Showing posts with label Otto Fong. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Otto Fong. Show all posts

Friday, April 22, 2022

Love is Love? Homosexuals Boast About Open Betrayal, i.e. "Open Relationship"


Love is love, right?

That is the constant refrain we here from LGBT activists? Two people who are willing to live in a committed relationship should not be prevented from marrying each other, right?

Wrong.

"Love is love" makes about as much sense as "water is water," when you are comparing bottled water and toilet water. No, they are not the same.

Homosexual conduct is not healthy, not conducive to well-being or long-life. It is not even loving, considering the fact that the behaviors are inherently harmful to the two individuals who abuse each other. There are multiple mental health problems which follow from such conduct, and which cause such conduct.

On average homosexuals have an average of 50 partners. Does that really sound like love?

And consider this brazen admission from an outspoken homosexual activist in Southeast Asia:

Opinion: I’m In An Open Relationship & There’s Absolutely Nothing Wrong With It

My name is Otto Fong and I have been in an open relationship with my partner Han for the past 16 years.

He's very open about being in an open relationship. Wow.

What I am about to say is probably going to earn me a lot of hate. But I believe it’s time someone in the gay community address the elephant in the room that is open relationships. Because this is a conversation that we can all learn a lesson or two about diversity from.

 This homosexual activist acknowledges that homosexuals by and large engage in all kinds of open relationships. In other words, they are NOT faithful to their individual partners, and even with the advent of so-called "gay marriage," (in reality, false marriage), there is no constant of fidelity. NONE!

If gay people see different ideas of relationships as alien or something shameful, how can we ask straight people to see gay relationships differently?

What Is An Open Relationship

For the uninitiated, an open relationship is a relationship in which both partners agree to some form of non-monogamy. Simply put, you can do ABC with other guys besides your partner but not XYZ. For Han and me, our only condition is that we cannot form an emotional attachment with other men. So whatever relations we have with others remains purely physical.

 It's stunning how homosexuals will cladestinely explain how they repeatedly cheat on the very people whom they claim to be committed to.

It's really stunning how Otto Fong admits that he just uses other men. That is not love! That is a form of hate, that is a form of slavery and dishonor. Human beings are not just sex objects, but notice how easily he objectifies other people. "You can do ABC with other guys but not XYZ."

Is that what love amounts to for homosexuals? 

But while open relationships have worked out incredibly well for us, Han is actually the first partner that I’ve ever been in an open relationship with. Before I met Han, I’ve never even considered the prospect of an open relationship with any of my ex-boyfriends.

Whatever emotional needs that Otto or Han or anyone else may have, they discover pretty quickly that those needs can never be met. The emotional harm, the sexual abuse, the confusion that homosexuals have endured at a young age, none of these traumas get resolved in sexual degeneracy and profligacy.

Being an avid reader of gay literature, I’ve come across the concept of open relationships numerous times. But growing up in a heteronormative world, it never occurred to me to try it although it sounded intriguing. I simply accepted that it is taboo and not to be discussed openly.

 Gay literature? He means "pornography," but he won't acknowledge his addiction to pornography ando the illicit materials, because then he would have to admit, whether directly or otherwise, that he is in bondage to destructive behaviors and a degrading false identity.

Nobody in my social circle talked about it. We didn’t start broaching the subject until we were all in our 30s. But when we did, that was when I realised that there are other couples practicing open relationships in the gay community!

Once again, homosexuals often practice adultery and polygamy. There is nothing wholesome or stable about this kind of conduct. Once again, you cannot say that this is love in any form.

Open Relationships In The Gay Community

In retrospect, it makes perfect sense. Do I have solid evidence to back my assumption up? Of course not. Actual data for open relationships in straight or gay relationships are absent. How many straight men have secret wives or families abroad or across the Causeway? How many desperate housewives are friendly with the delivery boys? I do not know.

There is indeed plenty of evidence about homosexuals and open relationships.

30% of Gay Men Are in Open Relationships, According to NewStudy

Why are so many gay couples in open relationships?

Why do so many gay couples open up their relationships?

Open Relationships, Nonconsensual Nonmonogamy, and MonogamyAmong U.S. Adults: Findings from the 2012 National Survey of Sexual Health andBehavior

Gay Men, Parenting, and Open Relationships: Making It Work

NEARLY A THIRD OF GAY MALE COUPLES HAVE OPEN RELATIONSHIPS

When we grew up, there was no culture that was acceptable for gay people. We had to find our ways through trial and error. Nobody was there to tell us what we should do and what we shouldn’t do. We never grew up with a socially accepted notion of how a gay couple should be like.

The biggest impediment among homosexuals for acceptance is from ... homosexuals themselves. Click here.

How can they claim to accept themselves whem they go to great lengths to cheat on one another, fall into repeated patterns of sexual dysfunction

If we had something acceptable by social standards, we might have something to conform to. It’s the same thing for straight couples. Monogamous relationships don’t fit them all. They will try to adhere to that model although some might cheat because that model doesn’t suit them. Free from social restrictions that bind most heterosexual couples, we were free to explore alternative forms of relationships. And it’s evident that some of us chose some form of open relationships.

 

In my view, sex and love are two separate issues. A lot of people like to collapse the two into one whereby you cannot have sex without love. If it works for them, all the power to them. But it might not work for everybody. And research has shown that men are more capable of separating love and sex as compared to women.

 Notice how sex is treated as a debased commodity, rather than commitment to a person. How hateful can one get? Yet this kind of degrading disregard is all too common in homosexual circles. There is something really wrong here. "Love is love"? No, not really.

Now check out what Ricky Martin admitted, too:

Actor/singer Ricky Martin: ‘Open’ relationships should be the norm for homosexuals

'It’s good for the world. It’s good for me as a gay man with kids' to choose to have multiple partners, the Puerto Rican performer said.

No, open relationships are not good for the world, because they are bad for kids and they are bad for a stable society and culture. The utter shamelessness of promoting such selfish degeneracy is the norm, sadly, with homosexuals. It's beyond degrading at this point: it's destructive!

March 2, 2018 (LifeSiteNews) — Singer Ricky Martin says he wants to “normalize” homosexual relationships to the point that each partner has sex with as many others as he or she wishes.

It is not normal for a man and a woman to have multiple partners outside of their marriage. It can never be normal for two people of the same sex to get married, and it certainly can never be normal for two falsely married men or women to claim that they love each other and believe in any kind of familial fidelity all while sleeping around with all kinds of other people.

This is really revoling. It's not love, but a form of self-loathing and emptiness that can never be sated or satisfied. It's really tragic, but it's also quite wicked because of the harm perpetrated on others.

In a lengthy and candid interview by E. Alex Jung of Vulture, the entertainer spoke about his role as murdered fashion designer Gianni Versace’s homosexual partner Antonio D’Amico in FX's “The Assassination of Gianni Versace: American Crime Story.”

Asked about the “open” gay couple D’Amico and Versace, Martin responded personally.  “I want to normalize relationships like this,” Martin said. 

The fact that Martin insists on trying to normalize something just goes to show that it's not normal in the first place, and that it can never be normal.

After Versace’s killing, D’Amico proudly proclaimed, “My relationship was very open and free with Gianni.” D’Amico infamously admitted they bought escorts and brought men for “visits.” 

Nevertheless, the Puerto Rican singer had nothing but high praise for the D’Amico/Versace relationship, in which D’Amico was subservient and Versace was dominant. Martin spoke glowingly of the homosexuals’ “unity,” “security,” and “trust.”

There is no unity when a man abuses his body with other men, and there can be no security or trust, especially when considering the high level of venereal disease that spread and infects homosexual populations. It's laughable, yet not very surprising, to see homosexual activists and advocates redefining words in order to justify themselves.

“We want to normalize … open relationships,” Martin told his Vulture interviewer.  “There’s absolutely nothing wrong. We’re just two very self-secure men that are completely in love with each other, that trust each other to the maximum level … ”

Martin says such promiscuity and unaccountability is a positive, loving thing for homosexuals. “It’s good for the world,” he said. “It’s good for me as a gay man with kids.”

This statement makes it concrete and clear: homosexuals do not want to be accountable to anyone. They just want to please themselves and put aside the needs of everyone else. A number of researchers have pointed out homosexuals

In 2008, Martin paid a woman to carry and give birth to his twin sons, Matteo and Valentino. 

For 14 years, Martin had a steady girlfriend, Mexican TV host and model Rebecca de Alba, but he “came out” as homosexual in 2010. He said going public with his homosexual behavior made him feel liberated. 

“There’s this emptiness; it doesn’t matter what you created. Living with this emptiness, it’s not how I want to live. And then one day you find the strength, you don’t know from where, and you just do it for yourself, you do it for your kids,” he said, adding a quote from murdered San Francisco city councilman Harvey Milk: “‘You need to come out, ‘cause then it’s normal.’“

Emptiness is the norm for homosexuals, as they are trying to deal with attachment issues or overcome the abuse, trauma, and/or neglect and confusion they suffered when they were younger. This emptiness cannot be removed with promiscuity and indiscriminate sex. It just doesn't work.

Final Reflection

Homosexuality is not conducive to real love. Abuse, lies, dishonesty, cheating, adultery, open relationships are the sad norm in this sorry community of harm and lust. It's really a shame, but they need to stop saying "Love is love," as though there is nothing wrong or even different in two men pretending to be married vs. the stable, healthy, moral coupling of one man and one woman in holy matrimony.

Saturday, March 21, 2020

In Letter to Younger Self, Gay Activist Reveals Origins of Same-Sex Desires

In a previous post, I exposed Singaporean Otto Fong, an LGBT activist who played himself up as a victim when he "came out" to the public in 2007. He insisted that he was not a pervert, not a sexual deviant.



However, his subsequent behaviors and statements following his admission that he was engaging in homosexual acts proved otherwise. On his current Facebook profile, he refers frequently to his masturbation habits. He also makes sexually explicit, inappropriate jokes, and he even makes light of other sexual perversions, like bestiality. It's worth pointing out that Fong had served as a teacher for some years, and to this day he writes books for children.

His private perversions have been manifested for the public to know, however, showing that he lacks judgment, and certainly does not carry the bearing or propriety to be around children.

Today, I wanted to look further, peering into the origins of his homosexual attractions. A few years ago, the tenth year anniversary of his "coming out" letter, Fong would write his 15-year-old self another letter, which was later published on the Singaporean pro-LGBT blog "Dear Straight People."


Dear 15-year-old self,

You’re the son of an Operation Coldstore veteran. Because of that you are growing up alone, travelling 3 hours daily, and returning to an empty home instead of going out with your best friends. Bet you don’t know that’s why “Luke, I am your father” struck such a deep chord with you, huh?

And there it is: the reason why Otto has homosexual issues.

He has father issues.

First, a little background about Operation Coldstore. This operation took place in the early 1960s, planned by Singapore's Founder Lee Kwan Yew, and with the help of British and Malaysian forces. In this stealth operation, LKY and fellow allies arrested 113 Communist sympathizers in order to prevent them from subverting the nascent country--which had only recently been expelled from the Malaysian Confederation. Anti-communist sentiment was high among Westerners and pro-Western elements in Southeast Asia, and they wanted to take every action possible to stop the spread of Communism.

Perhaps this military event meant that Otto's father lived in fear of his life. Perhaps because of his service in stopping bad political actors in Singapore, Otto's father constantly worried about the safety of his children. Whatever may have resulted, we know that Otto grew up without a loving father to be there for him, and without friends to help develop into a healthy male.

Dr. Thio Li-Ann, a former of member of Parliament and currently a law professor at the National University of Singapore talked about the absense of fathers as a cause for homosexual tendencies among adults. From her stunning, effective speech defending 377a (the statute which criminalizes homosexual acts in Singapore), Li-Ann stated:

Dr. Thio Li-Ann Defends 377a (2007)


Homosexuality is a gender identity disorder; there are numerous examples of former homosexuals successfully dealing with this. Just this year, two high profile US activists left the homosexual lifestyle, the publisher of Venus, a lesbian magazine, and an editor of Young Gay America. Their stories are available on the net. An article by an ex-gay in the New Statesmen this July identified the roots of his emotional hurts, like a distant father, overbearing mother and sexual abuse by a family friend; after working through his pain, his unwanted same-sex attractions left. While difficult, change is possible and a compassionate society would help those wanting to fulfill their heterosexual potential. There is hope.

Indeed, the absense of a loving, caring father hurts children all the time. At this time, we don't know if Otto's mother was overbearing and difficult, but anything is possible.

However, we can't get away from the father-son theme that stood out for him in that iconic scene from "The Empire Strikes Back."



Fong's letter to his 15-year-old self continues:

Yes, you also have a ‘shameful’ secret — you like guys, and feel like there’s something wrong with you. You hide it by being a good student and son, and plan to burn those childhood comic books and kung-fu novels you drew and wrote because you think some of it revealed your sexuality. First piece of advice: keep those books safe! They are awesome! And face it, you love that you love men.

The truth is that Otto's secret is shameful, only in that such behaviors are harmful, causing mental and psychological as well as physical damage. Sadly, there was no one he could turn to for help. This is a serious problem, since young people do need answers. "Why am I feeling this way?" is an understandable question. Most churches, most parents, and most school staffers don't have a ready answer for the reasons behind same-sex desirous feelings. I would further submit that perhaps Otto's first fascination with other males had nothing to do with sex, but an earnest, healthy need for male connection. That is not something to be ashamed of. However, if that need for father-son, and friend-friend bonding does not get taken care of, inevitably those individuals will long for sexual relationships with the same sex.

It’s tricky living with two of the most sensitive issues in Singapore, politics and sexuality. A third sensitive issue is religion. While you remain non-religious, some around you are. Learn to see that there are good people in religions. The bad ones will constantly try to lure you to the Dark Side using hate, like the Emperor in Return of the Jedi. The good ones will become some of your greatest allies.

Not only was there a distant father, but he has an even more distant relationship with The Father. His sexual preferences were distorted because there was no father around to show him the ropes of growing up. Then there is the fraught political matters in Singapore and throughout Southeast Asia. 

And on top of that, he has no heart for spiritual things. What a shame.

You read a lot of sci-fi novels because they take you away from this reality. You think you should study the Arts. Society will channel you into the Sciences. You may KPKB but remember: Leonardo Da Vinci was both an artist and a scientist. Eventually you’ll do both!

I have noticed this tendency toward fantasy and immaturity among many active homosexuals. Roy Tan, the so-called "LGBT Historian of Singapore", also immerses himself in science fiction and fantasy. All of these pursuits serve as mere comfort measures, distractions to get away from deeper pain.

You are good enough, and your family loves you. With time, things will turn out for the better — I don’t want to give you spoilers, but the ‘horrible’ things turn out incredible later.

What "horrible" things was Otto attempting to prepare his younger self for? Indeed!

Arm yourself with more knowledge, more science, and enjoy your youth!

Best,
Otto Fong,

Final Reflection

The need for love is so important, and this love must be more than sexual impulse or physical intimacy.

The father's love means a great deal, especially for boys. This love makes it possible for a male to identify with the male who brought him into this world, and who has the best opportunity to bring him up, as well. Otto didn't have that kind of love, and today he struggles with all kinds of sexual dysfunction and deviance as a result.

There is hope, however. While Otto writes about one Luke, aka Skywalker, there is another Luke he needs to look into, i.e. the Gospel of Luke. There, he would learn about the lavish, unrelenting love of The Father, Father God who gave His Son for us, who takes away all our shame, who gives us His Life, Himself, and restores us to a greater standing.

In The Parable of the Loving Father (Luke 15: 11-32), Jesus the true heart of His Heavenly Father, and thus for those who believe in Jesus .. OUR Heavenly Father (cf John 20:17):



The understanding of God the Father's love for us does not come naturally. It takes the Holy Spirit, by whom the love of God is shed abroad in our hearts (Romans 5:5). However, once we believe that Jesus has done a perfect work putting away all our sins and granting His Life, we can then grow in grace, and ask God to reveal to us how much He loves us!

It's worth noting that today, men and women in the Body of Christ as well as in other professional settings can help diagnose why individuals become attracted to the same sex. Knowing the reasons why helps dispel all shame and guilt, and then sets these individuals free. If there is any lust, any longing which is harmful and destructive, it all comes back to one simple reason:

"Love not the world, neither the things that are in the world. If any man love the world, the love of the Father is not in him." (1 John 2:15)


Tuesday, March 10, 2020

Unrelenting Irony: LGBT Activist Denies Sexual Deviancy, Inevitably Proves Otherwise

Openly Gay LGBT Activist Otto Fong

So here it is: I, Otto Fong, have always been and always will be a gay man. When you ask about my spouse, I will say he is a man. I am as proud being gay as you are proud being straight. I am not, as some people like to label gays, a pedophile, a child molester, a pervert or sexual deviant. I did not choose to be gay, just like heterosexuals did not choose to be straight. I am not going to hell (not for being gay anyway). -- The Online Citizen, Open Letter

Mr. Otto Fong wrote the following letter when he came out to the Singaporean public in 2007 about his sexual preferences.

His "coming out" was quite a controversial act in 2007, considering that that was the same year in which a petition was formally launched to repeal 377a, the statute in the Republic of Singapore which criminalizes immoral acts between men, including sodomy and other sexual perversions.

He decided to declare his homosexual preferences to the general public. He was summarily forced to resign his position his teacher. Since then, he has left the country and continued in his "marriage" with another man.

What is striking about the above statement is that he made himself out to be a benign individual with a benign eccentricity, nothing more. "I like men, while other men like women," he more or less insinuates.

He declares emphatically that he is not a pervert or a sexual deviant either. He declared his otherwise normal sexual leanings thirteen years ago to a conservative public which by and large supported maintaining 377a. The statute is not rigorously enforced, yet the legislation informs the domestic public as well as the international community that the Republic of Singapore does not endorse, does not support homosexuality, transgenderism, and other sexual paraphilias.

Now, Mr. Fong wanted to give the impression with his "coming out" statement that homosexuals and transgenders are otherwise normal people. There is nothing for the general public to fear or to raise alarm about. "We are not sick people," he implies. In fact, the homosexual lobby worked very hard to pressure medical and mental health institutions to cease recognizing homosexuality--and later on, transgenderism--as mental disorders. This successful lobbying effort took place in the United States in 1973 for starters. Since then, the LGBT movement as a whole has gone to great lengths to put foward the following narrative:

1. We were born "this way".
2. Our sexual preferences are neither deviant nor destructive.
3. We have nothing more to request other than equal rights with heterosexual couples.

On the matter of deviance, Mr. Fong has greatly undermined himself.

In the last three months alone on his Facebook page, one can find numerous examples of his deviant behavior. He not only reports on his disturbing conduct, but insists on celebrating his private perversities in public!

The following posts he has plastered on his social media with no sense of awareness, but plenty of abandon:




(This man is supposed to be a teacher, mind you, but more on that disturbing detail later).

Here, Fong uses profanity.

He talks about masturbation.

He thinks it's a joke to put on his Facebook page. Really?

But there's more:

 More jokes, more open discussions about masturbation. Yes, indeed. This is quite deviant behavior, to put it mildly. Do married couples reveal the most intimate aspects for their sex lives to the public? Many couples understandably struggle to share their needs, wants, and insecurities with one another as it is!

But to make crass, crude, sexually explicit jokes, especially in connection with a serious illness and a rapidly spreading virus? This is very disconcerting.

And how about this post? Mr. Fong is now advocating for threesomes. Really.

"There is no benefit for us to conform", Fong writes when it comes to proper and improper sexual relations.

In other words, "Let's embrace deviant behaviors."

These comments, these public statements from an activist homosexual like Otto Fong should come as no surprise.

Homosexuals do not, cannot remain in simple, straightforward (in every sense of the word) relationships. The inherent pains, hurts, and traumas which gave rise to the behaviors often drive these individuasl to engage in all kinds of deviant, dangerous, destructive acts which are harmful to themselves and to others. "Threesomes" are hardly a means by which any individual can properly conssumate a relationship, whether among heterosexual or homosexual couples.

Mr. Fong probably had no idea how far the road to sexual anarchy and despair would take him.

Consider also these posts, which he also publishe quite recently.

He makes crude jokes about bestiality:




This account from Fong's childhood is particularly revealing as well as disturbing:



Here, Fong reports that he experienced his first orgasm at 11 years old. That's quite young for a male. One has to wonder if he was sexual exploited or used in some fashion, that he would end up ejaculating so early in his youth--and in a pool, a public place. Didn't his parents have enough sense, enough regard for the well-being of their son?

The fact that he jokes about such an intimate matter, and one involving his childhood, is particularly revolting, and even degrading.

This man makes jokes about sexual awareness and expression from his childhood? This is more deviant behavior, certainly--sexual deviant behavior.

Then we find another post, in which Otto Fong gives a lengthy comment about his solitary habits of self-pleasure:



For the sake of decency, I will not report word for word what he wrote. It's worth pointing out that he not only goes into great deal about his own self-pleasure habits, but insists on documenting them and even praising them. This is a clear lack of judgment as well as immoral and dishonorable. Again, would healthy married couples go to such lengths to expose their marital intimacies with the public? Mr. Fong is a "married" man, as well--to another man, which in effect voids his stance as a properly married person.

He has a sexual partner, but he insists on not only engaging in masturbation, but sharing his auto-erotic activities with the world. He dishonors his own body, and he dishonors the body and well-being of his "partner". This is selfish, childish behavior, but behavior which also indicates a deeply entrenched addiction to this sexual perversion.

To recap, I have provided above  five posts from Mr. Fong's Facebook profile from just the last two months.

In light of these very revealing comments, consider  once gain his "coming out" statement from 2007 once again:

I am not, as some people like to label gays, a pedophile, a child molester, a pervert or sexual deviant.

On the contrary ...

Yes, Mr. Fong, You are a pervert.

Yes, Mr. Fong, you are a sexual deviant.

It gets worse, of course.

This very troubled man also writes books for children:

And he is a teacher.

Consider the thoughts running through his mind when he interacts with them:



His initial, very deviant response to the question above is provided below:

"I thought of a meme I saw recently. It said: “People with high sex drive look younger than their ages.”

I wonder if the parents of the students in his class will want their children around such a dissolute man after reading all of this. Indeed.

Mr. Fong, sadly, is very typical of many homosexuals, particulary the activists who are pushing their hardest to normalize their behaviors before the general public, to insist that everyone else recognize, accept, even celebrate their conduct.

There is a deep-rooted sense of immaturity among homosexuals. They act as though they have not really grown up. Their development is quite stunted, considering the level, the invasive nature of information they share about themselves. They insist on identifying themselves with their feelings, with catering to their desires, and demanding that everyone else embrace them and their sexual proclivities without refusal or limitation.

The fact is that the behavior and its attending patterns are inherently deviant, and there is nothing that homosexuals can do about it of itself. The notion of monogamous, stable homosexual relationships simple does no bear out. A number of have studies have confirmed that homosexuals ended up having multiple sexual partners, even if not engaging with more than one at a time.

Mr. Fong wanted to portray himself as a misunderstood victim in 2007, when he declared to the world that he was a gay man who needed to be true to himself. The truth is that he lied about himself, too, when he claimed that he was not a pervert or a sexual deviant. In fact, homosexual conduct cannot separate itself from such inevitable profligacy.

Scientists, political pundits, and even every day citizens around the world must recognize these harrowing realities about homosexual, transgenderism, and other paraphilias. These LGBT behaviors, and the ideology which defends and even promotes them, are deviant and perverse, and no denials can hide those facts. In fact, the homosexuals themselves cannot help but expose the deviant, dark, and destructive nature of their behaviors.