case - and the trial hasn't even begun.

Christian verses certainly anger this fellow. The Satanic horns, inverted cross on his forehead, and blood dripping from his mouth indicate where he’s coming from. (Photo: Jawort’s public Facebook page)

Special hearing on Wednesday, Feb. 16 to determine if Hall is a “threat” to public order

Pastor Hall’s actual trial hasn’t been scheduled. But Judge Best is conducting a special hearing on Wednesday, Feb. 16, to determine if Hall is a “threat” to public order.

Over the past few months, Hall has traveled around the state giving speeches in order to raise money for his legal defense. His lawyer says he will need a minimum of $100,000. His speeches are mostly to Christian groups. Being a Baptist pastor, Hall uses a lot of Bible quotes and Christian imagery. Jawort’s lawyers are charging – and Judge Best seems to be agreeing – that these speeches somehow constitute “threats” to the plaintiff, the judge, and others. (Of course, Hall has no history whatsoever of threats or violence.) The judge is prepared to impose extreme sanctions on Hall over this.

ALT TEXT Pastor Hall at a rally at the Montana Capitol in Helena. (Photo: Brandi Lyon)

Best is also angry that Hall is reluctant to follow her “mask mandate” in the courtroom. Montana has no mask mandates whatsoever at this time, and it is very questionable whether Best has the authority to impose one.

According to information we have, Best has likely decided to impose both judicial and financial sanctions at the hearing on Wednesday. The judicial sanctions could include a gag order or other limitations. The financial sanctions could be a fine anywhere from tens of thousands to hundreds of thousands of dollars. It's also likely she could declare a default judgment against him, so a trial would not even be held.

This is the frightening state of affairs in the supposedly “red” state of Montana. We will report on what happens at the hearing.

Final thoughts

Throughout all this, the thing that has saddened Pastor Hall the most, he told us, is the number of conservative Christian pastors who have shied away from publicly supporting him. It’s not that they think he’s wrong. They privately admit that they are “afraid” of the LGBT movement and the power of the state. As one pastor told him, “I just can’t have them picketing my church.”

God Bless Jordan Hall. We need a thousand more like him. You can donate to his legal defense fund here.

Facebook Twitter Email Print

Please help us continue to do our uncompromising work!

Our successes depend on people like you.

Donate to MassResistance

Your support will make the difference!

Friday, December 31, 2021

Singaporean Defends Home Country's Limitations on Freedom of Speech

From R_Ramendump:

Free speech is good, but calling singapore a dictatorship, that many are saying in the comments is not a true statement. A dictatorship is a country under the rule of a single person or party, with no tolerance of any other ruling ideologies, yes there is a law against speaking out against the government and religions in singapore, but that is for a whole other reason than muting the people and making sure the party is at the top. I am myself, I have no bias towards any ruling party for I am unable to vote. 

In 1965, there were racial riots between the prominent races in singapore at the time, this was due to a few uneducated or badly educated troublemaking people back in the day, they spread false information and accused certain races of things, causing hatred to brew in their racial groups. A huge riot was a result of that, many people died, yes not as much as wars and some other riots in other countries, but if a country had the ability to prevent this from happening again, would they not? 

If a riot ensued in Singapore in modern times this would mean alot of problems, Singapore is a international port, many countries including the US, China, India, Japan, Canada and many others use our port ofr entrepot trade, if Singapore ceases to function, all countries would be affected, not only us. At the cost of slight free speech, against racial disagreements and political disagreements to ensure stability of the relations between the people in our country, I feel that it is an ok trade off, instead of the sadly, dysfunctionality of some parts of countries with Free Speech, such as the US. 

Again, many people are allowed to have many of their own opinions, just that the opinions that could cause potential trouble in Singapore are silenced with a limit. Singapore still allows for people to talk out against the government for inequality and problems, as long as its viable to the other groups and societies in the country. Singapore has also many parties, but one party has been ruling for a long while due to their immense popularity with our people, there is doubt in the party controlling the votes as their votes seem to be decreasing in the past few years, as younger voters, uninfluenced by the party's past deeds have been voting. 

The only thing I have against the current party is how they convicted "communists" without much solid evidence, as a push for independence from the British. Feel free to discuss about this topic with me, calmly.


Tuesday, March 30, 2021

MAGA Inc.: The Anti-Semite vs. The Sodomite

 This is what the MAGA Inc. Turf (or should I write "Terf?") war has descended into:

We have anti-Semite Nick Fuentes getting into an argument with sodomite "Conservative" Drag Queen Lady MAGA. Really. 



I thought the fight was all about making America Great Again--or at least making American good again. Alex de Toqueville wrote about the importance of a "good" America, so that America would remain great. Despising ethnic groups is not going to make America good again. Promoting sexual perversion is not going to make America good again, either. Please, we can do better than this, can't we? 

 And things are looking even more bleak as younger conservatives and populist-leaning nationalists wanting to force up the federal minimum wage to $15 an hour, and they are also talking about Medicaid expansions and other Big Government programs.

Yes, We the People need to stand up to the anti-Constitutional abuses of Big Business. There are better ways to do that, besides giving the government more power. The states need their power restored. The balance of power needs to be reoriented back to the states and the people. Is that too far-fetched a goal? Perhaps.

One thing is for sure, though: the increased ideological conflicts among Conservative Inc., MAGA Inc., and now America First Inc. is really tiresome. All of this bickering among broken and corrupted elements looking to push their own narrow agenda, all of which falls outside of the domain of natural law and natural rights, is hurting the larger cause.

Sure, people can go after Charlie Kirk, but even he had a point, i.e. Groypers should be going after their Congressmen and US Senators. They should be raising hell at their local school boards, too. The government belongs to We the People, not Some of Us Grifters.

And the Conservative Movement by and large has descended into more grift, more making money all while claiming to be getting the job done to fight all the perverse, abominable moves undermining our country.

The whole show is just more grift, nothing more.

The Conservative Movement just cannot seem to get its act together. Everyone wants to hold conferences. No one wants to organize their citizenship political might and fight back. Everyone wants to argue about their pet niche within conservatism. No one wants to fight in the public square, the public schools, the courts of public opinion to make the case for the American values that make America Great.

Instead, we have one set of  new grifters calling another set of grifters "grifters". Give me a break. And they have more incendiary views which shock and disgust people, and all of that flash without panache is just to make more money.

The grift needs to be sifted out until conservatives start to value gaining power to accomplish good, as opposed to making money to purchase more goods.

We can do better than Lady MAGA. We can do better than Nick Fuentes. We can do better than Groypers, Groupies, Stoners, and Stupids. We can do better than anti-Semites and Sodomites.

We can do better than Charlie Kirk and Ben Shapiro, too. We don't need more conferences, discussions, and philosophy. It's time to push back on the levers of power and take control of our government, our country, and our communities.

Otherwise, the fight to advance conservatism is going to descend into a bum's rush between sodomites and anti-Semities. We can do better, we can push for better, and we can make better happen.

Tuesday, November 12, 2019

Open Letter to Singapore Minister of Law K Shanmugam Re: Foreign Influence and 377A

Mr. K. Shanmugam, the Minister of Law in Singapore, is charged with enforcing legislation, including the expansion of a law which forbids foreign influence in Singapore's politics.




And yet ... the country allowed a lesbian lawyer from India to visit and speak about their efforts to repeal the anti-sodomy law in their country.

And how convenient that this takes place at the same time that Singapore's courts are hearing three cases to determine whether the anti-sodomy law should be struck down as constitutional, as well.

Why would the Singapore government allow her into the country, since it is quite obvious that this woman is trying to push the same agenda in that country?

A number of pro-family groups and activists signalled their outrage, and they even sponsored a petition:



Following this, I posted the following open letter to the Minister:


Mr. Shanmugam, as a foreigner myself, would I now be permitted to speak in favor of #377a in your country? Or would you discriminate against me for defending natural law and public order?

In fact, I would militantly urge you to begin some degree of enforcement of this law, since sexual perversion, acts of gross indecency between men should be discouraged at all costs.

As an American, I can fully attest that the forced decriminalization of sodomy has created more problems in our country. In fact, we in the United States have a growing community of pro-family activists throughout disgusted with the advance of sexual perversion in the name of "Love is Love." From shameful gay "pride" parades to the spread of venereal disease, broken homes, advanced mental illness, the breakdown of civic bonds in many cities--the push to normalize LGBT has simply allowed the abnormal to dictate and demean what is good and right.

Mr. Shanmugam, would you please explain to me why you are so determined to placate a small group of sexual deviants instead of honoring the public good and natural law?

Mr. Shanmugam, why are you so determined to undermine the rule of law and the public good, all in the name of "social justice"?

Why would any nation want to treat mental illness as a civil right?

Your Forefather Lee Kuan Yew intended an orderly society, one in which economic liberty with cultural restraint ensured blessings for the greatest number. Why would you seek to undermine this?

For the love of God and all that is Good, maintain #377A.

Sincerely,

Arthur Scha
per

Sunday, October 13, 2019

Singapore's LGBT "Historian" Proves "Not Born That Way" (Inadvertently Shows Support for 377A)

Singapore, an economic and cultural miracle in Southeast Asian, is facing some heavy cultural head  winds. One of the a number of countries around the world which still criminalizes sodomy.

What's interesting about Singapore it that the country is not a third-world backwater, but a first-world powerhouse in the region.

Furthermore, some of the most able minds in the country, whether in the university or in parliament have spoken out forcefully against homosexuality and have rigorously, effectively defended maintaining the anti-sodomy laws on the books.

For more information on Prof. Theo Li-Ann's spirited and well-informed defense, click here.

Recently, I discovered one of the oldest, most vocal pro-LGBT advocates--and activists--in Singapore.

His name is Roy Tan:

Mr. Tan Demanding Repeal of 377A in ... 2008!



Roy Tan is the so-called historian of LGBT in Singapore.

Really.

What kind of history does he have?

He shares it openly, and what he shares is nothing short of horrifying, providing proof that these behaviors are not innate, but rather acquired, and ultimately destructive.

Furthermore, his account on "Dear Straight People" shows not just the militant opposition to defending natural marriage and healthy intercourse among adults, but also why Singapore is doing the right thing to keep the anti-sodomy laws, aka 377A, on the nation's books.

First, let's look at his childhood, as told by himself, by the way:

Roy was just 5-years old when he first experienced same-sex attraction.

A five-year old having sexual feelings? This is unseemly and unfounded. The hormonal developments which invite sexual feelings and physical growth does not take place until puberty.

What does Tan claim that he had "same-sex attraction"? There is nothing wrong with fellow-feeling for other men. There is also nothing wrong with having a profound admiration or affirmation for someone of the same sex. Deep friendships are founded on that kind of love.

Trips to the swimming pool were a frequent family affair. And it was there that Roy had his first brush with homosexuality.

Reminder: we are talking about a child, a five-year old. This account is becoming more disturbing.

Tan shares:

I would stare in fascination at the men walking around in the changing room, especially at their bushy pubes and large genitalia – appendages which I noticed I lacked as a child.

I have heard a similar account to this.

Vincent Yang of Taiwan shared a similar story from his childhood:


In the first part of his testimony, Vincent talks about the disturbing effect of showering with older relatives in public showers. He noticed the erect members of his older sibling, and he became engrossed with the private parts of other men.

From this fascination, he entered into liaisons with men in public toilets, then one-night stands with other men. Like Vincent, Roy's "initiation" into same-sex attraction began in a public shower around other men, but notice also that Roy mentions a sense of shame: "appendages which I noticed I lacked as a child."

It's not a wise idea to have children shower around strangers. This sense of shame emerges, and it causes great harm in the future for the person. There is something wrong, even destructive, about allowing children, boys and girls, to be around so many naked strangers at one time. And that's what happened to Roy.

His attraction to the same gender grew stronger with age. By the time he started primary school, Roy was already busy experimenting with his male classmates.

"Same gender"? What? There is biological sex. That is a static, genetic characteristic. Why alter that?

Gender is the term used to suggest that male and female are mere constructs. That is not true.

"Experimenting"? Is that what the interview calls sexual conduct between boys? The attitude about this is all wrong from the outside. Children should not be "experimenting" with their bodies at all. The physical pleasure gives way to a sense of loss, shame, and longing which cannot be assuaged or ignored without something better.

I am still in shock reading "experimenting with his male classmates". This is tragic, and yet a very common feature in the lives of many homosexuals.

Roy shares:

"When I attended school from Primary 1 (First Grade in the United States) onwards, I always had a best friend in class which I would become strongly attracted to.


"We would proceed to explore each other’s bodies when the occasion was appropriate in a very innocent way, mainly out of curiosity. I had no inkling at the time that it was a sexual interaction."

"A best friend", Roy writes. He had many such encounters, then? Was there more than one "best friend"? This is really disturbing. Roy was abused, and now he is acting out this sense of shame on others. If a teacher in the United States found out that a child was behaving like this toward other students, the parents would have been informed immediately. I wonder if teachers in Roy's classes did find out about this.

I submit to you that Roy's interactions were not really "sexual", but rather a curiousity borne out by a lack of wisdom and training, particularly when it comes to boundaries. This kind of behavior is neither normal nor healthy among children. Especially first graders!

Despite the fact that Roy grew up at a time when gay apps haven’t yet permeated the gay scene, Roy was never short of company.

His peculiar trend of engaging in carnal activities with his best friend at each stage of his life was something that would continue right up through to his Army days.

This passage points out clearly that homosexuality is promiscuous. There is little in the way of fidelity or integrity when it comes to these kinds of interactions. Homosexuals have a number of sexual interactions with different men throughout their "tenure" in that lifestyle.

That does not sound like love. That does not sound like a set of behaviors to promote in any culture.

Then Rouy shares this:

"As I progressed from primary to secondary school and then pre-university and National Service, my best friend would change but the intensity of the relationship and the love I felt was the same with each new, unique person.

"The main problem about my relationships with my best friends was that even though we shared carnal pleasure, none of them identified as gay and they all got married to women later on in life."

Roy admits inadvertently, perhaps, but he admits it nonetheless: that people are not born gay. The men he slept with got married and had children later on. A number of studies do point out that women engage in homosexual encounters in certain settings, too, and then marry and have children. Men can engage sexually with other men, but then return to natural relations with women, too. Why would anyone want to disrupt this blessed arrangement?

Earlier in this post, I had asked about Roy's parents. Where were they when Roy was "experimenting" with other boys? Did they know about his homsoexual activities?

Yes, they did.

Born to a Buddhist family, his parents believed in the typical Chinese syncretism of Buddhism, Daoism and Confucianism. Thus, homosexuality was never considered a sin in the household and Roy was free from the religion induced guilt that haunts many other gay youths.

The sense of shame is a natural response. It's not the fault of "religion." Furthermore, this statement suggests Tan's hostility to people of faith. Very troubling.

During his twenties and thirties, Roy would often bring men back to his home to spend an intimate night with. Although his parents were well aware of what their son was doing behind closed doors, they never showed much of a reaction.

Or did they?

In fact, Roy's parents were quite indulgent! Roy shares:

“On one occasion when I brought a boy home for the night and was going down on him in my bedroom, my father peeped through the keyhole to see what we were up to.

“When I suddenly opened the door to go to the toilet, my father quickly stood up sheepishly from his crouched, spying position and walked away.”

Roy's father knew what his son was doing. Instead of doing something about it, he walked away. That is not love. No wonder Roy was looking for love in other men. What kind of father would allow his son to dishonor his body in such a fashion-and say nothing? That's just unloving, to say the least. 

The Bible, of course, calls such parental inaction "hate".

"He that spareth his rod hateth his son: but he that loveth him chasteneth him betimes." (Proverbs 13:24)

Since his parents did not care that their son was so promiscuous, it really shows what little love they had for their son!

The "Dear Straight People" continues with details about Roy Tan's political activism. From the underground gay bars to chat boards to parades, Tan has taken every step possible to promote and normalize homosexual relations. He know serves as the unofficial LGBT historian for Singapore, as well.

Analysis:

First of all, Tan gives away the fact that homosexuality is not a stable affair. The behavior is rife with promiscuity. Second, it's a lifestyle which is demeaning to women. He was dating a women because of pressure, but spent so much of his time hanging out with one of his best friends. His girlfriend at the time was very annoyed about this. Tan recounts:

"She was rather envious of my best friend and would wonder why we spent so much time together.

"She used to ask, “Why do you always listen to him?” I didn’t have the heart to reply, “Because I love him more than you'".

How selfish is that?

But let's be candid here. Mr. Tan offers the argument which LGBT activists around the world are throwing out to the public: that being gay is a civil right.

It's certainly not an immutable characteristic, as proven by his carnal encounters with other men who went on to marry and have children.

The origins of this behavior stem from one who was not loved, not reared to be a strong, stable, capable adult. Just because homosexuals also engage in more noble pursuits (working, recreational activities, etc.) does not mean that 377A should be repealed.

Many people are functioning alcoholics, drug addicts, and even porn addicts. People commit other crimes in secret, and then go about their daily lives in public with little reason for scrutiny.

Prof. Thio Li-Ann, at one time a member if Singapore's Parliament, gave a rousing, comprehensive defense of 377A. Her words of wisdom and caution should be accepted and shared. For the entire speech, click here.

To summarize, Mr. Tan's defense of repeal for 377A leaves much to be desired. The behaviors are inherently destructive, the lifestyle draws individuals into aberrant, destructive patterns. Because the basis for LGBT as a civil right is based on the "born that way" argument, Mr. Tan has no real argument to make for striking down 377A.

Friday, October 4, 2019

MassResistance: Straight Pride Parade Speeches

BOSTON "STRAIGHT PRIDE" PARADE ATTRACTS FLOOD OF LUNATIC ANTIFA ATTACKERS

Part 4: The “Straight Pride” speeches in City Hall Plaza

Amazing job by police to keep attackers away! Incredible speech by Milo Yiannopoulos -- who is openly homosexual -- on the uncomfortable LGBT truths others won't talk about.

See video below of Milo's speech!

September 26, 2019
The police did quite an amazing job of keeping the Antifa hoodlums far enough away that the speeches were able to go on undisturbed. It's disgusting that such extreme security was necessary in a city that considers itself the birthplace of freedom in America. But they did it.
ALT TEXT The stage for the Straight Pride speeches, set up on the north side of City Hall in City Hall Plaza.
ALT TEXT The crowd in front of the stage. It would have been much bigger but it was difficult for people to get in. Note the police in the background.
ALT TEXT Can you get more politically incorrect than this?
ALT TEXT This fellow was clearly having more fun than should be allowed in Boston!
ALT TEXT Hal Shurtleff (left) and his son (right) run Camp Constitution for kids. Boston Mayor Walsh has refused their request to raise their Christian flag over City Hall, although the "gay" rainbow flag, the "transgender" flag, and the flags for Communist China and Cuba were all allowed. Of course, Walsh also denied the Straight Pride flag request.
ALT TEXT The Super Happy Fun America organizers welcome the crowd!

The Speeches

Before the event (and even afterwards) the Boston media, politicians, and liberal establishment all parroted the Leftist line that the Straight Pride event was really about "white supremicism" as well as "anti-woman." That was generally presented as fact.
Really?? Below are the speakers that day. Do they look like white supremacists or anti-woman to you? The smears are, as usual, all nonsense.
Their speeches were mostly about how great America is and their personal experiences overcoming adversity. (Unfortunately we didn't get all their names. Milo was the final speaker.)
ALT TEXT
ALT TEXT
ALT TEXT The famous "Barbara from Harlem"!
ALT TEXT
ALT TEXT
ALT TEXT This speaker is a member of the "Proud Boys" organization, which is known for showing up around the country and confronting Antifa thugs. The Left universally smears the Proud Boys as being a "white supremacist" group. A bit hard to believe, actually, but Leftists never let facts get in the way of emotion.
ALT TEXT
ALT TEXT
ALT TEXT
ALT TEXT This is the lawyer who successfully helped the Straight Pride group fight the maze of obstacles the Mayor tried to put in their way.

Speech by Milo!

The last speaker was Milo Yiannopoulos, the Grand Marshall of the Parade (and an openly homosexual, "married" to a man). Milo is a well-known political conservative (wearing a MAGA hat), and is also brutally honest about the destructive nature of the LGBT agenda, lifestyle, and behaviors.
ALT TEXT Milo insisted on a podium, and the organizers were happy to comply the best they could.

===== WATCH VIDEO: =====

Speech by Milo Yiannopoulos at Straight Pride in Boston (9:29 min)


ALT TEXT Brian Camenker of MassResistance shares a few laughs with Milo.
ALT TEXT This is what Milo was pointing to from the stage during his speech. Even after the speeches were done, the Antifa throng continued their harangue outside the barriers.
ALT TEXT Wrapped in Straight Pride flags. These kids would probably get suspended for doing this at school!
ALT TEXT Camenker of MassResistance with the "white supremacist" Proud Boys member.
Facebook Twitter Google Reddit Email Print
Please help us continue to do our uncompromising work!
Our successes depend on people like you.
Your support will make the difference!

Monday, February 18, 2019

American Family Association Annouces Assault Against Drag Queen Story Hour

Yes, this is coming to a library near you if you do not take a stand. This abuse of power and the corruption of children's minds must be confronted at all costs!

American Family Association
Decadent behavior: Drag queens and public libraries
Monday, February 18, 2019
Decadent behavior: Drag queens and public libraries
Dear Arthur,
More and more often, our nation is becoming awash with "Drag Queen Story Hours" at local public and school libraries. These, as you might guess, involve men dressed up as garishly adorned women who read LGBTQ-themed books to young children under the guise of performing a public service.
In just the past few months, such activities have occurred in places like Evansville, IN, Astoria, OR, Houston, TX, Mobile, AL. Sadly, even the American Library Association heartily endorses the events and has a webpage dedicated to their promotion.
The obvious goal here is to convince an entire generation of children that transvestites are perfectly normal. It's an attempt to promote deviancy before most of the children in the library even know what deviancy is.
Some drag queens have admitted that their goal is to "groom" the next generation. According to LifeSiteNews.com, drag queen Dylan Pontiff told the Lafayette City-Parish Council in Louisiana, "This is going to be the grooming of the next generation. We are trying to groom the next generation."
Pontiff helped organize one of these story hour events for children as young as three at the Lafayette Public Library. He made this shocking admission during a Sept. 17 meeting.
TAKE ACTION
1. Ensure that your family and friends are aware of the danger of this indoctrination and "grooming" of our children. Check regularly with your local public and school librarian to learn if drag queens are scheduled to hold "Drag Queen Story Hours."
2. AFA has a resource to educate family and friends on this topic. In this AFA Cultural Institute DVD, Preparing Your Children for the Transgender Revolution, Christian author and apologist Tom Gilson explains what parents need to know and what children need to hear about the transgender revolution. The one-hour presentation equips parents with the knowledge they need to confidently address the issue with grace and truth.
Additional resources/articles from AFA's The Stand:
If our mission resonates with you, please consider supporting our work financially with a tax-deductible donation. The easiest way to do that is through online giving. It is easy to use, and most of all, it is secure.


Tim Wildmon, President
American Family Association

Wednesday, December 19, 2018

MassResistance Full Report: Kangaroo Court Against Canadian Christian -- LGBT Bigotry Heading To USA?!

MASSRESISTANCE SPECIAL REPORT:

Bill Whatcott endures terrifying “hate speech” hearing before the British Columbia Human Rights Tribunal

For passing out flyers (with Bible verses) during election campaign

People around the world should pay attention to what Canada has become!

Exclusive on-the-scene report

December 15, 2018
It is breathtaking how totalitarian and vicious Canada has become against religious and pro-family beliefs. Its government has completely embraced the radical LGBT ideological agenda.
Whatcott, head of our Canada MassResistance chapter, is a fearless light in a sea of darkness in that country.
Whatcott's hearing is scheduled for at least five days – Tuesday through Monday, Dec. 11-14 and Dec. 17, 2018. Our MassResistance reporter Amy Contrada traveled to Vancouver, attended the trial, and also interviewed Bill extensively.
The trial
Trial - Day 1: Day 1: First comes "prohibited speech," then "compelled speech"
The bias of the judges was on display. Plus photos & video interview
Trial - Day 2: Oger's complaints; then Bill's eloquent testimony
Two completely different worldviews. Plus photos & video interview
Day 3: The judges reject Whatcott's expert witness, a well-qualified psychiatrist
He needed specialty training on "love, hate, and social prejudice," they said.
Day 4: Judges allow sudden new evidence against Whatcott
His recent flyer, blog post, videos - considered a "serious offense" against the panel.
On Friday, Dec. 14, the judges unexpectedly announced that they were extending it for one more day – Monday, Dec. 17 (and possibly longer). Only Bill’s lawyer, Dr. Charles Lugosi, and one other “intervenor” (from the Canadian Association for Freedom of Expression) were allowed to speak on Bill’s behalf.
Typically, these tribunals take approximately six months to announce their findings. Bill thinks his will end as soon as January 2019 – because the three-judge panel had made up their minds even before the proceeding.
If found guilty, Bill could face fines of hundreds of thousands of dollars, and possible eventual jail time. We will keep you updated on developments in this very important case.
Also:
Bill’s speech on Dec. 1, 2018 before pro-family conference in Calgary
“The history of homosexual activism in Canada – and my upcoming trial.”
The history of homosexual activism in Canada
Transcript of Bill Whatcott’s Dec.1 speech

ALT TEXTThe BC Human Rights Tribunal is located in a downtown Vancouver office building.
ALT TEXT
ALT TEXTYou had to have a ticket to attend!
Facebook Twitter Google Reddit Email Print
Please help us continue to do our uncompromising work!
Your support will make the difference!