Stand Against Hate: Sign Petition Against Minneapolis "Fire White First" Teacher Policy

 I really commend LifeSiteNews for setting up this petition.

Racism is racism, whether directed against white people or black people. When someone is discriminated against just because of his skin color, that is racist.

And yet, it is wrong to be racist to white people.

Once again, I commend LifeSiteNews for having the courage to speak up for all Americans, regardless of their skin color, and include in their efforts a strong rebuff against anti-white hatred, too.

STAND AGAINST RACISM IN ACADEMIA!   Dear Friend, The Minneapolis Teachers Union is destroying education by deliberately targeting and firing white teachers first over others — regardless of skill, talent, and experience — specifically because of the color of their skin. Racist policies are destroying our children's education and Minneapolis is America's worst offender. With this new policy, experience and talent WILL NOT be the first indicators for keeping qualified teachers on staff to educate children. Skin color is now the most important characteristic for teachers in Minneapolis unless we make a change. Please SIGN and SHARE this urgent petition: Express your disgust with this illegal and unconstitutional policy embrace of reverse racism in their bargaining practices!   SIGN THE PETITION NOW! Here is what we're fighting against: A recent strike by the Minneapolis Federation of Teachers (MFT) resulted in an agreement with Minneapolis Public Schools which states that, going forward, white teachers specifically will be LAID OFF first as a means to advance the liberal MFT's "diversity" agenda. Not only is this alarmingly regressive, it is also illegal and unconstitutional — a clear violation of Civil Rights.   LEARN MORE ABOUT THIS RACIST AGREEMENT HERE! This is a dangerous precedent to set, and completely un-American. It's time for men and women of all skin colors to take a stand against racism and say "ENOUGH'S ENOUGH!" Please SIGN and SHARE this urgent petition telling the MFT and Minneapolis Public Schools that you demand teachers be judged by their experience and the content of their character, not the color of their skin. Thank you, Michael J. DaPos & The LifePetitions Team Click HERE to SIGN this petition now!

BREAKING: New President and CEO of Southern Poverty Law Center Poses with Anti-White, Anti-Semite Nick Cannon

Margaret Huang (left) with Anti-White, Anti-Semite Nick Cannon

 Now, if this is not shocking, I don't know what is.

Margaret Huang was recently hired to serve as the new President and CEO of the Southern Poverty Law Center.

They had to fire Co-Founder Morris Dees because he was a racist, misogynist, and he harassed a number of women in the organization.

Of course, Richard Cohen the previous CEO, and Rhonda Brownstein also resigned, presumably because they did nothing about the numerous complaints against Morris Dees, but more importantly because they did not live up to their open, inclusive, tolerant standards which they are fighting to impose on everyone else.

Now, no one should assume that the Southern Poverty Law Center is tolerant or inclusive, since they are more interested in shutting down people and organizations which they disagree with. That's what it all amounts to.

In an attempt to cover up their legacy of defamation, racism, and hypocritical hatred, the SPLC has hired a whole new array of majority-minority leadership. Still, these direct steps to play cover-up are insufficient, since such actions are still essentially ... racist.

The new President and CEO of the Southern Poverty Law Center is Margaret Huang:

In her first interview as the newly installed President and CEO, Huang asserted that it was a dream come true for her to work with the SPLC. She had been working with Amnesty International before, and now she is committed to fighting hate wherever she can as the leader of the SPLC.

If she wants to fight hate, she should start with herself.

On her own Facebook page, she features her picture with this rabid anti-Semitic and anti-white hatemonger:

Yes, she still has this picture posted, prominently, on her Facebook page:

Who is the man standing next to Margaret Huang in the photo? The infamous Nick Cannon.

Here's how he became infamous this year with a number of hateful comments. 

The Daily Caller reports:

Former “America’s Got Talent” host Nick Cannon delivered a racist and anti-Semitic rant in a June 30 episode of his podcast, “Cannon’s Class.”

 Cannon hosted rapper Professor Griff, whose record of anti-Semitic comments is well documented, for an interview in which they promoted anti-Semitic conspiracies about Jewish families secretly controlling the world and claimed that black people can’t be anti-Semitic because they’re the real Semitic people.

“In order for me to be anti-Semitic, I’d have to be anti-black man, anti-black woman, anti-black people, anti-Africa, anti-all other people,” Griff said.

“Because the Semitic people are black people,” Cannon added.

That depends. There is a considerable Ethiopian Jewish community, for example. Operation Solomon, conducted with the help of the United States during the George H.W. Bush administration, helped rescuse a considerable population of Ethiopian Jews and bring them to Israel, for example.

A friends of mine was the descent of Jews from the nation of Mali, as well. But just because someone is black does not mean that they are Jewish, not at all. That's a racist statement in itself.

Cannon and Griff spoke positively of Nation of Islam leader Louis Farrakhan, a notorious anti-Semite, throughout the interview, which has garnered more than 250,000 views on YouTube alone. (RELATED: These Big Name Rappers Are Tight With Anti-Semite Louis Farrakhan)

Unbelievable. Farrakhan has called Jews "termites". Who knows what other hateful things he has said about people who do not look like him or have his color shade of skin.

 “When you have a person who has the lack of pigment, the lack of melanin that they know they will be annihilated, therefore they know that however they got the power, they have a lack of compassion, melanin comes with compassion,” Cannon said.

Here we go with the false "white supremacy" narrative, pushing this notion that someone is inferior just because of the person's skin color. Racist, go home!

“Melanin comes with soul, that we call it soul, we soul brothers and sisters, that’s the melanin that connects us so the people that don’t have it, are, and I’m going to say this carefully, are a little less and where the term actually comes from, and I’m going to bring it back around to Minister Farrakhan, where they may not have the compassion,” he added.

He considers Farrakhan an expert source on these issues. Really. What does SPLC President Margaret Huang think of all this?

 “When they were sent to the Mountains of Caucasus, they didn’t have the power of the sun. The sun started to deteriorate them. So, they’re acting out of fear, they’re acting out of low self-esteem, they’re acting out of deficiency, so therefore the only way they can act is evil,” Cannon continued.

Oh, so people with lighter skin are afraid of the sun now? Wow, this is not just racist, it's just plain madness!

 Scholars have long debunked the pseudo-scientific claim that skin melanin levels are linked to intellectual abilities.

Indeed, I have debate on these issues and have routinely debunked them. Intellect is about so much more than the melanin count in a person's skin.

 “They have to rob, steal, rape, kill and fight in order to survive. So these people who didn’t have what we have, and when I say ‘we,’ I speak of the melinated people, they had to be savages, they had to be barbaric because they’re in these Nordic mountains, they’re in these rough torrential environments, so they’re acting as animals, so they’re the ones closer to animals, they’re the ones that are actually the true savages,” Cannon said in the video.

“So I say all that to say the context when we speak of ‘Jewish people,’ white people, Europeans, the Illuminati — they were doing that as survival tactics to stay on this planet,” Cannon added.

And there you have it. Jewish people, white people in general are all "savages".

Unbelievable. This is pure hate.

Here's his entire racist rant. Click here.

So the question stands:

Why is Margaret Huang, the head of a so-called civil rights organization, taking photos and fraternizing with hatemongers, anti-Semites like Nick Cannon? Does she support Louis Farakhan and his hate, as well? Does she cast a blind eye on bigotry if it comes from someone who has darker skin that she?

That is also racist.

The Southern Poverty Law Center has already ruined its reputation with the perverted, bigoted legacy of its now fired co-founder Morris Dees. The President and the Legal Director also had to resign for not taking a stand against hate within their own organization.

And now their new President and CEO has neither sense nor sensibility to denounce the bigotry and hatred of Nick Cannon. In fact, she feels no shame, no qualms about posing with someone with such hateful views, someone who actually praised notorious Islamic militant and anti-Semite Louis Farakhan.

The SPLC is off to a very bad start with their current leadership, that is certain. All the more, this revelation merely proves that the Southern Poverty Law Center is really a hate group in its own right, with no interest in actually fostering true dialogue and discussion on major issues, but rather insists on shutting down dissent, discovery, and determination against anyone and everyone who wants to exercise their God-given natural rights of Freedom of Speech, Assembly, and the like.

Racism: It's Fit to Print for the New York Times (Andrew Sullivan's Take)

The inimitable Andrew Sullivan once again shames the left and the pandering press.

I don't agree with many of his views, though. He is openly gay, and he supports the definition of marriage. For some reason, he justifies taking the Bible to promote his cultural liberalism, even though the Scriptures, whether Old or New Testaments, do not fall into the policies and principles which he advocates.

On top of all these differences, Sullivan voted for Obama because he believed that the Republican Party has become too right wing. Huh? What kind of thinking is all of this? It still boggles my mind to this day.

But ...

He has published savage yet accurate criticisms of the current political Left, which has gone so far that they have undermined the reason why political spectra exist. Governments exist to protect our rights or to provide goods to the members of the state, depending on one's political, cultural, and ideological leanings.

With the way that the regressive Left has titled so far toward socialism, redistribution, and a complete from biological and historical reality, they have basically declare war on government, hierarchy, and the role of the individual within the state altogether.

They have called borders "racist."

They have denounced freedom of speech as destructive, even though they exercise their freedom of speech to make their case for ending, or at least limiting, freedom of speech.

They are eating their own, criticizing their forebearers like Bernie Sanders because they are "too white". The children of the revolution eat their own parents, or is it the parents which eat their children?

Either way, the Left is losing what is left of its collective (and collectivist) mind.

When Racism Is Fit to Print

Is the newest member of the New York Times editorial board, Sarah Jeong, a racist?

Yes. She is. She said that white people need to die. She wants them gone. She said nasty things about older men and women who were white. She unfairly, arbitrarily commiserated with criminals just because they had darker skin color.

That is also racist, of course.

Unlike most other editorial intelligentsia in New York City, Sullivan was not afraid to call out the brazen, blatant racism of their new editorial boar member.

From one perspective — that commonly held by people outside the confines of the political left — she obviously is. A series of tweets from 2013 to 2015 reveal a vicious hatred of an entire group of people based only on their skin color. If that sounds harsh, let’s review a few, shall we? “White men are bullshit,” is one. A succinct vent, at least. But notice she’s not in any way attacking specific white men for some particular failing, just all white men for, well, existing. Or this series of ruminations: “have you ever tried to figure out all the things that white people are allowed to do that aren’t cultural appropriation. there’s literally nothing. like skiing, maybe, and also golf. white people aren’t even allowed to have polo. did you know that. like don’t you just feel bad? why can’t we give white people a break. lacrosse isn’t for white people either. it must be so boring to be white.” Or this: “basically i’m just imagining waking up white every morning with a terrible existential dread that i have no culture.” I can’t say I’m offended by this — it’s even mildly amusing, if a little bonkers. (Has she read, say, any Shakespeare or Emily Dickinson?) But it does reveal a worldview in which white people — all of them — are cultural parasites and contemptibly dull.

In the previous paragraph, Sullivan brings up tweets from the hateful Sarah Jeong which I had not found yet. Other people had not exposed these tweets, either. "I'm just imagining waking up white ..."

Wow!

By the way, I am so much more than the color of my skin, so I really don't care for this push for "white" culture or white pride. I am proud to be an American, and being an American is more than skin deep.

A little more disturbing is what you might call “eliminationist” rhetoric — language that wishes an entire race could be wiped off the face of the earth: “#cancelwhitepeople.”

There's a better word for that. It's called "genocide."

Check out another tweet exposing this racist reporter's growing disdain for white people, across a number of months.

Roseanne Bar made non-racial jokes, get called "racist" & got her show cancelled.

The New York Times hires an actual racist, Sarah Jeong attacks white people, saying "Dumbass fucking white people marking up the internet with their opinions like dogs pissing on fire hydriants". pic.twitter.com/o7GdoOizcU

— Seth Francis Sutter🌐 (@WeWuzSpartan) August 4, 2018

Another indicator that these statements might be racist comes from replacing the word “white” with any other racial group. #cancelblackpeople probably wouldn’t fly at the New York Times, would it? Or imagine someone tweeting that Jews were only “fit to live underground like groveling goblins” or that she enjoyed “being cruel to old Latina women,” and then being welcomed and celebrated by a liberal newsroom. Not exactly in the cards.

If any reporter had written such hateful rhetoric about black or Hispanic people, then the New York Times had insisted on hiring that person, there would be riots in the streets. There would be stacks of New York Times newspapers burning on corners throughout the Big Apple.

Of course, the outrage would have reached the most fevered pitch if hired journalist were white. Who knows how badly anyone would have reacted if the reporter were in fact black of Hispanic and were writing about the other race.

But the alternative view — that of today’s political left — is that Jeong definitionally cannot be racist, because she’s both a woman and a racial minority. Racism against whites, in this neo-Marxist view, just “isn’t a thing” — just as misandry literally cannot exist at all. And this is because, in this paradigm, racism has nothing to do with a person’s willingness to pre-judge people by the color of their skin, or to make broad, ugly generalizations about whole groups of people, based on hoary stereotypes. 

Rather, racism is entirely institutional and systemic, a function of power, and therefore it can only be expressed by the powerful — i.e., primarily white, straight men. For a nonwhite female, like Sarah Jeong, it is simply impossible. In the religion of social constructionism, Jeong, by virtue of being an Asian woman, is one of the elect, incapable of the sin of racism or group prejudice. All she is doing is resisting whiteness and maleness, which indeed require resistance every second of the day.

Sullivan gets it perfectly. In fact, I have listened to deranged social justice warriors define racism like that. It has nothing to do with judging or demeaning people because of the color of one's skin, and everything to do with going after people in supposed positions of power. In the case of modern academia and SJW nullities, white people are permanently in positions of power, and therefore they should endure routine discrimination, shame, and abuse.

That’s why Jeong hasn’t apologized to the white people she denigrated or conceded that her tweets were racist. Nor has she taken responsibility for them. Her statement actually blames her ugly tweets on trolls whose online harassment of her prompted her to respond in turn. She was merely “counter-trolling.” She says her tweets, which were not responses to any individual, were also “not aimed at a general audience,” and now understands that these tweets were “hurtful” and won’t do them again. The New York Times also buys this argument: “her journalism and the fact that she is a young Asian woman have made her a subject of frequent online harassment. For a period of time, she responded to that harassment by imitating the rhetoric of her harassers.”

The New York Times stopped caring about arguments, logic, and facts a long time ago. They have not interest in maintaining any kind of pretense of honesty, objectivity, or integrity.

Here's another interesting take from Sullivan about Sarah Jeong:

And I don’t think the New York Times should fire her — in part because they largely share her views on race, gender, and oppression. Their entire hiring and editorial process is based on them. In their mind, Jeong was merely caught defending herself. As Vox writer Zack Beauchamp put it: “A lot of people on the internet today [are] confusing the expressive way antiracists and minorities talk about ‘white people’ with actual race-based hatred, for some unfathomable reason.” I have to say that word “expressive” made me chuckle out loud. (But would Beauchamp, I wonder, feel the same way if anti-racists talked about Jews in the same manner Jeong talks about whites? Aren’t Jews included in the category of whites?)

How should the New York Times deal with their latest, racist failure? I see nothing wrong with an en masse boycott of the newspaper. Then again, does anyone read this paper to begin with? Hasn't there already been a Walk Away movement from the liberal press at the outset?

The SJW mind-numbing insanity of perennial outrage and hurt feelings has gone mainstream.

Don't say that we didn't warn you.

Yes, we all live on campus now. The neo-Marxist analysis of society, in which we are all mere appendages of various groups of oppressors and oppressed, and in which the oppressed definitionally cannot be at fault, is now the governing philosophy of almost all liberal media. That’s how the Washington Post can provide a platform for raw misandry, and the New York Times can hire and defend someone who expresses racial hatred. The great thing about being in the social justice movement is how liberating it can feel to give voice to incendiary, satisfying bigotry — and know that you’re still on the right side of history.

Funny, but deadly if it continues unchecked.

It's time for all good-minded people to chuck the New York Times for good.

Final Reflection

Andrew Sullivan may finally be waking up and realizing that he needed to move to the right, rather than pointing the finger at the Republican Party and telling its base to move more to the Left.

The fact is that political elites and cronyism in both parties have pushed their own agenda, enriching themselves with our tax dollars and excusing themselves from the laws that they pass for us. The game is over, and President Trump is upending this Potomac Two-Step con game.

The press has been complicit in it, and the political class went along with it. Conservatives who wanted to change Washington and end business as usual realized that the fight was much bigger than the wheeling and dealing behind closed doors in the halls of Congress.

President Trump gets it. He has defined the narrative so expertly and is taking on every perverse element which has fought against the best interests of American citizens for the last thirty to fifty years.

Now we see that the left-wing media, which has pushed its blunt narrative oh so subtly for the last fift years, no longer hides its arrogant agenda. The New York Times has no problem hiring an irate, embittered Asian female who is more invested in identity politics than telling the truth or reporting the facts. In fact, the only truth which matters these overschooled, under-educated snowflakes appreciate is what will give them more power and allow them an increased sense of entitlement to shut down others.

Thank you, Andrew, for dissecting these dangerous losers so effectively, though.