"Independent of the control or interference of the federal government."
That’s how Tench Coxe described the vast majority of power under the Constitution - reserved to the states and completely off-limits to federal authority.
Perhaps better than any other supporter of the Constitution, Coxe explained federalism – the division of powers between the state and federal governments.
Today, as we live under the largest government in world history, understanding his insights into this foundational structure of the constitution is more important than ever.
The Foundation
Thomas Jefferson described the system of federalism - as expressed in the 10th Amendment - as the foundation of the entire Constitution:
“I consider the foundation of the Constitution as laid on this ground: That ‘all powers not delegated to the United States, by the Constitution, nor prohibited by it to the States, are reserved to the States or to the people.’”
Jefferson's opinion on the constitutionality of the national bank - Feb. 15, 1791 - was ten months to the day before the 10th Amendment was ratified.
But the principle behind it wasn't something he came up with on his own. It was a cornerstone of the ratification debates in 1787-88.
James Madison captured this structure succinctly in Federalist No. 45:
“The powers delegated by the proposed Constitution to the federal government are few and defined. Those which are to remain in the State governments are numerous and indefinite.”
Other prominent figures echoed this sentiment:
James Wilson: “Every thing which is not given, is reserved.”
Edmund Randolph: “Every power not given it by this system is left with the states.”
Alexander Hamilton: “Whatever is not expressly given to the federal head, is reserved to the members.”
Here, we see a clear and unified alignment among some of the most influential supporters of ratification - the "father of the Constitution," one of the first Supreme Court justices, and Hamilton, George Washington’s right-hand man - all affirming the same foundational principle of delegated and reserved powers.
Anti-Federalist Calls for Explicit Limits on Federal Power
The Anti-Federalists also supported this principle - but they insisted it be explicitly spelled out in the Constitution itself. For example, John Williams of New York argued that “The general government ought to be confined to certain national objects; and the States should retain such powers, as concern their own internal police."
Similarly, George Mason said he wished for "a clause in the Constitution with respect to all powers which are not granted, that they are retained by the States. Otherwise the power of providing for the general welfare may be perverted to its destruction."
The Anti-Federalists won this battle, resulting in the inclusion of the 10th Amendment in the Bill of Rights to explicitly enshrine the system of delegated and reserved powers that Federalists had described during the ratification debates.
“The powers not delegated to the United States by the Constitution, nor prohibited by it to the States, are reserved to the States respectively, or to the people.”
No comments:
Post a Comment