Showing posts with label Daily Caller. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Daily Caller. Show all posts

Monday, January 14, 2019

From the Daily Caller: Senior Trump Official Hopes For Long Shutdown

I’m A Senior Trump Official, And I Hope A Long Shutdown Smokes Out The Resistance

The Daily Caller is taking the rare step of publishing this anonymous op-ed at the request of the author, a senior official in the Trump administration whose identity is known to us and whose career would be jeopardized by its disclosure. We believe publishing this essay anonymously is the only way to deliver an important perspective to our readers. We invite you to submit a question about the essay or our vetting process here.
As one of the senior officials working without a paycheck, a few words of advice for the president’s next move at shuttered government agencies: lock the doors, sell the furniture, and cut them down.
Federal employees are starting to feel the strain of the shutdown. I am one of them. But for the sake of our nation, I hope it lasts a very long time, till the government is changed, and can never return to its previous form.
The lapse in appropriations is more than a battle over a wall. It is an opportunity to strip wasteful government agencies for good.

On an average day roughly 15 percent of the employees around me are exceptional patriots serving their country. I wish I could give competitive salaries to them, and no one else. But 80 percent feel no pressure to produce results. If they don’t feel like doing what they are told, they don’t.
Why would they? We can’t fire them. They avoid attention, plan their weekend, schedule vacation, their second job, their next position, some do this in the same position for more than a decade. (RELATED: EPA Employees Who Watched Porn, Harassed Women And Got Promoted)



They do nothing that warrants punishment and nothing of external value. That is their workday: errands for the sake of errands; administering, refining, following and collaborating on process. “Process is your friend” is what delusional civil servants tell themselves. Even senior officials must gain approval from every rank across their department, other agencies and work units for basic administrative chores.

Process is what we serve, process keeps us safe, process is our core value. It takes a lot of people to maintain the process. Process provides jobs. In fact, there are process experts and certified process managers who protect the process. Then there are the 5 percent with moxy (career managers). At any given time they can change, clarify or add to the process — even to distort or block policy counsel for the president.

Saboteurs peddling opinion as research, tasking their staff on pet projects or pitching wasteful grants to their friends. Most of my career colleagues actively work against the president’s agenda. This means I typically spend about 15 percent of my time on the president’s agenda and 85 percent of my time trying to stop sabotage, and we have no power to get rid of them. Until the shutdown.

Due to the lack of funding, many federal agencies are now operating more effectively from the top down on a fraction of their workforce, with only select essential personnel serving national security tasks. One might think this is how government should function, but bureaucracies operate from the bottom up, a collective of self-generated ideas. Ideas become initiatives, formalize into offices, they seek funds from Congress and become bureaus or sub-agencies, and maybe one day grow to be their own independent agency, like ours. The nature of a big administrative bureaucracy is to grow to serve itself. I watch it and fight it daily. (RELATED: Remember When Obama And Clinton Shut Down Government For Their Own Pet Projects?)
When the agency is full, employees held liable for poor performance respond with threats, lawsuits, complaints, and process in at least a dozen offices, taking years of mounting paperwork with no fear of accountability, extending their careers, while no real work is done. Do we succumb to such extortion? Yes. We pay them settlements, we waive bad reviews, and we promote them.

Many government agencies have adopted the position that more complaints are good because it shows inclusion in, you guessed it, the process. When complaints come, it is cheaper to pay them off than to hold public servants accountable. The result: People accused of serious offenses are not charged, and self-proclaimed victims are paid by you, the American taxpayer.
The message to federal supervisors is clear. Maintain the status quo, or face allegations. Many federal employees truly believe that doing tasks more efficiently and cutting out waste, by closing troubled programs instead of expanding them, “is morally wrong,” as one cried to me.



I get it. These are their pets. It is tough to put them down and let go, and many resist. This phenomenon was best summed up by a colleague who said, “The goal in government is to do nothing. If you try to get things done, that’s when you will run into trouble.”

But President Trump can end this abuse. Senior officials can reprioritize during an extended shutdown, focus on valuable results and weed out the saboteurs. We do not want most employees to return, because we are working better without them. Sure, we empathize with families making tough financial decisions, like mine, and just like private citizens who have to find other work and bring competitive value every day, while paying more than a third of their salary in federal taxes.

President Trump has created more jobs in the private sector than the furloughed federal workforce. Now that we are shut down, not only are we identifying and eliminating much of the sabotage and waste, but we are finally working on the president’s agenda.

President Trump does not need Congress to address the border emergency, and yes, it is an emergency. Billions upon billions of hard-earned tax dollars are still being dumped into foreign aid programs every year that do nothing for America’s interest or national security. The president does not need congressional funding to deconstruct abusive agencies who work against his agenda. This is a chance to effect real change, and his leverage grows stronger every day the shutdown lasts.

The president should add to his demands, including a vote on all of his political nominees in the Senate. Send the career appointees back. Many are in the 5 percent of saboteurs and resistance leaders. (RELATED: New Facts Indicate Mueller Destroyed Evidence, Obstructed Justice)

A word of caution: To be a victory, this shutdown must be different than those of the past and should achieve lasting disruption with two major changes, or it will hurt the president.

The first thing we need out of this is better security, particularly at the southern border. Our founders envisioned a free market night watchman state, not the bungled bloated bureaucracy our government has become. But we have to keep the uniformed officers paid, which is an emergency. Ideally continue a resolution to pay the essential employees only, if they are truly working on national security. Furloughed employees should find other work, never return and not be paid.

Secondly, we need savings for taxpayers. If this fight is merely rhetorical bickering with Nancy Pelosi, we all lose, especially the president. But if it proves that government is better when smaller, focusing only on essential functions that serve Americans, then President Trump will achieve something great that Reagan was only bold enough to dream.

The president’s instincts are right. Most Americans will not miss non-essential government functions. A referendum to end government plunder must happen. Wasteful government agencies are fighting for relevance but they will lose. Now is the time to deliver historic change by cutting them down forever.

The author is a senior official in the Trump administration.

The views and opinions expressed in this commentary are those of the author and do not reflect the official position of The Daily Caller.

Tuesday, May 9, 2017

The Red Elephants Expose Illegal Alien Luis "White People Have Only Five Years Left" Nolasco

Luis Nolasco has become a social media sensation--again!

"Go Away, White People! Die Already!"


First, the Daily Caller exposed his anti-white hatred in the January 9, 2017 Rialto City Council meeting.

Here are the comments from the Daily Caller:

ACLU Official Mocks Elderly White People, Tells Them They Have ‘Five Years Left’

“It’s kind of mean for me to say it but these people have probably like five years left,” Nolasco said while gesturing to the white attendees at the meeting. A video of the meeting shows that several of them were elderly.

The ACLU official said that Latinos and blacks are “the future,” and that “we don’t want to see an America that is hateful.”

The ACLU of Southern California told The Daily Caller Tuesday that Nolasco’s comments were not consistent with the ACLU’s stated policy but they support his right to freely express his opinion.

“Everyone in America has a Constitutional right to free speech, and the employees of the ACLU of Southern California are no exception. However, we wish to make clear that Luis Nolasco was not speaking on behalf of the ACLU at the Rialto City Council meeting and his statements are not consistent with our stated policy. Nevertheless, we support his right to freely express his personal opinion to his elected representatives,” the civil liberties group said.

The ACLU actually had to play defense.

But the fight is not over. Nolasco, an illegal alien, is still representing the ACLU.



Then in the last week, the Red Elephants picked up the story and shared Nolasco's belief that white people had only five years left:

An illegal alien, Luis Nolasco, spoke to the city of Rialto, CA during a city council meeting this week.  He told the panel and the crowd that the white race only has about 5 years left.  This is more proof of the blatant attack on the white race and it is accepted in current society because of the indoctrination and forced white guilt within our school systems today.  I’m sorry but I do not apologize for being a part of western society, which created the modern world, including everything we use today.

It's time to hold left-wing agitators, especially these arrogant, brazen illegal aliens, accountable for their hateful rhetoric. What would happen to white residents of Rialto looking at black or Hispanic residents and telling them "You only have five years left"?

There would be pandemonium in the press. There would be protests and riots in the streets. The outrage industry would ruoll out in full force.

It's time toake people to task for this rhetoric.

And asfor Nolasco - he should he be deported -- immediately!

Thursday, January 19, 2017

ACLU Forced to Reject Comments from Race-Baiting Rialto Activist Luis Nolasco Exposed by National Media

Just an FYI for anyone who has not been informed about what has happened since We the People Rising stopped sanctuary status in Rialto.

One of the speakers at the January 10th, 2017 city council meeting was an ACLU activist named Luis Nolasco.

He uttered some very misinformed and disrespectul comments about the visitors to the city as well as the "white minority" Rialto residents.

Here's the video I took of his comments:


Then friends of mine showed me that The Daily Caller had picked up this video!


The reporter added some intriguing details and comments from the ACLU about Nolasco's comments:

An official for the American Civil Liberties Union of Southern California mocked elderly white people at a city council meeting last week, telling them they had “five years left.”

Rialto, California, held a regularly scheduled city council meeting last Tuesday after a city councilman apologized for planning an event to discuss the possibility of Rialto becoming a “sanctuary city.”

Luis Nolasco, a community engagement and policy advocate for the ACLU of Southern California, stood up to speak at the city council meeting and attacked many of the white people present, saying they are not actual residents of Rialto.

This report was really gratifying. It's good to know that these race-baiting Millennials are not getting away with their arrogant and snide remarks.



The ACLU had to disavow Nolasco's remarks:

The ACLU of Southern California told The Daily Caller Tuesday that Nolasco’s comments were not consistent with the ACLU’s stated policy but they support his right to freely express his opinion.


This is how Californians, American citizens start punching back twice as hard.

These aggressive, progressive pro-amnesty activists need to be put to shame. Their attacks on people just because of the color of their skin is beyond intolerable.

David Phillips of Rialto now not only criticized Nolasco, but pointed out the racist double-standard:



""I want to apologize for the young man who is sorry that there are white people here."

Indeed/

Racism means no special privileges for anyone.

And guess what?

The Washington Times also picked up this story!

Check out the link below:


This article focused on the age of the residents whom Nolasco was mocking!

Shows you the true heart of the ACLU, doesn't it!