I love this sht! 🤣🤣🤣
— Gunther Eagleman™ (@GuntherEagleman) December 13, 2025
Merry Christmas!
pic.twitter.com/U0HT9yhqSM
Sunday, December 14, 2025
Merry Trump-Mas with Nicki Minaj
Japan Enforcing Immigration Laws
🚨🇯🇵 JAPAN DEPORTATIONS UNDERWAY
— Basil the Great (@BasilTheGreat) December 12, 2025
They are not messing around 💥
Child of Migrants - "I was born and raised in Japan"
Japan - "You're Indian, time to go home"
Japan is keeping its country for its own people
Is it time we did the same? pic.twitter.com/uXGBiWKlXV
Thursday, December 11, 2025
Pro-Trump Fed Governors Predicted Tariffs Would Not Hurt American Economy
 by |
| December 11, 2025 |
How Two Fed Governors Saw Through the Tariff-Inflation PanicBack in April, when tariff panic gripped Washington and Wall Street, Federal Reserve Governor Christopher Waller stood nearly alone. While economists warned of a 1970s-style inflation spiral, Waller calmly argued that the new tariffs would create a one-time jump in prices, not a new inflation regime. By September, newly confirmed Fed Governor Stephen Miran joined the cause with sophisticated quantitative analysis showing monetary policy was roughly 200 basis points too restrictive. Nine months after Waller’s initial call, the latest Summary of Economic Projections (SEP) tells us something simple: The Federal Reserve has become Wallerite—and perhaps even Miranian. The inflation hawks have stood down. And the data suggest Waller and Miran were right all along.  Fed Governor Christopher Waller is seen at the Federal Reserve Board open meeting in Washington, DC, on Oct. 24, 2025. (Al Drago/Bloomberg via Getty Images) The evolution is visible in Chair Jerome Powell’s own words. At the May 7 press conference, with tariff panic at its peak, Powell hedged heavily: “If the large increases in tariffs that have been announced are sustained, they are likely to generate a rise in inflation.” He used variations of “we don’t know” eighteen times. But by June 18, Powell’s language became structured: “A reasonable base case is that the effects on inflation will be relatively short-lived—a one-time shift in the price level.” He laid out clear conditions for persistent inflation: tight labor markets, unanchored expectations, and broad demand pressures. In other words, Powell was now speaking Waller’s language. As summer data rolled in, that framework proved prophetic. Miran’s Quantitative CaseWhen Miran joined the Board, he brought rigorous analysis supporting Waller’s concepts. In his September 22 speech, Miran showed how immigration policy changes would lower both inflation (reduced rental demand) and the neutral interest rate—the level of interest consistent with stable inflation. He calculated how tariff revenue would increase national saving, further reducing the neutral rate. He explained why deregulation would expand potential output faster than actual output, creating disinflationary pressure. Most importantly, Miran explained the mechanics: Trade policy generates relative price changes, not aggregate demand shocks. Without tight labor markets or unanchored expectations—neither of which materialized—one-time price increases wouldn’t become persistent inflation. The Fed establishment wasn’t buying it. Miran dissented in September, arguing for 50 basis points instead of 25. Three months later, the Committee’s projections would vindicate his analysis. The Pass-Through That Never Came to PassBetween June and the December SEP, the Fed watched for signs tariff inflation was becoming embedded. They didn’t materialize. Labor markets cooled gradually without overheating or crashing. Inflation expectations remained anchored. Wage pressures moderated. Services inflation continued “grinding down” toward 2 percent. The tariff pass-through that “every forecaster” expected to add “two or three more tenths, or four more tenths”? By December, Powell was talking about “a couple tenths or even less than that”—barely a rounding error in the broader story of disinflation. Rental inflation played out exactly as Miran predicted. With immigration policy sharply reducing housing demand, new tenant rent inflation fell to around one percent—far below elevated official statistics. The December Summary of Economic Projections tells the story in numbers. Look at Figure 3.C showing the distribution of inflation projections. In September, participants spread widely on 2026 forecasts, with a meaningful tail at 2.6 to 2.8 percent. That’s well above target, suggesting persistent tariff effects.
By December, that upper tail vanished. The distribution tightened dramatically around 2.4 percent. The median projection for 2026 fell from 2.6 percent to 2.4 percent—a 20-basis-point drop that came almost entirely from former hawks revising down their views. The participants most worried about tariff inflation moved the most. The Committee converged on the framework that Waller articulated in April and that Miran quantified in September. The Intellectual JourneyWhen unprecedented trade policy shifts created genuine confusion, the Fed established a theoretical framework (Waller), added quantitative rigor (Miran), watched the data (Powell), and adjusted forecasts as evidence accumulated. The core insight, now validated: Tariffs are relative price changes, not aggregate demand shocks. Without tight labor markets, unanchored expectations, or excessive demand, one-time price shifts don’t become ongoing inflation. The Fed’s models, built on anti-tariff prejudice and assumptions without supporting evidence, overstated pass-through. They underweighted modern dynamics, especially competitive pressures forcing cost absorption. Miran’s September dissent looked radical at the time, arguing for aggressive cuts when conventional wisdom said wait. But his analysis showed policy was 200 basis points too tight when properly accounting for neutral rate changes. Three months later, the Committee moved materially in his direction. By December, Powell could state matter-of-factly: “If you get away from tariffs, inflation is in the low 2s.” The one-time price shift theory held up. Tariffs could move prices once without changing the underlying inflation trend. Markets now price in a Fed seeing limited inflation pressure ahead. The December SEP projects 2.4 percent inflation next year, and 2.2 percent in 2027. Policy can continue normalizing. The soft landing remains intact. Chris Waller and Stephen Miran got the economics right when it mattered, when they had the courage to articulate an unpopular view at peak tariff panic. In April, Waller was the optimist. In September, Miran added quantitative firepower. By December, the Fed was full of Wallerites. The data made them that way. |
Indiana Republican Majority Leader Calls Out RINOs
Indiana Senate Majority Leader Chris Garten just gave a fiery speech in favor of the 9-0 map:
— Greg Price (@greg_price11) December 11, 2025
"Some will say these maps are political. Let me be clear: You're DAMN RIGHT they are... Safe streets are political. Affordable electricity is political. A drug free Indiana is… pic.twitter.com/IiKUWX6oBk
Monday, December 8, 2025
Friday, December 5, 2025
Letter to the Editor: Weekly Outing to a Movie
From What Happened to the Movie Industry?
Hi Arthur Schaper:My wife and I are at the age of our weekly outing is to go to a movie ( if we can find one ) history, true stories, biographies, then dinner out.Each week I look for new movies playing at our large many theater shopping mall. A good movie is now very hard to find. Too much violence,sex and cartoon movies.If…. we can find a good movie from watching a trailer of current movies on our computer, we consider ourselves lucky and go to the new showing.Once arriving, we enter an empty theater with usually no one else attending. Or, once it’s started, a very few people come in to watch.Speaking of Robert De Niro, I used to like watching him but now, I wouldn't walk across the street to greet him. He is so disgusting.Phil Dollison
Thursday, December 4, 2025
Coleman Hughes Exposes the Whole Groyper Fraud
I have waited a long time for someone to articulate this.
It bothered me that there was so much dishonesty within and pouring out of the Groyper movement.
I told one flabby groyper in Northern Idaho that the whole Nick Fuentes thing is a fraud, but I was rebuffed, and then he tried to attack me.
I was really bothered by the fact that many older, grounded conservatives (who claimed to be America First), were all about promoting this Fuentes guy.
Coleman Hughes has done a great service exposing and exploding the whole fraud:
Nick Fuentes knows exactly what he’s doing. pic.twitter.com/WR4NYUXChe
— Conversations with Coleman (@ConvoswColeman) December 4, 2025
Nick Fuentes Dating a Cat Boy
Why isn't this getting the attention that it should?
I have seen the videos, too, and it's disgusting!
House Minority Leader Jeffries Gives Trump Credit on Border Security
In an interview with CNN, House Democrat Leader Hakeem Jeffries admitted President Trump's border security policies are working.
When asked by CNN if Jeffries would give credit to President Trump for securing the border — after millions of unvetted illegals poured into the country under Biden — Jeffries responded by admitting "the border is secure," giving President Trump the credit.
President Trump promised he would secure the border and he did in his first year. Even the number one House Democrat can't deny it.
Sonali Patel
RNC Deputy Rapid Response Director
spatel@gop.com
Monday, December 1, 2025
Letter to the Editor: Tucker is a Lost Soul
Re: Tucker Carlson: Subtle Islamic Apologist
I am an 81 yo NYC Jew and trumpist. Tucker was the darling of the Right until he wasn't.
I have said, simply, that he fell in the shower and hit his head and had a personality change, and that,..
...while we should not take him seriously as to content, since he does not say what has not been said before,
we should, perversely, THANK him for outing his new allies, whom we might not have attended to, in our own, um solipsism and echo chamber and comfort zone
more specifically, he brought forward Fuentes, groypers, and the groyper / Turning Point connection - remember Sun Tzu - know your enemy ( which now includes Tucker) - and if the Qatari hand as puppet master is now visible, well, more power to us
=
but after a while the head- injury tipping-point lost its analytic (subjective ) power, and two new motivations emerged
=
one is that as turn-coat, old friends now enemies, and old enemies now friends, he is in the public eye, a dopamine hit, banal but powerful
and then there is the JEW connection, my group
As I recall, Tucker was all-in on POTUS theft 2020, as am I, and as are many
BUT TUCKER pointed to rigged voting machines and named their manufacturer, who of course, sued for damages, and won; I suppose / invite, in some law school, we could dissect that case, maybe find a problem with the reasoning, -- after the fact,
and Fox paid big and Tucker got fired
so, maybe, Tucker blames his old friends. for whom he 'carried water' as their public orator/ advocate, including the Jews, as I say, my group,
and now blames everyone for his fall from grace, or need for new patrons, ( and if Qatar sensed a marketing opportunity. If so, more power to them, and who is their marketing consultant, bigly)
and, continuing in my own Jew paranoia, once we blame the Jews for A, every other conspiracy falls into place, thus the Horse-shoe theory of Jew hatred ..
works for me
=
I will not here re-fight the Islam West / assimilation wars, but offer that Churchill has more islam creds than you have mentioned,
=
his first war was in a-stan (book churchill's first war)
https://www.amazon.com/Churchills-First-War-Winston-Afghans/dp/1250043042
presaging many issues one hundred years later,
and Churchill was also a war correspondent at Omdurman, with Kitchener avenging Gordon at Khartoum
https://ancientwarhistory.com/the-fall-of-omdurman-kitcheners-conquest-and-the-end-of-the-mahdist-state/
which does not mention his name, but he wrote for the press, his mom, Brooklyn girl Jenny Jerome was his press agent, and some scandalize even more....
and as public author he may well have found a niche, snarking his enemies, which somewhat denigrates his integrity, oops
=
Churchill was also First Lord of the Admiralty ( check this) in the disaster of Gallipoli, perhaps under -estimating The Turk, where Mustapha Kamal, Ataturk ( father of Turkey) beat Churchill in Churchill's own game, the Navy: defense: mine craft -- beating offense, and Churchill is then fired and in the wilderness until the Fall of France, when he is brought back and then post-war immediately turned out again,
Churchill is also prominent in the ottoman carve up, where we might be able to find Islam's casus bellus these days..
which is off topic to Tucker but part of the info domain of Churchill haters
=
there is a theme, that the US had no conflict with Germany ( Japan attacked us, in contrast) and that Churchill sucked us into the European war,
tucker's theme now, Israel is dragging US into the next world war, against Islam, and of course, that the US was sucked into anti-Nazi, over the Jews.... ( we jews argue quite the opposite, the US was benign towards the naz until Japan sucked us in, and of course US did sub rosa help the Brits, pre-Pearl)
=
and so his warm fuzzies re islam, if not mere brain concussion, HAS a theme, if we force the facts into a conclusion
ergo -
Tucker is saving us from WW3 and getting high while doing it...
=
MY vote, is that his getting fired at Fox, is his dominant grievance, where he can blame everyone and the Jews are always blamed
and that, deep down, he is a lost soul, contrarian until that gets old,
to repeat and conclude, he HAS outed folks that we are better of for their HAVING been outed
over to you
------------------------------------------------------------
Martin (I am going with the one name I can decipher from the email address):
Thank you for your extensive and thoughtful response.
You clearly know your history, far more than Tucker Carlson, for sure.
I may take some time to explore Churchill's bold leadership and great service to humanity in pursuing the war against Adolf Hitler, rather than following the Chamberlain routine of appeasement for "peace in our time," which clearly did not last long.
You mention "grievance" a few times, and that word sums up much of the anti-Semitism in the world.
Thank you again for writing, and you can read another one of my pieces refuting Tucker Carlson here:
By the way, have any of the anti-Zionist nuts harassed you about "The USS Liberty incident" yet?
Read more about it here:
Letter to the Editor: "Excellent Article"
Re: Why Conservatives Are (Seemingly) Losing the Israel/Anti-Semitism Fight
Excellent article. What you touch on but don't really develop (probably due to space and attention span limitations) is utter Biblical ignorance with which the "Christian," especially in America, is beset. Replacement Theology, a doctrine straight from the satanic realm, is rife among the "seeker sensitive" woke churches of America. As the preeminent Chuck Missler so aptly stated, adherence to that belief is to call Almighty God a liar. Israel is YHVH's timepiece, and it is shouting that the end of things is fast approaching. The Gospel is the Good News of a KINGDOM, and that King is proclaimed beginning at Genesis 1:1 (the first prophecy is Genesis 3).
I have much to relate but do not want to monopolize your time. I am a follower of Yeshua Ha'Maschiach and await His return - as prophesied - in which He will be ruling from Jerusalem, not D.C., The Hague, London, Paris, or other current garbage dump. Shalom.
Timothy S. Kittle
---
Mr. Kittle:
Thank you for your warm and well-thought-out letter!
I am keenly invested in combatting the anti-Zionist, anti-Semitic, and this anti-Christian lies which attack Israel and demonize Jews.
I was worried that my article this morning would not resonate with many readers, and it did not seem to get much traction or sharing on social media.
I am very grateful for your letter, and I may explore the Biblical defense for Christian Zionism in a future article.
Stay tuned!
Thank you again for writing!
Subscribe to:
Comments (Atom)