Media Freefall Over Moore Smears

The liberal mainstream media could not stop themselves, could they?

All they needed was a hostile, salacious article about the abusive, nasty past of a prospective candidate, and that solved everything for them as they pushed their agenda.

So, the Washington Post throws up a very incriminating, disturbing article a few days ago--front page news, too!--that Judge Roy Moore dated "teenagers" and engaged in an inappropriate relationship with a 14-year old.

For the record, any sexual encounter with a minor is evil, wrong, immoral, unacceptable, and must be denounced and condemned.

Done.

Now, is there any truth at all to the allegations against Judge Roy?

Joel Pollak of Breitbart News submitted the following points during his interview with MSNBC:

This video is a slanted version, making it seem as though the editor is somehow defending sexual abuse with a minor.

This video shows more lies, and then the lies continue with the MSNBC.

The article listed four people claiming sexual issues with Moore.

But the headline at the outright challenges the truth of the contents within. The headline and main portions of the passage talk about "teenagers." Huh?

Three of the focused cases are individuals in their legal age. There is only case that would be legally troublesome for Moore.

Now, there is more information to suggest that this "one person" is just another political plant dishing up an unfounded hit piece against Moore:

There’s a claim spreading on social media that a reporter was taped while reportedly offering a woman $1000 to accuse Senate candidate Roy Moore of sexual improprieties.

The unconfirmed rumor, which seems to have originated from a former Secret Service agent, claims the woman taped the conversation she had with the reporter and sent copies to the Etowah Co. District Attorney and the FBI.

What else is coming up?

One of the other accusers worked for ... Hillary Clinton, specifically on her Presidential campaign:

One of the women who said Senate candidate Roy Moore pursued her while she was in high school worked for Hillary Clinton's campaign as a sign language interpreter, according to videos and documents posted online.

Well, well, well. Another political smear is beginning to unravel.

Let's see where else we can go with this ...

The Latest on Roy Moore, the GOP nominee for the Senate in Alabama (all times local):

9:05 p.m.

The lawyer for one of the women cited in The Washington Post's story about sexual misconduct by Senate candidate Roy Moore says it is "reprehensible that so many Alabama Republican officeholders" have rejected the evidence.

What evidence? That's the whole point? Where is the blue dress, so to speak?!

Check out the corrupt desperation of this Alabama newspaper:

There are unfortunate spelling errors, and then there's this. pic.twitter.com/hOct23xDBQ

— Ben Jones (@BW_Jones) November 11, 2017

It's as though this editor was desperate to put out something against Judge Roy Moore, so they rushed the headline into print without fact-checking or spell-checking.

Funny stuff!

There's more interesting news about all of this.

Reporters went into Alabama cities asking for any information about voter reaction to these intense allegations. The anti-Moore Intercept reluctantly reported:

Republican strategists in Alabama have for years heard rumors that Roy Moore had “women issues” —  but they were never able to get definitive proof.

Opposition researchers from Washington and from Strange’s campaign traveled to Moore’s hometown of Gadsden, Alabama, earlier this year, but were unable to confirm the rumors, the sources said.

After all these years, these opposition researchers found ... nothing.

Then suddenly ... SUDDENLY ... some lady comes forward about sexual abuse from over 30 years ago about an illicit relationship with a minor. Really?

Not buying it.

This video outlines the concerns with Corfman's story:

Why has the Left gone after Moore, but they say nothing about Harvey Weinstein and the rest of the Democratic Party for standing by their own predators, perverts, and pedophiles?

Exactly.

Check out this video, too, from ABC News based in Alabama:



The fact is that even the voters in the above video outline their disbelief. They don't trust the Washington Post article. Besides, the liberal mainstream media has lost so much credibility over the last year, with the countless, baseless attacks against President Trump and Republicans across the board.

More to the point, Democartic US Senator Robert Menendez is under indictment and on trial for massive public corruption, and the media refuse to report on it.

The double standard, the shady timing of these reports, the lack of substantive evidence, the questionable political leanings of the women making the charges--all of it casts further doubt on this trashy report.

There's more from the liberal press affirming that the voters of Alabama refuse to be taken for a ride with their lies:

Moore finds his defenders back home while the climate is less hospitable in Washington, where GOP senators, as well as the White House, have called on the conservative firebrand to drop out of the race if the report is true.

Of more than 15 Republican voters in Alabama interviewed by NBC News, none said their support for Moore would change.

Most said they didn't believe the allegations and some said even if they are true, that wouldn't sway their vote for him next month because they think Moore is a good man, should be forgiven and they could never bring themselves to vote for a Democrat anyway. Several attacked the media.

This is a complete media freefall, folks. Let's just hope that Moore rides through this hateful smearfest.

If Moore wins he will deliver a crushing blow to the media left’s familiar strategy of last-minute racial & sexual allegations

— Dinesh D'Souza (@DineshDSouza) November 11, 2017