The Progressive Movement, from the early 20th
century to today, operated from a flawed premise: Man is basically good, and
the power of the state can shape him toward better tendencies, aims, and
behaviors. A record of the wars and rumors of wars, the failures of power in
the hands of any good man – made corrupt over time and influence – indicate a healthy
reserve towards power to people, or unbridled trust to his limited, yet static
nature. However, the fallen nature of man does not inspire pride in prideful
man. Thus, academics from the early 1800s to the present day have challenged
the learning and the humility of their ancestors. However, humanity’s fraught,
broken aspects cannot be ignored, despite the desperate pleadings of elites,
bureaucrats, and illiberal interest groups insistent on changing the world to
their own dictates.
These Progressives preached progress as human perfectibility
through the power of the state. The records of history, apart from sanitized,
state-sponsored propaganda, demonstrate that liberty, conservative principles
of limited government, foster true progress.
German pundits, paid by the autocratic Prussian state, then
Karl Marx and his communistic followers, pursued a better world by rigorous
planning, or brute force at the barrel of a gun. These terrifying goals seduce
those who have not lived under well-intentioned tyranny. Ironically, this Progressive
impulse for equality of results, for static outcomes for all, central planning
in the hands of well-trained elites, does not imply progress. These antiquated
views populated the minds of Ancient Greek and Roman thinkers, and the rogue
administrators who usurped power from the individuals whom they claimed to
serve, and benefited themselves.
To this day, I find it remarkable that so many tech-savvy
politicos trust our rising, complex administrative state to a few “experts”,
many of whom hold wrong views on . . .just about everything. This “benevolent”
despotism went out of favor with the “Enlightenment” philosophers seeking court
favors. The unconscious consensus of individuals, with better information about
their particular needs, informs our markets and culture more accurately than
the blind planning of the few. Can’t Progressives do better than regurgitate stale
ideas which never worked in the first place?
Their sophomoric disdains free markets and enterprise,
capitalism and private property as old-fashioned and deficient. Yet the systems
of open trade have leveled the playing field for all markets, for individuals
to become successful entrepreneurs. If someone is not successful, they cannot
blame the skewed background of government intervention and bureaucratic
micromanaging. Great civilizations, then and now, did not spring forth from
government planning, but individual invention, unfettered trade, and the growth
of mutual, voluntary trust.
American Progress (John Gast) |
About abortion, anyone who argues that terminating a life as
a matter of convenience is noble or modern, should review their history. Ancient
cultures sacrificed children to esoteric deities. Barbaric cultures dedicated
their rapacious war efforts to slaughtering not only every able-bodied male,
but ripping out the unborn children from the wombs of pregnant mothers, wives
resting safely at home. For those who advocate for abortion on demand today,
their myopic views merely mirror the backward barbarity of ages long gone.
Progressives degrade the family as an antiquated structure,
unworthy of replication or respect. However, families, through the marriage of
one man and one woman, are not as old-fashioned as one would assume. In Old
Testament biblical accounts, men took multiple wives. With those strife-ridden arrangements
emerged fights over proper rearing and the legacy of inheritance engendered
more problems than solutions. Same-sex couplings were common. Reread the
records of Sodom and Gomorrah and references to “Sons of Belial” throughout the
Israelite histories. Homosexuality was common among the ancient Greeks, Romans,
and Chinese, too. And so were its deleterious consequences. Prostitution was
not only legal, but welcomed in Mediterranean societies, along with incest and
pedophilia. These disordered behaviors resulted in the measured decline of once
great societies, no longer producing strong couples, healthy children, or thriving
societies. Today, more Americans – and promoters of Western culture – are
restoring the vision and value of marriage and family: nourished children who
become strong citizens and create better communities, better than anything
constructed by force or legislative fiat.
For generations, if not millennia, individuals were not
permitted to own firearms, to protect themselves from rogue tribes or thuggish
nobles. During the fall of the Roman Empire, townspeople seeking any safety
would seek refuge from large estate owners, many of whom would demand the
freedom and property of those individuals in return. The strength of knights
and their widespread war machines belonged to the well-connected landowners,
even up to the 18th century. Self-preservation through ownership of
firearms, the American colonists fired the “shot heard round the world” and
sparked the American Revolution, in which individual liberty, enshrined in the
English Bill of Rights, would remain enforced for generations to come. Despite
Progressive posturing for gun control, The Second Amendment remains sacrosanct,
a testimony to the eternal necessity of man to preserve himself from danger.
Conservatives must retake the debate over what constitutes “progress”.
Progress is about liberty, not tyranny; freedom, not control; opportunity, not conformity.
Conservatives, not “Progressives”, promote progress for all.
No comments:
Post a Comment