Friday, March 20, 2026

Texas Scorecard: Socialist Suicide Begets Radical Islam

 

by Michael Quinn Sullivan

Podcast
 

An insane number of young Americans seem to think socialism works. The global reality tells a very different story, but not necessarily the one you think.

We expect that socialism destroys economies. And it does, everywhere. But that’s not all that it destroys.

In the United States, Mississippi is the brunt of most every economic joke. It is the nation's poorest state. And yet, Mississippi’s per capita GDP is higher than that of Europe’s five largest economies, except Germany. Even between the two, Germany and Mississippi are in a dead heat.

People romanticize living in socialist Europe like children wanting their home to be a candy store. The cry of “Free candy!” from children who have never had to work to pay for it is little different from adults demanding that they be provided “free health care.”

In reality, it isn’t free. Worse, it is deadly. Again, not entirely the way you think.

But let’s start with that. Consider the miraculous wonders of magnetic resonance imaging, or MRI. In those counties with “free” health care, the people will wait four to eight weeks for a routine MRI, and a week for “urgent” needs. In the UK, the wait times exceed two years.

In comparison, the wait time in the United States averages two weeks for a routine scan and hours in an emergency. Even the humble X-Ray requires a three-week wait in much of Europe.

“Free health care” is meaningless if it is unavailable when you need it.

Canada has come up with a solution to keep costs contained: the expansive use of euthanasia. In Canada, “free health care” means a death sentence if government bean counters determine your life isn’t convenient.

That’s bad enough, but it is an altogether different kind of suicide that socialism is inspiring. 

To fund their socialist societies, the European countries have committed slow-motion cultural suicide. Remember, the once-mighty Germany can barely muster the economic strength of Mississippi. The United Kingdom, upon which the sun reportedly never set, is now in its twilight years economically and culturally.

While one can point to an extraordinary example of a singular product or company, socialist countries must, by definition, strangle the creative and entrepreneurial mindset necessary for a vibrant culture and economy. Socialist governments are hungry leviathans that must be fed at an exponential rate. Small business owners, wealthy investors, large corporations, the elderly, the infirm … All must be devoured.

The advocates of socialism understand this, even if their acolytes do not. Socialism must eliminate the economic structures, societies, and cultures upon which it seeks to impose itself. There can be no competition for service or affection. There can be no higher power than government.

The promise of free everything, coupled with a misplaced sense of cultural guilt driven by leftist ideology, has seen modern Europe overrun by the dregs of Islamic culture. No, “overrun” is not fair; that implies innocence on the part of the Europeans. No, Europe imported the very worst of the Middle East to prop up its flailing economic infrastructure against the crushing weight of socialism.

One need only consider the no-go zones of Paris or the euphemistically styled “grooming gang” scandal in England to understand how little that carefully guided European vacation showed. Indeed, what visitors glimpse of modern European culture is actually a continent-sized museum of 18th-century life.

So then why do 62 percent of American adults under 30 say they hold a “favorable view” of socialism? Or, even more worrisome, that 34 percent of the same group have a similar view of communism?

Together, those worldviews drove more than 110 million state-sponsored murders in the 20th century, and continue producing misery and despair today. Yet they are being spoon-fed as fairy tales to American children every day.

It was one thing when tenured professors in post-graduate courses waxed poetic about the glory days of Comrade Stalin. But the rapid influx of left-wing ideologues indoctrinating our elementary and secondary schools presents a greater threat to our economy and constitutional liberties.

As socialism devours cultures, Islamification steps in to reanimate the corpse in the Sharia-proscribed horror demanded by its false god.

Like Europe, which first fell sway to leftist ideas before welcoming Islamic radicals, one need only see Minneapolis—which allows the public broadcast of the Muslim call to prayer five times per day—for a glimpse of the destination to which we are mindlessly running. Where Europe has gone, the United States is sadly following. 

We are not there yet. There is time to act. Alarms are ringing. Will we snooze, or will we take action to save our republic?

Thursday, March 19, 2026

VDH: The Counterrevolution is Here

Wednesday, March 18, 2026

DO NOT TALK: END of the CABAL

Friday, March 13, 2026

Sheriff Chad Bianco: Standing Up to Gavin Newsom

 Arthur,

Do you remember Christmas 2020?

Gavin Newsom decided to take away your God-given right to gather, open your business, and even attend church. He locked you inside your home.

And he demanded that local law enforcement act as his political muscle to enforce his unconstitutional mandates.

Hell no.

As Sheriff of Riverside County, I swore an oath to protect the rights of Riverside’s 2.5 million residents. So I refused to obey Newsom’s illegal orders. This is the video I recorded at the time announcing my position:

Sheriff Chad Bianco video message

Per my orders, my deputies didn’t arrest people for living their lives.

I took a major risk and a lot of heat for refusing to obey and daring Newsom to stop me. If I could do it again…I wouldn’t change a thing.

Real leadership means doing what’s best for the people — especially when the powers that be want you to do the opposite. I will protect your rights, no matter the cost to me. My stand against the lockdowns is proof:

WATCH NOW

Fighting for you,
Sheriff Chad Bianco
Republican for Governor


Wednesday, March 11, 2026

¡Viva La Libertad, Carajo! President Milei Establishes Argentina's First ICE Force

Monday, March 9, 2026

Jean Adelsman Under Investigation by the FPPC

In a previous post, I shared that Patsy Okada of North Torrance filed a complaint against "Take Back Torrance" liberal Jean Adelsman's Committee to Recall Aurelio Mattucci for campaign violations.

Last month, she received an update from the Fair Political Practices Commission:

On Feb 9, 2026, at 2:36 PM, Jonathan Rivera <JRivera@fppc.ca.gov> wrote:

Hello Patsy Okada,

 

My name is Jonathan Rivera and I am the attorney assigned to your complaint/case. The case is currently under investigation/review and at this time there is no update. If you have any additional questions, please let me know.

 

Sincerely,

 

image001.pngJonathan Rivera

Commission Counsel

Fair Political Practices Commission

1102 Q Street, Suite 3050, Sacramento, CA 95811

jrivera@fppc.ca.gov • (279) 237-5913

Is Jean in trouble?





US Supreme Court Blocks California’s Secret Transition Policies, Restores Parents’ Rights

 

Supreme Court Reverses Ninth Circuit Stay in Mirabelli v. Bonta, Reinforces Parental Authority, and Delivers Generational Win for Families

The California Family Council (CFC) proudly celebrates today’s momentous U.S. Supreme Court ruling reversing the Ninth Circuit’s stay on Mirabelli v. Bonta, a case challenging California’s secret gender transition policies in public schools. In a landmark 6–3 decision, the High Court restored the statewide injunction and made clear that California’s practice of concealing a child’s gender transition from parents likely violates both the Free Exercise Clause of the First Amendment and the Due Process Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment.

The Court emphatically held that California “cut out the primary protectors of children’s best interests: their parents” and reaffirmed that parents, not government bureaucrats or unelected officials, hold constitutional authority over decisions concerning their children’s upbringing and education. This is a watershed ruling for parental rights nationwide and sends a powerful message to school districts across the state.

A Hard-Won Vindication of CFC’s Fight for Parent Notification

For years, the California Family Council and allied parental rights organizations have worked relentlessly to advance parental notification policies, efforts rooted in the foundational belief that parents must be informed and involved in all significant decisions affecting their children’s lives. These efforts included supporting local school districts adopting Parent Notification policies that require schools to notify parents when their child expresses a desire to live or identify as a gender different from their biological sex, despite opposition from Sacramento leadership.

CFC’s advocacy followed years of state resistance to that common-sense transparency. California legislators blocked a parent notification policy bill at the Capitol, and state leaders even enacted laws to prohibit such local policies, creating a “government-imposed wall of secrecy” between parents and their children.

Now, the Supreme Court’s decision fundamentally vindicates that fight. By reaffirming parents’ constitutional rights and rejecting lower court efforts to limit the parental victory, the Court has vindicated CFC’s consistent message: parents have the fundamental right to know and participate in decisions about their child’s mental, emotional, and physical well-being.

Why the Ninth Circuit Was Wrong, According to the Supreme Court

The Supreme Court found that the Ninth Circuit incorrectly stayed an injunction protecting constitutional parental rights. In its decision, the Court held that:

  • Parents very likely have standing to challenge secret gender transition policies, and
  • Class certification was likely proper, ensuring broad protections for all parents and teachers affected statewide.

The justices made clear that such secretive policies are not just administrative decisions; they are constitutional harms to parental liberty that cannot be brushed aside by lower courts.

Impact on Every California School

The Court’s ruling means that no school district in California may:

  • Conceal a child’s gender transition from their parents;
  • Facilitate social transitions, by changing a child’s name and pronoun, at school without parental knowledge and consent; or
  • Compel teachers to mislead students’ families.

This restores parents’ rightful role and authority in fundamental aspects of their children’s lives and sharpens constitutional boundaries for public education.

Thanking the Attorneys and Courageous Teachers

CFC extends profound gratitude to the Thomas More Society legal team — including Paul M. Jonna, Peter Breen, Jeff Trissell, Michael McHale, and Christopher Galiardo,  whose steadfast advocacy has delivered a generational victory for parental rights. We also honor the teachers, Elizabeth Mirabelli and Lori West, whose courage to stand with parents when few would listen helped fuel this pivotal case. Their bravery has affirmed that educators often know best, and that they, too, are protected when they refuse to be instruments of deception. (See the Thomas More Society press release here.)

Statement from Greg Burt, Vice President, California Family Council

“Today’s Supreme Court decision is a monumental victory for parents, teachers, and the Constitution. The Ninth Circuit was wrong to block protections for families while this case moves forward. The Supreme Court rightly recognized that parents have a fundamental right to know what is happening to their children at school and to direct their upbringing without government interference.

California’s policy of hiding a child’s gender transition from mom and dad was not only unconstitutional, but it was also dangerous. No school should ever place ideology above a child’s well-being or a parent’s God-given authority.

This decision sends a powerful message: the Constitution still protects families, and California schools are not above the law.”

A New Era for Parental Rights

This decision marks a turning point in the battle over parental authority in education, reinforcing constitutional protections and setting precedent for parents nationwide. As CFC has long maintained, the government’s role should never be to usurp parental authority, but to protect it.

While today’s ruling restores the statewide injunction, the case itself now returns to the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals for a full decision on the merits. The Supreme Court did not issue a final ruling on the ultimate constitutionality of California’s policies, but it made clear that the lower court was wrong to block the district court’s protections while the appeal is pending. In other words, the Ninth Circuit may still hear and decide the case, but it cannot strip parents of constitutional protections in the meantime. Until the appellate court issues its final decision, the district court’s injunction remains in effect across California.

Tenth Amendment Center: The Feds Are Not the Boss of the States