Response to Let Commie Mamdani Take New York City
Dear Mr Schaper-
Arthur Christopher Schaper
Response to Let Commie Mamdani Take New York City
Dear Mr Schaper-
Arthur Christopher Schaper
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
For too long, parents have been intimidated into being polite and politically correct. But if you want results, it's time to tell the truth!We’re teaching parents that if you want to get the attention of public officials on issues they want to ignore, you have to begin to play hardball!
It is shocking and offensive that public officials around the country have no interest in protecting children from the pornography and sexual imagery in library books brought in by radical library directors. We see it everywhere.
Instead, parents who complain are forced to fill out time-consuming “book challenge forms” (which are never approved) and go through other bureaucratic hoops. And if they keep raising a fuss, they can expect officials to find ways to intimidate and ultimately silence them.
Most parents meekly comply and even do their best to appear “moderate” and “reasonable.” But MassResistance opposes that approach. To get officials’ attention, the truth must be told boldly!
Hales Corners, Wisconsin is a small suburb of Milwaukee (technically a “village”) with a population of about 7,700. In a county that’s considered “deep blue,” Hales Corners votes relatively conservative.
For nearly two years, local parents have been trying to get the obscene books out of their local library. The Hales Corner library, run by a radical leftist library director and a leftist library board, had become a depository of horrible pornography and LGBT propaganda targeting kids.
Library books the parents are outraged about include:
[Caution: disturbing material]
Let’s Talk About It, by Erika Moen/Matthew Nolan – excerpts
This Book is Gay, by Juno Dawson – excerpts
It’s Perfectly Normal, by Robie H Harris/Michael Emberly – excerpts
Heartstopper Volume 5, by Alice Oserman – description
The parents were told to go through the process of submitting “challenge forms” for each of the books. But then, all their challenges were denied. The library officials and town officials basically ignored the parents after that.
When the parents tried to read excerpts of the books at library board meetings, the board told them that it was not allowed because it was a repetition of what they had submitted in their challenge filings. (That speech restriction is against state law, we later found out.) It was maddening – and depressing.
But the parents did not want to give up. In August they contacted MassResistance, and formed a local Wisconsin MassResistance chapter. Things were about to change drastically!
At the August 28 library board meeting, the parents made it clear that they would no longer be ignored. Several parents protested outside of the meeting – with very descriptive signs. So everyone who attended, as well as people who drove by, could see what the problem was!
Outside the August 28 library board meeting.The real action began inside, at the meeting. During public comment, two parents gave fiery testimony. Those meetings are not videoed, but one of the parents showed us what she read. She had pointed at the library director, Stephanie Lewin-Lane, and said:
You have allowed our library to become a cesspool of perversion! You are a pervert and so is every member of this board that goes along to get along! If it wasn't for the loophole in the law, you'd all be in jail. You are ALL pushing porn and sodomy on our children. Shame on you, you perverts!
And she went on from there! She ended by reading a Bible verse. (More on that later.)
The library officials had never faced that kind of wrath before. They were dumbfounded and reacted childishly. For example, on the sidewalk outside the building, one of the parents had written a chalk message: “Stephanie Lewin-Lane pushes porn on kids.” The library officials called the police and tried to file charges – attempting to use the municipal law against painting graffiti on public or private property (which technically includes using chalk)!
That law had clearly never been used against a chalk message on a sidewalk. It was bizarre. The police sheepishly just sent a letter to the parents’ leader asking the parents to please not chalk the sidewalk again.
But the parents were just getting started! They passed out flyers around town and at local events inviting people to alert people and invite them to join the fight on behalf of the village’s children. They published a letter to the editor in the local paper. They began a petition to have the library director removed.
They made it clear that they would return for the next library board meeting on September 25. They prepared more hard-hitting testimony and organized a strong presence of parents – inside and outside.
On the day of the meeting, their energetic protest outside the building, along the street, was easily seen by passing traffic. The protest included a table where people could review copies of some of the books, and sign the petition to have the library director removed. This all got a lot of attention.
Outside the September 25 library board meeting.

The officials sent police officers to patrol the parents' protest. The parents showed them the library books. The police were shocked!The protest had been going strong outside the building. But as library board meeting time got closer, the parents outside discovered that the meeting had been moved to a different location – the village town hall. They were also told that there would be no public comment allowed at that meeting. And there would be police at the meeting.
What was this all about? One mother spoke with the village president (similar to a mayor) at that meeting. She said that he accused the parents of being “against LGBTQ” (which they don’t deny!) and told her that the library board felt their lives were threatened by testimony at the previous meeting. Thus, police were now present. He also said that the law allows a public board to prohibit public comment.
What was the testimony that the library board members considered to be a death threat? The answer is more absurd than you can imagine: It was the mother’s Bible quote that she read at the previous meeting:
The Bible speaks about those who intentionally harm children. Matthew 18:6: "But whoso shall offend one of these little ones which believe in me, it were better for him that a millstone were hanged about his neck, and that he were drowned in the depth of the sea."
But our side wasn’t intimidated by any of this. Even though they weren’t allowed to testify, parents showed up at the meeting and held up their signs – just so the officials still got the message!
Inside at the meeting, the town brought in police to watch over the "dangerous" parents.
The parents weren't allowed to speak, but their message got through!The parents are continuing to move forward. They’re getting the word out and gathering more signatures on their petition. The town officials are visibly on the defensive. And although the village council (similar to a city council) can’t directly deal with library operations, they will also be getting an earful at their upcoming meetings!

We’ve observed this so many times before. Normal people would be sickened just looking at what’s in these “children’s” books. But so many of our public officials are clearly not normal people. They not only are not bothered at all that children have access to these books, and they go to great lengths to keep them available.
Most of the time they can count on the parents who oppose the books to be meek and compliant – and eventually give up. But under our watch, those days are numbered!
As we say, the first step is to understand that obscene books don’t just walk into a library by themselves. A person being paid by tax dollars purposefully selects them. And others work to keep them there. This issue must be front-and-center until it’s solved!
Our uncompromising work is made possible by people like you!
Please help us reach our $500K goal to keep it going!
Total as of 10/14/25: $224,527 / 1,388 donations
Your support will make a difference!
Room full of liberals! pic.twitter.com/PA5KvnW8aa
— Johnny Midnight ⚡️ (@its_The_Dr) October 14, 2025
|
Contact: rncpress@gop.comRNC Statement on Hostages Freed by President Trump’s Historic Peace PlanWASHINGTON, D.C. – Republican National Committee (RNC) Chairman Joe Gruters released the following statement after the release of all remaining hostages taken by Hamas during the October 7th terrorist attacks: |
https://www.google.com/search?q=humphrey%27s+executor+v+united+states&oq=humphries+exec&gs_lcrp=EgZjaHJvbWUqEggCEAAYChiDARixAxiABBiKBTIGCAAQRRg5Mg8IARAAGAoYgwEYsQMYgAQyEggCEAAYChiDARixAxiABBiKBTIPCAMQABgKGIMBGLEDGIAEMgkIBBAAGAoYgAQyCQgFEAAYChiABDIJCAYQABgKGIAEMgkIBxAAGAoYgAQyCQgIEAAYChiABDIJCAkQABgKGIAEMgkIChAAGAoYgAQyCQgLEAAYChiABDIJCAwQABgKGIAEMgkIDRAAGAoYgAQyCQgOEAAYChiABNIBCDUyODJqMGo0qAIOsAIB8QV-7ar0vSGX2g&client=ms-android-verizon-us-rvc3&sourceid=chrome-mobile&ie=UTF-8
https://www.scotusblog.com/2025/10/is-humphreys-executor-headed-for-slaughter/
https://geediting.com/s-7-books-only-the-most-well-read-boomers-insist-are-masterpieces-that-younger-generations-find-impossible-to-get-through/
Hamas is finished
— Siyad Raleme 🇱🇧 (@siyad_raleme) October 9, 2025
Hezbollah is finished
Al assad regime is finished
The Houthis are weakened and non-threatening
Iran is paralyzed, isolated, weakened, and back to its borders
The Abraham accords, peace, security and prosperity in the entire region is the only path forward 🕊️…
Response to The Pope’s Comments Regarding Abortion,
Illegal Immigration, and The Death Penalty
By Peter Michael Hall
Pope Leo XIV recently made comments regarding the pro-life movement,
abortion, and the death penalty that displayed shocking hypocrisy and ignorance.
Per a recent NPR article The Pope stated "Someone who says I'm against
abortion but is in favor of the death penalty is not really pro-life,"
Pope Leo said. "And someone who says I'm against abortion but I'm in
agreement with the inhuman treatment of immigrants in the United States, I
don't know if that's pro-life."
Giangrave, Claire, and Daniel Burke. "Pope Leo XIV Says
'Inhuman Treatment of Immigrants' in the U.S. Isn't 'Pro-Life'." NPR,
1 Oct. 2025, 5:53 p.m., www.npr.org.
This comment would be bad enough coming from anybody; but
when it comes from The Pope, The Supreme Leader of The Catholic Church; and The
Holy Emissary of God on Earth, it shows a shocking and disgusting amount of
ignorance, and even disregard for The Holy Bible which is the foundation of The
Catholic Church; and the rest of The Christian Faith.
I really don’t
want to hear morality lectures from The Pope regarding issues like illegal
immigration, the death penalty, or abortion, especially because he takes a pot
shot at the pro-life movement by tying it to issues that it has no connection
to.
If The Pope
cares so much about immigrants, refugees, etc, why doesn’t he open up the walls
of The Vatican City? Why doesn’t The Catholic Church use it’s vast amount of
wealth, and political influence to help displaced people find new safe and
hospitable homes? Instead all they’re doing is sermonizing, and criticizing
countries like The United States of America when they’re trying to resolve a
serious problem that’s happening within their sovereign borders; and negatively
impacting the lives of their tax paying, law abiding citizens.
As I mentioned
earlier The Pope’s comments displayed a gross amount of ignorance and disregard
of The Holy Bible; Jesus himself said only thieves and robbers break in by
force, or sneak in instead of coming through the front door. (John 10:1.)
Granted his statement was concerning himself and his flock of sheep, and those
who would try to mislead them; but the principle behind his words can be
applied to people illegally entering a sovereign country’s borders; breaking
and entering into a house, etc.
Jesus also
declared that he is the way to his Father, and that nobody may get to The
Father but through him. (John 14:6.) Again his statement was about himself
being the only way to get to God The Father; but the principle behind his words
can be applied to topics like immigration. There’s a right way and a wrong way
to enter a sovereign country; and those who enter it the wrong way should be
dispelled; and sovereign countries get to decide who can come in, who can’t,
who can stay, anf who has to go.
Also while The
Bible commands us to be kind and hospitable to foreigners, it does so on the
condition that said foreigners follow
the law, and assimilate as much as possible
Exodus 12:48-49
NIV [48] “A foreigner residing among you who wants to celebrate the Lord’s
Passover must have all the males in his household circumcised; then he may take
part like one born in the land. No uncircumcised male may eat it. [49] The same
law applies both to the native-born and to the foreigner residing among you.”
Leviticus
24:20-22 NIV [20] “fracture for fracture, eye for eye, tooth for tooth. The one
who has inflicted the injury must suffer the same injury. [21] Whoever kills an
animal must make restitution, but whoever kills a human being Is to be put to
death. [22] You are to have the same law for the foreigner and the native-born.
I am the Lord your God.”
The Pope’s
comparison of abortion and the death penalty was the most disgustingly ignorant
thing he said. “And someone who says I’m
against abortion but I’m in agreement with the inhuman treatment of immigrants
in the United States, I don’t know if that’s pro-life.”
How The Pope
doesn’t know or conveniently forgets that God established The Death Penalty is
completely beyond me. Also abortion and The Death Penalty cannot in good
conscience and logical reasoning be compared; one is the murder of unborn
children, the other is the lawful execution of legally convicted criminals.
Their executions are only wrong if they are actually innocent of the crimes
they were accused and convicted of.
The Pope needs
to do some serious restudying of The Holy Scriptures and seriously reevaluate
his thoughts before he publicly criticizes sovereign leaders who are lawfully
executing and upholding established laws for the good of their nations and
people
How much will "Orange Man Bad" push voters in New Jersey, New York, and Virginia to vote against their best interests and vote for Democrats?
With the November 2025 elections just weeks away, Democrats are putting radical leftists on the ballot in Virginia, New Jersey, and New York, and voters now have the chance to reject their far-left agenda.
Meet the Democrat nominees.
New Jersey gubernatorial candidate, Mikie Sherrill, a corrupt career politician pushing sanctuary cities, higher taxes, and attacks on parental rights:
Virginia gubernatorial candidate Abigail Spanberger, a radical liberal backing open borders, men in girls' sports and locker rooms, and socialized healthcare:
New York City Mayoral candidate, self-described Communist Zohran Mamdani, who is campaigning to defund the police, abolish prisons , give taxpayer-funded benefits to illegal aliens, and impose socialist policies like government-run grocery stories and converting private properties into communes:
The stakes couldn’t be higher.
If voters don’t stop the radical Democrats this November, they will take Virginia, New Jersey, and New York and turn them into sanctuaries for illegal aliens and far-left extremism.
Kiersten Pels
RNC National Press Secretary
kpels@gop.com | @kierstenpels